that makes the most sense, everyone has a tiny whoop, just need this cool stack holder for the O3, please make it available for us non-3d-printer folks to purchse it from u!
the tiny whoop must be powerful enough to carry it as it will become quite heavy with the o3 unit. i dont sell any physical products but newbeedrone already asked for the files and maybe they will offer it ready to use for purchase. i wonder, arent there others already selling this kind of o3 cage? for the 3d print folks i have made the files available on my patreon: www.patreon.com/posts/dji-o3-air-unit-101111762
Even though I may not be upgrading to an HD fpv anytime soon, I enjoyed watching your precision engineering work to create this cage for the O3 unit in a tiny drone. Brilliant job.
Hmm, I had the pavo pico as my first drone, but it's really no fun with the full O3 on such a size, even if this is a little larger I doubt it. Stripping the O3 naked makes such a huge difference for small drones.
it really is only for doing like cinematic footage and some soft dynamic flying. to heavy for crazy freestyle. stripping the o3 to reduce weight would def be noticeable and improving the flight characteristics.
Very nice, extremely handy having a 3D printer when your a modeller. I also 3D print a lot of my own parts to customise my own models and make electronics fit nicely. What is you preferred printer and slicer ?
Thank you for designing this. I’m not concerned about rough landing anymore. I did couple this canopy with my naked O3 and it flys great btw. Thanks again
Amazing work 😎 Ive been designing stuff like this too for drones. What material did you use to print? I imagine typical PLA might melt and warp with the heat that the 03 can let off
@@quadmovr got ya! I was also thinking PC would be a good material! Would love to see the final build and flight footage 😎 again amazing work! I know exactly what goes into doing this kind of thing so I’m extra respectful
printed in PLA. it is only a test print to see if the dimensions are fitting etc but i couldnt help and make a video. i want to try different materials for the final use. first of all PC.
@@quadmovr I heard, PC can be very brittle. But didn't try it yet. I use eSun PLA+ for drone frames. Impact resistence is much better than regular PLA or PETG. Next I want to try ASA, because it's lighter and should still have good impact resistence. PP could be also great (for impact and light weight), but might be too soft.
@@uhu4677 ive used PC for a screw driver handle and i wasnt able to break it, even with a hammer. but that use case wasnt involving fine parts. PETG is def not good as it just shatters on an impact. also heard good things about ASA and wanted to try it in general some time. PP is a nightmare to print, especially because of the extremely bad bed adhesion.
@@quadmovr Very true. But you might have success with that closed printer. For bed adhesion Magigoo PP worked for me. However I am a bit concerned about the Warning sign on it. Which PC did you use? I heard good things about Polymax PC. It might be less brittle than other PC filaments.
i doubt that it has the exact same dimensions. but the design is adjustable to whatever vtx unit. once i have a moonlight at hand, i can adjust the design.
havnt printed that much with it yet. but my impressions so far: it has a similar printing core and performance (print speed, result) of a bambulab x1 but at the lower price tag you dont get the premium feel, user amenities (ams system, different print beds, automated filament change, ui, soft/hardware integration, etc.) or the thoughtful design of a bambulabs printer. will see how the use feels once its integrated in bambu studio. which is about to happen.
that makes the most sense, everyone has a tiny whoop, just need this cool stack holder for the O3, please make it available for us non-3d-printer folks to purchse it from u!
the tiny whoop must be powerful enough to carry it as it will become quite heavy with the o3 unit. i dont sell any physical products but newbeedrone already asked for the files and maybe they will offer it ready to use for purchase. i wonder, arent there others already selling this kind of o3 cage? for the 3d print folks i have made the files available on my patreon: www.patreon.com/posts/dji-o3-air-unit-101111762
Didn’t Happymodel make one (for the mob 8) last year
@@funknunkl they made an o3 whoop but the 'cage' is proprietary and not fitting the 25.5x25.5mm standard.
Amazing build! Can't wait for the flight footage :)
All the best and happy flying!
havnt flown it much yet but once i have nice footage to show ill share it for sure. here and/or on instagram.
Even though I may not be upgrading to an HD fpv anytime soon, I enjoyed watching your precision engineering work to create this cage for the O3 unit in a tiny drone. Brilliant job.
Very neat. Look forward to seeing it fly with some footage.
Love that stitch!!
That's so cool!!
Very good! 👍
how does it fly?
