"I'm calling for men to take control of their own lives again." - Camille Paglia, Feminist. There should really be a lot more people like her. Camille is a feminist, but she has really earned my respect, simply for being actually for equality, not equity, and not female supremacy.
"I'm calling for middle class girls to stop asking for special protections. It's up to women themselves to understand the dangers of the world and not expect the world to be an extention of their protected comfortable middle-class living room." Brilliant.
Jessica I an MRA. But I believed we need more women like her. He wave of feminist I can work with side by side any day. Unlike this third wave feminist.
Based. Men can learn a lot from women. I have. My own mother has a lot in common with Camille in the sense that she's always been "gender non-conforming" (for lack of a better word) while also being very loving and caring. She's always been more assertive and ambitious than my dad lol, so in a lot of ways I picked up on the essences of manhood from watching my mom as opposed to my phlegmatic, almost manchild-like dad. Anyway yes I think if it were more acceptable for Gen Z women to have the kind of wisdom, sense, and strength of character that Camille Paglia does, I think men and women would be on better terms. Instead we have identity politics and "yasssss queen I'm queerrrrr, I'm fierceeee" and black-and-white thinking.
THE GODDES OF INTELLECTULITY: CAMILLE PAGLIA.My intellectual independence came when I read her books.I am your number one fan in Brazil: Fabio Veroneze
"Any man who abuses or denigrates women is showing a weakness which comes from some inner-sense he has for women's overwhelming power." We shouldn't abuse anybody. But denigration? Who's to say denigrating another person has anything to do with her gender?
+gherrrie+ Do folks like you (religious cranks) troll RUclips just to look for an opening to drop your turds into conversations that have NOTHING to do at all with religion? Please find another hobby, maybe something truly worth while, like ... teach someone to read, help the homeless, help out at soup kitchens, help the disabled, volunteer at children's hospitals ...
29:50 - call for men to redefine themselves and take ownership for themselves 42:27 - up to women to stand up for themselves and not expect the world to be an extension of their living room
Saying that Jewish people own a lot of things is anti-semitic? Last I checked, it means treating Jewish people with hostility and unfairness. When did this happen?
"Its up to women themselves to protect themselves", very good. Extension of the idea that the best way to deal with bullying is to offer self defense. She is putting her finger on something really important and apparently unknown to modern people, namely, that freedom and risk are interwoven.
Women “doing life together rings true”. I miss this in my own life, my mother is deceased and I have no sisters, or female in-laws living close. I’m most happy when I’m with my young adult daughter’s just chatting and spending time together.
Yes. As I understand, they have kind of a similar family heritage ("working class" if you will), are self-made man/woman and both have got to know all parts of society during their working lifes. Their thoughts are original and bear a lot of truth in them because they first look at reality and then apply or reject theories based on that. Not like many professors of today who first learn a theory/ideology and then with a big amount of ignorance try to squeeze and adjust reality to their preferred theory. Paglia and Peterson represent to a much greater extent the spirit of the original universal scholars who embody the essence of what a university is - or rather: should be.
Loved this talk, and esp the Q & A. I recently saw her conversation with Jordan Peterson, it's one of the most eye opening conversations I've ever listened to. Two intellectual giants, for sure.
agreed … but she doesn't just speak for wo-men … she speaks for men as well .. she speaks for all of us .. if we've got any sense at all .. we should listen
This woman is absolutely brilliant!! I love everything that comes out of her mouth/brain. She should be doing speaking tours of college campuses around the western world.
Love the libertarian chick at the end. Sensible. Clear-minded. Strong. Nobody's victim. And Camille hit the ball out of the park, as usual. These are people to get "excited about" --independent thinkers with some actual philosophical grounding, aside from cheap political stuffing. I love Camille from dawn until sundown, but will call her out on her biggest weakness: her atheism. It's a damaging bit of cant, on her part. A well-argued agnostic stance would be smarter for her body of work, in terms of logistics: she will die and be known as an atheist. And there's nothing so insufferable as an atheist ... aside from a wig-wacking fundamentalist ... and those two disparate creatures are frighteningly alike. But I love the way her mind works. I wish our universities were filled with minds like this. Our kids would THRIVE with perceptive thinkers like her. All hail, Camille, and I mean it.
