Half a century ago, as a student, I had a landlord who was a lawyer and he put Equitable Estoppel in the lease. My cousin, who was in law school at the time, said he didn't understand why the landlord would do that. I figured that this was a throw away clause designed to intimidate. However, if the guy was really nasty, I now see why he wanted it. Ordinary disputes are common law, but egregious acts can claim equity. In this modern world, it is still possible to find disputes where there is no precedent. A claim in equity allows the judge to be a judge, not bound by rules that don't fit the circumstances. However, prior decisions may warn against this choice.
This is how RUclips gets you. You take a look thinking that you're going to get the same old, same old. And BAM, the algorithm actually brings you something that is interesting and beneficial for our personal knowledge base. Love it. And I love this channel. Thanks, I subscribed.
Cool stuff. Thanks. Going to watch again. So, are we still under the law of the high seas/Admiralty as our language suggests? And why does the flag which used to be red, white and blue in every court room, now have gold fringe surrounding it?
RUclips used to nail it on everything but they changed their algorithm to turn everyone that watches into brain dead morons and also content that is absolutely degenerative and making you dumber than before.
So , I'm working at my guitar amp repair shop and I'm looking at my old Gibson tube amp service manual and in the notes is a quote . " Someone who understands a subject should be able to explain it so everyone understands it . " { paraphrased ]
And the reason that Delaware has a separate court for equity is that the Delaware Court of Chancery is essentially the courts where corporations sue each other to develop corporate law.
As a lawyer who often sues for equitable remedies, it is shocking how few lawyers really understand equity. Many lawyers don't understand that equity doesn't have a cause of action (at least not anything like one for law). Standing for equitable jurisdiction is also an issue that I see a lot of judges mess up. Declaratory judgment can be either a prospective or a retrospective remedy! If you have been harmed in the past, you should be able to get declaratory judgment as to if your rights were violated. Likewise if you wish to do something in the future but your rights are threatened, you should be able to get declaratory judgment that declares what your rights in that future activity are. Injunctions are only a prospective remedy. They don't care if you were hurt before, except to the extent that provides evidence of future harm. Nominal damages is a legal remedy, not an equitable one, although its similar in many ways to the legal version of a declaratory judgment.
As someone who worked with the Ohio legislative staff to take voice dictation from representatives of Congress and put it into legal verbiage I was amazed at how ignorant, many lawyers are of the law.. they don’t even understand the bar association.. smh
I’m glad I sumbled on this. You’ve broke through my adhd and made it comprehensive enough to distract me from my conspiracy copper electro mind control nazis on the moon with Chester Cheeto playing in a Rush cover band in a bar somewhere on Tantooine.
Where courts of law and courts of equity have merged, the court has all the powers in equity. I would also note that there are equitable rights or equitable causes of action, e.g. breach of fiduciary duty, which confer equitable jurisdiction in addition to equitable remedies, e.g. specific performance. Finally, I would note that the impact of common law in the sense of prior decisions has the similar force in equity as it does in law. Of course there are treatises on equity most famously Pomeroy so any short video can’t do it justice. Pun intended. 😂
Could you tell us why bonds are attached to a case? Could you tell us why every case has a cusip number? Whathappens to the profits from the sale of those bonds onto the market? Does the judge have an equitable interest in the matter? How much of the profits go into the judges retirement account? Looking forwarf to the answers
It is my understanding that every 'thing' in commerce must be bonded/ insured for possible harm to the public. Read up on Securities and securitization. Hope that helps.
Seems he did not discuss people withdrawing their consent to be governed. When you do, it places you above ALL that with the exception of violations in natural law, which are inescapable.
Thank you, Bryan. I’m a new subscriber and absolutely appreciate the content. I’ve been up all night., so I will save this for my coffee when I wake. 🇺🇸🌹👍
Really cool. Noticed equity in contracts and legal language very early on. As a busness guy I inatly understood what it means, honesty and fairness and agreement, in actions and deeds. No one ever had to explain it to me. Equity is pretty much what sibling rivalry is all about....so in realty common law is really all about equity and always has been.
Can't wait for "Secret Hidden Court" to get taken out of context and become the conspiracy theory you warned it isn't. As a lay person with no legal background, this was an excellent overview and clears up a lot of questions about why the law is wishy-washy sometimes. Love it, and you are a great presenter.
If I remember my legal history thing the issue with equity courts is that they were basically a revenue generation mechanism so people could buy rights, so basically the modern equivalent of bribes.
My first exposure to this was at small claims court in California back in the 90's. Apparently, small claims in CA is a court of equity, not a court of law, and in small claims you do everything pro se without attorneys. As a layman, I didn't really understand what equity meant. I thought is just gave the judge a wider latitude to interpret the statutes. It's fascinating to know the history of this, and what the legal terminology actually means. Thank you for this video. Very educational.
