Hartford Schroeder was handed a Princess Title on a silver platter all willy nilly. CA sends her photo to BP, announcing. here's Lilly. Bio-Mom Stassi admits she let's MM use Hartford to portray Lilly. Screenshots Taken of All
They cannot be in the LOS, as the child must be 'born of the body', not rented or even surrogate. Hazard himself needs to be removed though. MM desperately wants to be queen which is only possible if Haz is king. Her extreme ambition makes me afraid for the Wales' safety.
Why gave they not been? I do not think in a constitutional monarchy, the government and the palace courtiers are less astute than we Royal Roguies. Everything has looked "off" since the sliding baby bump(s) of the first "pregnancy". And what's up w/ the hysterectomy stories? It just seems odd that if HALF of this weirdness around the Sussex children is even HALF true, that there has been nothing coming from palace or gov't officials. Instead, the two children are given Prince and Princess titles. The British secret service surely knows whatever there is to know. The public may never know the whole story......but I surely am VERY curious. 😕😮
@@oldtiredm53The children weren't 'given' anything it was automatic according to the law. Do you really think that our Royal Family, our Government and all our security officials together are not as bright as posters on social media?
@@farmgirl6866 I have been watching Vanderpump for 11 years. I’m very familiar with Stassi and Beau. That is NOT their baby. But I’m sure Stassi is flattered.
Why did the royals say they have never met Archie? Why would a professional photographer not set his time correctly on his camera? Why would there be a hold on this photo? Too many questions....
@Bluebougainvillea Tyler Perry has said "I have not met Lili, no one has met Lili". You would think her "godfather" at least would have met her. Archie probably belongs to Just Sparry, he certainly isn't hers bc I watched the Archie moonbump drop to her knees
Could someone please tell me if there was a 2nd South Park episode (even if they were the topic for a shorter time). I have looked everywhere and I can not find anything more than the 2023 "World Privacy Tour". Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated. - Much Love & Cheers NYC
Allegedly Catherine arrived in a car in a blue dress for that Christening photo but within a few minutes is in a pink dress sitting down in the picture.
Doll. Moves when pressing side of arm. Photo of the Queen and Prince Philip faked also. Queen wouldn’t wear what she was wearing in photo to greet grandchild or for a christening.
I feel that having that amount of $$$ can buy you anything. The sad thing is, these two don't know how to be discrete with their purchases. Had they brought their kids out, in a more normal fashion, none of us would be asking any questions. They are the Odd Couple in the Worst Horror Costumes of Nasty Personalities.
That picture never happened in real life. It is absolutely photoshopped imo. It is very strange how this woman allegedly gave birth in complete secrecy twice, had 2 christenings in complete secrecy, two birth certificates that are questionable of two children that nobody in the general public has ever seen.
No doctor signed off on Archie's birth the first and only time that's happened with a royal birth. The doctor Meghan claimed delivered Archie was out of the country on family holiday when he was born. Archie's birth certificate list mother as the Dutchess of Sussex with no name Harry's full name & title are listed as father. Odd indeed.
Let's get real...I'd like to know what the charade is all about...I guess she didn't want the RF to know that she had a hysterectomy and therefore could not produce any royal children with Hazzy...😮
Spencer ladies were raised as aristocrats and have been around RF all their lives. Lady Jane would never attend a royal event in casual clothes and Panama hat
@@janefairless7410 If she had some secateurs handy she could prune a few roses in that hat. There are multiple pictures of her wearing some very stylish hats.
A different child every pic, or the same really old ones. The hair colour goes from brown, red, to blonde for the boy. Hardly any pics of "lili", the same one of August in the blue suit.
Always thought it was a photoshopped picture. Princess Catherine would never have worn that colour to a Christening. The ladies usually wear white or cream, except M of course to Prince Louis’s because she wanted to stand out.
Markle stood out all right at Louis’s christening. She looked like an olive with toothpick legs. Just a tiny contrast to the pickle dress when the suggested colors were red,white,or blue.
@@mischa9587 .......she far TOO CONTROLLING to ever hire/pay anybody else to dress her - and it shows. ONLY at the very beginning of their "relationship when she was just worming her way into the R.F. did she ever look suitably attired.
Check the reflection in the mirror! The Queen was not there and said she never met Archificial! So there is that! I would take the QE11 words over Me-Again! Also why are William and Kate floating and fuzzy?
