There's no poll this time, because poll cards are discontinued after June 10, 2020. EDIT: Surprisingly, the poll cards are still available, at least for a short time, so I decided to put a poll on this video
The COD campaign was pretty good though compared to the battlefields feminist 14 y.o. Norwegian that survived impossible things and is a total dishonor to the British commandos which in battlefields story died
COD WW2 has some of the worst weapon sounds I've heard. The guns all sound like staplers, and the reload sounds make the guns seem like they're made out of tinfoil and plastic.
Then again the game wasn’t focused on realism more than arcade styled gameplays honestly. Although they clearly stated that the game was “realistic” on behalf of the graphics itself and not primarily the actual game mechanics.
@@bcw1nc865 How much have battlefield mechanics changed at all? Genuinely curious, not much difference in gameplay between the games from what I've played.
@@Bimgus9 It's literally shooting at half speed. The IRL fire rate is 1100+ so it'll look like BF's display than the lethargic MG34 in disguise that we get in COD's
If anyone says that BFV’s Thompson doesn’t look right, I just want to say that they are different Thompsons. CoD WWII has the American M1A1, and BFV has the British “Chicago Typewriter.” Edit: The Chicago typewriter was also American, but it was used by the British in WWII
Thompsons are all American made by Auto Ordenance in the US, the _Chicago Typewriter_ is not British, it's an early M1928 Military model (Navy Issue I believe) which was derived from then 1921 Police issue gun.
Excellent point and my guess is that the real life Battlefield British Thompson submachine gun what's the ones used in El Alamein 1942 Egypt in addition to the Sherman tank first used there
While the m1 Thompson and the 1928 models have differences, both externally and internally, in function they are the same. The difference is simplification. The m1 variant did away with the blishlock, the adjustable rear sights, the more complex vertical front grip and the ability to accept drum magazines. Otherwise, basically the same recoil impulse, same ammunition, almost the same handling, etc.
One thing BFV got right that 99% of WW2 games I've seen get wrong is the way the character holds the Sten gun. Holding it by the magazine was actually not recommended because doing so would put pressure on the magazine catches which could be bent out of shape and lead to the magazine failing to feed properly. This was especially concerning given the weapon's already subpar reliability.
Bf1: (swole doge) we provide a battle simulation of what war would have been like in ww1. BfV:(crying cheems) plz sjws, like our game, there is a woman in the trailer
Tadgh O'Connor It’s more like Swole BF1 doge: I thought millions about the First World War and while I may not be the most accurate, I’m still immersive Crying BFV cheem: The technology isn’t there for double XP
Tadgh O'Connor BF1 wasn’t very accurate (I’m not saying it’s bad, it’s a remarkable and amazing game). Verdun is a bit more accurate but it still doesn’t capture the fear and boredom of the trenches
Battlefield: I'm going to reload my scope gun the only way I can by reloading single rounds Cod: I'm going to reload my bolt gun the by shoving a striper clip into it at an impossible angle
The maps on release weren’t very good except for two, but the maps added after release were 100% beautifully done had the atmosphere the release maps were missing
4:30 the M3 Grease Gun fires from an open bolt. If you listen carefully, the sound for the cocking animation includes a bolt being cycled forward, something that you can't hear on an open bolt gun.
the charging handle would still make an audible noise when it moves back forward though. that is the first model of the grease gun, that had a separate charging handle.
@@mondaymotivator_ not really. it's a giant handle that's basically like the handle on a wind up toy. it would make sense for it to make that much noise.
If only it had kept the same system as bf1 but in ww2 , it would have been amazing in my opinion but no, innovation was their downfall. Also the fucking Battle Royale that failed completely
@@darkzero7969 95% of people, nice "statistics" you got there. i gueess i was wrong. lma still the worst in the modern battlefields. even hardline was better.
@@potatopatch8943 Well, the mid-reload can be accepted, as the bolt wouldn't slam forward on it's own sometimes due to mud, or bad maintenance. Yet still, they could've done different animations like BFV did, so nobody would complain about it
A lot of CoD WW2’s weapons sound like the devs were fiddling with the same tin can over and over again. The weapons in CoD WW2 always sounded weak to me
The reload animations are good, but the reload sounds are unsatisfying and samey. Only weapon that had different sounds and actually sounded good when reloading was the FG42.
@@mashedpotatoesgaming454 I'm pretty sure that BO3 changed it with AK reload, BO4 just reused BO3's AK reload, Ghosts also had different AK reload as well as Advanced Warfare or Infinite Warfare and also, besides MW19, Cold War also had new AK reload that practically looked almost identical to MW19 but it was different animation actually and it also looked worse technically, less realistic and natural. Edit: MWII 22 also has new reload for AK that's entirely different to MW19's one.
Yeah, BFV is horrifically inaccurate on so many things in general but at least the weapons are well animated and the animator/s clearly put effort in to it, meanwhile COD WW2 at least feels like WW2 buts it’s guns are so awful in terms of sound and how they function (like their fire rate and their reload animations) and it just feels like the animators for this game were just lazy or it was just rushed
BFV nails weapon sounds, reloads, magazine capacities, extended magazine compatibilities, and to some extent, fire rates, than COD WW2. Like how the Karabin in BFV is portrayed as a non detachable 10 rounder, which is legit, but in COD it was detachable. It's also how funny how COD's Thompson is called an M1928 when it's actually an M1A1, whereas BF actually used an M1928A1 Thompson with the correct drum capability.
