The greatest loss to humanity was the prophet Muhammad Sallahu Alayhi Wassalam returning to Allah SWT, may Allah grant him happiness in Jannah with Abu Bakr Ra, Umar Ra, Uthman Ra, Ali Ra, Aisha RA and all the companions and mothers of the believers may Allah bless and show mercy to them all
I'm pretty sure in their mosques they try and teach them how to prove shiaism is correct and don't teach them the actual quran or sunnah of the phrophet
@@rcmysm9123 Ahlul Bayt never did matm never did they call upon Ali R.A. or Abbas R.A. or anyone. Ayesha R.A. is also a part of the Ahlul Bayt. Allah only mentioned the wives as part of the Ahl Bayt in Quran.
@@rft9776 Aisha herself narrates whom the purification part of ayat 33:33 refers to. The 5 under Al-kisa, now show one single time ANY of the wives said it referred to one of them. Why do you refute Aisha?
@@rft9776 You don't even believe your own "sahih" hadith. Yazid b. Hayyan reported: We went to him (Zaid b. Arqam) and said to him. You have found goodness (for you had the honour) to live in the company of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and offered prayer behind him, and the rest of the hadith is the same but with this variation of wording that lie said: Behold, for I am leaving amongst you two weighty things, one of which is the Book of Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, and that is the rope of Allah. He who holds it fast would be on right guidance and he who abandons it would be in error, and in this (hadith) these words are also found: We said: Who are amongst the members of the household? AREN'T THE WIVES (of the Holy Prophet) INCLUDED AMONGST THE MEMBERS OF HIS HOUSEHOLD? THEREUPON HE SAID: NO, by Allah, a woman lives with a man (as his wife) for a certain period; he then divorces her and she goes back to her parents and to her people; the members of his household include his ownself and his kith and kin (who are related to him by blood) and for him the acceptance of Zakat is prohibited. حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَكَّارِ بْنِ الرَّيَّانِ، حَدَّثَنَا حَسَّانُ، - يَعْنِي ابْنَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ - عَنْ سَعِيدٍ، - وَهُوَ ابْنُ مَسْرُوقٍ - عَنْ يَزِيدَ بْنِ حَيَّانَ، عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ أَرْقَمَ، قَالَ دَخَلْنَا عَلَيْهِ فَقُلْنَا لَهُ لَقَدْ رَأَيْتَ خَيْرًا . لَقَدْ صَاحَبْتَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَصَلَّيْتَ خَلْفَهُ . وَسَاقَ الْحَدِيثَ بِنَحْوِ حَدِيثِ أَبِي حَيَّانَ غَيْرَ أَنَّهُ قَالَ " أَلاَ وَإِنِّي تَارِكٌ فِيكُمْ ثَقَلَيْنِ أَحَدُهُمَا كِتَابُ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ هُوَ حَبْلُ اللَّهِ مَنِ اتَّبَعَهُ كَانَ عَلَى الْهُدَى وَمَنْ تَرَكَهُ كَانَ عَلَى ضَلاَلَةٍ " . وَفِيهِ فَقُلْنَا مَنْ أَهْلُ بَيْتِهِ نِسَاؤُهُ قَالَ لاَ وَايْمُ اللَّهِ إِنَّ الْمَرْأَةَ تَكُونُ مَعَ الرَّجُلِ الْعَصْرَ مِنَ الدَّهْرِ ثُمَّ يُطَلِّقُهَا فَتَرْجِعُ إِلَى أَبِيهَا وَقَوْمِهَا أَهْلُ بَيْتِهِ أَصْلُهُ وَعَصَبَتُهُ الَّذِينَ حُرِمُوا الصَّدَقَةَ بَعْدَهُ . Reference : Sahih Muslim 2408d In-book reference : Book 44, Hadith 58 USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 31, Hadith 5923 (deprecated numbering scheme)
Btother Shamsi i thank you for enlighting me abt the various issues when you deal with shias and non believers..thankyou once again..may Allah reward you here and hereafter. Love and blessings from Kashmir....
Pray for these kids. They don't know any better. That sweet boy with the glasses looks like my young cousin. To think he's being spoon fed this dangerous garbage is so sad to see.
Muhammed did not died, so how could he not died? İs it possible he is alive? And the fisch who remarkable came to live and isa who did not died is it possible for humans to understand? So who allah gave a light who walks in the light? Sunni islam is completed after bukhari book.
These two shiias brought Aysha(RA) action as their evidence ?? when they curse her and spit on her name and plan to dig out her grave and flog her skeletont?? really ??
Muhammed did not died, so how could he not died? İs it possible he is alive? And the fisch who remarkable came to live and isa who did not died is it possible for humans to understand? So who allah gave a light who walks in the light? Sunni islam is completed after bukhari book.
shia keep saying we follow ahl al bayt but at the same time all the things they do ahl al bayt never done , like we know faitma peace upon her used to pray all night and read the quran why dont they follow that?
Scholars agree that: Matthew and Mark are generally thought to have been written first, with Matthew being dated to around AD 70-80 and Mark to around AD 65-70. Luke is thought to have been written slightly later, around AD 80-90, and John is believed to have been written last, around AD 90-100 ALSO, *a overwhelming majority of SCHOLARS* who hold the view that *the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or associates of Jesus.* Here are a few examples: 1. Richard Bauckham, a New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He writes, "The Gospels are fundamentally based on testimony that comes to us from the first generation of Christian eyewitnesses" (Jesus and the Eyewitnesses, p. 1). 2. Craig Blomberg, a New Testament scholar, believes that at least some of the Gospel authors were eyewitnesses or close associates of Jesus. He states, "I believe that at least some of the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or close associates of eyewitnesses" (The Historical Reliability of the Gospels, p. 45). 3. Darrell Bock, a New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by those who were closely associated with Jesus. He writes, "The Gospels are generally viewed as coming from those who were closely associated with Jesus, including his disciples and those who followed them" (Studying the Historical Jesus, p. 99). 4. F.F. Bruce, a biblical scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The Gospels were written by men who were either eyewitnesses themselves or who obtained their information from eyewitnesses" (The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?, p. 17). 5. N.T. Wright, a prominent New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by those who were "in the thick of things" with Jesus. He writes, "The Gospels are indeed testimony, and they come from people who were in the thick of things, who knew what was going on, who were part of the movement from the beginning" (Jesus and the Victory of God, p. 469). 6. Andreas Köstenberger, a New Testament scholar, believes that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The Gospels are based on eyewitness testimony and written by those who either were eyewitnesses themselves or had access to eyewitnesses" (The Heresy of Orthodoxy, p. 52). 7. Michael Licona, a New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by individuals who were either eyewitnesses or had access to eyewitness testimony. He writes, "The Gospels were written by people who were either eyewitnesses themselves or who had access to eyewitness testimony" (The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach, p. 315). 8. Simon Gathercole, a biblical scholar, believes that the Gospels were written by those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The most plausible explanation is that the Gospels are based on testimony, that is, on the accounts of those who were there and saw or heard what happened" (The Gospel of Thomas: Introduction and Commentary, p. 19). 9. Craig Evans, a New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He writes, "It is generally agreed that the Gospels are based on eyewitness testimony or, at least, on the testimony of those who knew the eyewitnesses" (Jesus and His Contemporaries, p. 23). 10. Peter J. Williams, a biblical scholar, believes that the Gospels were written by those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The most plausible explanation for the Gospels is that they are based on the testimony of those who were there" (Can We Trust the Gospels?, p. 26). 11. Richard Swinburne, a philosopher of religion, argues that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or associates of Jesus. He writes, "It is very likely that the Gospels were written by people who were at least close associates of those who had seen and heard Jesus" (The Resurrection of God Incarnate, p. 161). 12. Craig Keener, a New Testament scholar, believes that the Gospels were written by those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The Gospels are based on eyewitness testimony or reliable traditions derived from eyewitnesses" (The Historical Jesus of the Gospels, p. 61). There are a TON more SCHOLARS that agree with those, let me know if you want some more names.
