Time will tell... Question is : is there really a demand for more that many blockchains? My guess is NO, if there was adoption would be full send by now if it was. Its all running on eth and its L2s really. Other chains are mostly staking nfts empty traffic. So. E company's pick avalanche but most want run on centralized blockcheis as it is company and cant put faith of their business on some random validators. I closly follow developments but so far nothing really promising other than community fomo and hype. Any company thinking about blovkchain is better off to develop its own centralized and runing for purpose they build. Decentralization isnt for companys and institutions. And thats where real money are.
@@lurker668 i have the same thoughts like you. There is no need for so much layer1 projects therefore it is better to look at different spaces for example Internet of things and in this case IOTA it has enourmos potential beacuse it is a really different area with a lot of use case for everyday people
What I like from this video is the main goal: neutral speaking /analysis. I like the idea of you talking about other projects outside Cosmos. That gives you also a broader visión and tbh, it is refreshing. 😉👍
Great overview - I agree all three projects have a lot of promise and offer interoperability. Are Cosmo and Dot able to setup regulatory compliant chains? I know AVAX is focused on public and private subnets wondering how the others are approaching this?
So for now polkadot has more stuff driving up the price for the token but soon cosmos will have the same? Will it be a big narrative to even use this parachains? Im noob sry
dot staking info wrong too. They have dashboard now, and "Pools" minimum is very low (may be 5-20 dot, i don't remember) and depends of Pool's terms! but it's NOT min=80.
@@cryptocito Formaly you are right ) but users who want just to stake and get rewards - don't care about formals (by the way KSM min for pool around 0.02).
Dot is slow, energy inefficient, the ui is terrible and not user friendly, parachains are expensive and often price projects out. In terms on layer 0 atom destroys dot.
@@lordPix3lUKcosmos moving to shared security now? Canary network? All the things cosmos guys have been bashing for years then they go and follow. Mate it's behind in thinking. Gavin Wood thought about all of this. Polkadot has been setup this way because of decentralization. Both will work together. But building on substrate was key by polkadot.
ICS will be an option, not mandatory, right? So the question is, except the newer & smaller projects, why would projects use it instead of their network of validators and increasing the value of their token?
It's not mandatory at all. Setting up a validator set is super difficult. You need to pitch them, build your own val infra, coordinate upgrades, somehow ensure decentralization and so on. Renting Cosmos Hub security means that new projects can go to market much faster and skip the hassle of doing the above
@@cryptocito Sure, would be much faster, but that would decrease the value of their token, which they would need to raise funds to rent the shared security. So I see the value of that, but not sure it's a killer application. I assume would be mostly like a launchpad ?
The only true Layer 0 in crypto wins 💪😎. I'll pass on the Layer 2 with nightmare tokenomics. Small bag of Wavax for an Osmo or Kuji pool 👍. The Amazon partnership will have retail casuals pumping in...good future daytrade
All these are good, but I see one stand out and that is Polkadot because of it's shared security. It also has the most developers and labels it self a software. Because of how it's built from the base it's really future proof. If it will have the most potential money making wise, I don't know, but after 2022 and all the scams, I'm going with security forward.
@@cryptocito I just checked the link and I wonder why Polkadot is not on there cuz they have the highest amount after Bitcoin with a co of 62-82 according to other sources
We still need to build the underlying infrastructure (shared security, interoperability) but there's already DEXs, trading tools, derivatives and so on which you can use today
When it comes to Polkadot's shared security model, they are actually by far market leaders. Avalanche still has a lot to catch up but I also don't even think that shared security has high priority on their roadmap
@cryptocito Avalanche not having shared security is a feature. It's a true layer 0. There is no single point of failure like there would be on Polkadot. If Polkadot's security is compromised, the entire network could be because there is only one shared security model. If you wanted, you could build Polkadot as a subnet on Avalanche. If shared security is important to your blockchain, build it into your subnet (blockchain) on Avalanche. If your shared security is compromised as an Avalanche subnet, it won't affect the entire Avalanche network, just the subnet itself.
@Seriksy I dont think that is true. Parachain auctions exist as a limitation of the Polkadot blockchain. Not everyone can make a Parachain. As I mentioned, you could even make Polkadot a subnet of Avalanche.