It's a 50/50 honestly. Some fire-rates in Battlefield are very wrong too. The BAR fires insanely fast, like twice as fast as it could. The Type 2A also fires twice as fast as it did in real-life. It only fired at ~650 RPM, which the Call of Duty one is much closer to that. The rocket launcher reloads are wrong in both, forgetting to connect the rocket to the electric connector on the launcher. The mag size of the Type 97 LMG is also wrong in V. Some textures also look better and more like war-era stamped metal in Call of Duty, like the Volksturmgewehr. I think the wood also looks better on most rifles in Call of Duty. Some of the weapon models in Battlefield V like the M1928A1 and FG42 are also comically oversized. I've never seen a Thompson so fat and wide as Battlefield V portays it. Even if it's an M1A1, the Thompson in Call of Duty looks so much better and more like the real thing. You also don't need to pull the bolt back a Thompson. The bolt automatically goes back into place when you pull the trigger, which only Call of Duty shows correctly. I've also never seen an FG42 THAT big like in Battlefield V. It's almost as big as an MG42, it's like a 12 year-old child is holding it. The FG42 is pretty compact since it's a Battle rifle. The bolt on the StG 44 is also frightingly small compared to the real thing, and the M1A1 and M2 carbines are post-war models from the 1950s. Battlefield V also messes up really bad by having the Panzerfaust being held on the shoulder, which makes operating the weapon literally impossible, since it fires in an arc like the PIAT. You're supposed to hold in under your shoulder like a rifle. While Call of Duty calls an M1A1 a M1928, Battlefield makes the same mistake by calling the Type 1 in-game the Type 2A. The Type 2 in Call of Duty is an _actual_ Type 2. Battlefield messes up plenty of weapon names too. It seems that a lot that Call of Duty got wrong Battlefield got wrong too.
Bf5:dead game with forgotten battle Royale and feminism Cod ww2:low budget gun sounds And graphic they spend money only in loot boxes and zombie mode Result:I play zombie mod of cod and Bf5 with bots Edit:black ops 4 is also an dead game
Operator 23 IMO it’s campaign was pretty decent . The multiplayer was pretty bad fo r the first half of the games cycle but it improved big time after Michael Condry left .
Graphics aside. I think WW2 has Better Reload Animations while Battlefield has the Best Sound design. ....even though that's always been that way since the old COD vs BF games so. Until the New MW finally changed the Sound Design which is now on par with BF games.
Well at least COD WW2's campaign still feels like ww2, BFV's campaign feels like a 12 year old SJW's interpretation of WW2, with the exception of the Last tiger. Don't get me wrong they're both mediocre at best but COD is just a bit better. I'm not a COD fanboy but I gotta give credit where it's due.
@@smarrkidd5538 Idiot, read my comment again, I said that both games are bad. Maybe work on your reading comprehension, so you don't make yourself look stupid and pathetic, 'kay, BFV fanboy?
It's not a matter of being experts, it's just common sense. I mean, the MG42 is one of the fastest firing machinegun of WW2, everybody knows that. Yet for some reason COD did, well, that thing.
When you're wearing headphones or listening in speakers, COD WWII gun sounds generate more bass than Battlefield V, but COD WWII lacks echo and crisp sound making it kinda unsatisfying
I like how that for all their accuracy in reload animations, BF still gets the M1 Garand wrong, by ejecting the bullets mid clip like that. Yes, the catch release on the side allows you to release the clip, but at the speed he reloads, that's clearly not what he's doing. He just pulls the rod all the way to the rear and the clip flies out.
It needs to pull all the way back to lock it open tho. One thing BF did got wrong is reloading when there's 1 round left, in game the round is still contained in the clip, but irl it would be ejected first, then the empty clip would fly out.
I like realism just as much as the other guy, but this is bullshit nitpicking. Just as the one with the "soldiers were trained to operate handguns single handedly in WW2". I know that was the standard procedure, but the way it is represented doesn't make it non plausible.
Both games have good animations, though BF5 has more good ones than WW2. Where BF5 really wins is sound design. All the reload sounds in WW2 are like the same two tin cans being banged into each other.
That detachable mag for the Arisaka and Karibin hurts me along with cod's insistence on loading rifles with stripper clips when there isn't room. Oh I fired 3 rounds from my 10 round capacity Lee Enfield let's load a 5 round stripper clip. That always bugs me.
I’m not sure but I thinks it’s because the shooter can rest his elbow on his knee when crouching and shooting. There might be some other reason that I’m missing though.
Cod WW2 has gotta be one of the worst AAA games ever made in terms of expectations and capability from the studio vs. the final project. The animations, guns, recoil, sounds, models, everything was just so shit.
@@91tears94 are ya stupid? I'm saing that it's realistic enough for a cod what do you not understand?! You know what I'm not gonna argue with an idiot on internet......have good day
Battlefield had always awesome sounds. COD gun sounds were always terrible but in COD WW2 those guns didn't even sound like guns no recoil or anything. And that sound of MP40 in COD is terrible. I never heard a terrible sound like this before.
I do prefer BFV's weapons since they do give a more natural firing sound and reloads fit the weapons perfectly. COD WW2 is just someone playing with metal pipes and bolts. But both kinda lack in loud banging when firing as it is like as if the players had noise filter headsets.
The Fun Fact Guy The EMP also has extended mags and the ZK383 has that weird lens sight also. It’s because they’re dlc weapons locked behind supply drops, so Tigerfield is probably using that random weapon perk to get them and so they have randomised attachments.
Entiny millions of people play both games (maybe not millions on cod) there not dead do you consider them this cause neither have gotten an update as of late or cause you don’t like them so no one does why do you think this
In Battlefield's defense Battlefield V still has a lot of full servers running on PS4 Japanese and Singaporean servers in every large mode (except Grand Ops) and TDM
Although BFV floored CoD with this one I do appreciate CoD WW2 for having different animations for all of the guns. They didn't reuse as much as the others.
