I'll bet all those wealthy UWS residents wouldn't be so quick to share their private playgrounds with the NYCHA kids if they had such a thing. Let's be real. As much as I hate to say this but it's time to build a fence and add a lock that only residents have a key to. All these luxury apartment buildings have private amenities for residents only. Public housing residents should have something nice too.
Im not trying to be an asshole here... But Central Park is literally 2 blocks east and Riverside Park is 2 blocks west of the playground.... We seriously are having a problem finding open park space????
This is funded by tax payer dollars, not the residents. So everyone which is the public, payed for this to be build and maintained. Do you pay taxes? 🤷🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
@@kittenpawsbb it is private property and the park is for the residents , just like the public isnt allowed to go in and use the machines in the laundry room or use their garbage bins or park in the garage . If the building decided to put in a pool or a tennis court it would also not be open for public use . Who they get paid from is absolutely irrelevant , they work for their money , they earned it , what they do with THEIR money is THEIR business . What they spend THEIR money on does not belong to the public . smdh
@@shari9721 All of them get paid by tax payer dollars. Management and residents, maybe then should refuse the money funded to them by the tax payers. Do you pay taxes?🤦🏽♀️
The housing project FINALLY gets something new & they stilllll can't enjoy it . Selfish people who have EVERYTHING want what little the poor folks have . # Selfish # entitled 🤬
If those high end people need space for their children than buy one of those empty lots and build one. Stop thinking you are entitled to things that you keep the less fortunate from being entitled to.
The entitlement of the wealthy UWS residents. Are you kidding me. Three beautiful parks in the UWS, River park, Central park and I forgot the other one. Let Nycha residents finally enjoy something nice that belongs to them. This should not even be an issue. It's already hard for residents living in public housing and they cant afford to live somewhere nicer. Wise Tower Residents we see you and we stand with you 💯 Where do I sign a possible petition?
I'm with the Wise Tower residents on this one. If you don't live there, you shouldn't be bringing your children to that playground especially since the outsiders feel they have the right to take it over and push the residents out of the way. If one of those fancy privately owned buildings renovated their playground, would they be okay with the NYCHA residents using it? I think not! Well off people feel they should have access to EVERYTHING but wouldn't think twice about denying access to someone less fortunate.
How pathetic do you gotta be to act this way towards children ? It shoudnt matter wether they live or dont live in that complex they have the rights to play in that park. No kid should be denied those rights . We gotta learn to share and be kind with one another .
@@sugarhilllo9914 That playground is not for everyone, it's for the people who live there and that's according to the property management company that manages that building. Again, if one of those fancy private buildings updated their playground, would they be okay with NYCHA residents using it? No! This is another example of priviledged people feeling they should have a right to everything. They are trying to take over an area that is not theirs. Their children need to understand that they don't always get what they want. Especially since there are other playgrounds they can play at.
Don’t you see the difference between resident, who actually paid for something to be private. Which is typically gated off. Then it being funded by tax payer’s dollars. The management works for NYCHA, the resident in the neighborhood pay their taxes. Which in turn, helped paid for this park to be build and maintained. 🤷🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
@@kittenpawsbb I see a certain demographic deciding they want something and just taking it. Had they not tried to push out the Wise Tower residents this wouldn't be an issue. The management company built the playground for the residents. The management company doesn't want nonresident using the playground. Thus, the outsiders should use the other parks available to them. These are people who feel like no one should ever tell them no. Well those NYCHA residents have probably been told no all their lives. They finally get something nice, and a certain demographic wants it. The answer is no. Let's be honest, certain people are upset that poor NYCHA residents got something nice and don't feel they deserve it. They have a city full of parks at their disposal but they just gotta have their precious children play at this one. If they hadn't tried to take it over and push the Wise Tower residents out, this wouldn't be an issue but they couldn't help themselves
@@queenbee4350 They actually haven’t been told no, they have everything handed to them. Food, shelter, clothing and now a park, all paid for by tax payer dollars. NYCHA management collects their salary from who again? It’s public, until the buildings are privately owned and the residents pay out of their pocket. I wouldn’t hold my breath.
