Official explains how NATO would respond to possible Russian nuclear strike

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
  • CNN's John Berman speaks with Major Mike Lyons (Ret.) about Russia's threat to use tactical nuclear weapons how NATO may respond. #CNN #News

Комментарии • 2,9 тыс.

  • @mattyjay8896
    @mattyjay8896 Год назад +1321

    You know the world is upsidedown when the word nuclear war doesn't freak you out anymore.

    • @gerardflynn3899
      @gerardflynn3899 Год назад +35

      Compared to the 1980s, I agree

    • @Batman-vr6jp
      @Batman-vr6jp Год назад +12

      Yaas.... It's because of the knowledge

    • @jamiethompson3851
      @jamiethompson3851 Год назад +44

      They should just take him out someone close to him the troops don't even want to fight

    • @thilomanten8701
      @thilomanten8701 Год назад +15

      Read "On Thermonuclear War" by Khan amd have a look at the so-called escalation ladder, we are still "only" at 12 out of 40+steps!

    • @guynorth3277
      @guynorth3277 Год назад

      The Hell it don't, no one with be unscathed!!! What is wrong with fools like Putin to even think of going there, he so needs to go now!!!

  • @markshepherd9153
    @markshepherd9153 Год назад +212

    When nuclear conflict is discussed like Monday Night Football post game analysis😞

  • @nysewerrat6577
    @nysewerrat6577 Год назад +67

    Remember that Japanese reporter who asked Putin about a potential nuclear war and got mocked for it? Guess he was right after all.

    • @user-ww3pp1xw5g
      @user-ww3pp1xw5g Год назад +1

      Remember that Japaneese journalists who asked USA why they used nuke on civilian city? No ... cuz there was no journalism at the west.

    • @rongeorge574
      @rongeorge574 Год назад

      @@user-ww3pp1xw5g Japan was publicly saying they were willing to lose 100million people to stop Japan from being invaded, so killing a few hundred thousand saved 100 million lives

    • @user-ww3pp1xw5g
      @user-ww3pp1xw5g Год назад

      @@rongeorge574 The question is, who willing invade Japan, ever?
      As far as i know things are opposite, Japan is militarictic agressor, who ivaded all the countries around it whole history.

  • @OBDPVCR
    @OBDPVCR Год назад +65

    This conversation is insane.

    • @corygriffiths4394
      @corygriffiths4394 Год назад

      It really is but we’ve been here twice before back during the Cuban Missile Crisis and in 1983 with Able Archer.

    • @howardbaxter2514
      @howardbaxter2514 Год назад

      @@corygriffiths4394 yes, but do we want to have this conversation again? Remember how close we got? We were a single push of a button away from nuclear annihilation. One person decides not to trust their gut and we are all screwed.

  • @Lekikna
    @Lekikna Год назад +406

    I can’t believe that we live in the world where we have to seriously discuss the nukes

    • @karadan100
      @karadan100 Год назад

      Unfortunately people like Putin and countries like Russia exist.

    • @trainmaster0217
      @trainmaster0217 Год назад +32

      What's so hard about it? I see our world deteriorating all around me every day. I kinda expect it now. Nothing new anymore.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +1

      Hello ❤

    • @tommygun5038
      @tommygun5038 Год назад +9

      They're all to cavalier about it. It's like they want or expect it to happen. Strange.

    • @moosesnWoop
      @moosesnWoop Год назад

      we don't - CNN is fear mongering. Putin never said anything about using nukes lmao - guess that's what happens when they censor you, have to listen to these fearmongers.

  • @jacobhughes9010
    @jacobhughes9010 Год назад +23

    How casual nuclear war is talked about is insane

    • @tomarsandbeyond
      @tomarsandbeyond Год назад +1

      How the heck were they supposed to talk about it.?

    • @mikeh497
      @mikeh497 Год назад

      What a bunch of twit's.One thing Russian's don't do.Is give in!!

    • @Learn-from-me-you-shits
      @Learn-from-me-you-shits 10 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@tomarsandbeyondby wearing masks

  • @JeromeKJones
    @JeromeKJones Год назад +2

    He never explained how NATO would respond. Time wasted.

  • @flying-fijiantv6282
    @flying-fijiantv6282 Год назад +24

    This is sad man..we just barely got over this covid lockdown stuff and now we are in threat of a nuclear war. Our leaders are continuing to fail us...i just hope everything turns out alright for everyone and i pray noone has to shed blood or tears for their family member(s) dying may GOD bless you all.

    • @user-jz7hu6qo7y
      @user-jz7hu6qo7y Год назад +3

      fr i just want to live and be happy :(

    • @Fabio-Galante
      @Fabio-Galante Год назад +3

      @@user-jz7hu6qo7y There is nothing you can do about it , live happy until they start dropping , fuck it

    • @MrDetroit1701
      @MrDetroit1701 Год назад +2

      Don't worry that'll knock out Covid19!

    • @freakyarmy6958
      @freakyarmy6958 Год назад +1

      I lost all hope in humanity and life I’ve just accepted my fate if a nuclear war happened I would accept my fate

    • @gojuryu6775
      @gojuryu6775 11 месяцев назад

      That is what happens when you have a overthrow of the government. When it take 20000 members of the National Guard to protect you ~ then you did not win the election.

  • @bigtex4058
    @bigtex4058 Год назад +105

    How will NATO respond? I watched this and still don't know.

    • @AtrueservantofAllah
      @AtrueservantofAllah Год назад +10

      independence for Texas republic

    • @kylereese4822
      @kylereese4822 Год назад +19

      You don't tell your opponent your course of action... that`s why he never said anything.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +10

      They won’t respond until they’re provoked

    • @moosesnWoop
      @moosesnWoop Год назад

      It's CNN, bottomfeeders of note. This is fear mongering - utter BS

    • @seebanff7865
      @seebanff7865 Год назад

      Dear People's Republic of China:
      Out of courtesy and decency, let us inform you that...
      NATO members including USA, UK, and France are on high alert and currently watching or spying for any Russia nuclear system movements. Not because we are fearful, but to be alert and know when or if we pull the nuclear triggers as a response.
      We wouldn't want to mistakenly make Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland, accidentally.
      That only happens if we need to, intentionally.
      So it is entirely on weak and pathetic Putin if he chooses the path of nuclear destruction and makes Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland as his legacy, if that is what he wishes for.
      Don't worry. Although downwind from a Russia nuclear wasteland, I'm sure People's Republic of China will do just fine.
      Sincerely and Respectfully,
      NATO. All for one and one for all.
      PS. We still don't care about Russia Mir referendums and Russia claims of annexation in Ukraine, or anywhere actually.
      BTW. We almost forgot....
      Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
      Putin Huilo 😂
      Russia Mir gavno 💩

  • @CitiesTurnedToDust
    @CitiesTurnedToDust Год назад +242

    the weird part for me is the implication that there might also be no response to them using nukes whatsoever.

