Bach: Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 / Karajan · Berliner Philharmoniker
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июн 2015
- Full-length concert: www.digitalconcerthall.com/co...
Johann Sebastian Bach: 1st movt. from Brandenburg Concertro No. 3 / Herbert von Karajan, conductor · Berliner Philharmoniker / Recorded at the Salle Pleyel, Paris, 1968
The Berliner Philharmoniker's Digital Concert Hall:
www.digitalconcerthall.com
Subscribe to our newsletter:
www.digitalconcerthall.com/ne...
Website of the Berliner Philharmoniker:
www.berliner-philharmoniker.de 
Видеоклипы
It is very rare to see Karajan at the Pleyel harpsichord....
That’s the maestro!!! He plays it without any single music sheets to refer!!! Awesome awesome!!!
Unfortunately one can hardly hear the harpsichord in this recording most of the time.
😅
My idol when I was a teenager, and stil now the Pole star when I jump on the podium and conduct.
Written in 1721.
Listening in 2023.
How did this guy write better music 300 years ago ?
Magnifique Karajan Bach Love Music ❤️
Genial Karajan.
this made me happy as i recalled bach and music and my childhood
Tolles der unsterbliche Karajan , Bach ist gefreute darauf :)
Es un deleite escucharlos!
So incredible!!
Awesome. Karajan is very good ...
Nice.
These Bachian tonal sequences are just... AAAHHHH
Karajan=Genius
Karajan=God
My most favorite classical piece, especially the 1st movement.
abelsincain no Classic. Music Baroque
@@marcoszamora2089 baroque is still part of early classical music right?
Karajan himself on the harpsichord...
Well Karajan was faking playing it.
@@kendekoeijer4825 did he?
@@MaxiHartlieb I don't think so, Karajan was a great pianist, he studied piano before deciding to become a conductor.
Encore un fois. Merveilleux
VERY GOOD THE AUDIO.
O Karajan foi um monstro da música erudita. Podemos dizer que a a figura dele modificou o padrão de qualidade na execução das obras eruditas no século XX de tal modo que até hoje ele é tido como referência na execução de tais obras.
Um merda.
sublime!!
Più grande interpretazione di questo, come di altri concerti, non si può ascoltare.
I watched a train documentary called steam memories of Ontario and they had this song playing in the beginning and the background of the whole entire documentary
this has nothing to do with trains, steam or canada. very poor choice of music for such a film.
El genio de J.S.Bach por siempre insuperable
Alicia Vinella Y más aún con Von Karajan dirigiendo. Para mi también él insuperable.
Totalmente de acuerdo. Un saludo muy cordial !
Gracias
El barroco de Karajan (Bach, Vivaldi) envejeció peor que el resto de su música, debido a la presencia de especialistas como Pinnock, Gardiner, Koopman, etc. que han abierto nuevas perspectivas de interpretación.
Too cool!
Fröhlich in den Herbst
Von Karajan,uno de mis directores favoritos y más admirados. Qué chingon!
f*** is right cuz that s all he was.
Happiness word only for this
Ghost in the background at 1:15
+Myles Gearon it's the spirit of Bach
Myles Gearon 7
Or someone walking out through the door
really?
very skittish one :D
Obwohl er es meiner Meinung nach geschafft hat, nicht erreichbar zu sein, bleibt Herbert von Karajan der brillante Interpret, der zumindest die Perfektion berührt hat.
great
Love Brandenburg Concerto by Bach. Although so many people dislike Karajan's Bach
La mejor interpretación que he escuchado, un deleite para el alma.....
Karl Richter, Münchener Bach Orchester... escucharás una enorme diferencia. :)
@@anadunn1378 enorme para nada la versión de Karajan es muy buena, la de Ritcher es un poco mejor refinada y estilizada. Los 2 genios de la interpretacion de Bach, no puede haber interpretaciones iguales, sino no tendría sentido. En la música hay diferencias en las interpretaciones que elijen los directores para no parecerse unos a otros, hay mucha subjetividad en las opiniones de la gente en cuanto que interpretación es mejor.-
We need to appreciate these earlier attempts at the Baroque period, however difficult they may be listenable to now. They set in motion the great revival we have witnessed over the last 30 years, and what a glorious musical revolution it has been!
I think this version works well. I like to hear many different interpretations.
Glorious indeed. Having fascists spit over musical interpretations because history books said play detaché/quick/whatever
riguardo alla poca "cura" degli archi ritengo che siano le accordature a 432hz o con lievi scordature tipiche degli strumenti d'epoca,qui magari non effettivamente presenti ma certamente imitati..ottimo!
