@@5unny5ide It's more of them not having critical thinking skills to understand confounding variables in a situation, but it's also them not wanting to be responsible for their own safety, so by their logic everyone else should not be allowed to own guns in order for them to feel safe.
so criminals can have detachable magezines but law abiding citizens gotta go back to lever action geting more law abiding citizens killed. Who does this help and why was this proposed? it helps authoritarians of course.
@@KittenTheB What are you talking about Colorado's been run by Democrats for over 20 years Denver's been run by Democrats since the '60s and Boulder the late '80s so yes it is a level progressive disease that's killing the state
@@FuegoSavvy Infringement has already happened with age limits. So....... Unless we think it's ok to give toddlers loaded pew pews, this argument is irrelevant. The Supreme Court has already ruled that infringement is fine for the purpose of public safety.
USA supports genocide but cries when its done to them by the same people? Who do you think is after your guns? Wake up. May take 20 years but it will happen.
I agree just because something bad happens to does not give you the right to strip other people's rights away maybe who wasn't for a gun-free zone maybe his son would be alive I hate to say that but it's politicians laws that cause the problem and use this man for political gane
@@jacobew2000 Yup if they grant cert on Snope V Brown and Ocean State Tactical v Rhode Island they will almost certainly strike this down. Crossing my fingers they grant cert tomorrow and we find out Monday.
Seems like all the "pro ban" folks never stop to think about the enormous amount of already existing guns and magazines in the state. We probably shouldn't tell them.
'All current magazines and weapons will be grandfathered in' that's probably in the 1000s for the weapons and tens of 1000s for magazines. Both can be brought into the state quite easily by car. This bill will do nothing to make anyone safer..
This clause also seems to be again the constitutional principle that all people must be treated equally. "Current owners" should not have any additional rights.
@@BillTrowbridge they grandfathered them because they knew that banning the ownership of these guns would be unenforceable just like the proposed law. Its all for show.
Or Oklahoma, or Nebraska, or Utah, or New Mexico. Literally every state surrounding Colorado has lax gun laws. This state senator can’t see past his own nose. Denver is going to be Chicago 2.0 soon
@@jacka55six60 They do not check IDs for "high capacity magazines". And you can still buy a rifle in Wyoming under federal law, even with a California or Colorado License.
So anything over 15 rounds and detachable, so they are going to ban handguns that come stock with a 17 round mag? Their ideology of high capacity is just wrong if they say anything over 15 rounds is "high capacity." If these magazine are all ready illegal and people are still getting them illegally then the bill does nothing but hurt law abiding citizens. Criminals don't care what laws you put into place because they don't follow the law. Majority of handguns are semi-auto and some have over 15 round capacity, all except revolvers have a detachable magazine.
@@apexwild9700 They'll try to say they're being reasonable when they offer a 10 rd mag cap. NYC tried to push for a 7 rd cap but gun owners and the industry refused and NYC backed down.
@jacka55six60 so then it bands handguns. It doesn't matter if it has a 10 round mag capacity if its semi automatic and detachable magazine it's getting banned
@@apexwild9700 It’s not about round count anymore. The bill bans all semiautomatic long guns with detachable magazines and AR/AK pistols. The current wording makes it unclear if it includes all semiautomatic pistols.
Waves of Left Coast libtards flooded in after their states became overpriced drug/crime addled w/ roving homeless camps. Now we are rapidly catching up in Denver, just a total coincidence.
"They made it clear that the loss of life isn't anything that they cherish, like the rest of us do." You are exactly right! We gun owners DO NOT CHERISH THE LOSS OF LIFE!
@@stevenjackson7830 You do not have a right to disarm another citizen, in the argument that it will somehow stop crime. "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
As a Democrat I can honestly say, this is the most ridiculous bill. Virtually every police issued handgun has a detachable magazine. There's probably 50 to 100 semi-auto pistols sold to every one revolver. Face Palm.
During the time it takes this bill to work thru the legislation ,, won't that have generated a serious sales up-tic in sales of those products?? And has that up-tic already started??
