Paradox last 4 games have been absolute flops destroying multiple series, especially Victoria. Dont think eu5 will be different. Its over guys it was a good run but paradox games will never be the same. Its over. Good thing Annebennar mod makes eu4 100x more replayable.
The advances seem pretty limiting, it forces you down the path of either admin, military or diplo. A better way (imo) would be to have a lead category, then a secondary, and a tertiary, that you can take say 6 in 1 group, 3 in another, and one from the last. It wouldn't make sense for Tunisian raiders to be taking 'debt and loans' and 'court accounting', and missing privateers and shrewd commerce simply because you've been forced down 1 path. It also means it would allow them to take naval glory or boarding parties too. This could lead to some really strong customization and roleplaying opportunities.
Wow, this is brilliant! You should send them this idea. I think it would work much better and be far more interesting than being locked into a guided path.
Extremely informative video! You didn’t really touch on the resources, one thing that would be in my top 10 list. I’m really curious on how they will shape our conquests in EU5.
I'd really love to see peace deals where both sides get and lose something! I don't understand how it might be that complex. They could just put a weight of how strongly does a nation desire a province/location (depending mostly on culture, trade, and value of the province) and how strongly they desire money (depending on debt and amount), vs how strongly they value their own provinces. Like if I'm France fighting Spain for the Netherlands they inherited, they'd probably accept to cede me more of Belgium if I return Roselló that I captured from them in a previous war. Or a greatly indebted Poland would be okay signing a peace with Brandenburg earlier if that means they get a lot of ducats in exchange for a few farmlands of Prussian culture they just recently got from the Teutons
really cool they used CK2's final start date for EU5, always did feel like that particular start date could have used more than CK2's mechanics, especially in regards to the entry of gunpowder and the aftermath of the Black Death
Victoria?? Ohh the series that paradox literally just ran into the ground and ruined?? Ohh yeah,, suuureeellyy they wont ruin europa universalis next riiighht?? Guys this is going to be horrible like the last 3 paradox releases. Its over guys.
Very nice to see them taking the best feature from Total War Rome. Your population directly affecting your military numbers and vice versa is fantastic. It would be fun if you could move your pops similarly to that too
it would be cool to see the ck3 mechanic of capturing a ruler to get warscore, where the amount gotten could maybe scale with government type or absolutism vs liberty that is to say 50% for early monarchy, maybe 10% for a presidency, etc just not 100%, that would not be fun
I don't like the idea. EU focuses on the historical transition from despotism to a large bureaucratic political machine. Maybe they could add that in the first age and eliminate it after a few ages. Also, from a mechanics perspective, how would I implement that? Is it RNG? I don't like the idea of having +/-50% of my warscore up to rng, euiv ai getting forts at 7% progress was more than enough. So I don't like the idea from the game direction POV and from a mechanical PoV.
@@theorixluxwell something that was always annoying was full occupation of an enemy, all their homeland including where their government is, and then having to sit in that war for years until they surrendered. it’s especially painful when they have a single ally a couple hundred miles away that will never white peace. and eu5 goes by hour ticks. this is to say, i think it will add more risk to assigning an heir or ruler to your armies, to losing your capital (where the ruler and their family would be otherwise), arbitrarily moving your capital to somewhere less safe, etc. again, i don’t want it to be 100%, and obviously as ages go on, especially as nationalism became a thing, the ruler meant less and less. that’s why i think that monarchies would hate to lose a ruler, and a plutocracy couldn’t really care less. if cabinet members were included, it’d add risk to shoving them in a border area of any war or rebellion, instead of them magically teleporting back to home like an occupied missionary in eu4
@@dualrotorhelicopter hmm, I see your point. How about instead of losing or gaining warscore from a captured ruler, you get army debuff/buffs modifiers? Or maybe gain or lose stability?
@@dualrotorhelicopter hmm, I see your point. How about instead of losing or gaining warscore from a captured ruler, you get army debuff/buffs modifiers? Or maybe gain or lose stability?
Awesome video, bro! Really hyped about this game. It seems they’re going a lot more realistic and in-depth. I’m loving it. Mixed feelings about the concept art though - hope it’s not part of the final game.
I'm afraid we'll need a quantum computer that's gonna be invented in 2037 to play the game with fluidity, with how much stuff Paradox is trying to put in the game
honestly i think that different continents should have different institutions so its fairer to play as non europeans nations. But to keep it historical I think europe should get institutions that buff them.