432 di quale epoca scusa?? Di Bach ne dubito fortemente dato che i diapason cambiavano in ogni città quasi...
🔥🔥🔥
Bach, a expressão do barroco.
Uno de los mas grandes directores de orquesta del mundo. No por nada fue nominado Director de por vida de la Filarmonica de Berlin. A pesar de la oposicion de los judios. Grande Herbert, dejaste un legado dificil de igualar.
No los estaras confundiendo con Furtwaengler? Tengo entendido que los judios no tenían problema con Karajan a diferencia de Furt.
@@ruperttmls7985 Karajan supported the Nazi party
Los músicos de Orquesta Filarmónica de Berlín tienen la capacidad de elegir a su propio director jefe. A la muerte de Furtwängler, los músicos de la orquesta se reunieron y eligieron a Karajan por unanimidad. Los judíos no tuvieron nada que ver en este caso.
Ich liebe Herbert lang lebe er!
This is just the first movement of the concerto.
Tak.
감동
❤❤👍🏻👍🏻👌🏻
Kaum zu glauben dass sie es so spielten. Andere Zeiten
а почему 2 клавира?
what is the tuning ? A=448hz ?
In the original video which you can find in other channel, there’s pitch of 440Hz. I think this video was edited
@@ansutan1857Karajan certainly did not tune to A=440
that harpsichord looks robust and big and modern. what kind is it? looks a modernized one
It seems like a Pleyel harpsichord, and yes, it is a "modern" (ca. 1920) version of the instrument without historical informed building references. Since 60's and 70's there's a lot of research and interest to build historical informed instruments... Very different from Pleyel and some Neupert keyboards
Is this played in a flat major than g major?
The instruments her have been tuned higher than usual; at 465 Hz. Hence the pitches sound a semitone higher.
What key do you get if you drop a piano down a mine shaft? A flat minor.
@@SuperFerdie1965 haha 😂😆
This isn't Salle Pleyel...
半世紀前のものとは思えん
おそろしいわ
EXQUISITO
This was 1968? Video looks much more recent. Are you sure it wasn't 1986?
the quality of film is much superior to the early days of digital, so this is 1968. Plus by the late 80s he was suffering from back problems and illness (i think) so no way would he hv been playing
Brilliant but a bit soft.
I have a CD from DG of the same concertos, also performed by Berliner Philharmoniker and conducted by Herbert von Karajan, but recorded in 1965. Which sounds even "lazier" than this one. Perhaps Karajan had a different impression and understanding of the Brandenburg Concertos.
Mit diese müsik können wir nur nachdenken über ihre Intelligenz :)
Alle waren Deutsch.
@@SaletAdechine que quieres decir?
@@SaletAdechine hahahaha was für ein Bullshit.
@@m.p.2234 Für dich...
Karajan eben, spielt Cemballo ud dirigiert mit einem Kopfnicken die Philharmoniker
弾き振り(弾いてるフリ)
Sadly, the high pitches can barely be heard :/
Why this sounds like in A flat? This is supposed to be g major.
Probably tuning is at A=465 which sounds a semitone higher than tuning today. 465 is an uncommon baroque tuning nowadays but it was widely used in early baroque music, although it still is interesting Karajan picked such a tuning given the concerto is not a very early pick in baroque repertoire
can't even hear the soloists
Soloists? Aren't they soli sections? That's how I've played it.
+mprz052 oh yes they are
Von Karajan went in Karl Richter domain…
Uiii, viel zu schnell…seine Version mit den Berliner Philharmonikern ist etwas langsamer und gewaltiger und gefällt mir persönlich besser. Aber es liegt wohl daran, dass ich es als Kind so gehört habe und für mich so abgespeichert habe 😂
Never knew karajan played the organ
Its a harpsichord
Hi,I’ve heard this concert many times.Well done,however listen to Karl Ritcher please.The Rent are shit
Need more zoom
10대 때 용돈생기면
성음레코드사 가서
도이체그라모폰
카라얀이라고 적힌
노란 카세트테잎을 사왔죠~~
Musicians hairstyles
Is Herbert actually playing the Harpsichord? It looks strange and unnatural, more like a playback thing.
Well, they recorded a lot with playback. And maybe he isn‘t playing in this Video. But he is able to Play anyway and the in the ‚playback‘ he is of course playing. And in my opinion the Video isn‘t ridicoulous in any thinkable way it‘s brilliant!
Leandro He is not. And the video is simply ridiculous
Of course he is playing. I saw him in concert, live, playing a piano Mozart concerto. He was pianist before becoming conductor.