True, but the only photo I've seen with the late Queen and Archie together was the Christening photo. *The Queen wasn't anywhere near close enough to actually SEE the baby*
The Pat Tillman Award, honoring AMERICAN veteran war hero Pat Tillman, who was killed in Afghanistan, should go to a deserving AMERICAN - not to BRITISH Prince Harry! Please sign the petition "Request ESPN to Rethink Awarding the Pat Tillman Award to BRITISH Prince Harry" Only 670 signatures needed to get to 68,000 signatures! The award should be given to a deserving AMERICAN veteran! Make your voice heard! We can do this! There's strength in numbers! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
There was no christening. There is no way the Queen and Catherine would ever wear those clothes. When the Sussex Squad was berating Catherine about her photo, I asked about these photos.
Many people have noticed the photo was manipulated. just the incorrect christening dress for many of those "guests", then onto the missing chair legs, and the out of scale people . .
It's so blatantly photoshopped as to be ridiculous. Not only would Catherine be at least 7' tall, she is hovering on that chair! She is also wearing amazing shoes, with only one heel.. ... , Lady Jane is wearing a gardening hat here, but the funniest is that ' archie' has a FOOT for a hand! That bulge behind the fingers is a heel. The only other photoshopped Harkle photo is the very weird one of them with ' the children' [ a Christmas photo?] where MM has at least 7 toes.
If photo is real, I believe Princess Catherine purposely wear this outfit because when Prince Louis was christened, Meghan wore that olive outfit instead of the following the light colors the others wore 🇺🇸
Since Sidley Twins dad reviewed that picture with the "children" and pointed out all the photoshop fails the Harkles haven't put out pictures. Lol!😅😂🎉 Yay Sidley dad!❤
Princess Catherine, bless her heart. The poor woman grimaces in photos with Meghan. This portrait of the family is giving off major tension. Meghan has that effect on everyone she meets.
Sorry, you're forgetting perspective. Objects or living things closer to the camera or viewer appear larger than objects or living things further away from the camera or viewer. Even in short distances. William is behind and further away from the camera than Catherine, so she looks larger. Look at how Harry seems huge compared to his admittedly short mother in law, and the Queen looks larger than King Charles. Perspective is how the eye sees and judges distance.
Always knew that Photo of alleged Christian it was photoshopped, look at the size of Princess Catherine as well, also Queen Camilla as well as Prince William and the mirror. Not forget there was no way the Archbishop of Canterbury attended for the Ceremony he was a long way away at some other Church function he needed to be, he couldn’t possibly be in two places as the same time.
Jesus, are you saying that photo wasn't photoshopped? Hazard didn't know how old his son is 2 days or 2 weeks. Their intention is to promote artificial is for real 🤷 Unfortunately, they were caught out lying for 6yrs and, even if they told the truth, I would not believe it. The boy who cried wolf.
The date of Archie's christening was July 6 2019, but the date of the original photo of this occasion was May 8 2019???? Are Meghan and Harry able to time travel?
Take a look at tge photo when the Queen and Prince Phillip with Doria staring down at so called baby Archie. Danja Zone said immediately the Queen and Prince Phillip was cut & pasted.
Harry and Megan's faces look as if they have been through a filter. They are both so smooth and shiny without a wrinkle or a spot. Also, Harry has hair.
The first thing I noticed which I can’t take my eyes off, is the size of Catherine. She is HUGE and out of proportion to everyone else. I’m sure this photo has been manipulated. Regarding Camilla’s outfit - the decoration could easily have been “removed” using photoshop and other slight alterations made. I think it’s the same outfit.
Imo, this entire pic was photoshopped. I don't think this event ever took place. P.S. Coincidentally, I was watching Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" when this video popped up. I don't believe in "coincidences." Also, Hitchcock was a perfectionist and paid enormous attention to every single detail. He said that filming a movie was boring since he had already story boarded it prior. You, Jesus, have that same keen eye and perfectionism. 🧐🧐💜💜
I thought someone had pointed out that the actual clock in that room was much smaller than the one in the picture. I wonder what time was on that clock, if this allegation was true. Zara has said no one in the RF ever met Archie Harrison/Harry's son - maybe she did not include the christening as a meeting
The way the figures are grouped always made me think that they maybe intended to crop out Charles, Camilla, William and Catherine at some stage in the future, and have just the parents and baby, backed by Doria and Diana’s two sisters!!
