Great to feel that I'm walking Tokyo again with you, a month after my workshop there, and glad to see that the 35 1.4 is working for you. I got some great shots with the Viltrox 27 1.2 on my Fuji that day Anyone on the fence about joining Lakasz, you will not be disappointed.
Thanks Eric!! Yeah, that was a fun walk around Shibuya! We had a nice time comparing the lenses live. That was a few weeks after Axel and I shot this video so it was a funny coincidence. :)
Cheers for the video, stellar camerawork by Axel and some shots that had quite a bit of atmosphere. It's kind of nice to look at a shot you took and think about(within the confines of what the video shows us) how I would've framed the same shot, for instance, going portrait mode on the liquor store and just focusing on the samurai, the bike and the crates. Gives at least 5-10% of the experience, which means a lot to me.
Thank you!! Yeah Axel really shined in this one! Glad you enjoy the way we shoot these things. Actually, I did also take a portrait shot of the samurai liquor store but I guess I didn't show it for some reason. :)
In reality, this is the comparison I didn't know that I needed! I have this Viltrox 27 and the Nikon z 40mm (on a Z6III) and I am now pondering if I should sell the Viltrox and buy this Nikon 35. Another option of course, would be to buy instead the Nikon 50 f1.4. Yet another option would be to wait for the VILTROX LAB SERIES f1.2 lenses coming mid 2025. Keep up the good work!
Glad it gave you something to think about! In the end I've been using the Nikon 35 the most. It's a great lens for the price. I still have the Viltrox but don't use it much. I'm looking forward to the lab series. I never heard of that before! :)
Great stuff as always fellas. What do you folks look for when considering a spot to add to the map? Like what qualifies a spot to get added and what might be a factor that doesn't quite cut it? I'm curious about the general elements or ideas that kind of trigger you to start working a scene in your style. ✌️
Thank you!! The spots on the map have to be kind of 'self explanatory' with the one or two example pictures that we include in the map. Also, they should be something that's repeatable and related to the physical location (not just a cool photo taken at that location but not likely to ever happen again).
You're correct about the eye see's scenario, people always say it's X mm but the thing is and the way i read it is that that is for a single eye perspective and if i remember correctly 43mm is the equivalent to 1 of our eyes field of view. But you can probably calculate it from this, each individual eye has a horizontal FOV of about 135 degrees and a vertical FOV of just over 180 degrees.
Yeah, that makes sense. But I think our vision works so differently from cameras that the comparison is kind of a moot point. It's fun to think about but has little practical value for photography, in my opinion.
Appreciate that you’ve traded yours in, but it does seem a bit odd that I can’t find a dedicated comparison of the 40mm 2.0 and the 35mm 1.4. Most reviewers compare it with the 35mm 1.8S lens - not a lens I have, while a lot of Zf owners will have the 40.
100% I'm in the same place. Personally looking into that comparison as I am getting the Zf and thinking which one of those two lenses to get first.. I think 40mm is fast enough and it's super compact (as I travel a lot and looking for low-light street photography lens). While for sharper images I will get the S lenses later on. But yeah I'm still thinking.
Yeah, I didn't think about that before I traded it in haha. But I can say this from using both lenses extensively: the 35mm is superior in all regards, except size and cost. The additional stop of light is very useful. The lens is sharper wide open (even with the larger aperture) and if felt that AF is more accurate/faster. So, to me, it was a complete upgrade. :)
I want this lens and I have a question…I recently got a Nikon Zf and I'm looking to aquire a second backup body, that's affordable and takes my Z mount lenses. Honestly, I’m leaning towards the Nikon Z5, but with the recent price drops the Z6ii is not much more and is appealing also. Nearly everyone I've spoken to who actually owns a Z6ii (or Z5), LOVES it. I love my Zf, but I want something that will act as a more ergonomic and compact backup, with similar menus. I shoot portraits and headshots and an occasional family session or engagement. Some street. No events, sports or wildlife. I don't need massive speed, and I don’t plan on doing video with this backup. I played with a Z5 and a Z6ii in the camera store recently and they both felt really nimble and great to use. In use, I couldn’t really tell much difference between the Z5 and Z6ii. Both really nice. Would you recommend the Z5 or Z6ii as a backup to my Zf? If I get the Z5 I can afford more glass (like the 35!), but maybe the better body is a wiser choice?