This isn’t even a gated community, where the residents pay for their parks. This was funded by tax payers. So everyone in the surrounding neighborhoods, help fund this park. They should be allowed to use the park too.
@@kittenpawsbb Tax payer funded areas can still have restricted access. Under NY law if you don't have permission to be in public housing you can be charged with trespassing. The sign clearly says the park is for residents only.
@@jefflewis4 This isn’t inside the building. This is outside, and it was funding with tax payer dollars. NYCHA management gets paid by who? Until this is privately owned, and paid for by the residents, like a gated community. This is in a public place, funded by the public. Do you pay taxes? 🤔
@@kittenpawsbb it is private property and the park is for the residents only , just like the laundry room , the garage and the garbage bins are . Those residents are also tax payers . Who management gets paid by is irrelevant , they work , they earn that money , it is THEIR money .
@@kittenpawsbb Its the entire property, not just the buildings. Your tax payer funded logic is faulty. This is property although owned by the government is private property. The private Trinity School across the street made an agreement with the company that manages the property for their students to use the park during recess. Because its private property. If it was public property no such agreement would have been needed.
That’s too bad. Restricting non residents from accessing the new fancy playground. What a shame. And who allocated the funding for this playground renovation, the building management, the council member or parks and recreation?
Upper West Siders who feel their taxpaying dollars went towards the NYCHA Park; yet have access to Balcony rooftops/pools/park areas on PRIVATE property, that WISE Towers Residents don't..unless they are invited/escorted by friends/family of tenants. I do empathize with the WISE Towers Tenants who have something nice, only to be harassed for using their own park. Overall, I'd like to see UWS Residents & Wise Tower Residents share the Park together, but feels like pie in the sky.
@@ashanean ‘Wisw Tower’?? ‘West Side perks’?? Wise Tower Residents could use the other parks on the property and let UWS Residents have full access to their newly constructed park? Is that what you’re insinuating? And why..when it was developed in partnership for them? Where did I say Wise Residents don’t pay taxes?
Wise houses got a lot of old ppl living there it’s a small housing project that park is not big enough for everybody to be in Central Park is literally down the block literally a 8 minute walk and guess what…it’s open for the public!!! 😃
This dispute also seems to be happening because the city isn’t investing enough tax dollars into renovating public parks throughout the city. Maybe if they raised taxes on the super wealthy who live there, cut the nearly $6 billion they spend on NYPD who do nothing but harass homeless people and teenagers, they could put millions into renovations for all the parks in NYC. That would lead to more longterm jobs for care and maintenance, and ensure everyone in every neighborhood has a great public playground to enjoy.
"...911 this large lady with the navy blue hat looked at myself and the children I'm with in a threatening manner...I fear for my safety...can you please send help.." Doesn't take much.
@@BlimpCityFeederThank you. People forget money talks and if you're the nanny for these rich families that live in brownstones you have way more influence than a angry resident. No more Jamaican or Puerto Rican nannies cuz baby the way they were all Ukrainian / European🐸 ☕
@@lauren6509 Can't lie; some of the skinfolk nannies (with the $3 wigs) would probably smile, make that slow walk and then tell their employer to make the phone calls.
While i agree it should be for residents. Also NYCHA gets 2.4 billion or 58% of its budget from federal taxpayers and another 750mil from the city taxpayers. Out of a budget of $4.2 billion. So is it really a "private" playground if its funded by taxpayer dollars?
I tell him to "kick off your shoes and relax your feet" (aw, baby) Party on down to the Xscape beat, just kick it😂😂😂 Just kick it (just kick it), just kick it
There's should be respect for the residents period ....but all children should be welcome to play at the new playground ...that what it built for, there should be no rules for little kids to play at for Kiddie fun ...😅
Cool, now can I tell those who live in the projects to stay in their playgrounds and stop coming up to the ones in Westchester? Noooo, can’t do that, that would be racist! But people WHO ACTUALLY PAY TAXES taking their kids to the playground at the projects that was built using THEIR money? No no no, not allowed 🚫. What a joke.
