VERY GLAD that I bought for my 74th birthday (8 days to go), a 2018 Kawasaki Ninja 400 ABS KRT Edition. An incredibly SUPERB (and extremely handsome) machine. I've been loving every mile riding it. Thanks for the vid. Liked and subbed.
@@usernamemykel Great stuff, it's ideal having a group of like minded riders, especially with a safety orientated perspective of having fun on two wheels!
They are great machines really, it's easy to think being a smaller capacity means missing out, but the 400 will still get you into trouble and is so easy to ride (or ride fast)!
@@gigi9467 I find it pretty decent on the Ninja, but obviously you're not getting a touring motorcycle level of protection. I don't get wind to the chest on the freeway but do notice it around my helmet, and I sit fairly upright cruising at highway speeds.
@@gigi9467 I am fairly tall at 184 cm, but I find it find for the quick commute day in and day out. On weekends when I get out on the freeway a lot more, I find it much better than my previous naked bike. The wind flows over me - no problem, probably because my position is slightly forward. I have thought about replacing the screen with a larger one down the track - when this screen is scuffed up and dinged a bit.
I got the Z400 mostly due to more upright stance. Put on an LV10 exhaust for a little sound. The stock exhaust is remarkably quiet. No complaints at all. A pleasure to ride.
Awesome! How's the LV10 exhaust? I'm still looking for a good option for the Ninja 400, but it can't be too loud as the wife rides the bike a fair bit. It's way too quiet stock though.
@@MotoJournoKris It's fairly loud. Louder than I expected. .Maybe the Akrapovic would be more suitable. Sounds fairly quiet in this video: ruclips.net/video/7qZZpUGVNyM/видео.html I have 3 videos on my channel with sound for the LV10
43 years of riding, and 7 machines later I can say my 2018 Baby Ninja is just a beauty of a bike! I also own a 2015 VFR800 DX in red and the Ninja is a prettier bike.
Hey Kris, Nice review. BTW, what's the thing that you installed on back of ninja 400? Is it a sissy bar? Do you have a link? Is it compatible to Z400 too?
That's a Ventura EVO bag, I think the 22 litre from memory. It'll fit both the Z400 and Ninja 400. I was running the older style rack which has the grab handle there, the newer EVO racks are flat (link below). You used to be able to buy just a grab handle too, for when you didn't want a rack installed. www.kenma.com.au/K119EV22/EVO_dash_22-22L-Jet-Stream-Kit-KAWASAKI-NINJA-400-_and_-Z400-18_dash_23/pd.php If the link doesn't work Google Kenma Ventura Rack Ninja 400
I went for the total black...but I put Kawasaki green guards covering the pipes and radiator..and I also put on a Akrapovic exhaust on..love it Thanks again..
At 83 I'm riding a Kawasaki GPZ 500s which is fine but have been thinking about getting the Ninja 400. Plenty fast enough & the lighter bike appeals to me at my age. Thanks for the video, all helps to make one's mind up :)
I hope I'm still riding at 83, sounds like you're doing awesome. Definitely worth taking one for a test ride, I'd be interested to hear how you think they compare.
Bit the bullet and got the Z400 as my first bike. Had it delivered with 1 mile on the odometer. After a few weeks of ownership, several practice session and lots of video watching (lol) I now have just over 75 miles on it. (USA permits limit the times you can ride, and I still have a full time job) No regrets. I find excuses to go to the store - to practice my riding skills. I look forward to taking a training course in the spring to get my permanent endorsement. I baby this bike, and am faithfully watching the break in period limits per the owners manual. I find that with any vehicle if you treat it right, don't abuse it and follow the manufactures recommendations they last a LONG time. I hope my new Kawasaki follows suit.
Congratulations, the Z400 is a great place to start! Taking care of the bike will definitely reward you in the long term and Kawasaki are great for reliability. That's one of the great things about riding too, finding all those excuses to head out or do multiple trips. Stay safe out there and have fun!