There's no way I will ever believe this " christening pic" is authentic. The Bishop of Canterbury who was supposed to officiate the event was in another part of the country at the time of supposed "christening". Different child for the black and white "christening" photo as well.
I wonder, was there a dress color code for the ladies to wear. What would happen if Princess Catherine wore shocking pink dress instead of the pastel? Would it bother Meghan, since Meghan used to wear an outfit of a different color than the rest of the people in the picture to stand out or was it to be a rebel.
All the people beside and behind the couch were added later. You can clearly see...Harry wanted a picture with him megan and archie alone but that was not wjat the RF wanted so they were added so the pictire couldbe released to the public. This is not the Monarchy of Harry... 😂
I realise Catherine is in the front of the others, but she seems so much bigger than everyone else. I know she is tall, but her face is bigger than the others???? I think - if anything - she was photoshopped in.
Развлечения![How Meghan CONTROLS Harry with THIS gesture: [ FLASHBACK ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2ycQXQQzIxY/mqdefault.jpg)
![How Meghan CONTROLS Harry with THIS gesture: [ FLASHBACK ]](/img/tr.png)
Every photo from the two idiots is manipulated.
Agree 100%
BINGO
Agree everything faked.
100% Agree !!!!!!
And they had the gaslight audacity to claim they would never do it!
Nothing these traitors do is ever honest and wholesome. Awful people.
Very well said. 👏👏👏👏
💯🎯
What gets me most is no matter how often she is caught out, she has no shame.
Agree ❤
@@glorysmummy and there are no consequences?
to say Meghan Markle is truthful is like saying Harry is an American hero.
😂truth! 😂
There is no similarity in those statements…you can not make a comparison with out a similarity
Harry no hero!
@@DimWit000 damn right!🇺🇸
@@DimWit000 damn right!🇺🇸
Its time that the birth of their children is investigated and released. They are in line of sucession...
Hartford Schroeder was handed a Princess Title on a silver platter all willy nilly. CA sends her photo to BP, announcing. here's Lilly.
Bio-Mom Stassi admits she let's MM use Hartford to portray Lilly.
Screenshots Taken of All
They cannot be in the LOS, as the child must be 'born of the body', not rented or even surrogate. Hazard himself needs to be removed though. MM desperately wants to be queen which is only possible if Haz is king. Her extreme ambition makes me afraid for the Wales' safety.
Why gave they not been? I do not think in a constitutional monarchy, the government and the palace courtiers are less astute than we Royal Roguies. Everything has looked "off" since the sliding baby bump(s) of the first "pregnancy". And what's up w/ the hysterectomy stories?
It just seems odd that if HALF of this weirdness around the Sussex children is even HALF true, that there has been nothing coming from palace or gov't officials. Instead, the two children are given Prince and Princess titles. The British secret service surely knows whatever there is to know.
The public may never know the whole story......but I surely am VERY curious.
😕😮
@@oldtiredm53The children weren't 'given' anything it was automatic according to the law. Do you really think that our Royal Family, our Government and all our security officials together are not as bright as posters on social media?
@@farmgirl6866 I have been watching Vanderpump for 11 years. I’m very familiar with Stassi and Beau. That is NOT their baby. But I’m sure Stassi is flattered.
Is it just me or does Catherine look like she would be 7 ft tall if she stood up?
Totally agree!
😂😂😂😂😂
Agree...and not a outfit she would wear not her style..m
William is already 7 ft tall lol 😂😂😂😂
BINGO
Why did the royals say they have never met Archie? Why would a professional photographer not set his time correctly on his camera? Why would there be a hold on this photo?
Too many questions....
Don't complain,don't explain! Still protecting Harry!
Además la macumba o sea mm los hubiera acusado de racistas
The RF knew that MM couldn't keep up the farce of these fake kids for long - because eventually the kiddos grow up & can speak for themselves
Pretty sure all the royals have not said they have never met Archie.
@Bluebougainvillea Tyler Perry has said "I have not met Lili, no one has met Lili". You would think her "godfather" at least would have met her. Archie probably belongs to Just Sparry, he certainly isn't hers bc I watched the Archie moonbump drop to her knees
the Sussex’s getting so angry about the South Park episode about them,only proves it was 💯% true.
A narcissist is the angriest when they have been found out !
Could someone please tell me if there was a 2nd South Park episode (even if they were the topic for a shorter time). I have looked everywhere and I can not find anything more than the 2023 "World Privacy Tour". Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated. - Much Love & Cheers NYC
@@firstlastname7437 How true.....how true. Actually scary and nasty.
