The best way i have found to use an Apache or a longbow, if you're using hellfires, is to put it on a long road at low altitude and use it like an AT gun. Whenever people push they move up the AA last so they are just completely unprepared and you can also run out of range really fast
Im a fan of using them behind my line and hiding them until I see a push begin to adance. Take out a couple units and bounce, the the ground units clean up
Recently played a game against someone keeping their helis in the backline to prevent me from pushing. Ended up sending a fighter plane after them since they didn't have enough of AA to shoot down my plane before i took out their helis.
Had a really good match on your side of the map from the opponent side I was finally able to push the guy off G and set up an Armata in that hill looking over that who side. It wrecked for a good amount of time.
my personal decks are using is literally like 5 different variations of marine airborne. I only take standard airborne inf, full AA, full weapons squad and two stacks of marine raiders depending how much spare points usage i have. i literally place infantry in contested/high traffic roads and travel routes towards the cap points my team has and just help them defend. I bring so little because theyre easier to micro in a small group, I can be make them as efficient as possible if need be. Two Global Hawks and both sniper teams, snipers infil'd in with black hawks behind lines that are also micro'd (altitude, specific route that I handpick), then I just leave them behind enemy lines to lase or just update enemy movements for my planes. A ton of SEAD in the form of prowlers and AR/AT equipped harriers that are in constant rotation with strike eagles and f35 jdams. today ive been trying f15 ex's with the cruise missiles and max 35's with 2ea1000lb jdams. very fun lmao, i tend to finish with 3+kd and literally help turn around losing games with the constant recon and bombing runs racking up elimination points.
Use of ballistic and cruise missiles definitely is one of plus points of the game for me. Really fun to watch and useful if done right. Also I could not understand the plan of opposition. Not pushing with their tanks, just spamming Ballistic Missiles, airdropping troops, air strikes.......
They ruin it for me. Anytime anything gets spotted its shot from every direction by arty and missles. If I bring In a pivads it gets SEAD’D. They need cap limit on units. If you lose your arty you cant buy more like in wargame
Watch 11:16 in the video. His single 7 man squad gets spotted and within 15 seconds has like 6 cruise missles shot at it. It ruins any form of fun or strategy when everything you have gets cross map nuked
@@SpoopyWhite nah man it genuinely just seems like a skill issue and there isn't anything wrong with that you should always move things periodically no matter what, and if its an important asset then you should have recon probing frontlines and guarding your flanks to make sure they cant get a spot. if its the uavs i get it but you can see it all coming from miles away you just got to move.
@@SpoopyWhite It's one of reason why I like them and why I wanted them to be included in game like this for a long time. They are truly fulfilling their purpose of long-range precision artillery. They've been an important part of strategy since forever in real life and would be included in strategies by a commander during any battle. So I'm liking it, even though I have been spammed by lots of them in matches, makes things more modern in terms of capability, also yeah. I can get on board with losing a unit like that means lost forever.
@ wargame red dragon the better the unit the less you get. 2 m1a2s if they die your out for the rest of the game it promotes strategy and playing safe. In BA you lose 6 artillery units wait 90 seconds and youve got 6 more on the way
Also fire and forget missiles on aircraft are such high value for money if you coordinate coming slightly later than your teammates planes because the enemy counter measures are depleted.
Only having one blackhawk is insane to me, I run like 4-5 and 1 chinook and just set up tiny supply depots every time I drop a team or two. Regardless, fantastic match.
I really they would add terrain deformation or at least some crater scaring on the map. One of the best things from WiC is after a long battle to see the before vs. after battlefield.
I'm glad you enjoy this game, because I wouldn't want to play it but I'm interested enough to watch while I do something else. Sometimes, some really cool shit happens. Other times, a Longbow struggles to destroy a single tank from a distance of
I miss 'World In Conflict'. It's available at GOG, but isnt' playable on modern systems. It had beautiful environmental destruction and none of the build-decks-of-cards weirdness of modern RTS stuff. This feels similar, visually. This is also the only one which bothers to include modern units. Not sure why so many decided to stagnate technological progression in the eighties.
