I need someone who know how to use it CCFULL programe for the japanese scientists [ K. Hagino , N. Rowley and A. T. Kruppa ] called : A FORTRAN77 program for coupled-channels calculations with all order couplings for heavy-ion fusion reactions .
(3 years later but hey whatever) I believe the cause for this is that in the first term when L+ acts upon s, the whole term goes to 0 because L is already the maximum, therefore it cannot be acted upon by the L+ operator, causing the ENTIRE bracketed term to go to 0. As opposed to the second term, s+ acts upon L and yields something other than 0 because the s term was not already at its maximum, allowing the entire term to be acted upon by the operator without going to 0.
I need someone who know how to use it CCFULL programe for the japanese scientists [ K. Hagino , N. Rowley and A. T. Kruppa ] called :
A FORTRAN77 program for coupled-channels calculations with all order couplings for heavy-ion fusion reactions .
The treatments are really lucid. Do you have plans to go for a high energy physics lecture series? :)
Sir please give the applications of this model also
@18:54 why doesn't the -gs/2 term survive in the same way glL does at 19:08?
Always love your videos, it's often hard to find this sort of area explained in a clear enough way for a 16 yearold.
How ya doing now mate
nicely explained. Thanks for sharing
supp sir
at 19 :23 there is an inconsistency in the final line l acts on s and yields 0 while s acts on l and yields other than 0
(3 years later but hey whatever) I believe the cause for this is that in the first term when L+ acts upon s, the whole term goes to 0 because L is already the maximum, therefore it cannot be acted upon by the L+ operator, causing the ENTIRE bracketed term to go to 0. As opposed to the second term, s+ acts upon L and yields something other than 0 because the s term was not already at its maximum, allowing the entire term to be acted upon by the operator without going to 0.