The saying in engineering goes: If you can't make it precise, make it adjustable. This video gives you a great insight into why there are so many parts in mass production that allow for adjustment. Assembling 100 parts on a wide tolerance margin and then turning some set screws to get everything to fit together properly makes a huge difference in cost. Great video!
I ran across your video by chance, and I enjoyed the demo... however, as a former CNC machinist/programmer I saw a few things during the machining process that could have sped up your process, as well as created a perfect bore through the part without having the chance of a mismatch. When working with aluminum, don't be afraid to hog out more material during roughing at a higher feedrate... it's the best material to machine (metal-wise) and rip through without loading your spindle torque and tool deflection. Many times you can cut your cycle time in half by bumping up the D.O.C. along with a slight increase in feedrate and it will throw a better chip (both drilling and milling). Also, if you have access to a boring head, I'd suggest utilizing it to finish your thru bore if it requires tighter tolerances on diameter and concentricity... it will give you a consistent microfinish while holding your tight tolerances and it only takes 1 operation to finish. It also gives you the option to use an arbor fixture for securing the part while finishing the outer profile. Just some tips from an old machinist and a new subscriber!
@@eatablellama6581 Grinding, yes. Down to a couple of tenths. Pretty much the only material we used (gas turbines). Not a big deal for someone that knows their way around a finish grinder. Ran a multi-axis CNC Bryant, Brown & Sharp, I.D, O.D, you name it. Fun times at Pratt & Whitney, Lycoming, Sikorsky Aircraft and Honeywell. I miss it :-(
@@nerfburger1511 well just know some folks in this world, like me for example, really appreciate what people like you do. Innovators, inventors, and people who make things.
33 years as a manufacturing engineer in Aerospace......and I can only dream of design engineers understanding what you just demonstrated, and we're just talking about the basics here. very well explained guys.
You are absolutely correct sir whatmost design engineers understand about making what they design you could fit in a thimble. I worked with a guy that had a story about this young collage grad Engineer applying for a job at Kearney & Trecker Manufacturing in Milwaukee, they made machine tools, back in the early 60's. Old man Trecker was showing the young kid through the shop, from one end to the other. When they were done my buddy heard Old man Trecker (as he referred to him) tell the young kid you can start tomorrow at 7am. we work 10 hour shifts to 5:30pm. OH and bring a pair of coveralls. Coveralls said the kid inquisitively. Yes son said Mr Trecker you going to know every phase of maturing and why every hole Nube or flat is in every casting in every machine we make before you put a pencil to a piece of paper.
I've found it's pretty easy to tell within a short time of looking at a blueprint, whether or not the engineer has any manufacturing experience. Unfortunately, the answer is usually NO. One particular part that I'll never forget was a hinge, machined out of billet aluminum...for the 'galley' door on a large commercial aircraft. Yes, the galley, where the flight attendants keep the snacks, etc. This included drilling the hinge pin hole (about .125" diameter) something like 4" deep! The hinge was nothing special, looked like any other door hinge you'd get at Home Depot, but was machined out of aluminum. Another part was the latch striker for the door, which had some ridiculous tolerance on the square shape on each end...+/- .0002" if I remember correctly! The part was probably 1.25" long, .375" diameter with a square cut on each end. The engineer had even dimensioned the points of the square with a tight tolerance (tight for what it is, maybe .005" total). My first thought is that the design group should have sought out an existing hinge manufacturer to try to find standardized parts already in production, or at a minimum, have that manufacturer produce the hinge to the required criteria...which should have been reviewed by someone with actual manufacturing experience, to question the tight tolerances and explain how this would significantly increase the cost of the part. And don't even get me started on the use of GD&T! I can't tell you how many times I've seen things like the flange face of a bushing called out to the bore with 'true position,' etc. The only conclusion I can make is that 'engineering' programs seem to be leaving out crucial parts of the process. A friend's brother was in college to become an engineer a few years ago, and I asked him if they ever mentioned 'design for manufacturing,' and he said, "No....what's that?"
As a mechanical engineer, I can understand why new engineers generally do not have a grasp on machining. The main focus in college is math, statics, dynamics and other engineering theories. We would be lucky to even have a few college courses on drawings, modelling, dimensioning, geometric tolerancing, and many other important subjects to creating a working drawing. As a result, most new engineers has never been exposed to design for manufacturability and not prepared for the real world when we work our first engineering job. I'm lucky that I went to aviation school and got my A&P license, so I have been exposed to the practical side of engineering. I also converted my personal end mill to a CNC machine, so I have exposure to working with metal fabrication. If you work in a larger company, there are other people available to show the new engineers the ropes. On the other hand, smaller companies do not have that option and the person has to learn on their own. Generally, this is where most of the problems occur. Without a good background in design and machining, most new engineers lack the understanding to create good design and drawings with the proper tolerancing. I often see or hear machinists belittle engineers. The fact is, its not an easy job when you are only provided specs and have to design a part or complex series of part to perform a function. There are many ways to make the parts to meet the design spec. An experienced designer would know what parts need to be done based on previous designs or knowledge from years of designing. New engineers may have no idea what to even do and create parts that can't be manufactured. In our company, we not only focus on DFM, but also for testing. The part not only has to be machinable, but it has to be done so that it can be tested properly. We even do tolerance stackup studies on parts bolted together to make sure all the parts will fit or align properly. Smaller companies may not have that level of process control so the drawings are less than satisfactory. Nobody is perfect. You have to ask yourself: if the shoe is on the other foot, would I be able to do the job? Are you able to complete the advanced science, engineering and mathematic course to earn an engineering degree? Can you design a product with only specs, model the parts, create the drawings, perform stress/thermal analysis and test the parts to make sure it meets the specs? Most people can't. If you add in a short development cycle, its not an easy task. From start to finish, some projects are less than a few months for developing an entire system. In some fields, you have to take an engineering test (EIT) and get a professional license after a few years in order to be certified to do the job. If its easy, everybody would be doing it. I've seen my share of new cocky engineers. Usually, they get a dose of reality when we do a design review before drawings are released. The senior engineers do a good job at slapping them down and making them humbled in front of their bosses. The ones who are not cocky and willing to learn, we teach them the right way from the start so they have a better understanding. I prefer to have the new engineers do drawing revisions or tooling first to get an understanding, but in today's world, they are thrown into the fire right away. As a result, the drawings and designs are less than ideal, but we live in different times. In the old days, engineers do the engineering only. We had draftsmen to do the model or drawings. Now, engineers are expected to do everything from the design, CAD modelling, drawing creation and also thermal/structural finite element analysis. Its quite a task to do it in a few short months. The worse part in today's world is if a new engineer is good, as soon as they get experience, they move to a new job with higher pay. We are left to train another new engineer over and over again. I can't wait to retire.
I randomly got this video in my feed, but one of the reasons I like to have a CNC is how many times I can screw up or change the part or scrap the whole idea and move to a differnt idea in prototyping. Material is cheap, screwing up on a design you had a shop make and had to redo is horrendous and it hurts, plus doing the work on your own makes you a better designer and have a better understanding of things, I'm fairly new to all of this but I figure 10 more years amid practice I'll be pretty decent
as a small CNC business i really appreciate how you broke this down so simply. nobody realizes the amount of time and effort that goes into making A "SIMPLE PART", let alone the amount of time it takes to get to a high level of manufacturing to produce parts of any size and complexity. This video helps shine a little light on it. thanks
I'm surprised he did that. You never finish a hole from both sides. Even if the hole is split due to a slot, like the smaller hole there. For the best accuracy, must always finish a hole all the way through in one shot.
@@gredangeo well to be honest. These guys are soooo new. Shouldnt even put up videos. It shows people how little they know about precision machining. Hey they are really nice guys no doubt and im an asshole for saying anything. They'll do fine. Slow, but fine. Or not :) i want them to make bux. Its a great profession. I now have vf3 in my home art studio. After a few decades of operating programing designing and engineering.
@@logannewman4532 normally maybe .0005 would be tight for me. Rarely do I have to go that tight. The tightest ive had to hit was .0002. kinda rediciulous but no big deal with good measuring device. St that tolerance temperature changes that pretty easily. I'm thinking those were for a press fit. Freezing the part to be inserted. This type tolerance is probably meant to add as little stress to the part after insertion. It's been so long I haven't thought bout it at all. Usually .001 is adequate. But you do want to do your bores and whatever else lines up all in one setup. I suppose if that hire these guys were doing isn't all that important, the way they did it must have been adequate, I just always use boring bar from one side of course. I can't remember if they mentioned any tolerances. I'm just use to making parts and assemblies that weigh 300+ pounds and spin 3600 rpm :) what I've done is nothing compared to what's done out there in the world. Amazing engineering and machining is done daily like it's nothing. I am nothing. I'm aware. :)
@@oceanic8424 Because sadly the computer nerds virtual world doesnt translate into the real world of machining. You can give me a print of what you want me to make but I have to design and build fixturing for it which costs time and money.
If you look at this part, it's a perfect shape for an aluminum extrusion. If we talk mass production. The extrusion production be outsources cheap and easy. The part just needs minimal CNC treatment and less material is wasted.
I dont know if its possible for aluminium, but I saw parts like this weld together from pipe with laser cut and bent plate. If you need tolerances you still have some materiał left for machining.
I asked a 6 year CNC guy to face off a 4" piece of 1020 round bar . Then drill a 1" hole 2" deep in it, then drill a 1/8' hole in the side. He did not drill the 1" hole deep enough. Broke the 1/8 bit in the side, welded it up to cover his mistake. And went too fast facing it off and left a poor finish. He said he was unable to use his CNC equipment, and did the best he could. BTW... The piece was discarded The moral of the story, you may ask? The true cost of CNC machining is ...the creation of a workforce unable to do the simplest of jobs, with out the aid of a $100K+ computerized work station.