![Full Altcoin Crypto Bullrun Incoming? | Thorchain RUNE Cosmos Gem [IBC Coming Soon]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LuXvkF8An9U/mqdefault.jpg)
very complete and clear comparison. really instructive and really appreciated! thanks for this work
Cosmos Atom will be the clear winner in the future...the ecosystem is huge and promising
DOT will be more secure with better tokenomics
Time will tell... Question is : is there really a demand for more that many blockchains? My guess is NO, if there was adoption would be full send by now if it was. Its all running on eth and its L2s really. Other chains are mostly staking nfts empty traffic. So. E company's pick avalanche but most want run on centralized blockcheis as it is company and cant put faith of their business on some random validators. I closly follow developments but so far nothing really promising other than community fomo and hype. Any company thinking about blovkchain is better off to develop its own centralized and runing for purpose they build. Decentralization isnt for companys and institutions. And thats where real money are.
@@lurker668 i have the same thoughts like you. There is no need for so much layer1 projects therefore it is better to look at different spaces for example Internet of things and in this case IOTA it has enourmos potential beacuse it is a really different area with a lot of use case for everyday people
Do you guys buy both (diversity) or choice one
@@houdiny-Kary I diversify, but not with any of this garbage
I love this kind of comparative approach! The interchain future is here.
What I like from this video is the main goal: neutral speaking /analysis. I like the idea of you talking about other projects outside Cosmos. That gives you also a broader visión and tbh, it is refreshing. 😉👍
Great overview - I agree all three projects have a lot of promise and offer interoperability. Are Cosmo and Dot able to setup regulatory compliant chains? I know AVAX is focused on public and private subnets wondering how the others are approaching this?
DOT confirmed not a security ATOM has yet to be classified
Great content about the platforms.
Educative videos are excellent approach.
👏
Glad you like them!
Great video, a learned a lot. Thanks
Glad you enjoyed it!
So for now polkadot has more stuff driving up the price for the token but soon cosmos will have the same? Will it be a big narrative to even use this parachains? Im noob sry
Can't wait to see them all connected on Quant overledger.
Great video. Thanks for the breakdown and comparisons!
Thanks for watching!
Dot will conquer the world
I wanna see Avalanche fans here
Great information. No matter what oother chains have to offer, $ATOM just excites me. Strong believer of interchains!
dot staking info wrong too. They have dashboard now, and "Pools" minimum is very low (may be 5-20 dot, i don't remember) and depends of Pool's terms!
but it's NOT min=80.
Thanks but that's a pool then and not an individual nominator which is different. For ATOM, individuals can stake any amount
@@cryptocito Formaly you are right ) but users who want just to stake and get rewards - don't care about formals (by the way KSM min for pool around 0.02).
I have more confidence in Dot seriously. Gavin wood he is a genius and he is the one who wrote the code of Ethereum, he is a visionary
Cosmos seems to be copying DOT now. Gavin Wood is the OG.
Dot is slow, energy inefficient, the ui is terrible and not user friendly, parachains are expensive and often price projects out. In terms on layer 0 atom destroys dot.
@@almaghrabee they're completely different
@@lordPix3lUKcosmos moving to shared security now? Canary network? All the things cosmos guys have been bashing for years then they go and follow. Mate it's behind in thinking. Gavin Wood thought about all of this. Polkadot has been setup this way because of decentralization. Both will work together. But building on substrate was key by polkadot.
Great video, thanks 🙏
Glad it was helpful!
ICS will be an option, not mandatory, right? So the question is, except the newer & smaller projects, why would projects use it instead of their network of validators and increasing the value of their token?
It's not mandatory at all. Setting up a validator set is super difficult. You need to pitch them, build your own val infra, coordinate upgrades, somehow ensure decentralization and so on. Renting Cosmos Hub security means that new projects can go to market much faster and skip the hassle of doing the above
@@cryptocito Sure, would be much faster, but that would decrease the value of their token, which they would need to raise funds to rent the shared security. So I see the value of that, but not sure it's a killer application. I assume would be mostly like a launchpad ?
