EASA Warns Of Potential Airbus A380 Fuselage Gaps

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 фев 2024
  • The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has warned that there might be potential gaps in the fuselages of certain Airbus A380 aircraft - an issue which could reduce the structural integrity of the jet. The regulator issued its final-rule airworthiness directive (AD) on January 31st, 2024, which includes instructions for operators on addressing the potentially unsafe condition.
    Article: simpleflying.com/easa-airbus-...
    Our Social Media:
    / simpleflyingnews
    / simple_flying
    / simpleflyingnews
    Our Website
    simpleflying.com/
    For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 87

  • @whitemailprivilege2830
    @whitemailprivilege2830 4 месяца назад +63

    Thank you for this prompt update. I will go out front to visually inspect my A380.

    • @Tpr_1808
      @Tpr_1808 4 месяца назад +4

      By the way I might need to borrow it

    • @_msraviation
      @_msraviation 4 месяца назад +3

      same

    • @JensSchraeder
      @JensSchraeder 4 месяца назад

      Thankfully I just sold mine

  • @phillm156
    @phillm156 4 месяца назад +46

    Just cannot let Boeing have all the fun??

  • @cabottaxi
    @cabottaxi 4 месяца назад +44

    Great to hear this just 3 days before I embark on 2 x 380 flights.

    • @Overlordvoldermort
      @Overlordvoldermort 4 месяца назад +1

      Can’t be worse than the crew scheduled to fly on these planes

  • @Rasscasse
    @Rasscasse 4 месяца назад +6

    Thanks for the info SF

  • @Kaijuus
    @Kaijuus 4 месяца назад +155

    EASA vs. FAA, the difference can't be clearer. Preventionary vs. Reactionary.

    • @EuropeanRailfanAlt
      @EuropeanRailfanAlt 4 месяца назад +24

      Europeans are better lol

    • @landryl0908
      @landryl0908 4 месяца назад +13

      You probably are not in the aviation industry.

    • @FlyByWire1
      @FlyByWire1 4 месяца назад +19

      The FAA issues warning airworthiness directives just like this all the time that instruct airlines to inspect aircraft for the potential issue or any early signs of it occurring.

  • @_msraviation
    @_msraviation 4 месяца назад +35

    id imagine emirates isnt too thrilled

    • @rscott2247
      @rscott2247 4 месяца назад +9

      But has Emirates actually had any issues with their A380's fleet ?

    • @michaelgoetze2103
      @michaelgoetze2103 4 месяца назад +9

      Since there aren't any aircraft close to the stated limit, inspections can be done during normal maintenance cycles.

  • @wasted-blaster.
    @wasted-blaster. 4 месяца назад +7

    How many spare parts are still available for this aircraft given the fact it is no longer in production?

    • @AnotherPointOfView944
      @AnotherPointOfView944 4 месяца назад +18

      I dont know for sure, but the manufacturer is probably contractually obliged to supply spares for X number of years after the aircraft itself is no longer being made. This is normal practice for very many industries.

    • @SAYYAM55
      @SAYYAM55 4 месяца назад +6

      Many critical areas of the A380 production line are still present (gathering dust mostly) for exactly this reason.

  • @aviationfromnaman
    @aviationfromnaman 4 месяца назад

    Great

  • @Vinnie417.
    @Vinnie417. 4 месяца назад +1

    Nice

  • @TGAlphaCaptions
    @TGAlphaCaptions 4 месяца назад +2

    hmmm

  • @user-xo4qu6wd9g
    @user-xo4qu6wd9g 4 месяца назад

    They like no.47 similar to the A340-600 fr.47

  • @sheriff2077
    @sheriff2077 4 месяца назад +15

    Ever since the Alaska max incident all i hear about is just missing or falsely installed parts in all types of aircrafts

    • @aerialbugsmasher
      @aerialbugsmasher 4 месяца назад +9

      cool story bro. Stick to greyhound then

    • @NBLCGBLN
      @NBLCGBLN 4 месяца назад +2

      @@aerialbugsmasher lmao!

    • @Shark_Bricks
      @Shark_Bricks 4 месяца назад +2

      So True!

    • @stickynorth
      @stickynorth 4 месяца назад +1

      MOSTLY Boeing... Be honest...

    • @Adumzzinthehouse
      @Adumzzinthehouse 4 месяца назад

      @@stickynorthNot really, the A380 possible gaps, the A350 paint issue, engine issues on A220 and A321N meanwhile Boeings and Embraer have the same engine but with little to zero problems.

  • @user-jq2rf4nf3o
    @user-jq2rf4nf3o 4 месяца назад

    Epoxi shim time
    Like Bondo but structural

  • @will891410
    @will891410 4 месяца назад +9

    Nothing that duct tape wouldnt fix.

  • @BeastMode-nm5wr
    @BeastMode-nm5wr 2 месяца назад

    But but but the media said Boeing bad airbus good 😂😂😂

  • @0611930024838
    @0611930024838 4 месяца назад +2

    sounds expensive

  • @troll4898
    @troll4898 4 месяца назад +8

    Nickoliver gonna be happy

    • @Rasscasse
      @Rasscasse 4 месяца назад +4

      Oh god yeah. He will love this won’t he!
      Strange man he is. If 10 Maxs fell out of the sky tomorrow, he would still defend Boeing.
      Maybe secretly it’s Mullenberger or Calhoun eh?

    • @nickolliver3021
      @nickolliver3021 4 месяца назад +1

      Attention seeker for sure!