Hmmm unfortunately after watching this video my understanding of what equity means matches your previous thought that it "just gave the judge a wider latitude to interpret the statutes"...
Our common law and equity courts have existed for a thousand years though. They predate the formation of the United States by quite a lot. We inherited the system directly from the Colonies, who got it from Great Britain - Except for Louisiana, which has a system based on the Napoleonic Code for historical reasons (ie the Louisiana Purchase - it was not originally a British colony). So the presenter of this video is entirely correct, and you are wrong. This is stuff that is taught in every law school, it is not just an opinion, it is factual history.
Common law has existed since the beginning of time.. it’s unwritten because it’s common sense.. if you owe a debt, or caused loss, injury or harm to your fellow man, you owe them fair and just compensation.. that’s all that is.. very simple.. not everyone knows how to read and write, another reason for common law..
Glad I watched this. I am being sued in my real estate business and I was wondering why the lawyer used laches when describing the statute of limitations.
Ah, this helps quite a bit to clarify some wooly ideas I had. Thanks! If you want to get those subs up maybe something like a Nady wireless lapel mic and a Logitech HD webcam would be worth a $120 investment. Really entry level but 80/20 rule. Regardless you're DOING IT so don't take this as criticism! I subbed as I value ideas far more than production value.
You are wrong on many levels. When they removed our ability to pay for anything with the emergency banking act, the laws also changed. They soon realized those changes gave the people to much power in equity, so in order to hide equity from the people they combined it with the civil court.equity makes you equal with the judge. All crime in the United States is commercial, with the emergency banking act law change all crime can be discharged in accordance with public law. You cannot contract by filing their forms , equity acts in personam, you have to bring equity yourself, a bar guild scumbag cannot bring it for you.
That really started with Theodor Hertzel. It was his idea to relocate jews from civilized Europe to Palestine. Arthur Balfour just wrote the letter to Walter Rothschild, who funded the move. The Declaration didn't include Arabs. Should've been a red flag, but nobody cared about the Middle East! They were viewed as peasants. Perfect place to begin a Zion outpost, and start plotting a global takeover! Lol sorry! It's kinda showing nowadays, and sinking America in the process. Someone will eventually have to hand over Netanyahu.
I remember seeing that clause in the Constitution but it never quite registered why the terms were there like that. Thanks for that history and clarification. You got a new follower. 😁
@@brynoDC I've had senior attorneys and law school instructors inform me that I'm an expert in U.S. Constitutional law, but I know I have more to learn. I'm right now trying to evaluate if your information is disruptive to my current legal models. I have a business partner who is a retired Federal prosecutor and law instructor, and he and I will discuss topics from time-to-time. You do a very good job of explaining stuff to a lay audience.
Subbed and liked because, though I could never do the work, the magical art of the law fascinates me. You lay it all out in clear narration with charts, so it's easily understood. BrynoDC, I wrote a book thirty years ago, long out of print now but still getting new readers. Is there a mailing address where I could send you a signed and inscribed copy?
i learned that my bankruptcy was filed with court of equity. but i still don't understand equity. the banks use the word a lot, but i never hear it in court cases.
I can now see how a lot of what has been a mystery is relevant. Equity creates and environment of fairness if the governing body has a moral contract with humanity
That's the theory, though in practice many US judges don't in fact know much about laws that they are supposed to adjudicate and equity allows some impunity for a judge to act purely based on personal bias, without being in accord with legal precedent.
i have many questions. can a jury be demanded by a defendant or plaintiff in equity? or does the judge have the final decision? is caselaw treated as discretionary in equity? is there a difference between a "jury trial" and a "trial by jury"?
The example you gave of a declarative judgment (i.e. "The contract is invalid.") looks like a declaratory judgment. (But certainly, a contract being invalid is a reason that a plaintiff might get zero dollars after suing for money damages.) Declaratory judgments are a remedy created by statute, which can be applied to cases where some other legal or equitable remedy is sought, designed to ascertain and fix the rights of the parties. IDK if declaratory judgments even fit into the framework of this topic. But I would want to steer farther away from the topic, when discussing judgments at law for damages or for no-damages. Also: a HUGE part of what courts in equity used to do when they were separate institutions - though not in the federal judiciary - was estate and family law. To the point that it seems weird to talk about specific performance, bankruptcy, and civil contempt in a commercial setting instead of, like a divorce or probate!
I used the Secretary of State in California over an election issue that was not covered by statute. I used at equity. This was in Sacramento Superior Court.