You sound stupid Mr racist if you pay taxes and you do not live in the projects as you are trying to point out to put down the people who live there , only reason you mentioned taxes . Then why would you want to take your kid anywhere near the projects playgrounds . Obviously you live in a better neighborhood in Westchester right let your kids play where it's safe ! Trust me you don't want your kids playing in the projects you and your kid would get robbed , they love ppl talking that I pay taxes 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@jeanghrey Oh I know, that couple in the beginning of the video with their daughter looked so menacing. “Oh, there’s Nannie’s who bring the children they babysit here”, give me a break. This is the same territorial garbage that public housing residents play ALL the time. Newsflash, YOU pay nothing for that apartment. YOU paid nothing towards that new playground. YOU pipe down and go back to enjoying your luxury vehicles that you can shockingly afford that fill up the resident parking lots, EVERYONE sees through the game.
Yes, and management of NYCHA said they paid out their own pockets. But ultimately where does the money come from, that pays their salary? I agree, this is a public park.
How pathetic do you gotta be to act this way towards children ? It shoudnt matter wether they live or dont live in that complex they have the rights to play in that park. No kid should be denied those rights . We gotta learn to share and be kind with one another .
@@peter320vn we talking about a park not a house or apartment . Of course i wont allow anyone but my family and friends inside as thats my own private space and i choose to make use of it how i want to . Now if i did own an apartment complex with a playgrund i would allow everyone to enjoy the space . Lol yall keep forgetting that if NYCHA is private property they still are situated in areas where the public is easily accesible .
1:29 NO!, NYCHA campuses are in fact NOT private property, especially their parks. As long as New York City taxpayers are funding these new parks, they are public to everyone.
Nope, you're just plain wrong. Its not a public park, its a private park on a complex owned by the city managed by a private company. Which is why they are allowed to put up fences and signs that restrict access to the residents.
A park operated and maintained by TAXPAYERS is a PUBLIC park. Especially if that park is located in the middle of a taxpayer funded complex where taxpayers are subsidizing the rents of the residents of said complex.
@@michaelcastro1470 Nope, this park and the entire Wise housing complex is taxpayer funded 'private property'. The management company is within their right to restrict access to the property to residents only.
That’s cute… Doesn’t change the fact that taxpayers are still subsidizing the rents of those tenants who are calming ownership over that taxpayer funded park. Want a park to yourself? give up your taxpayer funded NYCHA dwelling and move into a private complex where you have to pay a full rent that goes to funding a private park within that complex. Then those residents will have every right to deny entry to outsiders.
@@michaelcastro1470 The resident only signs are still there, the housing authority has confirmed its private property restricted to residents only. Up until Recently the Trinity school which is right across the street from the park had an agreement with the management company for their students to use the park during recess and for some classes. They needed that agreement because the park and the entire housing complex is private property. You can argue all you want about taxpayer funding etc , you'll still be completely wrong. This is a public housing complex that is 'private property' where access can be restricted to residents only.
Ummm tax payers who live in the surrounding neighborhoods should have access to the playground too. Are they kidding by putting a restriction. This isn’t a gated community, where the residents payed for this to be build and maintained.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Bigger In Texas [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QxTkZTLWdo4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Diggy Graves - Red Vineyard [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8Ro085T0mnQ/mqdefault.jpg)
The solution is to leave the tower residents alone let them have their park.
I'll bet all those wealthy UWS residents wouldn't be so quick to share their private playgrounds with the NYCHA kids if they had such a thing. Let's be real. As much as I hate to say this but it's time to build a fence and add a lock that only residents have a key to. All these luxury apartment buildings have private amenities for residents only. Public housing residents should have something nice too.
Im not trying to be an asshole here... But Central Park is literally 2 blocks east and Riverside Park is 2 blocks west of the playground.... We seriously are having a problem finding open park space????
If the wealthy residents want a nicer playground, go lobby their local representatives to renovate their own outdated play structures.
They can just pay for it themselves.
How ridiculous. Many places come with amenities and facilities just for residents. It's not a public playground.