@@mischadebrouwer9855 I know! This is one of the elements I'm most excited about for Eu5. For example, the population management systems looks half way between Victoria 3 and Stellaris.
It all sounds pretty good. My worry is that it becomes too detailed and too micro. More is not always better. Sometimes less is more. So I hope there are mechanics allowing you to delegate certain aspects.
I really like the idea of diplomatic range and capacity. A small nation should in theory demand less than a big one and not being able to send a diplomat very far at the start of the game I think should be a good change.
The trade changes are great, historically China had a major trade surplus by selling silk and importing gold, and that’s true for the entire duration of EU4.
Regardless armies, i might missed it and you mentioned that but There will be option to lend army (well as mercenery) to other countries, however if they lose soldiers, you will lose pops.
For the Ideas, I think they're just gonna end up like missions in eu4, with many nations being left far behind with unique content and a handful of nations in each region having massive advancements and benefits compared to other nations. Good video though.
thank you for using your time to make this video, it was very informative. Sadly I fear how MP will playout. This game seems really anti WAR. Ofc we can just mod it out like gecko does. But this game might be the one where we dont have to kill players and actually might keep bigger lobbies active for a longer time lol
Early game it's going to be tough. I think that is correct as admislnistering a large natijlon in the 14th century would have been very difficult. I imagine with tech things will get easier
Cabinet actions sounds really micro heavy, especially integrating things, I hope it comes with a lot of QOA of life automations that EU4 had at its it end (AND WAY MORE) Having to click every single province to add parliament seats for example is a pain
@@Dhaiky I dont think it will be micro heavy at all. It looks like something you'll be changing every few dacedes (integrating a province takes around 20y)
im not buying shit until the games out and ive seen 10 hours of gameplay, i asume as all paradox games its going to be barebones game with 50 dlcs planned ahead of time for the low low price of a used car.
You really believe it will be barebone even after watching this vid? Also, the game is bot even announced as they keep improving it and adding more flavor
Wow, when EU4 came out, I felt like it took a couple of years of DLC before it was outright a better game than EU3. This video gave me hope that EU5 will be solid right out of the gates!
As 2k hours rolplay player who s objective in eu4 is to recreate alternative history by using slef created mods and even boosting other countries witch comands to stop snowballing I have always wanted to see changes like that and I agree witch 99% of this changes and I am realy looking forward to see eu5.
I hope it will be better than ck3. Played it recently, compared to ck2 - very unpolished unfinished weak game. I hope EU5 will make good UI. Intuitive UI is so important! Please, I hope they think this aspect through🙏 (As before, ck2 have most of its ui in one place, ck3 scattered it all over the screen making it harder to play fast and efficiently, hence, increasing the difficulty for new players + inefficient space usage)
I love that the armies will have a ai control mecanic, but man i need the missions to be a thing in eu5, and honestly the development mecanic is 50/50 we will se how it turns out, but i gotta add that i will miss the manna mecanic, it made the game somewhat fun or in some way just great, maybe add some more mana simmeler types but dont remove the old system
@@reichtanglevictor1694 it only looks lik on the first sight, but it's not really, it's actually closer to Vicky2 than 3 in some aspects Different studio is working on that game (Tinto, that handled EU4 after Leviathan + they hired more people like M&T modders). Johan, game director is #1hater of Victoria 3. It has more EU features tha Vicky features. They are actually taking their time with the game, 4.5 years of development and it's not even announced yet. Also they are showing the WiP stuff early to get community feedback and they listen to it a lot
Same game engine… so ofcourse it has similarities. But they have definitely different points what they try to fullfill! Victoria 3 is more economy game. This has more wilitary wibe. Not as much as HOI… but they all have different thing what part is in focus.
Eu 5 looks like it will be such a fun game. Although for some unknown reason I have an uneasy feeling that mp in this game is gonna suck real bad. Hope this feeling doesn't become reality.
I think the idea group thing is a bit of a hit and miss, not being able to pick old ones. It can easily make some ideagroups obsolete, like deus vult in eu4 is so strong, if it is as strong in this game, the mil and dip idea group, even if they could be strong on their own, might be just outshined by this one single thing. So Imo i think you should be able to pick older ones aswell meaby with some restrictions.