@@studyallthetimeallthetime8473 I prevailed. I used the magic words: there is no speedy and effective remedy. I wished to run for public office. I was a registered Green. I was the chair of the state wide platform committee. A small group of Greens filed for the right to pick and choose in what districts they would run candidates. A civil rights attorney, an ally, rushed me to the court house. I was unable to stop it, but was granted intervene status. This left me without pathway to run. The granting of a request from a group not authorized by the plenary by this judge had reduced a qualified party to a coffee klatch. I obtained a speedy court date and went in pro per. I was not asking for much. I asked for a writ of mandamus ordering the Secretary of State to allow me to run as an independent. They did object. However, those magic words rang true. The Court did issue the order, and I collected 14,000 signatures in my congressional district. This achievement was sited in a subsequent case in which a potential candidate claimed that three percent of the registered voters was impossible to meet. I came in a poor third, beaten by both major parties but ahead of all minor ones combined, producing no benefit to society. As the district was seventy percent Democratic, the usual scoundrel won. My Green detractor in Santa Barbara ran as a Green and caused a Republican victory. The Judge said " Next time get a lawyer." I don't think there will be a next time, but I grew my own lawyer; my daughter. But the elements were in place: irreparable harm, no other remedy, and an area not covered by statute. I used that as an excuse for why I did not have any points and authorities to present. I am quick on my feet with excuses. " Your Honor, there can be none as this situation is unique ". My strong advice is that a candidate should never run except in a major party primary. It didn't even work for Teddy Roosevelt.
Please, go into more depth. I too live in Sacramento. I am asking for a reason that I cannot go into because I still don't have enough information /facts to rely on to make a statement. Thank you
Great information and highly useful. I would point out something you seem to have missed and that is the emergence of territorial courts in the US where judges were granted a common law jurisdiction. These courts were not under the FRCP [Mookini v United States 303 US 201]. These tribunals still exist [EPA and Forest service tribunals for example]
Thank you. I have a problem with the family courts. According to your description, they are equity courts because there is no jury. I see your point about dividing a family, but I think this creates a judge who has the kind of power that a monarch would have. America's founders were against this kind of power, and so am I. It is an abusive system. Common law and juries can do the equity court if the disputes are broken down into small pieces. A big problem is that judges are instructing the jury, and this is wrong. Juries can decide against the law as easily as they can decide with the law. The judge did not create the law, so why is he telling juries what they can judge for themselves?
Lol... Delaware has a court of Chancellery that is moreso visible than other states. What he is speaking is universal in all states...court of kings conscience!
@@Erik-e2d3t Time is a flat circle. Infinite regressive recursion and infinite expansion are one in the same because conformal cyclic cosmology is the only truth. 🫠
I would argue that they eliminated the true common law (look up the historical definition of "court of record ") in favor of their version of equity. Which is that all property is owned by the State. The judge will decide if we have a small equitable interest or not.
I have listened once, will have to listen again and I appreciate your spelling all of this out. Dealing with a common law issue (equity?) currently, and have questions. I am certain I'll find an answer once I understand.
How would go about finding what building is for law and equity if they do not tell you, but from my observation bankrupty court seems best since American is usurp by another government called the United States
There are theologians that believe Satans little season began under the rein of King Henry the 7th.. or the Red Dragon era. Some also think it just ended with the recent Notre Dame ritual, or the portal deal? I would beg the differ..
There's a reason why lawyers used to be called devils advocates. Devils greatest trick he doesn't exist, how you disappear from the human consciousness you change your name!
I'm a layman and curious where the Crown Temple and the British Accredited Registry fit in all this considering the former was established in 1215, and the latter in the 1600's. Also, are all deeds just represented by color of law and a land patent is the official document of ownership?
