Rolling Stone Magazine Is Terrible, And No One Should Read It

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024
  • My reaction video to the Rolling Stone list of 200 greatest singers.
    The Rolling Stone magazine love their ‘greatest’ lists, and their most recent one is their ‘200 greatest singers of all time’, published in January 2023’s edition. It has rather unsurprisingly generated a fair bit of controversy (and clicks!), and like a lot of people (and probably you), I’m not a massive fan. But maybe not for the reasons that you might expect! Check out my video reacting to the list!
    #rollingstone #200greatestsingers

Комментарии • 20

  • @stepanieenos7444
    @stepanieenos7444 6 месяцев назад +4

    I think the rolling stone magazine is clueless about top 200. Barbra Striesand, Adele, Michael Jackson, Al Green, so many more that should be higher on the list. Who are they wanna be critics? What a joke!!

  • @coraltown1
    @coraltown1 10 месяцев назад +5

    I just looked at the top 20 .. it's primarily a PC based/slanted list, no doubt.

    • @drbosommd
      @drbosommd 6 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah I'm a very PC left wing voter and I find it ridiculous that the top 11 were African American . Sure they are all great singers but are they all better than Freddie Mercury ? NO .

  • @ritchieblackmore4880
    @ritchieblackmore4880 18 дней назад +2

    Rolling Stone is to music what Rotten Tomatoes is to films. Pointless

  • @Heckler22
    @Heckler22 2 месяца назад +3

    Rolling stones magazine is crap.

  • @VideogamesWorld93
    @VideogamesWorld93 3 месяца назад +3

    Rolling Stones is just a bad magazine.

    • @bigyellowpraxis
      @bigyellowpraxis  3 месяца назад

      Agreed - but I had to drag that point out for as long as possible for my video ;)

  • @PAUL-ge1kl
    @PAUL-ge1kl Месяц назад +1

    Run by elite Ivy League alumni. Good grief. Fuck that

  • @grooveyerbouti
    @grooveyerbouti Год назад +3

    I have never really put stock in critics music or any media,admittedly that partly my personal bias as usually my taste doesn't coincide with theirs,and like most I do like it if they do happen to agree that's human I guess.

  • @j.jester7821
    @j.jester7821 3 месяца назад +1

    I didnt even read RS in the 70s when people stilI read magazines. I chose better magazines to read, like Mad Magazine.

  • @Punkpsychobilly
    @Punkpsychobilly Месяц назад +2

    Does anyone under 80 still read that crap? RS has been completely out of touch with the music scene for decades. Nothing but normie garbage.

  • @drbosommd
    @drbosommd Год назад +2

    Even the top 10 NBA players of all time has Larry Bird but the RS top 10 is all African American .

    • @carpenoctem775
      @carpenoctem775 6 месяцев назад

      Didn’t know the covered sports. They wouldn’t know shit about it anyway.

  • @jhenuariehayes2715
    @jhenuariehayes2715 Год назад +3

    ..i agreed with you
    ..its a big ❓❔❓why Michael Jackson was at #86,..when it's obviously Michael Jackson is way better (the greatest) than the #1 on their list..

  • @4on6jazz
    @4on6jazz 25 дней назад

    Discontinue this publication...bad stories.

  • @shanemcconnell1736
    @shanemcconnell1736 Год назад +8

    Rolling Stone sucks.