This is pretty accurate but from history, empires that are too big, start to fall like dominoes after a while. There would be too much area to defend, resistance would come up everywhere, making it hard to control as well.
Possibly, but it depends. With modern 1940s+ technology, information can spread much faster than in the past, and dissidents and rebels can be dealt with before things get out of hand in your satellite states. By controlling the media, narratives, and exterminating your opposition; there's not much opportunity for resistance to grow to such a level that it can oppose a global authoritarian coalition. And there wouldn't be anything like a free internet for people to unite and create movements against the new world order. Geopolitically, the world only gets smaller and smaller as technology grows more powerful, and those who wield it would be able to see almost everything. Also without opposing economic power blocs to balance out the power of such a global government, resistance movements would find it difficult to obtain funding, weapons, etc to get off the ground and gain the traction they need.
I think that's true hitherto but I think that reading 1984 you see that Oceania was controlled through thought and technology and I think (know) there's an empire that's coming that will be controlled exactly like that.
@@rogerphelps9939 I am sure that would be the opinion of the people who lived in those areas. But they do not count as 'the world', and the video is titled 'Hitler's plans for the world if he won' which indicates that it was going to discuss the world. Perhaps it should have been titled 'Hitler's plans for Europe and the USA if he won'. I come from a small island about the size of England on the opposite side of the world from Europe and I actually know what Hitler's plans were for my island. Most people on my island do because locally it was big news when it was uncovered in ruins about the time of my childhood decades ago. I would have liked to have known what his concrete plans were for other parts of the world. Same with the other axis leaders. That would make for a great video.
this seems pretty accurate, but I think just like many great empires like Rome it would be hard to control all that land and there would be hundreds of rebellions at once most Likely
My mom and dad lived during WW2 in the states. He worked in a big factory, she was a stay home wife taking care of the kids and house. I once asked her when did she finally hear all about of the death camps. She said not until the war was over did any of the information come out. A lot of the news about the war was heavily censored. They only heard basic bits and pieces the government allowed the public to know. From what I got from her, a lot of the general public was shocked later to find out what was going on and they had no clue…
While my granddad was underground, transported jewelry across the ocean with his resistance comrades, my grandmom worked 3 jobs, took care of their family and home, paid the bills and did it all proudly. I don't know where you are from but your grandparents sounds rich compared to a lot of other occupation people.
i love seeing these different interpretations because it makes me think what the circumstances would've been like, thanks for making videos like these :)
There's a novel called "The Man in the High Castle" by Philip K. Dick that's depicts this exact scenario. It's a quick read and seems like a fairly accurate snapshot to me.
@@africa1st737 "Africa went thru worse" First off.. in what way?? Secondly, Africa is a continent. Not an individual country. That like someone saying "Asia had it worse". Africa is a diverse and beautiful land. Its home to thousands of cultures and dozens of religions. Finally.. Is it a competition to you ? Do you even know what the op is talking about?
One thing to keep in mind in this scenario - in real life, it was insane for Germany and Japan to go to war with the USA just on the basis of manufacturing capacity alone. In one year, each of the US’s “Big Three” car manufacturers on its own outproduced Germany, Japan and Italy combined. The US was also self-sufficient in oil as well as most of the other crucial raw materials too. Well-informed high-ranking military strategists in Germany and Japan were well aware of this situation but had to go along with war regardless.
There was a interesting comment after D day form a solider tasked with counting the horses (most army's still used horses for supplies), he wrote when I could not see a single horse on those beaches I knew the war was lost.
@@rascototalwar8618 In fact the British Army had few horses at all by 1940. The US army had NONE on overseas service. It was only the boasting germans who had horse power.
Yeah but if they could’ve mass-produce there tiger tank or even the Panzer Mark IV they would’ve won the Tiger tank had like 15 Shermans to one tiger tank if you actually kept the tiger tanks up and number and actually working yet we wouldn’t have stood a chance it don’t matter how many people you got if you got over over 100 tiger tanks come in at ya and each one is worth 15 Sherman‘s but there wasn’t a mass production of the tiger tank which is One of the problems they had because it was too costly to produce and it was rushed low-key he could’ve won he was supposed to start the war in 1940 when he had like eight battleships two carriers 300 subs he only had half the amount of subs he needed in order to successfully take over the world but his arrogance and ignorance cost way he had wanted he had rushed it way too quickly
@@fischerswherethefunisright123 We would have just made new higher powered bazookas and anti tank weapons. our Shermans were infinitely customizable. you could fit a massive gun on a Sherman capable of defeating heavier sloped tank armor. first comment is so true though we outproduced ever nation in the world combined in nearly every resource. The germans even if they defeated all of europe would have to have at least negotiated with the US they would not have been able to defeat us soundly, if anything it would have been a cold war with Germany instead of Russia. once nuclear weapons enter the scene it's cold war because nobody wants to get hit once.
@@fischerswherethefunisright123 The Tiger Tank and Panzer were inferior, not because they weren't good. They were. They took too long to make, too long to train people, and were way too expensive. The US could make about 10 Sherman tanks for one Tiger. Not only that the Sherman was designed to be taken for parts from other tanks. It was modular system. Even production facilities for them could be easily setup overseas. In fact the US was planning to start production of war supplies in France and the UK. They already setup some in the UK in about 6 months. The Germans were already moving away from their classic designs btw once they realized in a prolong modern war with shortages having really expensive and long production times for weapons were about as realistic as building Huge Battleships that take 15 years to make.
Japan likely wouldn’t have invaded the Soviet Union only because they genuinely wanted to knock the U.S. out of the war. All Japan would have to do is keep the impression up that they would invade the Soviet Union to tie up Soviet troops in the Far East. This would’ve given the Germans an easier road to Moscow in 1941 because in actual history Moscow was saved by far eastern reserves. Even if Moscow falls in 1941 the Germans would still need to launch a southern offensive to take Russian oil as lack of oil was the biggest problem facing the Germans. Also we shouldn’t assume the fall Moscow is the end of the Soviet Union. Stalin almost certainly would’ve fought on. Moscow is a symbolic loss but likely not a enough to win the war for Germany
yeahhh generally when wars happen and important cities are taken it doesnt immediately mean it's the end of the country but well the most important city's gone that's a problem. gotta get that back then. Like Paris. Japan did it w/ China once, too.
Stalin himself said he would stay in Moscow and fight until the end. Therefore, taking Moscow would have shatterred Soviet even though it wouldnt have finished Soviet right away.
Japan was using up the majority of their resources and manpower fighting China at the time, which was a very costly war for them. They probably wouldn't have been able to invade the Soviet Union anyway.
Thanks for mentioning contribution of 2.5 million indian soldiers in WW2 , many historians very often overlook it. Besides WW2 expenses of great britain was funded by India and other colonies.. You also very well mentioned double standard of western nations for anti-semitism and racism...
I think the issue is not so much overlooked as much as everyone is lumped in under "Britain." But that's merely a convenient header, the British themselves tend to be aware of the vast contributions made by you, the Australians, Canadians and many other countries. It's acknowledged in our Remembrance and in our War Cemetaries and is a core part of the Commonwealth. We did not do right by India in so many ways, but when it really came down to the wire you put all that aside for the greater good. Please know it is acknowledged, appreciated and the huge boost we received from countries unimaginably far away helped us through the years of attrition (my mother was a child in WW2, her father fought in WW1.) We felt pretty lonely in Europe, all of you held us up. So thank you.
I'll second that! I hope humanity can learn to look past our differences because we all have so much more in common. I'd much rather celebrate that than fight anybody 🤗 Keep well, my friend.
But Canada wasn't a dominion of the British empire by then. They got independence in 1931. It's why Canada was free to declare war on Germany for itself in WW2 (which it did)
Canada gained independence after the First World War and it wasn’t technically a dominion of Britain so it wouldn’t have fallen at the same time as Britain, there is the possibility that Canada would have surrendered but I feel like that would be a last resort.
