Bit unfair to say Oasis killed the scene and listing a load of crap acts, half of which had no tangible link to Oasis like Sleeper and Keane, who merely share the same timeline as them (the latter Oasis went as far as publicly dissing). The fault for that lay with the record companies who signed them up. And eluding back to your point about indie music (i.e. music on independent labels), its because the record labels were no longer independent in essence, like the Rough Trades and the Factories etc. The British music industry could no longer sustain genuine independent labels, the same way as they barely could before Rough Trade
Oasis may have been predictable, retro, a guitar-based echo from Rubber Soul, but they wrote memorable songs, with catchy lyrics, that became anthems for a nation. At the time music had fallen into a deep well of tuneless mind-thumping dance music. Oasis wrote songs that Brits love to sing. Their success was totally justified. Liam Gallagher was a snarling, sneering, savage, a lad with the soul of the streets worn on his tongue. He shocked and dared to be proud to be himself. But more than this, beneath his bravado was a voice, with all the nasal twang of Lennon, the plantive delivery of a spoken song. Yet, it was unique, both easy to follow and compelling to hear. Liam remains one of the UK's most underrated singers. If you have not heard his rendition of Weller's 'Fresh Carnation' then you may not yet appreciate how brilliant Liam's delivery can be. From the moment he pushes out his first line, he has mastery over the song and demonstrates, how unique a vocalist he is. Like Jagger before him, he may not be a great singer, but he sure can sell a song.
For me, Ocean Colour Scene were the unsung heroes of that era. They had it all. The musicianship, lyrics, Simon's voice, energy, beauty. Though they had the same creativity/awesomeness trajectory as Oasis. 2 great albums before nose diving into the ground.
I agree with some of what you are saying. I wouldn't lay the blame solely at Oasis' feet. For me, by the time they were releasing singles like "Roll With It" they were irrelevant. We'd seen and heard everything they had to offer...the rest is garbage, and I mean all of it, every song, including all of the dreary solo efforts. People love a bit of nostalgia, love to try and recapture a moment from their youth. That is what Oasis offer. They are the ultimate heritage act. Completely safe, conservative, solid..a good night out on the piss, a curry then off home to pay the babysitter. They have always been overrated with some OK songs and good timing, as in right band, right era. Slade, Status Quo, The Sweet Oasis...all the same.
I loved Oasis when they came on the scene, the first album was quite something, I really liked the songs, it was noisy like punk, but slower, a bit like grunge but more rooted in British rock music. I could identify with them, when I couldn't with grunge (grunge is VERY American, and from a harmonic point of view, it breaks all the rules, and even though there are some masterpieces, imo in many cases it makes for very disjointed compositions that are not interesting to sing or revisit, then the only thing left is the 'grunge sound' but we got tired of it, even disgusted, within two years). So I was a fan of Oasis. However it was short lived, By the second album (with all the hits) I was already disappointed. And the 3rd album was a disaster, I moved on. I still think that Oasis had something unique (at least when they started, before they became a parody of themselves), but that other band who would come after and sound anything like Oasis would be just totally unbearable to listen it.
@@simontunnicliffe2107 I think the second album is great but it's also very different from the first album. It's not so much that Noel refined his songwriting skills, it's more of a conscious departure from the raw sound of the first album. So it's just a matter of taste, and I get the second album definitely had more potential for huge commercial success (the first album was a huge debut album but mainly In the UK, while the second album sent them to global stardom). There are songs that I dislike on the second album, like Roll With It, and even the song Morning Glory, are quite disappointing, they are the first signs announcing what would become of Oasis (tired and having to resort to parodying themselves). I think a band like Stereophonics was kind of post Britpop and sounded like a version of Oasis that I disliked. Granted I don't think they were bad or anything, it's just something I found very annoying at that point in time.. And another example is the Verve, now that's' a band that I could never stand.
I absolutely love how Oasis live rent free in the heads of their haters. Especially when they are so triggered that they go and make a RUclips video about them. It's just hilarious! :)
OCS was the greatest band around in those days, but calling oasis shit is a bit of a push :D i don's listen to them alot but they do have some great tracks, noel is good at what he does
OCS had the better singer, the better lyrics, the better musicianship, the better melodies, the better riffs. The only thing Oasis could match with Ocean Colour scene was their career trajectory.