    • @mpalfadel2008
      @mpalfadel2008 Год назад +104

      Not responding to the use of nukes doesn’t make the world safer
      It would only ensure the continued use of nukes
      If Putin uses nukes, nato will/must respond

    • @marioluigi9599
      @marioluigi9599 Год назад

      Well the response should be a wiping out of all of Russia's military and government. Then a colonisation of the country for about 100 years

    • @bustercheeks4116
      @bustercheeks4116 Год назад

      Yeah we should send a few backs, fuck the environment and all those back WEST winded. (AMERICA)
      What you don't understand is the wind and rain can kill billions even all the way u over in America.
      U die slowly the farther away you are.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      Hello ❤❤

    • @stuartallcock3516
      @stuartallcock3516 Год назад +7

      Doesn't matter if Nato don't use nukes, Russia will on the eu really quickly I might add if Nato attack any Russian military equipment.

  • @pressokali8021
    @pressokali8021 Год назад +3

    The guy said there’s no way they could stop those hypersonic rockets what does that even mean so you telling us nato air defence system can’t intercept them fam what’s happening here

  • @billstewartxxx
    @billstewartxxx Год назад +2

    that was useful... Thanks Major!

  • @andrewpanama5133
    @andrewpanama5133 Год назад +66

    everyone is arming up on nukes this will not end good

    • @MrOner07
      @MrOner07 Год назад

      let the nuclear war happen already.... as long as NATO expands

    • @guynorth3277
      @guynorth3277 Год назад +2

      Actually, they may have moved the readiness up a notch, but they are always ready.

    • @thilomanten8701
      @thilomanten8701 Год назад +3

      Thx to the fact that we have a country (Ukraine) that gave up its nuke arsenal in exchange for territoria integrity - Budapest Memorandum. As we see nukes are sth; whereas paper is nothing but "toilet paper"!

    • @Zindo.Majesty.HisMajesty
      @Zindo.Majesty.HisMajesty Год назад +3

      Now is the time to prepare for the worse but hope for the best. Shelter, food, water and Communications.

    • @nunuofficial5146
      @nunuofficial5146 Год назад

      Here is the full clip you all wanted:
      ruclips.net/video/mFnlLsX7eiw/видео.html

  • @DaveWhiteInYoFace
    @DaveWhiteInYoFace Год назад +1

    Hey! Anybody remember that show “Reliable Sources”? Yeah, me neither. 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • @tyguy6296
    @tyguy6296 Год назад +3

    this really could happen now, huh...
    30 years of not really worrying about it and it all falls apart in a couple months...

  • @TRE45ON.is.Bat5hit.Crazy.U.S.G
    @TRE45ON.is.Bat5hit.Crazy.U.S.G Год назад +81

    The sad irony is that no one threatened Russia. This is a disaster of its own making!

    • @sigmaputin6888
      @sigmaputin6888 Год назад

      What would American do if China placed missiles in Canada,Mexico or Cuba 🤔

    • @meliteletemp9137
      @meliteletemp9137 Год назад

      You need to study history
      ruclips.net/video/4E-EoOkLF_g/видео.html

    • @jasonhowland2903
      @jasonhowland2903 Год назад

      NATO is threatening Russia. Of course Russia shouldn’t attract the borderland but it’s not completely unprovoked

    • @zainzoala1083
      @zainzoala1083 Год назад +10

      🤣🤣🤣 Are you sure, you sound to be watching and repeating ' Nato News.

    • @vman9591
      @vman9591 Год назад +3

      100%

  • @Steve-om2rs
    @Steve-om2rs Год назад +37

    Earth is such a beautiful place, and to think one crazy old man could destroy it all.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +3

      It won’t end well for him

    • @vervetech9395
      @vervetech9395 Год назад +2

      @@perrywhite3955 He isn't scared for his life at his age. All this escalation and warmongering just to prove a point regardless of human lives. There's no way escalation from both the collective west and Russia would end well for human existence. The fallout of nukes affects people all over the globe for centuries. Chernobyl incident with the least radioactivity compared actual strategic nukes should be a reminder that the only way to peace is negotiations.

    • @seebanff7865
      @seebanff7865 Год назад

      Dear People's Republic of China:
      Out of courtesy and decency, let us inform you that...
      NATO members including USA, UK, and France are on high alert and currently watching or spying for any Russia nuclear system movements. Not because we are fearful, but to be alert and know when or if we pull the nuclear triggers as a response.
      We wouldn't want to mistakenly make Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland, accidentally.
      That only happens if we need to, intentionally.
      So it is entirely on weak and pathetic Putin if he chooses the path of nuclear destruction and makes Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland as his legacy, if that is what he wishes for.
      Don't worry. Although downwind from a Russia nuclear wasteland, I'm sure People's Republic of China will do just fine.
      Sincerely and Respectfully,
      NATO. All for one and one for all.
      PS. We still don't care about Russia Mir referendums and Russia claims of annexation in Ukraine, or anywhere actually.
      BTW. We almost forgot....
      Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
      Putin Huilo 😂
      Russia Mir gavno 💩

    • @artv.9989
      @artv.9989 Год назад

      I mean, have you seen our history? lol this was always inevitable

    • @ab-bc2gr
      @ab-bc2gr Год назад

      Humans are the worst species to inhabit the planet earth.
      Always greedy, never happy. Destroyers of everything pure and great.
      The sooner they are all gone, the better off earth will be.
      Hopefully all the Dump supporters will be on Mars with Musk and Bezos by then too.

  • @whtplstc
    @whtplstc Год назад +1

    The "no capability to shoot down hypersonic missiles" comment aged well…

    • @magiccheeseball
      @magiccheeseball 11 месяцев назад

      It's CNN whar do u expect bunch of jokers and fake news

  • @redginaldsanders6122
    @redginaldsanders6122 Год назад +7

    Knowing the phenomenal power, destruction, & residual effects that Thermo-nuclear weapons are capable of, please believe me when I say this next statement: Never ever NEVER grow complacent when ANYONE is talking about the potential use of those weapons. Never!