👍
But never dared to sue. Lol
I always thought it was photoshopped. Catherine doesn’t look right!
Not a outfit she would wear not her style...
Allegedly Catherine arrived in a car in a blue dress for that Christening photo but within a few minutes is in a pink dress sitting down in the picture.
I don't think she wears dresses that short.
@childrenpraisegod1230 I wouldn't be surprised if that video was from some other event that MM tried to say was from the christening.
That is not a two day old baby!
SHE BORROWED THAT KID, SHE WAS NEVER PREGNANT.
Doll. Moves when pressing side of arm. Photo of the Queen and Prince Philip faked also. Queen wouldn’t wear what she was wearing in photo to greet grandchild or for a christening.
I feel that having that amount of $$$ can buy you anything. The sad thing is, these two don't know how to be discrete with their purchases. Had they brought their kids out, in a more normal fashion, none of us would be asking any questions. They are the Odd Couple in the Worst Horror Costumes of Nasty Personalities.
@@abuelitachichi2012 Said enough now prove it!!
100% true MM’s breasts never grew +/filled with milk!
I'm with you.
The audacity of the skidmarkles and their bully gang to call out Princes Catherine about her tiny tweeks when EVERY SINGLE photo of them is just WRONG
Tulip I know I sat shouting at my phone you had photographs of yourself with a false pregnancy bump how bloody dare you spout that about the princess
This photo is fake as can be. Disappointed in Jesus over this one
That picture never happened in real life. It is absolutely photoshopped imo. It is very strange how this woman allegedly gave birth in complete secrecy twice, had 2 christenings in complete secrecy, two birth certificates that are questionable of two children that nobody in the general public has ever seen.
And no one has ever witnessed those actual children IRL
Why is she hiding her children?
No doctor signed off on Archie's birth the first and only time that's happened with a royal birth.
The doctor Meghan claimed delivered Archie was out of the country on family holiday when he was born.
Archie's birth certificate list mother as the Dutchess of Sussex with no name Harry's full name & title are listed as father.
Odd indeed.
@stephenpmurphy591 the doctor that allegedly was reported to deliver Betty has gone out of business???😂
Let's get real...I'd like to know what the charade is all about...I guess she didn't want the RF to know that she had a hysterectomy and therefore could not produce any royal children with Hazzy...😮
Everyone knows this photo is fake - there was no RF christening for Archie whoever he may be
H&M couldn’t even produce a legal birth certificate
Catherine would be extremely tall if she stood up 😂
She hasent growen but she has lost weight with herillness. Sheus not a short person
@@daylehudson6810 This was supposed to be years ago, not present so her illness isn't involved.
At this point,
WHAT, haven’t these Two Grifters
NOT MANIPULATED??!!??!!??!!
The Archbishop of Canterbury was presiding at the General Synod in York that day. He cannot have christened Archificial.
Aye to that 👍
I don’t think Harry’s aunt Jane would wear that hat to a christening. It looks like it’s meghans yachting availability hat. iMO
Spencer ladies were raised as aristocrats and have been around RF all their lives. Lady Jane would never attend a royal event in casual clothes and Panama hat
@@janefairless7410 If she had some secateurs handy she could prune a few roses in that hat. There are multiple pictures of her wearing some very stylish hats.
The baby in the photo is older then what Archie should have been
The baby looks about two or three months old.
Old photo of Hs christening.
Than
My thoughts exactly. Would you hold a newborn like this?? Wouldn’t they be held laying in your arms at TWO days old!!!
@@margashcroft549 That was my first thought, a Royal baby but not Markles.
It would be a far bigger shock to me to be told that the photo hadn’t been tampered with.
Every single photo of theirs is manipulated his hair grows then disappears then grows again
A different child every pic, or the same really old ones. The hair colour goes from brown, red, to blonde for the boy. Hardly any pics of "lili", the same one of August in the blue suit.
@@trueblue6039 well it seems they are going to be at the Invictus meeting you can bet they were paid for that let’s see who they trot out for that
😂😂 Unlike Hairballs
Get the twins dad on the case. He is an expert!
I think he is planning on dissecting it. We all suggested it to the Twins. Fingers crossed.🤞
Yeah, expert 50 Yeats ago.😂
@@ralphowens8346 Sorry, Ralphie, he’s still called as an expert witness. And btw, please illuminate us with your qualifications. We’ll wait.
