Man sometimes I wish I was just book smart. And I know that sound silly but sometimes my brain can’t comprehend certain things. I’ve always been rubbish at science. Anyone else think their Imaan would be sky high if they were just academically smart. I mean like their brain can comprehend some complex stuff.. would be the best feeling ever.
উনার ডিবেটগুল বাংলা সাবটাইটেল করতে হবে। বাংলাদেশে অধিকাংশ ইংরেজি বুঝে না। আমাদের কাজ হচ্ছে কিন্তু অনেক কন্টেন্ট। আপনি কি পারবেন আপনার চ্যানেল এ এনার ভিডিও বাংলা সাবটাইটেল তৈরি করতে
I met Abdulla randomly in speakers corner, it was the summer of 2003, there was a heatwave. We spoke and he helped me find my way again. I was very surprised because I was an Arab from Arabia and he was a Brit. He gave me his email but my mail never went through. Good to see him after 17 long years.
The contents are presented in a very simplistic manner that even laymen and people with only basic scientific knowledge could understand, great video Ustadh.
"Or were they created by nothing, or are they ˹their own˺ creators? Or did they create the heavens and the earth? In fact, they have no firm belief ˹in Allah˺." - Qur'an ( 52:35-36)
Alhamdulillah, I hope this would be the beginning of many fruitful and informational videos that we can learn from you Ustadh. Always waiting to see more of you. Jazakallah for your efforts.
@@kuhabazak - saying rational thinking when in fact its just a personal opinion , you can't be biased and claim your using rational thinking - using personal opinions to disprove science - working hard to disprove science because it expose your silly religion , zero credibility - hyping up your religion while putting down science because it can't give you an answer to a certain something , when in reality religion can't give you an answer either (saying a invisible sky daddy abra kadabra everything is not an answer) want more or that is enough ? "any sane person" ? rofl you believe in a god that will burn and torture people for eternity because they simply didn't believe in him even though he doesn't need our worshiping you believe that god is the most loving and merciful lol you all need to be put in a mental hospital asap so don't talk about sanity again cause you just made yourself look like a big joke
I feel like if Abdullah and Hamza Tzortzis were to form a team, they could debate anyone on the existence of God or the truth of Islam and no one will ever be able to sufficiently challenge their arguments. I would love to see that happen in the future
mashaa'Allah. I'm so interested in this topic but unfortunately I haven't found anything on RUclips on this subject which isn't by Atheists who try and put their spin on it. Keep up the good work Brother
JazakAllah Khair! Sir, for this amazing work. Even today, some Muslims tends to ignore the scientific facts thinking that science has nothing to do with our Imaan. I argue that understanding science (not vague theories like evolution) can bring us closer to Allah Azzawajal. I learned to connect science and Islam from the late Dr Israr Ahmed, I remembered his statement that science is a gift from Allah to mankind. SubhanAllah! Sir, we need people like him and you to fill in this gap. May Allah reward you! Looking forward to following up on your videos!
There is nothing called "Scientific fact" When muslims say that science has nothing to do with our Iman we mean that it is a man made methodology to understand the natural world and therefore flawed! Trying to connect Allah's perfect religion to our flawed understanding of the natural world is problematic! And can create a lot of shubuhat because sciences understanding of things keep changing therefore nothing is ever certain and therefore not a fact.
YES! Pixels of reality! I've somehow always thought that this was the only explanation for physical space. By this logic, motion is instantaneous and simultaneous "de-existence" and "re-existence" of matter.
Hum. Abdullah. I just noticed your video a year too late. Impressed with the care taken compared to other treatments of the intersections of theology and science in the community. Much respect. I'll need to sit and think on your points and check out your greek and other references a bit more. Do you happen to have a reference list somewhere still for this video?
@masudsaleh5155 Astrobioligists, like who?? Science follows the evidence and finds a conclusion based on that evidence. Religion has a presupposed conclusion, then searches for evidence that will back up that conclusion. Hence why religion has very little, to NO evidence to support it.
Excellent video, May Allah bless you Just a small correction the ayah reference just before the 11 minute mark is 10:36 not 10:38. Looking forward to the debate review.
