@@SpinyAnt They would call our secret aircraft magic. 10 years behind. Maybe 100 years behind. China would think they are 100 years behind. It's probably closer to 100 years behind the US
New thinking is required. Drones rule the battlefield. Much cheaper battle vehicles based on American pickup trucks that are fully autonomous might be something to consider.
The M1E3 Abrams represents a bold step into the future of armored warfare. From hybrid engines to advanced APS, could this be the tank to redefine the battlefield? Share your thoughts below!
Make it a bigger caliber weapon and have a laser on it and have a phalanx on it the kind that is heat will stop heat signatures AKA people Pandora please missiles everything United States needs to make more weapons immediately
,some have laser cannons its old school.just not common knowldge I worked on the air force laser development range people you don't have a clue what we are capable of just be glad we rule theres no other like the USA
Yup, if it doesn’t block drones it doesn’t block anything 30 MM could work for that though, but army doesn’t take orders off of Twitter so probably nothing will happen which we can’t afford
I also think American tank designers quit fooling around and put the engine in the front where the heaviest armour is located adding to its survivability!!!!!
Why trains run on electric motors the deasil is to run generators charging the motors thy have been that way for a long time and they work just fine electric motors don't have the heat signature of fuel engines and are harder to find use a little sense insted of thinking your so smart your not even close
OKAY THE APS IS THE SAME THING AS I THOUGHT OF 35 YEARS AGO!!!!CLAYMORES ON THE SIDE AND TOP OF TANKS WITH MOTION DETECTOR TO STOP RPG AND KEEP INFANTRY FROM GETTING CLOSE!!!!THE RANGE AND PATTERN OF A CLAYMORE WOULD STOP DRONES FROM ATTACKING TROOPS!!!!BY SETTING UP AROUND THEN AND SETTING BY TROOPS OR MOTION DETECTOR!!!!!NO RADAR NEEDED!!!!!
I don’t understand why tanks feel a need to be able to release drones out of a side hatch. I understand the purpose of the drones, but in most situations, wouldn’t the tank be fighting alongside an infantry unit, which would be perfectly capable of releasing a drone on their own time, when the need arises? Why dedicate a section of the tank to this specific task? Perhaps the drone can be easily controlled from the inside of the tank - but, if the drone is then set on some kind of auto-mode, which I would highly suspect, why would it need to come form the tank? I understand that the drone would send back information to the tank through built-in, linked systems, but couldn’t many purpose-built drones fulfill this task? Is the whole feature just a gimmick? I would rather use that dedicated section of the tank for more firepower, or, if possible, more Trophy system capability
How does the m1e3 hold up against drones or the missile launchers were sending to Ukraine?.. that's what it needs to fight w as well as artillery and air Craft/ attack helicopters
Drones work but no country has the laser tech of the united states satellites are no match for our laser wepons nothing is we can burn them from space dont doubt it
bring some of those Ukrainian engineers that know exactly what work and what doesn't, Mako hypersonic micro missiles 200 miles plus range, , directed energy weapon, trophy anti missile system, Tesla force field around the entire tank., drone and anti drone munitions, well, the technology is matured enough to be included in the tank, ai enhanced battlefield helper, hybrid engine period
Where do you think they learned from ? drones are old tech they won't survive an attack from lasers and the US has them they can be destroyed from miles away missiles are no match, buildings planes satalites tanks ships all can and have been destroyed by them
Idk 🤷 what we are doing!? We the USA are helping Ukraine!? Right? So just ask Ukraine to send us a few of their war drones and see if the tank survives!? It ain’t rocket science!!!!
Lol the AI systems that humans use now and for the foreseeable future aren't even kinda close to the scary Sci-fi AI that might rebel against humanity. Those AI wouldn't be used in a pitiful little tank. It would be running our entire satellite and intelligence systems. It might use a little toes worth of its capabilites to run our armored warfare. The computers themselves would probably fill a warehouse or two and would absolutely not fit in a tank. The AI's that our tanks would use wouldn't be much different than the AI's we already use all over the place.