Having technology from the 1980s makes allot of sense. In real history the threat of a real ww3 was the Soviets vs NATO, both were incredibly powerful. The Soviets were no joke, in technology or in military numbers. Once you get into the 1990s the USA was a global superpower unlike the world had seen for centuries. With the fall of the Soviet Union the United States was militarily superior to any other nations really up until today, with only Now China starting to compete. People want the 1980s because that's when a "fair" fight with a major superpower was a real possibility. The only other way to have that is going for a future scenario like 2030-2040 when China hypothetically could rival the US / NATO
@@-Zevin- It wouldn't have been a fair fight, no. It reached its military height during the seventies. There's nothing wrong with having various different eras as options. I just don't understand why that's a forced limitation for many games now.
@@Xenomorphine The Soviets were very capable and rivaled and surpassed the US in many areas up until the late 1980s. I'm just pointing out that the "forced limitation" is one based on reality. To have a exciting game you want a compelling conflict, WW2, a hypothetical cold war gone hot etc. Something with real stakes, with players involved who are powerhouses. It's the same reason a good boxing match involves the two best fighters going at it. Nobody gets excited watching a heavyweight world champion beat a 120 pound kid, and that's just what the situation was post 1990s. There is no compelling case for a real threat to the US or NATO at that time. The technology of 1990s and early 2000s stuff is cool, iconic firearms and technology, but there just isn't a conflict in that time frame that is high stakes. Now on the original topic, I agree about world in conflict, loved it. So ahead of its time, I have lots of great memories playing that game, and calling in the airstrikes or tactical nuke was incredible.
I _LOVE_ the terrain in this game. WARNO/Wargame's engines seem to rely on really flat terrain, which gets boring after a while. This map looks like a genuine satellite scan, and has all the dynamic terrain that comes with it.
I love that you can fill up a transport with multiple types of units in this game, and then again the ballistic missile spam is ruining it for me currently, even though it looks rly cool ofc.
The M1150 is definitely cool, super nice little piece of indirect artillery. Glad you went with the tube artillery but if you went with it even earlier then I think that would've been really helpful in hitting their Patriots and Counter-Battery. Obviously you were trying to hold on there and were pretty thin for some of that though.
As long as you can prove that they had hostile intent, and I assume they weren't landing UN troops for negotiations, then you can shoot paratroopers. You cannot however shoot people that have ejected from aircraft and no longer present harm.
I adore Broken Arrow, and a primary reason for this fondness is the missile system. The strategic combination of ballistic missile barrages and ground troops is extremely superb and very fun to watch, and I hope to see VulcanHDGaming utilize this tactic in future videos.
The missiles aystema are definitely the sellling point for this game to me as well, but currently it doesn’t work well with the other unit types imo, there is still heavy balancing to be done
i feel the range of the patriot missiles was drastically reduced... is that possible? In return, the range of the Russian AA like Antjev seems to be much higher
Infantry is definitely strong if you position them well, the point is they get annihilated by any type of missile or bomb, no chance. And it is all air ordnance spam all the time in this game…
Ehh, infantry is definitely more defensive but still important. What? Were you expecting Joe and Dimitry to take a 120mm Heat shell to the chest and not be turned to a red stain?
So far this game has been underwhelming unfortunately. Warno is definitely my preference still. But those Bradley’s kicked ass which surprised me coming from Warno where they fall flat in any armor engagement
Really? For some reason i always lose against helicopters…my stingers/shorad wont do shit agianst Enemy Apaches…tho when its the other way around, my Apache is gone in one second….
think this guy made a mistake trying to take out the stingers instead of just blasting the high rise towers. edit - lol a minute later he starts doing exactly that.
