The Persian Empire Fights Back With Full Force - Total War Rome 2 Divide Et Impera #6
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- We smashed the like target once again so here is another Alexander the great campaign part on Total War Rome 2 Divide Et Impera. Do you guys prefer the longer edits I left in the battles, let me know in the comments. If you want another episode get this video to 500 like!
twitter - / jackiefishhh
discord - / discord
Business email - jackiefishhh@gmail.com
if y’all don’t give 500 likes I will cry! Continue the series baby
i like the idea of editing the boring stuff like city building and what not ,but when watching a battle i dont like part of the battle being cut out id rather you triple speed parts of it then cutting out
but thats just my opinion
yea I'm really disappointed we didn't get to see the saving ptomeys life battle
Why is this channel so underatted :(((((( you're doing nice quality videos ! Don't stop !
You can only stop Jackie fish once you make it to India like Alexander did
Liked your PvP like this ✊ what I whould like to see if entire PvP system had the youtuber/twict community on rome make a massive PvP setup.On campaign whould be fun to see no rules best team / person wins .
Please stop editing, cutting and pkaying offcamera. We missing a lot of things.
Enjoying the series. Popping in and out of episodes..going to use ideas for my own campaign
glad to hear about the upcoming coop with daŕren
Jackie just wants to be freed from this campaign lol
Please full saga drop tommorow
Hi fish two questions. What is the base game for seven kingdoms and also can you download total War mods to cd-roms of the games. This is because I have medieval two on cd and want to get third age rise of mordor. Thanks
Spyro
Seven Kingdoms is for Total War: Attila. The Third Age issue, u can't use a CD_ROM. The only way is in your This PC>Program filesx86 or something>and in either Steam, SEGA...>
That's a big problem, with your cd issue. Sorry don't know, recommend searching a RUclips tutorial.
Fuck I been waiting for this this better get 500 fucking likes or I'm gonna be pissed love this campaign
Who would win in their nations primes? Alexander the Great or Julius Caesar?
Caesar. Undoubtedly.
Alexander cause he had the brains to not let his phalanx get flanked and also I doubt rome had calvary better than Alexander them damn 1st and 2nd champions was a serious threat
Hard to say. But I'd say Caesar, because Alexander was incredibly brave, yet also incredibly reckless. His massive wins were often due to the fact that his opposing generals just weren't that good *cough* Darius *cough* his style was more a high risk, high reward approach.
Caesar was cold, calculating, but no less brave. Yet, he didn't quite possess Alexander's recklessness, and he'd probably use that against him.
Alexander was a much more able commander than Caesar. Unlike Caesar, all that Alexander did was innovative. From his siege mechanisms to the speed of his marching was unprecedented. I'd seriously doubt that Caesar would've achieved half as much as Alexander did.
Crossing the Hindu Kush was equal to Hannibal's crossing of the Alps.
The pacification of Bactria had never been done before, no Achaemenid ruler could do it.
His Indian campaign was perhaps one of his most impressive and flawless. The way he used terror combined with kindness to subdue the Indian tribes was genius.
Plus, people give Scipio credit for dealing with Hannibals 80 elephants (African elephants and untrained), yet Alexander defeated Porus' 100 Trained, Indian elephants (Indian elephants were bigger and stronger than the African species used by Carthage), all under the monsoon rain while being outnumbered.
Here's a script from Julian the Apostate's (Roman Emperor) play called "The Caesars", Alexander and Caesar are having a debate about who is better and Alexander says:
" Nay, Caesar, you ought to have remembered those tears you shed on hearing of the monuments that had been consecrated to my glorious deeds. But since then Pompeius has inflated you with pride, Pompeius who though he was the idol of his countrymen was in fact wholly insignificant. Take his African triumph: that was no great exploit, but the feebleness of the consuls in office made it seem glorious. Then the famous Servile War was waged not against men but the vilest of slaves, and its successful issue was due to others, I mean Crassus and Lucius [ Gellius ], though Pompeius gained the reputation and the credit for it. Again, Armenia and the neighbouring provinces were conquered by Lucullus, yet for these also Pompeius triumphed. Then he became the idol of the citizens and they called him 'the Great.' Greater, I ask, than whom of his predecessors? What achievement of his can be compared with those of Marius or of the two Scipios or of Furius, who sits over there by Quirinus because he rebuilt his city when it was almost in ruins? Those men did not make their reputation at the expense of others, as happens with public buildings built at the public expense; I mean that one man lays the foundation, another finishes the work, while the last man who is in office though he has only whitewashed the walls has his name inscribed on the building. Not thus, I repeat, did those men gain credit for the deeds of others. They were themselves the creators and artificers of their schemes and deserved their illustrious titles. Well then, it is no wonder that you vanquished Pompeius, who used to scratch his head with finger-tip and in all respects was more of a fox than a lion. When he was deserted by Fortune who had so long favoured him, you easily overcame him, thus unaided. And it is evident that it was not to any superior ability of yours that you owed your victory, since after running short of provisions - no small blunder for a general to make, as I need not tell you - you fought a battle and were beaten. And if from imprudence or lack of judgement or inability to control his countrymen Pompeius neither postponed a battle when it was his interest to protract the war, nor followed up a victory when he had won, it was due to his own errors that he failed, and not your strategy.