@@abdulazizb2154 1) It is not a stupid question. 2) If you want information about the universe, best address your questions to scientists. They may tell you that they don't know yet, and that is an honest answer. Believing that you have an answer because it is in a book written by comparatively ignorant, ancient peoples is not very honest, I am sorry to tell you. 3) If you ask the question "WHO created the universe?" (emphasis mine), you are assuming the answer in your question and that is not a good way to go about discovering the truth.
@@nabeel8194 Not necessarily. But if somebody is claiming the existence of something, s/he has to be able to demonstrate its existence with good, credible evidence, and that evidence has to produce the same, unique outcome no matter who tests it.
Jazakallah Khair. This was amazing. Could someone just re explain why time cannot be made up of infinitely small units otherwise there would be no time?
Excellent video brother... I would like to share a simple way in which a layperson like me think about this: Some of the underlying assumptions of doing science: -Reality exists -We have rationality -Contradictions does not exist None of these assumptions can be proven using science, because science already relies upon this. And doing so would be circular This is the simple reason why I believe that science is just a tool to use the human limited capability to observe the patterns that already exist in universe, which is good for developing working models, but it cannot be used as an ultimate source to explain reality
Good, now you got infinite posabilities as what ultimate source is, and regardles of what ultimate source is you choose to call it Allah(in that case you might not be muslim), and if you dont think anything can be that ultimate source then you have ~100% to be wrong. And that Allah told him to wear this funny cap.
I never understand why theists think god of the gaps is a good argument. So Zeus threw lightning... Until science could explain it and then he stopped? Nonsense.
If science cannot proof reality what can? To my knowledge it's the only human discipline which relies on testing, empirical observation, peer review & validated by experiment. I would be really curious to know what other tools can we have to understand reality.
Oh man, I get it but it’s a stretch. Brother and you all are all sincere, it feels good to feel your beliefs are confirmed. Tbh this line of thinking is problematic. I try to be open minded but not start with my belief as the goal and then work backwards.
Can you explain why a continuum instead of a succession of slices of space/time is not possible please brother? I understand quanta of energy and other physical properties are necessary, but why are quanta of spacetime required? This is the only thing I have trouble with in your argumentation. Jazak Allah khairan.
@@AbdullahalAndalusi jazak Allah khairan brother. Answer is 0mm, but I still struggle tot see how it helps. There are infinitely many real numbers of size 0 between 0 and 1 and we can still have a full interval of length 1. This is why I'm confused. Why isn't reality continuous like the interval (0,1) in mathematics in your opinion?
@@youteubakount4449 The number line assumes that a line already exists and then assigns one point on the line to 0 and another point on the line to 1 then we define the part of the line between the point of 0 and the point of 1 as an interval whose length is 0 - 1. It isn't that you add point after point after point _next to_ the point of 0 because, if continuity is assumed then there is no "next point".
Asalamu Aleykum akhi I wish that you also would fokus on more concrete aspects of research such as Peer Reviewed Meta analysis supporting evidences indicating existence of a God. You can keep your fokus on philosophy of science but it would also be nice to refer more to Peer Reviewed Meta analysis rather than individual scholars supporting your arguments because it feels to abstract from time to time. Love your channel and have a big respect for you, Hamza Tzortzis and Subboor Ahmed in this field. Jazakh Allahu Khayran Akhi
@@AbdullahalAndalusi many of the debates or videos I have seen of you and others, Aron Ra, Stop Spamming 1 and others are claiming that you, Hamza and Subboor are always refering to individual philosophers to prove the existence of a God rather than pointing to of what they claim as an established fact via Peer Reviewed Meta analysis. Peer Reviewed Meta analysis are stated by Aron Ra, Stop Spamming 1 etc to provide more reliable evidences to prove a certain point, (in this case God's existence) than individual philosophers statement would do. And I feel like this aspect has barely been responded to. Allahu A3lem
Its kind a Hard to explain it all here in the comment section. I wish I could meet you, Hamza and Subboor face to face, it would be much easier to explain My point. Problem is that I live in Sweden.