That shooter in in the movie theater had mental issues and told his mental health doctor his plan to kill everyone in that theater and she did not flag him as a risk. If she did, he would’ve been able to buy the gun. When she was asked after she said I thought the drugs would help. Yea if he took them. She should have been held responsible for those deaths! She should have red flagged him and should have let law enforcement know about him and his plan.
If you think for a second, banning detachable magazines won't stop the ability for people to speed reload their guns. Have you seen MA loaders? You can reload a fixed magazine wepon in less than a second. Stop going after our freedom to have fun, and put more effort into stopping shootings before they happen with proper Healthcare and security.
This is the vast majority of guns in common use so it will not survive a legal challenge and enforcement will likely be enjoined by a fed. Court before final ruling. The actual result of this bill will be to stuff the pockets of attorneys with state tax money. Along with the state attorneys, the firms that will bring action to challenge this law will be asking for attorney's fees when they prevail.
My mom is Jewish, who is 97and was a little girl living in the Borders of Germany, still talks about what they did to the Jewish people, being disarmed. Heartbreaking.... 🔯.
When a Blue City/ Blue State manages to succeed to pass this kind of anti-gun bill it will be mirrored to other Blue States/Cities... Colorado had lead some crazy draconian laws whereas to push state laws to add without changing its state constitution as a free for all and without the people's vote and pass them in legislature of bills created by lawmakers to their heart's desire and is signed off by the Governor or Mayor or laws passed by executive order... Colorado's "Home Rule" Preemption Law and was the first and is commonly shared to be mirrored by other Blue States but there is a setback when Governor Polis had pleaded to other cities to copy a gun policy of his own gun laws to ban open carry, and magazine ban from 15 rounds to 10 rounds for semi-automatic firearms, limiting or making conceal carry more difficult to obtain, increase gun-free zones beyond what is federal/state law are... Polis was disappointed when city/township mayors didn't follow through even as sheriffs around the state counties outside of Denver said they will not comply to any anti-gun laws that takes away law abiding citizens' rights to own and bear arms. I haven't heard from a Denver sheriff whether he or she will enforce and comply... Democrats must be wanting to start chaos in Colorado and across the nation to circumvent people's rights under the US Constitution and welcomes the high chance of resistance of protests and riots to armed resistance to a potential civil war conditions?!
I wonder what all the people who fought and died to give us these rights would think about this. Using personal tragedy to strip people's rights away from the other people who died to give us those rights is messed up criminals don't follow your laws learn that
so he became a senator after his son lost his life, which im sorry for, but how does that not make this man biased? I mean it seems like a personal agenda, not an agenda for the voters of colorado...
I think he feels guilty for not raising his son to be a protector and teaching him the skills to defend himself and others as a father should. Now instead of taking responsibility for his failures as a father he's shifting the blame to the reason his son and others in the movie theatre died that day is because of an inanimate object.
OK, so where’s the line you banned everything the second amendment doesn’t matter does it and then when someone uses a knife or a car to hurt people are you going to ban those to there is no legislating evil out of existence.
They can ban whatever they want it will not stop the black market sales. Putting the law abiding citizens who respect the 2a at an extreme disadvantage when protecting themselves or their homes.
Wait till they realize deranged shooters approaching a crowded area don’t care about magazine capacity laws. Especially when 3D printed mags just work as good as a normal one.
.22lr rifles, shotguns, lever actions that each have a tube magazine, and revolvers. This bill is blatantly unconstitutional, and it makes one wonder at what point does a politician trying to push blatantly illegal bills will get hit with the federal felony of deprivation of rights under color of law.
Why don’t they ban wildfires, this will save lives.
Or pickup trucks and jihadism
they should just ban murder.. oh wait...
Not pick up trucks, a lot of us actually use them i here in Colorado but yes 100% to the other one
@@SingleCabCrew techincals? maybe
@@SingleCabCrew How about stop banning stuff and just let people protect themselves?
This is why we kept saying "don't let the Cali's move here"... They're trying to ruin Colorado like they did California, they never learn.
Too late, it's been messed up since the early 2000s
They already did
Already a lost cause
Has this passed? I'm moving from Texas. I'm confused on this
@@the48thhawk74 Texas is rapidly changing too, same libs filling it up its cities maybe another 5 yrs left before it's cooked like this.
