SSL Fusion Sound Demo (no talking)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- In this video we demonstrate the sound of different modules from the SSL Fusion.
*buy here: www.thomann.de...
*Affiliate-Links: Part of the revenue generated through these links will be paid to us as commission, depending on the measurable success. You are welcome to buy the products elsewhere. The link is only a suggestion to look at the products.
Legal notice:
Remise 3 Medienservice Agentur GmbH
Ludgerusstraße 46
47179 Duisburg
Represented by CEO: Hansi Tietgen
Amtsgericht Duisburg, HR B NUMMER 19797
Tel: 0203/498705
Fax: 0203/87 96 864
Email: office(at)remise3.de
VAT-ID: DE 256765312
Responsible for contents according to § 5 TMG: Hansi Tietgen
*Affiliate Links: Ein Teil des Umsatzes, der über diese Links generiert wird, wird je nach messbaren Erfolg an uns als Provision ausgezahlt. Ihr könnt die Produkte gerne woanders kaufen. Der Link dient lediglich als Vorschlag zum Anschauen der Produkte.
Impressum:
Remise 3 Medienservice Agentur GmbH
Ludgerusstraße 46 47179 Duisburg
Vertreten durch den Geschäftsführer: Hansi Tietgen
Amtsgericht Duisburg, HR B NUMMER 19797
Telefon: 0203/498705
Telefax: 0203/87 96 864
Email: office(at)remise3.de
Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer DE 256765312
Inhaltlich verantwortlich nach § 5 TMG: Hansi Tietgen
All demos should be like this one. No blah blah, and frequent bypass, so you can focus on sound only
True!
I love that he’s not scared to crank it
All hanging off the desk, slamming it in the red like a boss!
lol
🤣🤣
I love that he spanks it. Its analog. Go wild
I guess I've underestimated this unit all along! It took someone to really push this unit to the point of clipping for me to really hear the magic this thing can create!! A+!!!
Thx for your kind words. some like it red :-)
Finally!! Someone who drives it hard like I wanted to hear. Great!!
7:48 He turns the nasty highs down. :) Cool box! Will order.
Finally someone really putting it to the test !!! Great video thanks
Finally. With no commentary, thanks!!💪🏻
It's amazing on Metal! The Transformer did some awesomeness to the bass in the metal track. I installed my SSL Fusion today and tried it on a friends pre master Techno track and was left massively wanting. More tests to come. Your video got me super inspired to test this beast!
Such a nice comparison with three different genre!
good demo ----- well done
Thanks for the awesome demo, really showed all the capabilities of this lovely device.
Finally someone reviewing this who goes all the way to 11 with the drive knob so we can actually hear what it's doing. thank you! haha
pretty sure, you will love this too: ruclips.net/video/g8fvKhu0g4M/видео.html
Great demo, thanks.
Man, this unit is awesome. Only reason to get this though is the stereo imaging and HFC. The EQ is pretty disappointing considering the cost.. I expected a 3 band.
Drive module is badass, but I get very very similar result from the SSL six by just cranking the gain.
The input-output trim is a great addition too.
PERSONALLY, this unit is awesome.... but for people who don't have any other gear. Other than that it's really just more candy for the studio.
BTW, thanks for showing the extremes man, it's really the best way to tell the "Sound" of any analog gear, much appreciated.
If it sounds good its good 😎
That would be a monster on individual tracks....
I think 🤔 no sweepable Mid or Full G Comp on here
I think 🤔 getting the SSL 2Bus + with this is a must
Today I've read it has full SSL comp on; you just hold the button of HF comp for more than 5 seconds and it becomes the full frequency working SSL comp. It was the surprise (hidden gem)of the SSL company. :) so yeah. Crazy:))
Gain matched (8:18) didn't sound all that much better given it's steep cost/price (imo)!!
@mister poopies I respectfully DISAGREE. You can turn the volume 1db up and not only will it change the timbre of the sonics but listeners will ALWAYS choose the louder one because our brains always think that louder is better (within reason of course), and why?..because it usually sounds better. It's the same reason why when I add an element to the mix/master, I ALWAYS do it first at unity gain. Rule 101; always check your changes at unity gain and listen to what it's REALLY doing or not. In this case it made a minuscule difference when he did.
Why everyone crys about clipping lol, if it sounds good it sounds good. I like a clipping on drums anyway
And he's basically demonstrating the extremes, how far you can take the unit.
@@deetgeluid yes true
Sounds tremendous but it seems to be tipping off that desk...makes me nervous.
No worries, it´s solid state - haha!