Well, I think you answered it for yourself. If you didn't feel a difference (especially in the AF) then get the Z5. I do think the Z6II has a better sensor for low light but that many not really apply to you and isn't the most important thing anyway. :)
Excellent comparison and analysis. I have the 35mm f/1.8 S which is quite excellent, but would also like something faster. The Viltrox looks very good, but at just over 41mm it's too close to my 50mm f/1.2 S for me to justify getting it. My wallet is glad Nikon haven't done a 35mm f/1.2 S...
Thank you!! Glad you found it useful! I haven't had a chance to try to the 35mm 1.8 but I understand it's sharper and more accurate but has a more modern bokeh style compared to the 1.4. As for the 1.2... 🤫
Great video and comparison. I have the viltrox 27 f1.2 for fuji and love it and i am considering the nikkor 35 f1.4 for my nikon zf. I think when they talk about focal length closed to what the human eye sees its ment in perspective more then angle of view, we con see in a more wide angle fashion because but the perspective is like a 40ish mm focal length, I think
Thanks! I'm not sure what you mean though as perspective refers to the position when you are looking from, while field of view refers to how much you can see vertically and horizontally. Lenses only affect FOV, not perspective, which is only affected by where you are looking from (you position). Anyway, the point I was making is that it's really an apples to oranges comparison as we see in a very different way than cameras capture light to create 2D images. :)
Esoteric theme, w/a few gems. Eye field of view can, IMO, differ from preferred field of attention - something to consider in choosing f/l. Cool chef pics. Helpful focus tip. Host chases after guy in “locker room” for special pic😂. Nice. Image comparisons would have been more effective, IMO, as side by side instead of consecutive photos. Go here. No, wait, go there; no, go .....😊 Cheers!
Oh my, I love the character of this lens. I used to take similar shots on my Leica M10 + Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f1.4! That lens has a very similar character to this one but is a manual lens and has a bit of too soft looking rendering to me. Later switched to Sony with a 35mm f1.4 GM which I love but it lacks a bit of that vintage / nostalgic character this lens seems to offer. Whoa, maybe I should just pull the trigger on a Nikon Zf and that lens.
The effective aperture on the Viltrox is really 1.8 though, not in terms of light gathering but in DoF. It's still a nice lens though, although I'm not ready to give up that much resolution tbh
You're right in terms of DOF, but I care much more about light gathering. Bokeh is cool on both lenses, so it's fine either way. However, I do feel the 35 has a more 'retro' style bokeh. I think the Viltrox is a bit shaper and bokeh is nice, but not as creamy. In the end I've been shooting with the 35mm mainly. It just feels right haha. :)
I agree! We shot this a few months ago, and overall, the Nikon does have a nice vintage feel. It's not perfectly sharp all the time, but the viiiiiibes.... :)
WOW, I have same experience and philosophy on 40 vs 35, did you notice better 3D pop micro contrast with Viltrox ? I found it "blah" stopped down after F1.2 ?
Yeah, the micropop is there wide open but not as nice as my old Voigtlander 40mm f/2. That lens had awesmoe pop for a 500 dollar lens. The Nikon 35 is pretty good, too, but my favorite 3D pop lens these days is the Nikon 28mm f/1.4. I really hope Nikon updates this with a Z mount version some day! :)
Would you consider the Sony 1.4 35mm or Sigma 35 contemporary f/2 using a megadap adapter? I just like that they are small and have an aperture ring and can still af well but I don’t like that the adapter isn’t weather sealed.