Depends on who you ask, I play Warno a lot and have played Wargame in the past. The biggest difference is the modern missile ordnance utilised in the game by artillery and air units. it hasn’t rly been implemented in an rts game similar to this before and it definitely feels off to me. The battlefield scale of BA also feels wrong if I compare it to Warno. It is also an early stage of the game and Warno has been released some time now.
It’s fun for sure, but Warno is more developed and balanced in my experience as a rts game. Logically so maybe as BA is still in semi-early development. I hope they will make some changes to BA still.
@ as true as that is, it’s most definitely in a playable state and as long as you aren’t an idiot with your money a majority of early access games can release in much more advanced states than games that were just being developed under the cover
@@JohnstyPonst spamming missiles costs too much pts/supply without using it more carefully. I laugh when i move my inf and see like three missiles hit an empty building.
Yesn't. Currently it's manly PvP (1 pve scenario) but it will have a full campaign and solo/coop PvE possibilities. Besides that it's Currently in public/open beta testing.
Much to like with this game, I don't think the maps looks good for most parts but the design seems good. But then there are stuff like ballistic missiles fired from units on the map, planes launching cruise missiles from well on the map and so on. It is just insanely silly and break the immersion completely. It is a bit sad but not every game are to your taste and that's ok, but I don't understand what they gain by not just having standoff missiles come as a off board support? It seems like a very odd choice to me but maybe I am missing something...
You can take out the supply dumps, sneak recon to kill the missile launchers, and use fighters to ambush heavy bombers. The range scaling lets you compress 200km+ of combat to a smaller map. It works really well once you get the hang of it. On small maps the missile launchers are a lot more vulnerable, especially the aircraft launching cruise missiles.
Месяц назад
@@Alex-tc5kh So it is a question of game play balance, or maybe to give a sense of control? I get the idea then but it defeats the point of standoff weapons and makes range telescope depending on your point of view which just looks silly. But yes, I get the game play reason then. Thank you. :)
@ what im saying is is the GAME reflects LIFE. You ever heard the saying art imitates life? I dont really care if its a game. People have the freedom to do as they please. Low and behold people are using the strongest elements of the battlefield 🤷🏽 Its just an observation thats clearly happening
God, you let your infantry die again, you lack the support of armored units. Your infantry occupy buildings and are repeatedly hit by enemy long-range dynamic attacks, and you have no mobile units.
Man the voice lines are annoying, they talk sooo much and it's so cringy. It's like playing Command & Conquer in 2000, doesn't fit the theme of the game.
It’s called Line of Sight blockers. It don’t matter how good your binoculars are or if got thermal imaging in your tank optic. You can’t see through buildings
highly recommend removing the F-15EX from your decks. It's bugged or something and doesn't like firing it's missiles properly. You're way better off using the F-18C or spamming F-15C's. EX's are just great at wasting 800-1000 of your points in the beginning. Been using them since the closed beta and there's something definitely wrong with them
I felt like I had more success with the 15C than the EX, but just assumed it was a skill issue… I mean, it still could be, but this is still good to know.
"I don't need [the Patriot] in this case unless they start spamming ballistic missiles" is quite the foreshadowing/dramatic irony.
But also… when do they NOT spam ballistics?
I home the next specs have the patriots with the bigger missle racks
Or well the same rack but multiple .issles in one
@@cisarovnajosefina4525you can upgrade the patriot to have 4 missiles in 1 rack you know
The best way i have found to use an Apache or a longbow, if you're using hellfires, is to put it on a long road at low altitude and use it like an AT gun. Whenever people push they move up the AA last so they are just completely unprepared and you can also run out of range really fast
Im a fan of using them behind my line and hiding them until I see a push begin to adance. Take out a couple units and bounce, the the ground units clean up
Recently played a game against someone keeping their helis in the backline to prevent me from pushing. Ended up sending a fighter plane after them since they didn't have enough of AA to shoot down my plane before i took out their helis.