Right before Winston and Julia gets caught by the thought police in 1984 Winston goes into an entire dialogue about a Pole woman. How strong and sturdy she was. How powerful her voice was and much respect she demanded. He referred to her as the future. That never made any sense to me until listening to this.
One thing I wish she'd point out more. Is how men form relationships with other men as well. One thing we've noticed in studying is that men form longer lasting friendships with other men. While female relationships don't last as long for women in being friends with women. Men I theorize had to form these bonds to other men because of the nature of being a hunter, and a warrior. You had to trust them, with your life. We form these close bonds that don't die easily. Also that men don't have to say as much they say much more via body language. We can tell a story with looks rather than words.
pretty good points here … men have always been more club-able … wo-men tend more to bitch … men just have this emotional honesty … guess if U're facing a wild bear or a fierce tiger a bit of honesty helps … trouble with wo-men is this emotional dishonesty .. wo-men don't really do rules … never have .. never will .. tends to be every gall for herself
You are seeing this within the constraints of a patriarchy where women are pitted against each other as a sort of divisive political act. Also, I communicate with other women with far less words than men require from me. You are making observation from a fishbowl.
shes right about psychological dislocation today... i think we need to venerate money and corporate work less, and spend some more time growing salads, doing the laundry by hand... maybe all students could take some months off and work on a small farm ... eg south of france... working outdoors is grounding.
One question I'd have for feminists who claim women and men are the same is, "Then what is trans? If you change from one thing to another that is identical, what is that change?". I've encountered a similar question from Jordan Peterson, "If women and men are the same, what are the hormones for?". It would be very interesting to hear what Camille Paglia thinks about such subjects, both from her statement that gender studies needs to incorporate biology, and that she considers herself "trans" in some way that did not require hormones.
On point! Rejection of historical narratives absolutely underminds any progress made by marginalized people. This is why we have witnessed such a paradoxical regression in so called " progressivism" If civilization denies its growing pains and violent origins through hundreds of thousands of years of trial and error, how exactly do we measure progress? Consciousness is transcendent and transformative. Thanks Camille for steering us toward a renaissance instead of a new dark age. Been there, done that!!! Mad love.
She's one of the only people speaking on the absolute brilliance/talent of Madonna, seeing her as one of the most impactful, influential women of the 20th century, in so many important ways.
what other term is more appropriate than sjw? i wont use liberal because i consider myself to be a liberal and i dont buy into this ideology. I wont refer to them as "the left" like Ben Shapiro does since I still consider myself left wing. I wont call them feminists because they are not looking for equal rights for women, they are looking for special privileges for women and people of color as well as muslims (almost forgot transtrenders), and they have made the straight white male the enemy.
A friend of mine is a retired stock broker. And he was telling me that there is no classes on money and how to handle it any more in the US. No wonder credit debt has hit over a trillion dollars now.
good for you red shift hope you enjoy dying alone with no family by your side. You're just a male version of a crazy cat lady, or an old maid. Also just out of curiousity, does your tinfoil hat make your head itch?
if MGTOW becomes the new thing for all men like you claim above then the human race is finished. MGTOW is just another loud vocal minority just like feminists and equally as preachy and annoying. I think I'll stay with my family thanks.
Can someone cut out the SJW at 32:58 and repost separately? It would be nice to post just him to illustrate what in fact an SJW is . I am not computer literate enough to do that.... maybe I could google how to? Otherwise, I have just discovered Camille Paglia and am very impressed! I think she and Toronto's Jordan Peterson would make for a highly entertaining and thought provoking event!