@@ProducingBonedo pretty good actually.
Do you have these symptoms? I seem to have
problem with SSL FUSION. When I remove the pen
DRIVE counterclockwise, I have
small noise, and in the right channel it
more than on the left! This is clearly seen if
put an L2 limiter on the DAW master section, and
turn the limiter all the way.
I urgently need to find out because my SSL
FUSION is still under warranty!
awesome! I suck so the guitars should be mixed higher in the mix for the fusion....and the techno was muddy
i go mixmaster, heat, aural exciter. phoenix audio
keep in mind we are doing gear demos here not mastering :-)
Sweet machine. Need money
someday i hope to replace my ozone stereo imager2 with this
Guys, maybe clipping was the sound he was after? Expression and musicality in your mix > playing by the books.
And it sounds great. I did it and I achieved an amazing sound on a track of a client
I'm missing one thing, being able to swap eq and comp in the chain.
not really.the hf comp is not ur usual comp and needs no pre option imho. and if u use a external comp u can swap the insert pre. best, felix
It has a trim. maybe take advantage of it?
nah, never!
when you gain match the output trim and hit the bypass , there is almost no difference in sound .. too subtle
Exactly!
Yep, and as always, you could get 90% of this effect with plugins that are a fraction of the cost, and have total recall.
Who did the acustic song?
Can you please let me know what is the track that is playing in the first part of this video
its a simple demo song from bassel who is also writing reviews for bonedo.de in the guitar section
@@felikzk Cant find it anywhere?
Bom vídeo! Mas de facto a unidade não me impressiona. Creio que há dinheiro melhor gasto
Do you use a summing mixer?
I have the same question... it is necessary to have a summing mixer with this?
@@AlexPadronS nope not in this example
i think you are clipping bro...
That’s great that he’s showing what it sounds like pushed to the point of clipping.
@@RiotHomeRecording exactly i thought the same thing
Art vla also work ur back side
Overload
This unit is overhyped I think. I was playing with it in Amsterdam show, was dissapointed. When you tweak everything to the level you think you've improved the sound, but it sounds even better when bypassed because it's more natural... Nah. A great marketing trick however "everything for mastering in one box!"
😂😂😂😂😂
Very underwhelming sound to it. I went with a Neve MBP over this and I'm very happy I did. After hearing an A/B after your processing, there was not a sound I would be willing to throw $2500 at.
This is more a color box not the hammer for hitting hard. MBP is totaly different animal and it's boring or better said "nothing special"; the silk and the width functions are great, that's about it. Everything else you can do by plugins. SSL fusion is special unit for delicate work making Mona Lisa's out of music. The new Neve MBT is better choice. Now, that's a better stuff.
@@b.hornetiii.6771 This comment was written before the Neve MBT was released, so yes, the MBT is a definite SSL Fusion killer.
Saying the MBP is 'nothing special' is a trivial statement, and shows you haven't done precise listening with this unit. The silk is probably one of the most 'limited' functions of this box considering it can't be applied to M/S independently.
I have gripes about the MBP, which proves my analysis. You have nothing but empty statements about the SSL Fusion. Sounds like a fan boy, just saying.
@@AnnoDominiAudio The silk is the best thing about this unit because it takes into consideration both - mid range and sides - it has combined (different) effect for both and it's not over the top. You have "drive" if you want to go crazy. MBT is great, but for the price it goes? I don't think so. MBT is not going to change the sound of your mix so much more than SSL fusion that you're going to say: oh, yeah, now this is a mix. If you know how to mix, the little goes a long way and SSL fusion is more than enough.
@@b.hornetiii.6771 To each their own, but I wouldn't let price cloud my judgement. Again, after doing my listening on all of these units, the SSL Fusion wouldn't even get used in my rack.
You are correct that a little goes a long way, but it's the mix you put in that counts. If you have a solid mix, transparency is the goal, and the Neve units do that very well while maintaining the dynamics. I just don't enjoy the coloration that the SSL Fusion adds to a mix. Just my opinion.
@@AnnoDominiAudio I work on EDM music and I have a real problem giving that "sterile mix" a little analog spice (color, transformer's mojo) all over. I' ve tried with steinberg's UR RT2 interface that has Neve's transformers option (On- off), but that was not designed for the whole mix to go through it just ruins the lows and the highs, width etc., so I'm looking this SSL Fusion as a saviour for my problem. I want that crisp punch, a little width and warmth. If the Neve MBT is so much better I will go for MBT. I thought SSL would be enough for spiceing things up, is it that much of a difference?