Bro your book is cursing Jesus so have some shame man you are not only making him God but also cursing him no one cares about your book when itself making God a cursed
@@user-wb1oe7hn6q Explain to me the curse, what does it mean? What is the curse that Jesus offered to take upon himself? And now that Jesus took willingly the curse upon himself and nailed it back to the tree where it all began, what does that mean for us? Please explain to me God's plan according to the Bible and how did God accomplished that? You seem knowledgeable so please enlighten me.
@@user-wb1oe7hn6q Also we're not making him God he proclaimed himself to be God in many different ways, for example in Revelation 21-6-7 Jesus CLEARLY said by mouth that "I am God"
@@Figs4Life REALLY? 😂😂😂😂 You admit that he was cursed and want me to explain why!!!!!! You want to justify it what a shame have some love for Jesus man I don't want to know why keep it for yourself if you believe that your god was a cursed
@@Figs4LifeAlso, he is our beloved prophet Don't you dare come here and explain why he is cursed Because he is not idk you guys claim to be the followers of Jesus yet you call him a curse
The same hesitation if asked to the Christians if they were able to save Jesus in Cruxifixction would they do it or not. To a Muslim this is a no brainer.
Brother Shamsi I think should show more patient, these two people are young they don't show hate ,they seem lost especially the youngest one ... I feel so sorry for them, may Allah guide them .
@@Cisse142 Of course you don't have to feel sorry for le I'm following the path of the prophet and his compagnons , I love all of them, I love all his wives (the mothers of believes ) ,I love his family but don't worship them ,or ask them for help,I don't do mut’ah , my belief has strong evidence from the Qur’an and from the AUTHENTIC hadiths .
Muhammed did not died, so how could he not died? İs it possible he is alive? And the fisch who remarkable came to live and isa who did not died is it possible for humans to understand? So who allah gave a light who walks in the light? Sunni islam is completed after bukhari book.
Allahuakbar.. Dear Shia brother, i can understand your love for Ali (RA). I too believe that if Ali (RA) was the 1st Khalifa with Aboobaker (RA), Umar (RA), Uthman (RA) and all those noble men in his ministry the history of Islam would have been much different positively. But Allah may have other plans which he only knows. Putting all these aside I was shocked to see your response about Shamsi's question about the biggest loss of Islam. What I can say is may Allah guide you. Atleast to respond without any doubt that it was the loss of our beloved prophet Muhammad (SA).
@@rcmysm9123 muhammed saws loved Hussain so much only for his love for Hussain is enough to love hussain. Allah created everything like he wish the sunnis they love abu bakır and bukhari who completed there kuran for them so they could understand the kuran and how to pray and other medicin like mix camelmilk with camelurine uses for there Marad in the kalb. So they could know what sunnah means and that there bukhari projection of muhammed with a sunna what allah forget to menntion in the kuran. But beside that all many sunnis are great people who fear allah and spreading islam with the kuran and after sales they force bukhari ahadith books as complement to the kuran for understanding ofcourse and for there sunnah ahadith believe empowerment. Much sunnis are just following and are good people, ı think goverments like Britanya are forcing hypnosing ahadith believe on honnest sunnis. But ı think soon they wake up because they will use there own brain soon inşallah then they wil break the cross and kill the pig. And turn to the guidance of allah instead of the sunnah of bukhari muhammed.
@@rcmysm9123You know it’s not what he’s talking about. Just let me ask you this who is more important. The Prophet Muhammad (SAW) or Imam Hussain (RA)?
@@hasisahi1784I’m going to assume you have a language barrier. But you used such wrong word like Allah forgot Nauzbillah. How dare you. Think twice before writing anything. And repent to Allah.
😂 we do it out love for the final messengers pbuh grandson. What a joke these people are you don't beat yourself out of love for the one that was the prophet chosen by Allah swt, bought us islam, devoted his life to the work given, alone in times of panganism, suffered losses we couldn't imagine all to bring us islam.
However, there are some scholars who argue that certain portions of *the New Testament were written as early as the 30s AD.* For example, some scholars have suggested that the letters of Paul, such as Galatians and 1 Thessalonians, were written within 20 years of Jesus' death. One scholar who supports this position is James D.G. Dunn, who writes in his book "The New Testament: A Historical Introduction" that "it is possible to argue that *Galatians and 1 Thessalonians were written within 20 years of Jesus' death,* and that they reflect the earliest Christian thinking about Jesus." Dunn's evidence for this includes linguistic and stylistic analysis of the texts, as well as the fact that they contain no mention of the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem in 70 AD, a significant event that would likely have been referenced if the letters were written later.
@@AisyahSyiva REALLY? You have absolutely no clue what christians believe do you? Maybe you should ask a question instead of being brainwashed by Is islamist. Not only muslims give you the wrong information but even your koran gets the Christian Faith completely wrong which is a huge error.
@@AisyahSyiva God the Father didn't come to Earth, it was basically God's LIVING WORD that was flesh (Jesus). Don't be surprised that God's WORD materialized, when God created all things by his WORD in the first place. But this word is different, this is THE WORD itself, and this living WORD has live within it that has always existed with the Father for eternity. God's LIVING WORD in the same as a human word. God is non-physical and he doesn't have a mouth or vocal quartz, therefore the word it's something different and also non-physical. The Trinity in a simple explanation is this: The Father, the Father's WORD and the Father's Spirit.
@@AisyahSyiva The sacrifice that Jesus did was offering himself willingly to take someone else's place. If I sin against God and I repent and ask for forgiveness, God is merciful and he will forgive me, but if I sin against another person, unless that person forgives me, God will hold me accountable for that sin because he is the ultimate perfect just judge. IF God just lets me go free for any reason, then he is not just and fare to the person that I have sinned against. If you take me to court because you seek out justice and I told the judge that I did many other good deeds to other people throughout my lifetime and the judge was merciful and let me go free because of that, was he fare to you and a just judge? Where's your justice? But this is what God did that he was both merciful and just. The judge gave me the fine because his is just, and later he took off his work clothes, he stepped down from his work chair, and came next to me as a regular citizen and gave me the money to pay the fine himself. Like this the judge was just and at the same time I legally went free. You can say that the judge was the Father, and when he stepped down he came as Jesus. The judge didn't put anyone innocent to pay your penalty but he himself came to you, the same with the God of The Bible. Everything that we do to each other they did to Jesus Christ before you went to the cross, but because we also kill, Jesus offered himself to take your place and pay the eye for an eye of pain and agony of death if YOUR sin. Only an innocent person can offer himself to take your place. Jesus was like an empty cup that willingly offer himself to take your cup and drunk the wrath of you sins. Because WE are made of flesh, then only a human flesh can pay the penalty of an eye for an eye of justice for our sins . A dog or a rock can not pay for your sins that you did to a human being.