except we are under admiralty law and every level of state and fed govt, dept, and agency is incorporated. we don't have common law anymore. look up gold fringe flag in flag rules. look up B.A.R association
No, they only had a few law ability to change land or equity especially because land is sought as commodity exchange and basic Republic only ..as in define re - public ..move some away to inhabit as owner is illegal conversion. The chance it's caught is higher than they want
Thank you for your video. I can tell you follow your curiosity. I am a follower as well. Bankruptcy and Family courts. Criminal and Civil courts. Please don't conflate two distinct courts. Many people, particularly young men need to understand the terms of the social contract. Equitable relief can be sought in any court of law. However there is a fundamental difference in administration and procedure between a court of law and a court of equity. whether.a judge has more flexibility? True enough. Dependent on the relief sought? Injunctive relief, restraining orders, in Courts of law. First, A court of Equity is formed outside Constitutional protections. The proceedings are not adversarial. Family Court,no jury, no right against self incrimination, no presumption of innocence, no right to an attorney, no due process. Nothing to do with a criminal case where the government is against the individual. A sacred oath of marriage is not a contract for goods and services. Hence no prenup agreements are binding on the parties or the court. It is not a civil dispute. Most importantly, the parties ask or petition the court for help. If a divorce plan is submitted with no unresolved issues between the parties, all things being equal, the court has no jurisdiction to do anything but approve the plan. No fault divorce is the rule because nobody got time for endless he said she said debates. No government is designed to deal with the marital problems of it's citizens. FFS, the self governed can't build enough courts and prisons for due process to function properly. The history of how the courts deal with child custody, and property has been reversed over the past centuries. That would be an interesting and informative video. As for Bankruptcy Court, again not an adversarial proceeding. Petitioners seek protection from the court and must have clean hands. Full disclosure of all assets, complete cooperation with the trustee and the court. No criminal law protections. Debts discharged dispite the objections of creditors. Are there Appeal courts for these courts of Equity? The history of law is important and interesting. Suggestions for legal topics. On religious practice. Polygymy. What is the state's compelling interest to prohibit a long standing religious practice? SCOTUS treated polygymy as bigamy. A crime due to elements of fraud. However if the multiple wives are informed consenting adults who is being harmed? Society at large? Idaho Religious Exemption. Every State requires the state coroner to certify the cause of death of any child. Why do religious adherents require an exemption for faith deaths of children, when faith healing fails? New sub for you ❤
Half a century ago, as a student, I had a landlord who was a lawyer and he put Equitable Estoppel in the lease. My cousin, who was in law school at the time, said he didn't understand why the landlord would do that. I figured that this was a throw away clause designed to intimidate. However, if the guy was really nasty, I now see why he wanted it. Ordinary disputes are common law, but egregious acts can claim equity. In this modern world, it is still possible to find disputes where there is no precedent. A claim in equity allows the judge to be a judge, not bound by rules that don't fit the circumstances. However, prior decisions may warn against this choice.
This is how RUclips gets you.
You take a look thinking that you're going to get the same old, same old. And BAM, the algorithm actually brings you something that is interesting and beneficial for our personal knowledge base. Love it.
And I love this channel. Thanks, I subscribed.
It’s like seeing a unicorn 🦄
@lauravastag8587
I needed this. Thanks 😊
Cool stuff. Thanks. Going to watch again. So, are we still under the law of the high seas/Admiralty as our language suggests? And why does the flag which used to be red, white and blue in every court room, now have gold fringe surrounding it?
RUclips used to nail it on everything but they changed their algorithm to turn everyone that watches into brain dead morons and also content that is absolutely degenerative and making you dumber than before.
@@rivegaucheranchit seems that's how they operate doesn't it !?
I learned more in 11 minutes than I did in school.
Thank you Sir!
One who understands a subject clearly is able to explain it simply. Thank you sir. Merry Christmas!
So , I'm working at my guitar amp repair shop and I'm looking at my old Gibson tube amp service manual and in the notes is a quote . " Someone who understands a subject should be able to explain it so everyone understands it . " { paraphrased ]
And the reason that Delaware has a separate court for equity is that the Delaware Court of Chancery is essentially the courts where corporations sue each other to develop corporate law.
It is more Corporate Governance suits typically derivative suits (shareholders suing the corporation's board on behalf of the corporation).
Ahhh. Like Teslas deal with Elon being chucked out was an equity case in their court of chancery?
As a lawyer who often sues for equitable remedies, it is shocking how few lawyers really understand equity. Many lawyers don't understand that equity doesn't have a cause of action (at least not anything like one for law). Standing for equitable jurisdiction is also an issue that I see a lot of judges mess up. Declaratory judgment can be either a prospective or a retrospective remedy! If you have been harmed in the past, you should be able to get declaratory judgment as to if your rights were violated. Likewise if you wish to do something in the future but your rights are threatened, you should be able to get declaratory judgment that declares what your rights in that future activity are. Injunctions are only a prospective remedy. They don't care if you were hurt before, except to the extent that provides evidence of future harm. Nominal damages is a legal remedy, not an equitable one, although its similar in many ways to the legal version of a declaratory judgment.
Would love to hear more of your thoughts
How can a lawyer stand foe equitable remedy for anyone? Equity must be brought in personum . Hiring a lawyer, deems you incompetent.
As someone who worked with the Ohio legislative staff to take voice dictation from representatives of Congress and put it into legal verbiage I was amazed at how ignorant, many lawyers are of the law.. they don’t even understand the bar association.. smh
@@terrybelden5442that’s what I was wondering- how can those sworn to the bar be in equity?
@@Ninsidhe they cannot they can only function at law, which is near the law, fake law color of law.
