How Could The Big Bang Arise From Nothing - The Universe is Nothingness
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 окт 2023
- Nothing existed at the outset. After then, the cosmos began to take shape some 13.7 billion years ago. How this came to be or if there was ever a time before time is still a mystery. Yet, physicists have pieced together an approximate timeline of significant events in the cosmos' existence using telescope data and models of particle physics. From its beginning to its inevitable demise, we examine key points in the evolution of our universe here.
#science #universe #space 
Наука
![Roddy Ricch - Survivors Remorse [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/J5IeFzr2GgE/mqdefault.jpg)
13.7 billion years old... yet we have Galaxies fully formed as perfect as the Milky Way, where there shouldn't even be stars. Seems like mankind, just can't wrap his heap around the thing being eternal. No end, no begining. It doesn't align with our view of how things work. Yet all the evidence, points toward it being the only true fact we do know.
put the pipe down. every word of your message is completely divorced from reality
I never believed the Big Bang ever since it was theorized lol
Like how could something come from nothing, theirs a lot more to it it’s something we can’t yet understand
It didn't "come from nothing" so there's your problem. Also, science doesn't give a damn whether you "believe" it or not.
it didnt come from nothing? lol what did it come from genius? and when you answer this, then tell me what did that come from? @@martin2289
Any view of the beginning of the universe is dependent upon an assumption of something coming from nothing.
@@martin2289 actually that human voodoo science doesn't give a damn about anything. Those clowns just want funding so they'll make up anything no matter how ridiculous to get it, and the superstitious public will automatically follow along.
@@martin2289the theory is literally that there was no space or time before the Big Bang, so yes…. It did come from nothing.
An endless loop of where did it come from
Did you not read the title?
I've always felt the big bang... is the end of a past universe. 1 singular last black hole.. unable to contain all the matter of 'said past universe' in a way went not unlike supernova. where a blackhole impodes on itself, everything contained within that. gets redistribute just as stars do..
if energy doesn't die / fade.... dark energy is that what gives gravity. the push force on matter. that creates our universe. without that I don't think anything would have been possible..
push from outside.. everything inside will find a 'way to survive'
The first nine minute production entertaining.. i'll join bookmark watch the rest another time in space too!
Time is an earthly factor. How then is the age of the universe and everything in it calculated using our own time structure.
You have said the 2nd dumbest thing I've heard today 🤪 What makes a person literally stand up before everyone and proclaim "I'm ignorant of science?" The thing is you could have checked before letting everyone know you know nothing. But you didnt. So time is a Earthly factor huh? Time doesnt work the same on the moon? On Saturn? The Sun? Then exactly how do we know it takes a photon 8 minutes to get from the Sun to Earth? Our universe is literally called Space/Time. 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 The Theory of Relativity explains in detail what you say isn't so. So who do we trust? You? Who has absolutely no scientific education yet comes on the internet attempting to pose as someone who is smart but was immediately betrayed by your lack of education? Or a man who is literally known as histories greatest scientist? Per Google - Albert Einstein theorized, quite accurately, that time and space are relative rather than absolute. Even though they are inextricably linked, space and time are perceived differently by sentient beings. That's because an object's movement and how it experiences time is relative to other things around it. 😖 Doh!!! This information is over 75 yrs old.
Many years ago, I saw a documentary about the big bang. The theory presented was, a "pocket" of gas was just floating around and thru some miracle, it bumped into another"pocket" , started a chain reaction, then.... bang.
The theory has evolved over time but it was never that.
Where did the other pocket come from? I'm with you...dont buy into the BB
@@pauly362 why did the astrophysics community settle on the Big Bang theory? Because the evidence for it is overwhelming. As more evidence has come to light, the details have changed. E.g. the dominant theory today is eternal Inflation.
But you are all aware of NONE of that. So your opinion is worth precisely nothing.
no pockets. Only quantum-level fluxuations, which is proveably possible. No pockets, no gas. Those are molecules. Have to get to Plank-level stuff where time and distance are irrelevant!
@@BigDaddy-yp4mi provably possible? let's start from why should we assume that the quantum mechanics existed before the big bang? and then the lead question of why even if the quantum mechanics would have existed before it, where did they came from? the quantum mechanics did it-rhetorics is just moving the goal posts so far we can pretend not to see them anymore, and that is not good science.
