Hollie Davidson steps up to make HUGE decision after referee set back!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 ноя 2024
  • As we countdown to the Rugby World Cup 2021, we reflect on the process that decides who will officiate the World Cup final! In this week's episode we look at Hollie Davidson's history making fixture as an all female team officiated a tier 1 nation (Portugal v Italy) for the first time. It wasn't to be a walk in the park either as a last minute penalty try decided the Fixture in Portugal.
    #Rugby #Referee #Highlights #WorldCup
    SUBSCRIBE to World Rugby on RUclips: @World Rugby
    Abonnez-vous à World Rugby France:
    / @rugbypassfr
    ワールドラグビー日本のチャンネル登録をお願いします:
    / @rugbyworldcupjp
    For news, stories, highlights and more, go to our official website: www.world.rugby/
    Follow World Rugby on social media:
    RUclips: @World Rugby
    Facebook: / worldrugby
    Twitter: / worldrugby
    Instagram: / worldrugby
    To LICENSE World Rugby footage, please contact IMG REPLAY ➡️ bit.ly/2yYNlIF

Комментарии • 16

  • @WorldRugby
    @WorldRugby  2 года назад +2

    Who are you most looking forward to seeing in the 2022 Rugby World Cup? Let us know in the comments!

  • @gibbodub247
    @gibbodub247 2 года назад +4

    Quality! That last call was huge. Big for anyone of any experience. Very well done and great to see!

  • @chiefhb01
    @chiefhb01 2 года назад +3

    i would like Nigels Call on whistle watch… good refereeing

  • @Mumbo_Jumbo_Kiwi.1
    @Mumbo_Jumbo_Kiwi.1 Год назад

    I hope she's primed for the RWC. Fantastic referee.

  • @clarke1319
    @clarke1319 2 года назад +2

    Question I would raise if I was sitting in a WR Referees meeting.
    There appears to be a different mindset to penalty tries awarded from scrums and/or mauls as opposed to penalty tries awarded from open play. Generally the TMO protocols are used to decide penalty tries from open play however not from scrum or maul where almost always the referee decides immediately.
    Why is this?
    If you look at the two penalty tries awarded in the Portugal v Italy match, the first one, from the high tackle, was decided after the review however the one at the end of the match, from the maul , was decided by the referee immediately.

    • @neill392
      @neill392 2 года назад +4

      I suspect there is a difference.
      The high tackle has a clear protocol, point of contact, mitigation etc, the penalty try, would a try probably have been scored etc. With the collapsed driving maul, it's simply a case of are they driving forwards close to the line and did someone drag it down.

  • @silmarienprince3137
    @silmarienprince3137 2 года назад +5

    Refrees don't have it easy. 😕 Good onya

  • @TheFurreid
    @TheFurreid 2 года назад +2

    wow! great decision..

  • @eddieosullivan6083
    @eddieosullivan6083 Год назад

    Excellent decision on penalty try, clear to see the maul was collapsed deliberately - hand out for advantage no advantage then give the penalty try good call, but I dont think advantage is the correct way here but all in all decision was correct - current referee rugby

  • @jc238
    @jc238 2 года назад

    Terrible referee. New Zealand deliberatel dropped the English driving maul in the last minute of the World Cup final. Second time should have been a penalty try but she bottled it.