...and theists always either resort to their "holy books" or special pleading. Also, atheists "refuge" to "I don't know" if they have something that is unknown.
@@missbalgis3429 Atheists don’t deal in belief but rather facts, data and evidence. What we believe is backed-up by these things. Arguments that start-off with a hypothetical “if” or just assert that what they are saying “must” be true (without actually presenting evidence to support it) are extremely east to ignore. Something must be true when you have evidence to back it up. Until then it’s just an unsubstantiated claim. Hope that helps.
@@missbalgis3429 *sigh* His first argument at the 1m mark is a hypothetical with a few "if's". The second one is also a hypothetical with lots of "if's". There are more but I'm sure you can spend a bit of time finding them yourself. As for "musts"; 07:22 "we can infer that it must be produced by the action of something else that already exists" 08:13 "just using rational thinking alone but we know that they must exist at some point in the makeup of our reality" Hope that helps...
Assalamu Alaikum brother, I have a question. You said that length of a physical object has to be made up of discrete, indivisible chunks because otherwise we would have infinitely many infinitesimal chunks of no length which can't add up to any length at all. But does calculus not show us otherwise? In non standard analysis, we actually do have infinitely many infinitesimals "adding up" to some finite (non-zero) number. Now, I understand that numbers are mental constructs, but even then there is no reason for us to assume that these mental constructs don't have a correspondence with reality. Am I incorrect in my contention? If so, how? Jazakallah :)
I'll accede to your contention if you can demonstrate where these infinitesimals are. You see, mathematics is formal, based upon rules. The rules don't show infinitessimals exist, only that we can imagine they exist behind the rules we use. However, there are no infinitessimals, just rules. I could say that chess shows infinitessimals exist because you have to move a chess piece an infinite amount points to get to a finite distance. But in reality, that isn't really happening, but infinity is defined as that which can be exhausted. And so, as Zeno demonstrated , this causes paradoxes when applied to reality.
@@AbdullahalAndalusi So, infinitesimals exist logically (in the form of a bunch of axioms that govern what we can do with them) but not ontologically. Moreover, it is not that we are assuming that these mathematical objects have no correspondence with reality, but rather we can show that they can't have a correspondence with reality because otherwise, we will have absurdities like Zeno's paradoxes, Hilbert's hotel, etc. Thanks a lot, brother. I understand now :)
if you leave rational thinking at door you cant do science because even the experiments are done with rational thinking and we correct our theories by using reason if they dont agree with experiments but to know whether the experiments agree with our explained mechanisms we need rational thinking.The most notorious person i had seen regarding this is lawrence krauss he just makes fun of deductive reasoning but somebody should remember lawrence krauss that mathematics is mainly deduction and the same math is language of physics.
Just a couple of questions, who created the environment god came into, was god alone, how does a god come from nothing, I think this simulation is illusory, I has the appearance of being created, when actually its eternal. As in energy cannot be created or destroyed. The only time we experience is the now . Which people call the eternal now. The question does existence need a creator or is existence/ god the whole of everything?
@@AbdullahalAndalusi what's your thoughts on the islamic concepts of qadr / pre destination and the recent scientific experiments that seem to show things like "retro causality". For example the quantum eraser delayed choice experiment?
@@Adrian-yf1zg The equations make accurate predictions about the results of those experiments without considering retrocausality, so the experiments don't demonstrate retrocausality.
@@AbdullahalAndalusi true, but there is an unexplained element. Where retro causality could fit it in.... "science of the gaps" if you like. I find the idea of retro causality fascinating and very much in line with quranic ideas of "you earn your reward by your own actions" and when "calamity befalls you, it from what your own hands have earned". Also makes sense that Allah knows everything before it happens and all our actions have been written for us. While we also have a sort of "choice" that was determined by our actions. Also adds another response to those who argue about the problem of evil... These are just my thoughts
@@Adrian-yf1zg .. Here's my favourite retro-causality .. when Alexander Graham Bell invented the first Telephone .. he had two missed calls from Chuck Norris! 😂 Kidding!
