The Blockchain & Bitcoin - Computerphile
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
- Blockchain is the underlying technology behind cryptocurrencies bringing together Merkle trees, Hashing & Distributed Architecture. Christopher Ellis explains.
Note1 - At 6:46 when Chris is drawing the Merkle Tree, C would actually be duplicated and hashed with itself not with B. So you would get H(C - C) instead of H(B - C).
Note2 - At minute 17, Christopher mentioned the mining reward halving at 21,000 bitcoins but meant 210,000 blocks.
Public Key Encryption: • Public Key Cryptograph...
The Perfect Code: • The Perfect Code - Com...
/ computerphile
/ computer_phile
This video was filmed and edited by Sean Riley.
Computer Science at the University of Nottingham: bit.ly/nottscom...
Computerphile is a sister project to Brady Haran's Numberphile. More at www.bradyharan.com
This is the best block chain 101 video I've seen. Most often people explaining it don't sound like they understand what they're endeavoring to describe.
Ah yes. Pretty sure those are investors and speculators mate. Ask them about blockchain and they'll goes: 'Sorry I have a meeting'
It's interesting that the people criticising this guy's pronunciation can't post simple comment using correct spelling and grammar.
Great video. I learned more in five minutes of this description than in a couple of hours worth of other videos.
This guy is brilliant. Finally someone who explained so clear with good enough knowledge but accessible for anyone who is not in the world of cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies.
I salute a fellow stereotypical nerd
i salute someone who doesn't like pi
Tau is at about 2 times more awesome than pi.
Finally numerical value doesn't pose any restrictions on coolness (for mathematical constants).
Remarks: Tau=2Pi=circumference/radius Pi=circumference/diameter radius=1/2diameter.
This dude is a *baller*.
No, he's an engineer
Best, most technically understandable explanation of the blockchain that I have ever heard.
ikr
Coincurrrr
I think 3blue1brown may have just made a better one.
Virtue signalling.
@@175griffin More graphics I agree. This one explains better the hashing, Merkal tree and what miners are actually responsible for. Both videos together are unbeatable. I finally get it. Like when trying to under RSA encryption scheme you just keep researching until you finally get it. The information age I love it.
Omg, you have no idea how useful this video is and how perfectly timed it is. I am applying for an apprenticeship at IBM and I researched Blockchain as it is one of their big things at the moment. This is exactly what I needed to learn further about it. THANK YOU!
Yeah, they seem to have many open positions in that field atm.
The Hyperledger Intership program?
Nice try, IBM
Daniel Hammond IBM is involved with bitcoin?
Not exactly Bitcoin, but blockchain technology AFAIK.
Out of all the vague explanations about blockchains and cryptocurrencies available out there.. this is the best I have seen and most technically explained, and in a very short time.
Guys, why are you so mean? This man tells interesting stuff, he is definitely cool guy, why do you care so much about how he pronounces "s"?
This is the beauty of RUclips. TV will only hire robots as presenters... and they will lie about bitcoin. This man has got the knowledge and he can just put it out there. BTW, I found his delivery to be clear.
because many funny comrade
really pathetic comment
He looks so nervous I want to give him a hug. Perfectly explained though
Yeah, talk about that, this triggers a protection mechanism deep down in me somehow, like a duck family crossing a dangerous street. He doesn't have to be nervous though, apart from the somewhat rare way of pronouncing sharp sounds ,). No, really, he seems to be quite able to explain things; definately one of the better... umm... 'explain-guys' on computerphile!
It's really hard to explain something you have understood on a very deep layer on a much more common layer. You have to double-check if your listener can still follow you and jet your simplification does not lead to miss information. That's especially hard in math and IT wheres nothing really in your hands that can be checked against your knowledge.
This is the hardest Computerphile video to watch while eating cereal
L Ramsden literally doing that right now lol
You mean shereal?
thatsh what he shaid!
I am eating cereal and watching this video as well
Maybe I'm just spoiled by listening to people who're comfortable in front of a mic. Helpful information shouldn't be cut off by our aesthetic standards
Thanks for /finally/ taking the time to make a in-depth video about Bitcoin/Blockchain on Computerphile!
This video actually explained it to me. thank you. many podcasts and blogs have failed, but the whole public private key explanation made it click! thanks
This is by far the best explanation of the system that I have heard yet. The ending of the video was rather sobering however. An hour or more to have a verified transaction is way too long for much of the world's trading, especially when we still have to pay a fee for the transaction.