@jemangechien1496 Watch out for planes diving them though if they are in line of sight!
Had a really good match on your side of the map from the opponent side I was finally able to push the guy off G and set up an Armata in that hill looking over that who side. It wrecked for a good amount of time.
my personal decks are using is literally like 5 different variations of marine airborne. I only take standard airborne inf, full AA, full weapons squad and two stacks of marine raiders depending how much spare points usage i have. i literally place infantry in contested/high traffic roads and travel routes towards the cap points my team has and just help them defend. I bring so little because theyre easier to micro in a small group, I can be make them as efficient as possible if need be. Two Global Hawks and both sniper teams, snipers infil'd in with black hawks behind lines that are also micro'd (altitude, specific route that I handpick), then I just leave them behind enemy lines to lase or just update enemy movements for my planes. A ton of SEAD in the form of prowlers and AR/AT equipped harriers that are in constant rotation with strike eagles and f35 jdams. today ive been trying f15 ex's with the cruise missiles and max 35's with 2ea1000lb jdams. very fun lmao, i tend to finish with 3+kd and literally help turn around losing games with the constant recon and bombing runs racking up elimination points.
1:43 foreshadowing 😂
Use of ballistic and cruise missiles definitely is one of plus points of the game for me. Really fun to watch and useful if done right. Also I could not understand the plan of opposition. Not pushing with their tanks, just spamming Ballistic Missiles, airdropping troops, air strikes.......
They ruin it for me. Anytime anything gets spotted its shot from every direction by arty and missles. If I bring In a pivads it gets SEAD’D. They need cap limit on units. If you lose your arty you cant buy more like in wargame
Watch 11:16 in the video. His single 7 man squad gets spotted and within 15 seconds has like 6 cruise missles shot at it. It ruins any form of fun or strategy when everything you have gets cross map nuked
@@SpoopyWhite nah man it genuinely just seems like a skill issue and there isn't anything wrong with that you should always move things periodically no matter what, and if its an important asset then you should have recon probing frontlines and guarding your flanks to make sure they cant get a spot. if its the uavs i get it but you can see it all coming from miles away you just got to move.
@@SpoopyWhite It's one of reason why I like them and why I wanted them to be included in game like this for a long time. They are truly fulfilling their purpose of long-range precision artillery.
They've been an important part of strategy since forever in real life and would be included in strategies by a commander during any battle. So I'm liking it, even though I have been spammed by lots of them in matches, makes things more modern in terms of capability, also yeah. I can get on board with losing a unit like that means lost forever.
@ wargame red dragon the better the unit the less you get. 2 m1a2s if they die your out for the rest of the game it promotes strategy and playing safe. In BA you lose 6 artillery units wait 90 seconds and youve got 6 more on the way
Also fire and forget missiles on aircraft are such high value for money if you coordinate coming slightly later than your teammates planes because the enemy counter measures are depleted.
Only having one blackhawk is insane to me, I run like 4-5 and 1 chinook and just set up tiny supply depots every time I drop a team or two. Regardless, fantastic match.
You need to turn the radar on the pivads to intercept missiles but you'll need 2 for that many ballistic missiles lol
I feel like you held 2/3's of the map by yourslef while the other 4 players focused on the right side
I really they would add terrain deformation or at least some crater scaring on the map. One of the best things from WiC is after a long battle to see the before vs. after battlefield.
the pace of this game is awesome ! Ty for tthe conttent !
19:57 the dialogue of the vehicle at that moment was hilarious!
*team loses air superiority battle at outset
Vulcan: Yeah, gonna sell my AD now, don't need it
🤦
The amount of ballistic missiles been used is crazy.
I'm glad you enjoy this game, because I wouldn't want to play it but I'm interested enough to watch while I do something else. Sometimes, some really cool shit happens.
Other times, a Longbow struggles to destroy a single tank from a distance of
The missile spam is real.... I can smell the back blast from my 13M days...
GG i was the one you were facing.