Also speaking about quantum fluctuations, Sean Carroll explains a misconception about quantum fluctuations, it's not a phenomena which sub-atomic particles comes to existence, rather it is the appearances of particles. The particles are moving fast in the space so when we look at a specific place at one time it is a matter of probability to see it or not. In other words sometimes the particles are at the spot the we look, sometimes they don't.
1st of all forgive me if I make some grammar mistake because english is not main language Atheism simply means not believing in God. Two atheist can have totally difference views about universe, morals etc Many atheists that I know don't claim that universe came from noting. This strawman from religious folks that they keep repeat online. There is no example of something coming from noting or something becoming noting. There no evidence that universe was "noting" at any point. Even big bang theory does not say that universe came from "noting". This misconception that some people have. Big bang theory state that universe came from singularity, but this singularity already have all things that make up universe. Matter/energy can't be created and it can be destroyed, it only change shape and form. If I destroy your body with nuclear bomb, then all material that make up your body will still exist, it just that that your body will ripped apart but noting disappear. Similarly we can't create something out of noting. When we make car, we use material that already exist. Basically there is no example for anything coming out of noting and vice verse, and we don't even know if this is even possible
One video a week minimum please Abdullah
Share his video suboor
HONESTLY
Pretty please from me too
yep need to translate this series in other language
Bro abdullah for a sapience livestream?
Nice
Assalamualaikum Ustad. Happy To See You Back. Content, Edit, Top Quality.
Man sometimes I wish I was just book smart. And I know that sound silly but sometimes my brain can’t comprehend certain things. I’ve always been rubbish at science. Anyone else think their Imaan would be sky high if they were just academically smart. I mean like their brain can comprehend some complex stuff.. would be the best feeling ever.
উনার ডিবেটগুল বাংলা সাবটাইটেল করতে হবে।
বাংলাদেশে অধিকাংশ ইংরেজি বুঝে না।
আমাদের কাজ হচ্ছে কিন্তু অনেক কন্টেন্ট।
আপনি কি পারবেন আপনার চ্যানেল এ এনার ভিডিও বাংলা সাবটাইটেল তৈরি করতে
Jazaak Allahu Khairan Ustadh
I met Abdulla randomly in speakers corner, it was the summer of 2003, there was a heatwave. We spoke and he helped me find my way again. I was very surprised because I was an Arab from Arabia and he was a Brit. He gave me his email but my mail never went through. Good to see him after 17 long years.
Legit the production quality is possibly one of the highest I've seen in the dawah scene
The contents are presented in a very simplistic manner that even laymen and people with only basic scientific knowledge could understand, great video Ustadh.
That's because they are very simplistic ideas that only somebody with a very basic understanding of science, could possibly believe.
@@davexmit see what is total bunk? Religion or science?
@@davexmit Gotcha. 😁
@@righty-o3585 I'd be interested to see your response to this video then
@@nanashi2146 what video?
"Or were they created by nothing, or are they ˹their own˺ creators?
Or did they create the heavens and the earth? In fact, they have no firm belief ˹in Allah˺."
- Qur'an ( 52:35-36)
Please add subtitle for your videos or enable auto caption option.
@@MuhammadRishan youtube will do it automatically, it just takes time to process new videos
Life originated through natural means.
Who created your god?
Jazakallahu Khairun Ustad Abdullah.
May Allah give you success in this life and the next. Ameen.
this was GOLD. Walaikum Assalam brother. Love from Bangladesh.
Masya Allah BarakAllaahu fiikum jazakAllaahu khoir
JazakAllah Khairan brother
It was well worth the wait brother, Alhamdulillah.
Alhamdulillah,
I hope this would be the beginning of many fruitful and informational videos that we can learn from you Ustadh. Always waiting to see more of you. Jazakallah for your efforts.
Alhamdulilah you're back akhi.
This video is a gem. How does it not have more views!?
because its full of nonsense lol
@@kingmadridi8125 you claim that but you provide no evidence for your claim, to any sane person it would seem ur full of nonsense
@@kuhabazak
- saying rational thinking when in fact its just a personal opinion , you can't be biased and claim your using rational thinking
- using personal opinions to disprove science
- working hard to disprove science because it expose your silly religion , zero credibility
- hyping up your religion while putting down science because it can't give you an answer to a certain something , when in reality religion can't give you an answer either (saying a invisible sky daddy abra kadabra everything is not an answer)
want more or that is enough ?