You have to give credit to both games that tried they're best to make it "accurate". Either way, both games have their own strengths and weaknesses, and even though Battlefield V's weapons are superior, I prefer Cod WW2.
Alright if you guys think the Thompson reload from COD WW2 is wrong it's a yes and no, yes it is an Open bolt weapon but people complain about not pulling the bolt after switching to a fresh full magazine and people defend it for being an open bolt but you have to have the most powerful awareness and memory to memorize how many shots you fired in real combat while in full automatic and other gunshots all around you so yeah in conclusion: You gotta have the most powerful awareness to know your magazine is empty and the bolt hasn't been closed yet otherwise it'll be impossible to notice it while you're in real combat and I think they've done this because for balancing reasons and I can see that but the rate of fire of the MG42 is just pure disgusting they should've lowered the damage and keep its 1200-1500 RPM in place
@@67midnightmoon What part of Battlefield 5 is realistic?? The prologue where they have a Tiger Tank in the WRONG TIME PERIOD?? The part where they have a Sten Gun in the WRONG TIME PERIOD? The fact that the British Army recruits a theif in spec ops mission? What part is realistic???
After codmw19, I thought we were getting a cod comeback. Then warzone came and it was just kinda there... The guns and sounds were enough realistic for a cod game, but the movement just reminds me about that black ops nightmare. If only the movement and animations were slowed down and cod will feel like a semi-semi milsim game.
There's no poll this time, because poll cards are discontinued after June 10, 2020.
EDIT: Surprisingly, the poll cards are still available, at least for a short time, so I decided to put a poll on this video
wtf
Why thats such bs
Rip
why
:sob:
One thing they have in common is that they were both failed WW2 games
Bf5 did really good with pacifix tho
@@67midnightmoon For like 1 month, before they fuck it up again
True
The COD campaign was pretty good though compared to the battlefields feminist 14 y.o. Norwegian that survived impossible things and is a total dishonor to the British commandos which in battlefields story died
WW2 was NOT a failure lmao
COD WW2 has some of the worst weapon sounds I've heard. The guns all sound like staplers, and the reload sounds make the guns seem like they're made out of tinfoil and plastic.
I agree. It should take note from post scripum's sound design
Some of the damage is like that too
I know, it’s probably the worst gun sounds I’ve ever heard in any other game
Sounds are great, the mixing kills them
@@kaistzar2831 that is not at all what a gun sounds like bro
Oh my popcorn is ready. It's time to dive into a Warzone known as Comment section.
Gotta say, this "warzone" is somewhat entertaining...
@@irfoxe Best way to find if it's good game or not. Just bought and play the damn thing..
Imma grab my flamethrower to roast people
@Natalie Wayne Hell yes.
You should be awarded the noble piece prize just for the username
Devs: So how much recoil do u guys want?
Activision: No
Then again the game wasn’t focused on realism more than arcade styled gameplays honestly. Although they clearly stated that the game was “realistic” on behalf of the graphics itself and not primarily the actual game mechanics.
@@Okwardi maybe I would care if the game mechanics changed idk once? After like 5 years?
@@bcw1nc865 How much have battlefield mechanics changed at all? Genuinely curious, not much difference in gameplay between the games from what I've played.
@@bcw1nc865 Modern Warfare has changed the gameplay drastically
「Vythal」 BF4 is hella different than BF1 and V in terms of gameplay imo
The MG42 firerate from cod ww2 is unacceptable
@@Bimgus9 **way tooo slow.
@@Bimgus9 It's literally shooting at half speed. The IRL fire rate is 1100+ so it'll look like BF's display than the lethargic MG34 in disguise that we get in COD's
Icyy can’t tell if this a joke/troll
@ the fire rate of the MG42 is just total ass have you seen the real firerate of an irl MG42
@@Bimgus9 yes way way way to slow the irl MG42 fire rate is jacked as hell
If anyone says that BFV’s Thompson doesn’t look right, I just want to say that they are different Thompsons. CoD WWII has the American M1A1, and BFV has the British “Chicago Typewriter.”
Edit: The Chicago typewriter was also American, but it was used by the British in WWII
Thompsons are all American made by Auto Ordenance in the US, the _Chicago Typewriter_ is not British, it's an early M1928 Military model (Navy Issue I believe) which was derived from then 1921 Police issue gun.
Excellent point and my guess is that the real life Battlefield British Thompson submachine gun what's the ones used in El Alamein 1942 Egypt in addition to the Sherman tank first used there
@@EpicThe112
The British purchased both M1A1s and M1928s, they are fundamentally the same, the US gave the British whatever Thompson they had.
While the m1 Thompson and the 1928 models have differences, both externally and internally, in function they are the same.
The difference is simplification. The m1 variant did away with the blishlock, the adjustable rear sights, the more complex vertical front grip and the ability to accept drum magazines.
Otherwise, basically the same recoil impulse, same ammunition, almost the same handling, etc.
That makes more sense, thanks fo giving me closure it just looked too wide...
One thing BFV got right that 99% of WW2 games I've seen get wrong is the way the character holds the Sten gun. Holding it by the magazine was actually not recommended because doing so would put pressure on the magazine catches which could be bent out of shape and lead to the magazine failing to feed properly. This was especially concerning given the weapon's already subpar reliability.
If you should hold a gun at the mag then it's not a reliable gun in the first place I agree
In all fairness there are soldiers holding it by the magazine due to negligence even though it was not recommended.
Check out day of infamy, Its a really high quality and accurate ww2 shooter. I really enjoy it just for the feeling that firing guns give me!
Battlefield is really good at small details like that
Heaps of soldiers held their stem guns that way
I do not disliked these two games.
I'm just disappointed to the Devs who can't keep their heads out their asses.
Yup for both companies sadly
Same
Bf1: (swole doge) we provide a battle simulation of what war would have been like in ww1.
