Do NOT put your finger in the Tesla Cybertruck Frunk
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 май 2024
- Tesla released an update that is supposed to make the Tesla Cybertruck frunk safer. After some testing, Tesla actually told me I did the test wrong. We learned that it has an algorithm that increases pressure over time. I put my arm, then hand, then finger. According to the algorithm it thinks I wanted the frunk closed. Perhaps a big bag was in the way. Using this information, that means it closed on my finger harder than my hand and way harder than my arm.
Наука
![Eminem - The Death of Slim Shady [Album Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X0HIrS6kUYI/mqdefault.jpg)
I thought the dumbest thing you could do with a cybertuck was to buy one... Thanks for proving me wrong.
😂😂😂😂😂
Brokeass
This sounds like a person making excuses for their partner in an abusive relationship
Lol yes, blink twice if you're not ok 🤪
@@Jasey357 one day there’s gonna be a support group for all the wronged Elon fanboys
That is exactly what Tesla fans sound like. 'It was my fault. I shouldn't have done what I did'. The willingness to submit to an 'authority' is proudly on display with these people.
@@dmwalker24 it’s so sad. These guys would die for Elon and he wouldn’t give them the time of day. Remember the definition of insanity?
Excuse me sir, but can you show me on this doll where the cyber truck hurt you?
It should start driving by itself after it traps your finger. Very cool.
Try to put your finger while someone else is closing the trunk manually.. Very cool!
Preferably off a cliff.
@@RicardoPereira-pk3py lol the cope from musk stans goes from 0 to "completely detached from reality" every time, just like this guy's finger if he had left it in there
Ha!
@@iplaydodgeball
BS. He worked against the algorithm.
The first banana was the proof the system worked.
After every failed attempt it increases the closing force until it is fully closed.
Then the force algorithm resets itself again to delicate.
What’s not to like about that engineering genius?
He just fooled himself by doing what he was doing.
Where is Teslas mistake in it?
Such a lead engineer thing to say lmao. “You’re putting your finger in the frunk wrong” no dummy, you over engineered a trunk closing. It shouldn’t close with something in the way.
Word
Exactly. No other manufacturer is having to defend their safety feature because of "user error"
I mostly agree, but i could see myself with that frunk packed with stuff to where it barely shuts. I'd bet the intent for it to go down harder/be less sensitive was for that kinda situation.
That's what happens when Elon fires everyone who isn't a type A narcissist.
You want the world to baby proof everything??? It’s called life, try living in it using your own logic
i love that the engineer told you that there is "a correct way" to get your finger cut by a tesla
It chopped a finger sized carrot and then he put his finger in?
Intrusive thoughts
Completely insane.
Expected nothing more from a cybertruck owner
he'd better try his 21 first finger )) darwin award.
@@alexk6745 LOL
The fact that his most basic, primal survival instincts are the ONLY thing stopping him from doing it again. Hes willing to sacrifice his hand for this company. His body just physically won't let him. Insanity...
That was honestly comedy gold. He physically could not force his body to do that. His lizard brain was like not today.
I like how you guys’ minds tick
Tesla cult
Can't stop laughing at this post...
Call of the Void
"you didn't test our safety mechanism right, try doing it like this and you're fine!"
dude must not have kids.
If someone has to say "you tested it wrong", then the problem is not with the tester, it's with the product.
You'll try 3 times to close it on your child's hand?
@@andrasbiro3007 Well, imagine the situation: You tried closing it on luggage twice and when you try it the third time, unfortunately a child put its hand at a position, at which the front trunk (I refuse to use the other silly word) closes on its hand. These things happen. Murphys Law was invented to describe exactly that: If anything can go wrong, it will. And as an engineer you have to make sure that you think of ways of avoiding anything going wrong. Tesla fucked up here.
@@andrasbiro3007 siblings? without a doubt.
@@richardauer3131
Extremely unlikely situation. You are essentially just making it up to justify your emotional response.