Colorado used to be such a cool state. Now I feel like i'm in some west coast nightmare.
The Blue creep is relentless, based ppl move to red area for more freedom only to have it compromised the same way in another decade.
Hey COLORADO you also HAVE TO FOLLOW Our Constitution, The RIGHT of The PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED...
Colorado is full of communist liberals Democrats
They’ve already infringed on our 2nd amendment.. trump is the only person who can fix this now
I never heard them talk about mental illness?
Liberalism is a mental illness and evil, all democrats are affected!
That's because liberals are the ones who are suffering from it
Becuase they don't actually care. They just don't want you to have the rights your parent and their parents handed down to you.
@@5unny5ide It's more of them not having critical thinking skills to understand confounding variables in a situation, but it's also them not wanting to be responsible for their own safety, so by their logic everyone else should not be allowed to own guns in order for them to feel safe.
Or the lack of real punishment FOR committing these crimes
so criminals can have detachable magezines but law abiding citizens gotta go back to lever action geting more law abiding citizens killed. Who does this help and why was this proposed? it helps authoritarians of course.
Unfortunately liberal Democrats minds are low IQ and they don't understand that
I think that Tube fed Semiautos and Australia-style Pump action AR-15s will still be legal
We need to make colorado republican again
To late.
Republican, democrat , doesn't matter. You are cucked by Israel any how
I’d be for that if republicans wanted better quality of life for all people and not just white people
Parties don't matter, freedom does.
I don't trust the men and women in suits whatever politics they are.
Colorado appears to disregard the people’s rights.
We even had to sue to get Trump on the ballot. And they now want us to treat them with respect and regard? Ha!
No. Jared Pole-smoker is the problem. Not Colorado.
@@KittenTheB
What are you talking about Colorado's been run by Democrats for over 20 years Denver's been run by Democrats since the '60s and Boulder the late '80s so yes it is a level progressive disease that's killing the state
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!! this is a violation of constitutional rights
@@FuegoSavvy
Infringement has already happened with age limits.
So.......
Unless we think it's ok to give toddlers loaded pew pews, this argument is irrelevant.
The Supreme Court has already ruled that infringement is fine for the purpose of public safety.
@@DumplingsToGodisingenuous argument, get bent
USA supports genocide but cries when its done to them by the same people? Who do you think is after your guns? Wake up. May take 20 years but it will happen.
@@DumplingsToGo once again proving liberals have brain rot
@DumplingsToGo there is no age restriction idiot and the constitution is above the court
And more and more, we fall into depravity. Without regard to reality, we create our own hell.
tom sullivan needs to go! 2a shall not be infringed
The Colo. has entered the "Twilight Zone".🤫 Tommy Boy is in the Twilight Zone!
Gun rights are human rights.
Two men are in a boat that has sprung a leak. One man says "Let's fix the leak." The other says "Lets ban leaks!" Who would you agree with?
I'm fixing the leak.
We are sorry for your loss; that being said you cannot punish the good people for the acts of those who break the law🤬
I agree just because something bad happens to does not give you the right to strip other people's rights away maybe who wasn't for a gun-free zone maybe his son would be alive I hate to say that but it's politicians laws that cause the problem and use this man for political gane
And Tom Sullivan is like "Hold my beer".
Supreme court is gonna announce this unconstitutional
Yeah, 10 years later
Hopefully by summer 2025 with the Maryland case.
@@jacobew2000 Yup if they grant cert on Snope V Brown and Ocean State Tactical v Rhode Island they will almost certainly strike this down. Crossing my fingers they grant cert tomorrow and we find out Monday.
Colorado has been California since the 99's ...was a great free place to live
Soon they will have to wear the 🔯
Seems like all the "pro ban" folks never stop to think about the enormous amount of already existing guns and magazines in the state. We probably shouldn't tell them.
Cherish the loss of life 😂 you idiots allowed an invasion of our homeland the loss of life is going to be unimaginable.
The constitution and federal judge already said no when boulder tried this.
Colorado would be great if it were not for the people of Colorado.
