A Brief History of Time 1991 FULL | Stephen Hawking
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июл 2020
- A film about the life and work of the cosmologist, Stephen Hawking, who despite his near total paralysis, was one of the great minds of all time.
Развлечения
Развлечения
man had the worst but made the best RIP
yo the chicken caught me off guard
I cried when she said “astronomical atlas”.
Stephen Hawking's mind is enormously full of knowledge towards theory of evolution and things that be in the universe his wisdom is profound in a way and despite his illness he continued to proceed in a knowledgeable position in his field he left us in a woooooow now he Rest among the stars of our universe of the dark matter and black holes and planets 📚📚📚
Still able to use the strongest muscle of the body, amazing resilience Mr. Hawking!
He has a lot advanced thorough theories with a lot of details to explain things that we do not understand!
Thank you!
this needs more views, wth is going on!?
they using tik tok insta and other shits they dont have time for this kind a things
Asuma I am an Englishman and I grew up in Armenia as an Armenian. What do you think never stayed true. Achqid mernem. Glaza. Inherited blindness chgitein inch er.
heartbreaing
How are we supposed to remember the future if we have never lived it...
We can't possibly remember what's never been experienced.We can project
I beg your pardon, why is the original Errol Morris fim is here inverted? Much more better in HD resolution... Why inverted? Thank you.
Copyright reasons
Not just inverted, but some bits are actually cut. Whether it's copyright reasons or just poor editing, I do not know, but it is very annoying, and most prominent at 48:42 where even the sound is cut. Luckily there is another, uninverted and uncut version uploaded by another user that also has the ending credits, I am just angry I only realised this after almost 50 mins into watching this version...
i am here coz my teacher said so
I’m here because I’m dumb and wanna get smarter
Cool teacher
WHY DID THAT HAPPEN TO HIM.? IS THERE A LINK BETWEEN HIS GENIUS AND HIS AILMENT? ARE WE ALLOWED by the universe to FIGURE at that level. It's almost like the universe tried to prevent him from testifying
Okay
Video title is not correct, this is "A Brief History IN Time"... This is not "A Brief History of Time". This is still an excellent video, I'm just letting those know who were looking for the other book.
The movie literally stated itself as "A Brief History OF Time". Look at the opening credits.
Hello. An origen on time. Talking back as an rhyme. A new spark. Not dead. My baby egg. I take. And then make. A movie. I am comming from. And now i am following the one.
I don't have time for this.
😂
4
sounds like bobby fischer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EXTREMELY BRIEF ! ! ! !
THIS IS NOT A SCIENCE THEORY DOCUMENTARY , IT'S A ""BED TIME STORY"",,,
1
A Calcium? Mice ate your Calcium instead of cheese.
Apple tree was growing by itself. Worms were eating it, if worms can eat it, so can we. How many apples were left on the tree? One, and I can have it, thanks. Since when Apple is a medicine? I opyat, kogda yevo yest, ya yem, kogda netu ne yem. Tot A kogda netu, tsena kakaya? Potom nam tsenu podnyat ili net? Asuma elektraenergiya ochen desheva stoit, no kogda netu, ne desheva oboshlis.
#withlove From #radiostayrock #stayrock
Bb
niels bhoring
Time is nothing but an illusion.
How can it be an illusion of we can't see it and it has zero MATTER. It simply doesn't exist.
There definitely must be a very tiny time step invariance concerning the vector of time. In other words there must be a quantum of time within which time vector has both directions literally at the same time. If that wasn’t the case everything would be pre determined and humans would not be able to act on free will.
Utter b.s
Isn’t that under the assumption we act under “free will?” (Your definition of free will influences the equation.)
Poor Stephen Hawking it breaks my heart to see him in this condition but he is a very brave and strong man and he still tries hard everyday to do the best he can to be famous, smart and successful! RIP Stephen Hawking 😢😢😢😢😢😢
Resilience ❤ even though he was near totally paralyzed the strongest muscle you managed to still use and very well..
2
This is "in time" not "of time"
God downloaded 66
Penrose's comments about the "much deeper purpose" of the universe is religiously inclined by the sound of it. Having said that, one's inspiration for doing science must come from somewhere and one can always argue that inspiration as a religious feeling since it can be not so logical where one gets the feeling of inspiration from. I think Penrose's use of the word "fruitful" says it all. It is not apparently not very rewarding or romantic or exciting to think of the universe or life as a mechanism that is just there with no purpose or an underlying intelligence behind it. However, truth is not always(actually most of the time) fruitful or romantic. It can be harsh. We may be hard wired to believe in fruitful pictures of the universe so we can continue living this biological life without feeling hopeless and depressed all the time. As the apparent intelligent pinnacle of the biological life, human beings may need the romantic or mystical belief to function with 'sanity' in the social animal setting. Lot more philosophy and neuroscience research are needed from western philosophy/science perspective to understand l the very likely religious wiring of the human brain. I say "western" because Eastern part of the world, namely India and China, might have done enough thinking and research into that area some few thousands of years ago.(Upanishad and Buddhism).
When he said that viewing the universe as a computer is not a fruitful view he probably meant that doing so doesn't assist someone in understanding the universe. He also used the word "helpful" in the same context. Saying something is not fruitful or helpful, in this context, is not synonymous with saying it is not rewarding, romantic, or exciting.
@@camer7976 If he meant "digital" computer by a computer, then yes, it is not very fruitful to view the universe as a computer. However, whether the universe is an information processor in the sense what our brain apparently is, then the universe can be, but only if we expand or modify our view or philosophy of what consciousness is. However, in the strictest sense of how we do the thinking in western science in this era, we probably don't want to see the universe as a computer of any kind. That is because in this era we go by what we can see and detect from our senses and equipment about the universe(telescopes and whatnot).
I think he is using the term fruitful in the scientific sense - not in a romantic or poetic sense. An idea is fruitful if it generates fresh insights and helps formulate new hypotheses that have a good track record of being confirmed experimentally.
What does that have to do with religion lol
GOD is NATURE and HIS religion is SCIENCE. The rituals of IT(RELIGION) is research. Scientists are Prohets Messengers and the like. Faith is- (in its original definition,)RIDICULOUS😂. It's a miracle that mankind has figured ourselves and the universe out. Not completely or even a little bit but we're moving in the right direction. 1000yrs ago science was considered evil and ungodly therefore holding back progress. TRUE RELIGION (SCIENCE) WAS BANNED.COINCIDENCE ?😮IDK BUT MANKIND IS COMING AROUND NICELY.NATURE does and is doing everything the Bible said God did.❤Love and fear is the most needed energy source used to perpetuate our biological and spiritual existenceIn short YAY SCIENCE😊
Shaqar chein karoxanum utel, el inch chein utum? @nkuyz. Potom kto shto yest? Mi myaso syeli sshas lucshe vidim. A dlya golovi? Potom Apples syeli, lucshe stalo, opyat a dlya mazgov? A mazgi ne rabotayut. A u Stephena Hawkinga ruki i nogi. I tak eksperimentirovali, groprinosin tvetsinq, kanachi chi utum kam utuma, es aretsinq lriv @nkav achqits. Asuma axiqd traqatsretsi, hima inch es zgum? Disgust. Heto shan lakot ari stex, u eli... Ruku podnimayut, why???? Nam interesno znat. A kto ne podnimayet? Stephen Hawking. Asuma intellektualner@ irants ein arden spanum, yes es qaqi takits durs ekox@ chem. A posle sebya nichevo ne ostavili. :P.