What If Every State In America Had Natural Borders? | American Politics
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- The state borders of the United States are arbitrary, and need to be redrawn. Monsieur Z redraws the borders of the U.S states by accounting for culture, geography, history, economics, religion, politics, and more. Monsieur Z has spoken before about the politics behind why the American state borders should be redrawn, and now maps out what a redrawn America could look like in what the community has called the Balkanization Proclamation.
🕓New videos every weekend.
🪶Support Us On Patreon: / membership
🎖️Become A Channel Member:
/ @monsieurdean
👕 Merchandise: us-of-z-shop.c...
📘 Our Flags: / 100086678611994
✴️ Fan Reddit: / mrz_official
#history #politics #unitedstates
Help us redesign these state's flags: discord.gg/xGXzsQSF
What if the italian goverment start turning people to bread
doesnt work
Can you fix your pronunciation of Toledo, there’s two correct pronunciations (Tull-ee-doh and Toh-lay-doh) and yet you pronounced it as Tull-ett-oh
Do you have this map with major cities on it?
I would've named the state of Philadelphia after Chesapeake Bay, to avoid confusion between the state and city.
Probably a wise choice.
@@MonsieurDean Plus it avoids the need to change the name of the city to something like "Philadelphia City" which would both increase the length of the name, and cause a bit of trouble when people have to go through and rename everything with Philadelphia on it.
Delaware Valley
That's what the Philadelphia metro is called IRL
@@Wewwersthat's a good idea for a name
@@GavinKoerber It was actually the original name we gave it in the draft proposal before Z made the decision to change it to Philadelphia.
Still not sure why.
send this video to congress
Notify your state representative? 🤔
Congress would probably unfortunately have a hard time passing a bill to radically change the country like this but the people in the government need to know who they are in control over because in some cases they seem like they don’t so sending this to them as an educational thing to learn the demographics of the country would probably change something. Politicians should probably have to pass some sort of test before they get in the office because I wouldn’t be surprised if they couldn’t point to Wyoming on a map
@@exiteiscool This exactly. Hell, even voters should be required to be able to point to any state and name its capital. Voters need to be educated, lest they elect the wrong people to represent them.
@@RandomYT05_01 opening a can of worms there. Who's gonna decide what constitutes educated enough?
Its retarded
Making state capitals for all of them is going to be hard and fun
We already did that!
With regard to Huron, I would offer up Manistee as it's capital. We are a growing economy, growing population, and if this were an independent region, much of our manufacturing would return, albiet we do have a solid manufacturing and mining economy
With regard to Huron, I would offer up Manistee as it's capital. We are a growing economy, growing population, and if this were an independent region, much of our manufacturing would return, albiet we do have a solid manufacturing and mining economy
@@Izy5981No offense but according to the census your city has a population of 6 thousand. Way too small to even be considered a capital, especially in relation to other big cities close by.
harrison would be incredibly heated. columbus and indianapolis, two current capitals and both are about the same size. i think it would be dayton tho
As someone who despises the square borders of the current states, this is a PITCH PERFECT alternative.
Agreed. The new borders are peak aesthetic!
Why ? those stright lines are just there so Americans could identify their states other wise their screwed
The only problem I have with the map is how the black-majority state is split in two, and no bridge in between, That's GOTTA be racist
Texas is too broken up 😤
@@Texan_christian1132 pfp checks out
I could see American politics diversifying with such an arrangement, as now many independent individual issues are far more apparent, I could envision four mainstream parties (Right-wing, centre-right, libertarian and center-left) with some other minority parties winning the seats of their respective states (Mormons in Utah or Afro-Americans in Mississippi for example)
Texas is too broken up 😤
God forget we get some left but not those hippy radicals
@@Texan_christian1132I know my fellow Texan
@@Martin_Boru_The_Heraldwhat does texas even have going on🤷🏽♂️
@@JaKingScomezy'know that one scene from the matrix?
Do a sequel where you explain which political parties would dominate these states (and federally)
I show that toward the end.
@@MonsieurDean more like the electoral college and house (like how many electoral votes and house reps each state would have, and which party would dominate them)
@@MonsieurDeanIdaho should have been sort of square shaped, western border cascades, southern the owyhee desert, eastern rocky mountains, northern selkirk mountains, besides the whole thing is a cool idea
Hopefully a bunch of new parties to match the more plausible verity.