Another channel using “clickbait” thumbnails and/or titles that have absolutely nothing to do with the actual content, why????, it is either because the content is dry, boring, inaccurate or outdated, or, and this is the most likely reason, is that the uploader thinks that clickbait is going to increase viewers, likes and comments that will enhance the monetisation of the channel, but it is more likely to put viewers off because it makes people, like me, think that the content is probably inaccurate because the thumbnail/title is the only way to get viewers etc, let your content speak for itself, if you are not confident in your own work then why would viewers be confident in it. No thanks, not going to waste time on something that is not interesting or accurate. 👎 Just before I go I want to say that, just recently, a video about the new future 6th gen fighter being developed by a British, Japanese and Italian consortium was released and because the project has only got to the mockup stage many American viewers were all to happy to criticise the project for only being a mockup and therefore couldn’t possibly be any good or looked like the F-22 (which it doesn’t), and they were quite aggressive and demeaning about it, I just have to wonder how many of those people would say anything similar about this project only having a demonstrator that looks nothing like the final version, I doubt it because this is an American project and therefore, in their tiny minds, it must be good and will be the best tank ever made, the best in combat and technological advancement since the invention of the tank, total hypocrisy and bragging without any idea if or when it might be in service, and unfortunately it is always the same, patriotism is one thing being big headed is another, it must be drummed into the American 🇺🇸 people that there is no one outside the USA that can do better than them, and, sorry to say, they need to wake up and smell the coffee because they are WRONG.
Aint no charging stations for trains eather and they all run off of electricty there all powerd by electric motors desial is to charge the motor not drive the train try using a little sense it will help.
Dont doubt the US military we are the best was a airforce cop and army ranger you dont have a clue what a platoon of rangers is capable of ,RANGERS WE LEAD THE WAY is not just talk we can and do like no others
The defense contractor providing the software had made his development proprietary ....... So this fact being said, it requires a technician from the defense contractor because they will not release the passcodes for our own technician to access it. So everything cost twice as much 🫣 how we would let a defense contractor hold our development in our DOD hostage? I believe the competition needs to be shared. I believe the software needs to be shared. It's spot and developed and paid for by the DOD. I don't know how that loophole was left wide open. So big 100 car rock train could drive through it. The yf-23 easily exceeded so many of the parameters that were set and exceeded the raptor by so many. Nobody asked for a dog fighter but the simple solution to that was they were going to add canards to the end of the wings that were trapezoid. This would keep the stealth configuration. Bfx keeps putting canards on the front of the fuselage like a Euro fighter, which is absolutely nothing to do with the yf23 and the statements made. They were not looking for a dog fighter. They were looking for a bfr platform. First look first shot !!! I can't believe the dod put themselves in that position and wonder why everything's costing twice as much for a simple software upgrade. My Lord my God 🕊️🕊️🕊️
*US Tests The NEW Deadliest Tank In History!*
holy shit bra.
Thanks admin
The Abram's 3 will take a lot of beating.
Right now, the Abram's 3 is by far, the leader of the pack !!!
I've heard it said that China is at least ten years behind America, I wouldn't be surprised that it is more than that !!!
@@SpinyAnt They would call our secret aircraft magic. 10 years behind. Maybe 100 years behind. China would think they are 100 years behind. It's probably closer to 100 years behind the US
good video. i love tanks 😍😍😍
Us too!
Need more protections against drones, my man … 😅
Yeah! Thanks so much!
I saw a few Weapon systems that protect against drones and incoming missiles like laser cannons
America baby we are no.1 no one is better than us. God bless America. Less is more.
Me too!
😅😂@@navypowertv
We don't quit till we win.
adaptive intelligent metamateria , the technology is here already
The adoption of a hybrid engine in tanks marks a new chapter in the evolution of combat vehicles!
New thinking is required. Drones rule the battlefield. Much cheaper battle vehicles based on American pickup trucks that are fully autonomous might be something to consider.
Drones have definitely become a battlefield force multiplier.
But having armor like that on the field is still extremely useful
US SO POWER! KEEP FIGHT!
GO GO
What do I think I think you showed a picture of a tank with Lazers and then showed us the same old shit
Where do you recharge the tank on the battlefield ?
Do know what hybrid means?
The M1E3 Abrams represents a bold step into the future of armored warfare. From hybrid engines to advanced APS, could this be the tank to redefine the battlefield? Share your thoughts below!
Amazing! US NAVY is power
Tanks feel so primitive in terms of modern warfare. -- Still, the tech is somewhat impressive.
US SHOULD JUST TEST JAS39E DUAL
COMMAND!
Not designed for modern combat. All the shortfalls that have shown up in Ukraine have not been fixed. Drone food.
My wife and just ordered three of these for home protection.
- Excellent ABRAMS M1E3,dissuasion en temps pré- guerre !
- Efficace,dans la guerre !
Um lasers as well as at least 65mm guns..anti drone tech like directed emps
US IS SECOND TO NONE!
NULLI SECUNDUS!
Amen we ARE THE BEST NO OTHER COMES CLOSE
How do you know ? we've never fought a peer Army before
Looks like we're in trouble there's nothing really new here just a couple of improvements
Worthwhile improvement!