You absolutely right. Just because they can set up a part on cnc and push the button to make it go they think they're a machinist. The programmer is the one that says what tools to put in and programs speeds and feeds in the program. Unfortunately back around 2000 they dropped tariffs on stuff coming from China. The results were 3/4 of small machine shops went out of business. And no one persude or trained to machine because there were no jobs. I know of 2 machine shops now that are looking for workers and there isn't any.
Its funny, because I asked a guy to do a simple part that would have taken 10 minutes on any number of cnc machines in our facility and he spend half a day on it because he was too busy worrying about using manual machines for clout. Stop with your nonsense.
Nice nice.. I am a human who works a job, no collage experience other than signing papers and bailing, but i like aviation & looking to be a pilot, and also i'm a maker enthusiast. i just like making everything. I built a CNC router but i need to get a CNC mill if i want to do anything serious. i had a cnc machinist job but my boss was a dangerous erratic fool. Anyway im interested because id like to open a shop and make stuff. building a plane is on the list of things to do.
Exactly, TIG weld two aluminum tabs onto section of ally tubing, but might only be able to get beads on the outsides of the part... then there are the dimensional tolerances. Could still be possible, but might need to fabricate a jig to position and hold everything to specs during welding.
@@noahhastings6145 Okay. I have the tendency to think CNC every time that I hear lathe or mill, vertical or horizontal. I forget that they can also be manually operated.
I've owned a CNC shop for nearly 40 years. That part is two ops and flip it to remove the excess. Wheel cut the slot You could use two vices and get two parts off at every push of the green button.
Good tips, was thinking this while watching the video.. I can't remember every making a part with a witness mark like that on purpose. I'm sure they will learn more as they go.
On a five axis it'd be one op plus a finish face. All critical dimension and geometry would be done in a single operation so it'd be as accurate as the machine is. A pair of parts like that would be $250-ish. A batch of 100 could get down to $30 each.
@@AndyRRR0791 lol, my thoughts exactly... I love 1 and done parts... either tab a non critical dim off and scotch wheel it off or just deck it on a tiny op 2. I think simpleish parts with tight multi sided features is about 95% of the 5axis work i see
Thanks for watching! Having a bigger machine, more vices, and/or more axes would give options for fewer operations. We used four operations on our machine because we have limited depth of cut with the diameter tools we can fit in our tool holders.
Personally I'd have made that from round bar using the 4th axis hold the stock horizontally. That way you can machine around all of the sides with the exception of the end, all without fixtures and having to keep setting up. It's way more accurate and I use it all the time. Then I'd part it off and hold it in the vice with some packing in the gap to clean up the end. You'd do it in much less time and without needing any tooling.
This, taking 4 setups to make this is ridiculous. At most, 2. With clever 4th axis use, 1 setup. I've actually made plenty of parts like this before exactly that way.
A lot of small machine shops would like to have a CNC machine to make a million parts for a big customer and think they buy a money printer. But there only has to be one competitor who offers the parts one cent cheaper and the new machine makes not a single chip.
As much as it sucks, those small batch parts are what keep a lot of small shops and manual shops in business, because they're only a waste of time for big CNC shops- unless you're willing to pay the outrageous cost
Based on the wording of the comment I am presuming that you were the supplier here. That's quite generous of you. I am sure that customer will be coming back to you for future work. Feel free to drop your website address here 👍
@@oceanic8424 I made an overnight custom part for an expensive RC aircraft and only charged $20 for 4 hours of work. When I gave the customer the part, he thought I was way overcharging. I'll not do that again.
@@user-qy9rg3nt2l Clearly, the customer was someone that knows next to nothing about manufacturing parts and could not appreciate what you had done. These are lessons learned. 👊👊👊
There are other costs you are not considering or did not mention, like the amortized cost of your machine. Most job shops will take on a fixed cost to an order to cover part of the expenditure for the machine that will be used. Again, like set up costs and tooling costs, this will be spread across the number of parts in the order. The more parts made, the cost per part drops. You have that cost in house as well, and you need to track it so you know when you have "paid for" your machine by spreading the purchase costs over a number of jobs. This also helps when considering the depreciation fo the machine for tax purposes. You can recoup some of your costs through tax savings if you keep track of things like this.
Most amortization schedule would be done one timeframe only ( x years) and not relevant to usage, unless you can demonstrate a real cycle based cost impediment which I doubt anyone would bother to calculate for manufacturing shop machinery.
When I worked at Boeing as a machinist they told us once that due to tolerances a 707 could vary 7 feet in overall length. I ran an electronic tracer and had tolerances on two parallel surfaces over a 6" span of +0.0/-.005 on a titanium part refueling nozzle. Every part I made passed inspection. Management came down on me once for making less parts than the first shift guy till I pointed to all his reject tags. That shut them up. Lol
One tip to reduce the machining time (because those 3D profiling is really unnecessary on your part): Using MasterCAM as an example: Draw out 2D profiles of the part. Top and side. Machine the top using 2D tool paths. Flip it over, repeat. Then lay it on its side, and machine the sides. The top and bottom machining would have established the roundness and the big bore in the middle. Then machining from the side would take care of the rest of the dimensions. Machine TWO part per vise. Your video may be a demonstration but machining 2 parts would have seriously increased your efficiency especially if you want to mass produce it (but since your machine does not have an ATC, the point is moot) If you have 3 vises on your machine (very common in a CNC environment) you will be able to machine top and bottom on vise 1, side A and side B on vise 2. And then you will be able to basically mass produce the thing. This is probably why making 100 costs so much less than making 2. Try to produce more parts per cycle if you can. Reloading vises every 2 minutes is VERY tedious especially when you need to make lots of parts. a 40 minute cycle is much more relaxing. You can basically kick back and relax while the machine is doing its thing. Which is why a ATC, even if it only has a limited number of slots, is so crucial in CNC. Though honestly would have found a used VMC for very little money if I were going to play around with CNC... but making youtube videos with sponsorship from Tormach may not be easy if that were the case.
I would machine it on 5 axis mill. All in one setup. From my experience I would say cycle time would be around 7 mins. If you would charge lets say £50 per hour of machining then it would give you ~£6 per part
@@Ddk90 The problem with a 5 axis is that you may not be able to put 3 vises side by side in a 5 axis, table may not be large enough, and such a setup wouldn't work for 5 axis anyways as the workpiece must swivel in various directions, and 3 vises gets in the way even if the machine is large enough. They only make sense for more complicated parts. Otherwise for most routine machining, 3 axis assembly line setup makes sense if you are mass producing.
@@taiwanluthiers I don’t think you understood my comment. I meant that I would be able to program this part from block of aluminium and to finish it in one operation in one vice. That’s what I do on daily basis. One vice, one block of stock, press cycle start, after ~6mins you have completely finished part. Besides chamfers on one side but you would deburr it by hand 👍
This is interesting, I personally wouldn’t touch the original tolerances, but as a mostly hobbyist fabricator I would charge around $150 for the 5 thou version. Which I would produce with a water jet and manual mill.
I spent around 2200$ for my DIY CNC including all the tools (and that's really a lot). I randomly check how much some parts cost if we would outsource them. Now we can get all the material we need nearby the cost is super low for all the small parts we make ourself. Now we're also converting a small mini lathe to CNC (and that will be completed within next week).
I know it is a late comment but if you have to make a bunch of these the part looks like it could be extruded, so get a long form of it and cut to size then do secondary machining for the side holes/profile then ream for precision. That would be the most economical way to make this part in bulk.
Man... there are some unusual thoughts down below about "cost" going on. The fact that you have a facility & property is a cost. Utilities, insurances, taxes, machines, machine amortization, tooling, fixtures, oils, coolants, inspection equipment, the network, the software, waste disposal, and so many things that create a rate of cost per hour. Labor, (at the machine & elsewhere)/ Cleaning, packaging, & shipping, billing also have costs. The material for this part is nearly negligible in regards to cost. Seemed to mention $10. But for time it looked like it took several hours and that's without the CAD work and design. In my shop the cost per hour is about $70. Prior to setup there is about 3-15 hours of work (depends on part complexity) by various engineers, quality, order entry / scheduling, purchasing, receiving folks. Then comes the setup & production along with clean, pack, final inspection, and ship. Then there's our expected profit. A part like this would be about 15-20%. A part like this, qty of 2... between $6-700 seems about right.
As someone who practically inherited a failing machine shop and ended up having to shut it down in 2015 due to being a young dumbshit that knew nothing outside of QC and being completely ignorant in running the business and making it grow- It's nice seeing that you guys are putting out information out there for people interested in manufacturing and giving out advice. Hope to see your planes in the skies of SoCal
When I was doing job costing, it was machine cost per hour, operator cost, tool cost, material costs divided by number of parts produced + bag and tag. I had to explain to so many customers that were new to cnc prototypes that it doesnt matter if I make 2 or 20, roughly same total price. only difference was material cost, 2 parts in an hour or 20 parts in an hour, total hour cost /2 or total hour cost /20
Dang, I had guessed that the parts where manufactured differently; one from a block and one from extrusion. If there were high quantity batches of parts I bet an extrusion could get those costs WAY down. It is crazy how just much money you can save when you spread out the cost of labor of the setup/programming over 100 parts instead of 2.
in my experience at a job shop, is 99% of the time we see +/- .005". but if the engineer specifically wants something to be like dead nuts, they will usually shoot us an email describing the importance of something and/or ofcourse using GD&T on the print. like if an engineer was like "this bolt hole pattern needs to be dead nuts with this o-ring groove' as the machinist we can understand that we dont have the best inspection tools but we can do this in one setup and be sure its accurate. so i think having good business comms is important
yeah, I ran a couple prototypes where we had to interface 2 OEM parts. At some point, it's just easier to go to the machinist and be like "this is the drawing, but they just need to fit" I could spend all day doing GD&T, but don't have the tools to verify they meet spec beyond my physical parts which act as a Go/No-Go.