Hmm, I had the pavo pico as my first drone, but it's really no fun with the full O3 on such a size, even if this is a little larger I doubt it. Stripping the O3 naked makes such a huge difference for small drones.
it really is only for doing like cinematic footage and some soft dynamic flying. to heavy for crazy freestyle. stripping the o3 to reduce weight would def be noticeable and improving the flight characteristics.
Awesome 😎👍🏿
Good video bro.
Very nice, extremely handy having a 3D printer when your a modeller. I also 3D print a lot of my own parts to customise my own models and make electronics fit nicely. What is you preferred printer and slicer ?
indeed. many things i create and do would not be possible without a 3d printer. my fav and most used is the bambu x1c and bambustudio.
Im so glad that you made this. newbee drones canopy is so fragile it was pissing me off how many I've bought. can you try this with a naked version?
mine broke too. hence i wanted to try a custom design and other materials. i dont own a naked o3.
Thank you for designing this. I’m not concerned about rough landing anymore. I did couple this canopy with my naked O3 and it flys great btw. Thanks again
Cooles Projekt, ich hoff du bringst den kleinen zum "Käferfliegen" mit. Gruß Rolf
danke. wenn es klappt und ich komme, bring ich ihn natürlich mit 🙂
Amazing work 😎 Ive been designing stuff like this too for drones. What material did you use to print? I imagine typical PLA might melt and warp with the heat that the 03 can let off
shown in the video is a pla print i used for validating the dimensions. will try PC for the final part.
@@quadmovr got ya! I was also thinking PC would be a good material! Would love to see the final build and flight footage 😎 again amazing work! I know exactly what goes into doing this kind of thing so I’m extra respectful
will post pictures of the final build on insta 👍🏻
😍where to buy？
what?
does it fly? looks very heavy
it does. hovers at 60% throttle.
👽
75% throttle to get it off the ground tho
60% for hovering with a charged 2s550.
@@quadmovr with how hard you fly them that's about 75-90 second flight time ;o)
i get around 3:30min indoor. very soft flying. havnt done an outdoor los flight yet but it will surely be not much flight time doing acro stuff.
Great video. Did you print your o3 cage in TPU or PLA?
sounded like pla
printed in PLA. it is only a test print to see if the dimensions are fitting etc but i couldnt help and make a video. i want to try different materials for the final use. first of all PC.
@@quadmovr I heard, PC can be very brittle. But didn't try it yet.
I use eSun PLA+ for drone frames. Impact resistence is much better than regular PLA or PETG.
Next I want to try ASA, because it's lighter and should still have good impact resistence. PP could be also great (for impact and light weight), but might be too soft.
@@uhu4677 ive used PC for a screw driver handle and i wasnt able to break it, even with a hammer. but that use case wasnt involving fine parts. PETG is def not good as it just shatters on an impact. also heard good things about ASA and wanted to try it in general some time. PP is a nightmare to print, especially because of the extremely bad bed adhesion.
@@quadmovr Very true. But you might have success with that closed printer.
For bed adhesion Magigoo PP worked for me. However I am a bit concerned about the Warning sign on it.
Which PC did you use?
I heard good things about Polymax PC.
It might be less brittle than other PC filaments.
A naked 03 would be an option. That full-size unit needs 3" props
guess you didn't see Mobula 8 with O3.
a naked o3 would def be noticeable and improving the flight characteristics.
@@T418RC 03 is too heavy for whoops. Naked ultra 03 is 18 grams with camera and vtx. The only thing that makes sense is a 3" toothpick build
has to be under 38 grams with no camera and no video transmitter
Is it necessary to cross the antenna ?
no. i just did it to make it as compact as possible and it also holds the o3 cables in place.
No, but a V shape will perform better than running them parallel
Will it fit moonlight?
i doubt that it has the exact same dimensions. but the design is adjustable to whatever vtx unit. once i have a moonlight at hand, i can adjust the design.
Q1 job eh? Thoughts so far?
havnt printed that much with it yet. but my impressions so far: it has a similar printing core and performance (print speed, result) of a bambulab x1 but at the lower price tag you dont get the premium feel, user amenities (ams system, different print beds, automated filament change, ui, soft/hardware integration, etc.) or the thoughtful design of a bambulabs printer. will see how the use feels once its integrated in bambu studio. which is about to happen.
@@quadmovr copy that!! thanks!!
So clean you can do surgery on.