Imagine this situation : It's a manually operated trunk, like 99% of cars have, and you slam it down without looking around properly, right onto someone's hand.
I know someone who had his skull cracked in such an accident.
Should've used your junk instead and put the whole kit in there so you won't pass your genes.
😅🤣😂😂🤣😅
@@sullivan912 Maybe he already did but decided against uploading that video 😂
😂😂
Remind me of someone putting their d in smarties tube.
It would have slipped out a lot easier than that finger. 😂
The more it tries the harder it gets? Wow Tesla calm down
Imagine if people tried this while flirting . "The more you deny me the harder I'm going to try!". Eventually it turns to sexual harassment
It assumes that you want to close it despite the resistance. Pretty logical, that's what you do manually too, if it doesn't close, you try harder.
@@andrasbiro3007might also be a kid playing with the mechanism. Makes absolutely no sense to not differentiate humans at least.
@@TBombahhone mans sexual harrassment is another mans rizz
@@andrasbiro3007copium ass comment
An algorithm that increases pressure over time when it should be an algorithm that detects an obstacle and reverses the close, and they claim he 'did the test wrong'? This is incredible. Good work everyone.
Hey shut up, Tesla died for your sins and posted about it on X, be grateful that Elon Musk stole such a shitty idea.
normal people when trying to close a car door: it didn't close, let's see if something's stuck in it, remove it, and gently try again...
weird people: it didn't close, I should try again with more force... and after that I'll see also why my toddler is screaming over the top of his lungs, jeez...
"It increases pressure every single time you try". I am glad the garage door openners don't work that way.
I assure you elevators would be way worse. (I doubt garage door could make you roleplay bacteria reproduction but elevators probably could (didn't do the math).
Goes to show you the intelligence of the person buying this thing,or is it the lack of intelligence.
Its technology, it shuts itself like a van side door there needs to be safety just incase. Do you think its a better idea to go back to the days of kids getting hurt and parents saying just walk it off? Why do the same type of people want to go back to the wild west? We missed that period, just live in this day and this technology
@@davidvickers8425 hey, good point, you got me with that one. Well done.
@@georgeburdine5660 The point missing is - other manufacturers have safer "self closing" mechanisms. I think this guy on the video made another vid comparing many car brands.
If he can afford to drop $100K on a vehicle he probably is pretty intelligent.
You are proof that the movie Idiodracy has become reality
How? He put his arm in and could feel it didn't push too hard. So he didn't expect it to push harder when he did his finger. Perfectly understandable, and kinda unsafe like he says
Okay Musk Fanboy, calm down. This was simple testing of safety. I hope you aren't ever involved in any QA/Safety testing if you think this is of idiocy.
😂😂😂 this is equivalent to "Ow my Balls"
@@Anthony_MaillyIf you think customers are the people supposed to do QA testing you are the dumbo here.
@@Anthony_MaillyBro just watched it break a carrot in half and decided to put his finger in it. If that isn’t the definition of being an idiot I don’t know what is. There are other ways to test safety without putting yourself at risk.
"The carrot didn't stop it. Let me try my finger." 💀
Any other company : “That’s dangerous, we need to fix that”.
Tesla : “Let’s have it close with more force”.
Say what you like about German engineering. Too hard to work on. Not very intuitive. The German solution would be, "If it doesn't close, there's some kind of obstruction. We're not forcing it closed, because you want to act dumb". I took a look and Mercedes uses a system that will stop, and reverse if anything is detected from fully opened to within 8mm of the trunk being closed.
Surely if the frunk encounters resistance then it means something is in the way and should be moved. Why would any engineer think the solution should be that instead of waiting for the obstruction to be removed that the frunk should just close harder and harder?
You can also enable "hardcore slam" mode if you need to use It for chopping wood or emergency amputations.