    • @mikeengler2645
      @mikeengler2645 Год назад

      Putin will fight till the end to the last soldier it's plain as day... everyday he breathes the world is in danger

  • @obamanyoutubetookmychannel3560
    @obamanyoutubetookmychannel3560 Год назад +451

    Condolences to all the families who lost their loved ones in Ukraine

    • @sigmaputin6888
      @sigmaputin6888 Год назад +29

      Does that include the civilians of Donbas

    • @captainmcawesome7908
      @captainmcawesome7908 Год назад +46

      @@sigmaputin6888 Yes that includes the civilians of Donbas which had to suffer under russian terrorism for almost a decade now.

    • @khanh604
      @khanh604 Год назад

      @@captainmcawesome7908 base on msm lol. You gonna have way more condolences when nuke start to fly. Have fun on social media lol.

    • @sigmaputin6888
      @sigmaputin6888 Год назад +36

      @@captainmcawesome7908 It was Ukraine who were shelling them

    • @captainmcawesome7908
      @captainmcawesome7908 Год назад +1

      ​@@sigmaputin6888 That is news to me. Are you in russia aware, that Putin is a pedophile who sexually abused both his daughters when they were children? Or are they keeping this information from you?

  • @5Dworld
    @5Dworld Год назад +20

    How crazy the world has become in such a short time. Now we are seriously talking about nuclear war. If you had done that one year ago, everybody would have laughed.
    No one is laughing now

    • @Mytzoshka18
      @Mytzoshka18 Год назад

      What the fuk do u expect, when we have a dement on the loose, threatening every day with nukes?

    • @johnsch1988
      @johnsch1988 Год назад

      Let's go Brandon !

    • @strongheadgame9490
      @strongheadgame9490 Год назад

      Your head game really grip tho 💪

    • @bykaygepeto4920
      @bykaygepeto4920 Год назад

      Not the world, Putin. The world is reacting

    • @Mytzoshka18
      @Mytzoshka18 Год назад

      @@bykaygepeto4920 Exactly, but putinism has brainwashed a lot of tards, making them think the world is nuts and putin is right lmao.

  • @chrismedley7422
    @chrismedley7422 Год назад +2

    If Russia uses nukes, then NATO has an obligation to remove them from Ukraine via any means necessary short of using our own.

    • @godwinmartin4084
      @godwinmartin4084 Год назад

      Then it will be NATO Vs Russia the NATO will be nucked

  • @dailylaughdose7030
    @dailylaughdose7030 Год назад +1

    I don't know what type of drugs this gentleman took but anyone knows if US even sent long range missile will cease

  • @martinralphwaiwai8018
    @martinralphwaiwai8018 Год назад +12

    The first realistic report I’ve seen from cnn for years

  • @chazm.5909
    @chazm.5909 Год назад +78

    a nuke is a nuke. tactical or strategic does not matter. what matters is the innocent lives potentially lost due to these devices.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +2

      That’s the basic true

    • @golantrevize1245
      @golantrevize1245 Год назад +12

      Yes does matters. A 60 Megaton nuke over a capital city is quite different than a nuclear artillery shell of 5 kiloton over enemy forces.

    • @Le_Dislike_Button
      @Le_Dislike_Button Год назад

      Defending OUR Democracy in The Ukraine is worth the price, even if that price is all life on earth.
      Any win for Putin is worse than #NuclearHolocaustForUkraine.
      everyone except for genocidal Trump MAGA cultists understand this.

    • @caesarsalad1170
      @caesarsalad1170 Год назад +4

      10kt nuke vs 10mt, quite a big difference.

    • @Smithsj82
      @Smithsj82 Год назад

      Tactical Nuke is a small nuke. You are right. It is still a nuke.

  • @john-kl3ux
    @john-kl3ux Год назад +224

    I've don't think he explained how Nato would respond or did I miss something!?

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      Hello

    • @chirpywiggins5796
      @chirpywiggins5796 Год назад +11

      Our leaders don't want it to de escalate.

    • @moosesnWoop
      @moosesnWoop Год назад

      @@chirpywiggins5796 lmfao they literally running the nuclear discourse and fearmongering. Biden literally said yesteraday they won't stop..

    • @shaolinrose7294
      @shaolinrose7294 Год назад +35

      Click bait mate.. The second NATO starts jumping unnecessarily once Putin nukes the clown… be ready to find shelter if you are in Paris berlin Warsaw Milan Brussels … they will be levelled and sent back to 100 BC 😂 for sticking their finger in unnecessary and uncalled places

    • @spacegerrit9499
      @spacegerrit9499 Год назад +1

      @@shaolinrose7294 100BC? That means the roman republic of Flaccus returns while non existant Russia is a stinking swamp?
      Europe: Empire
      Russia: Doesn't exist
      You were so damn edgy and then you screwed up in the end. You could've gone for "Stone Age" but you went for 100BC.
      Not even 100.000.000 BC or something? Dafuq is wrong with you, boy? 100BC is not that long ago for Europe.
      Vatnikscore: 2/10

  • @valeriewalker5831
    @valeriewalker5831 11 месяцев назад +1

    Looking at the map of my country and seeing this is just …. Devastating . What the hell is going on with these old men in power?!?

  • @dadangova6203
    @dadangova6203 Год назад +26

    Sick minds...even discussing it makes me sick

    • @seebanff7865
      @seebanff7865 Год назад

      Dear People's Republic of China:
      Out of courtesy and decency, let us inform you that...
      NATO members including USA, UK, and France are on high alert and currently watching or spying for any Russia nuclear system movements. Not because we are fearful, but to be alert and know when or if we pull the nuclear triggers as a response.
      We wouldn't want to mistakenly make Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland, accidentally.
      That only happens if we need to, intentionally.
      So it is entirely on weak and pathetic Putin if he chooses the path of nuclear destruction and makes Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland as his legacy, if that is what he wishes for.
      Don't worry. Although downwind from a Russia nuclear wasteland, I'm sure People's Republic of China will do just fine.
      Sincerely and Respectfully,
      NATO. All for one and one for all.
      PS. We still don't care about Russia Mir referendums and Russia claims of annexation in Ukraine, or anywhere actually.
      BTW. We almost forgot....
      Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
      Putin Huilo 😂
      Russia Mir gavno 💩

  • @seamusmc6272
    @seamusmc6272 Год назад +42

    There is no suc thing as a tactical nuke ALL nukes leave fallout and fallout does not necessarily stay i one place ...the wind takes it where it wants ANY use of nukes is STUPID

    • @sarahbrown5073
      @sarahbrown5073 Год назад +1

      Well...this administration really likes them, so buckle up.