I’m glad I sumbled on this. You’ve broke through my adhd and made it comprehensive enough to distract me from my conspiracy copper electro mind control nazis on the moon with Chester Cheeto playing in a Rush cover band in a bar somewhere on Tantooine.
Didn’t get but it sounded cool hahaha
That shits true dude !
Just found ya! i am reading Gibson’s Suits in Chancery right now. Nerd? yeah, that’s me. Excellent stuff. Subscribed
Filing motions with the court is a commercial dis honor. You must stand in equity andnot recontract with them.
Thank you, I found our who was stealing rights from me from this video. You are appreciated my friend.
Sub'd within the 1st 2 min - I haven't heard of anyone talking/knowing about this for YEARS (since my mentors have died anyway).
Where courts of law and courts of equity have merged, the court has all the powers in equity. I would also note that there are equitable rights or equitable causes of action, e.g. breach of fiduciary duty, which confer equitable jurisdiction in addition to equitable remedies, e.g. specific performance. Finally, I would note that the impact of common law in the sense of prior decisions has the similar force in equity as it does in law. Of course there are treatises on equity most famously Pomeroy so any short video can’t do it justice. Pun intended. 😂
Would love to hear more of your thoughts
Joseph Story
For “we” the living are the beneficiaries and they the government officials are trustee’s.
Could you tell us why bonds are attached to a case?
Could you tell us why every case has a cusip number?
Whathappens to the profits from the sale of those bonds onto the market?
Does the judge have an equitable interest in the matter?
How much of the profits go into the judges retirement account?
Looking forwarf to the answers
This.
Look into securitization. That's the money, the bond is the insurance/surety.
It is my understanding that every 'thing' in commerce must be bonded/ insured for possible harm to the public. Read up on Securities and securitization. Hope that helps.
wouldn't he be breaking his oath to the BAR if he were to answer those extremely interesting questions WE ALL want to know the honest answers for ?
@onewiselady6412 would it be considered treason to take an oath to a foreign guild?
Great content!!!
Would you be able to provide more information in how to issue pleadings under equity for Specific Performance?
Equity is super important.
Seems he did not discuss people withdrawing their consent to be governed.
When you do, it places you above ALL that with the exception of violations in natural law, which are inescapable.
Final answer
❤yeah! Try telling Forsythe County GA you are a State Citizen. Get back to me.
@@theconsciousrn6489 first error "GA" is that tied to commercial territorial jurisdiction? As-king for a friend.
@ those were my stomping grounds back in the day. I don’t think there is anyone who is Sovereign but the Father
Gibsons treatise on this subject is a BEAUTIFUL read!
Joseph Story too... Youngest man to be placed on the Supreme Court! He was a law scholar and genius🎉
Thank you, Bryan. I’m a new subscriber and absolutely appreciate the content. I’ve been up all night., so I will save this for my coffee when I wake. 🇺🇸🌹👍
Fascinating stuff. Thanks for sharing
Thanks for watching!!
The Court of Equity, wow.
Really cool. Noticed equity in contracts and legal language very early on. As a busness guy I inatly understood what it means, honesty and fairness and agreement, in actions and deeds. No one ever had to explain it to me. Equity is pretty much what sibling rivalry is all about....so in realty common law is really all about equity and always has been.
Brilliant
I loved the simplicity of a well executed complicated matter
Proper bo selecta
Well done presentation on the evolution of equity and the evasiveness of equality that follows.
Can't wait for "Secret Hidden Court" to get taken out of context and become the conspiracy theory you warned it isn't.
As a lay person with no legal background, this was an excellent overview and clears up a lot of questions about why the law is wishy-washy sometimes. Love it, and you are a great presenter.
Bar Attourneys are the conspiracy.
If I remember my legal history thing the issue with equity courts is that they were basically a revenue generation mechanism so people could buy rights, so basically the modern equivalent of bribes.
My first exposure to this was at small claims court in California back in the 90's. Apparently, small claims in CA is a court of equity, not a court of law, and in small claims you do everything pro se without attorneys. As a layman, I didn't really understand what equity meant. I thought is just gave the judge a wider latitude to interpret the statutes. It's fascinating to know the history of this, and what the legal terminology actually means. Thank you for this video. Very educational.
Hmmm unfortunately after watching this video my understanding of what equity means matches your previous thought that it "just gave the judge a wider latitude to interpret the statutes"...
First things first, America has not existed for a thousands years. Its always good to start any conversation or thesis with a point based in truth.
Correct, I take it what he meant to express is that the courts of chancellory are older than a 1000 years.
Our common law and equity courts have existed for a thousand years though. They predate the formation of the United States by quite a lot. We inherited the system directly from the Colonies, who got it from Great Britain - Except for Louisiana, which has a system based on the Napoleonic Code for historical reasons (ie the Louisiana Purchase - it was not originally a British colony).