EU4 is probably my all time or second all time favorite game. I hope EU5 somehow manages to be a better game and not another Victoria 3. And after this video I don't know what it's going to be
seen all tinto talks, maps and buildings. still have no good picture in my head how the game will play. for example, it still will be a game and still a wargame at the end of the day so i doubt war will be something to absolutely avoid but sometimes it did almost sound that way.
I really hope this game isn't too micro heavy, I like to speed 5, and I hope I can put character management on the backfoot as I prefer the nation controlling style of EU4. But looking forward to it and hope it releases in a state worthy of what could be a flagship game.
@@backstabber3537true. Automatisation shouldn't be perfect as there would be no reason to do something manually. Imo 80-90% of capability should be enough for automatic mode.
Could you explain how the research will work? You focused on IDEAS and skipped research. I preferred the EU1, 2 and 3 with the money being spent on the research. I would also appreciate if you could build up a strong nation and the game would be flexible about that (like in EU3) and not that some countries are automatically stronger than others (fixed like in EU4). Development would be closer to EU3 from what I can see so they return to the old schema. I can see the same with trade and not pre-fixed trade like in EU4. This is good! :) As for the start of the game, I would suggest year 1299 and not 1337. Why? Becuase it is the beginning of a new century - it is similar like EU3 has with IN NOMINE (1399). I think more middle ages period is needed in this game. Overall, I can see Paradox reverts much to EU1, 2 and 3 style and skipping mana generating points for ADM, DIPLO and MIL. This is good. I would like to speed up research by spending money than using some weird points spending system. The CONS from what I see is that the game looks like a step back in terms of graphics. I prefer beautiful paintings of characters rather than 3D-generated stuff. Please tell Paradox (if you would care) that what makes EU great is also the graphics centered around classical paintings, e.g. those beatufiul loading screens of EU4. I mean the character portraits to look classical painting-alike. That added this nice vibe and charm to every EU game. I still love EU2 opening with the classical music on.
I don’t like the new artillery system. It is really not historical, maybe in the Middle Ages the cannons were used to bombard but even in the 30 years war they were the key to winning a battle. Gustavus changed its use..
All they have to do is have an option to have the battles be fought in some way where the player controls the units, and yet, they still have yet to do it. IDK why. They have made games where you can control units why cant they do it in EU?
@@ZlewikkTV Total War has bare bones map control that is extremely cookie cutter, the battles are good but that is about it. IDK how people play with skipping 100% of the battles and only doing the map control, but apparently it is extremely popular. The closest game I have seen to what I was looking for was Grand Tactician: The Civil War, but that fell short in a lot of ways with the map controls.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
ENEBA - marketplace for gamers! ene.ba/ZlewikkTV
Gift Cards at ENEBA! ene.ba/ZlewikkTV-GiftCards
Best Games at ENEBA! ene.ba/ZlewikkTV-Games
Does anyone have information when eu5 will be released?
They recently confirmed that the end date is 1837
(put my right hand in my jacket at the level of the stomach)
Nice, that means belgium.
@@Boi-dj3eo and Bolivar.
They have already confirmed that the ending date is 1837, so the game lasts 500 years
Dynamic trade really excites me. I just want to play as a comfy trade empire.
I am very excited to play tall as a durch nation
@@hernancortez5865 Durch courage!
Paradox last 4 games have been absolute flops destroying multiple series, especially Victoria. Dont think eu5 will be different. Its over guys it was a good run but paradox games will never be the same. Its over. Good thing Annebennar mod makes eu4 100x more replayable.
@@RomanBellic-g2c i think i am one of the few people who enjoy vic 3
@ did you take the vaccine just wondering
The advances seem pretty limiting, it forces you down the path of either admin, military or diplo. A better way (imo) would be to have a lead category, then a secondary, and a tertiary, that you can take say 6 in 1 group, 3 in another, and one from the last. It wouldn't make sense for Tunisian raiders to be taking 'debt and loans' and 'court accounting', and missing privateers and shrewd commerce simply because you've been forced down 1 path. It also means it would allow them to take naval glory or boarding parties too. This could lead to some really strong customization and roleplaying opportunities.
Wow, this is brilliant!
You should send them this idea. I think it would work much better and be far more interesting than being locked into a guided path.