Freedom for all people. A separation of our true selves from politics. True autonomy of personae for all people. Harmony with nature. Her perspective on how Trump won. Education to encourage entrepreneurs. What a fresh perspective. Seldom do I hear a voice that does not echo so many others.
that's a start …. Oscar Wilde called out the hypocrisies of his age … liberal lefties are full of stinking hypocrisies + stupid intolerances that need called out NOW
I agree that women want to be with other women, we are starving for it. I think that's one reason why Taylor Swift has become so hugely popular among younger women, it's a chance for them to be together and enjoy themselves.
Demand for equality of treatment demonstrates that we are in fact not equal otherwise there would be no need for the permission seeking. That said, we should all be treated with reciprocity. Equality isn’t a stable position because people are not actually equal but reciprocity is a demonstrable measure of interaction that can be adjudicated scientifically in value neutral language.
Camille I just want to comment that it is so nice to actually be able to understand what you're saying because you slowed you are speaking down by like 50%, which also cut down on the stammering I'm sure that was very hard for you so as a member of your listening audience I wanted to say thank you! I love everything you say but usually have trouble listening.
Absolutely brilliant.... I feel cheated to have just now stumbled upon her. Imagine a baby boomer trans female feminist who holds dearly the SAME values a white cis male. And that's what makes us Americans.
You fail to see the difference between the terms. "Cis-gender" refers to gender identity, whilst "straight" refers to sexual orientation. You don't have to agree with those things. Nevertheless, in the original definition of those words, a gay person can be cis-gender and a straight person can be trans-gender. The words aren't interchangeable and therefore it wouldn't work just fine.
@@kilimi7710 Thanks. I guess I don't understand how someone knows he feels like a woman unless it involves sexual orientation. What does it even mean to identify as a woman?
@@Batosai11489That's the exact question I'm trying to figure out right now. I'm having a serious existential crisis and also an identity crisis myself. All that I know is that feeling like a woman/man and being sexually attracted to women/men is only partially interrelated. Hencewhy most women (cis or trans) are attracted to men (and vice versa) but the few women who are attracted to women are somehow still identifying as women. But interestingly gay women/men tend to have the communication styles of the opposite gender and other things, like CP stated in the talk. So massive confusion on my side. Maybe I'll come to findings in this topic in the future but right now I have pretty much no clue. Also I myself don't know how it feels like to be a certain gender, I just magically feel "masculine". I can't put my finger on why I feel like a man. With my comment before I just wanted to specify the terms.
USA neeeds «MORE PARTIES». Paglia says, 1:03:50 - 1:04:04, because having just «the two» makes politics into a bland porrage, so we meed «drastic reform of PARTY STRUCTURE». But what it boils down to is reforming the election. In USA the election is ‘for presiden’, while in Europe the election is ‘FOR A RULING PARTY’. In the latter most coallitions can be finalized AFTER the election, whereas in the former they need to be finalized BEFORE each election. So what it boils down to is reforming «election for president» into «election for a ruling party», which is a drastic reform of PROCESS structure, not reform of party structure. The latter is a natural consequence of the former, and can only come through the former.
It bothers me to see those who cling to feminism even while admitting it's flawed and even opposing their views. ...like there's no alternative to equality...
I really want to know, if they could be a lot more specific, what exactly do women want to be able to do or think or say that they currently are not able to?? I saw in one episode of a series on Netflix ("Scandal"), a scene of a woman running for president, and she was being interviewed, and she was introduced as "a true Cinderella success story, and here we are in her home to see..." and the candidate was offended, she said she resented the reporter for presenting her like that and doing the interview in her kitchen and putting in the background homely things... she ranted about "this is not how I spend my day, this is not the way my home looks on a normal day..." she called that structural sexism and other nasty catch phrases.... I'm confused by that, because the same is done to men all the time, a man would look weak and feminine in that setting for example, and and there is no precise setting a candidate is supposed to be interviewed.... Do women want to redo or modify language itself from its roots?? that is just not possible, language evolution or advancement is organic, if something works IN LANGUAGE, is almost immediately assimilated by society, and society is driven towards stability, specially in political power circles.... so unless women say to these situations "We know it doesn't work like that, but we gotta start SOMEPLACE sometime!!" Is that it?? Anyhow, my confusion persists as I think of situations like these, and I can't seem to understand the problem. Any comments on this topic would be appreciated.