I've never tried them! It's something I might experiment with. But for now, I am pretty happy with the Nikon 35mm and have chosen it over the Viltrox. :)
I never really paid attention, and on the street it's not noticeable at all, but I just tried in a quiet room and yes, there is a slight sound. But it's pretty subtle.
I traded it because I like f/1.4 over f/2. I shoot at night a lot and often use 1/500 shutter, so the extra light helps. As for Viltrox, I didn't mention it in this video (but did in the video we did about this lens) but I got it from Viltrox for review. I'm pretty stingy and do not suffer from GAS so I raaaaaaarely buy lenses. But if some company sends us one for free, then why not? :)
Yeah, maybe I sounded like I hate it in the video, but actually I don't mind it. It can be totally off, but even then colors can be very interesting. In general, when I start photography I was annoyed by 'wrong' colors but now I accept what comes as long as it's aesthetically pleasing. :)
Street photographer 101 tip of the day. The holy grail of tips is that when you want to get candid shots and look inconspicuous I would advise against a z9. Of course unless your shooting from a distance or if your 6 foot 5. 😂
Super nice video 👍🏻 I’m liking the look of the 35mm f1.4 and have been thinking about getting it for my Z8, but got a little worried about the autofocus accuracy… is it very unreliable, or compared to something like the Z 24-70mm f2.8? 🫣
Overall, it's fine. I haven't done an side by side comparison with the 24-70 but just have a feeling the pro lens is better. But it could be my brain playing tricks on me. I do also put the 35mm (or any lens really) into some very tough situation (shooting through glass, reflections, at night, wide open, moving subject, etc.). And in general, I am totally pleased with the sharpness and focus accuracy of the lens.
Great to feel that I'm walking Tokyo again with you, a month after my workshop there, and glad to see that the 35 1.4 is working for you. I got some great shots with the Viltrox 27 1.2 on my Fuji that day Anyone on the fence about joining Lakasz, you will not be disappointed.
Thanks Eric!! Yeah, that was a fun walk around Shibuya! We had a nice time comparing the lenses live. That was a few weeks after Axel and I shot this video so it was a funny coincidence. :)
Cheers for the video, stellar camerawork by Axel and some shots that had quite a bit of atmosphere. It's kind of nice to look at a shot you took and think about(within the confines of what the video shows us) how I would've framed the same shot, for instance, going portrait mode on the liquor store and just focusing on the samurai, the bike and the crates. Gives at least 5-10% of the experience, which means a lot to me.
Thank you!! Yeah Axel really shined in this one! Glad you enjoy the way we shoot these things. Actually, I did also take a portrait shot of the samurai liquor store but I guess I didn't show it for some reason. :)
In reality, this is the comparison I didn't know that I needed!
I have this Viltrox 27 and the Nikon z 40mm (on a Z6III) and I am now pondering if I should sell the Viltrox and buy this Nikon 35. Another option of course, would be to buy instead the Nikon 50 f1.4. Yet another option would be to wait for the VILTROX LAB SERIES f1.2 lenses coming mid 2025. Keep up the good work!
Glad it gave you something to think about! In the end I've been using the Nikon 35 the most. It's a great lens for the price. I still have the Viltrox but don't use it much. I'm looking forward to the lab series. I never heard of that before! :)
Is the 35mm 1.4 is sharper than the 40f2? I think the 40 is soft till it gets to 2.5 or so.
Yes, definitely sharper at f/2 and I would say even wide open, but I never did a pixel-peeping comparison, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. :)
I remember shooting the 40mm F2 and indeed it mostly needed to be opened at F2.5 to get sharper photos…
I am begging you to make these videos more regularly 🤣they're so awesome
I hear ya! I wish we could post once a week. But you'll be happy to know the next video is coming this weekend. :)
Urban paradise. Great scenes everywhere.
It really is! :)
Nice shots!