"any sane person" ?
rofl you believe in a god that will burn and torture people for eternity because they simply didn't believe in him even though he doesn't need our worshiping
you believe that god is the most loving and merciful lol you all need to be put in a mental hospital asap
so don't talk about sanity again cause you just made yourself look like a big joke
@@kingmadridi8125 is that all you can do?
@@MahayarMuttaqin-fn9ko What's your objection exactly ? the truth hurts you too much ?
May Allah bless abdullah with the best of both worlds ameen
He is back! mashallah
Superb One!! You will always get educated listening to Abdullah Andalusi.
Yesss. Alhamdulillah your first video of hopefully a streak is here!
Alhamdulilah you're back akhi!
7:46 bro really just said an infinitesimal is equivalent to nothing. Someone didnt take calculus.
I feel like if Abdullah and Hamza Tzortzis were to form a team, they could debate anyone on the existence of God or the truth of Islam and no one will ever be able to sufficiently challenge their arguments. I would love to see that happen in the future
May Allah reward you immensely for you efforts.
mashaa'Allah. I'm so interested in this topic but unfortunately I haven't found anything on RUclips on this subject which isn't by Atheists who try and put their spin on it.
Keep up the good work Brother
Whole modern physics is done by atheist, don't let that stop you from discovering beauty how world around you works.
JazakAllah Khair! Sir, for this amazing work. Even today, some Muslims tends to ignore the scientific facts thinking that science has nothing to do with our Imaan. I argue that understanding science (not vague theories like evolution) can bring us closer to Allah Azzawajal. I learned to connect science and Islam from the late Dr Israr Ahmed, I remembered his statement that science is a gift from Allah to mankind. SubhanAllah! Sir, we need people like him and you to fill in this gap. May Allah reward you!
Looking forward to following up on your videos!
There is nothing called "Scientific fact" When muslims say that science has nothing to do with our Iman we mean that it is a man made methodology to understand the natural world and therefore flawed! Trying to connect Allah's perfect religion to our flawed understanding of the natural world is problematic! And can create a lot of shubuhat because sciences understanding of things keep changing therefore nothing is ever certain and therefore not a fact.
Excellent video. Well articulated.
Great editing btw!
جزاك الله خيرا كثيرا استاذ
magnificent exposition and presentation
continue and make more may Allah aid and bless you
Looking forward for the the second part of this video. Thanks a lot
YES! Pixels of reality! I've somehow always thought that this was the only explanation for physical space.
By this logic, motion is instantaneous and simultaneous "de-existence" and "re-existence" of matter.
Hum. Abdullah. I just noticed your video a year too late. Impressed with the care taken compared to other treatments of the intersections of theology and science in the community. Much respect. I'll need to sit and think on your points and check out your greek and other references a bit more. Do you happen to have a reference list somewhere still for this video?
Thank you for making this! I’m looking forward to your next video, very thought provoking!
Commenting for referencement
Science is the study of reality.
@masudsaleh5155 Astrobioligists, like who?? Science follows the evidence and finds a conclusion based on that evidence. Religion has a presupposed conclusion, then searches for evidence that will back up that conclusion. Hence why religion has very little, to NO evidence to support it.
"Rational thinking is just a totology" that is a slap in the face.
Tautology*
Can you please upload the next video? JAK!
Really enjoyed this thorough and well-detailed video. May Allah bless you ustadh, Cant wait for more content inshaAllah
Brother this video was very insightful, when are you going to post the next one?
Beyond the border of reality … is imagination.
Mashallah! Excellent video!
Jak such a well done video mashallah. Keep it up!
This video is fantastic. Jazakallahu Khayran
*_Masha'Allah_*
Masha’Allah, you’ve put my thoughts on this subject in such a beautifully succinct way. This video has to be shared to all.
Excellent video, May Allah bless you
Just a small correction the ayah reference just before the 11 minute mark is 10:36 not 10:38. Looking forward to the debate review.