@@cryptocito Can you share which are the first 4 projects to use ICS?
nice vid fam
14:14 I mean why EVMOS logo representing Avalanche?😅 also at the beginning. 😂😂😂
Haha yeah good catch - our bad! :D
Thank you 🙏
The only true Layer 0 in crypto wins 💪😎. I'll pass on the Layer 2 with nightmare tokenomics. Small bag of Wavax for an Osmo or Kuji pool 👍. The Amazon partnership will have retail casuals pumping in...good future daytrade
Who got the Amazon partnership?
@@sterlingcampbell2116 avax
Cheers CC!
All these are good, but I see one stand out and that is Polkadot because of it's shared security. It also has the most developers and labels it self a software. Because of how it's built from the base it's really future proof. If it will have the most potential money making wise, I don't know, but after 2022 and all the scams, I'm going with security forward.
Absolutely Fantabulous video Cito
Many thanks!
amazing and fair comparison. thanks a lot!
Glad you liked it!
Awesome vid compair more coins
Good Job! Bright future for Atom.
I belive in atom
0:56 cito has small dot exposure/ no avax exposure
1:27 origin story:DOT
3:49 origin story AVAX
5:11 origin story Cosmos
7:24 network architecture DOT
9:41 network architecture AVAX
12:24 network architecture Cosmos Atom
14:32 native coins: DOT
16:32 native coins AVAX
17:59 native coins ATOM
19:25 ecosystem DOT
20:03 ecosystem AVAX
20:44 ecosystem ATOM
21:37 conclusion
22:35 predictions
Tips appreciated!
cosmos1xsnlq9mzrj40p2cya8pvupjqgquaatg7mxeh5k
EVMOS is the new AVAX
Hahaha 😂 that one slipped through my final check
Atom to the moon
What about the Nakamoto coefficient of the projects? Thank you for your objective video!
Check out nakaflow.io - I was gonna use it in that video but when I shot the video, the site was down for like 2-3 days :/
@@cryptocito I just checked the link and I wonder why Polkadot is not on there cuz they have the highest amount after Bitcoin with a co of 62-82 according to other sources
And result is Cosmos ecosystem is clear winner
It is, but I'm starting to wonder if bigger ecosystems doesn't mean that much when most are L2's?
COSMOS 🚀 E.T. PHONE HOME
wtf, evmos logo instead of avax logo? many times
Yeah that was a mistake in editing and slipped through my QC
What is that Evmos logo regularly doing in this video? Guerilla marketing?? :D
haha our bad in the editing won't happen again 😅
You used the evmos logo for avalanche 🤣
The answer is Cardano.
👍
Still waiting on some tangible applications without buzzwords like web3
We still need to build the underlying infrastructure (shared security, interoperability) but there's already DEXs, trading tools, derivatives and so on which you can use today
Polkadot best and safe after btc and eth
Avalanche all the way. Then Cosmos and I think Polkadot is stupid. Parachain auctions are dumb.
When it comes to Polkadot's shared security model, they are actually by far market leaders. Avalanche still has a lot to catch up but I also don't even think that shared security has high priority on their roadmap
@cryptocito Avalanche not having shared security is a feature. It's a true layer 0. There is no single point of failure like there would be on Polkadot. If Polkadot's security is compromised, the entire network could be because there is only one shared security model.
If you wanted, you could build Polkadot as a subnet on Avalanche. If shared security is important to your blockchain, build it into your subnet (blockchain) on Avalanche. If your shared security is compromised as an Avalanche subnet, it won't affect the entire Avalanche network, just the subnet itself.
@@cryptocito You got to admit, Parachain auctions are stupid and exist as a limitation to Polkadot's blockchain.
@@chesterg.791 I respectfully disagree. When it comes to thee Nakamoto coefficient, Polkadot is in second place, only behind BTC.
@Seriksy I dont think that is true. Parachain auctions exist as a limitation of the Polkadot blockchain. Not everyone can make a Parachain. As I mentioned, you could even make Polkadot a subnet of Avalanche.
Do we need to talk about old hacks anymore? I have 0 avax and 0 dot just saying.
It's part of the history so yeah that was the point of the video to provide background
3:45 -> not avax, its EVMOS! boon
Polkadot garbage
dot dot dot
DOT DOT DOT!
🤡