This is funded by tax payer dollars, not the residents. So everyone which is the public, payed for this to be build and maintained. Do you pay taxes? 🤷🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
@@cherylhardy8418Yes building management use their own private funds. So the building Managers for NYCHA, get their pay from whom again? 🤔
@@kittenpawsbb it is private property and the park is for the residents , just like the public isnt allowed to go in and use the machines in the laundry room or use their garbage bins or park in the garage . If the building decided to put in a pool or a tennis court it would also not be open for public use .
Who they get paid from is absolutely irrelevant , they work for their money , they earned it , what they do with THEIR money is THEIR business . What they spend THEIR money on does not belong to the public .
smdh
@@shari9721 All of them get paid by tax payer dollars. Management and residents, maybe then should refuse the money funded to them by the tax payers. Do you pay taxes?🤦🏽♀️
This is public housing. The residents are not paying their full share. Typical, poor people behavior .
Same thing with pools. If a pool belongs to a building, it’s only for the residents. That’s why they have all those extra fees as tenants
Why In the world would it be shared!????? It belongs to the people who live in the building… get over it.
If you want to know who should be able to use a playground, don’t ask the adults. Ask the kids. I promise you the kids will have better answers.
And the kids would say everyone, which is the wrong answer
Ironic . Look who's saying, " it should be shared ." 😂 Any other time " That's our pool , they don't live here ." # typical # HYPOCRITES
Exactly!!
These people would go absolutly insane if nycha kids went to their private park.
The housing project FINALLY gets something new & they stilllll can't enjoy it . Selfish people who have EVERYTHING want what little the poor folks have . # Selfish # entitled 🤬
Poor people cost a lot of money. Who do you think pays for their supplemental income?
If those high end people need space for their children than buy one of those empty lots and build one. Stop thinking you are entitled to things that you keep the less fortunate from being entitled to.
The entitlement of the wealthy UWS residents. Are you kidding me. Three beautiful parks in the UWS, River park, Central park and I forgot the other one. Let Nycha residents finally enjoy something nice that belongs to them. This should not even be an issue. It's already hard for residents living in public housing and they cant afford to live somewhere nicer. Wise Tower Residents we see you and we stand with you 💯
Where do I sign a possible petition?
Adults fighting over a playground in 2024 how embarrassing. 🤦♂️
Embarrassing yet on par for where humanity is. Sigh
I'm with the Wise Tower residents on this one. If you don't live there, you shouldn't be bringing your children to that playground especially since the outsiders feel they have the right to take it over and push the residents out of the way. If one of those fancy privately owned buildings renovated their playground, would they be okay with the NYCHA residents using it? I think not! Well off people feel they should have access to EVERYTHING but wouldn't think twice about denying access to someone less fortunate.
How pathetic do you gotta be to act this way towards children ? It shoudnt matter wether they live or dont live in that complex they have the rights to play in that park. No kid should be denied those rights . We gotta learn to share and be kind with one another .
@@sugarhilllo9914 That playground is not for everyone, it's for the people who live there and that's according to the property management company that manages that building. Again, if one of those fancy private buildings updated their playground, would they be okay with NYCHA residents using it? No! This is another example of priviledged people feeling they should have a right to everything. They are trying to take over an area that is not theirs. Their children need to understand that they don't always get what they want. Especially since there are other playgrounds they can play at.
Don’t you see the difference between resident, who actually paid for something to be private. Which is typically gated off. Then it being funded by tax payer’s dollars. The management works for NYCHA, the resident in the neighborhood pay their taxes. Which in turn, helped paid for this park to be build and maintained. 🤷🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
@@kittenpawsbb I see a certain demographic deciding they want something and just taking it. Had they not tried to push out the Wise Tower residents this wouldn't be an issue. The management company built the playground for the residents. The management company doesn't want nonresident using the playground. Thus, the outsiders should use the other parks available to them. These are people who feel like no one should ever tell them no. Well those NYCHA residents have probably been told no all their lives. They finally get something nice, and a certain demographic wants it. The answer is no. Let's be honest, certain people are upset that poor NYCHA residents got something nice and don't feel they deserve it. They have a city full of parks at their disposal but they just gotta have their precious children play at this one. If they hadn't tried to take it over and push the Wise Tower residents out, this wouldn't be an issue but they couldn't help themselves
@@queenbee4350 They actually haven’t been told no, they have everything handed to them. Food, shelter, clothing and now a park, all paid for by tax payer dollars. NYCHA management collects their salary from who again? It’s public, until the buildings are privately owned and the residents pay out of their pocket. I wouldn’t hold my breath.