@@AisyahSyiva This will blow your mind and rock your world IF you read it all This is the Bible in a nutshell like you never heard it before! God-created Adam-and-Eve the 1st humans in his image. God gave them free will, even though he already knew that they would fall, but it was necessary so they can keep their free will and know right from wrong just as God. God already had a plan because he can see the beginning to end. God told them that he will send a savior to redeem them. It was necessary for God to let everything be played out in front of our eyes so they/we can see and experience ourself that wrong is destructive and leads nowhere. And that's why we have cancer, wars, kids dying and corruption. We do this to ourselves, but when the time is right, God will step in. God cannot intervene now because he will take away our free will, but as he is wise, God let everything to be played out for us to see for ourselves. God loves us so much and He wants us to be with him forever where he is, but it is impossible for us to be in his holy perfect presence because we sin. If we have sin once in our life, then we are guilty of it, that's how perfect God truly is. To us it seems nonsense but that is perfection all the way around in God. God basically gave them 2 rules: to love and to respect their creator And to love one another and do to others as we would like others do to us. That's it! Those are the laws that the 10 commandments are based on. We have all fell short by far. God is just and fair to all and because of that he must judge righteously and condem evil. So this is what God did so we can be perfect like him and be with him. God knows that there is no way someone can be perfect from birth to end, so they can be in his holy perfect presence. So this is what God did. He stepped down and stripped himself from the heavenly thrown, He became human (Jesus Christ), born fresh out of a virgin so He can have the life that we do here on Earth and go through what we go through with out sinning once! He basically fulfilled the law (10 commandments). He was tempted like we are tempted by the Devil. Whatever we do to others they did to Jesus. Jesus Christ God in the flesh, Stepped down from his heavenly throne and humble himself and became a servant, lower than low; He was mocked, falsely accused, beaten, spit on, and crucified on the tree. Adam-and-Eve ate from the forbidden cursed tree, and Jesus became a curse for us and nailed back it on the tree. Jesus by not sinning, he was an empty cup, and he offered him self to be filled with your sins, so your cup can be empty. And now you can be perfect and holy, and you can with God as he is holy and perfect. So you are saved by grace because he loved you, and not by your actions. There is absolutely nothing that you can do to buy yourself in heaven to be with a perfect God; It is a free gift; and all you have to do is to reach out and accept it!!! You can say right now, I believe and except that you died for my sins and raised from the dead and I'm free because of what you did. AND YOU ARE SAVED! as simple as that. When you are baptized you are a new creation in God. You will become God's daughter. God has many more rooms and big plans for us that will put us in charge. Can you imagine how much God loves you and you matter to him, for him to send his only be begotten Son to die for your sins? He was tempted to the point that he was sweating blood and he did not bow. Can you imagine even though he had the power to come down from the cross and say we're not worth it, His love kept him on it until the end?! That a God worthy of loving and obeying. God's love is Unconditional.
Scholars say that these apparent contradictions can be explained through careful analysis and contextual understanding. Here are some quotes from scholars who do not see the contradictions in the Bible as a problem: 1. F.F. Bruce, a biblical scholar and theologian, writes in his book "The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?": "The presence of minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions is not surprising in records emanating from so many sources and assembled by so many hands, each with his own standpoint and theological emphasis." 2. Craig Blomberg, a professor of New Testament at Denver Seminary, writes in his book "The Historical Reliability of the Gospels": "The fact that different witnesses choose to highlight different aspects of the same event or teaching is normal in any historical reporting, and it does not imply error or contradiction." 3. William Lane Craig, a philosopher and theologian, writes in his book "Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics": "The existence of alleged contradictions in the Bible is not a sufficient reason for rejecting its historical reliability. Many of these discrepancies can be plausibly explained by careful exegesis and attention to the historical context." 4. Norman Geisler, a theologian and apologist, writes in his book "When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties": "The Bible is not only reliable, but it is also remarkably so. The so-called contradictions in the Bible can often be resolved by careful analysis of the text, and in many cases, they actually support the reliability of the biblical accounts." 5. Gleason Archer, a biblical scholar and theologian, writes in his book "Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties": "The Bible is not only reliable, but it is also remarkably so. The so-called contradictions in the Bible can often be resolved by careful analysis of the text, and in many cases, they actually support the reliability of the biblical accounts." 6. Darrell Bock, a New Testament scholar and research professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, writes in his book "Breaking the Da Vinci Code": "Any honest account of past events will have minor differences in detail. Such differences do not necessarily impugn the overall trustworthiness of the account." 7. Paul Copan, a Christian philosopher and author, writes in his book "Is God a Moral Monster?": "The presence of minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions in the biblical accounts is not surprising, given the complexity of the material and the fact that different authors were writing with different audiences, purposes, and styles in mind." 8. Douglas Groothuis, a philosopher and author, writes in his book "Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith": "The so-called contradictions in the Bible can often be resolved by careful exegesis and attention to the historical context. The fact that the biblical accounts were written by different authors over a period of centuries only adds to their credibility and richness." 9. Richard Bauckham, a New Testament scholar and theologian, writes in his book "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses": "The fact that the biblical accounts of Jesus' life and teachings were transmitted orally before they were written down helps to explain some of the apparent discrepancies in the text. However, these discrepancies do not undermine the overall reliability of the accounts." 10. Michael Licona, a New Testament scholar and apologist, writes in his book "Why Are There Differences in the Gospels?": "The existence of apparent contradictions in the biblical accounts is not a reason to doubt their overall reliability. In fact, the fact that different authors were writing with different perspectives and emphases only adds to the richness and complexity of the text." Here are some more scholars who share the view that the apparent contradictions in the Bible do not undermine its reliability: 11. Edwin Yamauchi, an historian and professor of History Emeritus at Miami University, writes in his book "The Stones and the Scriptures": "The fact that there are minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions in the biblical accounts is not surprising. These were written by different authors with different perspectives and emphases. However, these differences do not undermine the overall reliability of the text." 12. Timothy Keller, a pastor and theologian, writes in his book "The Reason for God": "The presence of apparent contradictions and discrepancies in the biblical accounts is not a reason to doubt their reliability. In fact, these differences often help to highlight different aspects of the same event or teaching." 13. John Warwick Montgomery, a lawyer and theologian, writes in his book "Evidence for Faith: Deciding the God Question": "The so-called contradictions in the Bible can often be resolved by careful exegesis and attention to the historical context. These discrepancies do not undermine the overall reliability and historical accuracy of the text." 14. Gary Habermas, a New Testament scholar and apologist, writes in his book "The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ": "The presence of minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions in the biblical accounts is not surprising. These were written by different authors with different perspectives and emphases. However, these differences do not undermine the overall reliability of the text." 15. Alvin Plantinga, a philosopher and theologian, writes in his book "Warranted Christian Belief": "The presence of apparent contradictions and discrepancies in the biblical accounts is not a reason to doubt their reliability. In fact, the fact that different authors were writing with different perspectives and emphases only adds to the richness and complexity of the text." * *These scholars argue that minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions in the Bible do not undermine its overall reliability and historical accuracy. Instead, they suggest that careful analysis of the text and attention to the historical context can help to resolve many of these issues.*
Oh Christian, know that no matter how hard you try to convince us Allah has already told us you've corrupted the books with your own hands. It is no wonder thousands upon thousands of Christians are now leaving Christianity for the true religion of Jesus ie Islam.
@@Easy_Now_Star If you want to speak to me like a man with honesty, then speak to me, don't repeat Dawah scripts and sound bites to me because I will ignore you. Do you have any honest questions? Can I at least help you understand the Trinity because your Quran doesn't explain our faith correctly.
Who was the family in the muhabayla..or the family ofvthe cloak..who was made pure..? Who were tha army when the dog barked? If that makes me Rafidhi Alhamdulillah Allah will judge but none of you. Why Did the prophet(peace be upon him) not raise himself in namaaz while Imam Husein was on his back.? IMAM Husein saved Islam from the debauchery of Yazid..otherwise womsnising gambling and drunkerdness would have been rife..