Even if not presidency wise, senate & congress wise.
@MonsieurDean yeah you should make more videos about this map
Homie used spears to represent the blacks😭
Please provide a timestamp
@@MoritzAxmann17:47
@@MoritzAxmann just watch the video lmao
Should have done a trailer for whites for balance
@@MoritzAxmann18:10
Happy to be a part of this! Was a fun exercise and deep dive into the overlooked peoples and cultures of every state.
Hi Dylan
@@teppizini Ayyy.
As a corporate income tax account for a national company, having 80 states with all different tax returns gives me nightmares.
Why is that diffrent than what we have now?
@@Frazier16
30 extra papers to file? And that's the smallest estimate.
On the bright side, you can demand additional pay
We can’t assume that all 80 of them would have a state income tax. Some of the new alt-states come from real life states that don’t have a state income tax
@Wendeta-hq2cp international companies deal with far far more, 30 extra states with minor differences is no biggie for a compos.
This was pretty neat. Looking forward to Part 2. I'd be interested in seeing a deeper dive/analysis of this (eg: a chart showing each state's Economy, Religion and Ethnic breakdown, projected population, and potential Capital/seat of power)
Alternately (and speaking as a Canadian) a similar breakdown for Canada could be interesting, if of more a relatively niche interest.
That would be very interesting
@@Aiden-wg4pu I second that.
It could also include canada and northern mexico being annexed into the us as some of those regions have natural regions within themselves
I find it soothing that the Florida panhandle expands north and such, reminds me of the foregone independent nation of The Republic of West Florida, a sovereign nation illegally annexed and occupied by the US after Spain's selling of Florida, that also flew a brighter color of the Bonnie Blue Flag, which is where the CSA got it from
What if the great Greek plan( Catherine the Great's of Russia's plan to restore the Byzantine Empire )succeeded
I had lots of fun contributing to this project, I hope as a community we should keep doing things like this. K. KOLVE
Political consequences of this map as a separate vid?
Sure!
@@MonsieurDean W
@@MonsieurDean
Awesome!
there are none
RIP to Four Corners, USA. You will be missed.
should have become its own state
That is a terrible thing for my area
It would become a "historical landmark". People will still go and see it and spend their money their.
“There is another” around Baton Rouge.
Using spears to represent African Americans is wild lol might as well put up a picture of a drumstick
Exactly 😭
I honestly can't believe you used spears as the symbol for the african-americans 💀
Sind Ketten besser?
@@janahabermann1418 he could have easily used a black map of Africa/er hätte problemlos eine schwarze Karte von Afrika verwenden können
@@janahabermann1418 HAHAHHAAH Ja absolut, ich stimme dir zu 🤔🤣
Found that odd too 😒
Yeah at least they should have done a spear and shield symbol.
Like on Kenya’s flag, not just spears by themselves, that’s just wrong.
As a Kentuckian, gaining Cincinnati at the cost of Appalachia is an absolute win.
Yep for Appalachia to lose y'all was definitely a win for them
As a fellow Kentuckian, I agree.
Our state also doesn't look that much different, and is kinda recognizable through the chaos that is the other states.
@@williammoran4898Appalachia losing us makes their economy tank haha
@@Johia_Mapping_2 sad that's your measure. Fr
As an Ohioan, you can have Cincinnati.
I would be curious to see a more detailed map of these new states.
Same! I am having trouble telling from the video which state I would be in, as I live near a border in this new map.
At first I hated the idea of it, but after watching it you really convinced me, Especially with the smaller rural states I thought to be redundant. Although I think you need to include to mention major cities in the borders( and points on the map), such as in Carolina and tidewater where the city location is unclear when the the real life borders are removed. I still feel like the state of new michigan and new Ohio could be cut in half and given to surrounding states, they only act as border states to areas that are already similar.
Yeah, trying to piece together where these borders run is fairly hard. Usually a jagged line indicates a coast, river, mountain ridge, or some other major geographical feature, but alot of these appear to be jagged just for the sake of not making them straight. I'd love to see some explanations for why the borders are shaped the way they are.
How would this affect the elections?
