Why The Hi Fly Airbus A380 Wasn’t A Success
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 дек 2021
- To date, there has only been one second-hand operator of an Airbus A380. However, this lasted just three years, with the aircraft being retired around a year ago. On paper, a huge wet lease aircraft may seem like a great idea, but sadly it didn’t turn out that way for many reasons. Let’s look at why...
Article link: simpleflying.com/hi-fly-airbu...
Video sources:
• A Tribute to Hi Fly A3...
• Hi Fly A380 Farewell F...
• Hi Fly A380 overflying...
• "SAVE THE CORAL REEFS"...
A380 Hi Fly dE0AXBFtAZc.mp4
A380 hi Fly MAVwZN8vr6Q.mp4
Hi Fly fleet a380 a340 a330 a320 XzhQaNEIQSY.mp4
Brussels storage
Austria Storage
Qatar Storage
An225 • Antonov AN-225 cargo t...
Simple Flying:
Visit our website where we publish 150-200 news stories per week: simpleflying.com/
Listen to our weekly podcast: simpleflying.com/podcast/
Download our iOS & Android app: simpleflying.com/simple-flyin...
Daily email digest sign up: simpleflying.com/daily-digest/
Check out our second RUclips channel: / @longhaulbysimpleflying
Follow us on social media:
Instagram: / simpleflyingnews
Twitter: / simple_flying
Facebook: / simpleflyingnews
Linkedin: / 33222643
#aviation #flight #avgeek #airlines #flying
I'l take that is a yes. Previous video about A380, 25 A380s are retired however today confirm or not that number rise to 31 A380s because Thai Airways A380s are disappeared from the current fleet yesterday.
Thai announced A380 retirement in Feb so no big surprise. But it’s sad. I’ll miss Thai F class.
I always found it weird that the famous Singapore Airlines Suites were being used for this sub par airline at a ridiculously cheap price.
Now THIS is an interesting topic! 👀
I think the retirement was a mistake, at least in long term. After the pandemic is over, there might be some need for the Hifly A380 again. Be it for higher capacity on a specific route, as a replacement plane or any other reason.
I hope Hifly will bring back the A380 in better times!
Unlikely "mistake". It was always a test of the model for the purpose and it simply didn't work. It only made sense on peak travel times and very limited in the airports it could serve. Not enough flexibility.
point to point travel says no
From a strictly business perspective they made the right decision. Only emotion would lead someone to want to use this plane again. It's too big to fill and run efficiently. It's expensive to maintain. Limited airport compatibility.
No second hand market. By the time flight patterns return to pre 2019 levels, the plane will be too inefficient due to more efficient widebodies like the 777x and the A350. Those planes have lesser capacity so they will be easier to fill and operate efficiently.
The A380 was a technological marvel but a business and economic failure. Impressive engineering in some ways but Airbus lost billions on it. It only has a place in some peoples nostalgia.
how about emirates
@@biscuit4235 They were the one exception that it worked for them. But even they are moving to smaller aircraft over time. They will phase them out over time and would likely do so faster if they could.
The 380 was obsolete from the time of it's introduction. The move to large twins was well underway when in it entered service.
@@johniii8147 I bet they would be phasing them out now if the 777X was available.
@@davemiller6055 Those are coming, but with the Pandemic few are in any big hurry to take the 777X yet or widebodies in general. EK will retire them as the leases are up.
I think really sad, but a reasonable decision. That livery is just so cool!
I'm surprised that the US Military or even NATO hasn't got hold of some second hand A-380's to be honest, both use aircraft to ferry troops around the World all year round so I'm sure they could make use of them.
I hope this aircraft, like many A380’s will fly again !
Yes
really need to see the whale in the sky again 😢😢😢😢 it is the most majestic aircraft ever flown!!!
Nah 747
Yeah
The big weakness of the A380 is that it wasn't built for pure cargo -- the flight deck was placed too low for a nose door and it's too weak to have a good MTOW for its size -- unlike the 747 which is essentially an airfreighter with seats bolted on. While it's great for people, repurposing it for a post-passenger life would be like trying to load containers onto a cruise ship~ it simply doesn't work. Then there's the costs of operating four engines when two are just as powerful and reliable nowadays.
Twin engine long haul narrow bodies are the future as technology advances.
They have been for awhile now. Not a new trend.
@@johniii8147 I was actually thinking about airliners with 6500 + nautical mile range. I cannot think of any narrow body planes that have that much range, that are currently in production
@@averagejoe9249 No there are no narrow bodies in the that range category but there have been twin engine wides for a long time now in that range. 6500 + range for a narrow body isn't on the the horizon. They will max out in the 4000-4500 range. You need the size and space of a widebody to make it beyond that with even the most modern technology. The narrow bodies will be used on East Coast transatlantic and regional asian routes. Much as we already saw with the 757.
Disappointing, but I get why
Well I am sure the people of Afghanistan would have appreciated a few of these huge planes a few months ago. Oh well. Gracias por esta pelicula.
There's an A380 parked in Paris Air and Space museum. I visited there last month. I guess it is one of their A380.
use them in the military as troop transports , or conver to tankers maybe.
Here within 1000 views
Who was the previous owner of Hi fly A380??
Singapore Airlines
@@justanaviationguy11 thanks buddy👍
@@manasraj5909 you're welcome
Fun fact: Aerolineas Estelar was the first Americas airline in history to operate the A380.
Very sad that this special A380 vanished
AEROSUCRE should buy it!
it was the only a380 that came to YUL recently
Why can’t there be a passenger version of the Beluga Airbus. It’s a twin engine plane with a large capacity
It’s about volume, NOT weight. Fuselage parts are hollow and therefore comparably light.
Also, the cargo hold is designed to be a cargo hold and nothing else, it’s for example not pressurized and the Beluga lacks basic features like a door for passengers, lavatories and so on.
Also, you seem to overestimate the range of a Beluga, it’s good for flights between the European Airbus plants but nothing else.
Should talk about where Malaysian airlines 777s have gone to
What is there to talk about?
@@Paraffinmeister1. reasons why they have been removed
2. Their new operators
3. Could they look at the 777x as a future order….
The A380 is just to big.
Many airport's and terminals can't prepare accommodations for an airplane this size
A380 is too big an aircraft for the time. Plus maintaining and operating this aircraft is an expensive proposition. Be it structural or systems or engine.
If the company was putting more money out to operate the aircraft than it was making, then absolutely🙂.
How has emirates managed this plane
no
If it’s an a380, it’s a failure
it was the first a380 and only and the last to fly to the Dominican republic
Hola amigos
Fun fact:this A380 was the first A380 to ever land in any Dominican airport
I'm going to bid on it when they put it on Ebay with a £1 start and no reserve. Should get it for a couple of hundred quid. Then I'm going to put it in my garden and turn it into a hen house. I'm now eating a wagon wheel and facing East.
It’s not the first time I’m spotting this mistake of yours so I’ll go ahead and correct you :
The French city you’re referring to is Tarbes, not Tabres. The R is before the B. Pronounced TARB’ (no “s” sound)
You can contact us about corrections here simpleflying.com/corrections/ - TB
Simple answer: because of greedy corporations, we can't have Nice Things.
Yes