Muhammed did not died, so how could he not died? İs it possible he is alive? And the fisch who remarkable came to live and isa who did not died is it possible for humans to understand? So who allah gave a light who walks in the light? Sunni islam is completed after bukhari book.
@@JustAnotherHappyGuy The Prophet ﷺ said “every newly invented matter is an innovation, every innovation is misguidance, and every misguidance is in the Hellfire.” Biddah is something which is innovated in the religion when the prophet ﷺ didn’t legislate it. The Prophet ﷺ said “Whoever introduces into our matter that which is not a part of it, will have it rejected." Eating pizza or driving a car is not part of the religion and doesn’t have anything to do with the religion. The shia guy claims hitting yourself is from the religion, if it was from the religion the prophet ﷺ would command us to do it. whatever the prophet didn’t legislate in the religion and that which was later innovated by misguided people is a biddah.
@@UPONHAQQ We Shi’as believe that whatever isn’t haram is permissible, of course there are levels such as mustahab (recommended) and makruh (discouraged). Mourning and actions that facilitate mourning is recommended according to Imam Zainulabedin (as) who was the first to hold a majlis for his Father Imam Hussain (as). All the other Imams (as) moving forward approved of the same. We Shia’s, follow Allah’s commands, our Holy Prophet (swa) and our 12 divinely appointed Imams (as). Therefore, beating our chests while we mourn isn’t forbidden but is rather recommended. What’s strange is Omar admitted that Taraweeh was his “bid’ah hasanah” yet mainstream Muslims practice it to this day. It’s concerning that the Muslim Ummah has lost the understanding of what is bid’ah versus what is permissible as people these days practice bid’ah openly and these same people claim the recommended actions such as beating the chest while mourning are bid’ah.
Prophethood is Bigger than any leadership.....Abubakr didn't say .....I am Bigger leader than anyone....he said he is just only the follower of the Prophet saws.....thus the title khaleefaturasoolullah.....Ali ra was not that knowledgeable at the time compared to Abubakr ra ....even Umar ra was not a candidate for the title......and there were hadiths or indications specified by prophet pbuh that Abubakr ra must lead the salah rather than Umar ra taking the lead in salah ......those who claim Ali ra to be a leader at the death of prophet saws..... want to wither away from the strict monotheistic beliefs and to get specific positions and titles and increase fitnah among muslim communities.....and they will go to that end when irrespective of joining with fellow muslims against the people who want islam to be at the low.....they side with them rather than the sunnis or their brothers in faith
@@rcmysm9123 First came is prophet muhammed pbuh and through him the Holy Quran and thats it.....Ali ra didn't say that Abu bakr or Umar ra are deviated.....so what power we have to say that...all of them are sahaba.....there is no Distinction or ranks
look what smoking so many cigarettes has done to brother shamsis voice. I hope by Allahs will he can overcome his addiction that is very clearly destroying and deteriorating his health
Sure it's true that Imam Ali was a Sunni, but the Prophet (AS) said, "I am the City of Knowledge, and Ali is the Door. Whoever wishes to enter the City must come through the door." So technically, Sunnis can't learn learn anything about the Prophet, the Quran, Allah and the Prayer, unless they gain the Knowledge of these things. As Huzoor used to pray himself, "Allah Grant me Beneficial Knowledge." Since Worship cannot be Sincere without Knowledge of Who You are Worshipping and since Imam Ali is the Door of Knowledge according to the Prophet's Words, Sunnis have to Submit to Imam Ali somewhere, otherwise they'll miss the entire SPiritual Reality of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and will continue teaching people a surface level Islam that is not true, and is just ritual worship.
When Ali (r.a) dead its mean the Door dei ? In quran Allah I give example lesser then mosquito wing to guide alot , " ur misguided I don't how ur brain works but that's not what Islam is ? It's was only prophet example not the religion of Islam. Whos know made up hadith ?
The greatest loss to humanity was the prophet Muhammad Sallahu Alayhi Wassalam returning to Allah SWT, may Allah grant him happiness in Jannah with Abu Bakr Ra, Umar Ra, Uthman Ra, Ali Ra, Aisha RA and all the companions and mothers of the believers may Allah bless and show mercy to them all
The fact he did not say the prophet death was a greater lost… ya mouth to the floor
Oh Shia, please wake up!!!
Leave us alone, we are not troubling you.
@@Cisse142Dont call yourself muslims than
@@Cisse142😂😂😂
I'm pretty sure in their mosques they try and teach them how to prove shiaism is correct and don't teach them the actual quran or sunnah of the phrophet
To know the Ahlul Bayt is to know the Quran and real sunnah of prophet Muhammad pbuh.
@@rcmysm9123 Ahlul Bayt never did matm never did they call upon Ali R.A. or Abbas R.A. or anyone. Ayesha R.A. is also a part of the Ahlul Bayt. Allah only mentioned the wives as part of the Ahl Bayt in Quran.
@@rft9776
Did Abu Bakr name his successor?
@@rft9776
Aisha herself narrates whom the purification part of ayat 33:33 refers to. The 5 under Al-kisa, now show one single time ANY of the wives said it referred to one of them.
Why do you refute Aisha?
@@rft9776
You don't even believe your own "sahih" hadith.
Yazid b. Hayyan reported:
We went to him (Zaid b. Arqam) and said to him. You have found goodness (for you had the honour) to live in the company of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and offered prayer behind him, and the rest of the hadith is the same but with this variation of wording that lie said: Behold, for I am leaving amongst you two weighty things, one of which is the Book of Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, and that is the rope of Allah. He who holds it fast would be on right guidance and he who abandons it would be in error, and in this (hadith) these words are also found: We said: Who are amongst the members of the household? AREN'T THE WIVES (of the Holy Prophet) INCLUDED AMONGST THE MEMBERS OF HIS HOUSEHOLD? THEREUPON HE SAID: NO, by Allah, a woman lives with a man (as his wife) for a certain period; he then divorces her and she goes back to her parents and to her people; the members of his household include his ownself and his kith and kin (who are related to him by blood) and for him the acceptance of Zakat is prohibited.
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَكَّارِ بْنِ الرَّيَّانِ، حَدَّثَنَا حَسَّانُ، - يَعْنِي ابْنَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ - عَنْ سَعِيدٍ، - وَهُوَ ابْنُ مَسْرُوقٍ - عَنْ يَزِيدَ بْنِ حَيَّانَ، عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ أَرْقَمَ، قَالَ دَخَلْنَا عَلَيْهِ فَقُلْنَا لَهُ لَقَدْ رَأَيْتَ خَيْرًا . لَقَدْ صَاحَبْتَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَصَلَّيْتَ خَلْفَهُ . وَسَاقَ الْحَدِيثَ بِنَحْوِ حَدِيثِ أَبِي حَيَّانَ غَيْرَ أَنَّهُ قَالَ " أَلاَ وَإِنِّي تَارِكٌ فِيكُمْ ثَقَلَيْنِ أَحَدُهُمَا كِتَابُ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ هُوَ حَبْلُ اللَّهِ مَنِ اتَّبَعَهُ كَانَ عَلَى الْهُدَى وَمَنْ تَرَكَهُ كَانَ عَلَى ضَلاَلَةٍ " . وَفِيهِ فَقُلْنَا مَنْ أَهْلُ بَيْتِهِ نِسَاؤُهُ قَالَ لاَ وَايْمُ اللَّهِ إِنَّ الْمَرْأَةَ تَكُونُ مَعَ الرَّجُلِ الْعَصْرَ مِنَ الدَّهْرِ ثُمَّ يُطَلِّقُهَا فَتَرْجِعُ إِلَى أَبِيهَا وَقَوْمِهَا أَهْلُ بَيْتِهِ أَصْلُهُ وَعَصَبَتُهُ الَّذِينَ حُرِمُوا الصَّدَقَةَ بَعْدَهُ .