Oh, the people are awesome. The Socialists/Commies and the Progs are what make it suck.
I thought this bill was proposed by the lawmakers?
@ who votes for the lawmakers?
@Slap0ho Whomever Dominion (Domestic HQ in Denver) is paid to say we do.
Denver is the problem
Straight Up Infringement 🤬
Youll shut up and take it like a good little puppy I bet
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Sickening and saddening. Support the 2A!
'All current magazines and weapons will be grandfathered in' that's probably in the 1000s for the weapons and tens of 1000s for magazines. Both can be brought into the state quite easily by car. This bill will do nothing to make anyone safer..
This clause also seems to be again the constitutional principle that all people must be treated equally. "Current owners" should not have any additional rights.
@@BillTrowbridge they grandfathered them because they knew that banning the ownership of these guns would be unenforceable just like the proposed law. Its all for show.
Hundreds of thousands of weapons and millions of mags. The average gun-owning home had seven arms, most of which are semi-auto with detachable mags.
It's only a bill now so stock up.
@@RealMTBAddictImma buy them in Texas before I move and then head over there.
Unconstitional!
Funny how the communist news channel goes along with this
So let the state be invaded. Take citizens protections away. Dumb
I could also go to Kansas or Wyoming to buy a gun or a “high capacity magazine”…
Or Oklahoma, or Nebraska, or Utah, or New Mexico. Literally every state surrounding Colorado has lax gun laws. This state senator can’t see past his own nose. Denver is going to be Chicago 2.0 soon
Also the DW
Good luck with that if you have a Colorado ID.
@@jacka55six60 They do not check IDs for "high capacity magazines". And you can still buy a rifle in Wyoming under federal law, even with a California or Colorado License.
I live in Colorado and I always vote. This is an automatic vote _against_ any politician who supports this.
Voting doesn't work you need to rebel instead.
At least doing some civil disobedience like getting the magazines anyway could be a start.
What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" do they not understand?
Their communists they don't understand that. They only understand power over people
So anything over 15 rounds and detachable, so they are going to ban handguns that come stock with a 17 round mag? Their ideology of high capacity is just wrong if they say anything over 15 rounds is "high capacity." If these magazine are all ready illegal and people are still getting them illegally then the bill does nothing but hurt law abiding citizens. Criminals don't care what laws you put into place because they don't follow the law. Majority of handguns are semi-auto and some have over 15 round capacity, all except revolvers have a detachable magazine.
@@apexwild9700 They'll try to say they're being reasonable when they offer a 10 rd mag cap. NYC tried to push for a 7 rd cap but gun owners and the industry refused and NYC backed down.
NO. This bill bans ANY semi-auto that uses a detachable mag.
The 15 round ban has already been in effect for a decade.
@jacka55six60 so then it bands handguns. It doesn't matter if it has a 10 round mag capacity if its semi automatic and detachable magazine it's getting banned
@@jacka55six60 what are you saying no to
@@apexwild9700 It’s not about round count anymore. The bill bans all semiautomatic long guns with detachable magazines and AR/AK pistols. The current wording makes it unclear if it includes all semiautomatic pistols.
Applies to law enforcement as well?
Civilians first but "trust us"😂
it should...
The criminals won’t obey
Democrats are banking on that so they can make more gun laws
I’m so glad I moved out of that godforsaken state two years ago. Best decision of my life now I can legally protect my family.
Pass all the bills you want, no one is going to comply with your stupid bullshit laws.
Every Colorado FFL will have to comply. This will destroy 90% of gun stores in the state.
Utterly, unambiguously, undeniably *UNCONSTITUTIONAL*
Take this as a sign to buy more guns.
BS since it will cost lives if you can't defend against multiple criminals.
They think criminals don't exist
So 90% of hand and rifles guns?
100 percent of guns!
Revolver
"Nothing gives evil more pause than the presence of a firearm."
~~ Gen. Washington.
Why does Colorado have to suck now??? It used to be an awesome state.