    • @troll4898
      @troll4898 4 месяца назад +1

      @@nickolliver3021 THE LEGEND HAS BEEN SUMMONED

    • @nickolliver3021
      @nickolliver3021 4 месяца назад

      @@troll4898 FROM THE ATTENTION SEEKER!

    • @maxsaviation9512
      @maxsaviation9512 4 месяца назад +1

      @@nickolliver3021The Boeing god has been summoned! (you)

  • @dennisalexanderreilly8624
    @dennisalexanderreilly8624 4 месяца назад

    Boeing: Thank you Jesus, it's not about us

  • @JensSchraeder
    @JensSchraeder 4 месяца назад

    Just put some JB weld on the cracks.

  • @well-blazeredman6187
    @well-blazeredman6187 4 месяца назад +5

    Cripes - but I'm still loving that Etihad livery.

  • @Brian-ui1bq
    @Brian-ui1bq 4 месяца назад +1

    Lol

  • @bikingmoments
    @bikingmoments 4 месяца назад +10

    Gap is better than unbolted door plug…

    • @filledwithvariousknowledge2747
      @filledwithvariousknowledge2747 4 месяца назад +10

      Worse actually

    • @FlyByWire1
      @FlyByWire1 4 месяца назад +7

      I think they’re all bad but more importantly, it shows that mishaps can happen during manufacturing and it doesn’t necessarily mean that the plane is dangerous or the company doesn’t care.

  • @amritbasavaraj9146
    @amritbasavaraj9146 4 месяца назад +39

    Guess who is the supplier of fuselage for AirBus? Spirit Aero systems. Think it's high time they shut shop.

    • @thenome3156
      @thenome3156 4 месяца назад +8

      The fuselage for the A380 was built in France and Germany

    • @amritbasavaraj9146
      @amritbasavaraj9146 4 месяца назад

      @@thenome3156 Yes bud Spirit Aero systems have factories in Europe

    • @derlordonesin
      @derlordonesin 4 месяца назад +2

      Spirit builds wing components for the A380, not the fuselage.

  • @mamaferry1282
    @mamaferry1282 4 месяца назад

    ❤arrête de me fatiguer merci bisous

  • @drizzlgaming9952
    @drizzlgaming9952 4 месяца назад +3

    1st?

  • @danielderiecroft4948
    @danielderiecroft4948 4 месяца назад

    Ground the damn things

  • @waynemerlo7448
    @waynemerlo7448 4 месяца назад +32

    Still Id fly Airbus anytime over Boeing.

    • @fomfom9779
      @fomfom9779 4 месяца назад +9

      Spirit Aerosystems supplies numerous flight critical plane components to Airbus. Including fuselage barrels ,and wing spars, on the A-350.

    • @jeruelnathan1845
      @jeruelnathan1845 4 месяца назад +4

      @@fomfom9779yeah but the Alaska incident was not spirit’s fault, also the systems spirit builds for Airbus is based in Europe not in US

    • @fomfom9779
      @fomfom9779 4 месяца назад +2

      @@jeruelnathan1845 It is yet to be determined if Spirit's employees, who were reworking the fuselage rivets at Boeing's Renton, facility were responsible for the removal and re-installation of the door plug. Spirit designed the A-350 fuselage barrels, which are manufactured in Kingston, NC.

    • @FlyByWire1
      @FlyByWire1 4 месяца назад +2

      @@jeruelnathan1845it doesn’t really matter where it’s based. It’s the same company with the same management. All the operations are controlled from their home base in Kansas.

    • @fomfom9779
      @fomfom9779 4 месяца назад +2

      @@FlyByWire1 Exactly. And per news reports, Spirit states, in its stockholders financial reports, that it's losing money on its Airbus operations. So anybody thinks they aren't going to try to economize on the production of those items, is fooling themselves. Unless they go back to Airbus, asking for more money. Good luck with that one.

  • @TheRuben_music
    @TheRuben_music 4 месяца назад

    At least they arent doing what Boeing is doing.

  • @NicholasJohnson57
    @NicholasJohnson57 4 месяца назад +12

    This is clearly all Boeings fault.

  • @oldcynic6964
    @oldcynic6964 4 месяца назад +1

    0:09 "There might be potential gaps...." Sounds like another bunch of bureaucrats trying to justify their existence.

  • @MarceloTrindade1
    @MarceloTrindade1 4 месяца назад +7

    Interesting how Airbus decided to be transparent with its "quality escapes" now. Of course they knew this fault from the beginning. Suddenly, afraid to have this secret exposed, decided to ask EASA to give the bad news to the customers...

    • @smoketinytom
      @smoketinytom 4 месяца назад +2

      Airbus issued this back in October 2023. Note sure why SF is only picking up on it now.

  • @janwitts2688
    @janwitts2688 4 месяца назад +1

    Could be.. potential.. rumoured...
    Unlike boeing
    Are... certainly... faulty..

  • @grtitann7425
    @grtitann7425 4 месяца назад +1

    Report sponsored aka bribed, by Boeing😂

    • @samuel4833
      @samuel4833 4 месяца назад +1

      My thoughts too, they just never want to accept defeat

    • @filledwithvariousknowledge2747
      @filledwithvariousknowledge2747 4 месяца назад +1

      If you actually think that then your beyond help in society

    • @grtitann7425
      @grtitann7425 4 месяца назад

      @@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 I guess that you haven't seen what they have done with the FAA.. 😂

    • @Adumzzinthehouse
      @Adumzzinthehouse 4 месяца назад

      Airbus didn’t want to address the issue themselves so they waited for the EASA to address it. Don’t ask me how I know 🤫

  • @stickynorth
    @stickynorth 4 месяца назад +1

    This still has nothing on the Boeing sitch... YIKES!