Seeing your drilling op at 2 minutes, I gotta say you can increase your feeds and speeds. Looks like you have a Tormach pcnc 1100 which has a max spindle of 5140rpm. Check out FSWizard, it’s a mobile app. You plug in your machines max spindle, tell it what tool you want speeds and feeds for, the coatings on them, length they’re sticking out, etc. For drilling with say a 3/8” standard hss drill in 7075, run that sucker around 270 surface foot and .0036 chip load. (2752rpm, 19.88ipm). That’ll also cut costs, especially after prototyping
Curious. Knowing/expecting I'd be making many more, I'd at least built tooling to hold 2. Chuck the material for the 2 lowers, throw that in the mill while chucking 2 uppers in the other tool. Finish lowers #1 operation, pull the tooling, load the upper and run it's #1. While it's running, reorient or move over to #2 tooling for the lower.
We've had to do various one-off/prototype parts for aircraft manufacturers on a 6 metre, 6-axis mill. Some of the prices would make your eyes water for these, but on a production run it drops massively. Also to show how daft some companies are, we had to do a spare part for an aircraft that went out of production a few years back. When in production they were made 5 per billet (3m x 1m x 75mm billet) and cost around $20,000 for the 5 parts. They just wanted 1 part though even though they could have the other 4 for future spares. Paid full price for that 1 part. CNC machining is a funny world
Reminds me of when I needed a stepper motor to replace a piece of lab equipment. The previous generation had them available for $200 bucks. They didn't sell them for the new model. I found a company in china that could make them with a minimum order of 100. The cost? $2 each. Seriously. My boss said "but we dont need 100" and sent the equipment back to the manufacturer for repair. They charged us 2500 dollars and replaced the motor. In retrospect, I should have asked them if they could charge me for 100 and throw 90 of them in the trash. "They said they will sell us 10 for 400 dollars!" Hed probably have gone for it.
RUclips algorithm brought me here and I am thankful. Thank you for sharing. You have no idea how much this means to us who knows little about machining costs.
anytime I machine 1 or 2 parts its time and material, for most jobs I mount 3 double lock vises for 6 to 12 parts at a time , for higher production make a fixture and remember for high abrasive material you may need diamond coated cutters
Thanks for great video. Have you considered your time invested into machining the part on your own in workshop into the cost analysis? I mean often can happen that you think about how to make the part cheaper, not realizing that for example two hours of your time as an aerospace engineer is actually the cost of the part if you take the first offer available. For prototyping in this case of course. I have this kind of dilema often.
He only seemed to mention the cost of material... But then there is the machine and upkeep, the shop space, and time like you said. If its a hobby of yours then maybe its time well spent because you are enjoying yourself.. Thats worth a lot right there
Also, it will be more expensive from a small shop versus a large one. Small shops don't keep much raw material on hand and don't get as good of prices on material as a volume shop can get. They can have older CNCs that aren't in the best condition, that makes hitting those +/- .001 - .0005 tolerances much harder to get.
Love the video! People might love it more if you, if not but a few times in the beginning, show more of the aircraft throughout each video. Help people keep the end in mind, the context for each part, and the big picture progress!
I would have ran it about the same but with a few exceptions. I would have installed an expanding plug in the lower half that was in the soft jaws to keep the bore round while tightened in the vice. I’d use vice handle with a torque setting for repeatability. I’d run the bore undersize first so I could measure and correct for shift because it’s not a perfect world. Real world in a good machine, .001 true position between bore halves. Need it closer and rounder?leave .003 stock and hone to size. 7075 was the best aluminum alloy choice for fast, accurate machining.
Very cool guys! The one thing you didn't mention that I would be very interested in a detailed description was how much did it cost you in total to do those two prototype parts and please break down in every area as if you were prototyping for a customer such as Part Design Cad Time (software used) , material cost , cutter path programming time (what software used), machining time for both parts , cad design time for soft jaws , machining time for same and inspection deburring ,finishing time as if you were delivering to a customer. I think most will be shocked by the high numbers of prototype development. This will show the true cost of developing these two parts.Thanks for sharing that site for instant quote as I will definitely use that to experiment with some of my cad files.
Thanks for the video, really really helpful. I’m currently designing an almost identical shock bottom mount for a car and have been considering carbon forging, versus welding two plates to a pipe, vs outsourced CNC machining. I need 4 of them, and works out about $100 a piece from quotes I’ve had online. So sounds similar ballpark to yours when you factor in volume. I was curious as to the factors that made up the cost, including things like machining time and number of setups/passes. I was actually surprised that removing some of the ‘nice but not essential’ details that I could hand-add myself after the fact didn’t change the price, so added them back in again!
How do you know where exactly to place the part in the clamp? IE: If you place the part 20mm to the left or right, how does it not cut/mill it out of spec? I love watching these but when I see pieces being flipped multiple times I often wonder how things aren't getting messed up. Almost like a jig where you could only put a piece in one way, that's almost what I am expecting to see. (sorry for the silly question)
Love the videos. If I could just suggest one thing. When you are editing your videos, be sure to put them into some sound software that can visualise the sound frequencies. There are some really high pitched whines in your videos (which is of course expected in your environment) it's just people like me with young ears it can make videos unbearable to watch. You should be able to really easily filter out with a low pass filter on and take out the 15-20khz+ sounds
Whether it will fit or not depends on your tolerances. If it's a part for your high end gear you can be sure the company that made the parts have their own standards, which also includes quality control. There are tools for that control: specially machined and "ground" calibrated parts - rectangular or oval in shape, for example. Oftentimes clients do their own quality control. So it all boils down to tolerances :) hope it answers your question!
Good job, but one recommendation, you should profile the whole part depth in the previous op to avoid the blend/step line. Or try a large ball end mill profile if necessary.
Set up and fixturing is the biggest expense on any multipart job. Optimizing tool paths and roughing is where the time is saved. Manual tool change vs automatic is a tenfold time savings. That pecking drill retraction speed and distance optimization could have saved you a lot of time, for example. I learned (taught myself) CNC when there were no CADCAM programs (IBM 386 days), only a calculator and a drawing. Machine and fixture rigidity and repeatability will save you a lot of time, money and frustration. Fun stuff. :D
Nice demonstration. Why you do have to manually flip the piece around for each ‘op’? Shouldn’t the machine be able to do that automatically as part of the process? And what happens to all the aluminum waste/cuttings? Can they be collected and recycled back into aluminum ingots for use in future jobs?
Without getting too in depth regarding cost with CNC machining, die casting and surface finishing, is there a way to roughly work these out to get within a good rough estimate category to initiate negotiations with a vendor when looking at their initial proposal which shows a breakdown of components?
I would love to see a cost work up of this part redesigned in a 6000 series alloy and manufactured via welding two 2D profiled ears onto a piece of tubing. Even if the main bore needs to be reamed afterwards, it should cost about 20% of the fully CNC'd part you described.
I think that would be cheaper, but maybe not as good a solution for an aircraft part. More inspection and failure points, reduced strength in the weld zone, and you'd probably have to bore the tubing out to get the fit they wanted. But if it were for a car? Yeah, switch it to plain carbon steel, make it out of tubing and some water jet cut ears and it would be way cheaper, stronger and more fatigue resistant than the aluminum part, and not much heavier.
400 to 600 for a 1 time job is about normal for those 2 parts. Most of that cost is writing the programs, figuring out the order of operations, making fixturing, etc. If it was a regular production part with proper tooling and optimized programs already made to speedily cut the part, about 10% of that would be about right. A typical 80 dollar/hour machine price should see about 15-20 or so of those things made in an 8 hour shift, plus material cost of 7075 aluminum. If you guys make a lot of smallish aluminum parts like that, a cheap 5 axis machine like a 3 axis with a trunnion added on with a dovetail attachment for instance could speed it up even faster. If there are lots of machine shops in your area, a used Haas + 2 axis trunnion can probably be had for around 100k.
I'll add to Apollolux's statement: Setup Time * Machine Rate / Run Quantity #Operators * Labor Rate / Pieces per Hour Machine Rate / Pieces per Hour Material Components/Outsourcing Packaging Scrap % Efficiency Factor Markup% Possibly factoring in any other inspection that goes above and beyond typical
it would be nice if you cast the part or form the part, finish the tolerances, then case harden the material. since it's aluminum, at volume, it would cost less, improve strength and increase durability
now i have some experience with xometry i can offer advice .. When you order parts for cnc machine work , save a duplicate of that order as a quote.. What happens is , you get the parts, sell em over a month or so and go back to order more, Because you didnt save it as a quote , you get a new quote.. In my case , the same exact parts went up 260% in price from december 26th till today , feb 25..Dont delete your old quotes, and always make a duplicate quote before you place an order.
The old quote wont be valid anymore anyways. Xometry has a time limit that quotes are valid for. You can't** use the same quote from 9 months ago, material costs change, available shops ready to make them, etc. Edit** misspelled
@@mecrob9852 the prices did drop back down after the chinese new year.. The quotes are held for a certain amount of time i dont recall , but youre right 90 days later they wont honor them
As a manufacturer. We did business with some - (competition) of Xometry, but not Xometry itself, so I am curious how Xometry works. We noticed a significant price drop to the manufacturing side, so low to a point it wasnt even close to being profitable anymore. I tought, some prices where very unfair and its all on a take it or leave it bases... So we decided to - leave it. I think those websites do a great job, but I also noticed a great risk. Because what if you invest a great deal in extra capacity and those website just drop the prices like no tomorrow and all that work just goes to low cost countries in eastern Europe or Asia. I felt that - there was no benefit. - AND - I felt the risk to do a great deal of business with them is just to big. How do you feel about this?