"I'm calling for men to take control of their own lives again." - Camille Paglia, Feminist.
There should really be a lot more people like her. Camille is a feminist, but she has really earned my respect, simply for being actually for equality, not equity, and not female supremacy.
Jeff Bridges ally together and speak out as often as possible
this woman is an absolute treasure
She's a total bore.
Boring? Even a fool can appear wise if he keeps his mouth shut.
maybe she can talk some sense into liberal lefty feminists
jaye see i bet you're a bore
"I'm calling for middle class girls to stop asking for special protections. It's up to women themselves to understand the dangers of the world and not expect the world to be an extention of their protected comfortable middle-class living room." Brilliant.
A unique and brilliant thinker coming at you at 100 miles per hour... fantastic.
This woman is an absolute force to be reckoned with.
THIS is what well educated people are. Not to be fucked with.
No, she's not. She's just another academic pendulum swinger
One of the truest, most reliable intellectual voices regarding our culture.
Few can touch her.
Im a Camille Paglia feminist. Thank god for this woman.
Jessica I an MRA. But I believed we need more women like her. He wave of feminist I can work with side by side any day. Unlike this third wave feminist.
I wouldn't be surprised if someone eventually coined the term "Paglian Feminist". It has a nice ring to it.
wanna go on a date? It's wierd out there
... kidding.
I've heard of Camille but never listened to her until recently
She's quirky and brilliant. Love her!
"Why aren't you more outraged??"
She's great, and even for me as a male an absolute role model.
Same.
Based. Men can learn a lot from women. I have. My own mother has a lot in common with Camille in the sense that she's always been "gender non-conforming" (for lack of a better word) while also being very loving and caring. She's always been more assertive and ambitious than my dad lol, so in a lot of ways I picked up on the essences of manhood from watching my mom as opposed to my phlegmatic, almost manchild-like dad.
Anyway yes I think if it were more acceptable for Gen Z women to have the kind of wisdom, sense, and strength of character that Camille Paglia does, I think men and women would be on better terms. Instead we have identity politics and "yasssss queen I'm queerrrrr, I'm fierceeee" and black-and-white thinking.
THE GODDES OF INTELLECTULITY: CAMILLE PAGLIA.My intellectual independence came when I read her books.I am your number one fan in Brazil: Fabio Veroneze
She advocates full political and social equality for men and women
Red Shift ... she's not Jesus Christ
"Any man who abuses or denigrates women is showing a weakness which comes from some inner-sense he has for women's overwhelming power."
We shouldn't abuse anybody. But denigration? Who's to say denigrating another person has anything to do with her gender?
+gherrrie she isn´t anti religion
+gherrrie+
Do folks like you (religious cranks) troll RUclips just to look for an opening to drop your turds into conversations that have NOTHING to do at all with religion?
Please find another hobby, maybe something truly worth while, like ... teach someone to read, help the homeless, help out at soup kitchens, help the disabled, volunteer at children's hospitals ...
29:50 - call for men to redefine themselves and take ownership for themselves
42:27 - up to women to stand up for themselves and not expect the world to be an extension of their living room
Camille Paglia is the hero that women needed, yet the feminist who was forgotten and discarded for weak women like Gloria Steinem.
Make sense, I suppose. The young people is all about anarchy though, you'd think that they'd take Camille Paglia as their rebel role model.
anti-semitic beliefs like yours are repulsive.
Saying that Jewish people own a lot of things is anti-semitic? Last I checked, it means treating Jewish people with hostility and unfairness. When did this happen?
Ted C jewish people collude and put unnecessarily higher value on other jews over Americans. Wake up Ted C stop being so politically correct.