@navypowertv we can do much better basically we've got the same thing but just a couple of little tweaks not worth my tax money
The design of the M1E3 Abrams not only optimizes performance but also aligns with future combat requirements
Ya, but can it survive a $1k drone w/warhead to the turret gap? Probably not 💥💢🔥❗️
I believe it will 👹👹❤️🔥❤️🔥
Yeah!
Why don’t tanks have protective metal skirts protecting the tread systems?
I Think Worthwhile improvement!
Oh my goodness.
Thank so so much! Please allway support my channel! ❤️❤️❤️
Volunteer's needed.
The Raptor vs. the J20 comes down to the Raptors missile capacity. It can only kill as many J20's as missiles it can carry.
Lasers?
Looks Impressive....
hmmmm.... swarm of drones... hmmmmmm
Make it a bigger caliber weapon and have a laser on it and have a phalanx on it the kind that is heat will stop heat signatures AKA people Pandora please missiles everything United States needs to make more weapons immediately
,some have laser cannons its old school.just not common knowldge I worked on the air force laser development range people you don't have a clue what we are capable of just be glad we rule theres no other like the USA
Waste of money on a form of weaponry that is fast being superseded. Spend your money on the latest missiles and drones..
There should be no electric powered vehicles in our army. There are no charging stations on the battlefield.
M1E3 Abrams: A revolutionary combat platform or just another ambitious project!
US NAVY is best
Don't leave them in the rain
The US of course
Yup, if it doesn’t block drones it doesn’t block anything 30 MM could work for that though, but army doesn’t take orders off of Twitter so probably nothing will happen which we can’t afford
One below🫵🤪
And have armed drones attached to the tank so they can see what's coming miles away
Too little too late
I also think American tank designers quit fooling around and put the engine in the front where the heaviest armour is located adding to its survivability!!!!!
And will the "deadliest tank" get it's cannon from Rheinmetall, again?
Know they can't...
How about adding Lazers ???
Making videos is like making Hollywood blockbusters!
So when we make thumbnails we try to make them as beautiful as a poster!
@@navypowertvUsing clickbait can quickly erode the trust of your audience.
Electrification is a big mistake
Why trains run on electric motors the deasil is to run generators charging the motors thy have been that way for a long time and they work just fine electric motors don't have the heat signature of fuel engines and are harder to find use a little sense insted of thinking your so smart your not even close
Do they burn though ?
Yes! Thanks
No, a lighter tank would be more vulnerable to being overcome !!!
OKAY THE APS IS THE SAME THING AS I THOUGHT OF 35 YEARS AGO!!!!CLAYMORES ON THE SIDE AND TOP OF TANKS WITH MOTION DETECTOR TO STOP RPG AND KEEP INFANTRY FROM GETTING CLOSE!!!!THE RANGE AND PATTERN OF A CLAYMORE WOULD STOP DRONES FROM ATTACKING TROOPS!!!!BY SETTING UP AROUND THEN AND SETTING BY TROOPS OR MOTION DETECTOR!!!!!NO RADAR NEEDED!!!!!
We did that to apcs in nam worked just fine and that was 50 years ago
I don’t understand why tanks feel a need to be able to release drones out of a side hatch. I understand the purpose of the drones, but in most situations, wouldn’t the tank be fighting alongside an infantry unit, which would be perfectly capable of releasing a drone on their own time, when the need arises? Why dedicate a section of the tank to this specific task? Perhaps the drone can be easily controlled from the inside of the tank - but, if the drone is then set on some kind of auto-mode, which I would highly suspect, why would it need to come form the tank? I understand that the drone would send back information to the tank through built-in, linked systems, but couldn’t many purpose-built drones fulfill this task? Is the whole feature just a gimmick?
I would rather use that dedicated section of the tank for more firepower, or, if possible, more Trophy system capability
Yep! Thanks for Infomation!
You don't know because you aren't ment to know what we are capable of
Using AI how would u keep from getting infatuated
No! My Team is 100% HUMAN!
How does the m1e3 hold up against drones or the missile launchers were sending to Ukraine?.. that's what it needs to fight w as well as artillery and air Craft/ attack helicopters
Drones work but no country has the laser tech of the united states satellites are no match for our laser wepons nothing is we can burn them from space dont doubt it
bring some of those Ukrainian engineers that know exactly what work and what doesn't, Mako hypersonic micro missiles 200 miles plus range, , directed energy weapon, trophy anti missile system, Tesla force field around the entire tank., drone and anti drone munitions, well, the technology is matured enough to be included in the tank, ai enhanced battlefield helper, hybrid engine period
Where do you think they learned from ? drones are old tech they won't survive an attack from lasers and the US has them they can be destroyed from miles away missiles are no match, buildings planes satalites tanks ships all can and have been destroyed by them
Making such a advancement is very good. Therefore you guys should never allow putin to capture Ukraine. Make jutise reign.