“Oh! Look who controls all the islands. It’s the Mahajapit! [X] Majahapit! [X] Mapajahit! [X] Mahapajit! [X] Mapajahit! [X] Maja-pahit? [✓]”
ey guys this is zlewikk
Wow
ey guys this is zlewikk
ey guys this is zlewikk
ey guys this is zlewikk
Ey guys this is zlewikk
Extremely informative video!
You didn’t really touch on the resources, one thing that would be in my top 10 list. I’m really curious on how they will shape our conquests in EU5.
Yeah, just mentioned a bit around Buildings, Trade and Pops :)
I will buy EU5 as soon as I have all achievements of EU4. Current estimation is three years after my retirement.
*Cough* Steam Achievement Manager *Cough*
@@vedantthapar3666 Where is the point in that challenge then?
A great thing to automate armies/fleet. Such as talking a fleet to chase an enemy fleet which was threatening my trade, as a sideshow to the land war.
Very informative, just what I needed as I haven't read the diaries
Spicy achievement idea : as Austria, get a painter.
As ruler
and conquer all german ethnic territories
"as an Austrian painter, become German ruler."
Can't wait to play Anbennar with population system 😂
Purging orcs time!
Thank You for this video, Zlewikk🙏
Exactly what I wanted to see + hungarian sees polish friend + W + ratio + ido szabli ido szklanki + tax meta
I'd really love to see peace deals where both sides get and lose something! I don't understand how it might be that complex. They could just put a weight of how strongly does a nation desire a province/location (depending mostly on culture, trade, and value of the province) and how strongly they desire money (depending on debt and amount), vs how strongly they value their own provinces. Like if I'm France fighting Spain for the Netherlands they inherited, they'd probably accept to cede me more of Belgium if I return Roselló that I captured from them in a previous war. Or a greatly indebted Poland would be okay signing a peace with Brandenburg earlier if that means they get a lot of ducats in exchange for a few farmlands of Prussian culture they just recently got from the Teutons
They have it in Vic3
Thanks for the video. I spend a lot of time reading each tinto talks but it's getting a lot over the time.
really cool they used CK2's final start date for EU5, always did feel like that particular start date could have used more than CK2's mechanics, especially in regards to the entry of gunpowder and the aftermath of the Black Death
If the army was going to be the same as Vicky 3, I wasn't going to buy it.
I mean frontline battle can make sense for some part of the vic timeline but for the europa universalis one that would be nuts
No, Johan has gone on record saying he dislikes many of the design decisions for Vic3, including the war and how pops were implemented
Victoria?? Ohh the series that paradox literally just ran into the ground and ruined?? Ohh yeah,, suuureeellyy they wont ruin europa universalis next riiighht?? Guys this is going to be horrible like the last 3 paradox releases. Its over guys.
@@genuscorvidjust like eu5 will be.
@RomanBellic-g2c Well this is an entirely different studio that was created just for this game, so all we can do is hope.
Sounds really great.
It will be a pleasure to see you play it.
I'd like to see a notepad feature in the game. Something simple to leave notes for yourself.
i have a real notepad and pencil next to my keyboard. consider me old school, but nothing beats writing things in "free mode" :D
I LOVE the move to make things more dynamic!
TY. Nice to get a summary comparison of EU4 vs EUxxx
Thanks for the summary and explanations !
3:11 - sounds like they applying the Crusader kings county system in. Interesting.
Very nice to see them taking the best feature from Total War Rome. Your population directly affecting your military numbers and vice versa is fantastic. It would be fun if you could move your pops similarly to that too
Please keep this format and review the facts every few devdiarys
it would be cool to see the ck3 mechanic of capturing a ruler to get warscore, where the amount gotten could maybe scale with government type or absolutism vs liberty
that is to say 50% for early monarchy, maybe 10% for a presidency, etc
just not 100%, that would not be fun
maybe even including a far smaller amount for capturing cabinet members?
I don't like the idea. EU focuses on the historical transition from despotism to a large bureaucratic political machine. Maybe they could add that in the first age and eliminate it after a few ages.
Also, from a mechanics perspective, how would I implement that? Is it RNG? I don't like the idea of having +/-50% of my warscore up to rng, euiv ai getting forts at 7% progress was more than enough.
So I don't like the idea from the game direction POV and from a mechanical PoV.