Reference : Sahih Muslim 2408d
In-book reference : Book 44, Hadith 58
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 31, Hadith 5923
(deprecated numbering scheme)
Btother Shamsi i thank you for enlighting me abt the various issues when you deal with shias and non believers..thankyou once again..may Allah reward you here and hereafter.
Love and blessings from Kashmir....
God’s curse is upon Shamtizi
@@ShiaRafidhiAkhbariIslamAre you a Muslim?. If you say YES, then don't curse ANYBODY.
@@ahamedkabir3577 yes, the worst curse upon Aisha the mother of disbelievers
@@ahamedkabir3577he is KAFIR Son of Mutah LoL
@@ahamedkabir3577
Cursing is in the Quran, so "anybody" is not correct.
Pray for these kids. They don't know any better. That sweet boy with the glasses looks like my young cousin. To think he's being spoon fed this dangerous garbage is so sad to see.
May Allah guide them :( they look like they are so kind and nice…
Muhammed did not died, so how could he not died?
İs it possible he is alive?
And the fisch who remarkable came to live and isa who did not died is it possible for humans to understand?
So who allah gave a light who walks in the light?
Sunni islam is completed after bukhari book.
Hemdolilah I ran away😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
These two shiias brought Aysha(RA) action as their evidence ?? when they curse her and spit on her name and plan to dig out her grave and flog her skeletont?? really ??
They want to make their own religion just so they can justify sinning
He wants to talk bad about sahaba but he didnt memorize surah kawthar
@@DizoliotThey just want to do muta in peace lol😂
shi'ism is not Islam.
Sad but true
It’s a deviant satanic sect
Leave us alone we are not attacking you
@@Cisse142 so what, haqq is haqq and batil is batil.
@@Dizoliot still attacking, is that what good Muslim does?
Shamsi May Allah reward for your efforts 😢
The Algerian shamsi lion 🦁
God’s curse is upon that shaytan
Muhammed did not died, so how could he not died?
İs it possible he is alive?
And the fisch who remarkable came to live and isa who did not died is it possible for humans to understand?
So who allah gave a light who walks in the light?
Sunni islam is completed after bukhari book.
The prophet ( peace be upon him) is always no 1 .
Astaghfirullah! may Allah(swt) guide those boys.
We are guided I don't know why you think it's right to attack
Ya Ali Madad can't help....
Fakt, Like, Alhamdullila..☝🏼🤎👍🏼
He said shiaism is a different religion.good
5:25 do you remember, we debated before" Shamsi : " good I run away" .....lol
Shampsi, how can we connect with one another?
shia keep saying we follow ahl al bayt but at the same time all the things they do ahl al bayt never done , like we know faitma peace upon her used to pray all night and read the quran why dont they follow that?
Shamshi is not letting that guy yo talk what the hell
Anybody know the Quran recitation in the background?
If its not from islam, it must be bidaa!
khalas
Crazy stuff, he does not even know surah al kowthar.
Scholars agree that:
Matthew and Mark are generally thought to have been written first, with Matthew being dated to around AD 70-80 and Mark to around AD 65-70. Luke is thought to have been written slightly later, around AD 80-90, and John is believed to have been written last, around AD 90-100
ALSO, *a overwhelming majority of SCHOLARS* who hold the view that *the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or associates of Jesus.* Here are a few examples:
1. Richard Bauckham, a New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He writes, "The Gospels are fundamentally based on testimony that comes to us from the first generation of Christian eyewitnesses" (Jesus and the Eyewitnesses, p. 1).
2. Craig Blomberg, a New Testament scholar, believes that at least some of the Gospel authors were eyewitnesses or close associates of Jesus. He states, "I believe that at least some of the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or close associates of eyewitnesses" (The Historical Reliability of the Gospels, p. 45).
3. Darrell Bock, a New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by those who were closely associated with Jesus. He writes, "The Gospels are generally viewed as coming from those who were closely associated with Jesus, including his disciples and those who followed them" (Studying the Historical Jesus, p. 99).
4. F.F. Bruce, a biblical scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The Gospels were written by men who were either eyewitnesses themselves or who obtained their information from eyewitnesses" (The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?, p. 17).
5. N.T. Wright, a prominent New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by those who were "in the thick of things" with Jesus. He writes, "The Gospels are indeed testimony, and they come from people who were in the thick of things, who knew what was going on, who were part of the movement from the beginning" (Jesus and the Victory of God, p. 469).
6. Andreas Köstenberger, a New Testament scholar, believes that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The Gospels are based on eyewitness testimony and written by those who either were eyewitnesses themselves or had access to eyewitnesses" (The Heresy of Orthodoxy, p. 52).
7. Michael Licona, a New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by individuals who were either eyewitnesses or had access to eyewitness testimony. He writes, "The Gospels were written by people who were either eyewitnesses themselves or who had access to eyewitness testimony" (The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach, p. 315).
8. Simon Gathercole, a biblical scholar, believes that the Gospels were written by those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The most plausible explanation is that the Gospels are based on testimony, that is, on the accounts of those who were there and saw or heard what happened" (The Gospel of Thomas: Introduction and Commentary, p. 19).
9. Craig Evans, a New Testament scholar, argues that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He writes, "It is generally agreed that the Gospels are based on eyewitness testimony or, at least, on the testimony of those who knew the eyewitnesses" (Jesus and His Contemporaries, p. 23).
10. Peter J. Williams, a biblical scholar, believes that the Gospels were written by those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The most plausible explanation for the Gospels is that they are based on the testimony of those who were there" (Can We Trust the Gospels?, p. 26).
11. Richard Swinburne, a philosopher of religion, argues that the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses or associates of Jesus. He writes, "It is very likely that the Gospels were written by people who were at least close associates of those who had seen and heard Jesus" (The Resurrection of God Incarnate, p. 161).
12. Craig Keener, a New Testament scholar, believes that the Gospels were written by those who had access to eyewitness testimony. He states, "The Gospels are based on eyewitness testimony or reliable traditions derived from eyewitnesses" (The Historical Jesus of the Gospels, p. 61).
There are a TON more SCHOLARS that agree with those, let me know if you want some more names.
Bro your book is cursing Jesus so have some shame man you are not only making him God but also cursing him no one cares about your book when itself making God a cursed
@@user-wb1oe7hn6q Explain to me the curse, what does it mean?
What is the curse that Jesus offered to take upon himself?
And now that Jesus took willingly the curse upon himself and nailed it back to the tree where it all began, what does that mean for us?
Please explain to me God's plan according to the Bible and how did God accomplished that?
You seem knowledgeable so please enlighten me.
@@user-wb1oe7hn6q Also we're not making him God he proclaimed himself to be God in many different ways, for example in Revelation 21-6-7 Jesus CLEARLY said by mouth that "I am God"
@@Figs4Life REALLY? 😂😂😂😂 You admit that he was cursed and want me to explain why!!!!!! You want to justify it what a shame have some love for Jesus man I don't want to know why keep it for yourself if you believe that your god was a cursed
@@Figs4LifeAlso, he is our beloved prophet Don't you dare come here and explain why he is cursed Because he is not idk you guys claim to be the followers of Jesus yet you call him a curse
I saw Jesús Christ in standing the background
🤯
The same hesitation if asked to the Christians if they were able to save Jesus in Cruxifixction would they do it or not. To a Muslim this is a no brainer.