Yea, even accounting for their own time / labor would have been nice. This is basic business practice, I'd argue, they haven't really explored this properly... It might be easy cheaper to do this outsourced when factoring in time, labor costs, tooling upkeep and opportunity costs
Yes. It was CLICK BAIT to label this with anything like "true cost" in the title. This was merely a quick run-through of one "instant quote" bit of software.
What kind of endmills are you using? Also software? If you use variable geometry endmills or high speeds and feeds with low feed per tooth with a trochoidal tool path your tormach could do it with less strain on the spindle/drive. Also I would suggest from personal usage that you should buy some short insert drills to define the initial shape of the bore in one stroke
If you want to make the most of CNC machining, consider making the parts manually. If you know how to effectively make parts manually, you can accelerate the process with CNC. --- A great example is firearms. Simple slots, pockets, surfacing, and holes. -- Another great example is cylinder heads for GM V8's. Deck the casting, drill & tap holes in XY to fixed depth, chamfer, flip the part, locate from the drilled/tapped holes onto an angled fixture, Drill the valve guides, bore for the valve seats, Station 2, heat the head and install the valve seats. Re-locate the part back onto the angled fixture, surface the valve seats, flycut the mating surface. -- Bad example : Non-circular curved surface with a mirror finish. Molds for plastic parts. Lots of points in XY that change the tool deflection and cut quality. -- If you're into Welded parts, check out Precision Tube Laser. They laser cut steel tubing and L-section. Tubular structures have not been very feasible until now. The old way was to stamp holes in sheet metal, then fold it into the tubing. For tube frames, the old way was to make fixtures and notch the parts in batches with a milling machine. Laser cut weldments are much more repeatable. CNC plasma is also good for larger thicker pieces.
One cost US$400 while cost US$40, that your thumbnail said. As far as I notice, to make combustion engine parts high compression ratio need more steel rather than Aluminium 7075. I just don't get clear message which cheaper between CNC or die casting, just get idea that CNC is future 4.0 which need material lost. Btw I like this kind of video.
Just a thought, but longer term, that would be a great extrusion profile part. Since the outside is less critical, extrude that profile and then do a light finish machining for the bore and bolt hole, cut to length. Part cost would drop a fair bit.... It does help if you are running 2500 to 5000lbs worth of parts... extrusion weight. Just something to keep in mind for overall costs... Right now, extrusion cost is cheaper than sheet aluminum.
And, IIRC extrusion also improves material properties in the direction of the grain? I'm a little concerned about have such a high cyclic load component such as the landing gear, made of aluminum, which has very poor fatigue characteristics and is often difficult to predict service life in such a situation, as every landing is a different load cycle situation, effectively. Obviously it can be beefed up as needed, but converting to (ideally) high strength steel in the future is probably not an option due to weight.
The way i'd do it, given you have the mill long enough, is add +3mm in stock height, machine full part height to eliminate the blend (along with necessary holes etc), then put in in soft jaws and finish what you need! I think it'd be faster and more labor effective, though to each his own! Cheers!
Did DarkAero purchase the Tormach or lease. The 1100MX is about $25k, yes? That is a factor in your in house cost for parts... beyond raw stock, then there is electricity and other supplies.
so what your saying is that i should get machining equipment and learn how to machine to replace the parts on my future farm equipment...... I APPROVE!
Can you list the time you spent making these parts , including creating your CAM files, fixtures & run time of the machine. Just as a guess , I will say you spent more than 10 hours on the 2 parts you made.
There's another way to have done this job, why not just rough And finish it from the one side and then go straight to the soft jaws? Also I might be mistaken but that end mill looks like it could have completed that hole to depth from 1 side, so there would have been no need to stress about it not lining up on the 2nd set up or if you picked the roughed hole up properly. I only saw 2 setups ... maybe 3 if you had to machine the slot with no radius in the corners. Also i see there are clearance holes on the side so thats another setup
Great video, Wish i lived somewhere material was so cheap half the time i can't even get scrap stuff for that cheap. The catch is you are still using shop time and wear/tear on your machines it does bring cost way down but can quickly add back up if you include design time. moral of the story everyone should have 3d printers + CNC machines haha
Great video. I don't work for a shop but know I get crazy looks when I tell people how much a part will cost to get made at the shop down the street. Just curious, do you not value your own time? You say it only costs you material but not really. You have a significant amount of personal time in this. It looks like you have at least 4 or more setups in that part. This said, the first step in making the part cheaper is to reduce the number of setups. I can see making this in 2 setups with no soft jaws. I'm not certain where your critical dims are but its possible. Obviously you can't dictate how another shop makes it but when making it yourself you can reduce your own time invested.
You mist a point in your cost comparison, how much did it cost you to do it in-house? It is not only your raw material, your time is worth something. While you do those, you are not working on something else that might be more worthy of being made in-house and pushing the deadline. You also have wear on the tool and machine. You need to know your shop time cost to better calculate/compare. You don't only outsource for parts outside your capabilities, you also outsource for parts that you don't have time or would not be cost worthy to do in-house. Anyhow, great video!
+/-.001"? That's a big tolerance from where I worked. I was doing OD grinds with a normal tolerance of +0/-.0005", so a callout for +/-.001" was considered easy work.
This is so cool... I have been a partner for xometry for 4 years now but I had no clue how the customer side of it looked or worked. It's weird when my work and youtube hobbies meet.... btw please let me make some 5 axis part (for freeeezies) for you guys so I can put it on my youtube channel.... all my XOM and other work has NDAs so I can't show the machining
@EngineeringScience Thank you and thanks for checking out the video! Send us an email at info@darkaero.com and we can send you a CAD file for a 5-axis part we are working on. :)
The saying in engineering goes: If you can't make it precise, make it adjustable. This video gives you a great insight into why there are so many parts in mass production that allow for adjustment. Assembling 100 parts on a wide tolerance margin and then turning some set screws to get everything to fit together properly makes a huge difference in cost.
Great video!
Except where compactness, strength, or weight are important. Adjustability compromises a lot.
@@appa609 which turns out to be in far fewer places then you'd think.
In an aircraft, weight is ALWAYS important. Every milligram matters.
Adjustability adds weight and complexity. Neither is desirable when it can be omitted by design.
@@GermanTopGameTVdid you forget we're watching an aerospace video?
I ran across your video by chance, and I enjoyed the demo... however, as a former CNC machinist/programmer I saw a few things during the machining process that could have sped up your process, as well as created a perfect bore through the part without having the chance of a mismatch. When working with aluminum, don't be afraid to hog out more material during roughing at a higher feedrate... it's the best material to machine (metal-wise) and rip through without loading your spindle torque and tool deflection. Many times you can cut your cycle time in half by bumping up the D.O.C. along with a slight increase in feedrate and it will throw a better chip (both drilling and milling). Also, if you have access to a boring head, I'd suggest utilizing it to finish your thru bore if it requires tighter tolerances on diameter and concentricity... it will give you a consistent microfinish while holding your tight tolerances and it only takes 1 operation to finish. It also gives you the option to use an arbor fixture for securing the part while finishing the outer profile. Just some tips from an old machinist and a new subscriber!
Do you have experience machining inconel 718
@@eatablellama6581 Grinding, yes. Down to a couple of tenths. Pretty much the only material we used (gas turbines). Not a big deal for someone that knows their way around a finish grinder. Ran a multi-axis CNC Bryant, Brown & Sharp, I.D, O.D, you name it. Fun times at Pratt & Whitney, Lycoming, Sikorsky Aircraft and Honeywell. I miss it :-(
If you just made all that up then that was brilliant because i believed every word
@@brianbailey462 Nope, not made up... just speaking from experience!
@@nerfburger1511 well just know some folks in this world, like me for example, really appreciate what people like you do. Innovators, inventors, and people who make things.
33 years as a manufacturing engineer in Aerospace......and I can only dream of design engineers understanding what you just demonstrated, and we're just talking about the basics here. very well explained guys.
You are absolutely correct sir whatmost design engineers understand about making what they design you could fit in a thimble. I worked with a guy that had a story about this young collage grad Engineer applying for a job at Kearney & Trecker Manufacturing in Milwaukee, they made machine tools, back in the early 60's.
Old man Trecker was showing the young kid through the shop, from one end to the other. When they were done my buddy heard Old man Trecker (as he referred to him) tell the young kid you can start tomorrow at 7am. we work 10 hour shifts to 5:30pm. OH and bring a pair of coveralls. Coveralls said the kid inquisitively. Yes son said Mr Trecker you going to know every phase of maturing and why every hole Nube or flat is in every casting in every machine we make before you put a pencil to a piece of paper.
They always think if it works on Paper it has to work on a Machine. I have seen some Cocky Engineers get really humbled by Peasant Machinist.
I’m the lead designer for my high school robotics team and my number one problem with my team is that they don’t understand DFM.
I've found it's pretty easy to tell within a short time of looking at a blueprint, whether or not the engineer has any manufacturing experience. Unfortunately, the answer is usually NO. One particular part that I'll never forget was a hinge, machined out of billet aluminum...for the 'galley' door on a large commercial aircraft. Yes, the galley, where the flight attendants keep the snacks, etc. This included drilling the hinge pin hole (about .125" diameter) something like 4" deep! The hinge was nothing special, looked like any other door hinge you'd get at Home Depot, but was machined out of aluminum.
Another part was the latch striker for the door, which had some ridiculous tolerance on the square shape on each end...+/- .0002" if I remember correctly! The part was probably 1.25" long, .375" diameter with a square cut on each end. The engineer had even dimensioned the points of the square with a tight tolerance (tight for what it is, maybe .005" total).