I was looking at the Honda CBR300 R. I think the reason I started looking at the Kawasaki Z 400 and Ninja 400 was that they are parallel twins. It seems like a twin would be smoother than the Honda single. And there is only an added 50 lbs. I wanted to see them compared to each other. Thanks. I want something light and not too much power. A bike that makes training in a class not a weight worry. Great at learning tight maneuvers.
The CBR300R was always realistically one of the best entry-points into motorcycling if you wanted something light, easy to handle, manageable power and just an all-round great option, without pushing for more performance. The newer CB300R is even lighter, which is only going to help there. There's definitely some advantages with the 400 twins, they rev harder and longer and there's a fair bit more power, but it just depends on what you're after as a rider!
I didn't really notice them to be an issue on either of the bikes. The 500 is a little meatier with the torque where you'd probably be revving the Z400 out a bit more in a similar situation.
I swear by the Ventura Luggage, which is what's on the Ninja 400 in that cover picture. It mounts via two L-Brackets from the pillion peg mounting points and there's a cross bar under the licence plate holder in the tail (with no cutting or drilling). You can choose from the EVO-22 which I've got there, which is like a sporty mid-size day bag, or something larger Mistral bag which is a bit more touring orientated. There's also a really small EVO-10 bag if you want to go really sporty and once you've got that mounting system installed, you can buy the different bags (and sometimes racks) to suit. The bags and racks are universal too, so if you change bags you can just get a new set of L-brackets for your new bike and it'll all fit. I really hate riding with a backpack, where with the Ventura system I rarely notice there's any luggage fitted at all.
Believe it or not, camera bags make amazing motorcycle bags for much cheaper. They’re typically well made to hold expensive gear, have segments and sections to organize camera gear which is good for keeping stuff from moving around while you ride and good strap setups. Personally on my bike I run a cargo net on my pillion and just leave it there all the time, and I wear a backpack for my daily essentials. For food, I add a soft cooler I strap around my neck and shoulder and rest in my lap in front of me, keeps my takeout hot or ice cream cold. Drinks and small items in my backpack and clunky items in the net. You’d be surprised how much you can carry comfortably with that setup. I typically ride with a shoulder strap tactical day bag with a low buckle, so I can in buckle it to throw over my shoulder and helmet and buckle back up, it’s fast, small and doesn’t catch wind too bad. Downside is in certain conditions it will migrate sideways, and need adjustment.. but that’s are enough that it doesn’t bother me, I like being able to stop, swing the bag around to the front and grab water, or a wipe for my helmet or check my phone and swing it back and tighten it. Hope this helps, I’ve been riding this setup for a few years and it works for me.
Hi!!! Im planning to get a bike soon. I was thinking about the duke 390 and z400 . Maybe you can help me decide which is better between the two. Really appreciate if you will help on this. Thanks a lot and always ride safe.
Absolutely, they are great models to compare as they both fill the same niche. Apart from styling which is subjective, bigger differences are between the highly strung single-cylinder in the KTM and the parallel-twin in the Kawasaki which is still nice and punchy down low but has a larger rev range. Performance is similar on paper but how it's delivered is quite different. The KTM is hard to beat in the brake department, but the Z400 and Ninja 400 are really good as well. The Duke also has a pretty snazzy display. I'd normally think about the KTM as being the sportier option, and more aggressive in the handling department. Both are quite compact too. What kind of riding are you planning on doing, lots of commuting and heavy traffic, or more weekend riding or a mix. Also worth sitting on the bikes to see how they fit, as that varies hugely between riders and some people just find one bikes feel much better than another due to that. That and think about local dealer support. I hope that helps, but if you've got any specific questions about certain things ask away.
Having been a motorcyclist since 1977, a 400 will destroy 95% of all cars within the speed limit, so why bother with huge bikes.,cheap tyres, insurance, low weight, mind-blowing fuel economy . My day a Kawasaki S3 looked mind blowingly cool, sounded amazing, used shit loads of fuel thrashed , God I loved the 70s, stick today up your ass.