I feel this would have been easier to understand if they had gone over version control system before this
I'm not sure how, exactly. True, some version control systems (e.g. Git, Mercurial, Bazaar) use hashes to identify and authenticate their commits, among other things, but I think the same explanation of "hashing is the process of mapping an input to a unique and immutable output code" could've been used there too. They're just two independent concepts that happen to rely on the same underlying and independent technology of crypto-hashes.
ray They are not independent concept. a block chain is just a version control with prof of work. Every time someone write in block chain is like making a commit in git.
git commits include the hash for its parent commits. That's a has chain.
The only difference with the bitcoin ledger is that it's hard to make blocks.
I have seen multiple simplified explanations of bit coins, the block chain and, mining and never understood it. Thank you Computerphile!
The block reward is halved every 210,000 blocks (about 4 years), not every 21,000 bitcoins.
nyx211 check description ;)
heh. whoops.
if you did it by bitcoins it would be nonconvergent
Best video on Blockchain technology on youtube !! Kudos to the explainer
This guy is incredibly brilliant! I bet he gets lots of pushy
He pjobably drownsj in pushy
I think his speech impediment makes him better at explaining ideas. He is probably focused less on using big words to appear brilliant and just wants to help you understand what he’s talking about. It’s also a sign that he truly understands what he’s talking about.
I didn't really notice a speech impediment. I *DID* notice he is really, really knowledgeable.
OMG hadn't seen dot matrix paper in more than 15 years, nearly cried :)
I last seen in 2013
well, that takes courage. Lets hope internet will be nice to you.
Hmm, what is your commend about?
His speech.
AndrejCibikDesign I watched the whole video just because of his voice. It's actually really quite nice to listen to.
i think and hope that these videos are watched by fairly intelligent people ....
not sure if you're giving a backhanded compliment but this video is fine... I care more for the content than to be worried about how he sounds..which is fine anyway
for anyone interesed in learning more about bitcoin the princeton course available in youtube is very well done
Nice description of proof-of-work.
Still mining 12.5btc per block till 2020. Much love to all involved in doing this vids!
I'm glad you guys managed to talk about "the blockchain" in 2017 by mentioning only bitcoin and leaving out ponzi schemes fraudulent securities and vaporware projects. However, despite the superficial overview about mining, one cannot talk about bitcoin and immutability without a more in-depth explanation about proof-of-work and how the process of burning energy is key to achieve that immutability and secure the network.
Each block is 12.5 Bitcoins right now, not 6.
His Divine Shadow I thought bitcoins were worth like $100... are miners really making $1250 per block, or did the value go down or what
time traveler confirmed
kiefac They make $12,000 for every block
It is almost impossible to find a block on your own though.
A bitcoin is almost $1000 right now.
12:30 The txs on a fork chain are not "out of luck" or illegitimate(the block is orphaned or illegitimate the txs aren't), they simply go back into the mempool and get added to the next block on the valid chain. The end user isn't effected and he will get confirmations like normal.
Just what skynet needs. First, a distributed internet now a distributed currency.
His shirt is killing the antialias when you play it in a small window
I already understood the components of this, but a clear brain-to-mouth presentation made it make sense (fully-ish). Thanks.
11:23 - Basically, if you mine a block but it ends up on the shorter chain, then you lose your block reward!
nyx of course ... orphaned blocks are just part of the function, and a known unknown.
Holy moly, I have watched many explanations on blockchain and this is the first one that made me go "Aha!". Thank you!
This is a MUCH better explanation of blockchain technology than his video on Smart Contracts.
This is a bit focused on crypto coins like Bitcoin used as cash. I recommend discussing blockchain tech for distributed computing, for instance, Ethereum.
I always thought that 'nonce value' meant the number of people in the Tory cabinet. Thanks for clearing that up!
We would be friends irl
so many questions...who decides or sets the policy over how long the miners should take on average to decrypt the key? dont these people hold a lot of power over the bitcoin market? also, what if there arent enough miners around? then the transactions would take ages to validate, unless the keys are made easier to decrypt (which would mean constant adjustment of their difficulties?)?
Great video! Keep them coming! Just please pay attention: When looking for the merkle root C is duplicated and hashed with itself to get hash(C,C). It won't be hashed together with B!
Man this video solved my puzzle to understand blockchain you deserve a heart coin ❤.
This guys is very good at explaining the system Good job!
I like to use blockchain and this video was cool but I am now more confused about how the system works
I totally love that you write on a perforated computer paper.
kripkee from big bang is here boys and girls. very well explained
He has the cutest S´s i have ever heard.
He is the retired voice actor of Homestar Runner.
Great joooeaeoooeeaeaeeooooeoaeaeaooorb!
That is called a speech impediment. It's not cute, and takes years of training to get rid of.