Youth culture changed after the millenium.There is no longer a geneartion gap and I don't believe young people view music as a vehicle to express themselves, their identity and their social / political views as maybe was the case in the decades up to the millenium. Social Media has transcended and dwarfed the importance that music use to hold as being in the forefront of a young person's psyche. The youth of today do not need musicians and whatever genre tribes to speak for them or represent them. They don't need a Morrissey or an Ian brown or even a Bowie or a Madonna. Social Media enables the youth to be their own stars and the world orbits around them. Music culture is a relic of the past. Just as us indie kids in the 1980'd scoffed at our parents genaration of crooners and big bands and maybe rock n roll. Music really is a dead culture.
👍 fair comment dude . social media is a powerful tool for social engineering . i hope we see a turnaround. it's a bit of a culture war on us. our culture is being stolen away . doesn't fit in with the dystopian future the world leaders have planned for us. ☝️ seriously
Noel right now: "Fuck guys, that fella on RUclips that wears a shite shirt, pubes for hair and favours he lives in a basement from the 80s said we're shite. Better give up the reunion."
Can't stand Oasis. The British music press bigged them and Blur up because American music had risen with grunge and British music was dead. The amount of songs Noel has ripped off from other bands is criminal. Can't stand Liam's voice either.
But how did grunge rise? And what killed it? Nirvana. And like Oasis, good songs, but most of them even bigger rip offs than Oasis did. Do your research.
@@thadonis. Eh?! American alternative music going back to the late 80s with bands like RHCP and Faith No More was doing good business everywhere. Then Grunge happened and British music was dead in the water. Nirvana may have been have influenced by The Pixies and one or two other bands but the likes of them, Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, STP and The Smashing Pumpkins were miles better and more original than Oasis. Noel's Beatles obsession in particular was cringe. Don't look back in Anger rips off Imagine, Wonderwall, their most overrated song, was ripped off from George Harrison, All Around the World rips off Strawberry Fields Forever, they mention 'Yellow Submarine' in Supersonic, She's Electric is A Little Help from My Friends. They rip off All the Young Dudes in Stand by Me, Cigarettes and Alcohol is Bang a Gong. Shakermaker is a rip off, What's the Story Morning Glory is The One I Love by REM. There are more examples but these are the most blatant. They are a tribute band, and not even a good one.
Well, you don't know them. You're a grown man making assumptions about them personally because you don't like their public persona. I'm fairly certain Noel on the telly is a different person when around his kids. It's a persona, no different than any other celebrity. I know people who have fallen in love to 'Slide Away'. Fallen in LOVE. It doesn't matter how 'mediocre' Oasis are as musicians, when you have that level of ability to make people bond over your art, you're great. Oasis helped an entire generation bond. For a 'mediocre' musician, Noel sure has inspired many to pick up a guitar, that's the thing that puzzles me. Remember when Bob Dylans first three albums were open chord flatpicked G B A- D variations played until infinite? I guess his simplicity and (therefore) mediocrity of his work is beneath you also. Noel can't play like Clapton or Vai so he's mediocre. Got it. Sod the fact he saved guitar music in the 90's and that his brother made Jagger look like Eddie Izzard.
@@deadseagull-xf3lk you have a point. I don’t hate them tho, I just don’t like them, their persona and their sing along songs. They’re pop for that reason, bringing masses together is not always been a great thing (see 20th century)..they’re just normal Joes on the scumbag side of the spectrum that made consumable songs for masses, consumable, not mind blowing. But again that’s my taste and my opinion so don’t take it like the gospel :) just had to write it down for some reason 😂
@@aydolnunguna7612see my other reply, it’s just about taste, it’s your favourite band I see, good for you. I see a band of scumbags wannabe strumming around four chords and getting to masses for their simplicity, nothing wrong with that, just not for me…
Agree,stone roses far superior,oasis first 2 albums plus master plan had some decent songs on them,but def maybe and morning glory are not a patch on the second coming and the first self titled.could of seen them at Milton Keynes years ago for nothing but said not a chance rather play a Coldplay album who are again way better than oasis,music is subjective by the way so don’t shoot the messenger,…even thou I’m right!!❤️🇬🇬🎸
This is good stuff. Oasis are The anti Smiths - everything is the fields of Athenry. But acts they inspired were awful for sure. Menswear etc landfill indie - is a good term 🎉 Nothing instrumentally interesting
As someone that likes oasis and a great deal of the other bands you mentioned, I appreciate your ideas and your discussion about the trajectory of British music from the 80’s to the early 90’s. I don’t know if you are an author, but I’d read a book if you wrote it.