Brother Shamsi I think should show more patient, these two people are young they don't show hate ,they seem lost especially the youngest one ...
I feel so sorry for them, may Allah guide them .
They are arrogant and should be humbled.
@@dm_1236how
Don't feel sorry for us, we don't feel sorry for you because that's your choice but we don't agree with what you believe
@@Cisse142
Of course you don't have to feel sorry for le I'm following the path of the prophet and his compagnons , I love all of them, I love all his wives (the mothers of believes ) ,I love his family but don't worship them ,or ask them for help,I don't do mut’ah , my belief has strong evidence from the Qur’an and from the AUTHENTIC hadiths .
Muhammed did not died, so how could he not died?
İs it possible he is alive?
And the fisch who remarkable came to live and isa who did not died is it possible for humans to understand?
So who allah gave a light who walks in the light?
Sunni islam is completed after bukhari book.
I'm sorry but if you cant recite suraht al kawthar, you have no business debating as a muslim at speakers corner
Allahuakbar..
Dear Shia brother, i can understand your love for Ali (RA). I too believe that if Ali (RA) was the 1st Khalifa with Aboobaker (RA), Umar (RA), Uthman (RA) and all those noble men in his ministry the history of Islam would have been much different positively. But Allah may have other plans which he only knows.
Putting all these aside I was shocked to see your response about Shamsi's question about the biggest loss of Islam. What I can say is may Allah guide you. Atleast to respond without any doubt that it was the loss of our beloved prophet Muhammad (SA).
Sunni only believe muhammed died like there other big innovators
Our prophet pbuh said
"Hussain is from me and I am FROM Hussain."
So why are you disputing this?
@@rcmysm9123 muhammed saws loved Hussain so much only for his love for Hussain is enough to love hussain.
Allah created everything like he wish the sunnis they love abu bakır and bukhari who completed there kuran for them so they could understand the kuran and how to pray and other medicin like mix camelmilk with camelurine uses for there Marad in the kalb.
So they could know what sunnah means and that there bukhari projection of muhammed with a sunna what allah forget to menntion in the kuran.
But beside that all many sunnis are great people who fear allah and spreading islam with the kuran and after sales they force bukhari ahadith books as complement to the kuran for understanding ofcourse and for there sunnah ahadith believe empowerment.
Much sunnis are just following and are good people, ı think goverments like Britanya are forcing hypnosing ahadith believe on honnest sunnis.
But ı think soon they wake up because they will use there own brain soon inşallah then they wil break the cross and kill the pig.
And turn to the guidance of allah instead of the sunnah of bukhari muhammed.
@@rcmysm9123You know it’s not what he’s talking about. Just let me ask you this who is more important. The Prophet Muhammad (SAW) or Imam Hussain (RA)?
@@hasisahi1784I’m going to assume you have a language barrier. But you used such wrong word like Allah forgot Nauzbillah. How dare you. Think twice before writing anything. And repent to Allah.
شمسي اسد السنه ❤🇸🇦♥️🇩🇿
and can any one tell me why every country shias rule get destroyed? iraq lebanon iran yaman syria
These Shia doughnuts get everything all twisted. 😢😢😢 First look at your Mutah Law, then we can talk.
May Allah protect innocent Muslim family😔
and other innocent family😔too in Pakistan
Pakistan stop kidnapped and kiilled innocent family😔
Pakistan is a developing country that is unstable.
6:53 seriously, he does not even know surah Al Kawthar?
If prophet Muhammad SWAS was alive then Hussain RA wouldn’t be killed .
These Shia's , having the backing of UK govt, you can not enter a Shia mosques without I.d, no sunni can enter.
ya Ali CANNOT madad
Haha !
Really who called Moula Ali to khyber?
@@abbasalivanat6412 ??? LoL
✅✅✅✅✅
The liar still won't say who was under Al-kisa when the purification part of 33:33 was revealed.
ممكن تخلي ترجمة
British citizens debate each other about their feelings how upgrade their feelings in speaks coner
The Shia can beat themselves up as much as they want! Saves us doing it for them 😂
Where there shia at the time of prophet
Shamsi -: Ask him😂😂😂😂4.27
If beating was from Islam the Sahaba would have beat themselves up when the prophet was beaten up in taif
😂 we do it out love for the final messengers pbuh grandson. What a joke these people are you don't beat yourself out of love for the one that was the prophet chosen by Allah swt, bought us islam, devoted his life to the work given, alone in times of panganism, suffered losses we couldn't imagine all to bring us islam.
However, there are some scholars who argue that certain portions of *the New Testament were written as early as the 30s AD.* For example, some scholars have suggested that the letters of Paul, such as Galatians and 1 Thessalonians, were written within 20 years of Jesus' death.
One scholar who supports this position is James D.G. Dunn, who writes in his book "The New Testament: A Historical Introduction" that "it is possible to argue that *Galatians and 1 Thessalonians were written within 20 years of Jesus' death,* and that they reflect the earliest Christian thinking about Jesus." Dunn's evidence for this includes linguistic and stylistic analysis of the texts, as well as the fact that they contain no mention of the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem in 70 AD, a significant event that would likely have been referenced if the letters were written later.
christian logic, God become baby, got breastfeed and someone change his nappy 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@AisyahSyiva REALLY? You have absolutely no clue what christians believe do you? Maybe you should ask a question instead of being brainwashed by Is islamist. Not only muslims give you the wrong information but even your koran gets the Christian Faith completely wrong which is a huge error.
@@AisyahSyiva God the Father didn't come to Earth, it was basically God's LIVING WORD that was flesh (Jesus).
Don't be surprised that God's WORD materialized, when God created all things by his WORD in the first place. But this word is different, this is THE WORD itself, and this living WORD has live within it that has always existed with the Father for eternity.
God's LIVING WORD in the same as a human word. God is non-physical and he doesn't have a mouth or vocal quartz, therefore the word it's something different and also non-physical.
The Trinity in a simple explanation is this:
The Father, the Father's WORD and the Father's Spirit.
@@AisyahSyiva The sacrifice that Jesus did was offering himself willingly to take someone else's place.
If I sin against God and I repent and ask for forgiveness, God is merciful and he will forgive me, but if I sin against another person, unless that person forgives me, God will hold me accountable for that sin because he is the ultimate perfect just judge. IF God just lets me go free for any reason, then he is not just and fare to the person that I have sinned against.
If you take me to court because you seek out justice and I told the judge that I did many other good deeds to other people throughout my lifetime and the judge was merciful and let me go free because of that, was he fare to you and a just judge? Where's your justice?
But this is what God did that he was both merciful and just. The judge gave me the fine because his is just, and later he took off his work clothes, he stepped down from his work chair, and came next to me as a regular citizen and gave me the money to pay the fine himself. Like this the judge was just and at the same time I legally went free.
You can say that the judge was the Father, and when he stepped down he came as Jesus.
The judge didn't put anyone innocent to pay your penalty but he himself came to you, the same with the God of The Bible.
Everything that we do to each other they did to Jesus Christ before you went to the cross, but because we also kill, Jesus offered himself to take your place and pay the eye for an eye of pain and agony of death if YOUR sin.
Only an innocent person can offer himself to take your place. Jesus was like an empty cup that willingly offer himself to take your cup and drunk the wrath of you sins.
Because WE are made of flesh, then only a human flesh can pay the penalty of an eye for an eye of justice for our sins . A dog or a rock can not pay for your sins that you did to a human being.
@@AisyahSyiva This will blow your mind and rock your world IF you read it all
This is the Bible in a nutshell like you never heard it before!