I dont think hes even trying :P :D
He is having a laugh of us all yeah? Someone skilled in math, but can't even pronounce the simplest of sounds?
Would someone be so nice and add subtitles? I'm really interested in what he has to say, but I stand the way he talks.
Bitcoin is going through a turbulent time right now as miners can't currently achieve consensus on how Bitcoin should scale to increase .capacity for more transaction volume.
There is always tons of Drama in bitcoin and will continue to be for some time period.... yes
BU
Doesn't this mean that the block-chain will become (close to) "infinitely" large eventually?
I mean (eventually) 21 million bitcoins times whatever huge amount of transactions each day equals an enormously large block-chain?
Even though it's only text, eventually not even NSA + GOOGLES + whatever, size of server is not going to be big enough to hold all this text?
There are different types of full nodes, pruned full nodes are less than 5GB and can still 100 Validate all txs, Archival full nodes do indeed store the full blockchain ~105GB in size for all txs going back to 2009 , in the future we may end up sharding these archival nodes but as of right now they aren't too big.
there are other blockchains besides bitcoin. One of the solutions to scaling is sharding the network.
So how does the value in USD come about?
it was a nice talk, from which i learned something. but it could use some more emphasis on practical details of:
- how the concepts tie together
- maybe just a tiny bit more about how public and private keys are normally used
- could also mention that the sender chooses the transaction fee
More on this topic please! And please talk about other implementations of the blockchain too. But Bitcoin is inherently interesting ofc.
i watched the Video a 2nd time, the first time i was really impressed of such a cute pronouncing. But then i want to really know something about the Blockchain. And wow! by far the best technical Explanation of Blockchain here on RUclips.
Could be a bit more Graphical, but it is to 95% top! :D
Nice work and keep up, i saw you made already an 2nd Video. Nice! i respect you a lot.
will have a watch one more time cause it's high level for me! Thanks!
I personally apologize for all the apes making fun of your speech impediment, sir! I think it's adorable and doesn't make you difficult to understand at all
I actually like his voice. Would like him to explain more things
After many years I finally understand Bitcoin. Kinda. Thank you so much! :)
Point of clarification in Bitcoin. It isn't the longest chain that defines bitcoin but the "Most worked VALID chain" that defines it. Bitcoin testnet and many alts have longer chains. Economic nodes define what is valid or not through consensus and the most worked is the combination of the cumulative weight on a chain of PoW (Proof of work)
Best explanation I've seen thus far. Fantastic video. -Cheers
i really like this subject, but i just realized i know very little about it...
Very useful and detailed video!
Still a little confused about the nonce hash. Is the purpose simply to increase the computing difficulty of the blockchain creation?
Yes, in order to keep the block generation time at ~10 min.
I've been interested in and owned bitcoin for a while, but there's still one thing I don't understand. If the blockchain records every transaction ever made, won't it become arbitrarily large over time, until it becomes unmanageable for computers?
Yepp, that is an issue, and it's why we have a limit on transaction speed. We could just make blocks twice as fast or twice as large and thus have twice the transaction speeds, but that would mean it grows in size twice as fast.
As time passes, harddrive space increases, so hopefully it'll keep up. Or we'll find some awesome new way to deal with this problem.
Some cyptocurrencies (and even some bitcoin "tools"?) solve this by making it possible to not have all of the blockchain downloaded. This of course has the problem of making the currency less decentralized, and also "hiding" some of the information, even if you're obviously allowed to download the whole things.
I think I understood about 1% of this talk, but it was really interesting! I need to watch it again...
Wanna see my block chain?
Panties hit the floor
How about a video on ethereum now?
Its like a database to which you can only insert and read... you cannot tamper with existing records.
It's more like the transaction log of a database.
There's no record of the current balance of each account but you can compute it from all the transactions in and out of the account you're looking at.
Append and read, and appending has to be done according to the proof-of-work algorithm.
This is a very brave man.
amazing explanation, thank u very much
brilliant video and well explained.
Just a quick comment on block halving. Current block reward is 12.5 and when it all started for BTC it was 50 BTC. Next year in April or May I think it will be half so 6.25 BTC then 3.125 BTC then 1.5625 BTC then 78.125 Million Satoshi then 39.062 Million Satoshi so on and so forth, that means it will take almost more than 7-10 decades to mine all coins. By then, I reckon it will evolve into something unknown.
Excellent explanation of block chain. Thanks a lot!
So the actual bitcoins are actually just the result of the transactions? Not even an actual binary number? I guess the transactions are signed with the iniatiator's private key. Is that correct?