An expert of 50 years wee Ralphie lad.
Isn't it time for your nappie change, bath and bedtime with Snookie your teddy bear?
@@ralphowens8346🎶🎵Aww... sugar!🎵🎶😂😂🤡
The fact is NOBODY CARES about said child's christening......
The kids or the parents. I think we are all here to watch the train wreck that is The Sparry and Wench show
They never met the imaginary kids
That is definitely Not a newborn by any stretch!
Always thought it was a photoshopped picture. Princess Catherine would never have worn that colour to a Christening. The ladies usually wear white or cream, except M of course to Prince Louis’s because she wanted to stand out.
Agree...not a outfit Catherine would wear not her style
Markle stood out all right at Louis’s christening.
She looked like an olive with toothpick legs.
Just a tiny contrast to the pickle dress when the suggested colors were red,white,or blue.
@dross6624 Meghan loked Like Green💩 in Louis Christining..WHO was her Stylist?
@@mischa9587 .......she far TOO CONTROLLING to ever hire/pay anybody else to dress her - and it shows.
ONLY at the very beginning of their "relationship when she was just worming her way into the R.F. did she ever look suitably attired.
Exactly 💯
I challenge everyone - including mainstream media - to present a Sussex produced photo that WAS NOT photoshopped!
Exactly 💯
Meghan has said she would like another child,but she didn’t divulge who the mother would be.
BEST ONE EVER!!! 💯👍🏻
LoL 😅🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂
They received another paid award for only having two kids. 😂😂
And would the father be Harry........? There seem to be no end to the invisiwomb producing invisikids.
Lol 😂😂😂😂😂
Dead in the water the first time
Of course it was manipulated. Look at how big Catherine and William are.
Lady Jane, with her upbringing, would never wear that sort of hat to formal event.
Exactly.
Yes...definitely not an authentic original photograph, imo..
Check the reflection in the mirror! The Queen was not there and said she never met Archificial! So there is that! I would take the QE11 words over Me-Again! Also why are William and Kate floating and fuzzy?
There are other photos of QE II with Archie, it was Lily she said she had not met and there are no photos of her with Lily.
True, but the only photo I've seen with the late Queen and Archie together was the Christening photo.
*The Queen wasn't anywhere near close enough to actually SEE the baby*
@@margaretmetcalfe9380, the only supposed pic of the late Queen and Philip meeting Archie is definitely photoshopped and the baby is a doll.
The Queen was not at the christening,she had a prior engagement.
@@user-ro2vb8by7ualso that picture of the Queen and Philip was actually taken when they were admiring a new foal. They were not looking at Archie😡😡
No children
I've always thought this picture looks hacked together.
I always thought William and Catherine were added, they are so far away from the rest
The Pat Tillman Award, honoring AMERICAN veteran war hero Pat Tillman, who was killed in Afghanistan, should go to a deserving AMERICAN - not to BRITISH Prince Harry! Please sign the petition "Request ESPN to Rethink Awarding the Pat Tillman Award to BRITISH Prince Harry" Only 670 signatures needed to get to 68,000 signatures! The award should be given to a deserving AMERICAN veteran!
Make your voice heard! We can do this! There's strength in numbers! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
The baby is 2 days old is impossible!
There was no christening. There is no way the Queen and Catherine would ever wear those clothes. When the Sussex Squad was berating Catherine about her photo, I asked about these photos.
Many people have noticed the photo was manipulated. just the incorrect christening dress for many of those "guests", then onto the missing chair legs, and the out of scale people . .
The chair legs are not missing. Watch the video.
It's so blatantly photoshopped as to be ridiculous. Not only would Catherine be at least 7' tall, she is hovering on that chair! She is also wearing amazing shoes, with only one heel.. ... , Lady Jane is wearing a gardening hat here, but the funniest is that ' archie' has a FOOT for a hand! That bulge behind the fingers is a heel. The only other photoshopped Harkle photo is the very weird one of them with ' the children' [ a Christmas photo?] where MM has at least 7 toes.
In Megs own words...I AM SUCH A FRAUD...she proves it over and over...lol😅
The first time I saw this picture I thought it was photoshopped.
I find it hard to believe that Catherine would wear such unflattering ugly dress and hat.