Oasis a kind of embarrassing homage to the late 60s . Drivel lyrics and lifted ideas . A deeply depressing derivative band . Perhaps could have raided a charity shop for fancy dress and done a local pub gig on 60s night but should never have gone any further with the idea . Sad
are oasis doing a new album or even a new single? if not well liam has been doing the oasis stuff live for ages they only broke up in 2009 is it that much of a big deal? if new stuff is coming fine
They are so c**p it's amazing. Noel knows 6 chords and all their songs are based on the major pentatonic scale which country music and what folk is based on....A truly awful boy band....But fair play to them for mugging off all the unemployed into parting with their benefits during the 90's
@theblackwidowchronicles Listen to "all the young dudes" by mott the Hoople - most Oasis songs are basically a variation of that song but with awful lyrics !
@@simontunnicliffe2107 Yes I play like the ghost of Hendrix and you clearly don't. Noel even famously said he didn't know what the first chord in wonderwall was....utter shiteeee
That 89-93 period was much better for Indie music.Then things picked up for a bit from 96-98. Oasis were very pretentious and thought they were better than they were which set things back a bit.
@@Chris-zq6ky When the greatest band in the world is unstoppable, media, entertainment and haters will do anything to bring oasis down. And it's very funny that when the Beatles ripping off other artist songs, they called it Borrowed. WTF! 😂😂😂
@@thebrownnotereview8473 Thanks I’ll give them a listen, on the flip side could I ask you listen to “the gulps”? I heard them in bodega in Nottingham last year as a warm up band and they where fantastic
British music and music in general was crap long before Oasis. All Oasis did was to confirm that music was crap by becoming so successful. In the 50s and 60's Oasis wouldn't have got a look in. Music to be inspired by, is over I'm afraid. The Stone Roses were just as crap and just as annoying, but rightfully not successful.
@@garym53 musical taste doesn't exist in isolation, there is a reason for it. Oasis were crap. Crap singing, crap guitar playing, crap songs, crap lyrics.
@@jupitermoongauge4055 the Lyrics were amongst the worst of all time . .'Im gonna take my car and drive real far...were not concerned about the way we are' . .-inspired !!!! lol
This video was sponsored by Blur™
Bit unfair to say Oasis killed the scene and listing a load of crap acts, half of which had no tangible link to Oasis like Sleeper and Keane, who merely share the same timeline as them (the latter Oasis went as far as publicly dissing). The fault for that lay with the record companies who signed them up. And eluding back to your point about indie music (i.e. music on independent labels), its because the record labels were no longer independent in essence, like the Rough Trades and the Factories etc. The British music industry could no longer sustain genuine independent labels, the same way as they barely could before Rough Trade
Oasis may have been predictable, retro, a guitar-based echo from Rubber Soul, but they wrote memorable songs, with catchy lyrics, that became anthems for a nation. At the time music had fallen into a deep well of tuneless mind-thumping dance music. Oasis wrote songs that Brits love to sing. Their success was totally justified. Liam Gallagher was a snarling, sneering, savage, a lad with the soul of the streets worn on his tongue. He shocked and dared to be proud to be himself. But more than this, beneath his bravado was a voice, with all the nasal twang of Lennon, the plantive delivery of a spoken song. Yet, it was unique, both easy to follow and compelling to hear. Liam remains one of the UK's most underrated singers. If you have not heard his rendition of Weller's 'Fresh Carnation' then you may not yet appreciate how brilliant Liam's delivery can be. From the moment he pushes out his first line, he has mastery over the song and demonstrates, how unique a vocalist he is. Like Jagger before him, he may not be a great singer, but he sure can sell a song.
Simon Cowell killed British Music(and American too, for that matter), you're just trying to be controversial.
For me, Ocean Colour Scene were the unsung heroes of that era. They had it all. The musicianship, lyrics, Simon's voice, energy, beauty. Though they had the same creativity/awesomeness trajectory as Oasis. 2 great albums before nose diving into the ground.