I miss 'World In Conflict'. It's available at GOG, but isnt' playable on modern systems. It had beautiful environmental destruction and none of the build-decks-of-cards weirdness of modern RTS stuff. This feels similar, visually.
This is also the only one which bothers to include modern units. Not sure why so many decided to stagnate technological progression in the eighties.
Having technology from the 1980s makes allot of sense. In real history the threat of a real ww3 was the Soviets vs NATO, both were incredibly powerful. The Soviets were no joke, in technology or in military numbers. Once you get into the 1990s the USA was a global superpower unlike the world had seen for centuries. With the fall of the Soviet Union the United States was militarily superior to any other nations really up until today, with only Now China starting to compete. People want the 1980s because that's when a "fair" fight with a major superpower was a real possibility. The only other way to have that is going for a future scenario like 2030-2040 when China hypothetically could rival the US / NATO
@@-Zevin- It wouldn't have been a fair fight, no. It reached its military height during the seventies.
There's nothing wrong with having various different eras as options. I just don't understand why that's a forced limitation for many games now.
@@Xenomorphine The Soviets were very capable and rivaled and surpassed the US in many areas up until the late 1980s.
I'm just pointing out that the "forced limitation" is one based on reality. To have a exciting game you want a compelling conflict, WW2, a hypothetical cold war gone hot etc. Something with real stakes, with players involved who are powerhouses. It's the same reason a good boxing match involves the two best fighters going at it. Nobody gets excited watching a heavyweight world champion beat a 120 pound kid, and that's just what the situation was post 1990s. There is no compelling case for a real threat to the US or NATO at that time. The technology of 1990s and early 2000s stuff is cool, iconic firearms and technology, but there just isn't a conflict in that time frame that is high stakes.
Now on the original topic, I agree about world in conflict, loved it. So ahead of its time, I have lots of great memories playing that game, and calling in the airstrikes or tactical nuke was incredible.
I _LOVE_ the terrain in this game. WARNO/Wargame's engines seem to rely on really flat terrain, which gets boring after a while. This map looks like a genuine satellite scan, and has all the dynamic terrain that comes with it.
I agree this game already has better and more dynamic maps
But can’t get used to the playstyle of the game as it is now, I love playing Warno
I was playing with a friend and they said it looks like a Squad map in RTS scale
I love that you can fill up a transport with multiple types of units in this game, and then again the ballistic missile spam is ruining it for me currently, even though it looks rly cool ofc.
The M1150 is definitely cool, super nice little piece of indirect artillery.
Glad you went with the tube artillery but if you went with it even earlier then I think that would've been really helpful in hitting their Patriots and Counter-Battery. Obviously you were trying to hold on there and were pretty thin for some of that though.
25:45 bradley is just committing war crimes 😂
As long as you can prove that they had hostile intent, and I assume they weren't landing UN troops for negotiations, then you can shoot paratroopers. You cannot however shoot people that have ejected from aircraft and no longer present harm.
can you make a video about the current deck you use bc the one from 3 days ago changed and its hard to keep up haha. great video
Sort of think a light vehicle push was needed for this one.
I adore Broken Arrow, and a primary reason for this fondness is the missile system. The strategic combination of ballistic missile barrages and ground troops is extremely superb and very fun to watch, and I hope to see VulcanHDGaming utilize this tactic in future videos.
The missiles aystema are definitely the sellling point for this game to me as well, but currently it doesn’t work well with the other unit types imo, there is still heavy balancing to be done
What is the assault breacher tank for? Attacking infantry in buildings??
25:52 Those guys don't give a f* about the geneva convention 💀💀💀
i feel the range of the patriot missiles was drastically reduced... is that possible? In return, the range of the Russian AA like Antjev seems to be much higher
they need to limit the number of ballistic missile units you can own
Wish infantry stood more of a chance, just straight armored warfare from my experience
Infantry is definitely strong if you position them well, the point is they get annihilated by any type of missile or bomb, no chance. And it is all air ordnance spam all the time in this game…
@@GrumpBurger Just gotta keep them moving brother. Definitely easier in forested areas than in towns though!