What is really surprising is that there exists technology that can keep a spinning wood saw blade from nicking a finger, and it would surely work on a situation like this much better than what they are doing. It could even choose to squash a bag a little and be able to tell the difference between a bag and a finger. Tesla is just being cheap... ruclips.net/video/CUjat1JA_rw/видео.html&ab_channel=MarkWalters
That would require competent people who actually care the tiniest bit about safety.
That's what you do manually too. Imagine a normal use, not vegetable torturing. What could cause resistance that doesn't go away after the first try? Most likely the luggage in the trunk that's just a bit too big. And the owner seem to be really wanting that frunk to close, since he pushed the button repeatedly without removing the obstacle. So the logical thing to do is to try harder.
@@tomsteele937 i agree tesla's fucking it up horribly but i dont think you can run an electric current through the car the same way you could through a saw blade.
Imagine being such a Tesla fanboy that you risk your own health for the company.
It lopped off the carrot so you just said ok let's to body parts now...
imagine being the ER doctor and you're just ready to grab some lunch and then that guy shows up while dragging his cybertruck along...
That was honestly the most poorly thought-out and least safe way of attempting to test something like that.
I agree it was ill conceived but there are way worse ways to show this crappy mechanism.
I want him so show us those. Very cool 😉👌
“Florida Man gets eaten by Cybertruck”
Aahhh, the ol' "You're using it wrong" excuse. Reminds me of when iPhones had shit reception and Apple blamed it on the way EVERYONE held the phones.
Yea, I remember that . Classic gaslighting.
yes, I always put my finger under a closing hood. very important feature.
And there were Apple fanbois who were stupid enough to believe them at the time.
"Without further ado..." proceeds to ado further...twice
Yeah man I thought I was the only one irrationally angry over it
Elon fans doing crazy mental gymnastics these days.
Please keep doing the finger test on different cars. I absolutely loved watching this, very informative!
😁😁
I wish that he'd keep doing the "Cyber Truck" it obviously needs more testing with different body parts.
Put your 🐓in it.
Well, considering he named his car Lorena, I'd not try it myself....
"Without further ado..." There was further ado.
Worthy candidate for darwin award 2024.
Darwin awards aren't given to just stupid people, they're for stupid people that remove themselves from the gene pool. Unless in the next video he tries closing the trunk on his neck or his balls, he wouldn't qualify
“If it doesn’t close the first try, we programmed it to close harder.”
That’s Tesla engineering? That’s an unimaginably dumb idea.
By the fourth try it's powerful enough to crush a cinder block
It's a perfectly logical idea. You told it to close repeatedly, so it just tries to comply. The assumption is that if someone's finger is in the way, they'll remove it after the first attempt, so any remaining resistance must come from the luggage.
@@andrasbiro3007dumbest assumption ever. Swear they don't do actual engineering, just random pipe dreams. It could be anything in the way, if you want to close it, like everything else, move the obstruction, don't crush it, wtf
@@andrasbiro3007 there is nothing logical about crushing your luggage harder each time it fails to close. Read back what you wrote to yourself.
The logical thing to do would be to have an indicator for trunk obstruction, not repeatedly attempt to crush your belongings.
@@c-spam9581 As someone who recently went on vacation, I can understand the logic. The bulk of the luggage is just clothes that can be squished without harm, and it is unlikely that anybody would put something delicate in there in a way that it could be crushed. That being said unlikely is not impossible, and well they just failed to consider people demonstrating the feature.
I think the results are inconclusive. Do you think it would be clearer if you used your neck instead of your finger?
Or maybe the guy who volunteered his child as a crash test dummy thinks the kid has a few too many fingers
At least he wouldn't be losing a critical part of his body...
Devs: you crushed your finger wrong. An algorithm to crush your finger eventually. Pure genius lol
Imagine breaking your fingers and wasting 100k dollars for a trash compactor on wheels then still simp for Tesla. Congratulations on the Darwin Award of 2024 buddy, you earned it.
😁 Now I don't have to say it.
“We’re just gonna have to trust the bananas”
after seeing all that food wasted I was kind of rooting: go Tesla, bite it off... but ok... I'm guessing if the finger would be clear off Elon would pay him handsomely to shut up about it?