My first thought is that the design group should have sought out an existing hinge manufacturer to try to find standardized parts already in production, or at a minimum, have that manufacturer produce the hinge to the required criteria...which should have been reviewed by someone with actual manufacturing experience, to question the tight tolerances and explain how this would significantly increase the cost of the part.
And don't even get me started on the use of GD&T! I can't tell you how many times I've seen things like the flange face of a bushing called out to the bore with 'true position,' etc. The only conclusion I can make is that 'engineering' programs seem to be leaving out crucial parts of the process. A friend's brother was in college to become an engineer a few years ago, and I asked him if they ever mentioned 'design for manufacturing,' and he said, "No....what's that?"
As a mechanical engineer, I can understand why new engineers generally do not have a grasp on machining. The main focus in college is math, statics, dynamics and other engineering theories. We would be lucky to even have a few college courses on drawings, modelling, dimensioning, geometric tolerancing, and many other important subjects to creating a working drawing. As a result, most new engineers has never been exposed to design for manufacturability and not prepared for the real world when we work our first engineering job. I'm lucky that I went to aviation school and got my A&P license, so I have been exposed to the practical side of engineering. I also converted my personal end mill to a CNC machine, so I have exposure to working with metal fabrication. If you work in a larger company, there are other people available to show the new engineers the ropes. On the other hand, smaller companies do not have that option and the person has to learn on their own. Generally, this is where most of the problems occur. Without a good background in design and machining, most new engineers lack the understanding to create good design and drawings with the proper tolerancing.
I often see or hear machinists belittle engineers. The fact is, its not an easy job when you are only provided specs and have to design a part or complex series of part to perform a function. There are many ways to make the parts to meet the design spec. An experienced designer would know what parts need to be done based on previous designs or knowledge from years of designing. New engineers may have no idea what to even do and create parts that can't be manufactured. In our company, we not only focus on DFM, but also for testing. The part not only has to be machinable, but it has to be done so that it can be tested properly. We even do tolerance stackup studies on parts bolted together to make sure all the parts will fit or align properly. Smaller companies may not have that level of process control so the drawings are less than satisfactory.
Nobody is perfect. You have to ask yourself: if the shoe is on the other foot, would I be able to do the job? Are you able to complete the advanced science, engineering and mathematic course to earn an engineering degree? Can you design a product with only specs, model the parts, create the drawings, perform stress/thermal analysis and test the parts to make sure it meets the specs? Most people can't. If you add in a short development cycle, its not an easy task. From start to finish, some projects are less than a few months for developing an entire system. In some fields, you have to take an engineering test (EIT) and get a professional license after a few years in order to be certified to do the job. If its easy, everybody would be doing it.
I've seen my share of new cocky engineers. Usually, they get a dose of reality when we do a design review before drawings are released. The senior engineers do a good job at slapping them down and making them humbled in front of their bosses. The ones who are not cocky and willing to learn, we teach them the right way from the start so they have a better understanding. I prefer to have the new engineers do drawing revisions or tooling first to get an understanding, but in today's world, they are thrown into the fire right away. As a result, the drawings and designs are less than ideal, but we live in different times. In the old days, engineers do the engineering only. We had draftsmen to do the model or drawings. Now, engineers are expected to do everything from the design, CAD modelling, drawing creation and also thermal/structural finite element analysis. Its quite a task to do it in a few short months.
The worse part in today's world is if a new engineer is good, as soon as they get experience, they move to a new job with higher pay. We are left to train another new engineer over and over again. I can't wait to retire.
I randomly got this video in my feed, but one of the reasons I like to have a CNC is how many times I can screw up or change the part or scrap the whole idea and move to a differnt idea in prototyping. Material is cheap, screwing up on a design you had a shop make and had to redo is horrendous and it hurts, plus doing the work on your own makes you a better designer and have a better understanding of things, I'm fairly new to all of this but I figure 10 more years amid practice I'll be pretty decent
Yes. Building things on your own is the best option and Something everyone should do and try
You didn't get this randomly. RUclips controls your mind/
Judging by this video, it'll be cheaper to buy one's own CNC machine for just a small project, than outsource.
Not since biden was elected steel went up 40 percent over night
@@GenghisKhan311 Source?
as a small CNC business i really appreciate how you broke this down so simply. nobody realizes the amount of time and effort that goes into making A "SIMPLE PART", let alone the amount of time it takes to get to a high level of manufacturing to produce parts of any size and complexity. This video helps shine a little light on it. thanks
Leave stock in the bore on the first side then finish the bore thru while finishing the second side. Eliminates any blend issues.
I'm surprised he did that. You never finish a hole from both sides. Even if the hole is split due to a slot, like the smaller hole there. For the best accuracy, must always finish a hole all the way through in one shot.
@@gredangeo well to be honest. These guys are soooo new. Shouldnt even put up videos. It shows people how little they know about precision machining. Hey they are really nice guys no doubt and im an asshole for saying anything. They'll do fine. Slow, but fine. Or not :) i want them to make bux. Its a great profession. I now have vf3 in my home art studio. After a few decades of operating programing designing and engineering.
@@nobody617 Makes me wonder what they consider a "high level of precision". To me that's .00005"
@@logannewman4532 normally maybe .0005 would be tight for me. Rarely do I have to go that tight. The tightest ive had to hit was .0002. kinda rediciulous but no big deal with good measuring device. St that tolerance temperature changes that pretty easily. I'm thinking those were for a press fit. Freezing the part to be inserted. This type tolerance is probably meant to add as little stress to the part after insertion. It's been so long I haven't thought bout it at all. Usually .001 is adequate. But you do want to do your bores and whatever else lines up all in one setup. I suppose if that hire these guys were doing isn't all that important, the way they did it must have been adequate, I just always use boring bar from one side of course. I can't remember if they mentioned any tolerances. I'm just use to making parts and assemblies that weigh 300+ pounds and spin 3600 rpm :) what I've done is nothing compared to what's done out there in the world. Amazing engineering and machining is done daily like it's nothing. I am nothing. I'm aware. :)
@@nobody617 One more zero. I occasionally have to hold half a tenth.
The true cost of CNC machining also includes the price of the machine and the cost of the labor involved in designing the part(s) in the first place.
The part usually needs to be designed by you regardless whether you do it in house or at a shop
If you're supplying all the CAD files ready-to-go to the CNC mfr/shop, why should there be any additional "design" costs?
@@oceanic8424 For when the designer, who's never run a mill before, doesn't think about fixturing.
@@oceanic8424 they are ready to go when they have the path files not only cad files
@@oceanic8424 Because sadly the computer nerds virtual world doesnt translate into the real world of machining. You can give me a print of what you want me to make but I have to design and build fixturing for it which costs time and money.
If you look at this part, it's a perfect shape for an aluminum extrusion. If we talk mass production. The extrusion production be outsources cheap and easy. The part just needs minimal CNC treatment and less material is wasted.
I dont know if its possible for aluminium, but I saw parts like this weld together from pipe with laser cut and bent plate. If you need tolerances you still have some materiał left for machining.
I am so glad that you tube recommended me this video and this chanel
Ditto. Subbed
@@dirtboy896 Double ditto. Subbed hard.
Me too
I asked a 6 year CNC guy to face off a 4" piece of 1020 round bar . Then drill a 1" hole 2" deep in it, then drill a 1/8' hole in the side.
He did not drill the 1" hole deep enough. Broke the 1/8 bit in the side, welded it up to cover his mistake. And went too fast facing it off and left a poor finish. He said he was unable to use his CNC equipment, and did the best he could. BTW... The piece was discarded
The moral of the story, you may ask? The true cost of CNC machining is ...the creation of a workforce unable to do the simplest of jobs, with out the aid of a $100K+ computerized work station.
You absolutely right. Just because they can set up a part on cnc and push the button to make it go they think they're a machinist. The programmer is the one that says what tools to put in and programs speeds and feeds in the program. Unfortunately back around 2000 they dropped tariffs on stuff coming from China. The results were 3/4 of small machine shops went out of business. And no one persude or trained to machine because there were no jobs. I know of 2 machine shops now that are looking for workers and there isn't any.
Its funny, because I asked a guy to do a simple part that would have taken 10 minutes on any number of cnc machines in our facility and he spend half a day on it because he was too busy worrying about using manual machines for clout.
Stop with your nonsense.
Meanwhile Vietnamese and Mexicans taking the few jobs left here
@@JuanHernandez-ub3ez No.
I'm an 8yr Navy vet, current engineering student, lifelong aviation enthusiast and maker.... It gives me genuine inspiration seeing you all do this.
JR, so happy to hear that! Thank you for following along! 🚀✅
Nice nice..
I am a human who works a job, no collage experience other than signing papers and bailing, but i like aviation & looking to be a pilot, and also i'm a maker enthusiast.
i just like making everything. I built a CNC router but i need to get a CNC mill if i want to do anything serious. i had a cnc machinist job but my boss was a dangerous erratic fool.
Anyway im interested because id like to open a shop and make stuff. building a plane is on the list of things to do.
@@darkshadowsx5949 There's a book called Flying on Your Own Wings. It would probably interest you. Amazon ~$25
I am also an 8yr Navy vet (Subs) and engineering student about to graduate this spring, what program are you in?
@@fisherholmsfly I always thought subs were cool. Air side though...not too many tow tractors on a sub haha. Mech ENG atm. You?
Cost analysis was really interesting, I started looking at this as 'weld two plates on a pipe 'but I was wrong :)
Exactly, TIG weld two aluminum tabs onto section of ally tubing, but might only be able to get beads on the outsides of the part... then there are the dimensional tolerances. Could still be possible, but might need to fabricate a jig to position and hold everything to specs during welding.