Ehh, infantry is definitely more defensive but still important. What? Were you expecting Joe and Dimitry to take a 120mm Heat shell to the chest and not be turned to a red stain?
So far this game has been underwhelming unfortunately. Warno is definitely my preference still. But those Bradley’s kicked ass which surprised me coming from Warno where they fall flat in any armor engagement
Warno is dog shit
"Getting the longbow to work against the stinger teams is going to be tough"
Just about tells you all about how close to reality this game is.
Really? For some reason i always lose against helicopters…my stingers/shorad wont do shit agianst Enemy Apaches…tho when its the other way around, my Apache is gone in one second….
Even if a shorad Hits 2 missiles on an Helo, i do Like 1 Pixel of damage per rocket on direct Hits😢
I think the downed pilot act as a recon is underutilized right?
yep
Pilots don't have good enough optics for that unfortunately. The can cap though.
This game gives me strong "world in conflict" vibes
Does US or RU have the stronger roster currently?
Hey Vulcan, do you know if lasing a target increases hellfire range for the apache longbow?
Why do you not use cruise missiles?
Yes why? or more artillery even.
Seems like he doesn’t have a need for them💀
@VulcanHDGaming are harms interceptable with someling the the sosna?
Tried the game for a couple matches but the recon made zero sense to me. Warno recon can be annoying sometimes, but BA was 100x worse for me.
Yes and the poor LOS tool isn’t helping either
Whats the bottom for line of sight
@@JENdaBOMB Alt
@VulcanHDGaming tyty
Reminds me of World in Conflict
think this guy made a mistake trying to take out the stingers instead of just blasting the high rise towers. edit - lol a minute later he starts doing exactly that.
How does this compare with Warno or Wargame?
Depends on who you ask, I play Warno a lot and have played Wargame in the past. The biggest difference is the modern missile ordnance utilised in the game by artillery and air units. it hasn’t rly been implemented in an rts game similar to this before and it definitely feels off to me. The battlefield scale of BA also feels wrong if I compare it to Warno. It is also an early stage of the game and Warno has been released some time now.
compared to Warno, is it good?
Yup.
It’s fun for sure, but Warno is more developed and balanced in my experience as a rts game. Logically so maybe as BA is still in semi-early development. I hope they will make some changes to BA still.
Just played against a guy who tank swarmed, very skillfull
Can u show your build after match?
請問您的武器的詳細配置？
Hotkey for view radius
Alt
they should put the game in the store early access right now lol
Nah. I’ll wait for a proper release. Too many games come out needing more time in the oven and you can only make a good first impression once
@ as true as that is, it’s most definitely in a playable state and as long as you aren’t an idiot with your money a majority of early access games can release in much more advanced states than games that were just being developed under the cover
What a weird playstyle from the enemy team...
Very diplomatic way to say “garbage” 😂
It's the current meta, if the developers don't do something to fix the game.
@@tomfahey2823no its not. They lost
@@HIIIBEAR im kinda confused about this. Did they lose cause they played it bad or because of their strats?
@@JohnstyPonst spamming missiles costs too much pts/supply without using it more carefully. I laugh when i move my inf and see like three missiles hit an empty building.
4 s300 1 turn on problem solve like wise to ther other side 2 patriol 2lrsam 1?patriot on
Is this game PvP only?
Yesn't.
Currently it's manly PvP (1 pve scenario) but it will have a full campaign and solo/coop PvE possibilities.
Besides that it's Currently in public/open beta testing.
I’m sick of mirror matches
belt up
Much to like with this game, I don't think the maps looks good for most parts but the design seems good. But then there are stuff like ballistic missiles fired from units on the map, planes launching cruise missiles from well on the map and so on. It is just insanely silly and break the immersion completely. It is a bit sad but not every game are to your taste and that's ok, but I don't understand what they gain by not just having standoff missiles come as a off board support? It seems like a very odd choice to me but maybe I am missing something...