Thanks!! :)
Great stuff as always fellas. What do you folks look for when considering a spot to add to the map? Like what qualifies a spot to get added and what might be a factor that doesn't quite cut it? I'm curious about the general elements or ideas that kind of trigger you to start working a scene in your style. ✌️
Thank you!! The spots on the map have to be kind of 'self explanatory' with the one or two example pictures that we include in the map. Also, they should be something that's repeatable and related to the physical location (not just a cool photo taken at that location but not likely to ever happen again).
You're correct about the eye see's scenario, people always say it's X mm but the thing is and the way i read it is that that is for a single eye perspective and if i remember correctly 43mm is the equivalent to 1 of our eyes field of view. But you can probably calculate it from this, each individual eye has a horizontal FOV of about 135 degrees and a vertical FOV of just over 180 degrees.
Yeah, that makes sense. But I think our vision works so differently from cameras that the comparison is kind of a moot point. It's fun to think about but has little practical value for photography, in my opinion.
another fantastic video!
Thank you so much!! :)
I have used dx35/1.8g before, and now z35/1.4 is also my first 35mm lens. I am also considering selling my 40mm/2, but I really miss its lightness.
Yeah, 40mm was nice and nifty, but really the 35mm is much better. :)
Appreciate that you’ve traded yours in, but it does seem a bit odd that I can’t find a dedicated comparison of the 40mm 2.0 and the 35mm 1.4. Most reviewers compare it with the 35mm 1.8S lens - not a lens I have, while a lot of Zf owners will have the 40.
100% I'm in the same place. Personally looking into that comparison as I am getting the Zf and thinking which one of those two lenses to get first..
I think 40mm is fast enough and it's super compact (as I travel a lot and looking for low-light street photography lens). While for sharper images I will get the S lenses later on.
But yeah I'm still thinking.
Yeah, I didn't think about that before I traded it in haha. But I can say this from using both lenses extensively: the 35mm is superior in all regards, except size and cost. The additional stop of light is very useful. The lens is sharper wide open (even with the larger aperture) and if felt that AF is more accurate/faster. So, to me, it was a complete upgrade. :)
If size and cost are not major issues I would 100% get the 35mm. :)
@@EYExploreThanks for your impressions, very helpful.
@@EYExplorethe 35mm 1.4 is sharper than the 40? I think the 40 is soft till it gets to 2.5 or so.
I want this lens and I have a question…I recently got a Nikon Zf and I'm looking to aquire a second backup body, that's affordable and takes my Z mount lenses. Honestly, I’m leaning towards the Nikon Z5, but with the recent price drops the Z6ii is not much more and is appealing also. Nearly everyone I've spoken to who actually owns a Z6ii (or Z5), LOVES it. I love my Zf, but I want something that will act as a more ergonomic and compact backup, with similar menus. I shoot portraits and headshots and an occasional family session or engagement. Some street. No events, sports or wildlife. I don't need massive speed, and I don’t plan on doing video with this backup. I played with a Z5 and a Z6ii in the camera store recently and they both felt really nimble and great to use. In use, I couldn’t really tell much difference between the Z5 and Z6ii. Both really nice.
Would you recommend the Z5 or Z6ii as a backup to my Zf? If I get the Z5 I can afford more glass (like the 35!), but maybe the better body is a wiser choice?
Well, I think you answered it for yourself. If you didn't feel a difference (especially in the AF) then get the Z5. I do think the Z6II has a better sensor for low light but that many not really apply to you and isn't the most important thing anyway. :)
Very awesomw as usual. Keep it going. God bless you and have a nice day.
Thank you so much!! :)
@ You are welcome, keep ip the great teaching and photos.
I really can’t wait to book my workshop with you for this coming January 🎉
I look forward to it as well! :)
Excellent comparison and analysis. I have the 35mm f/1.8 S which is quite excellent, but would also like something faster. The Viltrox looks very good, but at just over 41mm it's too close to my 50mm f/1.2 S for me to justify getting it. My wallet is glad Nikon haven't done a 35mm f/1.2 S...