Waves of Left Coast libtards flooded in after their states became overpriced drug/crime addled w/ roving homeless camps. Now we are rapidly catching up in Denver, just a total coincidence.
democrats
high capacity magazines arent illegal yall just wanna be petty af & not let anyone be able to defend them selves
"They made it clear that the loss of life isn't anything that they cherish, like the rest of us do." You are exactly right! We gun owners DO NOT CHERISH THE LOSS OF LIFE!
That statement completely disregards and misrepresents the truth and rights of others.
@@stevenjackson7830 You do not have a right to disarm another citizen, in the argument that it will somehow stop crime.
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
Sullivan is living off the tragedy of his son. Sad excuse for a human being.
Talk about being blatantly unconstitutional, and violating Heller, Caetano, Bruen and the 2nd Amendment.
Way to give the criminals an upper hand again. At some point you should be able to sue politicians for the reckless laws
Dont you understand mr sullivan, bad people DONT follow laws
They just buy Tesla trucks instead of guns
Because they’re afraid they’re gonna get shot
Anything to take the heat off the dumpster fire leadership
Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. Come on, Sullivan!
Will not comply
This bill won't pass.
So whats next? Ban Glocks or rifles, because they can be modified with a switch so it can shoot full automatic??
As a Democrat I can honestly say, this is the most ridiculous bill. Virtually every police issued handgun has a detachable magazine. There's probably 50 to 100 semi-auto pistols sold to every one revolver. Face Palm.
Do you think banning guns helps anything ??? Look at your democratic cities with the heaviest gun control … crime ridden.
Change your vote.
@jacka55six60 not a chance. Hard pass on "for thee not me"party.
@@scottblack2760 then stick with “ridiculous“
Shouldn't you be saving babies or something hypocrite?
During the time it takes this bill to work thru the legislation ,, won't that have generated a serious sales up-tic in sales of those products?? And has that up-tic already started??
yes
That shooter in in the movie theater had mental issues and told his mental health doctor his plan to kill everyone in that theater and she did not flag him as a risk. If she did, he would’ve been able to buy the gun. When she was asked after she said I thought the drugs would help. Yea if he took them. She should have been held responsible for those deaths! She should have red flagged him and should have let law enforcement know about him and his plan.
Just because something bad happens to you does not give you the right to strip everyone else's rights away
Clear violation of the Supreme Court Bruen decision not to mention the 2nd Amendment.
I'm tired of Colorado trying to be California look what's happed to that state it's disgusting
Leave the law-abiding citizens disadvantaged said against Venezuelan gangs. Ludicrous.
Do we understand how guns even work? What is happening?
No unfortunately we have a bunch of week and pathetic men and women in this country
Yes, criminals will follow the law. Yes!
Wow Calirado
Let's ban clueless boomers instead.
its not the boomers or GEN X. it the milleanials and libtards
If you think for a second, banning detachable magazines won't stop the ability for people to speed reload their guns. Have you seen MA loaders? You can reload a fixed magazine wepon in less than a second. Stop going after our freedom to have fun, and put more effort into stopping shootings before they happen with proper Healthcare and security.
“Shall not be infringed”
Dumbest idea ever.
This type of legislation is exactly what the 2nd amendment is for.
This is the vast majority of guns in common use so it will not survive a legal challenge and enforcement will likely be enjoined by a fed. Court before final ruling. The actual result of this bill will be to stuff the pockets of attorneys with state tax money. Along with the state attorneys, the firms that will bring action to challenge this law will be asking for attorney's fees when they prevail.
They will loose in court........ after every gun store in the state has gone bankrupt.
Ban assault pick-up trucks, vans, and knives.
So will this law make the criminals actually listen now
This is horseshit
This way you won't be able to defend yourself when they come to take your single shot weapons.
This is bullshit. Everyone in Colorado needs to call the governor office and light up the phones and tell him to never sign this shit
My mom is Jewish, who is 97and was a little girl living in the Borders of Germany, still talks about what they did to the Jewish people, being disarmed. Heartbreaking.... 🔯.
Glad I moved to Colorado best thing ever. then after 10 years I was even happier to move out.
SHALL NOT INFRINGE !
When a Blue City/ Blue State manages to succeed to pass this kind of anti-gun bill it will be mirrored to other Blue States/Cities...