They’d probably just join up with the U.S, don’t forget Canada declared war on Japan before the U.S did after Pearl Harbor and they took a beach at Normandy. Canada were true brothers during WW2
As a British dominion, Australia declared war in line with the UK on September 3rd, 1939. Early involvements included Australian pilots in the Battle of Britain and Australian divisions fighting in North Africa- most notably, the ‘Rats of Tobruk’.
Philosophically its important to understand why the communists and nazis were so vehemently against each other. They are often categorized as "right" and "left" but they had a common mission: reaching the predestined end of human history. The communists believed the system was oppressive and had to be torn down and replaced; the nazis believed structures were how you got there, but you had to get rid of the weaklings holding it back. It was either about championing the underdog concept or the overdog concept. They were fighting over what they thought was the same prize but they thought the other side was the absolute opposite way, thats why so many atrocities were thought were necessary: they believe human history was progressing to a predetermined point, and that they had to be on the right side of it.
I always just thought of them as Godless heathens with little thought of how they got to be who they were. It’s a lot like putting up a mile long fence. If your second post is just 1/4 inch off center by the time you get to the end of that mile you have missed the target by a lot.
Looking back on history and constructing pausible "what-ifs" scenarios based in believable outcomes has got to be the single most interesting way to prevent it from repeating itself. Next time humanity faces a scenario this bleak, it will be much harder to prevent it from ending up this way.
@@gavinponatoski5798 sooooo let me get this straight... in your opinion a country is considered independent only when they have their own flag. does that mean that america only became independent in june 14 1977 since thats when they commissioned their official flag? because if so, mate yall celebrating ur independence on the wrong day.
But those were facts. It's not the same to have your endless food-producing fields, your enormous-demanding resources and your labour forces in your backyard (like the US and the USSR) than thousands of kilometres overseas. And against the most advanced military force in the world at that time. I read a lot about WW2 and am still amazes me how British managed not only to prevent nazis to land and conquer Britain, but to organize themselves to continue daily life in the middle of a war. And without Churchill, the outcome would surely have been different.
The video is full of problems. It’s about a 2/10 on historical understanding. The problem is it’s so wrong and clings to a simplified, baseline historical narrative that people often get exposed to in public schools, that correcting the mistaken info people get from it is close to impossible.
England was easy pickings since it was an island. Germany simply could have starved them out. England has limited resources and relies on the countries it conquered to supply they with oil and food. Germany ran out of oil itself, and extended itself beyond its capacity. Had they not done this they would have won.
@@That.Guy. It's not bud. The dems have been doing the same thing since their founding. They just changed targets. Burning, looting, donning hoods, taking advantage of social issues, creating problems to fix? Using smear tactics? They will say anything to anyone to retain power. They actually already have... We didn't defeat the Nazis. We became them.
I think the war could have ended this way with just 1 or 2 changes. The first atomic bombs appeared just a few years later - imagine if the Germans had access to those in 1938 - but that's only 7 years before they were actually used. Jet engines are a similar story - arriving just at the end of the conflict, too late to have any impact. I imagine if just a few engineers and scientists had made different decisions the entire story could have been very different. The Germans had the V2 - imagine that with an atomic warhead. Doesn't bare thinking about, really.
Good "what-if" analysis. The Germans were closer, theoretically, to the hydrogen bomb, than the US was. However, the Germans didn't have the resources to execute atomic bomb development.
@@heavyassaultmode1503 there's a really amazing story of a couple of Norwegian commandos sinking a ferry containing Germany's entire stock (at the time) of heavy water. That set them back quite a While as it's slow and painstaking to produce
yes back then maybe but so much division and people who are not interested in their fellow people anymore sadly i don’t think we would have the same outcome my dad was in the raf during the war as a navigator on the lancasters its a shame that they have spoken (as they should) highly of the battle of britain but the raf were seen as an embarrassment yet they were pivotal in winning the war for the uk
@@mogenvonbogel7342 Not really. Historians try to find the truth of historical events as far as they possibly can, having the accounts of both sides in a conflict allows them to cross reference and come to better conclusions.
Australia joined the war the day Britain declared war- as did every country in the Commonwealth. Took a while for our troops to get there because we are Geographically a long way away.
there's a mistake in the graphic at 2:40 see, it has the danish peninsula of Jylland (Justland) and the island of Fyn (Funen) marked as occupied, but the island Sjælland (Zealand) is not red. I assume this is because the artist who made the graphic assumed that island to be part of Sweden, but the reality is that Sjælland is home to our capital city of Copenhagen
I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜
It's worth noting that Russia managed to hold off the German invasion for the first year only thanks to British and American intervention. The British sent over 5000 tanks and 7000 aircraft, and the Americans over 13000 tanks and 14000 aircraft. In total, the allies sent the soviets nearly 1$ trillion worth of aid (adjusted for inflation). For comparison, by 1942, the Germans only had produced 5500 tanks in total. If the British were working for the Nazis and the Americans would remain neutral, the Soviet Union would have collapsed.
The Soviet Union had a stronger military than the Germans from the beggining. Even if the Americans and British didn't intervene the USSR would still defeat Germany.
If WW2 history is your thing then Dover on the south east coast of UK is a great visit. Dover castle, Spitfire museum and the RAF Memorial are all great places to visit.
The Man In the High Castle explores what life might have been like had Japan and Germany successfully invaded America. It’s a half decent series but you have to suspend your disbelief quite massively at times.
@@jobeergamingtv8962 I think it means like the chickens that create and lay the eggs aren’t the ones to present them because of humans(victors: the ones making profit by presenting/frying eggs), and are see as the producers. Put that into Historical terms, History is always written by the victor, because in general the defeated don’t always explain it from their side of the story, could be disagreed BECAUSE of the blame they took from the history or wtv.
Maybe because it was the greatest conflict in human history. I've had a fascination with WWII since I was a little kid. This alternate scenario is an interesting but frightening one.
It’s worse how USA takes the credit for the Soviets - who did 50% of the work in the war, D-day happened when Soviets were in Poland, although we can’t forget the British African campaign and the US-British lend-lease
@@socire72 exactly, according to Hollywood, the hard part started once the germen navy, air force and ground miliary were f**ked. so, once that happened the war started. And many Americans believe it, madness.
@@socire72It’s actually getting a lot better. The newer generations are giving the Soviets and Brits their due credit. Majority of those who claim the US won the war are either dead or are 60+ years old.
21:55 - 22:36 is exactly why i have so much respect for The Few. I know that one long battle was pivotal in the war, the first time anyone had defeated the nazis and the significance could have ended up with this video becoming a history documentary and not a speculative insight to what might have been. As a disabled person i know Aktion T4 would have been expanded and i wouldnt be here had this all happened.
something to note is that if Great Britain actually fell to the Nazi's the royal family's plan would have them flee to Canada, if push came to shove with the Nazi's I could also see Canada just joining the USA in this "New World vs Old World" scenario. could you imagine the Queen being an American citizen she would have technically reinstated herself as monarch of the United States
Looking back on history and constructing pausible "what-ifs" scenarios based in believable outcomes has got to be the single most interesting way to prevent it from repeating itself.
The word "Blitzkrieg" is an American invention. German leadership during WW2, never used the term. German military planners did use the term "Bewegungskrieg" which is similar, but not the same.
@@billakers5024 Maybe not to you. But to some, the truth always matters. But there are those who go out of their way to erase any truth that does not flatter them. The "Victors" write history to their express liking, and they expect to be worshipped as the "Saviors of the World" for all perpetuity.
There is a myth that Australia supported the Europe First strategy because it declared war on Germany straight away. Australia's focus was always on Japan even in 1940 when the AIF was committed to North Africa in return for an undertaking from Churchill to properly defend Singapore. Churchill threw in a promise of direct assistance if Japan ever threatened as well. Churchill's support of Europe First instead of Empire First in 1942 represented a repudiation of the system of Imperial defence that the British had established prior to 1914 and under which Australia had sent hundreds of thousands to the other side of the world to support Britain in two world wars. The failure of Imperial defence along with the fall of Singapore came as a complete surprise to the Australian government at the time.