So the presenter of this video is entirely correct, and you are wrong. This is stuff that is taught in every law school, it is not just an opinion, it is factual history.
Common law has existed since the beginning of time.. it’s unwritten because it’s common sense.. if you owe a debt, or caused loss, injury or harm to your fellow man, you owe them fair and just compensation.. that’s all that is.. very simple.. not everyone knows how to read and write, another reason for common law..
Ok simpleton,here’s the deal.. he didn’t allude to America being a thousand years old. So don’t get your panties in a bunch.
@@AlexanderSupertramp142very good!
This will come in very handy thank you. Great work, sir.
Glad I watched this. I am being sued in my real estate business and I was wondering why the lawyer used laches when describing the statute of limitations.
Law and history are so interesting. Thank you so much for making this.
Wow, I had never heard about any of this, very interesting! Thank you!
Mississippi and Tennessee both have separate chancery courts.
as well as illinois
Much better seeing the hidden gems they swapped to rob imo. Almost perfection.
Thank you.
Merry Christmas.
This was very interesting and enlightening! Thank you.
UCC even defines remedy at 1-308, and fortified by 1-103.6. Tacit consent can be temporary.
Ah, this helps quite a bit to clarify some wooly ideas I had. Thanks!
If you want to get those subs up maybe something like a Nady wireless lapel mic and a Logitech HD webcam would be worth a $120 investment. Really entry level but 80/20 rule. Regardless you're DOING IT so don't take this as criticism! I subbed as I value ideas far more than production value.
in to hear this sir.
thank you sir.
Merci du partage! Stéph.
You are wrong on many levels. When they removed our ability to pay for anything with the emergency banking act, the laws also changed. They soon realized those changes gave the people to much power in equity, so in order to hide equity from the people they combined it with the civil court.equity makes you equal with the judge.
All crime in the United States is commercial, with the emergency banking act law change all crime can be discharged in accordance with public law.
You cannot contract by filing their forms , equity acts in personam, you have to bring equity yourself, a bar guild scumbag cannot bring it for you.
@@terrybelden5442 I agree but I also agree that even here equity (remedy) was given to the people. i.e. their ability to discharge a liability.
what videos do u recommend? I felt this guy was somewhat " off" being an attourny( to return to the crown).
Nice! Can you explain how to battle social security in federal courts, under trust law, eg. 15 USC sec 1
I kept looking to see if I set this video on two times speed.
Thank you for this great info. Can you please review the BALFOUR AGREEMENT as a special. Thank you.
That really started with Theodor Hertzel. It was his idea to relocate jews from civilized Europe to Palestine. Arthur Balfour just wrote the letter to Walter Rothschild, who funded the move. The Declaration didn't include Arabs. Should've been a red flag, but nobody cared about the Middle East! They were viewed as peasants. Perfect place to begin a Zion outpost, and start plotting a global takeover! Lol sorry! It's kinda showing nowadays, and sinking America in the process. Someone will eventually have to hand over Netanyahu.
as different from the balfour declaration?
Thanks for speaking out.
I remember seeing that clause in the Constitution but it never quite registered why the terms were there like that. Thanks for that history and clarification. You got a new follower. 😁
I’m so glad you liked it!
@@brynoDC I've had senior attorneys and law school instructors inform me that I'm an expert in U.S. Constitutional law, but I know I have more to learn. I'm right now trying to evaluate if your information is disruptive to my current legal models. I have a business partner who is a retired Federal prosecutor and law instructor, and he and I will discuss topics from time-to-time. You do a very good job of explaining stuff to a lay audience.
Very informative - Thanks for doing the work!
Can you do a video on Civil Asset Forfeiture? This is a terrible situation of government theft in most states. What can be done to eliminate it?
Subbed and liked because, though I could never do the work, the magical art of the law fascinates me. You lay it all out in clear narration with charts, so it's easily understood. BrynoDC, I wrote a book thirty years ago, long out of print now but still getting new readers. Is there a mailing address where I could send you a signed and inscribed copy?
Could I buy a copy???
i learned that my bankruptcy was filed with court of equity. but i still don't understand equity. the banks use the word a lot, but i never hear it in court cases.
Thanks for sharing!
Would a foreclosure case be in equity? How could a defendant use the equity court to their benefit?
foreclosure from a bank is theft snd fraud.
Have you ever heard of or come across the term “exclusive equity”?