A couple of drones could wipe that thing out. Another overpriced piece of junk that's way behind the times in technology in Modern Warfare
Is it true that there's an AI General that is cutting orders in the Ukraine apparently a lot of people do not know it is AI and not a human
💖💓💞❤️🔥💕💘💝
Israel AI tank is the best in the world, supreme power defensive tank. TANK ANALYLIST.
Idk 🤷 what we are doing!? We the USA are helping Ukraine!? Right? So just ask Ukraine to send us a few of their war drones and see if the tank survives!? It ain’t rocket science!!!!
Lol the AI systems that humans use now and for the foreseeable future aren't even kinda close to the scary Sci-fi AI that might rebel against humanity. Those AI wouldn't be used in a pitiful little tank. It would be running our entire satellite and intelligence systems. It might use a little toes worth of its capabilites to run our armored warfare. The computers themselves would probably fill a warehouse or two and would absolutely not fit in a tank.
The AI's that our tanks would use wouldn't be much different than the AI's we already use all over the place.
Thanks Infomation so much!
Your a sad sad creature so ignorant
No they lost cause emp stop a that
Thumbnail is hyper 🌈 vibes.
Thanks! It's same same Poster Movie Hollydood! :D
Another channel using “clickbait” thumbnails and/or titles that have absolutely nothing to do with the actual content, why????, it is either because the content is dry, boring, inaccurate or outdated, or, and this is the most likely reason, is that the uploader thinks that clickbait is going to increase viewers, likes and comments that will enhance the monetisation of the channel, but it is more likely to put viewers off because it makes people, like me, think that the content is probably inaccurate because the thumbnail/title is the only way to get viewers etc, let your content speak for itself, if you are not confident in your own work then why would viewers be confident in it. No thanks, not going to waste time on something that is not interesting or accurate. 👎
Just before I go I want to say that, just recently, a video about the new future 6th gen fighter being developed by a British, Japanese and Italian consortium was released and because the project has only got to the mockup stage many American viewers were all to happy to criticise the project for only being a mockup and therefore couldn’t possibly be any good or looked like the F-22 (which it doesn’t), and they were quite aggressive and demeaning about it, I just have to wonder how many of those people would say anything similar about this project only having a demonstrator that looks nothing like the final version, I doubt it because this is an American project and therefore, in their tiny minds, it must be good and will be the best tank ever made, the best in combat and technological advancement since the invention of the tank, total hypocrisy and bragging without any idea if or when it might be in service, and unfortunately it is always the same, patriotism is one thing being big headed is another, it must be drummed into the American 🇺🇸 people that there is no one outside the USA that can do better than them, and, sorry to say, they need to wake up and smell the coffee because they are WRONG.
I call bullshit 🤣🤣🤣
Aint no charging stations for trains eather and they all run off of electricty there all powerd by electric motors desial is to charge the motor not drive the train try using a little sense it will help.
Dont doubt the US military we are the best was a airforce cop and army ranger you dont have a clue what a platoon of rangers is capable of ,RANGERS WE LEAD THE WAY is not just talk we can and do like no others
The defense contractor providing the software had made his development proprietary ....... So this fact being said, it requires a technician from the defense contractor because they will not release the passcodes for our own technician to access it. So everything cost twice as much 🫣 how we would let a defense contractor hold our development in our DOD hostage? I believe the competition needs to be shared. I believe the software needs to be shared. It's spot and developed and paid for by the DOD. I don't know how that loophole was left wide open. So big 100 car rock train could drive through it. The yf-23 easily exceeded so many of the parameters that were set and exceeded the raptor by so many. Nobody asked for a dog fighter but the simple solution to that was they were going to add canards to the end of the wings that were trapezoid. This would keep the stealth configuration. Bfx keeps putting canards on the front of the fuselage like a Euro fighter, which is absolutely nothing to do with the yf23 and the statements made. They were not looking for a dog fighter. They were looking for a bfr platform. First look first shot !!!
I can't believe the dod put themselves in that position and wonder why everything's costing twice as much for a simple software upgrade. My Lord my God 🕊️🕊️🕊️
wow, so thanks for Infomation!
@@navypowertv That is a god-given fact. Unfortunately
Another that don't know shit that's you don't think you have top secret clearance so like usual you run you mouth and think cause you said it its true
Kapow, batman got nothing on this beautiful behemoth. Move over Marvel Universe.😂🤨🤌👌👌👌🥰🥰👿 hooray.