I do enjoy these "what if" videos, but the facts are that he would have died shortly after winning from natural causes. He was not a healthy man, and his generals/advisors did not agree with much of what he did. "His plans" would have been thrown out for his successors and there could have been internal conflict amongst the generals for who should lead.
Most likely Himler would have succeeded him as head of state, and equally vile and ruthless individual. Although yes it is also very possible there would have been a massive internal struggle for power that may have very well toppled their empire before it could really get going.
@@KC-nn5wc that's nice, but I learned what I know from my dad who is a history professor. I doubt you have any qualifications for academic argument based on your school playground reply.
"It's when fascism wins in the USA, when fear, bitterness, anger and stupidity push people to poles to tick the box under American fascist party" It feels prophetic.
@@waynejohanson1083 Poland was forced to switch to communism, and agreement was to take down Germany. Allies did not want to continue WW2 with communism.
I understand the desire to simplify the scenario into one video. It makes a large assumption that Japan and Germany would be close allies, which they weren’t. If USSR is knocked out, there is a high risk of conflict between Germany and japan, not to mention all of China which isn’t even mentioned here (among many other areas of the world.)
Yeah, there were a lot of things wrong with this video. And yeah the Japanese didn't even like the Germans that much. They refused to declare war on Russis to help Germany, even though Germany declared war on America to help Japan. If the Nazis had somehow conquered all of Russia like this video assumes, they would definitely come into conflict with Japanese interests in Manchuria and Sibera.
@@yoloswaggins7121 of course Germany declares war on the US, the US declared war on Germany and had already been sending merchant ships to Great Britain long before Pearl Harbor. Which German U boats had been sinking like crazy.
"Moving all those men and machines across the ocean seems like a Hurculean task." Meanwhile America IRL has several floating cities with fully functional airports parked across the ocean. Aircraft carriers are so metal. Lol.
It should be noted that at the time Germany had no aircraft carriers. Graf Zeppelin was proposed but stopped partway. Though i suppose if Britain fell then British expertise and experience in shipbuilding would change that
Given the relations, after taking control of Europe, l would have expected Germany to fist move on south America given the amount of support they already had in several countries and then stage several moves north to encroach on America while trying to negotiate deals with Canada for access or alliance and attempting to negotiate a false peace with the USA that would require them to stop their arms buildup. After a few years when Germany was far more secure and had built all the equipment it needed it would then take the USA, staging posts in the Caribbean and Mexico, possibly Canada as well. It would seem incredible foolish to just rush in straight away, they would need to secure their homefront first.
@@Jake12220 I really don’t think America would just let Germany move in on those countries so quickly. In my opinion if Britain would have fell Canada and the US would merge at least for awhile to help fight off any type of invasion in North America. Plus all of the colonies Britain owned might have a well declared independence and starting fighting Germany again. Who knows what would have really happened.
We didnt want to go to war because we were in the process of ending the Great Depression by FRD’s plans, but in a way going to war saved us from the war because more workers were needed again
FDR's new deal was a disaster. Did nothing to life us out of the Depression. It was Pure Socialism and Communism. So in other words we were not in the process of ending the great depression. I have no idea where you get that idea from.
@@waynejohanson1083 idek im just trying to sound smart cause we learning the start of ww2 rn and hitlers rise to power but yea it didnt do much but one thing it did was give americans hope for change ty for the reply
They didn't want to join the war because they were well aware of the horrors of ww1 and because at the time America had taken an isolationist approach, the public had no interest in fighting wars they didn't see as having anything to do with them. America very nearly stayed out of the war, it was a small group of politicians that were strongly pushing for it and because they stopped selling oil to Japan that caused pearl harbour and dragged them into it. A lot of people dont realise that pearl harbour was a direct consequence of America cutting vital supplies to Japan, Japan was faced with the choice of attack America or give up.
@@waynejohanson1083 A few New Deal programs were decent, but it was WAY too bloated and powerful in areas and also was either big boom or big bust. FDR did a poor job of handling certain aspects of economic recovery for sure. World War II saved our economy, and then Truman prevented another catastrophic collapse after the war by doing the GI bill and other programs. Problem is, he trusted Stalin too much and we paid the price (though FDR by comparison literally tried to be chums with him).
War was needed to spur the economy. FDR tried to implement his plan but failed in spurring the U.S. into it's "roaring twenties" state. What he did "succeed" at was bringing social security and more bureaucracy.
I love the fact the London eye is in the background of the German troops marching through our streets in the cartoon especially when it was opened in 1999 😅
In my opinion, that TNO (the new order) mod for Hearts of Iron is one of the better takes on an axis victory scenario. It’s more realistic and quite interesting. If you have never heard of it I suggest looking it up and watching this one video that covers the lore and state of the world in 1962 when the game starts
Britain in world war 2 was not a small island nation. It was the head of the British empire, the largest empire the world has ever seen and it was supported by allied nations overseas, such as Canada.
It was a huge gamble to secure the resources the germans needed for a long war. They thought the soviet union was a pushover. The whole thing was lost when they couldn't kick the soviets out of the war early. The entry of the US was the huge final nail in an already made coffin.
I like how imaginative this whole video is, it also implies that the Americas had only two countries, the then Canada loyal to the British Crown and the US. I wonder how the rest of the Americas would have reacted to Hitler's victory in Europe.
Places like Mexico, Venezuela, Cuba would allow/ request Germans support to wage war on the US. Mexico would have a vested interest in the American Southwest/ taking back ceded territory if possible and If Germans would even agree to such a deal (them likely considering the Mexicans as a mixed race country and therefore inferior to a degree), Argentina, Brazil, Chile, other more “aryanized” countries would undoubtedly accept German Support without a second thought and Germans would potentially export people, materials, and military resources to these lands which would either accept German Occupation or make easy deals to allow Germany to set up military operations within their country boundaries.
At the time of World War II, some dictators in South America are pretty fascist in their orientation, like Juan Peron of Argentina. They would be more like puppet states to Germany than they became after World War II ended.
Actually panzer means "armour" or "armoured" depending on the precise context. Eg: panzerkampfwagen literally means armoured fighting vehicle. But still panzer tank is unnecessary, as an unarmoured tank would just be a caterpillar tractor with a gun slapped on it.
@@the_once-and-future_king. although I do see tanks referred to as just “panzer”, it does appear that the word has different translations, either “armour” or “tank” or “armoured”.
It wasn't a evil spell... it was simply the promise of a stronger and better country to live and raise your kids... it was something politicians still promise today
Bruh the government and people with the U.S obviously covered up media makes people who do good or try to fix humanity look bad like Russia you don’t know the true intentions of Adolf lot to explain about the Jews and everything but don’t believe the history you were taught
At 12:35 If Britain fell, Canada would have become the new Britain as its government was planning a mass evacuation to Canada Crown and all. That and the fact that Canada eventually grew to having the world's third largest army, Germany would have eventually lost anyways.
Wow, interesting. You know that this is far from possible. But it makes you realize what was at stake. As a child I saw the WW2 graveyard in my home town. I wondered why so many people died. What happened there? Now I think I get it.
at 6:20, I feel civilian deaths on Germany's side should be mentioned too if any. Obviously they were the enemy, but I don't like statistics not capturing the full picture, especially if you're going to place them side by side.
Dont you just love these, "what ifs"? There was a movie about Napoleon not dying on Elba but installing a double there and returning to France. There were 2 titles, Monsier N, and The Emperors New Clothes (I think). Not only was it a delight in possibilities and creativity, it was beautifully filmed.