@@theorixluxwell something that was always annoying was full occupation of an enemy, all their homeland including where their government is, and then having to sit in that war for years until they surrendered. it’s especially painful when they have a single ally a couple hundred miles away that will never white peace.
and eu5 goes by hour ticks.
this is to say, i think it will add more risk to assigning an heir or ruler to your armies, to losing your capital (where the ruler and their family would be otherwise), arbitrarily moving your capital to somewhere less safe, etc.
again, i don’t want it to be 100%, and obviously as ages go on, especially as nationalism became a thing, the ruler meant less and less. that’s why i think that monarchies would hate to lose a ruler, and a plutocracy couldn’t really care less.
if cabinet members were included, it’d add risk to shoving them in a border area of any war or rebellion, instead of them magically teleporting back to home like an occupied missionary in eu4
@@dualrotorhelicopter hmm, I see your point. How about instead of losing or gaining warscore from a captured ruler, you get army debuff/buffs modifiers? Or maybe gain or lose stability?
@@dualrotorhelicopter hmm, I see your point. How about instead of losing or gaining warscore from a captured ruler, you get army debuff/buffs modifiers? Or maybe gain or lose stability?
Awesome video, bro! Really hyped about this game. It seems they’re going a lot more realistic and in-depth. I’m loving it. Mixed feelings about the concept art though - hope it’s not part of the final game.
Every week a video sounds good too tough, you could do both :D
I'm afraid we'll need a quantum computer that's gonna be invented in 2037 to play the game with fluidity, with how much stuff Paradox is trying to put in the game
honestly i think that different continents should have different institutions so its fairer to play as non europeans nations. But to keep it historical I think europe should get institutions that buff them.
Thank you for this :D
Omg, the legend himself
4:58 this is a feature from Stellaris that they're finally going to implement into Europa Universalis
They are taking rules from various of their games. I myself recognise a lot of the gameplay of Imperator Rome
@@mischadebrouwer9855 I know! This is one of the elements I'm most excited about for Eu5. For example, the population management systems looks half way between Victoria 3 and Stellaris.
Very good summary Zlewikk, well done
It all sounds pretty good. My worry is that it becomes too detailed and too micro. More is not always better. Sometimes less is more. So I hope there are mechanics allowing you to delegate certain aspects.
Depend on how well that object system work… But a lot of things to take care of!
We received a guide of eu5 before eu5 is released
Imperator + EU4 + EU3 = EU5
Un vicy2 has like a whole lot of influence on it kinda crazy to not mention it tbh
Can't wait to try it.
I really like the idea of diplomatic range and capacity.
A small nation should in theory demand less than a big one and not being able to send a diplomat very far at the start of the game I think should be a good change.
wow
Wow
@@ZlewikkTVdont you think they’re gonna ruin it like they did vic 3?
I hope there will be finally another epic trailer XD
The trade changes are great, historically China had a major trade surplus by selling silk and importing gold, and that’s true for the entire duration of EU4.
Regardless armies, i might missed it and you mentioned that but
There will be option to lend army (well as mercenery) to other countries, however if they lose soldiers, you will lose pops.
Civ5 in Clausewitz engine. Cool
Civ5 is tens of times simpler than this…
But yeah… there are some similalitiers.
😂
Parliament? I AM THE PARLIAMENT! XD
For the Ideas, I think they're just gonna end up like missions in eu4, with many nations being left far behind with unique content and a handful of nations in each region having massive advancements and benefits compared to other nations.
Good video though.
thank you for using your time to make this video, it was very informative. Sadly I fear how MP will playout. This game seems really anti WAR. Ofc we can just mod it out like gecko does. But this game might be the one where we dont have to kill players and actually might keep bigger lobbies active for a longer time lol
I can’t see how conquest will be feasible
Early game it's going to be tough. I think that is correct as admislnistering a large natijlon in the 14th century would have been very difficult. I imagine with tech things will get easier
Hopefully it is not possible!
In reality… it is impossible so it should not be possible in games either!
Cabinet actions sounds really micro heavy, especially integrating things, I hope it comes with a lot of QOA of life automations that EU4 had at its it end (AND WAY MORE) Having to click every single province to add parliament seats for example is a pain
@@Dhaiky I dont think it will be micro heavy at all. It looks like something you'll be changing every few dacedes (integrating a province takes around 20y)
Great video Zlewikk!
im not buying shit until the games out and ive seen 10 hours of gameplay, i asume as all paradox games its going to be barebones game with 50 dlcs planned ahead of time for the low low price of a used car.
You really believe it will be barebone even after watching this vid?