Such an empathetic intelectual humanitarian. A true pioneer and trailblazer! What a gift she is!
"Its up to women themselves to protect themselves", very good. Extension of the idea that the best way to deal with bullying is to offer self defense. She is putting her finger on something really important and apparently unknown to modern people, namely, that freedom and risk are interwoven.
Important statement! Thanx
It's up to women to protect themselves by forming a government that protects it's citizens.
Women “doing life together rings true”. I miss this in my own life, my mother is deceased and I have no sisters, or female in-laws living close. I’m most happy when I’m with my young adult daughter’s just chatting and spending time together.
She is my Goddess. Period. I love her.
Kate Justice AMEN!!
Is your name actually "justice"?
I think Paglia and Peterson are cut from the same cloth so to speak. Tons of overlap, this is a hell of a video.
Peterson for young men, Paglia for young women.
roamer
Does Paglia have much of a young following?
Peterson and Paglia have an interview together that is particularly good.
I personally think Paglia has remained unspoiled, meanwhile JP has begun to sour to me over time.
Yes. As I understand, they have kind of a similar family heritage ("working class" if you will), are self-made man/woman and both have got to know all parts of society during their working lifes. Their thoughts are original and bear a lot of truth in them because they first look at reality and then apply or reject theories based on that. Not like many professors of today who first learn a theory/ideology and then with a big amount of ignorance try to squeeze and adjust reality to their preferred theory. Paglia and Peterson represent to a much greater extent the spirit of the original universal scholars who embody the essence of what a university is - or rather: should be.
I love Camille.. I'm so glad she came out with a new book, maybe that's why she was quiet in 2016.
I'm glad she's back.
Thanks for mentioning this, which I will be sure to read.
Wish we could see and hear more of the audience. I love her audience reactions. She's comedy gold.
I saw the women altogether all day in Spain when I was a kid. The men had their world, too. It really was better.
I love this woman. I love how she is teaching women that power and freedom comes with responsibility.
Loved this talk, and esp the Q & A. I recently saw her conversation with Jordan Peterson, it's one of the most eye opening conversations I've ever listened to. Two intellectual giants, for sure.
I could listen to the wisdom of the emperess of women all day
agreed … but she doesn't just speak for wo-men … she speaks for men as well .. she speaks for all of us .. if we've got any sense at all .. we should listen
Always wise, she is getting wiser.
Is that even possibe?
When Camille can not become any wiser, she'll finally ditch "feminism" altogether, forever, and let us know that it is indeed CANCER.
It'll be a very sad day when Camille Paglia is no longer with us. She deserves much more recognition than Steinem, Huffington, etc.
I consider that Camille Paglia represents a refreshing and original narrative with which I can find great affinities.
This woman is absolutely brilliant!! I love everything that comes out of her mouth/brain. She should be doing speaking tours of college campuses around the western world.
Love the libertarian chick at the end. Sensible. Clear-minded. Strong. Nobody's victim. And Camille hit the ball out of the park, as usual. These are people to get "excited about" --independent thinkers with some actual philosophical grounding, aside from cheap political stuffing.
I love Camille from dawn until sundown, but will call her out on her biggest weakness: her atheism. It's a damaging bit of cant, on her part.
A well-argued agnostic stance would be smarter for her body of work, in terms of logistics: she will die and be known as an atheist. And there's nothing so insufferable as an atheist ... aside from a wig-wacking fundamentalist ... and those two disparate creatures are frighteningly alike.
But I love the way her mind works. I wish our universities were filled with minds like this. Our kids would THRIVE with perceptive thinkers like her.
All hail, Camille, and I mean it.
Jonathan Kieran it's fun to watch atheists and fundamentalists evangelize and/or crusade against each other!
Nobody’s victim. Well said.
you cant be serious, what would she need a simplistic control mechanism like religon for?
She's more religious than most people who call themselves religious
I'm an atheist.
Paglia is so underestimated, her work is very worthwile studying, but it takes time!