Well the senate is definitely going to see greater domination by republicans (assuming the party system isn't changed by this) given that there are now more Republican states, but the Democrats would overwhelmingly hold the House of Representatives given their states are now more consolidated around their values, and still have those large populations. In the presidential election, you're going to see fairer outcomes, as electoral votes will be more fairly distributed to various differing populations, instead of having them locked up in states that always go blue or red despite only 51% of the population voting that way. States will have fewer electoral votes individually, but those votes will (in most cases) have supermajority support behind them, a state will vote for the candidate a vast majority of the population actually supports.
@@MonsieurDean do an alternate scenario what if Austria Hungary was populated by elves and orcs
@@simonunella6330yesh
@@simonunella6330 Austrian Elves and Hungarian Orcs? or did I get it backwards?
Aelveria-Orcary
Why is the symbol for African Americans two spears?😂
Those borders are one of the most beautiful thing I have ever seen...as an european I approve this
It's horrible.
@@ssg9offical It cant get any worse than straight borders and rectangles.
There is a reason why the colonial borders in Africa and the Middle East are horrible, and the same reason applies to the US borders too.
You call yourself European? If you guy were in charge it would be all squares, thus leading to decades of wars.
@@TheZett Speaking for NA: We apologize to Europe and its borders. We're sorry we haven't had thousands of wars and political marriages to define our borders. Our bad, we'll go work on that.
Europeans love straight lined borders though. Thats their "gift" to the world
overlaying all these new states over the old ones would be sorta fun to see how they all changed
Making "Pennsylvania" the region without cities is the most Pennsylvania thing I can think of. Philly is Philly, Susquehanna has York, Harrisburg, Hershey, & Lancaster, & Allagenia is Pitt; But Pennsylvania proper "Best I can do is William's Port & State College."
Scranton. You get an even worse capital.
State College is the obvious capital, the beauty and intelligence there! WE ARE...
Im scared. As an Ohioan, I feel physically and mentally scared of you.
Good.
It's somewhat difficult to tell for sure but it looks like you've placed my city Raleigh in Virginia but it's at the borders of Tidewater and Carolina. There's a few problems with this. The NC piedmont crescent has been split with the Charlotte, Triad and Triangle in different states. For an area with such a common history, tied economy and shared infrastructure this would never work. A better alternative would be the state of Piedmont based on that geographical region. Tidewater can have everything east of the fall line while the mountains can have their own.
Great clarification! Thanks, pal.
Also, it looks like Hampton Roads has been split between Virginia and Tidewater. Splitting Newport News and Hampton from Southside makes no sense socially, politically, or economically because there is a significant amount of manufacturing in Hampton Roads that all flows together, often related to the military. If it was me I would put the entire Urban Crescent (Hampton Roads, Richmond, and DC metro areas) in Columbia and let that also include the DC/Hampton Roads exurbs. Alternately that rural interior inside the Urban Crescent could be combined with the exurban part of the Eastern Shore (the non-delaware parts basically) for an agricultural/fishing state though that while culturally coherent isn't very sensical geographically since there would be no land connection to the Eastern Shore without going through another state (or any connection at all unless you made a ferry link between like, Salisbury and somewhere like Tappahannock)
He was wrong about eastern NC anyways.
I don’t see a need to separate Carolina and tide water from each that should just be one state.
How would this version of America work politically and would the economy be damaged?
It would literally work the same, but with new state borders. Each state's government would be more representative of its population.
It wont.
Economically, US state borders are very soft. Moving state lines has relatively little effect on the economy. While any broad change of this nature would cause chaos, I don't think redrawn state borders and more senators would fundamentally alter how US politics work.
But also, the Southeast is the region with the largest increase in state count, while the north east kept a similar count. It's easy to imagine this difference would dramatically alter the political maneuvering that occured before the civil war. My best guess is that it would be delayed a little longer, but still occur and still end more or less the same way.
This was such a fun project, and I’m happy to have been a part of it! Part one was great, can’t wait for part two!!
Would love to read a book based on this new United States
Imagine if there were new state flags as well :)
@@AlexTonar That comes next.
@@MonsieurDean no way 😂🥹
its basically turning the USA into its own, bigger version of Europe, always said something like this would help fix a lot of the issues in the states relating to economy and trust. Local representation and smaller nations, or in the case states, tends to work well and this would give people much more say in how their areas are run and hopefully diversify the political climate whilst promoting all sides to work together more then they currently do.