    • @LOLatThefail
      @LOLatThefail Год назад

      There is a huge difference between all out nuclear war (Strategic nukes) and small scale tactical nuke.
      You’re comparing the fallout of an area less than 5km to a strategic one that can poison a whole continent.

    • @Eric-og7ol
      @Eric-og7ol Год назад

      Please inform the Pentagon that there is "no suc thing as a tactical nuke" in anyone's inventory. I would be interested in what they say.

    • @rjlacroix3334
      @rjlacroix3334 Год назад

      There is in fact a difference . Tactical being , that a 20 sq mile area is destroyed and rendered inhabitable after an attack , as opposed to an entire Continent being vaporized .

    • @seamusmc6272
      @seamusmc6272 Год назад

      @@rjlacroix3334 and what happens after one Tactical nuke is fired?

  • @adissabovic
    @adissabovic Год назад

    A "physical response"?! What's that, scratching balls?

  • @doublevision84
    @doublevision84 Год назад +1

    The dumbest part about America is we broadcast everything, locations and plans for military strategies

  • @sbeast64
    @sbeast64 Год назад +75

    Praying for peace. Really hoping things deescalate!

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      Hello

    • @stuartallcock3516
      @stuartallcock3516 Год назад +7

      Unfortunately this is going to get worse... For everyone.

    • @gooldii1
      @gooldii1 Год назад

      If somebody Bazztard is throwing Hundrets of Stones from the Neighbour Ground, you should not invest Milions, to fight again the Stones, you go to that Bully, and hit him in his ugly Face! Or throw Stones back!1 ATACMS would be better, than 1000 AA Rockets! hit the RuSSian Bazztardz!

    • @seebanff7865
      @seebanff7865 Год назад

      Dear People's Republic of China:
      Out of courtesy and decency, let us inform you that...
      NATO members including USA, UK, and France are on high alert and currently watching or spying for any Russia nuclear system movements. Not because we are fearful, but to be alert and know when or if we pull the nuclear triggers as a response.
      We wouldn't want to mistakenly make Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland, accidentally.
      That only happens if we need to, intentionally.
      So it is entirely on weak and pathetic Putin if he chooses the path of nuclear destruction and makes Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland as his legacy, if that is what he wishes for.
      Don't worry. Although downwind from a Russia nuclear wasteland, I'm sure People's Republic of China will do just fine.
      Sincerely and Respectfully,
      NATO. All for one and one for all.
      PS. We still don't care about Russia Mir referendums and Russia claims of annexation in Ukraine, or anywhere actually.
      BTW. We almost forgot....
      Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
      Putin Huilo 😂
      Russia Mir gavno 💩

    • @TRUMP-2024-MAGA
      @TRUMP-2024-MAGA Год назад +7

      Trump will save the day

  • @bloggerfromthefuture
    @bloggerfromthefuture Год назад +6

    So where does this video actually explain how NATO would respond? I don't see it.

  • @johnschuster1770
    @johnschuster1770 Год назад

    Tactical nukes will NOT make a wasteland out of Western Ukraine, that's why they're called tactical nukes and not strategic nukes. They are target-focused, not area-focused.

  • @Shawn-od6yw
    @Shawn-od6yw Год назад +1

    Nato has no business getting involved directly
    That will start the end of the world

  • @marianop.7220
    @marianop.7220 Год назад +10

    This is like when they said Russia would not invade...

    • @meliteletemp9137
      @meliteletemp9137 Год назад

      They count on this that Russia invade, because US antagonize Russia from years
      ruclips.net/video/4E-EoOkLF_g/видео.html
      And send weapons to Ukraine from 2015, against Russia.

  • @justice3125
    @justice3125 Год назад +37

    If any Ukrainian people reading this, may you and your family stay safe from this catastrophic period. Stay strong Ukraine🇺🇦🇺🇦

    • @padre_paulas
      @padre_paulas Год назад +1

      Thank you, we appreciate your support!

    • @nunuofficial5146
      @nunuofficial5146 Год назад

      Here is the full recommended clip that explain that :
      ruclips.net/video/mFnlLsX7eiw/видео.html

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      Amen❤

  • @joe-hl9rl
    @joe-hl9rl Год назад +1

    the fact that this is being talked about like it's a fucking weather forecast is telling of the state of global affairs.

  • @HYP3RC0L0R
    @HYP3RC0L0R Год назад +1

    Clickbait, actually says nothing about how NATO would respond now, only in the 80’s scenario.

  • @Ganiscol
    @Ganiscol Год назад +133

    It has to have a "physical" response or it would not only set a precedent for others but also encourage putin to continue - because Ukraine wouldnt back down. And they shouldnt.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +1

      True talk

    • @chirpywiggins5796
      @chirpywiggins5796 Год назад

      Ukraine will need ton sit down with Russia otherwise they'll lose everything and so will Europe in a nuclear conflict, oh and the US and Russia.

    • @seebanff7865
      @seebanff7865 Год назад

      Dear People's Republic of China:
      Out of courtesy and decency, let us inform you that...
      NATO members including USA, UK, and France are on high alert and currently watching or spying for any Russia nuclear system movements. Not because we are fearful, but to be alert and know when or if we pull the nuclear triggers as a response.
      We wouldn't want to mistakenly make Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland, accidentally.
      That only happens if we need to, intentionally.
      So it is entirely on weak and pathetic Putin if he chooses the path of nuclear destruction and makes Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland as his legacy, if that is what he wishes for.
      Don't worry. Although downwind from a Russia nuclear wasteland, I'm sure People's Republic of China will do just fine.
      Sincerely and Respectfully,
      NATO. All for one and one for all.
      PS. We still don't care about Russia Mir referendums and Russia claims of annexation in Ukraine, or anywhere actually.
      BTW. We almost forgot....
      Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
      Putin Huilo 😂
      Russia Mir gavno 💩

    • @afcgeo882
      @afcgeo882 Год назад +5

      What wasn’t mentioned was what that physical response might be - because no one knows as any physical response would guarantee a strategic nuclear war.