Right before Winston and Julia gets caught by the thought police in 1984 Winston goes into an entire dialogue about a Pole woman. How strong and sturdy she was. How powerful her voice was and much respect she demanded. He referred to her as the future. That never made any sense to me until listening to this.
Of all things that one can admire Camille Paglia for and there are many, the importance she places on Freedom of Speech is the most admirable.
I'll be getting a copy of that new book. I've missed quite a few of her essays.
Boom! 4 minutes 23 seconds. 40:32-44:55 Power to Camille! You are the shit.
One thing I wish she'd point out more. Is how men form relationships with other men as well. One thing we've noticed in studying is that men form longer lasting friendships with other men. While female relationships don't last as long for women in being friends with women. Men I theorize had to form these bonds to other men because of the nature of being a hunter, and a warrior. You had to trust them, with your life. We form these close bonds that don't die easily. Also that men don't have to say as much they say much more via body language. We can tell a story with looks rather than words.
pretty good points here … men have always been more club-able … wo-men tend more to bitch … men just have this emotional honesty … guess if U're facing a wild bear or a fierce tiger a bit of honesty helps … trouble with wo-men is this emotional dishonesty .. wo-men don't really do rules … never have .. never will .. tends to be every gall for herself
You are seeing this within the constraints of a patriarchy where women are pitted against each other as a sort of divisive political act. Also, I communicate with other women with far less words than men require from me. You are making observation from a fishbowl.
Fast forward 2022 “Camille, we need you”!
She is FABULOUS! FABULOUS! FABULOUS!!!
Great video, thanks for posting!
What a brilliant woman, don't agree with her on all of it but she is a really useful voice for all of us.
shes right about psychological dislocation today... i think we need to venerate money and corporate work less, and spend some more time growing salads, doing the laundry by hand... maybe all students could take some months off and work on a small farm ... eg south of france... working outdoors is grounding.
Great lecture and interesting dialogue with audience members. Listening to her has wakened up my dormant brain. I’ve ordered the book.
42:26 YES YES YES. PREACH CAMILLE PREACH!
One question I'd have for feminists who claim women and men are the same is, "Then what is trans? If you change from one thing to another that is identical, what is that change?". I've encountered a similar question from Jordan Peterson, "If women and men are the same, what are the hormones for?". It would be very interesting to hear what Camille Paglia thinks about such subjects, both from her statement that gender studies needs to incorporate biology, and that she considers herself "trans" in some way that did not require hormones.
On point! Rejection of historical narratives absolutely underminds any progress made by marginalized people. This is why we have witnessed such a paradoxical regression in so called " progressivism" If civilization denies its growing pains and violent origins through hundreds of thousands of years of trial and error, how exactly do we measure progress? Consciousness is transcendent and transformative. Thanks Camille for steering us toward a renaissance instead of a new dark age. Been there, done that!!! Mad love.
i wonder if her books have been released as audio-books, if they got her to narrate them they'd be about an hour long, each.
yes! two of them have, not narrated by the author though :-(
THANK YOU!!!!!
I usually watch this stuff at 1.25x or 1.5x, but this is better watched at 0.75x. she still sounds normal!
" Women fight blizzards too."
- sis gendered guy in grey shirt at 33.
Jane Madison its not a guy it's a woman
She's one of the only people speaking on the absolute brilliance/talent of Madonna, seeing her as one of the most impactful, influential women of the 20th century, in so many important ways.
madonna has gone full SJW she isnt brilliant shes just another sheep following the SJW herd.
Stan Boyd You completely missed my point. Also, the overuse/misuse of the term SJW is exhausting.
what other term is more appropriate than sjw? i wont use liberal because i consider myself to be a liberal and i dont buy into this ideology. I wont refer to them as "the left" like Ben Shapiro does since I still consider myself left wing. I wont call them feminists because they are not looking for equal rights for women, they are looking for special privileges for women and people of color as well as muslims (almost forgot transtrenders), and they have made the straight white male the enemy.