BfV:(crying cheems) plz sjws, like our game, there is a woman in the trailer
Tadgh O'Connor It’s more like
Swole BF1 doge: I thought millions about the First World War and while I may not be the most accurate, I’m still immersive
Crying BFV cheem: The technology isn’t there for double XP
Tadgh O'Connor BF1 wasn’t very accurate (I’m not saying it’s bad, it’s a remarkable and amazing game). Verdun is a bit more accurate but it still doesn’t capture the fear and boredom of the trenches
Battlefield 5 : Woah that's the sound.
COD WW2 : Are the weapons suppressed
Bruh FOR ME the sound of the 1911 in bfv is shit
how
@@cnumian_1244 I'm sorry you're right . But I that 1911 sounds good
I don't know
ok
*List of exact minutes*
Pistols
0:03 - M1911 (Battlefield 5 2020)
0:15 - 1911 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
0:27 - P08 (Battlefield 5 2020)
0:41 - P-08 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
0:54 - P38 (Battlefield 5 2020)
1:09 - 9mm Sap (Call of Duty WW2)
-
1:21 - Trench Carbine (Battlefield 5 2020)
1:47 - Machine Pistol (Call of Duty WW2)
Shotguns
1:59 - M1897 (Battlefield 5 2020)
2:17 - Combat Shotgun (Call of Duty WW2)
-
2:41 - M30 Drilling (Battlefield 5 2020)
3:10 - M30 Drilling (Call of Duty WW2)
SMGs
3:32 - MP40 (Battlefield 5 2020)
3:50 - MP40 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
4:06 - M3 Grease Gun (Battlefield 5 2020)
4:24 - Grease Gun (Call of Duty WW2)
-
4:40 - M1928A1 (Battlefield 5 2020)
4:56 - M1928 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
5:11 - MP-28 (Battlefield 5 2020)
5:30 - Waffe 28 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
5:45 - Type 100 (Battlefield 5 2020)
6:02 - Type 100 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
6:17 - Sten (Battlefield 5 2020)
6:36 - Sten (Call of Duty WW2)
-
6:51 - MAB 38 (Battlefield 5 2020)
7:09 - ORS0 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
7:25 - EMP (Battlefield 5 2020)
7:43 - Erma EMP (Call of Duty WW2)
-
8:00 - ZK-383 (Battlefield 5 2020)
8:19 - ZK-383 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
8:34 - Type 2A (Battlefield 5 2020)
8:50 - Nambu Type 2 (Call of Duty WW2)
Rifles
9:09 - STG 44 (Battlefield 5 2020)
9:29 - STG 44 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
9:45 - SturmGewehr 1-5 (Battlefield 5 2020)
10:06 - VolkSSturmGewehr (Call of Duty WW2)
-
10:21 - Breda M1935 (Battlefield 5 2020)
10:45 - Itra Burst (Call of Duty WW2)
-
11:12 - M1 Garand (Battlefield 5 2020)
11:19 - M1 Garand (Call of Duty WW2)
-
11:34 - M1 Carbine (Battlefield 5 2020)
11:52 - M1A1 Carbine (Call of Duty WW2)
-
12:09 - M2 Carbine (Battlefield 5 2020)
12:27 - M2 Carbine (Call of Duty WW2)
-
12:45 - Gewehr 43 (Battlefield 5 2020)
13:06 - Gewehr 43 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
13:25 - Karabin 1938M (Battlefield 5 2020)
13:48 - Karabin (Call of Duty WW2)
-
14:05 - Kar98K (Battlefield 5 2020)
14:31 - Kar98K (Call of Duty WW2)
-
14:55 - Lee Enfield NO.4 MKI (Battlefield 5 2020)
15:19 - Lee Enfield (Call of Duty WW2)
-
15:41 - Type 99 Arisaka (Battlefield 5 2020)
16:03 - Type 38 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
16:29 - Commando Carbine (Battlefield 5 2020)
16:50 - De Lisle (Call of Duty WW2)
Machine Guns
17:26 - Bar M1918A2 (Battlefield 5 2020)
17:46 - Bar (Call of Duty WW2)
-
18:01 - FG-42 (Battlefield 5 2020)
18:19 - FG-42 (Call of Duty WW2)
-
18:37 - Bren Gun (Battlefield 5 2020)
18:59 - Bren Gun (Call of Duty WW2)
-
19:28 - Lewis Gun (Battlefield 5 2020)
19:53 - Lewis Gun (Call of Duty WW2)
-
20:22 - MG42 (Battlefield 5 2020)
20:39 - MG42 (Call of Duty WW2)
Launchers
21:10 - Bazooka (Battlefield 5 2020)
21:26 - Bazooka (Call of Duty WW2)
Other
21:41 - M2 Flamethrower (Battlefield 5 2020)
21:59 - M2 Flamethrower (Call of Duty WW2)
Like the video and watch it complete so it is recommended to more people and so Tigerfield is happy!
Thanks
Underrated comment
Bf 5 2020? I don't thing so
What happened to the PPSh?
20:39 How did they manage to mess up the MG42 of all guns.
It’s always gotta be a brrt
because its a modern cod lol
BFV has recoil even though bipod is deployed, CoD has low firerate and looks like the wrong reload animation
@@pepsimanv6124 Bipods are used to help manage and reduce the recoil, not get rid of it entirely.
@@daniellarson4677 but BFV didnt reduce the recoil
No birds were harmed during the filming of this video
😂😂😂
Lmao
The sky was tho
Phew.. was Worried For a Second
Battlefield : BANG BANG BANG
Call of duty : piow piow piow...
Can we stop with comments like these
Battlefield: pluff pluff pluff
Cod modern warfare 2019: BANG BANG BANG!!