we all know how it would be if it was the other way around
So If my neighbors pool isnt being used, I can just go over there and use it? GTFOH
I think kids should play anywhere but it’s just like going to a rich neighborhood what’s the first thing they ask? DO YOU LIVE HERE ?
This isn’t even a gated community, where the residents pay for their parks. This was funded by tax payers. So everyone in the surrounding neighborhoods, help fund this park. They should be allowed to use the park too.
@@kittenpawsbb Tax payer funded areas can still have restricted access. Under NY law if you don't have permission to be in public housing you can be charged with trespassing. The sign clearly says the park is for residents only.
@@jefflewis4 This isn’t inside the building. This is outside, and it was funding with tax payer dollars. NYCHA management gets paid by who? Until this is privately owned, and paid for by the residents, like a gated community. This is in a public place, funded by the public. Do you pay taxes? 🤔
@@kittenpawsbb it is private property and the park is for the residents only , just like the laundry room , the garage and the garbage bins are . Those residents are also tax payers .
Who management gets paid by is irrelevant , they work , they earn that money , it is THEIR money .
@@kittenpawsbb Its the entire property, not just the buildings. Your tax payer funded logic is faulty. This is property although owned by the government is private property. The private Trinity School across the street made an agreement with the company that manages
the property for their students to use the park during recess. Because its private property.
If it was public property no such agreement would have been needed.
For residence only, not public…..
I swear ppl cannot read
That’s too bad. Restricting non residents from accessing the new fancy playground. What a shame. And who allocated the funding for this playground renovation, the building management, the council member or parks and recreation?
Easy. Just put a code box only residents have and change regularly.
Upper West Siders who feel their taxpaying dollars went towards the NYCHA Park; yet have access to Balcony rooftops/pools/park areas on PRIVATE property, that WISE Towers Residents don't..unless they are invited/escorted by friends/family of tenants. I do empathize with the WISE Towers Tenants who have something nice, only to be harassed for using their own park. Overall, I'd like to see UWS Residents & Wise Tower Residents share the Park together, but feels like pie in the sky.
Can the Wisw Tower residents use the other West Side perks that go along with their properties?! So disrespectful. And they do pay taxes too.
@@ashanean ‘Wisw Tower’?? ‘West Side perks’?? Wise Tower Residents could use the other parks on the property and let UWS Residents have full access to their newly constructed park? Is that what you’re insinuating? And why..when it was developed in partnership for them? Where did I say Wise Residents don’t pay taxes?
Someone in City Planning pocketed some money to sell off that parcel of NYCHA playground to a private developer.
Can't these poor people have anything for themselves? Go find another park to take your Master's children to
These people are richer than you. Do you pay taxes? 🤔
If the public funded it, the public should have access
I atteded St. Gregory's and grew up there we played there forever and a day. Time sure changes things
I bet you the wkthy residents had nothing to do with the renovations. They didn't push for renovations.
Wise houses got a lot of old ppl living there it’s a small housing project that park is not big enough for everybody to be in Central Park is literally down the block literally a 8 minute walk and guess what…it’s open for the public!!! 😃
I mean it's for The Wise towers through Mitchell Llama it should of been section off
They just don’t want their kids playing with Nycha kids. They should take their kids out there and record it. Post it online.
That's a small park. How much Adams pocketed?
Pathetic. The people who initiated the building of this oasis knew dam good and well this would happen.
That playground looks horrific
DON'T COME!!! You're are NOT welcome!