You can take out the supply dumps, sneak recon to kill the missile launchers, and use fighters to ambush heavy bombers. The range scaling lets you compress 200km+ of combat to a smaller map. It works really well once you get the hang of it. On small maps the missile launchers are a lot more vulnerable, especially the aircraft launching cruise missiles.
@@Alex-tc5kh So it is a question of game play balance, or maybe to give a sense of control? I get the idea then but it defeats the point of standoff weapons and makes range telescope depending on your point of view which just looks silly. But yes, I get the game play reason then. Thank you. :)
Incredible that you manage to spell armor wrong, despite it being 2024.
crazy game, take my money now, here 100$
Get ready for only mirror matches, Americans just have better tools/playstyle.
They have better long ranged weaponry including the Longbows and that’s absolutely dominating the game rn
Nah bro, ruskis all the way. Love to beat pussies who try to play meta decks without actually knowing what they're doing
Витязь с-350 с 12ю ракетами что такое ваше балистика 😂
You take too many looses... like the B1 you should never loose a B1, shoot from putside of AA ranges
Arty meta is so disgusting, when u have a teamatwe like that you have to cover the whole map alone and their arty don't do shit
They just spanw drones and stay in the spawn
Artillery is king of the battlefield. In BA the aim times are negligible so fire and adjust is just reflecting irl
@@SteelxWolf Yea but this is a game and ppl should not stay on their spawn and only use arty
@ what im saying is is the GAME reflects LIFE. You ever heard the saying art imitates life?
I dont really care if its a game. People have the freedom to do as they please. Low and behold people are using the strongest elements of the battlefield 🤷🏽
Its just an observation thats clearly happening
@@Yhon_sitoWhy not? Playing supportively with AA and arty is viable, it's a team game
I've been seeing people queue move their units a lot, I wonder how you're meant to do that.
Hold shift????
@SteelxWolf Lmao, I literally was seeing what holding shift would do and figured it out myself.
@ its a universal RTS button
anyone elses game keep freezing?
God, you let your infantry die again, you lack the support of armored units. Your infantry occupy buildings and are repeatedly hit by enemy long-range dynamic attacks, and you have no mobile units.
каким образом ты смог нормально поиграть? у меня все время падают сервера и сильнейшие фпс дропы
Cough cough, dc player
Man the voice lines are annoying, they talk sooo much and it's so cringy. It's like playing Command & Conquer in 2000, doesn't fit the theme of the game.
The recon on this game is shit i mean dudes can see me miles away behind things buts i can see nothing 20 feet away😂 and it seems im not the only one
It's just Global Hawk spam. Air recon is completely different than ground recon.
It’s drones my dude you can have them too
It’s called Line of Sight blockers. It don’t matter how good your binoculars are or if got thermal imaging in your tank optic. You can’t see through buildings
highly recommend removing the F-15EX from your decks. It's bugged or something and doesn't like firing it's missiles properly. You're way better off using the F-18C or spamming F-15C's. EX's are just great at wasting 800-1000 of your points in the beginning. Been using them since the closed beta and there's something definitely wrong with them
I felt like I had more success with the 15C than the EX, but just assumed it was a skill issue… I mean, it still could be, but this is still good to know.
My EX flew out of the map 😂 I laughed so hard wasting all them points. I'm not touching it until the next patch.
@@_TrueDesire_ flying out of the map is actually useful for orbiting around and then coming back and lobbing 5 JASSM from my F-15EX.
@Alex-tc5kh in my case it disappeared all together, the plane icon to the right also vanished.
@@_TrueDesire_ then u pressed B so it goes back or had no more fuel
A failed game unfortunately
1/10 rage bait
Bro ur game failed no girls L bozo moment
Games hella boring