@@UnRandomMisterioso nah
@@UnRandomMisterioso Yes!
@@SLOWOT bro,the sound of the guns in mw2019 is so brutal and realistic
Battlefield: I'm going to reload my scope gun the only way I can by reloading single rounds
Cod: I'm going to reload my bolt gun the by shoving a striper clip into it at an impossible angle
You also put in a full clip when doing a tactical reload
@@lememes1135 lazy animators lol
At least BFV looks and sounds good. Can’t say the same for WW2.
The maps on release weren’t very good except for two, but the maps added after release were 100% beautifully done had the atmosphere the release maps were missing
about gun realism, BF5 beats COD WW2!
Yeah the guns in cod ww2 were so shity
But still love cod
@@justmegrez2929 sorry, but Battlefield beats Cod also in multiplayer! After Cod black Ops II, the saga fell down
sgarly true but modern warfare 2019 is kinda and I mean kinda reviving the series I just hope treyarch can’t fuck up cod 2020
@@sgarly6548 MW and Warzone have saved COD
Cod and bf are very different in their multiplayer modes. Cod is an arcade type of multiplayer, while bf5 is full on war.
4:30 the M3 Grease Gun fires from an open bolt. If you listen carefully, the sound for the cocking animation includes a bolt being cycled forward, something that you can't hear on an open bolt gun.
the charging handle would still make an audible noise when it moves back forward though. that is the first model of the grease gun, that had a separate charging handle.
Parker Brassard yeah but it’s way to audible to make sense
@@mondaymotivator_ not really. it's a giant handle that's basically like the handle on a wind up toy. it would make sense for it to make that much noise.
Reading this comment made my head hurt
Go on x0.25 and see,
It actually goes forward
The boss when you fight him: Battlefield 5
The boss when you unlock them as a playable character: Cod Ww2
BF5 fanboy
@@CharlesVDoktaur he meant the graphics and reload animations
USSR Gaming. Oh okay
Both of them are shit
@@UnchiuBaros i would argue tha BFV reloads are worse. They just seem so unrealistic and cringey
Next:Battlefield V vs Minecraft
Damn man, you have the whole comment section laughing
@@a.hauptmann8798 Thanks man.
Minecraft is better
@@nicosalwaystired HAHAHA😂
Irabati Das obviously Pac-Man won
Can we please have a game one day where a pump action shotguns pump action animation is in sync with the audio?
Yes... Battlefield V. It doesn't take someone with 20/20 vision to see that it was in sync.
I mean they where both in time what are you talking about?
?
Modern Warfare: am i a joke to u?
Battlefield for me
Okie
agreed
Yeah
My man
Battlefield had so much potential.
If only it had kept the same system as bf1 but in ww2 , it would have been amazing in my opinion but no, innovation was their downfall. Also the fucking Battle Royale that failed completely
@@georgemakrov6174 its the worst battlefield
@@darkzero7969 no, that goes to BC2.
@@norbertsoltesz1012 its your opinion but 95% of people say it was amazing...
@@darkzero7969 95% of people, nice "statistics" you got there. i gueess i was wrong. lma still the worst in the modern battlefields. even hardline was better.
CoD WW2's reload is good and all, but there's always something missing
What about the m1 garand reload of cod ww2
@@potatopatch8943 Well, the mid-reload can be accepted, as the bolt wouldn't slam forward on it's own sometimes due to mud, or bad maintenance. Yet still, they could've done different animations like BFV did, so nobody would complain about it
A lot of CoD WW2’s weapons sound like the devs were fiddling with the same tin can over and over again. The weapons in CoD WW2 always sounded weak to me
@@thelaggyowl3677 Yeah, both the firing and reloading sounds are not completely nice, the beta had way better sounds (not the reloading sounds tho)
The reload animations are good, but the reload sounds are unsatisfying and samey. Only weapon that had different sounds and actually sounded good when reloading was the FG42.
15:27
Reloads 5 bullets
*10 rounds filled*
*L O G I C*
R E A L I S T I C
There was only 5 shots.
@@Frosty_V0 yea man there are still so much people who don't know the difference between a round and a bullet
So sad...
He only fired five rounds and then he reloaded one charger holding five. So yes it is accurate and logical.
I love how IW made one 1911 reload and re-used it since MW1.
Infinity Ward didn’t develop WW2.
@@Skiivin yeah,sledgehammergames develop it
@@comradecommissar8272 he means call of duty in general
Same with the AK-47 the only one that changed it (I think) was MW2019
@@mashedpotatoesgaming454 I'm pretty sure that BO3 changed it with AK reload, BO4 just reused BO3's AK reload, Ghosts also had different AK reload as well as Advanced Warfare or Infinite Warfare and also, besides MW19, Cold War also had new AK reload that practically looked almost identical to MW19 but it was different animation actually and it also looked worse technically, less realistic and natural.
Edit: MWII 22 also has new reload for AK that's entirely different to MW19's one.
Battlefield
FG42 firing like a Chauchat in COD WWII lol. Battlefield V on the other hand has horrific inaccuracies, but COD somehow manages to be even worse.
Yeah, BFV is horrifically inaccurate on so many things in general but at least the weapons are well animated and the animator/s clearly put effort in to it, meanwhile COD WW2 at least feels like WW2 buts it’s guns are so awful in terms of sound and how they function (like their fire rate and their reload animations) and it just feels like the animators for this game were just lazy or it was just rushed
Ah yes, I've been waiting for this
I have a mixed feelings about which **PING** is more satisfying
the-Dark-Writer-1994 battlefield by FAR.
Wish on bfv you could hear the ping even during the tactical reload
Cristian Zizioli That’s nit how the Garand works tho
Cristian Zizioli not how it works so BFV wins plus the sound is much better.