Maybe, but the White Folks want to use it and take it over. . And when White People get to "White peopling" Woe onto Non Whites
This is the 2nd time parks are being frought for. Fix up the other parks
This dispute also seems to be happening because the city isn’t investing enough tax dollars into renovating public parks throughout the city. Maybe if they raised taxes on the super wealthy who live there, cut the nearly $6 billion they spend on NYPD who do nothing but harass homeless people and teenagers, they could put millions into renovations for all the parks in NYC. That would lead to more longterm jobs for care and maintenance, and ensure everyone in every neighborhood has a great public playground to enjoy.
It should only be used by the tenants and their guests.
Nanny kicked the residents out? I find that hard to believe.
"...911 this large lady with the navy blue hat looked at myself and the children I'm with in a threatening manner...I fear for my safety...can you please send help.." Doesn't take much.
@@BlimpCityFeederThank you. People forget money talks and if you're the nanny for these rich families that live in brownstones you have way more influence than a angry resident.
No more Jamaican or Puerto Rican nannies cuz baby the way they were all Ukrainian / European🐸 ☕
@@lauren6509 Can't lie; some of the skinfolk nannies (with the $3 wigs) would probably smile, make that slow walk and then tell their employer to make the phone calls.
I don't find it hard to believe. They used to do that in Barnes and Noble
Just share😂😅😂😅
I'm going to guess there's condominium in the area w/ a pool, can the residents of Wise Towers go take their kids to that pool? I bet not.
While i agree it should be for residents. Also NYCHA gets 2.4 billion or 58% of its budget from federal taxpayers and another 750mil from the city taxpayers. Out of a budget of $4.2 billion. So is it really a "private" playground if its funded by taxpayer dollars?
UnWise Playground
CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS
Make sure it's surrounded by armed security. Gun-free zone
They didn’t pay for it my tax dollars did they can play anywhere.
What about the laundry room? Can u go in there? Common areas?
Jim Crow Laws 2024☺
Thats awesome. Call the cops on them .
🤖 HR memo: ...>🚪..."Employees must wash hands after using the bathroom. (Ahem) Vanessa Murdock." Good bye
It's called the plaza
as long as there is no drinkiing smoking cursing outrageous behavior by adults i say let the kids play
White people playgrounds are private though.
Have you been to that area? They were better off leaving that park alone.
@@BxChef.207 That was before it became the nicest playground in the area, now everybody wants to go there.
Then the should be able to go to the residents places and play and hang out too.
WHY
"In public housing complex" what question is there? I am confused is it private or public? Or are the people wanting to get IN are non-POCs?
Its Public housing, but private property.
I tell him to "kick off your shoes and relax your feet" (aw, baby)
Party on down to the Xscape beat, just kick it😂😂😂
Just kick it (just kick it), just kick it
There's should be respect for the residents period ....but all children should be welcome to play at the new playground ...that what it built for, there should be no rules for little kids to play at for Kiddie fun ...😅
Would you say the same when the kids from those apartments go to pools that are for residents only ?? We alllll know you would say the opposite. 😞
@cocoace7587 ... all kids can swin at a public pool ...that a public playground not private ...stop reaching Sir ..👀
Rich people with nannies invade stolen land.
Tyrones & Laqueefas are so childish
Gofundmeisha
If they're smart they'll keep the real not fake,"most dangerous"out of the playground
i.e. Jamal & Tyree
ONLY CHILDREN HAVE THE RIGHT!!!!!
Cool, now can I tell those who live in the projects to stay in their playgrounds and stop coming up to the ones in Westchester? Noooo, can’t do that, that would be racist! But people WHO ACTUALLY PAY TAXES taking their kids to the playground at the projects that was built using THEIR money? No no no, not allowed 🚫. What a joke.
You sound stupid Mr racist if you pay taxes and you do not live in the projects as you are trying to point out to put down the people who live there , only reason you mentioned taxes . Then why would you want to take your kid anywhere near the projects playgrounds . Obviously you live in a better neighborhood in Westchester right let your kids play where it's safe ! Trust me you don't want your kids playing in the projects you and your kid would get robbed , they love ppl talking that I pay taxes 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You clearly didn’t listen, the outsiders behavior towards the actual residents stirred up the problem, which is typical for that demographic…
@@jeanghrey Bingo!