@@grandmalovesmebest napoleon didn’t die on Elba. He became emperor of Elba (under decisions of the 6th coalition ) and after a year he returned to the mainland and with an army of 1000, most soldiers coming to fight him joined him so the king of france that napoleon had been replaced with fled and napoleon took France. The 7th coalition then destroyed him for good and exiled him to st Helena where he could never return from.
Okay, I tuned out when you said the Poles got blitzed. They actually put up a very stiff reisistance and didn't retreat to Warsaw until the russians betrayed them, inflicting ludicrous losses on the germans when you account for their own military might. Don't get your opening facts wrong.
I’d like to imagine that throughout all of this, Switzerland is still sitting there in the middle of it all eating a nice bowl of popcorn
Sounds about right.
Because Switzerland have nothing to provide except greeneries and pretty girls
@@VicXKhalifa Cheese and chocolate?
@@hmpz36911 Take it positively bro I like Switzerland one of the sweetest country that's y it's peaceful
@@hmpz36911 it looks like you’re missing it Jen. Relax
Mad respect to the dude who went to an alternate universe to get all this information
stop yappin bud
These comments are so cringe
do you even know what cringe means? they arent cringe at all@@frogskinshoelace
Weird he came back leaving that paradise behind.
rdrr
This is pretty accurate but from history, empires that are too big, start to fall like dominoes after a while. There would be too much area to defend, resistance would come up everywhere, making it hard to control as well.
I thought of a resistance who succeeds but all died in doing so.
Possibly, but it depends. With modern 1940s+ technology, information can spread much faster than in the past, and dissidents and rebels can be dealt with before things get out of hand in your satellite states. By controlling the media, narratives, and exterminating your opposition; there's not much opportunity for resistance to grow to such a level that it can oppose a global authoritarian coalition. And there wouldn't be anything like a free internet for people to unite and create movements against the new world order. Geopolitically, the world only gets smaller and smaller as technology grows more powerful, and those who wield it would be able to see almost everything.
Also without opposing economic power blocs to balance out the power of such a global government, resistance movements would find it difficult to obtain funding, weapons, etc to get off the ground and gain the traction they need.
@@lloydzeroa.k.aforger6990 that would be extremely difficult, with so many countries it'd be almost impossible to take em all out...
I think that's true hitherto but I think that reading 1984 you see that Oceania was controlled through thought and technology and I think (know) there's an empire that's coming that will be controlled exactly like that.
Surprised the US hasn't split into at least three yet to be honest
“Hitler’s plan for the world”
**spends the entire video talking about Europe and USA**
I agree, there’s almost nothing on what would happen to Japan, Italy, the Middle East, and South America.
average american geography knowledge.
@@footballdesk4417 ... to an American
That is all that realy counted at the time.
@@rogerphelps9939 I am sure that would be the opinion of the people who lived in those areas. But they do not count as 'the world', and the video is titled 'Hitler's plans for the world if he won' which indicates that it was going to discuss the world. Perhaps it should have been titled 'Hitler's plans for Europe and the USA if he won'. I come from a small island about the size of England on the opposite side of the world from Europe and I actually know what Hitler's plans were for my island. Most people on my island do because locally it was big news when it was uncovered in ruins about the time of my childhood decades ago. I would have liked to have known what his concrete plans were for other parts of the world. Same with the other axis leaders. That would make for a great video.
this seems pretty accurate, but I think just like many great empires like Rome it would be hard to control all that land and there would be hundreds of rebellions at once most Likely
Agreed.
Pushin
AFRICA went through worse 🙄
That’s what the robot dogs are for.
True though if they made the world many puppet countrys it might last longer
My mom and dad lived during WW2 in the states. He worked in a big factory, she was a stay home wife taking care of the kids and house. I once asked her when did she finally hear all about of the death camps. She said not until the war was over did any of the information come out. A lot of the news about the war was heavily censored. They only heard basic bits and pieces the government allowed the public to know. From what I got from her, a lot of the general public was shocked later to find out what was going on and they had no clue…
Holocaust didn't exist til the 60s. Cut the bs.
@@Divineretribution7777 bro….
Maybe there wasn't any camps, maybe they were made up afterwards. After all, the winner writes the history 🤔
While my granddad was underground, transported jewelry across the ocean with his resistance comrades, my grandmom worked 3 jobs, took care of their family and home, paid the bills and did it all proudly. I don't know where you are from but your grandparents sounds rich compared to a lot of other occupation people.
They didn’t have the internet providing instantaneous news like they do now.
i love seeing these different interpretations because it makes me think what the circumstances would've been like, thanks for making videos like these :)
Ok and so
Well for one. Africa and France would be totally different right now
There's a novel called "The Man in the High Castle" by Philip K. Dick that's depicts this exact scenario. It's a quick read and seems like a fairly accurate snapshot to me.
There’s a show based off of that book as well. It’s super trippy to think about.
AFRICA went through worse 🙄
There's a show too.
@@africa1st737
"Africa went thru worse"
First off.. in what way??
Secondly, Africa is a continent. Not an individual country. That like someone saying "Asia had it worse".
Africa is a diverse and beautiful land. Its home to thousands of cultures and dozens of religions.
Finally.. Is it a competition to you ? Do you even know what the op is talking about?
@@africa1st737 tf does Africa gotta do w this 💀
One thing to keep in mind in this scenario - in real life, it was insane for Germany and Japan to go to war with the USA just on the basis of manufacturing capacity alone. In one year, each of the US’s “Big Three” car manufacturers on its own outproduced Germany, Japan and Italy combined. The US was also self-sufficient in oil as well as most of the other crucial raw materials too. Well-informed high-ranking military strategists in Germany and Japan were well aware of this situation but had to go along with war regardless.
There was a interesting comment after D day form a solider tasked with counting the horses (most army's still used horses for supplies), he wrote when I could not see a single horse on those beaches I knew the war was lost.
@@rascototalwar8618 In fact the British Army had few horses at all by 1940. The US army had NONE on overseas service.
It was only the boasting germans who had horse power.
Yeah but if they could’ve mass-produce there tiger tank or even the Panzer Mark IV they would’ve won the Tiger tank had like 15 Shermans to one tiger tank if you actually kept the tiger tanks up and number and actually working yet we wouldn’t have stood a chance it don’t matter how many people you got if you got over over 100 tiger tanks come in at ya and each one is worth 15 Sherman‘s but there wasn’t a mass production of the tiger tank which is One of the problems they had because it was too costly to produce and it was rushed low-key he could’ve won he was supposed to start the war in 1940 when he had like eight battleships two carriers 300 subs he only had half the amount of subs he needed in order to successfully take over the world but his arrogance and ignorance cost way he had wanted he had rushed it way too quickly
@@fischerswherethefunisright123 We would have just made new higher powered bazookas and anti tank weapons. our Shermans were infinitely customizable. you could fit a massive gun on a Sherman capable of defeating heavier sloped tank armor. first comment is so true though we outproduced ever nation in the world combined in nearly every resource. The germans even if they defeated all of europe would have to have at least negotiated with the US they would not have been able to defeat us soundly, if anything it would have been a cold war with Germany instead of Russia. once nuclear weapons enter the scene it's cold war because nobody wants to get hit once.
@@fischerswherethefunisright123 The Tiger Tank and Panzer were inferior, not because they weren't good. They were. They took too long to make, too long to train people, and were way too expensive. The US could make about 10 Sherman tanks for one Tiger. Not only that the Sherman was designed to be taken for parts from other tanks. It was modular system. Even production facilities for them could be easily setup overseas. In fact the US was planning to start production of war supplies in France and the UK. They already setup some in the UK in about 6 months. The Germans were already moving away from their classic designs btw once they realized in a prolong modern war with shortages having really expensive and long production times for weapons were about as realistic as building Huge Battleships that take 15 years to make.
In this timeline Kanye is one of the top German rappers in the game. His hits include "Neindigger", "NSDAP", and Black Skinhead.
Too bad he actually is a Black person, and the Nazis would have likely exterminated them as well.