Colorado had lead some crazy draconian laws whereas to push state laws to add without changing its state constitution as a free for all and without the people's vote and pass them in legislature of bills created by lawmakers to their heart's desire and is signed off by the Governor or Mayor or laws passed by executive order... Colorado's "Home Rule" Preemption Law and was the first and is commonly shared to be mirrored by other Blue States but there is a setback when Governor Polis had pleaded to other cities to copy a gun policy of his own gun laws to ban open carry, and magazine ban from 15 rounds to 10 rounds for semi-automatic firearms, limiting or making conceal carry more difficult to obtain, increase gun-free zones beyond what is federal/state law are... Polis was disappointed when city/township mayors didn't follow through even as sheriffs around the state counties outside of Denver said they will not comply to any anti-gun laws that takes away law abiding citizens' rights to own and bear arms.
I haven't heard from a Denver sheriff whether he or she will enforce and comply...
Democrats must be wanting to start chaos in Colorado and across the nation to circumvent people's rights under the US Constitution and welcomes the high chance of resistance of protests and riots to armed resistance to a potential civil war conditions?!
Is there going to be a ban on large trucks?
the people told them last year we dont want this..... did they not hear us or do they not care about the will of the people?
And in '23 also ..
Sounds about right for those local "lawmakers" to feel some fear from the people.
Let them have all the guns they want. Just make it life in prison for using one in any crime.
Like that's worked out well
Shall Not Be Infringed...... It says that for tyrants like you people in "power"
Whats the angle on armed gangs?
Wouldn't it be insensitive to deny them basic human rights?
Ban cars, thatll save lives
I wonder what all the people who fought and died to give us these rights would think about this. Using personal tragedy to strip people's rights away from the other people who died to give us those rights is messed up criminals don't follow your laws learn that
so he became a senator after his son lost his life, which im sorry for, but how does that not make this man biased? I mean it seems like a personal agenda, not an agenda for the voters of colorado...
Exactly. That’s the democrats for you though, they make their personal agenda everyone’s agenda
I think he feels guilty for not raising his son to be a protector and teaching him the skills to defend himself and others as a father should. Now instead of taking responsibility for his failures as a father he's shifting the blame to the reason his son and others in the movie theatre died that day is because of an inanimate object.
yeah that first sentence is reason enough to laugh at and mock him
Just no
Illegal
OK, so where’s the line you banned everything the second amendment doesn’t matter does it and then when someone uses a knife or a car to hurt people are you going to ban those to there is no legislating evil out of existence.
How about laws for much speedier trial, harsher sentance for shooters instead of having them wait in jail for years before sentencing.
imagine banning 75%-80% of guns
and 90% of guhn stores
@@jacka55six60 That is a feature, not a problem for antigunners.
I have never seen one single piece of non-politically biased data that shows that any form of gun control would save lives.
Hell no.
Do they realize how many homicides are committed with revolvers? 🤣🤣🤣
They can ban whatever they want it will not stop the black market sales. Putting the law abiding citizens who respect the 2a at an extreme disadvantage when protecting themselves or their homes.
This does nothing.
Is it illegal to buy them in Utah and bring them to Colorado legally?
Only if you legally move to Utah and later legally move back.
Just have to buy magazines without manufacturer dates on them. They can not prove anything.
Wait till they realize deranged shooters approaching a crowded area don’t care about magazine capacity laws. Especially when 3D printed mags just work as good as a normal one.
lol!!! California already tried that crap. This is your tax dollars going to waste instead of actually righting bills that matter.
Isnt that almost every gun on the market? What doesnt have a detatchable mag?
.22lr rifles, shotguns, lever actions that each have a tube magazine, and revolvers. This bill is blatantly unconstitutional, and it makes one wonder at what point does a politician trying to push blatantly illegal bills will get hit with the federal felony of deprivation of rights under color of law.
I can only hope the people of Colorado get what they keep voting for... and are magically immune to the consequences.
Nobody voted for this 😂
30 years ago but reversed
Makes no sense. Shorter mags just makes loading another shorter mag quicker. It doesn’t change anything except ergonomics for the shooter.
That’s like banning the sale of veichles with detachable tires to stop car crashes 😭