Thank you, I've made a note of the typo in the description, 6 was accidentally typed as 8.
This video is underrated.
Truth will overcome false hood ,mutter of time
Who Created God? Can you simplify the answer to this question
See the first video on my channel. It answers the question of who created God in a simple manner
the people who raise that stupid question9atheists) did they always asked who created the universe?
@@abdulazizb2154 1) It is not a stupid question. 2) If you want information about the universe, best address your questions to scientists. They may tell you that they don't know yet, and that is an honest answer. Believing that you have an answer because it is in a book written by comparatively ignorant, ancient peoples is not very honest, I am sorry to tell you. 3) If you ask the question "WHO created the universe?" (emphasis mine), you are assuming the answer in your question and that is not a good way to go about discovering the truth.
@@Nai61a do you believe science is the only way of knowing something?
@@nabeel8194 Not necessarily. But if somebody is claiming the existence of something, s/he has to be able to demonstrate its existence with good, credible evidence, and that evidence has to produce the same, unique outcome no matter who tests it.
ALLAHU AKBAR. PLEASE BROTHER STAY ACTIV
Jazakallah Khair. This was amazing. Could someone just re explain why time cannot be made up of infinitely small units otherwise there would be no time?
If time were made up of an infinite amount of moments that had 'no seconds', would time have any duration?
@@AbdullahalAndalusi Ahhh I see. Thanks a lot sheikh and May Allah accept your work
We are waiting for your video from Bangladesh
Well said, and you're right, Abdullah.
اَللهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَى آلِ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ
Good video Abdullah
Masha Allah, So well put and easily explained
masyaallah miss u so much bro
Very insightful, these basics are so important. Looking forward to building new ideas together with you
Great editing. You should do more of these.
Excellent video brother...
I would like to share a simple way in which a layperson like me think about this:
Some of the underlying assumptions of doing science:
-Reality exists
-We have rationality
-Contradictions does not exist
None of these assumptions can be proven using science, because science already relies upon this. And doing so would be circular
This is the simple reason why I believe that science is just a tool to use the human limited capability to observe the patterns that already exist in universe, which is good for developing working models, but it cannot be used as an ultimate source to explain reality
Good, now you got infinite posabilities as what ultimate source is, and regardles of what ultimate source is you choose to call it Allah(in that case you might not be muslim), and if you dont think anything can be that ultimate source then you have ~100% to be wrong. And that Allah told him to wear this funny cap.
@@mpetkovic26 Good to know that people at least dismiss scientism. Thanks for being honest.
@@azharnasar493 it is the best way we learn about those things
Excellent vid sheikh.. jazakallah..
I never understand why theists think god of the gaps is a good argument. So Zeus threw lightning... Until science could explain it and then he stopped? Nonsense.
Brilliant
If science cannot proof reality what can? To my knowledge it's the only human discipline which relies on testing, empirical observation, peer review & validated by experiment. I would be really curious to know what other tools can we have to understand reality.
Did you watch the video?
This is something people like Aron ra and krauss don't get
Ma sha Allah very well done
It's so great to see you back on RUclips brother.
Assalamualaikum. Welcome back brother. Sincere Fadhil from Malaysia
Amazing, bro! BARAKALLAHU FIK.
Oh man, I get it but it’s a stretch. Brother and you all are all sincere, it feels good to feel your beliefs are confirmed. Tbh this line of thinking is problematic. I try to be open minded but not start with my belief as the goal and then work backwards.
Still waiting for that history of kalam series
I've never promised a history of kalam series, perhaps you're thinking of someone else?
Mashaallah. Brilliant
Can you explain why a continuum instead of a succession of slices of space/time is not possible please brother? I understand quanta of energy and other physical properties are necessary, but why are quanta of spacetime required? This is the only thing I have trouble with in your argumentation. Jazak Allah khairan.
If space was made out of a continuum of infinite points of no-length, say we cal it "0mm", how much length is 0mm + 0mm + 0mm + 0mm.... ad infinitum?