@@oceanic8424 how do you do if the I.D. of the pipe is not available at the right size? Remember, the tolerance was 0.001 inch, I think.
@@jtcmlt1 Bore it in a lathe
@@noahhastings6145 Okay. I have the tendency to think CNC every time that I hear lathe or mill, vertical or horizontal. I forget that they can also be manually operated.
It is just a clevis, could have left it square.
I've owned a CNC shop for nearly 40 years.
That part is two ops and flip it to remove the excess. Wheel cut the slot You could use two vices and get two parts off at every push of the green button.
Good tips, was thinking this while watching the video.. I can't remember every making a part with a witness mark like that on purpose. I'm sure they will learn more as they go.
@@texastad1989
Actually I want to ask you.... is it easy to make plastic mould in cnc machining
On a five axis it'd be one op plus a finish face. All critical dimension and geometry would be done in a single operation so it'd be as accurate as the machine is. A pair of parts like that would be $250-ish. A batch of 100 could get down to $30 each.
@@AndyRRR0791 lol, my thoughts exactly... I love 1 and done parts... either tab a non critical dim off and scotch wheel it off or just deck it on a tiny op 2.
I think simpleish parts with tight multi sided features is about 95% of the 5axis work i see
Thanks for watching! Having a bigger machine, more vices, and/or more axes would give options for fewer operations. We used four operations on our machine because we have limited depth of cut with the diameter tools we can fit in our tool holders.
Personally I'd have made that from round bar using the 4th axis hold the stock horizontally. That way you can machine around all of the sides with the exception of the end, all without fixtures and having to keep setting up. It's way more accurate and I use it all the time. Then I'd part it off and hold it in the vice with some packing in the gap to clean up the end.
You'd do it in much less time and without needing any tooling.
This, taking 4 setups to make this is ridiculous. At most, 2. With clever 4th axis use, 1 setup. I've actually made plenty of parts like this before exactly that way.
A lot of small machine shops would like to have a CNC machine to make a million parts for a big customer and think they buy a money printer.
But there only has to be one competitor who offers the parts one cent cheaper and the new machine makes not a single chip.
Tell me about the situation that caused the vice to be milled out. Did the guy get fired?
now i know not to outsource my pain in the ass parts, i was thinking about outsourcing 20 or so but thered be no profit when i sell em.
As much as it sucks, those small batch parts are what keep a lot of small shops and manual shops in business, because they're only a waste of time for big CNC shops- unless you're willing to pay the outrageous cost
I got an eye roll when I made 2 custom RC plane parts overnight and only charged $20.
Somtimes its about helping, not making money :)
Based on the wording of the comment I am presuming that you were the supplier here. That's quite generous of you. I am sure that customer will be coming back to you for future work. Feel free to drop your website address here 👍
@@oceanic8424 I made an overnight custom part for an expensive RC aircraft and only charged $20 for 4 hours of work. When I gave the customer the part, he thought I was way overcharging.
I'll not do that again.
@@user-qy9rg3nt2l Clearly, the customer was someone that knows next to nothing about manufacturing parts and could not appreciate what you had done. These are lessons learned.
👊👊👊
@@oceanic8424 Agreed 100%
There are other costs you are not considering or did not mention, like the amortized cost of your machine. Most job shops will take on a fixed cost to an order to cover part of the expenditure for the machine that will be used. Again, like set up costs and tooling costs, this will be spread across the number of parts in the order. The more parts made, the cost per part drops. You have that cost in house as well, and you need to track it so you know when you have "paid for" your machine by spreading the purchase costs over a number of jobs. This also helps when considering the depreciation fo the machine for tax purposes. You can recoup some of your costs through tax savings if you keep track of things like this.
Most amortization schedule would be done one timeframe only ( x years) and not relevant to usage, unless you can demonstrate a real cycle based cost impediment which I doubt anyone would bother to calculate for manufacturing shop machinery.
When I worked at Boeing as a machinist they told us once that due to tolerances a 707 could vary 7 feet in overall length.
I ran an electronic tracer and had tolerances on two parallel surfaces over a 6" span of +0.0/-.005 on a titanium part refueling nozzle. Every part I made passed inspection.
Management came down on me once for making less parts than the first shift guy till I pointed to all his reject tags.
That shut them up. Lol
One tip to reduce the machining time (because those 3D profiling is really unnecessary on your part): Using MasterCAM as an example: Draw out 2D profiles of the part. Top and side. Machine the top using 2D tool paths. Flip it over, repeat. Then lay it on its side, and machine the sides.
The top and bottom machining would have established the roundness and the big bore in the middle. Then machining from the side would take care of the rest of the dimensions.
Machine TWO part per vise. Your video may be a demonstration but machining 2 parts would have seriously increased your efficiency especially if you want to mass produce it (but since your machine does not have an ATC, the point is moot)
If you have 3 vises on your machine (very common in a CNC environment) you will be able to machine top and bottom on vise 1, side A and side B on vise 2. And then you will be able to basically mass produce the thing. This is probably why making 100 costs so much less than making 2.
Try to produce more parts per cycle if you can. Reloading vises every 2 minutes is VERY tedious especially when you need to make lots of parts. a 40 minute cycle is much more relaxing. You can basically kick back and relax while the machine is doing its thing.
Which is why a ATC, even if it only has a limited number of slots, is so crucial in CNC.
Though honestly would have found a used VMC for very little money if I were going to play around with CNC... but making youtube videos with sponsorship from Tormach may not be easy if that were the case.
Well honestly this Tormach is a toy when speaking of mass production Machines.
I would machine it on 5 axis mill. All in one setup. From my experience I would say cycle time would be around 7 mins. If you would charge lets say £50 per hour of machining then it would give you ~£6 per part
@@Ddk90 The problem with a 5 axis is that you may not be able to put 3 vises side by side in a 5 axis, table may not be large enough, and such a setup wouldn't work for 5 axis anyways as the workpiece must swivel in various directions, and 3 vises gets in the way even if the machine is large enough. They only make sense for more complicated parts.
Otherwise for most routine machining, 3 axis assembly line setup makes sense if you are mass producing.
@@taiwanluthiers I don’t think you understood my comment. I meant that I would be able to program this part from block of aluminium and to finish it in one operation in one vice. That’s what I do on daily basis. One vice, one block of stock, press cycle start, after ~6mins you have completely finished part. Besides chamfers on one side but you would deburr it by hand 👍
eh, lets not be foolish here, production is a mindset, not a machine.@@sparklenebula6042
Dude, fantastic work. I started out with a Tormach 770. Those Tormachs are a great way to get started .
Excellent video because it explains what you do in DarkAero I, in-house versus outsourcing and cost versus economy is scale. Can't applaud you enough.
Azzam, thank you and thank you for watching!
This is interesting, I personally wouldn’t touch the original tolerances, but as a mostly hobbyist fabricator I would charge around $150 for the 5 thou version. Which I would produce with a water jet and manual mill.
I spent around 2200$ for my DIY CNC including all the tools (and that's really a lot). I randomly check how much some parts cost if we would outsource them. Now we can get all the material we need nearby the cost is super low for all the small parts we make ourself.
Now we're also converting a small mini lathe to CNC (and that will be completed within next week).
I know it is a late comment but if you have to make a bunch of these the part looks like it could be extruded, so get a long form of it and cut to size then do secondary machining for the side holes/profile then ream for precision. That would be the most economical way to make this part in bulk.
Man... there are some unusual thoughts down below about "cost" going on.
The fact that you have a facility & property is a cost. Utilities, insurances, taxes, machines, machine amortization, tooling, fixtures, oils, coolants, inspection equipment, the network, the software, waste disposal, and so many things that create a rate of cost per hour. Labor, (at the machine & elsewhere)/ Cleaning, packaging, & shipping, billing also have costs.
The material for this part is nearly negligible in regards to cost. Seemed to mention $10. But for time it looked like it took several hours and that's without the CAD work and design.
In my shop the cost per hour is about $70. Prior to setup there is about 3-15 hours of work (depends on part complexity) by various engineers, quality, order entry / scheduling, purchasing, receiving folks. Then comes the setup & production along with clean, pack, final inspection, and ship. Then there's our expected profit. A part like this would be about 15-20%. A part like this, qty of 2... between $6-700 seems about right.
Agree, thanks for commenting. This video over simplified the cost of machining.
As someone who practically inherited a failing machine shop and ended up having to shut it down in 2015 due to being a young dumbshit that knew nothing outside of QC and being completely ignorant in running the business and making it grow- It's nice seeing that you guys are putting out information out there for people interested in manufacturing and giving out advice. Hope to see your planes in the skies of SoCal
When I was doing job costing, it was machine cost per hour, operator cost, tool cost, material costs divided by number of parts produced + bag and tag.
I had to explain to so many customers that were new to cnc prototypes that it doesnt matter if I make 2 or 20, roughly same total price. only difference was material cost, 2 parts in an hour or 20 parts in an hour, total hour cost /2 or total hour cost /20
Dang, I had guessed that the parts where manufactured differently; one from a block and one from extrusion. If there were high quantity batches of parts I bet an extrusion could get those costs WAY down. It is crazy how just much money you can save when you spread out the cost of labor of the setup/programming over 100 parts instead of 2.
in my experience at a job shop, is 99% of the time we see +/- .005". but if the engineer specifically wants something to be like dead nuts, they will usually shoot us an email describing the importance of something and/or ofcourse using GD&T on the print. like if an engineer was like "this bolt hole pattern needs to be dead nuts with this o-ring groove' as the machinist we can understand that we dont have the best inspection tools but we can do this in one setup and be sure its accurate. so i think having good business comms is important
yeah, I ran a couple prototypes where we had to interface 2 OEM parts. At some point, it's just easier to go to the machinist and be like "this is the drawing, but they just need to fit" I could spend all day doing GD&T, but don't have the tools to verify they meet spec beyond my physical parts which act as a Go/No-Go.