I agree with some of what you are saying. I wouldn't lay the blame solely at Oasis' feet. For me, by the time they were releasing singles like "Roll With It" they were irrelevant. We'd seen and heard everything they had to offer...the rest is garbage, and I mean all of it, every song, including all of the dreary solo efforts. People love a bit of nostalgia, love to try and recapture a moment from their youth. That is what Oasis offer. They are the ultimate heritage act. Completely safe, conservative, solid..a good night out on the piss, a curry then off home to pay the babysitter. They have always been overrated with some OK songs and good timing, as in right band, right era. Slade, Status Quo, The Sweet Oasis...all the same.
He doesn't really lay any blame at Oasis' feet. He just described what happened.
Spot on. I'd like to add, that Status Quo are a tad more original.
Old man yells at clouds... Just let people enjoy the comeback. Why not focus on bands you like instead?
I loved Oasis when they came on the scene, the first album was quite something, I really liked the songs, it was noisy like punk, but slower, a bit like grunge but more rooted in British rock music. I could identify with them, when I couldn't with grunge (grunge is VERY American, and from a harmonic point of view, it breaks all the rules, and even though there are some masterpieces, imo in many cases it makes for very disjointed compositions that are not interesting to sing or revisit, then the only thing left is the 'grunge sound' but we got tired of it, even disgusted, within two years).
So I was a fan of Oasis. However it was short lived, By the second album (with all the hits) I was already disappointed. And the 3rd album was a disaster, I moved on.
I still think that Oasis had something unique (at least when they started, before they became a parody of themselves), but that other band who would come after and sound anything like Oasis would be just totally unbearable to listen it.
The 2nd album was on par if not better than the 1st and what band that came after that sounded like them?
@@simontunnicliffe2107 I think the second album is great but it's also very different from the first album. It's not so much that Noel refined his songwriting skills, it's more of a conscious departure from the raw sound of the first album. So it's just a matter of taste, and I get the second album definitely had more potential for huge commercial success (the first album was a huge debut album but mainly In the UK, while the second album sent them to global stardom).
There are songs that I dislike on the second album, like Roll With It, and even the song Morning Glory, are quite disappointing, they are the first signs announcing what would become of Oasis (tired and having to resort to parodying themselves).
I think a band like Stereophonics was kind of post Britpop and sounded like a version of Oasis that I disliked. Granted I don't think they were bad or anything, it's just something I found very annoying at that point in time..
And another example is the Verve, now that's' a band that I could never stand.
spot-on ..in bed with the Labour party -thats why they are back now.Tony Blair called in a favour from his old mate Noel ...
I absolutely love how Oasis live rent free in the heads of their haters. Especially when they are so triggered that they go and make a RUclips video about them. It's just hilarious! :)
OCS was the greatest band around in those days, but calling oasis shit is a bit of a push :D i don's listen to them alot but they do have some great tracks, noel is good at what he does
@martinricketts9708 Oasis were certainly better than Ocean colour scene....but then most bands are !
@@revol148Agreed, Ocean Colour Scene were fantastic but not in the same league as Oasis, The Verve or Manic Street Preachers etc
OCS had the better singer, the better lyrics, the better musicianship, the better melodies, the better riffs. The only thing Oasis could match with Ocean Colour scene was their career trajectory.
what Lick Tony Blairs bum . .-that was unforgivable to British people . . .
If Oasis are shite how come they sold so many records and had a worldwide following? You don’t seem to like any band pre 80’s
a quick scroll through this channel would answer that, which is 90% post 2018
Popularity and high record sales doesn't always mean good.
Westlife ? Mr Blobby ? Des O'Connor ?
Some people are clueless
Your view is personal to you
But really by the reaction this explains your opinion doesn’t even matter
All of these blokes should be forced to upload a tune that they have written and performed themselves
Youth culture changed after the millenium.There is no longer a geneartion gap and I don't believe young people view music as a vehicle to express themselves, their identity and their social / political views as maybe was the case in the decades up to the millenium. Social Media has transcended and dwarfed the importance that music use to hold as being in the forefront of a young person's psyche. The youth of today do not need musicians and whatever genre tribes to speak for them or represent them. They don't need a Morrissey or an Ian brown or even a Bowie or a Madonna. Social Media enables the youth to be their own stars and the world orbits around them. Music culture is a relic of the past. Just as us indie kids in the 1980'd scoffed at our parents genaration of crooners and big bands and maybe rock n roll. Music really is a dead culture.