As a belligerent texan i have to stand agaist breaking uo texas on principle but i will also admit that practically it makes sense
Texas is too broken up 😤
I’m so happy with how this came out, truly beautiful
@@beasley1232I live in Chicago, and while I acknowledge it's problems, those areas along the Great Lake would benefit from similar policy, or at the very least not being a part of the other states they would be in, which would create divergent interests. The whole point of the map is to create naturally convergent interests in the states.
Why dont you acknowledge the differences between different black groups. You call them all African. But the European groups you acknowledge the differences and label them as finish and german and so on. Black Americans have had a ethno Genesis amd are not African genetically yes. But we should ne respected and seen as a separate group. Just as are the many different white groups are. Just saying. Maybe it doesn't seem like a big deal but to me it makes a huge difference. Especially for a scenario like this.
My beautiful Texas,what have you done with her
Texas is too broken up 😤
My question would be, how would these new borders affect our Legislative and Executive Branches of government?
fr
There would be 60 more senators and about the same amount of representatives. There would be little more skewing of representation in the Senate by land area and significantly less skewing in the house on population levels.
On the executive branch, there would probably be less election pandering to the high population states since the population averages of each state are a lot closer. Since there would be a likelyhood of multiple parties rather than just the two, the making of the executive branch being non party held and elected to independent stances could stand a chance of being a reality.
@@OverstuffedDragonhow would the house at all be affected since it’s based on population alone and the population stays the same
@@jesuslover4436 As it is, the population assignment for each representative is not even from state to state. California has 53 total with each one representing about 740k people while montana has 1 that represents 1.1 million people. If the country is divided by 80 states with more equal population levels then alloting 1 representative at California's current 740k per would mean more representatives overall in the house while going with Montana's rate you'd have less.
@@OverstuffedDragon oh gotcha I wasn’t thinking thank you!
If you enjoy our content, please consider supporting us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/monsieurz/membership
And, if you have any questions or additions to make to your state, let us know in the comments!
keep it up dude!👍
What if Switzerland was made of cheese?
Loved this video!
@@Louis14022 Will do, pal!
@@Wendeta-hq2cp Napoleon never would have conquered it, nor the moon.
From a Hoosier in the coal belt region. All the “English” are Scots and Irish. A surprisingly large population of 3rd and 4th generation Scots.
As a native of south eastern ohio most of the "English" are Scotch Irish, most of the "Germans" are English, and most of the "Native Americans" are Elizabeth Warren.
@@Liethen As an English guy, you're all pretty much American dudes!:)
@@silliestsususagest3276 Are they American dudes? are they? Do they hold to the sacred truths of Guns, God, and Tax Evasion? Let this be your litmus test.
Imagine the absolute chaos that would be the federal government, particularly congress (not that it currently does anything of use for the people anyways). The two party system would immediately collapse as regional political parties would become much more in tune to serve the needs of its constituents.
Also, it’d be cool to see this same type of analysis with bigger regions as nation states that have enough in common to be willing to enter into a mini federal union (which honestly I believe is much more likely). Nice vid though.
With no changes to the system, two party system will inevitably emerge again
@@andrejs4984: Yeah, in order to get more than two parties, you need proportional representation.
@@danielbishop1863not entirely necessary: see the UK which has a first past the post system, but its culturally distinct regions often have their own parties
I think chaos and division is the objective. Clearly such a country could not longer be called The United States of America. A better name might be the fractured States of America or perhaps, surprise surprise, The Confederate States of America
In other words do away with our country. Our greatest enemy countries agree with that sentiment
I can see influences from your book, Mr. Z, dont think you can hide them from me.
It would also be interesting to see how this layout would function both in our current political system, and how it would function in a hypothetical American Parliamentary system like was explored in previous episodes.
Keep in mind most of these borders were decided upon by conclusions from the community. The similarities to the borders I lay out in my book are because they largely reflected actual regional cultures.
@@MonsieurDean you accidentally replied twice
WHAT IF MARYLAND WAS MADE OUT OF CRABS?!!!!
What would be the capitals and populations of all these new states?
We'll have all those details ready for part two!
Would be interested to hear how your group decided to draw lines weighted by cultural groups, vs watershed boundaries, vs rivers etc. Here in the NC Piedmont as in the Appalachians, I would tend to draw lines along drainage divides (watersheds) so that the folks in each administrative group shared a common watershed at least (perhaps you have done this to some degree). Also, I might suggest you pay more tribute to the original inhabitants of the land and their ancestors in determining boundaries and naming “states.” I might prefer to live in “Occaneechia” (or some such) rather than “Virginia”, which refers to an overseas queen.