@@RaphYkun yup! Makes our life easier too haha
Seeing your drilling op at 2 minutes, I gotta say you can increase your feeds and speeds. Looks like you have a Tormach pcnc 1100 which has a max spindle of 5140rpm.
Check out FSWizard, it’s a mobile app. You plug in your machines max spindle, tell it what tool you want speeds and feeds for, the coatings on them, length they’re sticking out, etc. For drilling with say a 3/8” standard hss drill in 7075, run that sucker around 270 surface foot and .0036 chip load. (2752rpm, 19.88ipm). That’ll also cut costs, especially after prototyping
ruclips.net/video/_SBkl3b2ZOs/видео.html
Curious. Knowing/expecting I'd be making many more, I'd at least built tooling to hold 2. Chuck the material for the 2 lowers, throw that in the mill while chucking 2 uppers in the other tool. Finish lowers #1 operation, pull the tooling, load the upper and run it's #1. While it's running, reorient or move over to #2 tooling for the lower.
FYI, the quantity of the parts on Xometry will autogenerate for more than 100. You have to select other and type in any quantity.
We've had to do various one-off/prototype parts for aircraft manufacturers on a 6 metre, 6-axis mill. Some of the prices would make your eyes water for these, but on a production run it drops massively. Also to show how daft some companies are, we had to do a spare part for an aircraft that went out of production a few years back. When in production they were made 5 per billet (3m x 1m x 75mm billet) and cost around $20,000 for the 5 parts. They just wanted 1 part though even though they could have the other 4 for future spares. Paid full price for that 1 part. CNC machining is a funny world
Reminds me of when I needed a stepper motor to replace a piece of lab equipment. The previous generation had them available for $200 bucks. They didn't sell them for the new model. I found a company in china that could make them with a minimum order of 100. The cost? $2 each. Seriously. My boss said "but we dont need 100" and sent the equipment back to the manufacturer for repair. They charged us 2500 dollars and replaced the motor. In retrospect, I should have asked them if they could charge me for 100 and throw 90 of them in the trash. "They said they will sell us 10 for 400 dollars!" Hed probably have gone for it.
RUclips algorithm brought me here and I am thankful. Thank you for sharing. You have no idea how much this means to us who knows little about machining costs.
Nice but when making soft jaws you could just make it to the parts size and comp it till it drops in and no need to pick up another offset
anytime I machine 1 or 2 parts its time and material, for most jobs I mount 3 double lock vises for 6 to 12 parts at a time , for higher production make a fixture and remember for high abrasive material you may need diamond coated cutters
Thanks for great video. Have you considered your time invested into machining the part on your own in workshop into the cost analysis? I mean often can happen that you think about how to make the part cheaper, not realizing that for example two hours of your time as an aerospace engineer is actually the cost of the part if you take the first offer available. For prototyping in this case of course. I have this kind of dilema often.
He only seemed to mention the cost of material... But then there is the machine and upkeep, the shop space, and time like you said. If its a hobby of yours then maybe its time well spent because you are enjoying yourself.. Thats worth a lot right there
Also, it will be more expensive from a small shop versus a large one. Small shops don't keep much raw material on hand and don't get as good of prices on material as a volume shop can get. They can have older CNCs that aren't in the best condition, that makes hitting those +/- .001 - .0005 tolerances much harder to get.
Love the video! People might love it more if you, if not but a few times in the beginning, show more of the aircraft throughout each video. Help people keep the end in mind, the context for each part, and the big picture progress!
I would have ran it about the same but with a few exceptions. I would have installed an expanding plug in the lower half that was in the soft jaws to keep the bore round while tightened in the vice. I’d use vice handle with a torque setting for repeatability. I’d run the bore undersize first so I could measure and correct for shift because it’s not a perfect world. Real world in a good machine, .001 true position between bore halves. Need it closer and rounder?leave .003 stock and hone to size. 7075 was the best aluminum alloy choice for fast, accurate machining.
Very cool guys! The one thing you didn't mention that I would be very interested in a detailed description was how much did it cost you in total to do those two prototype parts and please break down in every area as if you were prototyping for a customer such as Part Design Cad Time (software used) , material cost , cutter path programming time (what software used), machining time for both parts , cad design time for soft jaws , machining time for same and inspection deburring ,finishing time as if you were delivering to a customer. I think most will be shocked by the high numbers of prototype development. This will show the true cost of developing these two parts.Thanks for sharing that site for instant quote as I will definitely use that to experiment with some of my cad files.
I do cnc field service, rural machine shops dont have outside signs, farmers come in and thing they can get the part cheaper than john deere
I love your videos. I support you from Argentina. The country where you would never had a company like this one.
why?
How they are converting this cad model into the language that the CNC machine understands. Like g codes ??
Thanks for the video, really really helpful. I’m currently designing an almost identical shock bottom mount for a car and have been considering carbon forging, versus welding two plates to a pipe, vs outsourced CNC machining. I need 4 of them, and works out about $100 a piece from quotes I’ve had online. So sounds similar ballpark to yours when you factor in volume. I was curious as to the factors that made up the cost, including things like machining time and number of setups/passes. I was actually surprised that removing some of the ‘nice but not essential’ details that I could hand-add myself after the fact didn’t change the price, so added them back in again!
Amazing video! Liked and subscribed. What about the cost and quality of the new service of pcbway of cnc machining?
How do you know where exactly to place the part in the clamp? IE: If you place the part 20mm to the left or right, how does it not cut/mill it out of spec? I love watching these but when I see pieces being flipped multiple times I often wonder how things aren't getting messed up. Almost like a jig where you could only put a piece in one way, that's almost what I am expecting to see. (sorry for the silly question)
Love the videos. If I could just suggest one thing. When you are editing your videos, be sure to put them into some sound software that can visualise the sound frequencies. There are some really high pitched whines in your videos (which is of course expected in your environment) it's just people like me with young ears it can make videos unbearable to watch. You should be able to really easily filter out with a low pass filter on and take out the 15-20khz+ sounds
What are the odds this part will fit/function as planned? As with the rest of this project, I'm taking the "WILL" side. Great work!!!
Whether it will fit or not depends on your tolerances. If it's a part for your high end gear you can be sure the company that made the parts have their own standards, which also includes quality control. There are tools for that control: specially machined and "ground" calibrated parts - rectangular or oval in shape, for example. Oftentimes clients do their own quality control. So it all boils down to tolerances :) hope it answers your question!
@@viliusmarcinkevicius4747 Hi,dear friend,have contact information in the video ruclips.net/video/_SBkl3b2ZOs/видео.html
Good job, but one recommendation, you should profile the whole part depth in the previous op to avoid the blend/step line. Or try a large ball end mill profile if necessary.
Agreed! Thanks for watching and the feedback! 🙂
Have you ever tried Plethora for CNC machining? They have a more robust uploader, and actually make parts themselves instead of further outsourcing
Set up and fixturing is the biggest expense on any multipart job. Optimizing tool paths and roughing is where the time is saved. Manual tool change vs automatic is a tenfold time savings. That pecking drill retraction speed and distance optimization could have saved you a lot of time, for example. I learned (taught myself) CNC when there were no CADCAM programs (IBM 386 days), only a calculator and a drawing. Machine and fixture rigidity and repeatability will save you a lot of time, money and frustration. Fun stuff. :D
Nice demonstration. Why you do have to manually flip the piece around for each ‘op’? Shouldn’t the machine be able to do that automatically as part of the process? And what happens to all the aluminum waste/cuttings? Can they be collected and recycled back into aluminum ingots for use in future jobs?
Curious as to what stock material and where you get it? It's not like you go to Home Depot and get a big chunk of material like that.
Trick with cnc machining is to get your quote expensive enough that it becomes cheaper to buy your own cnc machine
Without getting too in depth regarding cost with CNC machining, die casting and surface finishing, is there a way to roughly work these out to get within a good rough estimate category to initiate negotiations with a vendor when looking at their initial proposal which shows a breakdown of components?
I would love to see a cost work up of this part redesigned in a 6000 series alloy and manufactured via welding two 2D profiled ears onto a piece of tubing. Even if the main bore needs to be reamed afterwards, it should cost about 20% of the fully CNC'd part you described.
Hi,dear friend,have contact information in the video ruclips.net/video/_SBkl3b2ZOs/видео.html
I think that would be cheaper, but maybe not as good a solution for an aircraft part. More inspection and failure points, reduced strength in the weld zone, and you'd probably have to bore the tubing out to get the fit they wanted. But if it were for a car? Yeah, switch it to plain carbon steel, make it out of tubing and some water jet cut ears and it would be way cheaper, stronger and more fatigue resistant than the aluminum part, and not much heavier.
Very nice, it’s nice to see something a little more challenging on a three axis machine.
400 to 600 for a 1 time job is about normal for those 2 parts. Most of that cost is writing the programs, figuring out the order of operations, making fixturing, etc. If it was a regular production part with proper tooling and optimized programs already made to speedily cut the part, about 10% of that would be about right. A typical 80 dollar/hour machine price should see about 15-20 or so of those things made in an 8 hour shift, plus material cost of 7075 aluminum. If you guys make a lot of smallish aluminum parts like that, a cheap 5 axis machine like a 3 axis with a trunnion added on with a dovetail attachment for instance could speed it up even faster. If there are lots of machine shops in your area, a used Haas + 2 axis trunnion can probably be had for around 100k.