Now slam a door closed on it. You’re not trying unless you have 9 fingers left.
You'd have to be a fool to buy this "truck" in the first place, but sticking your finger in to actually test it is next level.
What’s with the hate on teslas and the cyber truck
He did lose the little compassion I felt for him when I saw him wasting all that good food... I was going: come on Tesla!
Losing fingers to simp for elon is a look 🤡
Finding Tesla videos to btch and moan about a company you hate is also a look 🤡
HAHAHA the Elon hater has a video of them at a pro refugee protest... Can't make this stuff off. TheCommies are always the ones crying about Musk.
i think there might be a design flaw on the cybertruck, but i just cant put a finger on it
Shouldn't the algorithm work the other way around?
The current algorithm is a safety hazard.
It doesn't even need a "complex" algorithm like this. If something's in the way, don't close. Simple.
Holy crap you are lucky. It looked like the end of days for your finger.
Am I the only one who thinks testing this with his actual finger was completely insane.
Car does what it's supposed to = Tesla owner impressed.
You know what doesn't need an algorithm and is not razor sharp? The trunk door of my 2011 outlander sport. Never had this issue
Finger test starts at 1:56
It looks like the Cybertruck comes with a Lorena Bobbitt option at no additional cost.
Honest to god that is funny stuff. Almost as funny as a cyberpunk buyer.😂
That's such a tesla response: you accidentally left your finger in the way of the trunk wrong.
They calibrated the software to not cut a banana, but it still cuts a finger.
Putting your finger in a closing door, brilliant! Your Mama teach you anything?
Jackass: Cybertruck edition.
I remember the SAW-movies... this would definitely be the preferred vehicle of that 'jigsaw' guy, although knowing him, he'd probably put a Diesel engine in it before anything else...
Engineer: If you stupid enough to do it 3 times, natural selection mode will be activated.
Anyone who says frunk unironically doesn't deserve respect
Don eladio
An idiot would know that if it can chop off the top of a carrot, it can chop off your finger 😂
Sometimes, the most obvious results must still be tested.
the weird part of the video is that the dude looks very sober... there's a bunch of 'Fist of Zen' inspired drunks going to wanna play a game with this device...
RUclipsrs winning the Darwin Award hahaha
The Tesla algorithm is basically "if at first you dont succeed cutting of the finger, try, try again, only harder each time".
"letting the intrusive thoughts win" bro does not know what an intrusive thought is
The way he said the last, “I CANNOT” after the final attempt to put his finger in the frunk again lmaooo 🤣🤣😂😂😂😭😭😭😭
So in other words, the trunk closes like a 13-year-old kid trying to close a door that won't shut. First it does it gently, and then it slowly gets more pissed off until it just smashes whatever the fuck is in the way. Why not just have it stay open if something is in the way, period? 🤣
exactly, and after that he'll look why his 5 year old sister is screaming so annoyingly... :)
"i personally feel think the algorithim should favor safety over a bag getting in the way, but thats just me"
'man who got finger stuck in frunk' 2024
imagine having to drag that entire vehicle to the ER so they can have it removed... we're gonna have to amputate... NOOH, I was talking to the car...
Checking if fire is hot by holding a hand into it, evolved.
In his next video he will test table saws and garbage disposal units!
dude maybe update your brain as well
sadly cant update the hardware...
Too late purchased an EV, and a "Cyber Truck" too (snort 🤪)
Should never have an engineer working on safety features if they believe user error is anything more than design failure.
Scoop: "I bought a Cybertruck" demoted to second most stupid thing you can say.
That’s one way to learn what you shouldn’t do. 😂
This is what humanity come to. We spend our time watching videos telling us to not stick our fingers in closing car doors. Wow. What a revelation.
Electric cars are good at pointing out idiots and those that are lazy.
I love how you pulled your finger off at the last. SUPER FUNNY. I needed a good laugh today. Thank you. BtW even if I had the money for a cybertruck, no way me.