I can now see how a lot of what has been a mystery is relevant. Equity creates and environment of fairness if the governing body has a moral contract with humanity
That's the theory, though in practice many US judges don't in fact know much about laws that they are supposed to adjudicate and equity allows some impunity for a judge to act purely based on personal bias, without being in accord with legal precedent.
i have many questions. can a jury be demanded by a defendant or plaintiff in equity? or does the judge have the final decision? is caselaw treated as discretionary in equity? is there a difference between a "jury trial" and a "trial by jury"?
New subscriber all for the truth!
Does this work in Canada all provinces?
Thank you for sharing. Subbed 👍
The example you gave of a declarative judgment (i.e. "The contract is invalid.") looks like a declaratory judgment. (But certainly, a contract being invalid is a reason that a plaintiff might get zero dollars after suing for money damages.)
Declaratory judgments are a remedy created by statute, which can be applied to cases where some other legal or equitable remedy is sought, designed to ascertain and fix the rights of the parties.
IDK if declaratory judgments even fit into the framework of this topic. But I would want to steer farther away from the topic, when discussing judgments at law for damages or for no-damages.
Also: a HUGE part of what courts in equity used to do when they were separate institutions - though not in the federal judiciary - was estate and family law. To the point that it seems weird to talk about specific performance, bankruptcy, and civil contempt in a commercial setting instead of, like a divorce or probate!
Would love to hear more of your thoughts
Very good explanation
I have one for you, "probate conspiracy". When the feds open a probate against a citizen who has already run a state probate.😂
I used the Secretary of State in California over an election issue that was not covered by statute. I used at equity. This was in Sacramento Superior Court.
what was the outcome?
@@studyallthetimeallthetime8473
I prevailed. I used the magic words: there is no speedy and effective remedy. I wished to run for public office. I was a registered Green. I was the chair of the state wide platform committee. A small group of Greens filed for the right to pick and choose in what districts they would run candidates. A civil rights attorney, an ally, rushed me to the court house. I was unable to stop it, but was granted intervene status.
This left me without pathway to run. The granting of a request from a group not authorized by the plenary by this judge had reduced a qualified party to a coffee klatch. I obtained a speedy court date and went in pro per. I was not asking for much. I asked for a writ of mandamus ordering the Secretary of State to allow me to run as an independent. They did object. However, those magic words rang true. The Court did issue the order, and I collected 14,000 signatures in my congressional district. This achievement was sited in a subsequent case in which a potential candidate claimed that three percent of the registered voters was impossible to meet. I came in a poor third, beaten by both major parties but ahead of all minor ones combined, producing no benefit to society. As the district was seventy percent Democratic, the usual scoundrel won. My Green detractor in Santa Barbara ran as a Green and caused a Republican victory.
The Judge said " Next time get a lawyer." I don't think there will be a next time, but I grew my own lawyer; my daughter. But the elements were in place: irreparable harm, no other remedy, and an area not covered by statute. I used that as an excuse for why I did not have any points and authorities to present. I am quick on my feet with excuses. " Your Honor, there can be none as this situation is unique ".
My strong advice is that a candidate should never run except in a major party primary. It didn't even work for Teddy Roosevelt.
Please, go into more depth. I too live in Sacramento. I am asking for a reason that I cannot go into because I still don't have enough information /facts to rely on to make a statement. Thank you
thank you! where does admiralty fit into all of this?
Great information and highly useful. I would point out something you seem to have missed and that is the emergence of territorial courts in the US where judges were granted a common law jurisdiction. These courts were not under the FRCP [Mookini v United States 303 US 201]. These tribunals still exist [EPA and Forest service tribunals for example]
SC has a court of equity
Interesting stuff. Thanks :)
Ty 👍
Thank you. I have a problem with the family courts. According to your description, they are equity courts because there is no jury. I see your point about dividing a family, but I think this creates a judge who has the kind of power that a monarch would have. America's founders were against this kind of power, and so am I. It is an abusive system. Common law and juries can do the equity court if the disputes are broken down into small pieces. A big problem is that judges are instructing the jury, and this is wrong. Juries can decide against the law as easily as they can decide with the law. The judge did not create the law, so why is he telling juries what they can judge for themselves?
This feels just.
This better not be about Delaware...
Nah it's about Delawhen
@@BiggestCorviddelawho ?
Delawhat?
Now yall known Del-a-why!! Now stop playing and tell the truth.
Lol... Delaware has a court of Chancellery that is moreso visible than other states. What he is speaking is universal in all states...court of kings conscience!
We still employ Magna Carter too. Or we did.
are you licensed in Arizona? I may need your help.
New Zealand?
Equity is the result of deducting liabilities from assets.
Great video!
Keep doing what you're doing, bro. Most conspiracy theories are simply truths nobody wants to face at for 50-60 years like the U.S. government 😂.
New n exciting, thank you 😊 ❤
Subscribed
America hasn't been around for 1000 years...