I'll add to Apollolux's statement:
Setup Time * Machine Rate / Run Quantity
#Operators * Labor Rate / Pieces per Hour
Machine Rate / Pieces per Hour
Material
Components/Outsourcing
Packaging
Scrap %
Efficiency Factor
Markup%
Possibly factoring in any other inspection that goes above and beyond typical
it would be nice if you cast the part or form the part, finish the tolerances, then case harden the material. since it's aluminum, at volume, it would cost less, improve strength and increase durability
You need the add on micro arc 4th axis for the tormach
Nice video, great info. Try quoting with fictiv, better and cheaper.
now i have some experience with xometry i can offer advice .. When you order parts for cnc machine work , save a duplicate of that order as a quote.. What happens is , you get the parts, sell em over a month or so and go back to order more, Because you didnt save it as a quote , you get a new quote.. In my case , the same exact parts went up 260% in price from december 26th till today , feb 25..Dont delete your old quotes, and always make a duplicate quote before you place an order.
The old quote wont be valid anymore anyways. Xometry has a time limit that quotes are valid for. You can't** use the same quote from 9 months ago, material costs change, available shops ready to make them, etc.
Edit** misspelled
@@mecrob9852 the prices did drop back down after the chinese new year.. The quotes are held for a certain amount of time i dont recall , but youre right 90 days later they wont honor them
As a manufacturer. We did business with some - (competition) of Xometry, but not Xometry itself, so I am curious how Xometry works. We noticed a significant price drop to the manufacturing side, so low to a point it wasnt even close to being profitable anymore. I tought, some prices where very unfair and its all on a take it or leave it bases... So we decided to - leave it.
I think those websites do a great job, but I also noticed a great risk. Because what if you invest a great deal in extra capacity and those website just drop the prices like no tomorrow and all that work just goes to low cost countries in eastern Europe or Asia.
I felt that - there was no benefit. - AND - I felt the risk to do a great deal of business with them is just to big. How do you feel about this?
Good quick review, but you need to consider machinery, consumables, labor, and repair costs rather than just how much the bulk material is.
Interesting you say for in house machining the only cost is material. Is there no labor, overhead, & burden?
I was hoping for a true cost for y’all to machine a part. Such as material cost, amortized tool cost, and labor cost.
Nathan, once we get things more dialed in for production we will likely do a video going into those types of details. Thanks for watching!
Yea, even accounting for their own time / labor would have been nice. This is basic business practice, I'd argue, they haven't really explored this properly... It might be easy cheaper to do this outsourced when factoring in time, labor costs, tooling upkeep and opportunity costs
Yes. It was CLICK BAIT to label this with anything like "true cost" in the title. This was merely a quick run-through of one "instant quote" bit of software.
the one offs are definetly spot on . It really is that much more expensive to make a prototype . 50+ is another story .
And You will get "F OFF" quotas too when trying to get a quote on a part that You need one or two of.
@@MindBlowerWTF no surprises there , i'd do the same
What kind of endmills are you using? Also software? If you use variable geometry endmills or high speeds and feeds with low feed per tooth with a trochoidal tool path your tormach could do it with less strain on the spindle/drive. Also I would suggest from personal usage that you should buy some short insert drills to define the initial shape of the bore in one stroke
Another informative & interesting video. Well done! How do your in-house machine time/costs compare to Xometry?
If you want to make the most of CNC machining, consider making the parts manually. If you know how to effectively make parts manually, you can accelerate the process with CNC.
--- A great example is firearms. Simple slots, pockets, surfacing, and holes.
-- Another great example is cylinder heads for GM V8's. Deck the casting, drill & tap holes in XY to fixed depth, chamfer, flip the part, locate from the drilled/tapped holes onto an angled fixture, Drill the valve guides, bore for the valve seats, Station 2, heat the head and install the valve seats. Re-locate the part back onto the angled fixture, surface the valve seats, flycut the mating surface.
-- Bad example : Non-circular curved surface with a mirror finish. Molds for plastic parts. Lots of points in XY that change the tool deflection and cut quality.
-- If you're into Welded parts, check out Precision Tube Laser. They laser cut steel tubing and L-section. Tubular structures have not been very feasible until now. The old way was to stamp holes in sheet metal, then fold it into the tubing. For tube frames, the old way was to make fixtures and notch the parts in batches with a milling machine. Laser cut weldments are much more repeatable. CNC plasma is also good for larger thicker pieces.
When I make fishing molds the vents are .0005" high. Sometimes .001 just isn't enough.
Where do you get your steel stock? Any good suppliers you recommend? Thanks
One cost US$400 while cost US$40, that your thumbnail said. As far as I notice, to make combustion engine parts high compression ratio need more steel rather than Aluminium 7075. I just don't get clear message which cheaper between CNC or die casting, just get idea that CNC is future 4.0 which need material lost. Btw I like this kind of video.
would it possible to machine that piece "dry" without emulsion?
Do the costs include shipping? Thank you.
Just a thought, but longer term, that would be a great extrusion profile part. Since the outside is less critical, extrude that profile and then do a light finish machining for the bore and bolt hole, cut to length. Part cost would drop a fair bit.... It does help if you are running 2500 to 5000lbs worth of parts... extrusion weight. Just something to keep in mind for overall costs... Right now, extrusion cost is cheaper than sheet aluminum.
And, IIRC extrusion also improves material properties in the direction of the grain?
I'm a little concerned about have such a high cyclic load component such as the landing gear, made of aluminum, which has very poor fatigue characteristics and is often difficult to predict service life in such a situation, as every landing is a different load cycle situation, effectively. Obviously it can be beefed up as needed, but converting to (ideally) high strength steel in the future is probably not an option due to weight.
thanks for doing these videos, I'm glad you don't overhype it and just show what's going on
Are those saw marks on your finished piece?
Have to check if you commit to a batch of 1000 parts, will Xometry let you inspect the first few that come off the line....contract sticking points.
You could also have just one process if you used a cnc lathe wich has two chucks (automatic chuck swap) and c-axis milling option.
How much are one of those
@@Mackensp99 easily around 100k
The way i'd do it, given you have the mill long enough, is add +3mm in stock height, machine full part height to eliminate the blend (along with necessary holes etc), then put in in soft jaws and finish what you need! I think it'd be faster and more labor effective, though to each his own! Cheers!
Great idea, hold it on a small/short dovetail in dovetail jaws, finish the bore in second op. for minimal distortion.
Having multiple jigs and presets allows faster run times and less setup without having to dial in every time.
Did DarkAero purchase the Tormach or lease. The 1100MX is about $25k, yes? That is a factor in your in house cost for parts... beyond raw stock, then there is electricity and other supplies.
so what your saying is that i should get machining equipment and learn how to machine to replace the parts on my future farm equipment......
I APPROVE!
Can you list the time you spent making these parts , including creating your CAM files, fixtures & run time of the machine. Just as a guess , I will say you spent more than 10 hours on the 2 parts you made.
I think that part is siutable to cast, then you just bore out the holes and mill the slot the shock goes inside.
Who makes the toolholder rack on the wall at the start of the video?
There's another way to have done this job, why not just rough And finish it from the one side and then go straight to the soft jaws? Also I might be mistaken but that end mill looks like it could have completed that hole to depth from 1 side, so there would have been no need to stress about it not lining up on the 2nd set up or if you picked the roughed hole up properly. I only saw 2 setups ... maybe 3 if you had to machine the slot with no radius in the corners. Also i see there are clearance holes on the side so thats another setup
Great video, Wish i lived somewhere material was so cheap half the time i can't even get scrap stuff for that cheap.
The catch is you are still using shop time and wear/tear on your machines it does bring cost way down but can quickly add back up if you include design time.
moral of the story everyone should have 3d printers + CNC machines haha
Great video. I don't work for a shop but know I get crazy looks when I tell people how much a part will cost to get made at the shop down the street. Just curious, do you not value your own time? You say it only costs you material but not really. You have a significant amount of personal time in this. It looks like you have at least 4 or more setups in that part. This said, the first step in making the part cheaper is to reduce the number of setups. I can see making this in 2 setups with no soft jaws. I'm not certain where your critical dims are but its possible. Obviously you can't dictate how another shop makes it but when making it yourself you can reduce your own time invested.
You mist a point in your cost comparison, how much did it cost you to do it in-house?
It is not only your raw material, your time is worth something. While you do those, you are not working on something else that might be more worthy of being made in-house and pushing the deadline. You also have wear on the tool and machine. You need to know your shop time cost to better calculate/compare.
You don't only outsource for parts outside your capabilities, you also outsource for parts that you don't have time or would not be cost worthy to do in-house.
Anyhow, great video!
+/-.001"? That's a big tolerance from where I worked. I was doing OD grinds with a normal tolerance of +0/-.0005", so a callout for +/-.001" was considered easy work.
your cost is highly overprice because of extra complicity of manufacturing
you can manufacture quickly and much more efficient that you made
I was thinking the same.
@@Svenne1981 ruclips.net/video/_SBkl3b2ZOs/видео.html
This is so cool... I have been a partner for xometry for 4 years now but I had no clue how the customer side of it looked or worked. It's weird when my work and youtube hobbies meet....
btw please let me make some 5 axis part (for freeeezies) for you guys so I can put it on my youtube channel.... all my XOM and other work has NDAs so I can't show the machining
@EngineeringScience Thank you and thanks for checking out the video! Send us an email at info@darkaero.com and we can send you a CAD file for a 5-axis part we are working on. :)
@@DarkAeroInc Sent, looking forward to this
I love this!!! Good luck you all.
Not much of a cnc guy yet but I think its really cool. Planning on becomming a tig welder :)
Good content.
Do you guys bid on jobs somewhere? Is there a central dispatch for small cnc jobs somewhere? Whats the name of that site? Thanks