Also, the game is bot even announced as they keep improving it and adding more flavor
Ofcourse!
Everyhting we see now. Some stuff will be in base game and some in DLC when they just deside what belongs to DLCs and what base game…
Imagine crusader wars mod converted into eu5
Love the way you say CB ^^;
Wow, when EU4 came out, I felt like it took a couple of years of DLC before it was outright a better game than EU3. This video gave me hope that EU5 will be solid right out of the gates!
As 2k hours rolplay player who s objective in eu4 is to recreate alternative history by using slef created mods and even boosting other countries witch comands to stop snowballing I have always wanted to see changes like that and I agree witch 99% of this changes and I am realy looking forward to see eu5.
They started mixing good ideas with bad ideas like that manpower/pops pool, instead of using soldier pops, im starting to worried.
I hope it will be better than ck3. Played it recently, compared to ck2 - very unpolished unfinished weak game.
I hope EU5 will make good UI. Intuitive UI is so important! Please, I hope they think this aspect through🙏 (As before, ck2 have most of its ui in one place, ck3 scattered it all over the screen making it harder to play fast and efficiently, hence, increasing the difficulty for new players + inefficient space usage)
Oh nooo, diplomats from eu3... So annoying. I hope they won't make the same with missionaries and building construction... and merchants
Hey @ZlewikkTV , Hey guys, do you maybe know if polish language will be supported in the EU5?
I love that the armies will have a ai control mecanic, but man i need the missions to be a thing in eu5, and honestly the development mecanic is 50/50 we will se how it turns out, but i gotta add that i will miss the manna mecanic, it made the game somewhat fun or in some way just great, maybe add some more mana simmeler types but dont remove the old system
I haven't been so hyped for a new game since Fallout 4, and that's mostly because I honestly believe Paradox can deliver... unlike Bethesda
I'm really scared of how similar to Vic 3 this looks. I have a feeling they're gonna mess up this title too
@@reichtanglevictor1694 it only looks lik on the first sight, but it's not really, it's actually closer to Vicky2 than 3 in some aspects
Different studio is working on that game (Tinto, that handled EU4 after Leviathan + they hired more people like M&T modders).
Johan, game director is #1hater of Victoria 3.
It has more EU features tha Vicky features.
They are actually taking their time with the game, 4.5 years of development and it's not even announced yet. Also they are showing the WiP stuff early to get community feedback and they listen to it a lot
@@ZlewikkTV Yeah, you also make good points. Here's hoping
Same game engine… so ofcourse it has similarities. But they have definitely different points what they try to fullfill!
Victoria 3 is more economy game. This has more wilitary wibe. Not as much as HOI… but they all have different thing what part is in focus.
Eu 5 looks like it will be such a fun game. Although for some unknown reason I have an uneasy feeling that mp in this game is gonna suck real bad. Hope this feeling doesn't become reality.
I'm kinda hoping for the old EU4 terrain style where its a percentage on your general's logistic stat :/
Great vid Z!
There's no way this game will run by the end date is there
I think the idea group thing is a bit of a hit and miss, not being able to pick old ones. It can easily make some ideagroups obsolete, like deus vult in eu4 is so strong, if it is as strong in this game, the mil and dip idea group, even if they could be strong on their own, might be just outshined by this one single thing. So Imo i think you should be able to pick older ones aswell meaby with some restrictions.
EU4 is probably my all time or second all time favorite game. I hope EU5 somehow manages to be a better game and not another Victoria 3. And after this video I don't know what it's going to be
I just want to play it already
33:30 can we go full Stellaris on them?
I have high hopes for the mods coming to the game
I just want a version where the AI plays by the same rules I do.
I think it's a bit too early tbh. Edward III and the Hundred Years' War belongs to CK era
Did they bring back diplo points from vic2? WHY?!
The mozt exciting thing about EU5 is that they will finally stop updating and changing EU4.
I am afraid EU5 would be much like CK3 and Victoria 3 a flashy but ultimately a shallow game which loses against it's prequel.
I'm afraid of forest fires.
War is gonna be so much more intense. Cant wait to watch a streamer do a war on 5 speed and watch their population just die outright lol
Where are my food vagons…
Sorry! All the farmers are in your armies and/ or dead allready!
thank you for this video
By moving off the mana system and towards a population system, it makes the minor countries weak and unplayable.
is paradox planning to create some tool for converting games to make a giga campaign from imeprator to hoi?