Thank you!! Glad you found it useful! I haven't had a chance to try to the 35mm 1.8 but I understand it's sharper and more accurate but has a more modern bokeh style compared to the 1.4. As for the 1.2... 🤫
Great video and comparison. I have the viltrox 27 f1.2 for fuji and love it and i am considering the nikkor 35 f1.4 for my nikon zf. I think when they talk about focal length closed to what the human eye sees its ment in perspective more then angle of view, we con see in a more wide angle fashion because but the perspective is like a 40ish mm focal length, I think
Thanks! I'm not sure what you mean though as perspective refers to the position when you are looking from, while field of view refers to how much you can see vertically and horizontally. Lenses only affect FOV, not perspective, which is only affected by where you are looking from (you position). Anyway, the point I was making is that it's really an apples to oranges comparison as we see in a very different way than cameras capture light to create 2D images. :)
Esoteric theme, w/a few gems. Eye field of view can, IMO, differ from preferred field of attention - something to consider in choosing f/l. Cool chef pics. Helpful focus tip. Host chases after guy in “locker room” for special pic😂. Nice. Image comparisons would have been more effective, IMO, as side by side instead of consecutive photos. Go here. No, wait, go there; no, go .....😊 Cheers!
Thanks!! Glad you enjoyed all of those little moments. Yeah, maybe a side by side would be good, you're right! Next time! :)
Oh my, I love the character of this lens. I used to take similar shots on my Leica M10 + Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f1.4! That lens has a very similar character to this one but is a manual lens and has a bit of too soft looking rendering to me. Later switched to Sony with a 35mm f1.4 GM which I love but it lacks a bit of that vintage / nostalgic character this lens seems to offer. Whoa, maybe I should just pull the trigger on a Nikon Zf and that lens.
Yeah I love it too! After shooting this video, I've basically gone with the 35 full time on the camera haha. :)
@@EYExplorePlease upload more with that lens!
@@g33k3301 We will! :)
Quick comment to help the algorithm. Left my full comment on Patreon.
Thank you so much!! :)
The effective aperture on the Viltrox is really 1.8 though, not in terms of light gathering but in DoF. It's still a nice lens though, although I'm not ready to give up that much resolution tbh
You're right in terms of DOF, but I care much more about light gathering. Bokeh is cool on both lenses, so it's fine either way. However, I do feel the 35 has a more 'retro' style bokeh. I think the Viltrox is a bit shaper and bokeh is nice, but not as creamy. In the end I've been shooting with the 35mm mainly. It just feels right haha. :)
Great comparison actually, I feel that the viltrox is sharper while sacrificing 3d pop! The nikon 35mm's bokeh look more vintage to my eyes
I agree! We shot this a few months ago, and overall, the Nikon does have a nice vintage feel. It's not perfectly sharp all the time, but the viiiiiibes.... :)
WOW, I have same experience and philosophy on 40 vs 35, did you notice better 3D pop micro contrast with Viltrox ? I found it "blah" stopped down after F1.2 ?
Yeah, the micropop is there wide open but not as nice as my old Voigtlander 40mm f/2. That lens had awesmoe pop for a 500 dollar lens. The Nikon 35 is pretty good, too, but my favorite 3D pop lens these days is the Nikon 28mm f/1.4. I really hope Nikon updates this with a Z mount version some day! :)
Would you consider the Sony 1.4 35mm or Sigma 35 contemporary f/2 using a megadap adapter? I just like that they are small and have an aperture ring and can still af well but I don’t like that the adapter isn’t weather sealed.
I've never tried them! It's something I might experiment with. But for now, I am pretty happy with the Nikon 35mm and have chosen it over the Viltrox. :)
@ that makes sense. It’s the better choice from those two.
Does the STM in that 35mm 1.4 make a noticeable noise when focusing ?
