Just wondering - is there a big reason to persevere with Flux if it is more difficult to work with i.e. Ipadapter & controlnet limitations and need for high denoise
Flux has better image quality, coherence and prompt understanding. I can still use SDXL for any of the stages which require IPAdapter or controlnets. Flux has come a long way since its release, with the new loras it is easily the best all round model we have.
@@robadams2451 thanks for the explanation. Keep up the great work and thanks for sharing your gems of knowledge in such a clear, methodical & artistic manner.
Just wondering - is there a big reason to persevere with Flux if it is more difficult to work with i.e. Ipadapter & controlnet limitations and need for high denoise
Flux has better image quality, coherence and prompt understanding. I can still use SDXL for any of the stages which require IPAdapter or controlnets. Flux has come a long way since its release, with the new loras it is easily the best all round model we have.
@@robadams2451 thanks for the explanation. Keep up the great work and thanks for sharing your gems of knowledge in such a clear, methodical & artistic manner.