Observation. That is it, we observe and realize that we're nothing but blink in time.
Hawking Radiation on black holes.
Nothing is abstract, and what’s abstract appears as nothing. Without the abstract, something could not be clearly seen in crowded field of all of the something’s. Thoughts are abstract; Love is abstract; peace is abstract; mathematics are abstract; ideas are abstract, but without them something’s cannot be defined, categorized, or known.
Meth
How can something happen before time existed? How can an event start without space or time? My brain hurt
WE WERE WRONG. AINT THAT A SUPRISE 😂😂😂
UNIVERSE IS REAL
One thing I hate is when scientists insist that there was no "before" for the big bang because time itself started with it. I say BULL CRAP to that. There is ALWAYS a before even if we don't know what happened before. We may never know what happened before but that should be admitted instead of copping out by saying "before" does not exist at all.
It's a conclusion drawn from Einstein's theory of relativity. Since space and time aren't separate but are one conjoined facet of reality you cant have one without the other. If there was no space before the big bang then there could not have been any time to exist either. That's my layman's understanding of the matter, I don't claim to understand the maths behind it all.
If you believe that you know more about physics than Einstein I would encourage you to educate yourself more on the matter and see how you feel with new information on board. I'd particularly recommend starting with "Why Does E=mc²" by Brian Cox, PBS Space Time also have some good videos on relativity
I know it's hard to believe, but if you learn quantum mechanics, you will begin to understand that to comprehend reality we need to throw away our deterministic 'logical' monkey brains and look at the theory, maths and experimental evidence.
Learn quantum mechanics and relativity. Massless particles do not experience time the same way we do. To our understanding, massless particles like light do not experience time at all and Einstein proved this! At quantum scales, virtual particles pop into and out of existence all the time (again, proven by experiment and we even have engineering ) and cause/effect breaks down.
To say "There is ALWAYS a before" is only valid to say in this universe where time has meaning! Time only affects 'mass particles' such as us, that's why we exist and time itself was created at the big bang, so before it has no meaning in spacetime. There is NOT "ALWAYS a before." and in fact science has shown it's unnecessary.
Stephen Hawking’s “No boundary” proposal.
Your rejection is just because you don’t understand how underlying reality may differ greatly from what our brains are constructed to perceive.
In fact that’s not the dominant cosmogenesis theory today but only because a ”better“ one was found - “eternal Inflation” - that helps to explain the homogeneity and isotropy of the universe.
I still vastly prefer Hawking’s proposal. Which is indeed a possible spacetime geometry according to General Relativity. It’s not in any way inevitable that there was a “before”. Spacetime could be curved so tightly near the singularity that it’s rounded off like the surface of a sphere. As Hawking put it: there’s nowhere that’s North of the North Pole.
@@invocalyptic8796Einstein was a fraud and anybody preaching his relativity nonsense knows nothing about the reality of this universe.
@@invocalyptic8796 Einstein's theory of relativity is wrong despite so called scientists worshiping it as their bible. It's a math scribbling and math is not reality but they don't seem to be aware of that. In math you can say anything like zero or infinity or the speed of light is a constant which causes time to become zero and mass to become infinity if you attempt to exceed it. It's nonsense
The Big Bang = Turning on the video game
Wish good enough to exist
What is nothing anyway? What is it going to do for you today? The Universe is here now. You are here now. USE IT!!!.
I don't really believe that reality itself is real.
I have spent many years studying the various interpretations of quantum physics, general relativity, the different attempts to come up with a “theory of everything” and the many theories about the origin and cause of the Big Bang and whether there was anything before.
And I agree with you.
We have been looking for the nature of the base level, underlying reality which can be decomposed no further, and out of which everything can be built.
The current standard answer is “quantum fields”. But this doesn’t tell us where quantum fields come from.
I think Steven Weinberg came very close when he proposed that the underpinning of quantum mechanics is pure information. “It from bit”, he said.
But who decides WHAT Information? Why this universe rather than any other one?
And if a Universe is ultimately just information, what is the difference between the one that’s “Real” and those that are merely alternative possibilities?
I have long been convinced that every possible universe is an equal contender. Each universe is the only real universe - as far as it’s inhabitants are concerned.
