Electronics Tutorial - The TL431 Part 1/3 - Getting to know the component`

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 янв 2025

Комментарии • 21

  • @rvamerongen
    @rvamerongen 3 года назад +5

    Great video, wish that there where more video’s like this series on the web. Thank you

  • @cellularmitosis2
    @cellularmitosis2 4 года назад +5

    Thanks so much for going in depth on this old part!

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  4 года назад +2

      Thank you! It may be an old component, but its still widely used.

  • @dbuezas
    @dbuezas 4 года назад +1

    Super informative video, thanks for creating this!

  • @mojtabajamal3457
    @mojtabajamal3457 2 года назад +1

    nice job as ever

  • @gjvdspam
    @gjvdspam 6 месяцев назад

    Hey, I'm not the only one using the box of washing machine soap:) Nice one, just what I need

  • @johnaweiss
    @johnaweiss 2 года назад

    5:02 By "open loop", do you mean, without feedback? Is the unity gain point the frequency limit of the part?
    Re noise, which part would be better for a lithium battery charger, OnSemi or TI?
    thx!

  • @shahzaibshamim6524
    @shahzaibshamim6524 5 лет назад +3

    will you do tutorial on ADC? I want to make one for my microcontroller project, my signal is between 1.5V and 3.5V but I want to utilize full adc range for each channel.

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  5 лет назад +4

      @Shahzaib Shamim Well, most modern Micro-controllers already have built in ADC's; the datasheet should offer information on this topic. What uC are you using?
      So I think what you need is a circuit that turns the 1.5-3.5V into the supply range of the uC so 0-5V or 0-3.3V (depending on what you are using). If the range is 0-5V you can simply use an op-amp circuit that amplifies by 2.5x and centered around 2.5V and that will convert the 1.5-3.5 directly to 0-5V.

  • @satd2024
    @satd2024 4 года назад

    Useful video thanks

  • @mariusb_ro
    @mariusb_ro 3 года назад

    Hi! I like your level of the information, is quite advanced what you present to us. Are you Romanian? your accent seems like you are :)

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  3 года назад

      I'm happy you are enjoying the videos! Da, sunt :D

    • @mariusb_ro
      @mariusb_ro 3 года назад

      @@FesZElectronics ești bun! bravo :)

  • @mrsc1914
    @mrsc1914 5 лет назад

    Quite a bold thing you're up to. How close do you think you'll get ? I never knew ltspice sims could get close to reality...

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  5 лет назад +1

      Well, we'll see next week how close I get.
      But regarding simulation accuracy in general, its all about how complex and well made the model is and how well you include all the parameters of the circuit (the parasitics that are normally ignored). The simulation can be fast or accurate. The more accuracy, the slower it will work. I will try to find a balance between the 2.

    • @mrsc1914
      @mrsc1914 5 лет назад

      @@FesZElectronics Lately i've been wondering if the discrepancies are more about our math having gaps. However, it could totally be as you say, that the sim just needs to be more accurate. with the mag amp thing I found that when multiple signals get in the same place it gets hairy. Which in turn has me thinking about filters and Fourier representation. The way a cap reacts to multiple signals could be a particular function. Additive / subtractive synthesis?? in a sense it's acting like a mixer, but in the gilbert cell(which does not have reactive components) the way which the signals interact is clearly chosen/understood. Physical objects/signal paths may also exhibit similar behavior, but the transfer functions may not be as clear. Hope that made any sense, lol . I've been seeking a way to model this so I can share the anomaly with others so we can all think on it together. Maybe, its just something I haven't learned yet :)

  • @reynolds087
    @reynolds087 3 года назад

    Could you share the files for your custom TL431 model? Would be nice to have your verified version if possible.

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  3 года назад +2

      I added a link in the description of Part2.

    • @reynolds087
      @reynolds087 3 года назад

      @@FesZElectronics Awesome; thank you!

  • @incxxxx
    @incxxxx 5 лет назад +1

    Very interesting! But still I do not understand what are you doing. What these strange circuits should show?

    • @FesZElectronics
      @FesZElectronics  5 лет назад

      I'm not sure I understand. What exactly should I clarify?