I guess so :p
@ZlewikkTV there are some information?
@@igniscarn19 i think I saw Johan saying that it's too early for this for now, but he didnt say no
@@ZlewikkTV nice
will it be good or imperator 2.0?
I guess we will see. For a comparison, I:R was developped for like less a year. EU5 is in development since 2020
Thank you for video, but wich PC config need for play nicely?
EU5 will run much better than EUIV, due to its engine limitations. Nothing crazy, a good CPU, because it's CPU-heavy.
1337 100 years war is starting as well
seen all tinto talks, maps and buildings. still have no good picture in my head how the game will play. for example, it still will be a game and still a wargame at the end of the day so i doubt war will be something to absolutely avoid but sometimes it did almost sound that way.
I haven't had to update my computer to handle EU4....I'm not looking forward to having to do it for EU5
I really hope this game isn't too micro heavy, I like to speed 5, and I hope I can put character management on the backfoot as I prefer the nation controlling style of EU4. But looking forward to it and hope it releases in a state worthy of what could be a flagship game.
I hope it is and it allows automation but I hope if u wanna optimize u must micro
@@backstabber3537true. Automatisation shouldn't be perfect as there would be no reason to do something manually. Imo 80-90% of capability should be enough for automatic mode.
@@arekzawistowski2609 agree
Could you explain how the research will work? You focused on IDEAS and skipped research. I preferred the EU1, 2 and 3 with the money being spent on the research. I would also appreciate if you could build up a strong nation and the game would be flexible about that (like in EU3) and not that some countries are automatically stronger than others (fixed like in EU4). Development would be closer to EU3 from what I can see so they return to the old schema. I can see the same with trade and not pre-fixed trade like in EU4. This is good! :)
As for the start of the game, I would suggest year 1299 and not 1337. Why? Becuase it is the beginning of a new century - it is similar like EU3 has with IN NOMINE (1399). I think more middle ages period is needed in this game.
Overall, I can see Paradox reverts much to EU1, 2 and 3 style and skipping mana generating points for ADM, DIPLO and MIL. This is good. I would like to speed up research by spending money than using some weird points spending system.
The CONS from what I see is that the game looks like a step back in terms of graphics. I prefer beautiful paintings of characters rather than 3D-generated stuff. Please tell Paradox (if you would care) that what makes EU great is also the graphics centered around classical paintings, e.g. those beatufiul loading screens of EU4. I mean the character portraits to look classical painting-alike. That added this nice vibe and charm to every EU game. I still love EU2 opening with the classical music on.
Here you have my full video on advances - ruclips.net/video/R0BKqmW8Bkk/видео.html :)
If you had to guess when would you say EU5 comes out?
Early 2026 I think
I don’t like the new artillery system. It is really not historical, maybe in the Middle Ages the cannons were used to bombard but even in the 30 years war they were the key to winning a battle. Gustavus changed its use..
He used light mobile cannon not just a lot of them
So basically Meiou mod but with less features.
Normies can't handle Meiou, their heads would explode.
@@AFrenchGuyIGuess Just like the computer running it.
wow nice
Grałbym.
1337 the leetest start date
I’m ready for imperator Rome: EU5 🙂↕️🙂↕️
That sounds like an insane amount of micromanagement, im not looking forward to that tbh
@@Rocek did you miss the part about full and part automations then?
All they have to do is have an option to have the battles be fought in some way where the player controls the units, and yet, they still have yet to do it. IDK why. They have made games where you can control units why cant they do it in EU?
That would be the worst, just play Total War honestly :p
@@ZlewikkTV Total War has bare bones map control that is extremely cookie cutter, the battles are good but that is about it. IDK how people play with skipping 100% of the battles and only doing the map control, but apparently it is extremely popular.
The closest game I have seen to what I was looking for was Grand Tactician: The Civil War, but that fell short in a lot of ways with the map controls.
Meanwhile fps and optimization in eu5 😏
Fps? Do u mean simulation speed?
Yeah PDX and optimization are bitter rivals apparently.
fps doesnt matter 60 stable should be good , optimization is more important esp in late game
i cant watch video because the game is l0oking to be so good
The Trade map looks wrong. Too large regions.
@@smftrsddvjiou6443 as said, the system will be dynamic, this is just a starting map. You can dhape it however you want to