👍 fair comment dude . social media is a powerful tool for social engineering . i hope we see a turnaround. it's a bit of a culture war on us. our culture is being stolen away . doesn't fit in with the dystopian future the world leaders have planned for us. ☝️ seriously
The Smashing pumpkins were never grunge Billy Corgan has constantly tried to distance himself from the label
did i say that? dont remember
They’ll be gutted when they see this.
Noel right now:
"Fuck guys, that fella on RUclips that wears a shite shirt, pubes for hair and favours he lives in a basement from the 80s said we're shite. Better give up the reunion."
I think Damon Albarn said they're the musical equivalent of beans on toast. I agree: bland, boring but good for plebs to munch on.
Can't stand Oasis. The British music press bigged them and Blur up because American music had risen with grunge and British music was dead. The amount of songs Noel has ripped off from other bands is criminal. Can't stand Liam's voice either.
But how did grunge rise? And what killed it? Nirvana. And like Oasis, good songs, but most of them even bigger rip offs than Oasis did. Do your research.
@@thadonis. Eh?! American alternative music going back to the late 80s with bands like RHCP and Faith No More was doing good business everywhere. Then Grunge happened and British music was dead in the water. Nirvana may have been have influenced by The Pixies and one or two other bands but the likes of them, Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, STP and The Smashing Pumpkins were miles better and more original than Oasis. Noel's Beatles obsession in particular was cringe. Don't look back in Anger rips off Imagine, Wonderwall, their most overrated song, was ripped off from George Harrison, All Around the World rips off Strawberry Fields Forever, they mention 'Yellow Submarine' in Supersonic, She's Electric is A Little Help from My Friends. They rip off All the Young Dudes in Stand by Me, Cigarettes and Alcohol is Bang a Gong. Shakermaker is a rip off, What's the Story Morning Glory is The One I Love by REM. There are more examples but these are the most blatant. They are a tribute band, and not even a good one.
Does their music keep you up all night?
are young people into oasis? all the people i know who are looking forward to seeing them again are middle aged guys who liked them first time around
I really think they don't give a shite
Oasis are the reason a lot of people listen to music
They’re mediocre musicians and mediocre people…sorry (not sorry) for all the Oasis fans…
Well, you don't know them. You're a grown man making assumptions about them personally because you don't like their public persona. I'm fairly certain Noel on the telly is a different person when around his kids. It's a persona, no different than any other celebrity. I know people who have fallen in love to 'Slide Away'. Fallen in LOVE. It doesn't matter how 'mediocre' Oasis are as musicians, when you have that level of ability to make people bond over your art, you're great. Oasis helped an entire generation bond. For a 'mediocre' musician, Noel sure has inspired many to pick up a guitar, that's the thing that puzzles me. Remember when Bob Dylans first three albums were open chord flatpicked G B A- D variations played until infinite? I guess his simplicity and (therefore) mediocrity of his work is beneath you also. Noel can't play like Clapton or Vai so he's mediocre. Got it. Sod the fact he saved guitar music in the 90's and that his brother made Jagger look like Eddie Izzard.
@@davidesimone5760 Jelly bird. Haters just can't stand Oasis is the greatest band in the world. 😂😂😂
@@deadseagull-xf3lk you have a point. I don’t hate them tho, I just don’t like them, their persona and their sing along songs. They’re pop for that reason, bringing masses together is not always been a great thing (see 20th century)..they’re just normal Joes on the scumbag side of the spectrum that made consumable songs for masses, consumable, not mind blowing. But again that’s my taste and my opinion so don’t take it like the gospel :) just had to write it down for some reason 😂
@@aydolnunguna7612see my other reply, it’s just about taste, it’s your favourite band I see, good for you. I see a band of scumbags wannabe strumming around four chords and getting to masses for their simplicity, nothing wrong with that, just not for me…
@@aydolnunguna7612 The church is the greatest ignored band still playing. 44 years and still genius songs.
Agree,stone roses far superior,oasis first 2 albums plus master plan had some decent songs on them,but def maybe and morning glory are not a patch on the second coming and the first self titled.could of seen them at Milton Keynes years ago for nothing but said not a chance rather play a Coldplay album who are again way better than oasis,music is subjective by the way so don’t shoot the messenger,…even thou I’m right!!❤️🇬🇬🎸
playback speed of
Agreed!! (also 1.25 is perfect for this!)