@@AbdullahalAndalusi jazak Allah khairan brother. Answer is 0mm, but I still struggle tot see how it helps. There are infinitely many real numbers of size 0 between 0 and 1 and we can still have a full interval of length 1. This is why I'm confused. Why isn't reality continuous like the interval (0,1) in mathematics in your opinion?
Numbers don't exist, unless you're a platonist
@@youteubakount4449 The number line assumes that a line already exists and then assigns one point on the line to 0 and another point on the line to 1 then we define the part of the line between the point of 0 and the point of 1 as an interval whose length is 0 - 1. It isn't that you add point after point after point _next to_ the point of 0 because, if continuity is assumed then there is no "next point".
Asalamu Aleykum akhi I wish that you also would fokus on more concrete aspects of research such as Peer Reviewed Meta analysis supporting evidences indicating existence of a God.
You can keep your fokus on philosophy of science but it would also be nice to refer more to Peer Reviewed Meta analysis rather than individual scholars supporting your arguments because it feels to abstract from time to time. Love your channel and have a big respect for you, Hamza Tzortzis and Subboor Ahmed in this field. Jazakh Allahu Khayran Akhi
wa alaikum salam, please give an example to illustrate your point.
@@AbdullahalAndalusi many of the debates or videos I have seen of you and others, Aron Ra, Stop Spamming 1 and others are claiming that you, Hamza and Subboor are always refering to individual philosophers to prove the existence of a God rather than pointing to of what they claim as an established fact via Peer Reviewed Meta analysis.
Peer Reviewed Meta analysis are stated by Aron Ra, Stop Spamming 1 etc to provide more reliable evidences to prove a certain point, (in this case God's existence) than individual philosophers statement would do. And I feel like this aspect has barely been responded to. Allahu A3lem
Its kind a Hard to explain it all here in the comment section. I wish I could meet you, Hamza and Subboor face to face, it would be much easier to explain My point. Problem is that I live in Sweden.
You're back ! Oh my God you are!
Finallyyyyy!!!
This is brilliantly put. 👏
Mashallah Amazing video man :O was hooked from the start
Please continue to make more
Atheists always refuge to quantum mechanics to escape to questions unsolvable by science.
This video should be series.
Very good quality.
...and theists always either resort to their "holy books" or special pleading.
Also, atheists "refuge" to "I don't know" if they have something that is unknown.
he back!
Nice Physics and Din the best 2 topics for me. Especially Quantum mechanics.
Good job Brother.
MaShaAllah
اسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Why is it really hard to convince atheist this way of thinking and find God?
Becasue arguments and assertions with "must" or "if" don't mean anything to us.
@@martinblank1484 Could you elaborate your point, please?
@@missbalgis3429
Atheists don’t deal in belief but rather facts, data and evidence. What we believe is backed-up by these things. Arguments that start-off with a hypothetical “if” or just assert that what they are saying “must” be true (without actually presenting evidence to support it) are extremely east to ignore. Something must be true when you have evidence to back it up. Until then it’s just an unsubstantiated claim.
Hope that helps.
@@martinblank1484 okay... Well, could you point out the "if" and "must" example from the speech by the speaker of this video, please?
@@missbalgis3429 *sigh*
His first argument at the 1m mark is a hypothetical with a few "if's". The second one is also a hypothetical with lots of "if's".
There are more but I'm sure you can spend a bit of time finding them yourself. As for "musts";
07:22 "we can infer that it must be produced by the action of something else that already exists"
08:13 "just using rational thinking alone but we know that they must exist at some point in the makeup of our reality"
Hope that helps...
Love this ustadh ^^
Assalamu Alaikum brother, I have a question.
You said that length of a physical object has to be made up of discrete, indivisible chunks because otherwise we would have infinitely many infinitesimal chunks of no length which can't add up to any length at all.
But does calculus not show us otherwise? In non standard analysis, we actually do have infinitely many infinitesimals "adding up" to some finite (non-zero) number.
Now, I understand that numbers are mental constructs, but even then there is no reason for us to assume that these mental constructs don't have a correspondence with reality.
Am I incorrect in my contention? If so, how?