The bitcoins are merely the unspent outputs left in an address that originated originally from a coinbase mined. The private key allow you to transact or sign those outputs
Great work !
Is it necessarily the longest chain that wins? Couldn't I just create a longer chain in isolation on a reduced difficulty and then broadcast that chain to the network?
very smart in explaining the process I loved it
Great video, would like to see more detail in the future about the network side of things behind this, like keeping track of transactions which were lost in a forked chain etc.
In a forked chain, both forks probably have all of the same transactions on them long before either side is dropped.
wow. in depth and great explanation. Thank you!
5:50 when transactions are published in the network, it's existing out there in the ether. No pun intended.
Great video. Hope to see you in more Computerphile videos!
really well done!
This person doesn't 'live and breath' block chains. This person is academic who studies the phenomenon. The interviewer failed here, not the interviewed.
wait, the comments are nice??? what happened?
makes me proud :)
And why wouldn't they be?
@@tomr6955 because he talks funny
Nerds are nice. Nerds understand that in order to learn and be efficient with each other you need to overlook someone's inabilities to bring out their full potential.
So distributed is not decentralized? Well explained video!
And while Bitcoin was intended and developed to be distributed, mining pools and asics have effectively made it decentralized.
I can't understand what he's trying to say. No subtitles?
put 720p damn... HD analysis too high
I like to think of a Bitcoin wallet as owning the private key which corresponds to the transaction history on the distributed Bitcoin blockchain ledger of the coins held within it.
....since you own the transaction history of the coins you 'own', you can therefore alter the transaction state or 'spend' the coins within the wallet that you own the transaction history of.
Brilliant. I think I finally get (some of) it. Thanks.
Regarding this fork thing... If one network is big enough and favors the blocks computed by their own miners, couldn't this be exploited to first create a huge chain before making that one public?
To outdo all other networks working on the blocks in question and "monopolize" the whole mining business?
Miners are incentivized to publish their blocks as quickly as possible to ensure they are accepted by the network. The longer they wait to publish their blocks, the higher the risk of all the other miners publishing their mined blocks (and take the reward for each block).
Can you make a new video explaining SegWit (and maybe the Lightning Network)?
WTF. I just started reading about this yesterday. I even visited blockchain.info! Right on time guys👍👍
Look up how the banks , Feds, IBM etc have invested in Blockchain .
Look up IBM Hyperledger
Johmathan ok i did. what about it?
Askhay stated just started, along with right on time.
I believe it started in 2009 or 2010.
That's all.
Akshay It's called the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon (when you learn about something and then right after you suddenly start to see it being discussed or used in contexts you wouldn't have before). It happens to me all the time! Always feels eerie too, even tho it's just a cognitive bias
But yea. Boring lil piece of trivia for ya there
Please do video on Monero
The technology gets smarter and smarter but we've been using the same, sprocket-holed, line-printer paper for over 40 years.
Why is the puzzle where the miner varies the nonce value to eventually meet the hash criteria made to be so difficult?
Is it to provide enough delay time for some process to prevent the same transaction getting grouped into two different blocks or something?
Or just to slow down the mining process? I don't get it
The idea is to target 1 block roughly every 10 mins - gives enough time to ensure the block is propagated the world over and to give ample time to all miners to have a chance to fairly solve the next one. If blocks are being made faster than every 10 mins (on average), the difficulty is algorithmically increased (and lowered if blocks are being made too slowly).
Video is muted?
At that point in the future when miners are only rewarded for transaction fees, can miners decide to not incorporate transactions from the "ether" into their block if the transaction fee is too low or zero? Will that mean that, essentially, zero-fee transactions may have to wait longer until they are eventually confirmed into a block by a miner who does accept free transactions?
"can miners decide to not incorporate transactions from the "ether" into their block if the transaction fee is too low or zero?"
This already is occurring. Without a tx fee the tx will likely never get included in a block. Offchain txs dont need fees though.
Zero fee txs will only exist for payment channels and offchain.
Thanks learnt a lot from this
There have been estimations about total power consumption of crypto-currency servers, miners, exchanges and cracking/manipulation attempts. The total electrical energy used far exceeds the net worth of, say, Bitcoin. Thoughts?
Awesome video! Thanks!
Can someone tell me, in video description that mention about Note1, why the C is hashing to itself, not with B?
couldn't follow along from the block part :(
thanks for this great explanation.
Although they did not use the term blockchain, there existed software that proceeded Bitcoin that uses blockchains. One prominent example is git, and it's not a coincidence that it's also a distributed decentralised system.
Gary van der Merwe Git uses a merkle tree. While very similar, I believe a blockchain is a merkle tree that also includes a consensus protocol.