There is no objective difference. It’s entirely subjective. So objectively, there is no such thing as reality.
Every universe is just one story out of an infinite book of possible stories.
The Big Bang.
Was this channel always named ENR?
i also wonder that. I'm subbed but idk who this is
@@melissawiekharvey5037 yeah same. I don’t remember the channels name but I knew some of the videos
Maybe because I thought it had a different name to I may be suffering from the Mandela effect but I think it was always enr
The universe is like me. Brilliant and beautiful.
You mean Massive and Weird..😂😂
Big bang? Ultra massive blackhole sucked everything up, it was a huge star that went super nova and pulled matter into this our universe. I believe it's either a multiverse or a simulation. 😅
"Mearly a convenient way of expressing that we dont know for sure"....no its not??? You ever heard of a singularity in a black hole?? We know that TONS of information can be fit inside a TTEEEENNY point.. im pretty sure we started as a giant black hole that somehow exploded
The more condensed an object, the more gravity it generates in this universe. Neutron stars are stripped neutrons packed together which themselves generate enormous gravity,. But neutrons are not the most elemental particles since they can be broken apart into electrons and other elemental particles that cannot be broken down any further. So if those elemental particles were packed together, you would get a black hole that won't even allow photons to escape.There is nothing magic about it and there's no way a giant black hole could spontaneously occur in "nothing". Black holes require energy and matter to be created and they're just examples of overwhelming gravitational force.
Big Bang or call it what you may. God can do what ever it was, is, or gonna be.
Don't confuse emptiness with nothingness
well that's something
Just another history lesson like most of this channels videos. Nothing about how the universe started from nothing.
That's because no one knows Science doesn't explain it nor does Religion
Okay folks I'm planing Thanksgiving dinner this year, just wondering dose any one know the equivalent gas mark for 7 trillion degrees f is and is that sufficient heat for my turkey.
27:00 One Helium atom equal four Hydrogen atoms! Wrong! Atomic number of Helium is two.
Lucky777
Maybe the universe appeared instantly when the simulation went live. ( “begin simulation” button was pushed).
How did the universe that your machine exists in get created?
Sail across space? How does it sail across something that doesn't exist?
To think the universe arise from nothing is illogical. If nothing or nothingness is or was real, then there wouldn't be anything now. Even a temporary nothing or nothingness would not be observable in any way. If an idea is illogical, then it isn't true.
It sure feels like science is having a difficult time rationalizing bbt.
Dumbest thing I've read today. Scientists dont sit around trying to rationalize theories in science. A Theory is held up by a mountain of evidence. No scientist is trying to rationalize Nuclear Theory. Or Germ Theory. Or The Theory of Tectonic Plates. Or the Theory of Evolution ect. That's shit that the uneducated do when they simply dont understand science. Like yourself. 😂😂😂😂😂
what is bbt?
@@curtcoller3632probably BigBangTheory bud lol
"The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has not disproved the Big Bang, despite an article about a pseudoscientific theory that went viral in August, and which mischaracterized quotes from an astrophysicist to create a false narrative that the Big Bang didn't happen.
Worse still, the article had taken what Kirkpatrick had told Nature and misused it out of context to give the false impression that astrophysicists were panicking over the thought of the Big Bang theory being wrong.
The author of the article, an independent researcher named Eric Lerner, has been a serial denier of the Big Bang since the late 1980s, preferring his personal pseudoscientific alternative.
"I saw it and thought 'This is horrible, but it's also nonsense, nobody is going to read this,'" Kirkpatrick said. "The next thing I know, everybody has read it!""
In the beginning (time) God created the heaven (space) and the earth (matter) . That is the answer, that is a fact .
All secular science has to say about it is -maybe-might-could-possibly-theoretically-ect. “Because science is always changing“ Gods word never changes.
That's a fact? Prove it.
Yes I agree but how was God made and why if you honest with yourself nothing makes sense
its older then 13.7 .. they say they can see 24.6 billion .. but its even older then that
Why tf you are uploading videos from OTHER CREATORS ?????
Sleep well everyone ✨
Why does the narrator say that the universe came from nothing. Not even physicists make this claim. If we accept the big bang hypothesis, then it came from a singularity, which is not nothing.