    • @rikmichaels9233
      @rikmichaels9233 Год назад

      This needs to stop or all of humanity is doomed! That’s where this leads!! They want us in WW3!!! Look into the Cuban missile crisis!

  • @beckettman42
    @beckettman42 Год назад +12

    The board is set, the pieces are moving. We come to it at last, the great battle of our time.

  • @DarkstarDarth
    @DarkstarDarth Год назад +4

    The Russian mayor of Kherson has ordered its citizens to leave Kherson as Ukrainian troops advance, that could be the tactic to really worry about considering it will clear the area for a possible WMD.

  • @thomasflaye1741
    @thomasflaye1741 Год назад +4

    If a nuclear weapon is used i think even non nato members need to give a physical response. Some countries are only 1 nuke away from ending their journey and into history books.

  • @madness198648
    @madness198648 Год назад +17

    Did he really say that tactical nukes only have a range of 20 miles? Hahahah

    • @Ara_Arasaka
      @Ara_Arasaka Год назад

      “Only”
      Like we are just fodder…

    • @cjohnson3836
      @cjohnson3836 Год назад +5

      No, he said artillery delivered tactical nukes have a range of ~20miles. He specifically mentioned sub/air launched cruise missiles are a completely different matter. Learn to pay attention.

    • @TheSaintBigFoot
      @TheSaintBigFoot Год назад +2

      I'm pretty sure he said the radius, like the blast and fallout portion. Even big nukes are limited in their blast radius

    • @paulbentley2709
      @paulbentley2709 Год назад

      Obviously he means primary kill radius ...which is terrible enough.

    • @cjohnson3836
      @cjohnson3836 Год назад +1

      @@TheSaintBigFoot Tactical nukes do not have blast radii anywhere close to 20 miles. A 2MT (2000kT) strategic nuclear ICBM only has a blast radius of around 5 miles, and a thermal lethality range of 9-10miles.

  • @MrJLCharbonneau
    @MrJLCharbonneau Год назад +53

    Even if they were used in retreat, there’s no guarantee where that ash cloud would fall. It’s not like salting the earth out of spite. The radiation would poison Russian territory as well.

    • @stardude2006
      @stardude2006 Год назад +10

      You are correct, The prevailing winds move west to EAST The fallout will land upon ruzzian soil.

    • @Areaninetyone
      @Areaninetyone Год назад

      Look at Chernobyl Russia doesn't seem to care much about poisoning themselves.

    • @bustercheeks4116
      @bustercheeks4116 Год назад +2

      @@stardude2006 we have had a ton of eastern winds in USA lately.
      Maybe I'm just in an Appalachian mountain valley and catch swirls.
      Normally west to east but it can change on a dime

    • @stardude2006
      @stardude2006 Год назад +1

      @@bustercheeks4116 No.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +2

      Definitely

  • @gunaybagatur3555
    @gunaybagatur3555 Год назад +1

    USE IT , CLEAR ALL THE RUBBISH AROUND

  • @nipunchandrawansa9014
    @nipunchandrawansa9014 Год назад +2

    Play the full Roger waters interview.

  • @clydecessna737
    @clydecessna737 Год назад +82

    I spoke to a West German general who had extensively de-briefed his East German counterparts. The East German generals said that ALL the scenarios and ALL the exercises they participated in assumed nearly 200 tactical nuclear weapons would be used against NATO forces on the first day of WW3.

    • @marioluigi9599
      @marioluigi9599 Год назад +3

      Lol!

    • @beanseason6515
      @beanseason6515 Год назад +16

      "Trust me bro. It's Clyde bro. I know generals"

    • @asiaticoasis
      @asiaticoasis Год назад +7

      This means earthquakes everywhere on top of nuclear fall out

    • @meliteletemp9137
      @meliteletemp9137 Год назад

      NATO next week will make nuclear weapons exercises in Poland. Guess what can happened if one plane will "accidently" fly near border of Russia or Belarus

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      Hello

  • @thingsreviewed7932
    @thingsreviewed7932 Год назад +9

    As children we are taught not to take things that don't belong to us... just so we can grow up into a world where adults takes things that don't belong to them!

    • @beanseason6515
      @beanseason6515 Год назад +2

      I wasn't taught that. I was taught this world is every man for himself, so I guess I'm a lot more prepared than you were.

    • @thingsreviewed7932
      @thingsreviewed7932 Год назад

      @@beanseason6515 The sad reality is, YES, you probably were more prepared than many others besides just me.

    • @caesarsalad1170
      @caesarsalad1170 Год назад

      @@beanseason6515 If this world was "every man for himself" We wouldn't be living in this current society. Do you think you're prepared for a nuclear war?

    • @hennry7290
      @hennry7290 Год назад

      @@thingsreviewed7932 where are you from?

    • @calebuic4310
      @calebuic4310 Год назад

      @@beanseason6515 you weren’t taught not to take things from others?

  • @stdesy
    @stdesy Год назад

    “Escalate to deescalate” is probably the dumbest idea possible

  • @cablaze1
    @cablaze1 Год назад +1

    I did not hear the answer to the title..... "Official explains how NATO would respond to possible Russian nuclear strike".
    DISLIKE

  • @AmazingJohnny
    @AmazingJohnny Год назад +15

    God may protect Ukraine and Ukrainians 💙💛🙏 !

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott Год назад +85

    This provides a frightening, yet realistic scenario for how a tactical nuke could be used and why Putin might consider them a viable 'tool'.
    What's missing here (and understandably so) is speculation about how NATO would respond. I did not hear this mentioned. Therefore, the title should not have mentioned NATO's response.
    It seems to me that if the nuke is used to create a barrier between Ukrainian and Russian forces, placed just west of Russia's annexed territories, the response would have to be to use air power and advanced weapons to 'jump' that barrier and destroy Russian personnel and assets supposedly protected by the nuclear barrier

    • @billparsonson7259
      @billparsonson7259 Год назад

      He isnt using any nukes, ignore this fear mongering bullshit. If he used ONE his country would be fucking obliterated in the blink of an eye. His government wouldn't allow him to make such a stupid decision.

    • @donaldmackerer9032
      @donaldmackerer9032 Год назад +10

      And that's where things could begin to start getting out of hand. Another point is, if Russia did happen to win this war, and annexed Ukraine, that land and maybe other surrounding areas due to fall out would be totally useless to them. So what do they really have to gain in the long run other than saving pootler's Pride? However there's no telling what madvlad might do.