God-created Adam-and-Eve the 1st humans in his image.
God gave them free will, even though he already knew that they would fall, but it was necessary so they can keep their free will and know right from wrong just as God. God already had a plan because he can see the beginning to end. God told them that he will send a savior to redeem them.
It was necessary for God to let everything be played out in front of our eyes so they/we can see and experience ourself that wrong is destructive and leads nowhere. And that's why we have cancer, wars, kids dying and corruption. We do this to ourselves, but when the time is right, God will step in.
God cannot intervene now because he will take away our free will, but as he is wise, God let everything to be played out for us to see for ourselves.
God loves us so much and He wants us to be with him forever where he is, but it is impossible for us to be in his holy perfect presence because we sin.
If we have sin once in our life, then we are guilty of it, that's how perfect God truly is.
To us it seems nonsense but that is perfection all the way around in God.
God basically gave them 2 rules:
to love and to respect their creator And to love one another and do to others as we would like others do to us. That's it!
Those are the laws that the 10 commandments are based on.
We have all fell short by far.
God is just and fair to all and because of that he must judge righteously and condem evil.
So this is what God did so we can be perfect like him and be with him. God knows that there is no way someone can be perfect from birth to end, so they can be in his holy perfect presence.
So this is what God did.
He stepped down and stripped himself from the heavenly thrown,
He became human (Jesus Christ), born fresh out of a virgin so He can have the life that we do here on Earth and go through what we go through with out sinning once!
He basically fulfilled the law (10 commandments).
He was tempted like we are tempted by the Devil.
Whatever we do to others they did to Jesus.
Jesus Christ God in the flesh, Stepped down from his heavenly throne and humble himself and became a servant, lower than low; He was mocked, falsely accused, beaten, spit on, and crucified on the tree.
Adam-and-Eve ate from the forbidden cursed tree, and Jesus became a curse for us and nailed back it on the tree.
Jesus by not sinning, he was an empty cup, and he offered him self to be filled with your sins, so your cup can be empty. And now you can be perfect and holy, and you can with God as he is holy and perfect.
So you are saved by grace because he loved you, and not by your actions.
There is absolutely nothing that you can do to buy yourself in heaven to be with a perfect God; It is a free gift; and all you have to do is to reach out and accept it!!!
You can say right now, I believe and except that you died for my sins and raised from the dead and I'm free because of what you did. AND YOU ARE SAVED!
as simple as that.
When you are baptized you are a new creation in God.
You will become God's daughter.
God has many more rooms and big plans for us that will put us in charge.
Can you imagine how much God loves you and you matter to him, for him to send his only be begotten Son to die for your sins?
He was tempted to the point that he was sweating blood and he did not bow.
Can you imagine even though he had the power to come down from the cross and say we're not worth it, His love kept him on it until the end?!
That a God worthy of loving and obeying.
God's love is Unconditional.
More cultural, then An Islamic neccessity
How is the Shia name came about?
Prophet Muhammad pbuh spoke of them to Ali during theirs lifetimes.
Shia are sunni both of muslim❤
May Allah Save Muslims From Shias And Qadiyanis.
Ameen
He dont even know surah kosar wthell
The greatest Invention of mankind ? God and religion
what about taraweeh then that is bidaah
Engineer ali mirza❤
Scholars say that these apparent contradictions can be explained through careful analysis and contextual understanding.
Here are some quotes from scholars who do not see the contradictions in the Bible as a problem:
1. F.F. Bruce, a biblical scholar and theologian, writes in his book "The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?": "The presence of minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions is not surprising in records emanating from so many sources and assembled by so many hands, each with his own standpoint and theological emphasis."
2. Craig Blomberg, a professor of New Testament at Denver Seminary, writes in his book "The Historical Reliability of the Gospels": "The fact that different witnesses choose to highlight different aspects of the same event or teaching is normal in any historical reporting, and it does not imply error or contradiction."
3. William Lane Craig, a philosopher and theologian, writes in his book "Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics": "The existence of alleged contradictions in the Bible is not a sufficient reason for rejecting its historical reliability. Many of these discrepancies can be plausibly explained by careful exegesis and attention to the historical context."
4. Norman Geisler, a theologian and apologist, writes in his book "When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties": "The Bible is not only reliable, but it is also remarkably so. The so-called contradictions in the Bible can often be resolved by careful analysis of the text, and in many cases, they actually support the reliability of the biblical accounts."
5. Gleason Archer, a biblical scholar and theologian, writes in his book "Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties": "The Bible is not only reliable, but it is also remarkably so. The so-called contradictions in the Bible can often be resolved by careful analysis of the text, and in many cases, they actually support the reliability of the biblical accounts."
6. Darrell Bock, a New Testament scholar and research professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, writes in his book "Breaking the Da Vinci Code": "Any honest account of past events will have minor differences in detail. Such differences do not necessarily impugn the overall trustworthiness of the account."
7. Paul Copan, a Christian philosopher and author, writes in his book "Is God a Moral Monster?": "The presence of minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions in the biblical accounts is not surprising, given the complexity of the material and the fact that different authors were writing with different audiences, purposes, and styles in mind."
8. Douglas Groothuis, a philosopher and author, writes in his book "Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith": "The so-called contradictions in the Bible can often be resolved by careful exegesis and attention to the historical context. The fact that the biblical accounts were written by different authors over a period of centuries only adds to their credibility and richness."
9. Richard Bauckham, a New Testament scholar and theologian, writes in his book "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses": "The fact that the biblical accounts of Jesus' life and teachings were transmitted orally before they were written down helps to explain some of the apparent discrepancies in the text. However, these discrepancies do not undermine the overall reliability of the accounts."
10. Michael Licona, a New Testament scholar and apologist, writes in his book "Why Are There Differences in the Gospels?": "The existence of apparent contradictions in the biblical accounts is not a reason to doubt their overall reliability. In fact, the fact that different authors were writing with different perspectives and emphases only adds to the richness and complexity of the text."
Here are some more scholars who share the view that the apparent contradictions in the Bible do not undermine its reliability:
11. Edwin Yamauchi, an historian and professor of History Emeritus at Miami University, writes in his book "The Stones and the Scriptures": "The fact that there are minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions in the biblical accounts is not surprising. These were written by different authors with different perspectives and emphases. However, these differences do not undermine the overall reliability of the text."
12. Timothy Keller, a pastor and theologian, writes in his book "The Reason for God": "The presence of apparent contradictions and discrepancies in the biblical accounts is not a reason to doubt their reliability. In fact, these differences often help to highlight different aspects of the same event or teaching."
13. John Warwick Montgomery, a lawyer and theologian, writes in his book "Evidence for Faith: Deciding the God Question": "The so-called contradictions in the Bible can often be resolved by careful exegesis and attention to the historical context. These discrepancies do not undermine the overall reliability and historical accuracy of the text."
14. Gary Habermas, a New Testament scholar and apologist, writes in his book "The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ": "The presence of minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions in the biblical accounts is not surprising. These were written by different authors with different perspectives and emphases. However, these differences do not undermine the overall reliability of the text."
15. Alvin Plantinga, a philosopher and theologian, writes in his book "Warranted Christian Belief": "The presence of apparent contradictions and discrepancies in the biblical accounts is not a reason to doubt their reliability. In fact, the fact that different authors were writing with different perspectives and emphases only adds to the richness and complexity of the text."
* *These scholars argue that minor discrepancies and apparent contradictions in the Bible do not undermine its overall reliability and historical accuracy. Instead, they suggest that careful analysis of the text and attention to the historical context can help to resolve many of these issues.*
Christianity is finished,and you know it!!
nobody cares about ur pagans ritual
Oh Christian, know that no matter how hard you try to convince us Allah has already told us you've corrupted the books with your own hands. It is no wonder thousands upon thousands of Christians are now leaving Christianity for the true religion of Jesus ie Islam.