The Big Bang.69 gold Lucky 777
Soooooo they pretty much know nothing about how something comes from absolutely nothing? Well I'll be 😅
"One can never reduce entropy"...
Yes you can, but it requires work.
As for the universe being an "open system", meaning it's affected by external factors, what would that be?
Entropy in the universe is only increasing.
Whether or not the universe is an open system is a matter of debate among physicists.
In thermodynamics, an open system is one that can exchange both energy and matter with its surroundings. A closed system can exchange energy but not matter, and an isolated system cannot exchange either.
If the universe is infinite, then it has no surroundings and therefore cannot be an open system. However, if the universe is finite, then it is possible that it could exchange energy and matter with another universe, or with some other kind of external environment.
There is some evidence to suggest that the universe may be finite. For example, the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is the remnant radiation from the Big Bang, appears to be uniform in all directions, which suggests that the universe is curved. A curved universe is more likely to be finite than a flat universe.
However, there is also evidence to suggest that the universe may be infinite. For example, the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. This acceleration is thought to be caused by dark energy, which is a mysterious force that makes up about 70% of the universe.
If the universe is infinite, then it is almost certainly a closed system. However, if the universe is finite, then it is possible that it could be an open system.
Whether or not the universe is an open system has important implications for our understanding of the universe's evolution and future. For example, if the universe is a closed system, then the total amount of energy and matter in the universe will always remain the same. However, if the universe is an open system, then it is possible that the total amount of energy and matter in the universe could change over time.
Ultimately, the question of whether or not the universe is an open system is still unanswered. However, it is a question that physicists are actively working to answer.
I always chuckle when an infinite universe is described as a "closed" system. Just the assertion of an infinite space implies an infinite time scale. In any infinite spacetime, the entropy of that spacetime would have reached a maximum value an infinite time ago! For that reason, the universe cannot be infinite spacially or temporally. The same logic applies to an infinity of multiverses. Unless one is willing to make the ridiculous assertion of an infinite regression of causality, the only reasonable postulate for existence is creation ex nihlo.
@@SuperiorDavethanks for the information. 👍
or , an easier way to understand this . lol
I'm glad that more and more physicists now admit all the nonsense:
1. BIG BANG
2. Infinity makes no sense in their equations
3. Particle physics is on the wrong track
and much much more. All things a predicted for decades. I was completely ignored and now they slowly get it!
I am glad to see you're talking rubbish.
And you are...what? History teacher, or have at least a degree from Physics and understand standard and particle models? Have you published any papers to make claims that Big Bang is "nonsense" when we can literally see it?
I guess you posted many papers? Can we see it or is it some bro science you debated in bar-not saying its something wrond with bar debated its a great debate if you have friends like that but you making those claims I hope you at least have a degree od physics?
The Web telescope just proved that all these theories are wrong. It found fully developed galaxies at the farthest regions of,the universe. Physicists are going to have to start all over.
Nope. You’re wrong. Stop reading clickbait science articles.
"He is the Only True God in the heavens and the earth. He knows whatever you conceal and whatever you reveal, and knows whatever you do.Whenever a sign comes to them from their Lord, they turn away from it.They have indeed rejected the truth when it came to them, so they will soon face the consequences of their ridicule. " Al Quran 6:4 - 6
While nothing does not exist...
It does because nothing is still something. We do not live in a universe where absolute nothing exists.
@zethloveless7238 that's why the 3 dots at the end of the sentence. It was sarcastic.
It’s gonna have new Big Bang?
Can something come from nothing?
Just like how this video arose from nothing, because of consioseness. Now where did consiousness arise? From nothing, but how? because of ... nevermind this is a tail chasing exercise isnt it? But i gave up my tail long ago... long ago...
En the end en jo end
Im sorry I love you.