    • @rjlacroix3334
      @rjlacroix3334 Год назад

      NATO will use all combined conventional means to destroy all Russian assets in Ukraine within 72 hours .

    • @FirstNameLastName-wt5to
      @FirstNameLastName-wt5to Год назад

      The point of the title is to scare you so you support the coming war which Biden has to deliver to his owners.

    • @him.splendid
      @him.splendid Год назад +3

      в таком случае ракеты прилетят быстро на большие города США?

  • @kenthepen247gmail
    @kenthepen247gmail Год назад +5

    At the end of his dissertation the military officer admits we have nothing to stop the hypersonic missile delivery system

    • @genericscout5408
      @genericscout5408 Год назад

      Yep that is true, but normally the hypersonics don't mount heavy ordinance.

    • @moralexbme
      @moralexbme Год назад

      he didn't say that, what he said is that Ukrainians don't have the means to stop them.

  • @stephen6866
    @stephen6866 Год назад +1

    As long as they drop one out in country side and it doesn't kill anyone?

  • @mrtruth1351
    @mrtruth1351 Год назад +8

    Anybody remember how many times CNN said in the past month how Ukraine is winning am I the only one that notices the red just gets bigger and bigger every time they show this map

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      It’s just their thing ….. making Putin look stupid before his people and Putin isn’t backing out anything soon

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      @S D yeah

    • @antiquegeek
      @antiquegeek Год назад +1

      What map are you seeing because that aint the right map. Are you trolling or just delusional.

    • @bentels5340
      @bentels5340 Год назад +2

      Do you have a history of bad memory or color dyslexia?

    • @francisdec1615
      @francisdec1615 Год назад +1

      Ukraine is retaking territory the whole time. But it's not over until Russia is out of Ukraine and so military weakened that it can't try again.

  • @nickeh8083
    @nickeh8083 Год назад +2

    Helmets on in New York.🚀

  • @szpoti
    @szpoti Год назад +4

    I am not sure how the title represents the content.

  • @bennie_pie
    @bennie_pie Год назад +3

    I think that nuking the Kherson area as suggested would also have the effect of contaminating Crimea's water supply, not a wise move for Russia. Then again, the last few months have shown that wise moves are not their strong point.

    • @robertneighbors4091
      @robertneighbors4091 Год назад

      and not to mention the entire black sea - - which a lot of Russia enjoys, I have been to the beaches of Sochi, only distasteful thing was learning all the sewage pipes from the hotels run 1/2 mile or less out into the sea, and a less than fully saline sea at that.

    • @tomarsandbeyond
      @tomarsandbeyond Год назад

      @@robertneighbors4091 not necessarily. The entire region doesn't magically get contaminated. It would depend on winds and height of the explosion. If set off high enough, little fallout. The two bombs on Japan did not make all of Japan uninhabitable. These nukes are similar in yield to those.

    • @robertneighbors3520
      @robertneighbors3520 Год назад

      @@tomarsandbeyond US and NATO shoulda sent hitmen over and take out Putin early on, lot's of lives woulda been saved on both sides.

    • @tomarsandbeyond
      @tomarsandbeyond Год назад

      @@robertneighbors3520 assassination can't replace foreign policy. Russia would consider it an act of war and he would be a martyr.

  • @littlecaesars1821
    @littlecaesars1821 Год назад +2

    can we stop pushing nuclear war and actually do peace treaties? like there’s so many ideas to stop russia yet they’re still pusing nuclear war

  • @UNBIASEDGLOBALNEWS
    @UNBIASEDGLOBALNEWS Год назад +19

    How about these leaders and the wealthy politicians take themselves and their entire family to the front lines and show us their "bravery"? Most of us are sick of their antics... we want them to show how they truly feel about each other.... then we can pick our sides.... well... I think most of us would just let them kill each other for theater and future movies.

  • @armadildo6468
    @armadildo6468 Год назад +8

    War. War never changes.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      In Tupac’s voice ‘ Something will never changed ‘

    • @bluesteel5841
      @bluesteel5841 Год назад

      Always started by governments.. civilians just want to live there life as is..

    • @EbonySaints
      @EbonySaints Год назад

      Don't know if I should post, "War has changed." to ruin everything or just roll with the Fallout (New Vegas obviously, since no one's apparently old enough to get the OG games anymore and nobody with any taste likes the East Coast games.) quotes. Gonna go get a skintight sneaking suit and some 50's football pads and helmets to cover for both.

    • @armadildo6468
      @armadildo6468 Год назад +1

      @@EbonySaints lol i just beat FO1 and starting 2 now. New vegas is the bestt of the modern series

    • @armadildo6468
      @armadildo6468 Год назад +1

      @@EbonySaints fallout 3 is good. 4 is eh and 76 was shit. I dont know how it is since i paid for the pre-order and then left if after 2 days of play.

  • @h.p.324
    @h.p.324 Год назад +1

    =_= that’s why we need to stop supporting Ukraine and try to talk with both presidents for peace

  • @MattyJ55046
    @MattyJ55046 Год назад +4

    I didn’t think tactical nukes radiation lasted more than a few years at most.

    • @tomarsandbeyond
      @tomarsandbeyond Год назад

      It would be similar to Hiroshima and people live there now. These bombs are about that yield. An area would probably have to be vacated for years.

  • @peterdavila3045
    @peterdavila3045 Год назад +3

    Let's give Ukraine some nukes without telling Putin. Then, once the weapons are in Ukraine, have Zelensky call the Russian military and let them know what would happen to Moscow if Russia uses nukes in Ukraine. Simple. Deterrence must be based on strength. You have got to stand up to bullies!

  • @rk3726
    @rk3726 Год назад

    It's the nato and US who have been talking nukes all the time, not Russia if anybody noticed that closely !!!!