Never heard of a stupider algorithm
This is why they demo the SawStop with hot dogs.
There should never be a "get harder next time"
The resistance decreasing has gotta be the dumbest design I’ve ever heard of. “The first
Time it’ll chop your finger off. But the second and third time it’ll leave the rest of them intact.
That's what happens when engineers are forced to overengineer things for "convenience". Now it's hard for the algorithm to determine whether the resistance is due to something like a finger or due to some bags in the compartment. Smart is not always better than old school.
your nerves in your finger probably got destroyed
At least he didn't put his personal 'banana' in there.
Everyone is putting in their two cents about how the algorithm should work, and I'm sitting here wondering how we got so lazy that the trunk needs to close itself in the first place... 🤔
Dude, you're freaking nuts. You could have lost your finger, and for what?
To your last point... There are times when people with regular cars do slam it with force to make bags fit. Being how the Tesla is, I can see how it would be annoying to not fit things in their so I don't blame them for what they're doing. By the 3rd close, obviously you're trying to force something. Although I would suggest a timer. Say after the 2nd failed close, if more than 10-20sec go by without retrying to close, it should reset in case a finger does end up in the pinch zone.
If it fails to chop off a body part entirely, the algorithm will keep trying harder and harder until it succeeds. It's a feature.
I wonder if they're still making movies in that weird horror genre of the SAW-movies... they could make a dedicated episode with a bit of Christine (Stephen King) added...
@@marcdc6809 Brilliant. Name your cybertruck: Christine. (Stephen king) It only chops up people it doesn't like. Don't insult my truck or it'll come after you. (Assuming self driving works well enough to come after you)
Sounds like the only reason this guy still has his finger is because he got lucky and reset the sensor
next guy tests if buzz saw will stop on the nth time, but the nth time is done with his finger
whoever put those lines in the code should be flogged. Keep it simple, don't close if there's resistance, simple, less code complexity, and less to maintain. Garage doors don't keep trying harder, and neither do elevator doors. There is ONE person responsible for putting that atrocious logic in, that person should be named and made public
The truck really said "uck around and you'll find out"
Bad algorithm. Maybe it can't close because some item you don't want to destroy is not in it right and we all know forcing it is never a good idea.
So Tesla just says they did "software magic" instead of telling people how their own safety features work?
I appreciate your experiment and the Tesla engineer’s feedback. How else we gonna know?!
An algorithm for your frunk closing has got to be one of the stupidest things ever designed.... No if something is in the way either move it out of the way or manually push it down, do not add more pressure based on an algorithm unless you like being sued.
The fact that people are condoning these tests really boggles my mind. All these people are doing. Is just proving how unsafe this Thing is
And the darwin award goes to.....
I once worked for a company that built adjutable work benches. Once there was a manufacturing error causing a gap and someone put his finger there and pushed down on the hand control. I asked if they could not send a diploma for idiocy to the guy, but my employer declined.
Bros definitely Undercover
Screamed in lower case when the trunk smooshed that finger.
I don’t own a cybertruck, and I probably won’t ever own one, but your sacrifice has earned you a like, if you had left the finger the 2nd time you would’ve gotten a sub.
this is why there’s caution labels on everything
It needs to be tested as child-safe. Know where I'm going here?
It's been many years since I've seen your content man. Seeing you on reddit was a blast from the past! 2016 is getting to be a long time ago!
How does someone this dense get enough money to buy one of these monstrosities?
For everyone wondering, his finger grew back and recorded and posted this video. Trust me, I’m a doctor.
That frunk almost took his finger 😂.
Looking at this guys eyes and expression... I think he may be mental. Very Cool.
1st attack apparently Cyberfridge takes a bite to a human 😂😂😂😂
There is no way they actually made an algorithm to close the frunk harder each time..... If people wanna close the frunk despite resistance, they can press down on it. They tried to solve a problem no one had, like ever