@@SlaveKnightGael1579 never said so duh
A battle of the two most underwhelming WW2 games of the decade. Beautiful.
😂😂
Sad the ps4 and xbox 1 never got a hit WW2 game.
@@neilhardie6312 true kind of glad ngl because imagine 9 year olds playing hell let loose or post scriptum
Wow 4 minutes ago the early bird must've caught the worm
Wow nobody cares
@@mjeverette3858 nobody cares about you either
Call of duty is comically bad. Did they do NO research on those firearms?
BFV nails weapon sounds, reloads, magazine capacities, extended magazine compatibilities, and to some extent, fire rates, than COD WW2.
Like how the Karabin in BFV is portrayed as a non detachable 10 rounder, which is legit, but in COD it was detachable. It's also how funny how COD's Thompson is called an M1928 when it's actually an M1A1, whereas BF actually used an M1928A1 Thompson with the correct drum capability.
It's a 50/50 honestly.
Some fire-rates in Battlefield are very wrong too. The BAR fires insanely fast, like twice as fast as it could. The Type 2A also fires twice as fast as it did in real-life. It only fired at ~650 RPM, which the Call of Duty one is much closer to that. The rocket launcher reloads are wrong in both, forgetting to connect the rocket to the electric connector on the launcher. The mag size of the Type 97 LMG is also wrong in V. Some textures also look better and more like war-era stamped metal in Call of Duty, like the Volksturmgewehr. I think the wood also looks better on most rifles in Call of Duty.
Some of the weapon models in Battlefield V like the M1928A1 and FG42 are also comically oversized. I've never seen a Thompson so fat and wide as Battlefield V portays it. Even if it's an M1A1, the Thompson in Call of Duty looks so much better and more like the real thing. You also don't need to pull the bolt back a Thompson. The bolt automatically goes back into place when you pull the trigger, which only Call of Duty shows correctly. I've also never seen an FG42 THAT big like in Battlefield V. It's almost as big as an MG42, it's like a 12 year-old child is holding it. The FG42 is pretty compact since it's a Battle rifle. The bolt on the StG 44 is also frightingly small compared to the real thing, and the M1A1 and M2 carbines are post-war models from the 1950s.
Battlefield V also messes up really bad by having the Panzerfaust being held on the shoulder, which makes operating the weapon literally impossible, since it fires in an arc like the PIAT. You're supposed to hold in under your shoulder like a rifle.
While Call of Duty calls an M1A1 a M1928, Battlefield makes the same mistake by calling the Type 1 in-game the Type 2A. The Type 2 in Call of Duty is an _actual_ Type 2. Battlefield messes up plenty of weapon names too.
It seems that a lot that Call of Duty got wrong Battlefield got wrong too.
Thanks for the long essay that was copy and paste
@@Ghost-sk7yp and half of it was wrong too
@@trondala9602 What's wrong about it?
@@Ghost-sk7yp Copy and pasted from....?
Bf5:dead game with forgotten battle Royale and feminism
Cod ww2:low budget gun sounds
And graphic they spend money only in loot boxes and zombie mode
Result:I play zombie mod of cod and
Bf5 with bots
Edit:black ops 4 is also an dead game
They are all bad games, AAA games but fails to impress me and others.
XD exactly
_Accurate._
Operator 23 IMO it’s campaign was pretty decent . The multiplayer was pretty bad fo r the first half of the games cycle but it improved big time after Michael Condry left .
Nah bf5 has risen out of the ashes with the pacific
I still say you need to do a Battlefield 1 vs Tannenberg weapon comparison
1:22 play on 2x and it sounds like smg
Yes
The book vs the movie
Graphics aside.
I think WW2 has Better Reload Animations while Battlefield has the Best Sound design.
....even though that's always been that way since the old COD vs BF games so.
Until the New MW finally changed the Sound Design which is now on par with BF games.
No bf5 wins
@@67midnightmoon read the entire comment again but slowly
@@ifitsnotbrokedontfixit24435 shhh, dont tell him to read again, he cannot read *flies away
Sound design in this game is TOO good. Like bro i can hear ennemy's footsteps from a kilometer away
Some of the cod reload anims are nice(Thompson etc.) but some are utterly bad(K98K, No.4, FG42, etc. They are totally wrong).
When I heard the 1911 comparison I laughed at how bad the cod ww2 1911 sounded
Cool video
Ironically they both failed at being ww2 shooters
Well at least COD WW2's campaign still feels like ww2, BFV's campaign feels like a 12 year old SJW's interpretation of WW2, with the exception of the Last tiger. Don't get me wrong they're both mediocre at best but COD is just a bit better. I'm not a COD fanboy but I gotta give credit where it's due.
mlplarisanable brooooo WW2 sucks battlefield V is so much better in gameplay map design and graphics your just angry cause women are in your WW2 game
@@mlplarisanable Nordlys was bad but The Last Tiger and Tirailleur were decent
Smarr kidd Atleast COD WW2 didn’t have the support pulled after just two years
@@smarrkidd5538 Idiot, read my comment again, I said that both games are bad. Maybe work on your reading comprehension, so you don't make yourself look stupid and pathetic, 'kay, BFV fanboy?
The CoD WWII M30 shotgun also has the rifle round. I wonder why he didn't showcase it
He doesn’t show the detachable box magazine reload for the Gewehr 43 in BFV. So he doesn’t add any attachments to the guns.
You have to level the gun up, i think he was just showing the weapons without any attachments
@@billybomb1570 there were several with attachmemts though
@@PU8698 where
@@TheNamesSnek in the video. Gewehr 43 for example
Where's the vote of which game is better tho lol
RUclips removed polls for some reason
@@donsmith4935 that sucks
I don't know why they removed it, even though there's no replacement
No competition
It is amazing how people in this comment section is ww2 gun expert just because they play games and watched couple of ww2 videos
It's not a matter of being experts, it's just common sense. I mean, the MG42 is one of the fastest firing machinegun of WW2, everybody knows that. Yet for some reason COD did, well, that thing.