Coke head whore pushed by elites.
Thanks for the upload! Camille is always a delight.
Love Ms PAGLIA!! Always RAISING HELL!
talked a lot and everything she said was spot on … I cant think of anyone who can do that
A friend of mine is a retired stock broker. And he was telling me that there is no classes on money and how to handle it any more in the US. No wonder credit debt has hit over a trillion dollars now.
pitty cassie didn't interview camille for 'the red pill'
I have an intellectual crush on this woman.
6 years ago! More relevant now than ever.
this is bloody great
coz its the bloody truth .. the bloody UNVARNISHED truth
It's refreshing to hear a moderate leftist speak.
A remarkable Woman, a beacon of intellect and common sense.
One of the big mysteries, how someone cam do an hour talk on 1 breath. :D
I love her mind!
Someone should have asked her a question about the Islam and how it is dominating.
This individual is such a genius.
I LOVE CAMILLE PAGLIA!
I'd like to hear her challenged on first wave feminism.
Red Shift Oh, give it a rest already. Nobody of consequence cares if about the MGTOW movement. Ya'll are a bunch of closet cases anyway. Grow up.
good for you red shift hope you enjoy dying alone with no family by your side. You're just a male version of a crazy cat lady, or an old maid.
Also just out of curiousity, does your tinfoil hat make your head itch?
if MGTOW becomes the new thing for all men like you claim above then the human race is finished. MGTOW is just another loud vocal minority just like feminists and equally as preachy and annoying. I think I'll stay with my family thanks.
Well if IQ is entirely genetic I am sorry that your parents passed thier bad genes on you.
What the hell is sis gender guy?! Good god what utter nonsense!
She is a national treasure
Can someone cut out the SJW at 32:58 and repost separately? It would be nice to post just him to illustrate what in fact an SJW is . I am not computer literate enough to do that.... maybe I could google how to? Otherwise, I have just discovered Camille Paglia and am very impressed! I think she and Toronto's Jordan Peterson would make for a highly entertaining and thought provoking event!
Marymary Millidweeb SJW = social justice warrior. They like to shout down anyone who disagree with their option.
"Do we want to understand ourselves as human beings or not?"
Im a hardcore post modernist Communist and I love this analysis!
By the way read Sexual Personae . It is so engrossing !
intelligence is so underrated
She has strong opinions.
camille: the bubble-machine of the triggering
Thank God my daughter still has some role models
I love this woman
The biggest obstacle to women in the workplace are other women.
would love to hear camille speak out uniting Libertarians and Progressives via Ralph Naders writings
Freedom for all people. A separation of our true selves from politics. True autonomy of personae for all people. Harmony with nature. Her perspective on how Trump won. Education to encourage entrepreneurs. What a fresh perspective. Seldom do I hear a voice that does not echo so many others.
16:33 brilliant observation. i saw that, too. I thought it was odd.
Dude at 33:00 makes my gaydar go klang-klang-klang!
Gay at 33:00 makes my dudedar go silent
ordered the wit and wisdom of Oscar Wilde because of this talk. 2.70 primw shipping. not bad cheaper than starbucks black.
that's a start …. Oscar Wilde called out the hypocrisies of his age … liberal lefties are full of stinking hypocrisies + stupid intolerances that need called out NOW
Wow she is very impressive.
She is a real feminist
Amazing woman. So switched on.
I agree that women want to be with other women, we are starving for it. I think that's one reason why Taylor Swift has become so hugely popular among younger women, it's a chance for them to be together and enjoy themselves.
Demand for equality of treatment demonstrates that we are in fact not equal otherwise there would be no need for the permission seeking. That said, we should all be treated with reciprocity. Equality isn’t a stable position because people are not actually equal but reciprocity is a demonstrable measure of interaction that can be adjudicated scientifically in value neutral language.
Which are the names that she mentions at the end?