That reminds me about my own area. Philadelphia before it was such was once inhabited by many Lenni Lenape people, right? Maybe our new state name should use their tribe name.
This would solve lots of problems
The future is in balkanization
I imagine this might shake some things up, if it were to occur (which it won’t, sadly)… I cannot imagine a system of states arranged as such functioning in our current system of government. In a parliamentary system, this would most certainly be ideal
Also patriotic people that like their current state would definitely not agree with this like how they gave marylands main city's to DC which is socially differnt to us on the coast also I'm pretty sure we are differnt politically also
How would it be more ideal in a parliamentary system?
@@lukeporras1288 It depends on how it is set up, but usually in that type of system the parliament's seats are filled based on a national vote and divvied out in proportion to percentages of political party votes received. So theoretically the vote values of urban areas wouldn't be diminished in favor of low population rural areas like they are now. Regional politics would stay regional, and have less bearing on national politics.
If we change to this map and kept our current federal system with no adjustments, then the government would turn extremely conservative where 20-30% of the population determined the composition of the government at the expense of the 70-80%. Right now it is about 40% deciding for about 60%. When the US constitution was ratified the bulk of the population was rural; even the biggest cities were under 100k, so balancing out small pop states and large pop states made sense. However, with the large waves of urbanization in the late 19th century and throughout the 20th century, no adjustments were made to correct for this demographic discrepancy politically so things have become more skewed and imbalanced and time goes on. The overwhelming majority of Americans live in urbanized areas, but low pop rural areas often call the shots politically, particularly in the Senate. For example, there are way more people in a few counties in the NYC area, than there are in a number of states combined; and yet rural folks in those states have around 12 Senators representing them with the folks in NYC have arguably less than 2, since they have to share them with the rest of New York state.
"Honey wake up, a new Monsieur Z just dropped"
80 states... How is anything going to be done in the senate with 29 "new" states? Not to mention the removal of previous seats/chairs long held in tradition?
You could reduce the number of senators to 1 per state, or you could make it so removed each state gets one vote. I don't mind more gridlock though.
Suggestion: What if Blessed karl was successful on the Sixtus affair?
The Americanization of the Balkans! :) (square boarders that WON'T cause a 2nd Balkan War! :))
You make a good point.@@beasley1232
My poor Coloradan square 😭😭
It had to go.
This would be awesome as an interactive MapCharts map.
Very cool. I’d love to see the same done for Canada
We'd have large swaths of deadland then.
@@Wendeta-hq2cp don't we already?
@@BurnedByTheFurnace3
I mean in terms of new borders.
You'd have a few small states and then one big state that has literally no population. Or perhaps have pockets of deadland in between population centers, I'm not quite sure which.
@@Wendeta-hq2cp well the division wouldn't be identical, as we'd still have the northern territories. Alberta would likely remain the same ,but I could see Ontario being split demographically into 3 separate provinces, with the space between Albert and Ontario being divided between the north and south
@@BurnedByTheFurnace3
Interesting.
Could you show a map with the old borders and new borders overlapped?
I would be in the Erie state, and it would be pretty OP having Detroit, Buffalo, Toledo, and Cleveland.
I would like to say that Frankilin, while definitely still Baptist majority, it would be a slim one. Other, non Christian faiths are growing more common and accepted, and multiple Baptist churches are very distinct from one another. The Evangelicals wouldnt like the Snake Handlers, for example.
I love the representation of my home region and just wish to offernsome constructive criticism, i really love this video ❤
It's much appreciated!
As someone (Hoosier) that took part in this project, and an important part of the Midwest Community, this is a great video and I am glad you made this. I have one complaint, the way you said “Hoosier” is incorrect. The way that it is supposed to be pronounced is (Who? Sure) No hate though, it is kind of hard to pronounce.
I am having trouble telling where the northern border of Hoosier/southern border of Harrison goes through Indiana; maybe you could help me figure out which state I would be in?
@@stacyroth1664well, I’m in the north, but I might be able to help. I looks like Harrison and Hoosier connect near the border of the Wabash River
Thank you!
