Rolling Stone Magazine Is Terrible, And No One Should Read It
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024
- My reaction video to the Rolling Stone list of 200 greatest singers.
The Rolling Stone magazine love their ‘greatest’ lists, and their most recent one is their ‘200 greatest singers of all time’, published in January 2023’s edition. It has rather unsurprisingly generated a fair bit of controversy (and clicks!), and like a lot of people (and probably you), I’m not a massive fan. But maybe not for the reasons that you might expect! Check out my video reacting to the list!
#rollingstone #200greatestsingers
I think the rolling stone magazine is clueless about top 200. Barbra Striesand, Adele, Michael Jackson, Al Green, so many more that should be higher on the list. Who are they wanna be critics? What a joke!!
I just looked at the top 20 .. it's primarily a PC based/slanted list, no doubt.
Yeah I'm a very PC left wing voter and I find it ridiculous that the top 11 were African American . Sure they are all great singers but are they all better than Freddie Mercury ? NO .
Rolling Stone is to music what Rotten Tomatoes is to films. Pointless
Rolling stones magazine is crap.
Rolling Stones is just a bad magazine.
Agreed - but I had to drag that point out for as long as possible for my video ;)
Run by elite Ivy League alumni. Good grief. Fuck that
I have never really put stock in critics music or any media,admittedly that partly my personal bias as usually my taste doesn't coincide with theirs,and like most I do like it if they do happen to agree that's human I guess.
I didnt even read RS in the 70s when people stilI read magazines. I chose better magazines to read, like Mad Magazine.
Does anyone under 80 still read that crap? RS has been completely out of touch with the music scene for decades. Nothing but normie garbage.
I agree!
Even the top 10 NBA players of all time has Larry Bird but the RS top 10 is all African American .
Didn’t know the covered sports. They wouldn’t know shit about it anyway.
..i agreed with you
..its a big ❓❔❓why Michael Jackson was at #86,..when it's obviously Michael Jackson is way better (the greatest) than the #1 on their list..
No not number 1 but top 10.
Discontinue this publication...bad stories.
Rolling Stone sucks.