Read Barjavel « ravage » and « la nuit des temps » (the Ice people )
Camille I just want to comment that it is so nice to actually be able to understand what you're saying because you slowed you are speaking down by like 50%, which also cut down on the stammering I'm sure that was very hard for you so as a member of your listening audience I wanted to say thank you! I love everything you say but usually have trouble listening.
Pirates! Thanks Ed, Rob
I love this lady that's a real feminist
Completely mad but brilliant. I love her,
Why doesn't anyone ever talk about the woman who didn't want to vote or end slavery???
What's stopping you?
very important speech
it might just save the fucking planet … if U can get any of the liberal lefties to listen
Love her
Absolutely brilliant.... I feel cheated to have just now stumbled upon her. Imagine a baby boomer trans female feminist who holds dearly the SAME values a white cis male. And that's what makes us Americans.
Can we please get rid of the term "cis-gendered"? "Straight" works just fine.
agreed … when straight people start calling themselves cis-gendered U know we're done for
normal has always worked
You fail to see the difference between the terms. "Cis-gender" refers to gender identity, whilst "straight" refers to sexual orientation. You don't have to agree with those things. Nevertheless, in the original definition of those words, a gay person can be cis-gender and a straight person can be trans-gender. The words aren't interchangeable and therefore it wouldn't work just fine.
@@kilimi7710 Thanks. I guess I don't understand how someone knows he feels like a woman unless it involves sexual orientation. What does it even mean to identify as a woman?
@@Batosai11489That's the exact question I'm trying to figure out right now. I'm having a serious existential crisis and also an identity crisis myself. All that I know is that feeling like a woman/man and being sexually attracted to women/men is only partially interrelated. Hencewhy most women (cis or trans) are attracted to men (and vice versa) but the few women who are attracted to women are somehow still identifying as women. But interestingly gay women/men tend to have the communication styles of the opposite gender and other things, like CP stated in the talk. So massive confusion on my side. Maybe I'll come to findings in this topic in the future but right now I have pretty much no clue.
Also I myself don't know how it feels like to be a certain gender, I just magically feel "masculine". I can't put my finger on why I feel like a man.
With my comment before I just wanted to specify the terms.
USA neeeds «MORE PARTIES». Paglia says, 1:03:50 - 1:04:04, because having just «the two» makes politics into a bland porrage, so we meed «drastic reform of PARTY STRUCTURE». But what it boils down to is reforming the election. In USA the election is ‘for presiden’, while in Europe the election is ‘FOR A RULING PARTY’. In the latter most coallitions can be finalized AFTER the election, whereas in the former they need to be finalized BEFORE each election. So what it boils down to is reforming «election for president» into «election for a ruling party», which is a drastic reform of PROCESS structure, not reform of party structure. The latter is a natural consequence of the former, and can only come through the former.
It bothers me to see those who cling to feminism even while admitting it's flawed and even opposing their views.
...like there's no alternative to equality...
I really want to know, if they could be a lot more specific, what exactly do women want to be able to do or think or say that they currently are not able to??
I saw in one episode of a series on Netflix ("Scandal"), a scene of a woman running for president, and she was being interviewed, and she was introduced as "a true Cinderella success story, and here we are in her home to see..."
and the candidate was offended, she said she resented the reporter for presenting her like that and doing the interview in her kitchen and putting in the background homely things... she ranted about "this is not how I spend my day, this is not the way my home looks on a normal day..." she called that structural sexism and other nasty catch phrases....
I'm confused by that, because the same is done to men all the time, a man would look weak and feminine in that setting for example, and and there is no precise setting a candidate is supposed to be interviewed....
Do women want to redo or modify language itself from its roots?? that is just not possible, language evolution or advancement is organic, if something works IN LANGUAGE, is almost immediately assimilated by society, and society is driven towards stability, specially in political power circles.... so unless women say to these situations "We know it doesn't work like that, but we gotta start SOMEPLACE sometime!!" Is that it??
Anyhow, my confusion persists as I think of situations like these, and I can't seem to understand the problem.
Any comments on this topic would be appreciated.