@@jeanghrey Oh I know, that couple in the beginning of the video with their daughter looked so menacing. “Oh, there’s Nannie’s who bring the children they babysit here”, give me a break. This is the same territorial garbage that public housing residents play ALL the time. Newsflash, YOU pay nothing for that apartment. YOU paid nothing towards that new playground. YOU pipe down and go back to enjoying your luxury vehicles that you can shockingly afford that fill up the resident parking lots, EVERYONE sees through the game.
Exactly 👍🏽👏🏽
At 1:09 minutes: Classic Madam: Marriage material, musing and *making improvements for the inner sole:* Shinanna Stevens. Words for the Wise.
Whyte Entitlement...
lol near a nycha? So its basically tax funded and its a public park too but they want to have restrictions on who can use it.
Yes, and management of NYCHA said they paid out their own pockets. But ultimately where does the money come from, that pays their salary? I agree, this is a public park.
How pathetic do you gotta be to act this way towards children ? It shoudnt matter wether they live or dont live in that complex they have the rights to play in that park. No kid should be denied those rights . We gotta learn to share and be kind with one another .
So is your house is open to the public? 😉
@@peter320vn we talking about a park not a house or apartment . Of course i wont allow anyone but my family and friends inside as thats my own private space and i choose to make use of it how i want to . Now if i did own an apartment complex with a playgrund i would allow everyone to enjoy the space . Lol yall keep forgetting that if NYCHA is private property they still are situated in areas where the public is easily accesible .
Yeah I've seen hundreds of private playgrounds where "colored" kids are not allowed, so yeah, an eye for an eye.
Yeah? What if it was a swimming pool with a lifeguard paid for by the building? Should s/he get paid to watch children who don’t live there?
How can a public housing complex have a private park?
Because the park is for the residents. If it were a public park it would be managed by the parks dept, not the housing authority.
Kids used to play together and take turns. 20 years ago this would be an opportunity.
1:29 NO!, NYCHA campuses are in fact NOT private property, especially their parks. As long as New York City taxpayers are funding these new parks, they are public to everyone.
Nope, you're just plain wrong. Its not a public park, its a private park on a complex owned by the city managed by a private company. Which is why they are allowed to put up fences and signs that restrict access to the residents.
A park operated and maintained by TAXPAYERS is a PUBLIC park. Especially if that park is located in the middle of a taxpayer funded complex where taxpayers are subsidizing the rents of the residents of said complex.
@@michaelcastro1470 Nope, this park and the entire Wise housing complex is taxpayer funded 'private property'. The management company is within their right to restrict access to the property to residents only.
That’s cute… Doesn’t change the fact that taxpayers are still subsidizing the rents of those tenants who are calming ownership over that taxpayer funded park.
Want a park to yourself? give up your taxpayer funded NYCHA dwelling and move into a private complex where you have to pay a full rent that goes to funding a private park within that complex. Then those residents will have every right to deny entry to outsiders.
@@michaelcastro1470 The resident only signs are still there, the housing authority has confirmed its private property restricted to residents only. Up until Recently the Trinity school which is right across the street from the park had an agreement with the management company for their students to use the park during recess and for some classes. They needed that agreement because the park and the entire housing complex is private property. You can argue all you want about taxpayer funding etc , you'll still be completely wrong. This is a public housing complex that is 'private property' where access can be restricted to residents only.
Clumsy analogies say more about a person’s intelligence than the way they speak.
The residents who live off of my tax money in their city subsidized housing
Share playgrounds period.
Ummm tax payers who live in the surrounding neighborhoods should have access to the playground too. Are they kidding by putting a restriction. This isn’t a gated community, where the residents payed for this to be build and maintained.
If it’s a public park then everyone should be able to use it.
Right, except its not a public park.
Ah yes, Americans fighting each other over a playground. Americans, they think the own everything
That's crazy it is for everybody!