If photo is real, I believe Princess Catherine purposely wear this outfit because when Prince Louis was christened, Meghan wore that olive outfit instead of the following the light colors the others wore 🇺🇸
@@user-ud6gu3oq4x Passive aggressive, I feel that Catherine is too adult to react that way
Agree ❤
If he was christened QE would have been there .....
Not necessarily-the Queen did not attend every great grandchild’s Christening. Her schedule sometimes conflicted-she was not at Louis’, for example.
@@r.bellbottom8964Amen! Can't tell these yanks anything mate.😂
@@ralphowens8346Um, I’m American so…but thanks for the shout out, I guess.
@@r.bellbottom8964 Present one excluded mate!!👍🤣
@@ralphowens8346we assume some of you are on the same education level as Just Sparry so 🎉
For me in this picture Catherine looks giant and too much big/tall in comparison to William and others
Exactly!! 👌
Agree ❤
Since Sidley Twins dad reviewed that picture with the "children" and pointed out all the photoshop fails the Harkles haven't put out pictures. Lol!😅😂🎉 Yay Sidley dad!❤
The Royal Family needs to come clean…. The End
Harry and Meghsn are the ones who need to come clean.....they created this shite.....they are Adults not giggly little teenagers...
They are complicit in this fraud, it is so clear.
When it was released my first impression was it was off in some way. Size, positions, scale seemed just wrong with everyone.
Justin Welby was at the General Synod that day, it is reported that nobody saw him leaving.That's because he didn't.
Always thought it was fake. Only because it looks it.
Princess Catherine, bless her heart. The poor woman grimaces in photos with Meghan.
This portrait of the family is giving off major tension. Meghan has that effect on everyone she meets.
Could Catherine Princess of Wales be sat any further from mega monster?
Princess Catherine would NEVER have dressed like that for a Christening
Thank You. Love from Ontario, Canada❤❤❤
I always felt this picture was fishy!
Why are the rest of the royal family going along with this nonsense?
I think that this has been mentioned a number of times. Everything they do is fake including them
If Catherine stood up she would tower over William!!
Sorry, you're forgetting perspective. Objects or living things closer to the camera or viewer appear larger than objects or living things further away from the camera or viewer. Even in short distances. William is behind and further away from the camera than Catherine, so she looks larger. Look at how Harry seems huge compared to his admittedly short mother in law, and the Queen looks larger than King Charles. Perspective is how the eye sees and judges distance.
Always knew that Photo of alleged Christian it was photoshopped, look at the size of Princess Catherine as well, also Queen Camilla as well as Prince William and the mirror. Not forget there was no way the Archbishop of Canterbury attended for the Ceremony he was a long way away at some other Church function he needed to be, he couldn’t possibly be in two places as the same time.
An aunt's hat looks like she's going gardening!
The Queen and Prince Philip didn't go to Archie's christening as they had another engagement on that day
????? 😅😅
Nor did the Archbishop of Canterbury who had another engagement in York at The General Synod.
There was no christening for the doll.
@@margashcroft549if the queen and prince and Archbishop what does that say this was fake everything about this lying scammer are lies and scams.
@@roffen969if the queen and prince and the Archbishop did not go what does that tell us. She's a lying scammer.
I noticed they weren't centred on the sofa.
My same thoughts too! Meghan always wants to be in the center of everything. That’s what I noticed 🇺🇸
Jesus, are you saying that photo wasn't photoshopped? Hazard didn't know how old his son is 2 days or 2 weeks. Their intention is to promote artificial is for real 🤷 Unfortunately, they were caught out lying for 6yrs and, even if they told the truth, I would not believe it. The boy who cried wolf.
Shortly after this someone said they'd seen Catherine arrive at the Palace that day, dressed in blue.
The date of Archie's christening was July 6 2019, but the date of the original photo of this occasion was May 8 2019???? Are Meghan and Harry able to time travel?
Hazbeen is such a slob.
Can’t believe he wore old shoes
Take a look at tge photo when the Queen and Prince Phillip with Doria staring down at so called baby Archie. Danja Zone said immediately the Queen and Prince Phillip was cut & pasted.
What happened to Danja Zone? She wasn't very old.
No way would the Queen be dressed in a cardigan for this type of photo, she had class and impeccable taste.
Someone posted years ago that they had found the babies image was one of Harry when he was a baby.
I have always questioned this photo! The only thing that looked real was Meghan sitting as far away from Catherine as possible 😂
The one thing I noticed right away was how Megsy was hanging onto Harry. She absolutely cannot leave him alone (at least in public)
Archie is more in focus than anyone else.