Lol
L comment
@@BodakBris66 average brainless 15yo kanye defender
N*ggas in Berlin
Japan likely wouldn’t have invaded the Soviet Union only because they genuinely wanted to knock the U.S. out of the war. All Japan would have to do is keep the impression up that they would invade the Soviet Union to tie up Soviet troops in the Far East. This would’ve given the Germans an easier road to Moscow in 1941 because in actual history Moscow was saved by far eastern reserves. Even if Moscow falls in 1941 the Germans would still need to launch a southern offensive to take Russian oil as lack of oil was the biggest problem facing the Germans. Also we shouldn’t assume the fall Moscow is the end of the Soviet Union. Stalin almost certainly would’ve fought on. Moscow is a symbolic loss but likely not a enough to win the war for Germany
yeahhh generally when wars happen and important cities are taken it doesnt immediately mean it's the end of the country but well the most important city's gone that's a problem. gotta get that back then. Like Paris. Japan did it w/ China once, too.
Long comment!
Stalin himself said he would stay in Moscow and fight until the end. Therefore, taking Moscow would have shatterred Soviet even though it wouldnt have finished Soviet right away.
Japan was using up the majority of their resources and manpower fighting China at the time, which was a very costly war for them. They probably wouldn't have been able to invade the Soviet Union anyway.
Japan broke the Alliance with China. They were suppose to be allies in anti-comintern pact to fight Soviet Union.
I love your use of this style of art, very entertaining and informing at the same time!
He probably was gonna decimate all art schools
That would be weird, considering he was a painter himself.
If he decimates modern art then I support him
@@Durzo1259 because he got kicked out of an art school
Fascists typically don't like art, books, and education..really makes you think
@Cardboard Cape just kidding. I always supported him. o/
Thanks for mentioning contribution of 2.5 million indian soldiers in WW2 , many historians very often overlook it.
Besides WW2 expenses of great britain was funded by India and other colonies..
You also very well mentioned double standard of western nations for anti-semitism and racism...
I think the issue is not so much overlooked as much as everyone is lumped in under "Britain." But that's merely a convenient header, the British themselves tend to be aware of the vast contributions made by you, the Australians, Canadians and many other countries. It's acknowledged in our Remembrance and in our War Cemetaries and is a core part of the Commonwealth.
We did not do right by India in so many ways, but when it really came down to the wire you put all that aside for the greater good. Please know it is acknowledged, appreciated and the huge boost we received from countries unimaginably far away helped us through the years of attrition (my mother was a child in WW2, her father fought in WW1.) We felt pretty lonely in Europe, all of you held us up. So thank you.
@@randomhumanoidblob4506 great words, hope we can make a better world now and learn from past mistakes ..
👍👍👏👏🙏🙏
I'll second that! I hope humanity can learn to look past our differences because we all have so much more in common. I'd much rather celebrate that than fight anybody 🤗 Keep well, my friend.
What about South Africa?
The war was some where around 94% white against white soldiers.
It took 27 minutes to describe Wolfenstein, lol.
Love that game
Sounds like a pretty good future I don’t mind learning German
Lol
Old but gold
Well maybe except the crazy futuristic stuff that Germany had haha
One of the best game series ever! Minus a couple of games haha my favorite it return to castle wolfenstein! A true gem to this day.
But Canada wasn't a dominion of the British empire by then. They got independence in 1931. It's why Canada was free to declare war on Germany for itself in WW2 (which it did)
Canada is still technically part of united kingdom
@@billakers5024No it’s not…they become completely independent in 1982…research gets you far.
@@josh05683then why do canadians moan about uk queen.
@@billakers5024
You're talking about the Commonwealth, a federation of nations. Canada isn't under the leadership of UK.
@@billakers5024yep. Even though we technically are our own country since the 80’s we are still partly a constitutional monarchy
27 minutes of The Infographics Show, epic!
I didint realize before I read this coment
I mean this ain’t tik toxic no clue why they don’t do hour long videos
I watched videos like this or longer and sometimes u get so focused on the vid that it feels like 10m and not a hour
Longer than the lifespan of 85% of every organism from every species which has ever existed over the past Billion years of evolution :o
Canada gained independence after the First World War and it wasn’t technically a dominion of Britain so it wouldn’t have fallen at the same time as Britain, there is the possibility that Canada would have surrendered but I feel like that would be a last resort.
YES THANK YOU. also true.
They’d probably just join up with the U.S, don’t forget Canada declared war on Japan before the U.S did after Pearl Harbor and they took a beach at Normandy. Canada were true brothers during WW2
@@TylerA9981 tru
Queen elizabeth is still your head of state, whatever she says is law even now xD
@@Elbereth_TV no she isnt. she can recommend things at most. canada completely separated from britain in 1981
As a British dominion, Australia declared war in line with the UK on September 3rd, 1939. Early involvements included Australian pilots in the Battle of Britain and Australian divisions fighting in North Africa- most notably, the ‘Rats of Tobruk’.
Thanks for the upload!
Philosophically its important to understand why the communists and nazis were so vehemently against each other. They are often categorized as "right" and "left" but they had a common mission: reaching the predestined end of human history. The communists believed the system was oppressive and had to be torn down and replaced; the nazis believed structures were how you got there, but you had to get rid of the weaklings holding it back. It was either about championing the underdog concept or the overdog concept. They were fighting over what they thought was the same prize but they thought the other side was the absolute opposite way, thats why so many atrocities were thought were necessary: they believe human history was progressing to a predetermined point, and that they had to be on the right side of it.
A lot of people overlook philosophy and the Nazis. Thank you for highlighting this. Straw Dogs by John Gray describes the basics of this
I always just thought of them as Godless heathens with little thought of how they got to be who they were. It’s a lot like putting up a mile long fence. If your second post is just 1/4 inch off center by the time you get to the end of that mile you have missed the target by a lot.
Wild
Well said!
The most overlooked thing is that people still conceive them as right and left. They're both socialists. They're both left.
"Which made his father to punish him severly"
Thank you for this reference, that has to be one of my favorite History Channels
XD
go dat reference
Looking back on history and constructing pausible "what-ifs" scenarios based in believable outcomes has got to be the single most interesting way to prevent it from repeating itself. Next time humanity faces a scenario this bleak, it will be much harder to prevent it from ending up this way.
Kinda like what is happening now, by those who hold all money??
we will win the next time
its repeating itself now in America.
Isnt this happening now with russia and Ukraine
@Chiefs Life there is no way he will g
Answer for war crimes after this envassion is over or bend over to these sanctions he will be out for blood
Canada wasn’t a dominion of the British Empire in WW2. WW2 was Canada’s first war as a free state
Finally a fellow Canadian who knows history
But Canada still has its colonial flag during d-day so technically still a Colony till they invented there and own flag
@@gavinponatoski5798 sooooo let me get this straight... in your opinion a country is considered independent only when they have their own flag. does that mean that america only became independent in june 14 1977 since thats when they commissioned their official flag? because if so, mate yall celebrating ur independence on the wrong day.
@@joelschelp5662 Canada soldiers at D-Day was commanded by British Bernard montgomerry
@@joelschelp5662 Lol America hasn't been independent since at least 1913
It’s so impressive what the RAF did in WWII and the Battle of Britain
It wasn't just the RAF but also I believe was army radar teams. They combined made the battle winnable.
It was Polish pilots that saved Britain. Britain ran out of its own pilots
@@ForgetReligion3179 1 in 5 RAF were non British.
@@van_lichenstein8171 Well they swore allegiance to our king they might aswell have been British since their identity was wiped out by the germans
@@ForgetReligion3179 That is simply not true
“Not many people believed this small island nation could hold its own.”
That’s nonsense. Britain had its massive empire behind it and was not alone.
But those were facts. It's not the same to have your endless food-producing fields, your enormous-demanding resources and your labour forces in your backyard (like the US and the USSR) than thousands of kilometres overseas. And against the most advanced military force in the world at that time.