As a native Hoosier, but not a native of the State of Hoosier, I am curious about the border of my native land and Hoosier-land. I have spent my adult life residing in Scandamerica, and I am forever having to explain to the uninitiated that an invisible if distinct line divides Indiana between the Cultural Midwest and the Cultural South. My rule of thumb (subject to debate, natch) is that one can draw a line from where the Great Miami River enters the Ohio towards the northeastern corner of Monroe County, and then from the northwestern corner of that same county (and den of iniquity, but I digress) draw a line over to Sullivan and Knox county lines on the Wabash. One side is the Midwest, the other side is the South, and the distance between Indianapolis and Louisville is vastly larger than 115 miles would suggest.
@@BuzzThroughwith I do agree with you, I’d say its more of a population thing. Where you are talking about it more so divides the larger population of the great lakes to the more rural south. (Of course theres exceptions) but yes! I definitely agree with you
I think the Greater NYC area extends too far into Western Connecticut and what is more so under the influence of Boston and the shared Southern New England identity. Of anything, the Greater NYC area should only really encompass Fairfield County.
If you wanted to push it, I could see the state line for Greater NYC Area being as far as New Haven and Waterbury, though I think you lose a fair amount of NYC influence by that point and start pushing into proper New England culture and identity, so at most it may be best to have the state line for NYC Area and Massachusetts be somewhere in between Fairfield County and the aforementioned cities. This aside, the Northeast looks pretty good honestly. 🤩
if possible, could you at the end overlay the old American states over the new states. I think I would find that interesting to look at see all the splits.
Yeah good idea
Pause at 0:04
I like the fact that all of the great lakes (except ontario for obvious reasons) have states named after them.
but ontario the state would be really funny, like imagine an american and canadian arguing over whether ontario is better than ontario?
Given the map, that would probably be Seneca that would be the state of Ontario? Considering that Ontario Canada is bigger than Texas it would be a quite lopsided rivalry
As a Minnesotan it weird to image on Minneapolis and St. Paul being in different states with the division along the Mississippi. Also, as both cities straddle the river, each would lose significant portions of their area to the other state. Looking forward to part two!
They're in the same state, I do believe.
@@MonsieurDean Did the border there veer off of the Mississippi onto the Minnesota River for a bit? The border edge between Superior and whatever the state to the west will be looked enough like the route of the Mississippi up to Lake Itasca that I just assumed. Map not detailed enough to tell I guess, and I'm probably getting too in the weeds with the details. Anyway, fun stuff to consider.
Yeah, for certain metro areas based around rivers we typically crossed over the river just a bit, if the land across the river was similar enough.
@@MonsieurDean Makes sense. Thanks for clarification. Good info to consider when looking at some of the other states on the map.
@@MonsieurDeanthat feels *wrong* there are a lot of border straddling cities that exist intentionally to straddle the border.
Oh well, Balkanizing isn't supposed to make political sense.
Hey man, I've recently left being a part of a more "Leftist" channel (i.e. Anark) and my flirtations with Marxism when I was younger. I recognise the need for a robust immigration system that will not tolerate illegality, a strong military & state, as well as a proud people & nation.
So, as I was subbed to you before turning anarchist and marxist, I've decided to resubscribe as of today!
Welcome back, pal!
@@MonsieurDean 🫡
Happens to the best of us, glad to see you’ve reconsidered!
@@HunterGalvius ✊🏼
Susquehanna nationalism 🐎🐎🌊🌊✝️✝️
For part two, would be really helpful to see population and GDP estimates for each state
Putting up GDP estimates would severely undermine the political project motivating this video. All of these rural conservative states would be third world hellholes without productive urban centers to support them.
Northwestern Connecticut is quite rural and conservative; it has more in common with the state of Albany than it does NYC or even Long Island.
19:30 the nations of the East: New England, New Ireland, New Italy, New Hibernia, *New Germany*, New Ulster, New Britian, New Africa, New Königsburg, New Cuba.
Makes me think, what if there was an aditonal administrative level between state and federal, like I believe Poland has. With smaller states like this it would be more interesting than irl.
I would argue the "Mid south" could be its own state. Encompassing Memphis all the way to the current Georgia border. With its northern border being up to savannah TN
I didnt realise my wee country had such an impact in america! Go ulster!
You know, I know I don't agree with some of your politics, but this is an amazing video. This would do so many great things for politisphere as well.
Well I'm glad you enjoyed it, pal.