Sum of the reloads in ww2 sounds like u put a brick on another brick
When you're wearing headphones or listening in speakers, COD WWII gun sounds generate more bass than Battlefield V, but COD WWII lacks echo and crisp sound making it kinda unsatisfying
Battlefield 5 gunplay is sooouch better than COD ww2. We know that
Next: Modern warfare 2019 vs gacha life
How about bf4 vs phantom force
@@binhduc1182 good comparison, Phantom Forces is heavily inspired by Battlefield.
@@paleoph6168 LMAO HAHA
@@FreedomAssassin64 for real though, it IS heavily inspired by Battlefield.
@@paleoph6168 Ik, but it would be funny if Tigerfield made a BF4 vs Phantom Forces comparison video lol
I like how that for all their accuracy in reload animations, BF still gets the M1 Garand wrong, by ejecting the bullets mid clip like that. Yes, the catch release on the side allows you to release the clip, but at the speed he reloads, that's clearly not what he's doing. He just pulls the rod all the way to the rear and the clip flies out.
It needs to pull all the way back to lock it open tho. One thing BF did got wrong is reloading when there's 1 round left, in game the round is still contained in the clip, but irl it would be ejected first, then the empty clip would fly out.
@Some guys and their games Yeah it should be the main thumb tho, to reserve the ammo.
Also the iron sight is too big and too thin
@@hngh6404 that's a given with battlefield V to improve gameplay or something
I like realism just as much as the other guy, but this is bullshit nitpicking.
Just as the one with the "soldiers were trained to operate handguns single handedly in WW2".
I know that was the standard procedure, but the way it is represented doesn't make it non plausible.
Both games have good animations, though BF5 has more good ones than WW2. Where BF5 really wins is sound design. All the reload sounds in WW2 are like the same two tin cans being banged into each other.
@@kaistzar2831 you give too much credit to the sound designers of cod ww2, it sounds the same no matter where you are lol
@@s_for_short2400 well mw 2019 shits on any game when it comes to gunsounds
That detachable mag for the Arisaka and Karibin hurts me along with cod's insistence on loading rifles with stripper clips when there isn't room. Oh I fired 3 rounds from my 10 round capacity Lee Enfield let's load a 5 round stripper clip. That always bugs me.
Lazy animators are to blame
After going back to cod ww2 that shit feels dated, cods just don’t age well. To compare it to bf5 just isn’t fair
5:10
First of all WHY THATS VERY UNCOMFORTABLE!
I’m not sure but I thinks it’s because the shooter can rest his elbow on his knee when crouching and shooting. There might be some other reason that I’m missing though.
Ikr
You can control the recoil better when you hold like that. In CoD is uncomfortable
@@icantthinkausername1136 i meant the thumb, it looks uncomfortable that way
every time I look at CoD WWII
"WTF"
It almost looks like a mobile game tbh
@@RonnieRonnie3697 what type of drugs are you on
@@RonnieRonnie3697 what the fuck are you talking about?
I always played battlefield for multiplayer and call of duty for campaign
BFV: BOOM BOOM BOOM
CODWW2: pew pew pew
So fucking original, definitely not read a comment like this before.
YESSSSSS!!!!!!!
@Dog Paws Bold of you to assume that i'm getting mad at a fact.
Crest Raizn I mean, CoD MW guns sounds just as good as Bf, but yea, I agree, all the previous CoDs gun sounds sounded like shit compared to bf
Cod WW2 has gotta be one of the worst AAA games ever made in terms of expectations and capability from the studio vs. the final project. The animations, guns, recoil, sounds, models, everything was just so shit.
Actually bo4 is the worst one out of them
@@abassalqattan7820 cant argue with that
Cod: realistic enough for a fast pase shooter
Battlefield: smol hands
> CoD
> Realistic
I have no words to say, this is a dedicated bruh moment
@@91tears94 it's realistic enough I didn't say it's realistic it Just realistic enough
@@91tears94 You come from 4chan?
stas Ž. Well that not makes any sense at all
@@91tears94 are ya stupid? I'm saing that it's realistic enough for a cod what do you not understand?! You know what I'm not gonna argue with an idiot on internet......have good day
Battlefield had always awesome sounds. COD gun sounds were always terrible but in COD WW2 those guns didn't even sound like guns no recoil or anything. And that sound of MP40 in COD is terrible. I never heard a terrible sound like this before.
Are all guns in cod ww2 suppressed??
So which one went more woke!
Reading this comment section will be funny :)
Nah is not..
It is not funny, it is sad
•TheKaisTzar • well actually it is true but the real gunshot have a reverb based on a place
Yeah it's funny.
I only like the campaign of Cod WW2 though.And the only thing loud in Multiplayer is hitmarker
Both didn’t age good.
I do prefer BFV's weapons since they do give a more natural firing sound and reloads fit the weapons perfectly.
COD WW2 is just someone playing with metal pipes and bolts.
But both kinda lack in loud banging when firing as it is like as if the players had noise filter headsets.
16:11 why did you put extended mags on it just keep it all default your doing a comparison not showing your classes
The Fun Fact Guy The EMP also has extended mags and the ZK383 has that weird lens sight also.
It’s because they’re dlc weapons locked behind supply drops, so Tigerfield is probably using that random weapon perk to get them and so they have randomised attachments.