New sub from Texas, god blues and merry Christmas
Thanks for introducing me to something new.👍
I thought this would be about modern politics because of the word equity, but it's about history which is infinitely cooler 🙂
What was will be and always has been.
@@Erik-e2d3t Time is a flat circle. Infinite regressive recursion and infinite expansion are one in the same because conformal cyclic cosmology is the only truth. 🫠
@@Stevie-J then there is eternity which ebbs and flows and empties out somewhere no where
i demand financialy equity wityh all men
Family law is an example. Election law too.
Very nice work!:) Valerie Law
I would argue that they eliminated the true common law (look up the historical definition of "court of record ") in favor of their version of equity. Which is that all property is owned by the State. The judge will decide if we have a small equitable interest or not.
I don't know jack about sh*t but something about this sounds accurate.
State owns all property?...like communism?
I have listened once, will have to listen again and I appreciate your spelling all of this out. Dealing with a common law issue (equity?) currently, and have questions. I am certain I'll find an answer once I understand.
Thanks.
Eerie v Tompkins 1938
Do you have a way to message you?
How would go about finding what building is for law and equity if they do not tell you, but from my observation bankrupty court seems best since American is usurp by another government called the United States
thousand year old court in a country that is less than 300 years old.
Thanks for the tid bit...more importantly...When is VW going to start selling the TDI's again un the US? Thanks...and subbed!
There are theologians that believe Satans little season began under the rein of King Henry the 7th.. or the Red Dragon era. Some also think it just ended with the recent Notre Dame ritual, or the portal deal? I would beg the differ..
There's a reason why lawyers used to be called devils advocates. Devils greatest trick he doesn't exist, how you disappear from the human consciousness you change your name!
I’m still confused.
Im trying to understand equity, i wish I understood the entire system
I have watched this and other.videos and noone has explained what rquity court is...
Still doesmt answer any questions
I'm a layman and curious where the Crown Temple and the British Accredited Registry fit in all this considering the former was established in 1215, and the latter in the 1600's.
Also, are all deeds just represented by color of law and a land patent is the official document of ownership?
except we are under admiralty law and every level of state and fed govt, dept, and agency is incorporated.
we don't have common law anymore. look up gold fringe flag in flag rules. look up B.A.R association
Unfortunately search engines ignore punctuation, which leaves "B.A.R association" with millions of pages of standard references. Any pointers?
No, they only had a few law ability to change land or equity especially because land is sought as commodity exchange and basic Republic only ..as in define re - public ..move some away to inhabit as owner is illegal conversion. The chance it's caught is higher than they want
Thank you for your video.
I can tell you follow your curiosity. I am a follower as well.
Bankruptcy and Family courts.
Criminal and Civil courts.
Please don't conflate two distinct courts. Many people, particularly young men need to understand the terms of the social contract.
Equitable relief can be sought in any court of law.
However there is a fundamental difference in administration and procedure between a court of law and a court of equity.
whether.a judge has more flexibility? True enough.
Dependent on the relief sought? Injunctive relief, restraining orders, in Courts of law.
First, A court of Equity is formed outside Constitutional protections.
The proceedings are not adversarial.
Family Court,no jury, no right against self incrimination, no presumption of innocence, no right to an attorney, no due process. Nothing to do with a criminal case where the government is against the individual.
A sacred oath of marriage is not a contract for goods and services. Hence no prenup agreements are binding on the parties or the court.
It is not a civil dispute.
Most importantly, the parties ask or petition the court for help. If a divorce plan is submitted with no unresolved issues between the parties, all things being equal, the court has no jurisdiction to do anything but approve the plan. No fault divorce is the rule because nobody got time for endless he said she said debates. No government is designed to deal with the marital problems of it's citizens.
FFS, the self governed can't build enough courts and prisons for due process to function properly.
The history of how the courts deal with child custody, and property has been reversed over the past centuries.
That would be an interesting and informative video.
As for Bankruptcy Court, again not an adversarial proceeding. Petitioners seek protection from the court and must have clean hands. Full disclosure of all assets, complete cooperation with the trustee and the court. No criminal law protections.
Debts discharged dispite the objections of creditors.
Are there Appeal courts for these courts of Equity?
The history of law is important and interesting.
Suggestions for legal topics.
On religious practice.
Polygymy. What is the state's compelling interest to prohibit a long standing religious practice?
SCOTUS treated polygymy as bigamy. A crime due to elements of fraud.
However if the multiple wives are informed consenting adults who is being harmed?
Society at large?
Idaho Religious Exemption.
Every State requires the state coroner to certify the cause of death of any child.
Why do religious adherents require an exemption for faith deaths of children, when faith healing fails?
New sub for you ❤