Jazakallah :)
I'll accede to your contention if you can demonstrate where these infinitesimals are. You see, mathematics is formal, based upon rules. The rules don't show infinitessimals exist, only that we can imagine they exist behind the rules we use. However, there are no infinitessimals, just rules. I could say that chess shows infinitessimals exist because you have to move a chess piece an infinite amount points to get to a finite distance. But in reality, that isn't really happening, but infinity is defined as that which can be exhausted. And so, as Zeno demonstrated , this causes paradoxes when applied to reality.
@@AbdullahalAndalusi So, infinitesimals exist logically (in the form of a bunch of axioms that govern what we can do with them) but not ontologically. Moreover, it is not that we are assuming that these mathematical objects have no correspondence with reality, but rather we can show that they can't have a correspondence with reality because otherwise, we will have absurdities like Zeno's paradoxes, Hilbert's hotel, etc.
Thanks a lot, brother. I understand now :)
Amazing video
We need more videos, brother.
if you leave rational thinking at door you cant do science because even the experiments are done with rational thinking and we correct our theories by using reason if they dont agree with experiments but to know whether the experiments agree with our explained mechanisms we need rational thinking.The most notorious person i had seen regarding this is lawrence krauss he just makes fun of deductive reasoning but somebody should remember lawrence krauss that mathematics is mainly deduction and the same math is language of physics.
Subhanallah
My Question is
How does Islam fit in to explain the world or reality
Byrational thinking and evidence
When science can not ??
Just a couple of questions, who created the environment god came into, was god alone, how does a god come from nothing, I think this simulation is illusory, I has the appearance of being created, when actually its eternal. As in energy cannot be created or destroyed. The only time we experience is the now . Which people call the eternal now. The question does existence need a creator or is existence/ god the whole of everything?
the Most clear way of explaining. Subhanallah
Is time the same as causality?
No, one describes change, the other describe dependence (for the existence of one event/thing, on an another event/thing)
@@AbdullahalAndalusi what's your thoughts on the islamic concepts of qadr / pre destination and the recent scientific experiments that seem to show things like "retro causality".
For example the quantum eraser delayed choice experiment?
@@Adrian-yf1zg The equations make accurate predictions about the results of those experiments without considering retrocausality, so the experiments don't demonstrate retrocausality.
@@AbdullahalAndalusi true, but there is an unexplained element. Where retro causality could fit it in.... "science of the gaps" if you like.
I find the idea of retro causality fascinating and very much in line with quranic ideas of "you earn your reward by your own actions" and when "calamity befalls you, it from what your own hands have earned". Also makes sense that Allah knows everything before it happens and all our actions have been written for us. While we also have a sort of "choice" that was determined by our actions.
Also adds another response to those who argue about the problem of evil... These are just my thoughts
@@Adrian-yf1zg .. Here's my favourite retro-causality .. when Alexander Graham Bell invented the first Telephone .. he had two missed calls from Chuck Norris! 😂 Kidding!
This is ART
Also speaking about quantum fluctuations, Sean Carroll explains a misconception about quantum fluctuations, it's not a phenomena which sub-atomic particles comes to existence, rather it is the appearances of particles. The particles are moving fast in the space so when we look at a specific place at one time it is a matter of probability to see it or not. In other words sometimes the particles are at the spot the we look, sometimes they don't.
1st of all forgive me if I make some grammar mistake because english is not main language
Atheism simply means not believing in God. Two atheist can have totally difference views about universe, morals etc
Many atheists that I know don't claim that universe came from noting. This strawman from religious folks that they keep repeat online.
There is no example of something coming from noting or something becoming noting. There no evidence that universe was "noting" at any point. Even big bang theory does not say that universe came from "noting". This misconception that some people have. Big bang theory state that universe came from singularity, but this singularity already have all things that make up universe.
Matter/energy can't be created and it can be destroyed, it only change shape and form. If I destroy your body with nuclear bomb, then all material that make up your body will still exist, it just that that your body will ripped apart but noting disappear. Similarly we can't create something out of noting. When we make car, we use material that already exist. Basically there is no example for anything coming out of noting and vice verse, and we don't even know if this is even possible
AWESOME
This awesome, Love this video
Dude more of this kind of videos please!!!!!