@@MonsieurDean Do people write fan fic based on your content? I would love to see what people think could cause this "Balkanization Proclamation" to occur. Maybe some figures that would show up, the conflicts that arise as a result. I know your videos are more of the big picture, instead of this typed of personal anecdotal stories within the big picture.
@@GMSquaredyou can make one!
@@AlexTonar Well, I guess what I would do is make the last few years about 3% worse in terms of the pandemic, economic, and political missteps. I'd have the the overall state of global issues be about 3% worse.
In this fanfiction, I'd provide just enough plausibility within the text to show that division is reaching a boiling point by now, seeing a scenario that by 2035, the states were being pushed so heavily in separate directions, that when a vote was put to make DC and Puerto Rico states, that a new insurrection occurred that was quelled, but it was coordinated, and instead of just one political affiliation, there was insurrectionists that also ended up fighting counter insurrectionist vigilantes, which drove home how divided things were and made for a much more broad re-defining of the map. For which was the only way that bipartisan approaches were made.
If I were to go through with this, I'd probably make it from the perspective of simple officer within an non-profit charity that just wanted to help the poor, became disillusioned from all political parties and just didn't trust anybody. They'd probably live in a metropolitan area, they would deal with the negatives from both sides prior to Balkanization Proclamation, and then experience the effect of the proclamation passing and how the community started to rally around them to be a secretary of the new State's Governor.
This would immediately cause ethnic violence
I find this quite interesting and fascinating due to the fact that in an alternate universe I could see these states becoming reality because of the instability and chaos which made up 2019 & 2020
It was so fun to be a part of this project! Love ya Mr Z
Great map! However one error I need to point out is the people of Westsylvania (especially the Eastern Kentucky region) are more ethnically English than Scots-Irish. In the 1980’s, the eastern counties of Kentucky was the only region where more than half of its population is of reported English ancestry. My grandparents for example were from Eastern Kentucky and while we do have some Scots-Irish roots, much, if not most of our ancestry can be traced back to England.
umm that's interesting, but also English ancestry is by far the most undercounted ethnicity as well it's the oldest one. So say if someone has mostly English Ancestry dating from the thirteen colonies and then some more recent ancestry say from Germany, they're far more likely to call themselves German-American. :) But yeah this sort of thing should have an "American" option because at least culturally American who describe themselves as German American or Anglo-American or Irish-American are pretty much no different, they're for the most part all just American.
@@silliestsususagest3276 One can argue that White/European-Americans (at least those of us who are of Colonial Stock) are already a distinct ethnic group of our own due to centuries of intermarriage, assimilation, and developing our own distinct history, culture, and identity.
@@kcirtapelyk6060 oh yeah I would agree! I believe there should definitely be an "American" option rather then sorted all European Americans into groups such as Irish, German, or English etc. As well for a lot of American the ancestry are far remove (like a grandparent), and well I'm not sure that makes you really that nationality/Ethnicity. For Instance I'm 1/4 Polish I would never dream of calling myself Polish-, as well I don't speak Polish, I haven't been to Poland, I don't know Polish culture, what exactly is Polish about me? if you kinda' get what I'm getting at?!
Who cares you’re all the same
@@bigboy3686 That’s as ignorant as saying Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans are all the same because they all have slanted eyes and black hair.
Isnt 80 too big of a number for a first level subdivisions? I personally think even 50 is to much to be practicall even in the case of such giant country.
Your content is unique and I have always enjoyed your videos. Keep doing a great job, I hope to see you take office one day
Thank you very much!
Horrific, terrible, disgusting, i love it
Balkans: "Who are you????"
This alternate usa: "i'm you but bigger"
Very Interesting map, and for the most part quite plausible. Still, I wonder...is there anyway to get this map enlarged with specific cities, rivers, etc. As a native of the State of Harrison (so far as I can surmise) who has to work and, thus reside in Scandamerica (though I do most of my shopping across the river in Superior), I am curious to know where I am located and where I was located.
Well, I guess nothing has changed for me in name. I am a current Pennsylvanian still living in Pennsylvania, even after the border shift. However, since Harrisburg appears to be in the state of Susquehanna, I wonder what our new state capital would be? My guess would be Scranton or perhaps Binghamton?
The capital is in fact Scranton.
@@MonsieurDean Do you know which state Mercer Co. Pennsylvania is in, given this map?