They also support 115 FC
🩵
This is good stuff. Oasis are The anti Smiths - everything is the fields of Athenry. But acts they inspired were awful for sure. Menswear etc landfill indie - is a good term 🎉
Nothing instrumentally interesting
@shaycostello888 there are some great articles on landfill indie
God menswear! I forgot about them
As someone that likes oasis and a great deal of the other bands you mentioned, I appreciate your ideas and your discussion about the trajectory of British music from the 80’s to the early 90’s. I don’t know if you are an author, but I’d read a book if you wrote it.
@user-gy8xe1om3o probably the nicest thing anyone has said about me!
I wasn't too hard on them really
id say the coral are the last great british band
@lennon1482 when you typed Coral I'm assuming you meant Suede?
@@revol148 oh come on don't be daft
Oasis a kind of embarrassing homage to the late 60s . Drivel lyrics and lifted ideas . A deeply depressing derivative band . Perhaps could have raided a charity shop for fancy dress and done a local pub gig on 60s night but should never have gone any further with the idea . Sad
are oasis doing a new album or even a new single? if not well liam has been doing the oasis stuff live for ages they only broke up in 2009 is it that much of a big deal? if new stuff is coming fine
They are so c**p it's amazing. Noel knows 6 chords and all their songs are based on the major pentatonic scale which country music and what folk is based on....A truly awful boy band....But fair play to them for mugging off all the unemployed into parting with their benefits during the 90's
@theblackwidowchronicles Listen to "all the young dudes" by mott the Hoople - most Oasis songs are basically a variation of that song but with awful lyrics !
What complete crap, Wonderwall on it's own has 6 chords, d'you even play guitar? I could list at least 20 odd chords he uses.
@@simontunnicliffe2107 Yes I play like the ghost of Hendrix and you clearly don't. Noel even famously said he didn't know what the first chord in wonderwall was....utter shiteeee
a bit of slade thrown in ...'cmon feel the noise' which was dreadful in its own right .. .
That 89-93 period was much better for Indie music.Then things picked up for a bit from 96-98. Oasis were very pretentious and thought they were better than they were which set things back a bit.
Fair enough mate
Who are the 5-6 new bands who are making great music nowadays?
@@Chris-zq6ky black midi, squid, black country new road, working mens club, dry cleaning
@@Chris-zq6ky When the greatest band in the world is unstoppable, media, entertainment and haters will do anything to bring oasis down. And it's very funny that when the Beatles ripping off other artist songs, they called it Borrowed. WTF! 😂😂😂
@@thebrownnotereview8473 Thanks I’ll give them a listen, on the flip side could I ask you listen to “the gulps”?
I heard them in bodega in Nottingham last year as a warm up band and they where fantastic
@@thebrownnotereview8473 flipping heck I haven't heard of any of those bands and I listen to BBC6 music !
British music and music in general was crap long before Oasis. All Oasis did was to confirm that music was crap by becoming so successful. In the 50s and 60's Oasis wouldn't have got a look in. Music to be inspired by, is over I'm afraid. The Stone Roses were just as crap and just as annoying, but rightfully not successful.
the Last great era was the 70s . . . .for anything , music, film, tv shows ..
Last seriously great band. Better than Radiohead and Coldplay.
Oasis were a dumbed down band playing dumbed down music for dumbed down people. The teletubbies of rock n roll
@@garym53 musical taste doesn't exist in isolation, there is a reason for it. Oasis were crap. Crap singing, crap guitar playing, crap songs, crap lyrics.
@@jupitermoongauge4055 I’m my opinion you are wrong.
@@jupitermoongauge4055 crap is such a vulgar word for someone of your far superior intellect
@@garym53 no other word describes oasis so succinctly and accurately than crap
@@jupitermoongauge4055 the Lyrics were amongst the worst of all time . .'Im gonna take my car and drive real far...were not concerned about the way we are' . .-inspired !!!! lol
Oasis is The greatest band in the world and the only brit band that can win a war. The rest are softies 😂
@aydolnunguna7612 they'd stop half way through and start fighting each other
I reckon Jarvis could take em both
@@thebrownnotereview8473 Do you know what I mean? 😂😂😂
Smiths are hard as nails ❤ and as soft as pillows 🎉
@@shaycostello888 Nah! When someone invades, they will run. Their songs won't make your balls grow. 😂
@@aydolnunguna7612 Queen is dead is hard af
please also enjoy my stellar review of the modern classic liam and john squire album
ruclips.net/video/B2w9dMn4c28/видео.html