I read a lot about WW2 and am still amazes me how British managed not only to prevent nazis to land and conquer Britain, but to organize themselves to continue daily life in the middle of a war. And without Churchill, the outcome would surely have been different.
The video is full of problems. It’s about a 2/10 on historical understanding. The problem is it’s so wrong and clings to a simplified, baseline historical narrative that people often get exposed to in public schools, that correcting the mistaken info people get from it is close to impossible.
England was easy pickings since it was an island. Germany simply could have starved them out. England has limited resources and relies on the countries it conquered to supply they with oil and food. Germany ran out of oil itself, and extended itself beyond its capacity. Had they not done this they would have won.
@@appletile2887 Germany did try to starve the UK but couldn't best the Royal Navy, or Royal Air force.
All were exploding in civil wars
The infographics show is just amazing
Everything is simplified and is understandable in an interesting way
The similarities between nazis and american democrats can not be coincidence
@@That.Guy. It's not bud. The dems have been doing the same thing since their founding. They just changed targets. Burning, looting, donning hoods, taking advantage of social issues, creating problems to fix? Using smear tactics? They will say anything to anyone to retain power. They actually already have...
We didn't defeat the Nazis. We became them.
If only it were somewhat accurate
That's how propaganda works
bro they're the wokest people I have ever seen 🤣keep watching and believing everything they say if you wanna get brainwashed further
Cartoon Graffics have improved bro, well done 💯👌
Is a team
I think the war could have ended this way with just 1 or 2 changes. The first atomic bombs appeared just a few years later - imagine if the Germans had access to those in 1938 - but that's only 7 years before they were actually used. Jet engines are a similar story - arriving just at the end of the conflict, too late to have any impact. I imagine if just a few engineers and scientists had made different decisions the entire story could have been very different. The Germans had the V2 - imagine that with an atomic warhead. Doesn't bare thinking about, really.
Lunchables at the time, weren’t interest in giving Germany nuclear weapons yet.
Good "what-if" analysis. The Germans were closer, theoretically, to the hydrogen bomb, than the US was. However, the Germans didn't have the resources to execute atomic bomb development.
Yeah, it really puts into perspective how war scientists/engineers are by far the greatest threat to the world. I have no respect for any of them.
Well thank got in the end, they were bombed into total submission. Never to even come close to winning. He died a loser and a coward.
@@heavyassaultmode1503 there's a really amazing story of a couple of Norwegian commandos sinking a ferry containing Germany's entire stock (at the time) of heavy water. That set them back quite a While as it's slow and painstaking to produce
This just shows how such a small island (United kingdom ) was able to stop so much from happening and just one battle could have changed everything
9th largest in the world
They got varried by USA and USSR
U mean Jews not england
yes back then maybe but so much division and people who are not interested in their fellow people anymore sadly i don’t think we would have the same outcome
my dad was in the raf during the war as a navigator on the lancasters its a shame that they have spoken (as they should) highly of the battle of britain but the raf were seen as an embarrassment yet they were pivotal in winning the war for the uk
@@generaldoomer2455 please tell me you're joking
“History is written by the victors”
Pretty sure it's written by historians.
@@cerdic6305 I like how you “liked” your own comment! 👍
@@cerdic6305 and the information the “historians” get is from the victors
@@mogenvonbogel7342 Not really. Historians try to find the truth of historical events as far as they possibly can, having the accounts of both sides in a conflict allows them to cross reference and come to better conclusions.
What a useless comment in context of this film
Thanks for the video I really enjoyed it.
Australia joined the war the day Britain declared war- as did every country in the Commonwealth. Took a while for our troops to get there because we are Geographically a long way away.
you guys still haven't gained your independence?
@@thebestofallworlds187 most of the populace doesnt want nor feel the need to; the monarchy is symbolic at this point
Finally! A video about Klaus Schwab 😃
Hah, I get it
You say that, but Schwab definitely would have been executed by the regime if the Axis powers had won
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼😎
You guys have such weird conspiracy theories
@@ElectronFieldPulse Funny you say conspiracy when its not that difficult to connect the dots.
there's a mistake in the graphic at 2:40 see, it has the danish peninsula of Jylland (Justland) and the island of Fyn (Funen) marked as occupied, but the island Sjælland (Zealand) is not red. I assume this is because the artist who made the graphic assumed that island to be part of Sweden, but the reality is that Sjælland is home to our capital city of Copenhagen
Everyone should simply use this comment to judge the accuracy of the entire video and be done with this drivel.
🇩🇰🇩🇰🇩🇰
I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜I LOVE LEAN 💜💜💜💜💜💜
🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
I am from New Sjaelland
don’t let Kanye see this
It's worth noting that Russia managed to hold off the German invasion for the first year only thanks to British and American intervention. The British sent over 5000 tanks and 7000 aircraft, and the Americans over 13000 tanks and 14000 aircraft. In total, the allies sent the soviets nearly 1$ trillion worth of aid (adjusted for inflation). For comparison, by 1942, the Germans only had produced 5500 tanks in total.
If the British were working for the Nazis and the Americans would remain neutral, the Soviet Union would have collapsed.
Puts things in perspective, yes?
The Soviet Union had a stronger military than the Germans from the beggining. Even if the Americans and British didn't intervene the USSR would still defeat Germany.
Nah they would have still won it would have just been harder the Germans were undersuplied and the soviets had a stronger millatary to begin with
@@somerandomdude827 exactly
The Soviet Union still collapsed decades later so guess that intervention was meaningless.
If WW2 history is your thing then Dover on the south east coast of UK is a great visit. Dover castle, Spitfire museum and the RAF Memorial are all great places to visit.
The Man In the High Castle explores what life might have been like had Japan and Germany successfully invaded America. It’s a half decent series but you have to suspend your disbelief quite massively at times.
Try the book
History is always written by the victor...
And the eggs are never fried by the chickens
Yes, as evidenced by the fact that no Jews write about WWII.
@@DG-iw3yw what does this mean? (Genuinely asking)
@@jobeergamingtv8962 winner winner chicken dinner
@@jobeergamingtv8962 I think it means like the chickens that create and lay the eggs aren’t the ones to present them because of humans(victors: the ones making profit by presenting/frying eggs), and are see as the producers. Put that into Historical terms, History is always written by the victor, because in general the defeated don’t always explain it from their side of the story, could be disagreed BECAUSE of the blame they took from the history or wtv.
The infographics seems to be really interested in WWII topics these days! But I love these videos
Maybe because it was the greatest conflict in human history. I've had a fascination with WWII since I was a little kid. This alternate scenario is an interesting but frightening one.
gotta do their best to counter the rising numbers of "holocaust deniers"
The Man in the High Castle is a book based on this exact situation. Amazon Prime also adapted a TV show around it. It's extremely intriguing.
What's the show called?
@@doinyamomm4 Dude. It’s called The Man In The High Castle.
@懐かしい | Natsukashii dude
Insane quality this Video! Awesome!
Thank you for given the British credit ❤ often I hear Americans taking all the claim, which annoys Brits as you can imagine
The Americans saved Britain. Without them, you would be speaking German!!!
It’s worse how USA takes the credit for the Soviets - who did 50% of the work in the war, D-day happened when Soviets were in Poland, although we can’t forget the British African campaign and the US-British lend-lease
@@socire72 exactly, according to Hollywood, the hard part started once the germen navy, air force and ground miliary were f**ked. so, once that happened the war started. And many Americans believe it, madness.
@@socire72It’s actually getting a lot better. The newer generations are giving the Soviets and Brits their due credit. Majority of those who claim the US won the war are either dead or are 60+ years old.
@@socire72they got it to the goal line but we scored the touchdown lol
This is definitely one of your better what-if scenario videos.
21:55 - 22:36 is exactly why i have so much respect for The Few. I know that one long battle was pivotal in the war, the first time anyone had defeated the nazis and the significance could have ended up with this video becoming a history documentary and not a speculative insight to what might have been. As a disabled person i know Aktion T4 would have been expanded and i wouldnt be here had this all happened.