I never really paid attention, and on the street it's not noticeable at all, but I just tried in a quiet room and yes, there is a slight sound. But it's pretty subtle.
@ thanks
Thanks!
Thanks for watching! :)
Compare it with the Sigma Art 35mm 1.4
If I can get one for free. I don't really go out of my way to compare lenses. I'm happy with the 35 though. It's great! :)
That would be a great comparison. They can be found for about 250$
40mm is a real nice focal length, how come you traded it in?? Also why aren’t you using a full frame Viltrox like their 40mm lens for Z mount?
I traded it because I like f/1.4 over f/2. I shoot at night a lot and often use 1/500 shutter, so the extra light helps. As for Viltrox, I didn't mention it in this video (but did in the video we did about this lens) but I got it from Viltrox for review. I'm pretty stingy and do not suffer from GAS so I raaaaaaarely buy lenses. But if some company sends us one for free, then why not? :)
Flourescent lights wont be around forever. Its all LEDs soon. SO may as well catch the odd lighting in photos while you can.
Yeah, maybe I sounded like I hate it in the video, but actually I don't mind it. It can be totally off, but even then colors can be very interesting. In general, when I start photography I was annoyed by 'wrong' colors but now I accept what comes as long as it's aesthetically pleasing. :)
@@EYExplore Yeah, and it certainly can be annoying when it does that weird syncing thing with your sensor and ya get a banded image.
@@rtpwyk Luckily, the banding this doesn't happen on the Z9. On other cameras, I would avoid using the electronic shutter to avoid the banding. :)
Street photographer 101 tip of the day. The holy grail of tips is that when you want to get candid shots and look inconspicuous I would advise against a z9. Of course unless your shooting from a distance or if your 6 foot 5. 😂
Funny, I've been using large cameras for 15 years and have plenty of candid photos. Maybe I'm invisible. :)
@ I think it’s just me being self conscious with my old Nikon D3s tank 😂 I might have to work on my confidence.
@@bespokecustomstudio1565 Go for it! I used a D3 for like 5 years! Then a D4, then a Z6II and now a Z9. I love huge cameras. :)
池袋西口のみずき通り近辺にチャイニーズマフィアがいるから、デカいカメラ持ってアチコチ目立って写真撮るのは気を付けた方が良いよ
それにシャッタースピードか速い
スナップ撮るならIBIS使って、SS1/125で充分
いずれにしても、池袋東口は安全だけど、池袋西口は危険度が増すから注意が必要
実は、僕は池袋西口１１年ぐらい住んでいた。この近辺詳しいです。この１１年写真いっぱい取っていた。問題全然ありません。
1/500シャッタスピードは、IBIS関係ない。時々歩き人を取ってます。この時は速いスピード必要です。
すみません、僕は日本語下手です。
Super nice video 👍🏻
I’m liking the look of the 35mm f1.4 and have been thinking about getting it for my Z8, but got a little worried about the autofocus accuracy… is it very unreliable, or compared to something like the Z 24-70mm f2.8? 🫣
Overall, it's fine. I haven't done an side by side comparison with the 24-70 but just have a feeling the pro lens is better. But it could be my brain playing tricks on me. I do also put the 35mm (or any lens really) into some very tough situation (shooting through glass, reflections, at night, wide open, moving subject, etc.). And in general, I am totally pleased with the sharpness and focus accuracy of the lens.
@ Ahh, great! Thank you for responding 😃
Zastanawiam sie czemu zawsze chodzisz z dodatkowa bateria wmontowana w body. Zupelnoe wystarcza ci zwykla bateria do tych filmow napewno. 😅
Nie rozumiem. Nikon Z9 ma tylko jedną baterię.
Out of the camera brand the Nikon F1.4 are the best value, Canon are 3X more expensive.
Yeah, it's a great lens for the price! :)
My 35mm is 97% accurate with my Z8.
Nice! How did you determined that specific percentage haha? :)
boooooring.....
:)