  • @nelsonreyes5418
    @nelsonreyes5418 Год назад

    So it's a semi-nuke not an actual NUKE BOMB ? 🤔

  • @sinistan1002
    @sinistan1002 Год назад +19

    nato would respond conventionally which means targeting russian weapons and troops which could then likely cause pootin to launch icbms at some point then everyone launches and thats the end 😄

    • @Mr.Not_Sure
      @Mr.Not_Sure Год назад

      Wrong smile

    • @beatallgames214
      @beatallgames214 Год назад

      They won’t

    • @beatallgames214
      @beatallgames214 Год назад

      Trust me even if they use tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine ! They will not attract Russia’s forces bcz Ukraine is not in nato ! If they do they understand that Russia’s existence would be at risk hence lunching tsar bomba in Europe ! They would be nato provoking and attacking Russia not vise versa! Bcz not country in nato Putin attacked

    • @VioIetShift
      @VioIetShift Год назад

      Why would they? The escalation spiral is only in play if NATO used its own nuclear weapons. Russia isn't going to end the world because they lose a turf war.

  • @howardbaxter2514
    @howardbaxter2514 Год назад +1

    Here’s a crazy idea. How about we try to sue for peace. You know, try everything in our power to get Russia and Ukraine to the table to discuss a peaceful resolution, cause right now, we are backing a President into a corner where he is strongly considering the NUCLEAR option. That’s terrifying.

  • @uncletom886
    @uncletom886 Год назад

    Feels like they doing a run down of a up and coming boxing fight lol

  • @stephenroldan5107
    @stephenroldan5107 Год назад +3

    Wind doesn't exist in ruzzia?

  • @timw4369
    @timw4369 Год назад +3

    Flatten red square.

    • @bentels5340
      @bentels5340 Год назад +1

      You know it already *is* flat, right?

  • @dustyroads5721
    @dustyroads5721 Год назад

    I prefer $1 gas and mean tweets to Armageddon!

  • @lisamendelowitz3377
    @lisamendelowitz3377 Год назад

    We cannot stop them. We cannot beat them. Thats what they are NOT telling you. They are aware.

  • @trainmaster0217
    @trainmaster0217 Год назад +13

    Did I miss where he explained what NATO would do to a Russian nuke strike?

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +1

      😂😂

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +2

      You didn’t

    • @codymix3490
      @codymix3490 Год назад

      No..they won't do shit except make news clips and have un meetings with all sorts of cool people

    • @WilsonSilvaPT23
      @WilsonSilvaPT23 Год назад

      They will bomb the shit out of Moscow

  • @YouD0ntSay
    @YouD0ntSay Год назад +5

    I missed the bit where he explains how Nato would respond.

  • @noneatthistime
    @noneatthistime Год назад

    Who the F is Mike Lyons LOL and when did Putin actually say "Tactical Nuke"

  • @rodcamp4472
    @rodcamp4472 Год назад

    You 'went there'. Nope, running through nuclear scenarios is a very BAD IDEA.

  • @patuxent78
    @patuxent78 Год назад +5

    I guess Mike Lyons is a decent person to talk to. I mean....he only served for a few years in the US Army, his only wartime experience was in Gulf War, over thirty years ago. He's been working in the corporate section for the past 20 plus years, not working for the DoD at any point. But yea...sure....he's an expert. But because he has opinions on Twitter and he writes editorials on his opinions must make him an expert on what we might do, considering how he's not in the Pentagon to know that answer. He's not even on the same field as we are and haven't been for a very long time.

    • @davidbrett8701
      @davidbrett8701 Год назад

      Yeah...sure.. you're an expert

    • @patuxent78
      @patuxent78 Год назад +3

      @@davidbrett8701 , considering I’m an officer in the US Army with over twenty years of experience and actually working in the Pentagon. Uhm….yea I’m more of an expert than the guy who left the Army nearly thirty years ago with only 7 years of experience.
      Plus, I know him. I’ve read his stuff, and lord knows he writes a lot. However, much of it is WAY off base and not with the current line of thinking or current operations. He’s out of touch because he hasn’t served for THIRTY YEARS and only has 7 years of service.

    • @davidbrett8701
      @davidbrett8701 Год назад

      @@patuxent78 well since we've been graced with your expert presence in the RUclips comment section. What's your answer?

    • @patuxent78
      @patuxent78 Год назад +1

      @@davidbrett8701 so you just go around trolling people everyday on social media? Pathetic existence.

  • @jonathanmiller291
    @jonathanmiller291 Год назад +16

    I love how they say if Russia uses a nuke on ukraine nato will respond but after that response, Russia will respond to... will they respond by hitting ukraine again or us? And when did we decide we all wanted to die for ukraine

    • @valinorean4816
      @valinorean4816 Год назад

      > And when did we decide we all wanted to die for ukraine - when it became clear that either we allow Putin do do everything he wants (and e.g. Alaska is Russian, according to his ideology) or we don't

    • @lorgaraurelian8301
      @lorgaraurelian8301 Год назад +2

      This is not about Ukraine, its about world order.

    • @hennry7290
      @hennry7290 Год назад +2

      @@lorgaraurelian8301 which world you talking about?

    • @mistressofthewoods5333
      @mistressofthewoods5333 Год назад +2

      @@lorgaraurelian8301 "Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee..."

    • @nirajshrestha5621
      @nirajshrestha5621 Год назад

      usa making eu clown, using eu, usa has nothing to lose and eu have a lot to lose if that happens, so better stop listening to warmongers usa thriving by exploiting others.

  • @grundy333
    @grundy333 Год назад

    This is some crazy shit. He talks about it like it’s going to happen and what is scary is the scenario seems plausible several days later now…

  • @chrisf4268
    @chrisf4268 Год назад

    He didn't explain anything about what would be the response if Russia used nukes.

  • @josephsalvi4008
    @josephsalvi4008 Год назад +3

    I have been surprised how wrong these generals have been since the beginning of this war.

    • @siggifreud812
      @siggifreud812 Год назад

      this guy only made Major. it shows....

  • @Giselle-gx3iz
    @Giselle-gx3iz Год назад +16

    Are we really doing this?!?! Over pushing for negotiations? Wow.

    • @Eastsidet03
      @Eastsidet03 Год назад +3

      Yea the world is doomed

    • @MrOner07
      @MrOner07 Год назад

      NATO wanted war with Russia from the beginning.... thats why it was expanding towards their border... negotiation was never an option

    • @sqb2316
      @sqb2316 Год назад +5

      Exactly. Neither side is backing down. Russia is in the wrong, but I guess people would rather see a global economic crisis and a possible nuclear war than go to the negotiation table with Russia.

    • @handsomestik
      @handsomestik Год назад

      Oh yeah , they never meant too

    • @handsomestik
      @handsomestik Год назад +3

      @@sqb2316 yup, this is ridiculous

  • @Mr80jb
    @Mr80jb Год назад

    Respond? Prevent it in the first place you fools.