@@MonsieurDeanWell, if you wanted a worse city than Harrisburg, you found it in Scranton. I hope Harrisburg is not the capital of Susquehanna. Give Harrisburg to Philadelphia. No one in Susquehanna wants it. The capital should be Hershey.
I would vote for Mansfield.
Great I thought I would escape milwaukees influence, I just got Chicago added. FFS
What do the different colours represent? Are they supposed to be like official 'Greater States' or something?
And also, isn't the whole point of America's capital (Washington D.C.) supposed to be that it isn't in any state?
The American culture in these areas
Running this whole thing sounds like a nightmare, way too many entities, and ig would be much easier for them to break apart if they feel neglected, especially considering how they're all closely tied to a particular culture
Gerrymandering at it's finest
The city of Albany, New York is pronounced as ALL-ban-NEE not as AL-banee. I live in New York State and went to university and graduate school in Albany.
I cannot describe how happy I am I was part of this
As a Wisconsinite I hate naming the state that includes majority Wisconsin territory “Chicago”. I think Michigan would actually be a more apt name for it because the Michigan you have in you video barely borders Lake Michigan and doesn’t contain the major citys along the lake. I think any state named after its largest city is just lazy. Like why was Madison not just the new wisconsin? Like I understand that without the northern part of the state and Milwaukee/Green Bay a lot of Wisconsin’s culture is divided into different areas but getting rid of the state completely doesn’t sit right with me
As someone from Upstate New York (Saint Lawrence Country) I see this as win
There's no way this works... All these cities would starve.
I'm ready to live in New Germany. Let's make it happen.
Guten Tag 🇩🇪
this isn't good enough. we need to split down to local county, city, and district states, and we could have federations like the Hanseatic League. I live in north western washington, and I don't want the larger population centers of Everett, Bellingham, and especially Seattle having anything to do with the decision making of my local communities. and in general there should not be states of a larger territorial area, if states as institutions are going to exist they should be city states, district states, and MAYBE county states
and if you don't abolish the remnants of the general government that became the DC beast regime, you will solve exactly *nothing* in terms of societal strife and domestic political issues
By far my most favorite video on this channel.
I am mixed on this, it makes sense and would be better. However, the traditional part of me does not like this. Also people struggle to remember 50 states. Imagine 76 states.
STATE OF ERIE REPRESENT
using spears as the symbols for majority african american states is CRAZY 😭
This was very entertaining. Id live in New alabama it seems. As a Scotch-Irish Baptist I approve
I'd agree though in my opinion Tennessee should be included in Alabama as both cover the Cumberland plateau area in this map. The people and life styles are very in tune. Now I appreciate you splitting it north and south as I've always thought Alabama was more northern focused largest amount of population while Mississippi was more southern and delta focused. Basically give the south Alabama to Mississippi tak north Mississippi to Alabama and the center of Tennessee from the Ohio River to the Mississippi from the Smoky mountains to the Piedmont fall line. The actually foot hills of Appalachia
I think you should've accounted for financial independence for each of these new states. I'm certain that some of these states would not be able to support the current level of public sector spending and should be merged with states that have a fiscal surplus. The way you have it basically separates poor rural areas from the rich urban centers, accelerating wealth and development gaps.
My only criticism is that redrawing states should have more consideration and context for current political trends. For example I am from the eastern most county in Long Island and i’ll say this. The further away from NYC you are the more distinct the politics, economy and culture is. Furthermore since COVID and the poor administration leading to NYC decline in dominance. I think there could be a viable Long Island State if New York as we know it was dismembered. Perhaps the more urban boroughs of Queens and Brooklyn have a special autonomy or perhaps Nassau and Suffolk go at it alone and try to unite the island later. But especially my county Suffolk is significantly more conservative than the rest of the “new” New York.
Also I’d name the new New York “Emporia” as a sort of word play regarding “The Empire State”.
I see what you're doing here, but honestly, I think we need fewer rather than more states. Adding states means adding more state governments, regulations and likely higher taxes for the residents. If you took the smaller states that you shaded in the same color and made those combination regions into states, I could get behind that. It would be more fiscally responsible as well.
Love your content man! Keep up the good work 😊😊😊❤❤❤
Will do!
@@MonsieurDean awesome
If this happened the usa should use the 13 star flag because over 80 stars would look ridiculous