The reload is probably the same anyway since cod just reuses every stripper clip animation
I think BF5 is a good game tbh. If the animations and guns are good its ok with me
Dude how to get the VOLKSSTURMGEWEHR in cod2ww2, I’ve played for 2 years opened hundreds of supply drops but still no
Idk and dont care
@@67midnightmoon then don't reply
I got it through a challenge about a year and a half ago.
It's not even worth getting anymore.
Maybe you have to be a prestige to unlock that weapon, but idk, just check the requirements to unlock the weapon
Nobody care about both games now
CoD ww2, bf, they are pretty* dead.
No more toxicity in the comments
This is a bad opinion and just wrong
So tell what you think
Entiny millions of people play both games (maybe not millions on cod) there not dead do you consider them this cause neither have gotten an update as of late or cause you don’t like them so no one does why do you think this
Well that makes sense
In Battlefield's defense Battlefield V still has a lot of full servers running on PS4 Japanese and Singaporean servers in every large mode (except Grand Ops) and TDM
Battlefield 5
battelfield : The total sound is good
call of duty : reloading ASMR
Although BFV floored CoD with this one I do appreciate CoD WW2 for having different animations for all of the guns. They didn't reuse as much as the others.
They still got most of the animations as wrong
Elliot Rahman
I know, but they're still not as bad as people say they were.
In COD WWII guns sound like when you slapping a concrete with a fly swatter
Battlefield 5
Bf V is better in every aspect
You have to give credit to both games that tried they're best to make it "accurate". Either way, both games have their own strengths and weaknesses, and even though Battlefield V's weapons are superior, I prefer Cod WW2.
Why? Cod ww2 is the worst ww2 game i have ever seen and is not realistic at all
agree
@@67midnightmoon Your opinion isn't everyone's opinion.
@@67midnightmoon same. I still enjoy it tho lmao
You didn't even show the rifle bullet for the M30 Drilling in CoD WWII... smh.
BFV: Skinny bones
CoDWW2: Silencer
Anyone else notice how the fire rates for cod are just way to off from realism. I could be wrong but I just feel like something isnt right 🤷🏻♂️
At least BF5 got it right with the M1 garand, when you eject a loaded clip it does not make the ping sound
ruclips.net/video/Bimz8JS1cN0/видео.html
ok
Bananas 2262627 He said a LOADED clip not an empty one dipass...
@@prodigypvp5710 you didn't have to call him dipass and so what if your comment was a month ago?
Alright if you guys think the Thompson reload from COD WW2 is wrong it's a yes and no, yes it is an Open bolt weapon but people complain about not pulling the bolt after switching to a fresh full magazine and people defend it for being an open bolt but you have to have the most powerful awareness and memory to memorize how many shots you fired in real combat while in full automatic and other gunshots all around you so yeah in conclusion: You gotta have the most powerful awareness to know your magazine is empty and the bolt hasn't been closed yet otherwise it'll be impossible to notice it while you're in real combat and I think they've done this because for balancing reasons and I can see that but the rate of fire of the MG42 is just pure disgusting they should've lowered the damage and keep its 1200-1500 RPM in place
Personally cod is worse but bf on the other hand is much more realistic but cod is better with story and bf better with multiplayer
Weapons sounds are very 'meh' for me in CODWW2
Me first time playing battlefield 1:"OMG i need automatic gun*see Trench carbine* finally automa- wait"
K
Damn so fuckin funny
Where is the punchline?
@@PU8698 *There is no punchline.*
BF is better graphics and realistic but COD is a lot easier to play and hang around.
Battlefield be like, you know what makes sense? An underhand mag grip in combat on the MP28, yeah... yeah that looks totally natural...
Enyo Sarac yeah that killed me a little bit inside
It’s just to show off those amazing nails
Helps with recoil at least
It was doctrine since the mp18 days in WWI to hold it like that
So cod ww2 had fewer launch weapons than world at war and then they had 4x launch weapons
Only thing was that you had to onen supply dropd
Call of Duty fan or Battlefield fan, we can all agree that both of these ww2 games are terrible and an awful representation of WW2.
Bf5 is more realistic
yes
@@67midnightmoon realistic XD
@@67midnightmoon What part of Battlefield 5 is realistic?? The prologue where they have a Tiger Tank in the WRONG TIME PERIOD?? The part where they have a Sten Gun in the WRONG TIME PERIOD? The fact that the British Army recruits a theif in spec ops mission? What part is realistic???
BFV is rEaLiStIc : Volksturmgewehr-5 is full automatic and be used in 1941 🤣
After codmw19, I thought we were getting a cod comeback. Then warzone came and it was just kinda there... The guns and sounds were enough realistic for a cod game, but the movement just reminds me about that black ops nightmare. If only the movement and animations were slowed down and cod will feel like a semi-semi milsim game.
Battlefield V sounds far better.
Looks much better as well
At least cod has an accurate story, unlike bfv.
Deal with it
@@fcp2004 i mean your not wrong cod is better with story and bf is better with multiplayer
@@fcp2004 uh oh fanboy
@@fcp2004 lol
If COD is going back to WW2, I hope it won't be anything like COD WW2 was
Call of duty modern warfare 2019 has better sounds than Battlefield.
Nah
@@joaoclemente1413 yes, yes, much better sounds.
The only thing good is The model of guns
Dude this video isn’t even about that game.
@@eggrollplatter2543 I know, I just said that modern warfare 2019 has better sounds.
M1 garand
BF - POW POW POW FSHIIIIII
COD - toc toc fshiii
This is like iphone vs android
More like android vs iPhone.
Cod ww2 has fire rate of SMG higher than usual and LMG has significantly low fire rate
Curious how you were able to get stuff like the Type 2a comparison wrong so badly (its the wimmersperg in ww2) but whatever
call of duty feels like a mobile game
Man they should’ve added the mosen nagant
☭ ☭ ☭
both are bad
You're not wrong