Justice Gorsuch, Carpenter, & the Fourth Amendment [POLICYbrief]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 дек 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @Sweetness-db7hx
    @Sweetness-db7hx 5 лет назад

    You cite the case as if it was released in 2017. The decision wasn’t released until 2018.

  • @roberttwomey2011
    @roberttwomey2011 5 лет назад +1

    Can someone explain the 5 th amendment? Is it not the same as just not answering a question??

    • @roberttwomey2011
      @roberttwomey2011 5 лет назад

      DLeCo thank you!

    • @roberttwomey2011
      @roberttwomey2011 5 лет назад

      Christopher Crepon but isn’t doing that not to incriminate yourself the same as not answering a question because your guilty?

    • @unfilthy
      @unfilthy 5 лет назад

      If you don't want to talk to a cop, don't invoke the 5th. Ask for a lawyer. If you don't do it right, you could get screwed on a technicality.

    • @TannerLuna1
      @TannerLuna1 5 лет назад

      You can only claim the 5th for a custodial interrogation. The 5th due process clause apples to the federal government while the 14th is the vehicle to the states.

    • @TimeLessEntityT0
      @TimeLessEntityT0 5 лет назад

      @@TannerLuna1 Incorrect. The state government must follow the United States Constitution. The 5th Amendment applies to both FBI and local police. States can give you extra rights but they cannot take away any rights that the United States Constitution guarantees.

  • @eugenealvarez4741
    @eugenealvarez4741 3 года назад

    Too lengthy just get to the case. You are confusing freshman students by going on and on. Get to the meat of the case, not the other reviewed cases. If needed, the review of cases can be explained on another video just mention the reviewed cases don't explain them.

    • @agnessantiago5680
      @agnessantiago5680 2 года назад +4

      In a case summary, you must cite precedent cases that paved the way behind the courts reasoning in their decisions. In briefs, it is important to include cases that share similar or almost identical facts which helps the readers understand how the judges came to a conclusion. This video explained the 119 page court opinion perfectly.

    • @rktsnail
      @rktsnail 8 месяцев назад

      If you actually want to get an A exam grade you would see they were beset creating a new rule here by moving away from the main controlling cases in this field and since this holding in carpenter was extremely narrow, when the number of days changes in the fact pattern, or the nature of the crime is more serious, the jones smith and miller reasoning will need to be manipulated again to produce a likely result, and that is what your professor will ask you to do on this extremely recent and important case that will no doubt be taken up again soon by the court. It’s the perfect ACJ exam question. Pay attention