Another great video! So glad that this version of history never came to pass. 👍
Me too sir!! People do not know now how close they came to doing this!!!! Most do not appreciate our Grandparents saved the world!
😁
👍🏾
I’d easily take speaking German for a better society than the one we have now
@@cloudymccloud6254 Agreed
Sounds like a great plan, imagine getting rid of all usury, no eternal dependence on debt of a flawed financial system or ponzi scheme
Yeah great for everyone except 1 group. Germany’s economic historic rise is a microcosm of what happens when you remove their influence.
But they’ve been subverting our civilizations since the beginning of time. The number is 109 for a reason and it’s not racism.
If there's a multiverse we're looking at one of a number of realities
No, we are looking at very different universes here
That universe is heaven!!!😍
Really enjoyed this,but seriously UKGB was not just a little island country .
The empire was effing huge.
Loved it.
Even if Great Britain fail there’s no way the United States would let Germany take Canada.
The US had a Canadian invasion plan for that scenario.
something to note is that if Great Britain actually fell to the Nazi's the royal family's plan would have them flee to Canada, if push came to shove with the Nazi's I could also see Canada just joining the USA in this "New World vs Old World" scenario.
could you imagine the Queen being an American citizen she would have technically reinstated herself as monarch of the United States
Dont worry about - the uk smashed the mm back to Germany while the rest of Europe lost. Your welcome
Germany wouldnt ask USA what would they let and what they wouldnt let amigo 😅
@@nordskyrim6312 Germany dont even have nukes - a fairer fight is uk and USA tbh
"Austrian Painter!"
1932: 😊
1933: 💀
Looking back on history and constructing pausible "what-ifs" scenarios based in believable outcomes has got to be the single most interesting way to prevent it from repeating itself.
Keep up the great work! Love your videos.
My history class actually watched this video. We love how clear and understandable this channel is
@G my English teacher made us watch lord of the rings.
The word "Blitzkrieg" is an American invention. German leadership during WW2, never used the term. German military planners did use the term "Bewegungskrieg" which is similar, but not the same.
Does it matter tho?
@@billakers5024 Maybe not to you. But to some, the truth always matters. But there are those who go out of their way to erase any truth that does not flatter them. The "Victors" write history to their express liking, and they expect to be worshipped as the "Saviors of the World" for all perpetuity.
@@henrikrolfsen584 American Germans are the worse........
It didn't even take that to win the war. We dropped the sun then made a song about it. Only two times. Never again.
@@jsdowling1989 the sun will soon be dropped on usa
There is a myth that Australia supported the Europe First strategy because it declared war on Germany straight away. Australia's focus was always on Japan even in 1940 when the AIF was committed to North Africa in return for an undertaking from Churchill to properly defend Singapore. Churchill threw in a promise of direct assistance if Japan ever threatened as well.
Churchill's support of Europe First instead of Empire First in 1942 represented a repudiation of the system of Imperial defence that the British had established prior to 1914 and under which Australia had sent hundreds of thousands to the other side of the world to support Britain in two world wars. The failure of Imperial defence along with the fall of Singapore came as a complete surprise to the Australian government at the time.
I do enjoy these "what if" videos, but the facts are that he would have died shortly after winning from natural causes. He was not a healthy man, and his generals/advisors did not agree with much of what he did. "His plans" would have been thrown out for his successors and there could have been internal conflict amongst the generals for who should lead.
Most likely Himler would have succeeded him as head of state, and equally vile and ruthless individual. Although yes it is also very possible there would have been a massive internal struggle for power that may have very well toppled their empire before it could really get going.
Both know nothing
@@KC-nn5wc that's nice, but I learned what I know from my dad who is a history professor. I doubt you have any qualifications for academic argument based on your school playground reply.
Many historians suspect he had Parkinson's.
"It's when fascism wins in the USA, when fear, bitterness, anger and stupidity push people to poles to tick the box under American fascist party" It feels prophetic.
Totally
And deep
Based
Need more antifa. The anti fascist, fascists.
2016 in a nutshell.
History is written by the Victorious.
You forgot that the USSR/Russia also invaded Poland from the west
...you mean east, right? germany is to the west.
Ture. They invaded Poland too yet the west did not declare war on them, just Germany. I wonder why that is.
@@waynejohanson1083 Poland was forced to switch to communism, and agreement was to take down Germany. Allies did not want to continue WW2 with communism.
@@waynejohanson1083 we needed Russia.
@@grandmalovesmebest Judea declared war on Germany in 1933.
You forgot the inspiring quote by Winston
"When Napoleon led buloingreyawibifatlodenburg, and his grand army"
I understand the desire to simplify the scenario into one video. It makes a large assumption that Japan and Germany would be close allies, which they weren’t. If USSR is knocked out, there is a high risk of conflict between Germany and japan, not to mention all of China which isn’t even mentioned here (among many other areas of the world.)
40% china was under japanese rule at that time
We should have been allied with Germany
@@punkndisorderly7691 🤨
Yeah, there were a lot of things wrong with this video.
And yeah the Japanese didn't even like the Germans that much. They refused to declare war on Russis to help Germany, even though Germany declared war on America to help Japan.
If the Nazis had somehow conquered all of Russia like this video assumes, they would definitely come into conflict with Japanese interests in Manchuria and Sibera.
@@yoloswaggins7121 of course Germany declares war on the US, the US declared war on Germany and had already been sending merchant ships to Great Britain long before Pearl Harbor. Which German U boats had been sinking like crazy.
The Norwegians did one of the most important missions in the war by destroying the heavy water in Rjukan, could you make a video on that
"Moving all those men and machines across the ocean seems like a Hurculean task."
Meanwhile America IRL has several floating cities with fully functional airports parked across the ocean.
Aircraft carriers are so metal. Lol.
A lot of it has been built slowly over time with mobilization being a key feature of it. Hard to mobilize quickly for an invasion by comparison.
It should be noted that at the time Germany had no aircraft carriers. Graf Zeppelin was proposed but stopped partway. Though i suppose if Britain fell then British expertise and experience in shipbuilding would change that
Given the relations, after taking control of Europe, l would have expected Germany to fist move on south America given the amount of support they already had in several countries and then stage several moves north to encroach on America while trying to negotiate deals with Canada for access or alliance and attempting to negotiate a false peace with the USA that would require them to stop their arms buildup. After a few years when Germany was far more secure and had built all the equipment it needed it would then take the USA, staging posts in the Caribbean and Mexico, possibly Canada as well. It would seem incredible foolish to just rush in straight away, they would need to secure their homefront first.
@@Jake12220 I really don’t think America would just let Germany move in on those countries so quickly. In my opinion if Britain would have fell Canada and the US would merge at least for awhile to help fight off any type of invasion in North America. Plus all of the colonies Britain owned might have a well declared independence and starting fighting Germany again. Who knows what would have really happened.
We didnt want to go to war because we were in the process of ending the Great Depression by FRD’s plans, but in a way going to war saved us from the war because more workers were needed again
FDR's new deal was a disaster. Did nothing to life us out of the Depression. It was Pure Socialism and Communism. So in other words we were not in the process of ending the great depression. I have no idea where you get that idea from.
@@waynejohanson1083 idek im just trying to sound smart cause we learning the start of ww2 rn and hitlers rise to power but yea it didnt do much but one thing it did was give americans hope for change ty for the reply
They didn't want to join the war because they were well aware of the horrors of ww1 and because at the time America had taken an isolationist approach, the public had no interest in fighting wars they didn't see as having anything to do with them.
America very nearly stayed out of the war, it was a small group of politicians that were strongly pushing for it and because they stopped selling oil to Japan that caused pearl harbour and dragged them into it. A lot of people dont realise that pearl harbour was a direct consequence of America cutting vital supplies to Japan, Japan was faced with the choice of attack America or give up.