Harry and Megan's faces look as if they have been through a filter. They are both so smooth and shiny without a wrinkle or a spot. Also, Harry has hair.
A lot more hair than he actually had back then!!
Didn't the Spencers know something was totally off. They have been loudly quiet.
The first thing I noticed which I can’t take my eyes off, is the size of Catherine. She is HUGE and out of proportion to everyone else. I’m sure this photo has been manipulated. Regarding Camilla’s outfit - the decoration could easily have been “removed” using photoshop and other slight alterations made. I think it’s the same outfit.
Imo, this entire pic was photoshopped. I don't think this event ever took place. P.S. Coincidentally, I was watching Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" when this video popped up. I don't believe in "coincidences." Also, Hitchcock was a perfectionist and paid enormous attention to every single detail. He said that filming a movie was boring since he had already story boarded it prior. You, Jesus, have that same keen eye and perfectionism. 🧐🧐💜💜
I thought someone had pointed out that the actual clock in that room was much smaller than the one in the picture. I wonder what time was on that clock, if this allegation was true.
Zara has said no one in the RF ever met Archie Harrison/Harry's son - maybe she did not include the christening as a meeting
Yeah, she made Princess Catherine look like an amazon, I think she added the aunts.
Of course it's photo shopped other youtubers hv already debunked this as a fake. No one in the RF has ever met archie
The RF should demand an immediate’k’ notice on that photo
The way the figures are grouped always made me think that they maybe intended to crop out Charles, Camilla, William and Catherine at some stage in the future, and have just the parents and baby, backed by Doria and Diana’s two sisters!!
When this photo was originally released, there was a lot of chat (including your channel) about this photo being photoshopped.
There's no way I will ever believe this " christening pic" is authentic. The Bishop of Canterbury who was supposed to officiate the event was in another part of the country at the time of supposed "christening". Different child for the black and white "christening" photo as well.
The pic of you, without your glasses...
Wow. You look 20 years younger!
So Handsome!!!
I think Princess Catherine looks larger than life. Megain's body is much wider and thicker than Catherine's.
Why so took ozempic most likely
Lady Janes hat was a nod to the Yachtchess.
In catholic christening need to show original birth certificate how come they cannot show proof with the royals.
They are Church of England though, not Catholic.
Yes. That's answered that question.
Once a TRAITOR ALWAYS A TRAITOR!!!
This applies 100% to Harry & Me-again !!!!!!!
Williams arm is casting a shadow on his aunts arms
Yes, absolutely. No doubt in my mind.
This picture was picked apart as soon as it came out. The obvious was spotted immediately.
Why wasn't the Queen in this picture? She always was there during the christening of her grandchildren.
This photo doesn't make any sense to me.
❤️🙏❤️
This is her alleged great grandchild. QE2 hasn't attended all her great grand children's christenings, depending on her schedule.
@@mymai5859She wasn't at several christenings, only grandchildren, not great grandchildren!
Why no Queen Elizabeth 11? She was alive then.
I wonder, was there a dress color code for the ladies to wear. What would happen if Princess Catherine wore shocking pink dress instead of the pastel? Would it bother Meghan, since Meghan used to wear an outfit of a different color than the rest of the people in the picture to stand out or was it to be a rebel.
All the people beside and behind the couch were added later. You can clearly see...Harry wanted a picture with him megan and archie alone but that was not wjat the RF wanted so they were added so the pictire couldbe released to the public. This is not the Monarchy of Harry... 😂
Yes, of course. We all noticed, years ago.
Notice how the wife is sitting in the middle and hairball is squeezed in. She is such a self-important creature.
That photo was picked apart the day it was posted....totally photoshopped...badly too..
RUclips blocks comments when you try to point details.I counted few but can’t post it.Its not legit photo
Look at Williams head-it’s obvious.
I realise Catherine is in the front of the others, but she seems so much bigger than everyone else. I know she is tall, but her face is bigger than the others???? I think - if anything - she was photoshopped in.
A ROYAL photographer forgot to adjust his camera!
On ths picture Catherine and Camilla are giants, of course manipulated
I think William's smirk says it all 😂😂😂
The Archbishop of Canterbury was presiding at the General Synod in York that day. He cannot have christened Archificial.
Jesus, slightly above Prince Williams right ear there is what looks like a paper cutout in the photo. ???????