  • @Shankster354
    @Shankster354 Год назад

    That would be so dum I hope this never happens

  • @midnyte6195
    @midnyte6195 Год назад +9

    Russia basically sealed it's fate either way

  • @PantheonContent
    @PantheonContent Год назад +3

    Another day, another historical event unfolding. Man, kids these days got it rough.

  • @Taco1011
    @Taco1011 Год назад +11

    One terrifying possibility to consider is the risk of a rogue officer somewhere along the chain of command launching a tactical weapon if they feel their position is about to be over run by a Ukrainian advance. This, however, is unlikely for the reason of Russian Command not wanting panicked officers launching nuclear weapons. And it's not even clear that there are weapons in forward positions. In fact, the intelligence says that there has been no movement from known nuclear weapons storage sites.

    • @markfish1113
      @markfish1113 Год назад

      Russian generals have very little power, they fight as field commander hence so many get killed. Launching nukes require Putin himself to authorise.

    • @davewalters6348
      @davewalters6348 Год назад

      A Ukrainian advance ? Good gawd man. There will be no such thing anymore. The only thing Russia has said is they will not use a 1st strike and will only respond if Western nations launch 1st. Maby get a better source of news ?

  • @DaminionC
    @DaminionC Год назад

    NATO: I miss the part where that’s my problem.

  • @Arcenia13
    @Arcenia13 Год назад +3

    Sad. Why? All due to land and status? Human life is much more worth than greed. Prayers for peace.

  • @etiennepoisson2480
    @etiennepoisson2480 Год назад +9

    How bold of them to put their tactics on youtube. US have balls of steel

    • @tanberetO
      @tanberetO Год назад +1

      This is just the news, not actual military doctrine. Lol.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад

      😂😂😂

    • @seebanff7865
      @seebanff7865 Год назад

      Dear People's Republic of China:
      Out of courtesy and decency, let us inform you that...
      NATO members including USA, UK, and France are on high alert and currently watching or spying for any Russia nuclear system movements. Not because we are fearful, but to be alert and know when or if we pull the nuclear triggers as a response.
      We wouldn't want to mistakenly make Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland, accidentally.
      That only happens if we need to, intentionally.
      So it is entirely on weak and pathetic Putin if he chooses the path of nuclear destruction and makes Russia Mir motherland a nuclear wasteland as his legacy, if that is what he wishes for.
      Don't worry. Although downwind from a Russia nuclear wasteland, I'm sure People's Republic of China will do just fine.
      Sincerely and Respectfully,
      NATO. All for one and one for all.
      PS. We still don't care about Russia Mir referendums and Russia claims of annexation in Ukraine, or anywhere actually.
      BTW. We almost forgot....
      Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
      Putin Huilo 😂
      Russia Mir gavno 💩

    • @etiennepoisson2480
      @etiennepoisson2480 Год назад

      @@tanberetO omg ok

    • @bluesteel5841
      @bluesteel5841 Год назад

      Cnn and fox are good for this...i hate both the networks..only watch 2 min of this..cnn and fox are state Media political networks..there full of openions and hate..said thing there like a cult with alot of followers. Why in America everyone is against the other..people need to not watch cnn and fox.. bring back old style news, reports no f n openions..

  • @levesquejean-francois3287
    @levesquejean-francois3287 Год назад

    Why max 480p?!?

  • @mohadelassi6079
    @mohadelassi6079 Год назад

    There is no unique way for response. It would be a suicidal one

  • @journeymansmitty8283
    @journeymansmitty8283 Год назад +6

    Vladdy boy ain't doing that that's just an idle threat he ain't crazy the whole world will come after him if he does anything like this🤔

    • @younglife6877
      @younglife6877 Год назад +1

      "vladdy boy" 😂😂🤦‍♂️ slow down keyboard warrior might break a nail 😂😂💀

    • @journeymansmitty8283
      @journeymansmitty8283 Год назад

      @@younglife6877 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

  • @jamo491
    @jamo491 Год назад +4

    Where's the whole nato response thing?

    • @karadan100
      @karadan100 Год назад

      Which NATO country has been attacked???? I'll wait for your answer.

    • @jamo491
      @jamo491 Год назад +4

      @@karadan100 check out the clips title , that's all I'm asking , but thanks for going off on a tangent.

    • @perrywhite3955
      @perrywhite3955 Год назад +1

      None

  • @mychangedsoul
    @mychangedsoul Год назад

    This is not about NATO response it’s about telling Putin how to use nuks. Lol

  • @sabprogroup8623
    @sabprogroup8623 Год назад +1

    that last part smh

  • @mabpixie
    @mabpixie Год назад +13

    I find it so odd that these experts are saying what may happen. Hello if they not thought of it yet you just gave them the idea. Why is this information not kept quiet to avoid that?

    • @antiquegeek
      @antiquegeek Год назад +5

      This is a case that they are discussing things both sides already know. No surprises here.

  • @notindoctrinated293
    @notindoctrinated293 Год назад +17

    Territories, which are under shelling and bombs of a native country where children and civilians are dying and suffering for years, could not remain under control and within the borders of the native country any more. If you analyze and take into account the situation in the ex-Yugoslavia regions, as well as many others all around the world , you’ll see that secession and/or split indeed, had occurred. Why would Ukraine be an exception ? Just because of the USA, UK, EU interests in it ?

    • @sistermaryfrances4480
      @sistermaryfrances4480 Год назад +2

      They are not a territory of Russia, it's in a whole complete another country just because they happen to be on the same continent doesn't mean Russia owns them you people make me sick

    • @valinorean4816
      @valinorean4816 Год назад

      Ukrainians never shelled civilians in Donbass, what are you smoking? Russian propaganda?

    • @UtilityCurve
      @UtilityCurve Год назад +1

      @@sistermaryfrances4480 I take it that if there are any regions of the Russian Federation proper that seek to separate from it, you will support them? Or is it that Russia is so benevolent, so beneficial that no ethnic minorities could ever want to leave (unless bribed to do so by the CIA/MI6/Mossad?).

    • @genericscout5408
      @genericscout5408 Год назад

      It's called oil. Ukraine can actually defend it's stake and sell resources to the west.

    • @Franky566
      @Franky566 Год назад

      @@sistermaryfrances4480
      you realize that ukraine has literal nazi batalions, right?
      seriously, im not even exagerating.