@@Easy_Now_Star If you want to speak to me like a man with honesty, then speak to me, don't repeat Dawah scripts and sound bites to me because I will ignore you.
Do you have any honest questions?
Can I at least help you understand the Trinity because your Quran doesn't explain our faith correctly.
@@Figs4Life you thought ur sect of christianity are the one that exist in this world🤣🤣🤣
But Taraweeh is not also part of religion. Khalif Umar made it into practice!
Prophet Muhammad did Tarawih!
Prophet Muhammad did not beat himself!
how is it possible you claim to be muslim, you discuss shia/sunni issues, however he doesn't know the small verses from the Quran
Who was the family in the muhabayla..or the family ofvthe cloak..who was made pure..?
Who were tha army when the dog barked?
If that makes me Rafidhi Alhamdulillah Allah will judge but none of you.
Why Did the prophet(peace be upon him) not raise himself in namaaz while Imam Husein was on his back.?
IMAM Husein saved Islam from the debauchery of Yazid..otherwise womsnising gambling and drunkerdness would have been rife..
@rft9776 why only 72 against 1000's. Numbers mean nothing. Wirld population 7billion muslim ummah 1.8 billion ..again numbers mean nothing
Muhammed did not died, so how could he not died?
İs it possible he is alive?
And the fisch who remarkable came to live and isa who did not died is it possible for humans to understand?
So who allah gave a light who walks in the light?
Sunni islam is completed after bukhari book.
Is Pizza from Islam? No. Does that mean if you eat pizza you’re going against Islam? Shamsi your logic is wrong.
you clearly dont know what biddah is
@@UPONHAQQ if it’s so clear, will you explain how I don’t know what biddah is?
@@JustAnotherHappyGuy The Prophet ﷺ said “every newly invented matter is an innovation, every innovation is misguidance, and every misguidance is in the Hellfire.” Biddah is something which is innovated in the religion when the prophet ﷺ didn’t legislate it.
The Prophet ﷺ said “Whoever introduces into our matter that which is not a part of it, will have it rejected."
Eating pizza or driving a car is not part of the religion and doesn’t have anything to do with the religion. The shia guy claims hitting yourself is from the religion, if it was from the religion the prophet ﷺ would command us to do it. whatever the prophet didn’t legislate in the religion and that which was later innovated by misguided people is a biddah.
@@UPONHAQQ We Shi’as believe that whatever isn’t haram is permissible, of course there are levels such as mustahab (recommended) and makruh (discouraged). Mourning and actions that facilitate mourning is recommended according to Imam Zainulabedin (as) who was the first to hold a majlis for his Father Imam Hussain (as). All the other Imams (as) moving forward approved of the same. We Shia’s, follow Allah’s commands, our Holy Prophet (swa) and our 12 divinely appointed Imams (as). Therefore, beating our chests while we mourn isn’t forbidden but is rather recommended.
What’s strange is Omar admitted that Taraweeh was his “bid’ah hasanah” yet mainstream Muslims practice it to this day. It’s concerning that the Muslim Ummah has lost the understanding of what is bid’ah versus what is permissible as people these days practice bid’ah openly and these same people claim the recommended actions such as beating the chest while mourning are bid’ah.
insincere liars astufrillallah
Shamsi plz learn about sunni way plz learn about islam
No shia no sunni … only Muslim…Servant of Allah and Ummati of Muhammad PBUH ❤
Prophethood is Bigger than any leadership.....Abubakr didn't say .....I am Bigger leader than anyone....he said he is just only the follower of the Prophet saws.....thus the title khaleefaturasoolullah.....Ali ra was not that knowledgeable at the time compared to Abubakr ra ....even Umar ra was not a candidate for the title......and there were hadiths or indications specified by prophet pbuh that Abubakr ra must lead the salah rather than Umar ra taking the lead in salah ......those who claim Ali ra to be a leader at the death of prophet saws..... want to wither away from the strict monotheistic beliefs and to get specific positions and titles and increase fitnah among muslim communities.....and they will go to that end when irrespective of joining with fellow muslims against the people who want islam to be at the low.....they side with them rather than the sunnis or their brothers in faith
You're completely wrong.
@@rcmysm9123 Facts and History is not wrong ....
@@anees6961
But you are
@@rcmysm9123 First came is prophet muhammed pbuh and through him the Holy Quran and thats it.....Ali ra didn't say that Abu bakr or Umar ra are deviated.....so what power we have to say that...all of them are sahaba.....there is no Distinction or ranks
@@anees6961
You're wrong.
Shamsi geting old 😊
As we all will we all die we all get sick Allah alone is free from weakness
@@isafcb312 indeed
look what smoking so many cigarettes has done to brother shamsis voice. I hope by Allahs will he can overcome his addiction that is very clearly destroying and deteriorating his health
Why are you publicizing someone else’s sins?
How do you know he smokes? Are you blindly accusing?
@@dm_1236 no it is well known shamsi doesn't hide it much u can see him smoking around outside Hyde Park very often
Shamsi shud debate Hassan Allahyari who talks alot of rubbish against sahaba
Is the kid pregnant?
Shamsi is an annoying guy to listen to...
Al-Hussein pbuh was martyred in a more violent and gruesome manner so there is no day like his day
Really
@@peacefuldecadence328 and the messenger of God’s martyrdom is the greatest calamity
Sound a bit like Christianity
@@juslearnin730 because you’re a Christian everything sounds like Christianity to you, you think that everyone is trying to copy your beliefs
Shia are not moslims
Sure it's true that Imam Ali was a Sunni, but the Prophet (AS) said, "I am the City of Knowledge, and Ali is the Door. Whoever wishes to enter the City must come through the door."
So technically, Sunnis can't learn learn anything about the Prophet, the Quran, Allah and the Prayer, unless they gain the Knowledge of these things. As Huzoor used to pray himself, "Allah Grant me Beneficial Knowledge." Since Worship cannot be Sincere without Knowledge of Who You are Worshipping and since Imam Ali is the Door of Knowledge according to the Prophet's Words, Sunnis have to Submit to Imam Ali somewhere, otherwise they'll miss the entire SPiritual Reality of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and will continue teaching people a surface level Islam that is not true, and is just ritual worship.
Learn Quran!!
Technical joey
Literally you don’t cite your sources, you just waffle. Ali loved the Sahabas, Shias hate them. You haven’t gone through the door lol
When Ali (r.a) dead its mean the Door dei ?
In quran Allah I give example lesser then mosquito wing to guide alot , " ur misguided I don't how ur brain works but that's not what Islam is ? It's was only prophet example not the religion of Islam. Whos know made up hadith ?
False hadith
Fatimid caliphate spread Islamic unto spain, al hazar university
Fatimid, 12 caliphs out of all the caliphs were ismaili imams
Shia vs Wahaabis
Shia not Muslim
Yes they are, stop attacking
الشيعة مجانين
Shia not Muslim 💯
Yes they are
@@Cisse142
The true ones
They consumed too much propaganda he was lacking basic Islamic knowledge. waste of time
You need to readjust your scope.
This is not a waste of time.
They heard this and may contemplate on it
@@Radec913 I believe the commenter was referring to the two Shia here being filled with propaganda instead Islamic basics .. not Shamsi
@@shadedlight4747you believe but you are not 100% sure so why do you think it's just a waste of time
@@Cisse142 I never said that . I was responding to the above comments .. 👆