"The Persians, on the contrary, though on all occasions they were well and wisely equipped, had to submit to my valour. And since it becomes a virtuous man and a king to pride himself not merely on his exploits but also on the justice of those exploits, it was on behalf of the Greeks that I took vengeance on the Persians, and when I made war on the Greeks it was not because I wished to injure Greece, but only to chastise those who tried to prevent me from marching through and from calling the Persians to account. You, however, while you subdued the Germans and Gauls were preparing to fight against your fatherland. What could be worse or more infamous? And since you have alluded as though insultingly to 'ten thousand Greeks,' I am aware that you Romans are yourselves descended from the Greeks, and that the greater part of Italy was colonised by Greeks; however on that fact I do not insist. But at any rate did not you Romans think it very important to have as friends and allies one insignificant tribe of those very Greeks, I mean the Aetolians, my neighbours? And later, when you had gone to war with them for whatever reason, did you not have great trouble in making them obey you? Well then, if in the old age, as one may say, of Greece, you were barely able to reduce not the whole nation but an insignificant state which was hardly heard of when Greece was in her prime, what would have happened to you if you had had to contend against the Greeks when they were in full vigour and united? You know how cowed you were when Pyrrhus crossed to invade you. And if you think the conquest of Persia such a trifle and disparage an achievement so glorious, tell me why, after a war of more than three hundred years, you Romans have never conquered a small province beyond the Tigris which is still governed by the Parthians? Shall I tell you why? It was the arrows of the Persians that checked you. Ask Antonius to give you an account of them, since he was trained for war by you. I, on the other hand, in less than ten years conquered not only Persia but India too. After that do you dare to dispute the prize with me, who from childhood have commanded armies, whose exploits have been so glorious that the memory of them - though they have not been worthily recounted by historians - will nevertheless live for ever, like those of the Invincible Hero, my king, whose follower I was, on whom I modelled myself? Achilles my ancestor I strove to rival, but Heracles I ever admired and followed, so far as a mere man may follow in the footsteps of a god.
It's less a test between the two commanders and more the composition of thier forces. Manipular legions were more flexible and better trained than Greek phalanx infantry. Both commanders had thier merits and thier flaws.
As for Alexander's marching speed, Ceasar was just as notorious for his ability to arrive far faster than his enemies intended, contributing greatly to his success, much like Alex. He was also older and more shrewd and was known to be able to multi task to an absurd degree. Ceasar accomplished feats just as astounding as Alex. For good comparisons of the two, I would recommend the Great Courses series on Alexander and Death Throes of the Republic by Dan Carlin. Both give very in depth analysis of the generals and the Great Courses goes into great details on Alex's forces and lesser known exploits.
I am disapointed, too many editing and cutting. If he continue i will quit watching campaing. I am not came here not to see
hi I am from norway
Håkon Nordgård hi I am from uk
Hi I am from my mom
@@Spankykiller1989 Nice
Where is the new video Jackie????
persian horde is coming
I would love to see people like this and Pixilated Apollo gain more publicity%. This group of RUclips is so amazing!!
Great video! I feel you are a bit sacrificing your cavalry a bit too easily, whether by autoresolving or by leaving your cavalry charge head on spearmen. I would like to see them a bit veteran but I fear we won't
Where's the next video
Look, I hate being one of those guys, but it's pronounced Dee-vee-day
I feel like jackiefish uses the term Hammer and Anvil way too liberally 😂
I think it is much better if u do the battle first, commentate later. So we can see a lot of cinematics & interesting focal points or highlights during the replay.
And I prefer the more cuts that you did I found it more interesting
Ready for the head to head let's go!!!
Smash the like guys all of you
Smash that like button!
Why fight off camera?
So damn good
So damn good
So damn good
Give me more😂
yesssssss
Hey Jackie fish great vid 😁😁 huge fan!
:)
Jackie Fish 😮 hi 🤣
"DIVIDE ET IMPERA" IS A LATIN PHRASE FFS ! Please pronounce it the way it should be pronounced!
Schnagobert Schnack u wot m8
_I believe most people don’t actually know how to pronounce Latin correctly. Hell, I only know because my younger brother is learning it and uses the correct pronunciations._
Monado {The One} Unovan warrior yeah exactly, so why is he criticising like that lol.
My grandmother knows Latin, but then she's a linguist right. She knows a good 7 languages; English, Welsh, Spanish, French, Italian, Latin and Anglo motherfucking Saxon. Apart from her, I don't know anyone else who speaks Latin.
So uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....pls no mo criticism schnagobert thanks
We don't know how ancient Romans would have pronounced "Divide et impera". All we know ist how to say it in medieval/catholic latin. So unless you've got reliable sources in ancient pronounciation, please don't ask hin to change his pronounciation.