@@waynejohanson1083 A few New Deal programs were decent, but it was WAY too bloated and powerful in areas and also was either big boom or big bust. FDR did a poor job of handling certain aspects of economic recovery for sure. World War II saved our economy, and then Truman prevented another catastrophic collapse after the war by doing the GI bill and other programs. Problem is, he trusted Stalin too much and we paid the price (though FDR by comparison literally tried to be chums with him).
War was needed to spur the economy. FDR tried to implement his plan but failed in spurring the U.S. into it's "roaring twenties" state. What he did "succeed" at was bringing social security and more bureaucracy.
well this is a ironic time to get recommend this after all the stuff with Ye
No it aint
Nothing is coincidence. AI HAS TAKEN OVER
Everything to try to control your thoughts and opinions
@@BodakBris66 11:55
I've concluded that most people simply have no idea what "ironic" actually means.
I love the fact the London eye is in the background of the German troops marching through our streets in the cartoon especially when it was opened in 1999 😅
I gotta say, this is probably the BEST one yet! It was almost like watching a movie!
In my opinion, that TNO (the new order) mod for Hearts of Iron is one of the better takes on an axis victory scenario. It’s more realistic and quite interesting. If you have never heard of it I suggest looking it up and watching this one video that covers the lore and state of the world in 1962 when the game starts
can you link the vid?
Taboritsky gang
Wolfenstein will be a better fit.
The brainrot is spreading
@@markarca6360 not really it's very unrealistic
The reason why The Allies won in WWII is because of American muscle, British brains, and Soviet blood
Don't forget while being supplimented by French Resistance cunning, Commonwealth grit, and Chinese sacrifice.
and all partisans colonies
Yeah basically
And we're paying the price for it now.
@@twilliam043 Elaborate.
Britain in world war 2 was not a small island nation. It was the head of the British empire, the largest empire the world has ever seen and it was supported by allied nations overseas, such as Canada.
Love your videos, What’s missing in this scenario is that hitlers health was declining near the end of the war.
Probably due to the stress of impending doom
Never had the resources to pull it off. The single moment he invaded USSR, he was spread too thin. And fighting the US was pure lunacy.
It was a huge gamble to secure the resources the germans needed for a long war. They thought the soviet union was a pushover. The whole thing was lost when they couldn't kick the soviets out of the war early. The entry of the US was the huge final nail in an already made coffin.
Self confidence is good but in this situation not so muxh
I like how imaginative this whole video is, it also implies that the Americas had only two countries, the then Canada loyal to the British Crown and the US. I wonder how the rest of the Americas would have reacted to Hitler's victory in Europe.
Rest of countries doesn't matter
Places like Mexico, Venezuela, Cuba would allow/ request Germans support to wage war on the US. Mexico would have a vested interest in the American Southwest/ taking back ceded territory if possible and If Germans would even agree to such a deal (them likely considering the Mexicans as a mixed race country and therefore inferior to a degree), Argentina, Brazil, Chile, other more “aryanized” countries would undoubtedly accept German Support without a second thought and Germans would potentially export people, materials, and military resources to these lands which would either accept German Occupation or make easy deals to allow Germany to set up military operations within their country boundaries.
At the time of World War II, some dictators in South America are pretty fascist in their orientation, like Juan Peron of Argentina. They would be more like puppet states to Germany than they became after World War II ended.
@Michelle I mow my own lawn!
It's like asking African what would they do. The answer is nothing
After all the commercials I’ve had to sit through, I’ll never watch another one of these videos again! Keep up the great work! 😂
exactly
U had the problem also? Like a commercial every minute
RUclips Premium is worth every penny.
@@jonelfilipek7848 exactly
14:57 he literally had the real life death note 💀
I love how he says “panzer tanks” when “panzer” translates to tank in English.
Tank tanks
It sounds cooler when we say panzer
Actually panzer means "armour" or "armoured" depending on the precise context. Eg: panzerkampfwagen literally means armoured fighting vehicle. But still panzer tank is unnecessary, as an unarmoured tank would just be a caterpillar tractor with a gun slapped on it.
@@the_once-and-future_king. ooh I didn’t know that. Thanks for sharing man
@@the_once-and-future_king. although I do see tanks referred to as just “panzer”, it does appear that the word has different translations, either “armour” or “tank” or “armoured”.
These videos are very well put together
It wasn't a evil spell... it was simply the promise of a stronger and better country to live and raise your kids... it was something politicians still promise today
Provable. So I wonder why they painted him as the most evil man? 🧐
@@Nicholasjkonyha Because...because of the Genocide.
if you like alternative history pretty similar to this, I recommend to read or watch The Man in the High Castle
where?
@@anthonyfoutch3152 it's on Prime
Bruh the government and people with the U.S obviously covered up media makes people who do good or try to fix humanity look bad like Russia you don’t know the true intentions of Adolf lot to explain about the Jews and everything but don’t believe the history you were taught
where?
@@gabedadog4371 prime
You should do a video discussing if WW2 ended in a stalemate.
Wow. That would have been almost as bad as the dystopian nightmare that actually did happen.
"What is history but fables that are agreed upon."
-Napoleon Bonaparte
Art school entrance exams would be incredibly strict
At 12:35 If Britain fell, Canada would have become the new Britain as its government was planning a mass evacuation to Canada Crown and all. That and the fact that Canada eventually grew to having the world's third largest army, Germany would have eventually lost anyways.
everyone commenting on this video: "And this is why I don't support my rival political party."
Great stuff. There's a huge amount of 'what if' things that would have needed to happen, but interesting to theorise. 👍
Wow, interesting. You know that this is far from possible. But it makes you realize what was at stake. As a child I saw the WW2 graveyard in my home town. I wondered why so many people died. What happened there? Now I think I get it.
at 6:20, I feel civilian deaths on Germany's side should be mentioned too if any. Obviously they were the enemy, but I don't like statistics not capturing the full picture, especially if you're going to place them side by side.
they were not the ones being bombed in their homeland
@@josephbrown1249 yeah I didn’t realize that was just a single battle.
@@josephbrown1249 yes they were
In my country (india) uk empire killed almost million people
Imagine Volkswagen beetles everywhere
Very entertaining! An absolutely impossible scenario but fun to think about.
Dont you just love these, "what ifs"? There was a movie about Napoleon not dying on Elba but installing a double there and returning to France. There were 2 titles, Monsier N, and The Emperors New Clothes (I think). Not only was it a delight in possibilities and creativity, it was beautifully filmed.
@@grandmalovesmebest napoleon didn’t die on Elba. He became emperor of Elba (under decisions of the 6th coalition ) and after a year he returned to the mainland and with an army of 1000, most soldiers coming to fight him joined him so the king of france that napoleon had been replaced with fled and napoleon took France. The 7th coalition then destroyed him for good and exiled him to st Helena where he could never return from.
@@grandmalovesmebest (and he died there on st Helena)
Love your videos. What’s missing in the scenario is hitlers health declining near the end of the war.
Yeah but that was mainly due to drugs/exhaustion/stress. It is disputed, so don't take my word for it, but most likely.
"Oversimplified..." Yeah...by a LOT.
These are all really great & informative videos. Bravo !
If Germany won the war, man would've been on Mars in the 80's.
no
@@starcalz1958 yes
@@danieldeluna9661 Absolutely not. Had the Nazis won, technology would have developed more slowly.
3:48 'take over his empire'. Churchill didnt have an empire, he was a civil servant.
This could’ve all been avoided if Churchill hadn’t cracked that G.I. Jane joke about Eva!
You’re funny
Ha ha
Hahahah
There’s so many books about this. My favorite one is called “the only thing to fear”
Okay, I tuned out when you said the Poles got blitzed. They actually put up a very stiff reisistance and didn't retreat to Warsaw until the russians betrayed them, inflicting ludicrous losses on the germans when you account for their own military might. Don't get your opening facts wrong.