The narration is the same blah blah blah but the graphics are outstanding! 🤯😳😃🤩🫢😲🌞💫🌟⭐💥👍🙌🤲🫶🤌✌️🤙🚶🏃🤸
Turns out we had no idea how old the universe was, thanks to the JWST. I’m not buying the Big Bang theory
ya all those dude could not say for fact.. they are so wrong .. big bang was a star popping .. so there billions of them
😢😢And who cares if you dont accept the Big Bang Theory?? No one gives 2 shits. All of the professionals (astrophysicists and astronomers) whose life work is to gather and access the mountain of evidence collected certainly dont give a shit when you stand up in the middle of class to proclaim your ignorance. Heres the kicker. However you think the universe came to be...you dont have not a single piece of scientific evidence to back it up. Not a single piece. All the evidence gathered by mankind throughout history shows that the Big Bang was the cause for our universe to come into being. You may believe whatever you like but you dont have a shred of evidence for it Kevin. 😤
There was no big bang. The only bang that ever happened was in our bedroom between my girlfriend and me. We bang good. 👍
Agreed 👍
😅
It can't. But when your default setting is to deny God at any cost, you'll dream up any number of ridiculous theories to fill that faith gap.
I think you just spoke on your own religion. The one you have 0 proof for.
@@zethloveless7238 I don't require any, that's how faith works. But then, that's how it often works on your side too.
@@briankgarland delusional. God of the gaps
@@zethloveless7238 You'll be ok, Spanky. With age will come wisdom.
@@briankgarland bro I’m already old fym 🤣. Enjoy your got of the gaps and magical faith tho little bud.
To say the universe came about through nothing is absolutely absurd. We are so so so far from finding the answer using the scientific method.
Doesn't quite sound scientific, does it?
At some point something comes from nothing whether it’s a supreme god or a multiversal equation, either case was created by nothing. So it’s not as hard of a concept to grasp as people make it out to be
Absolute nothing does not exist in our universe, therefore nothing is still actually something. Virtual particles popping in and out of existence.
😆😂🤣
Quantum information, Quantum entanglement,
Are, fundamental, underlying of Reality.
Quantum Mind emerge, Quantum Body emerge,
Mind and Body entanglement.. Consciousness emerge.
Spacetime emerge, Holographic principal
Or belejens
Nice documentary bacteria, what kind are you... I'm just kidding...dark energy really I said it before it doesn't exist otherwise galaxy's wouldn't exist...
Wrong
Can nothing really create something ? ...sounds pretty impossible.
Nothing is in fact Something. Virtual particles popping in and out of existence. Absolute nothing doesn’t exist in our universe. It’s actually fairly simple to understand.
Easy, God. 😊
🤣🤣🤣
That literally would explain nothing whatsoever
Gravity is not a force.
but has been measured
@@andygaalgravity is the result of acceleration. Acceleration can be measured. Acceleration is a force so gravity can considered as the result of one frame of reference accelerating another frame of reference.
Modern science is the same as religion you need faith and to believe in things that maybe are there or maybe not..
This is the most idiotic statement I have read all day. Thank you!
@@Ninja76100 Yeah i can feel your beta vibe from here. Do what you are told.
@@Lendario1xRespectfully I agree with your statement in part, but not when applied wholly. Parts of science do require the same belief and lack of true understanding to the point where the belief in God is about the same as some magical creation of the universe. Big Bang Theory and modern scientific beliefs ultimately come down to a creation we don't understand. The big bang and subsequent impossible to explain circumstances are just about the same as a god creating an in motion universe that appears to be older than it is. However, science does not assume things, stay the same, or make wild beliefs without any evidence. It picks the best and newest evidence. Science is not a single belief, it is an attitude and a perspective that evolves. So religious creation should be at the least respected as possible at the core of things. However, science may or may not disprove this eventually. So the important thing is to realize we need to be scientific and continue to question and learn about our reality, regardless of whether we explore religion. So I don't believe "this is the most idiotic statement I've read all day". I believe your original intent and meaning is absolutely true, and an important point/argument. The important part is not that anyone completely agrees with it or believes in it more than another. The important part and why it is so valuable is that it shows there is a valid argument that nobody ever considered. But you absolutely should not equate religion to being better than science or to it being fine as a sole method of understanding the world. It is something to use as an additional adventure, but it must be admitted that science is needed to find truths that will hopefully find the truth some day. I believe you should reword your comment next time. Instead of using it to argue religion vs science, make the main point about religion being a valid belief to explore that is not excluded within science. Make sure to continue that science may prove or disprove religion, but science should be the core of our understanding either way.
this is full of false facts it is not even funny not to mention the pronunciations is laughable new heights becomes new hates ?
We don't even no what dark matter is or dark energy is empty space haz always bin there
The Big Bang.