Terrible audio. Whoever mic'ed this session should be sacked.
maxcohen13 I'm sorry but it was the 1960s... maybe some modern post production might be good, but it's seems on par with the sound equipment they had then
Wtf was that at 1:17
Kylie Jordan f****** ghost mam
Lens flare from the lamps off-camera.
He was Celibidache that was hungry because his rehearsal was cancelled
Do you know - I don't think Karajan is actually playing the harpsichord here. There is a sorry lack of footage of his hand movements over the keyboard, overcompensated for by his bodily movements which give the impression that he is playing. There is no single piece of clear aural evidence that he is playing.... why did he agree to do this? He is miming at the keyboard if you will.
No! This is not just a promo for Karajan and it fails for me as a profound expression of Bach. Also in using modern instruments the players do not seem to get into its ethos.
Si parla sempre degli interpreti ma non di tutta la cornice. Troppi particolari ravvicinati, troppe inquadrature sfocate e accavallate: non è così che assistiamo ai concerti, una visione così frammentata è angosciante... l'unica è ascoltare a occhi chiusi.
Dillo a François Reichenbach, regista di questa pellicola e di altri capolavori della letteratura cinematografica francese!
Soprendente qui la scarsa cura per la qualità del suono degli archi, mi sarei aspettato di meglio dai Berliner (si veda ad esempio la Badinerie, tutta un'altra cosa). Inoltre la regia non fa capir nulla.
Sospetto che il cameraman ( e anche il regista) avessero bevuto troppo. Mi è venuto il mal di mare!
Dillo a François Reichenbach, regista di questa pellicola e di altri capolavori della letteratura cinematografica francese!
@@gabrieleponziani7529 Ormai sarà morto, il danno è comunque fatto.
@@gianlucamarcialis3595 E la regia di Badinerie è la stessa
@@gabrieleponziani7529 che vuoi che ti dica, il giorno non era in vena.
easy to hear, difficult to watch.
La bande son est très mauvaise dommage!!
niezly kurwa Chopin
i didn´t understood a single thing
I seriously think you may need to clean your ears
To me it is Beautiful music
The negative comments are from people who are jealous of karajan
Schau-Spieler.....
No.
Karajan Bad
tu eres un idiota al cuadrado!!!
ברצינות, זה מה שיש לך לכתוב?
@@itamarbar9580אל תקשיב לו אורי זה קורע מצחוק
Karajan bad
Nope.
Two harpsichords, why even bother with any? Interesting but vastly inferior performance to a good historically informed performance practice on period instruments.
+PR A Excuse me Sir, am I wrong in understanding that you are claiming that there should be NO harpsichord and at the same time calling for a "historically informed" performance (whatever that means nowadays)?
I am saying why did Karajan bother with any number of harpsichords? It was pointless for his out dated large orchestra, modern performance. Baroque music should be historically informed.
The original score shows a "Continuo" part, but doesn't explain in details how it should be composed. So it could be one or two (or more !) harpsichords, with or without organ/double bass/viola da gamba/bassoon/lute etc... You may hear the St Matthew Passion conduced by René Jacobs and AKAMUS, who uses the largest continuo ensemble (7 or 8 musicians) to follow Evangelist, Vox Christi, and the rest of the choir. Bach composed this for two organs only, and usually a harpsichord or a lute when he couldn't use the 2nd organ of St.Thomas church. It's certainly not an "historically informed" performance, but it's the best one I've never heard.
@@Floridantea Outdated large orchestra... I am sorry but have you heard the minimalistic perfectionist nonsense that modern orchestras are playing with? Karajan's large orchestra worked because not only did it not sound so well... Minimalist but every part was played to the fullest and there was no true stylistic individualism within it.
@@titanicman9329 If it works for you, then go for it. Karajan's practice isn't repeated today on the Brandenburgs. I wonder why.
Isn't a great performance. There is better around the youtube today,
Nowadays we know enough for knowing that this version is horrible.
Ridiculous! It's visible that he is not playing the harpsichord. It's a fake performance.
Ma certo che sta suonando...si sono divisi le parti i due solisti
Quite awful to be honest.
I didn't like karajan's sound nor his Tempo, There is a recording by Abaddo which is much more beautiful I think.
This is horrible, but Karajan is my idol.
Excruciatingly boring. Karajan was good in the romantic and post-romantic repertoire and his unfortunately few forays into 20th century are also very good (especially his Schoenberg, Berg and Webern) but works from the classical era and especially from the baroque era with him conducting are unlistenable. Sorry.
too slow for me. bored.
No.