I like the idea of Z400 but to me the ninja 400 is just a much much more good looking bike for just a small increase in price so I will go with the ninja.
Hi. I was wondering whether the body kit of the z400 is able to fit on the ninja 400? I own a ninja 400 for a couple of years now and I'd like to project it. Thanks in advance.
I'm not sure to be honest! I'd assume if you had all the brackets it should be possible though, as they are basically the same machine with some exceptions, like the top triple/bar mounts, which may also effect the headlight mount. I'd be interested to hear how you go if you give it a try!
I have a 2006 Suzuki SV650 naked I bought new then, the only mods are a bar-riser and a rather large fairing....it is getting old and worn out...like me, I am getting older and in my mid 50s (but I cannot replace myself, only maintenance)...This means to me that I do not need to progress to faster speeds (naked 1000's) so something like the Z400 would suit me just fine. Just add Kawasaki's own 'Meter Cover' fairing ($75) for better protection, the "ERGO-FIT EXTENDED REACH SEAT" ($200) which should fix the discomfort of the stock seat maybe some after-market frame slider and bar risers.....Which leads me to my next point.....If there was a Versys X-400 (currently the X-300 weighs in 22 lbs more than the Z400) which already brings the more comfortable seat, more upright ergos and a windscreen as standard it would be game over.
Sounds like you well and truly got your money's worth out of the SV650! The Z400 is great fun, but may be a little more compact than the SV depending on your size, while a Versys X400 would really be an amazing addition to the Kawasaki range. I think the 400 powerplant has enough power and torque for everything, as long as you're not trying to race mates on 1000cc sportsbikes in a straight line!
Thanks for your thoughts on this bike. I am a new rider. Lots of reviews say this Ninja 400 is one of the best starter bikes. However I am also thinking to get the Honda CBR650R directly so to save me from spending much more money on changing larger bike for the long run in the near future. Is that true new riders will miss lots of riding techniques if they started on 650cc instead of lower power bikes? Any experienced rider can share your thoughts if I should go for this 400cc bike or just jump to 650cc instead? Thanks and safe riding!
Honda's CBR650R is also a great machine, the big benefit on starting on something smaller is it makes those very early stages a little bit easier, but particularly if you want a machine that'll last a number of years without the need to upgrade the 650s are a really good option and many - like the CBR650R are aimed at being a good entry level option. The Ninja 400 offers pretty amazing performance for the capacity, but most of the 650s still offer a fair bit more torque. The smaller capacity machines also force you to be a bit more technical in some ways, since you don't have the speed, but it's more jumping straight on a 120hp+ bike that can work as a crutch for working on a lot of skills. But even that varies rider to rider here too. The 'best' bike really comes down to the rider at the end of the day, for some people it'll be the Ninja 400, others might find the CBR300R does everything they need, some swear by the MT-07 (/FZ-07) or one of the other 650s. There'll be people running around the inner city where a Grom would be best for them too.
I love the looks of the Ninja but I am sold on the Z400. I'm usually a Ninja guy but I'm wanting a bike that's more forgiving and upright because my wrists are getting arthritis LOL. thank you for your honest review
Hi nice review.. im planning to buy a new bike. Im torn between z400 and the R3.. what would you recommend and im curious. Why did you choose the kawasaki over the yamaha? Thank you
Well to be honest I got the Kawasaki before the new R3 came out and I wanted to teach my wife to ride a motorcycle. She liked the look of the Ninja which made for an easy choice. Between the two bikes now I'd say the big advantage of the Z400 is all that mid-range torque and obviously being a nakedbike and new it stands out. The resale on these should be pretty good as well, since it's a big step up from the Z300. The R3 on the other hand has an exceptionally smooth engine and gearbox and while it doesn't have the same low down torque it really does deliver like a mini-R6. It also has a more comfortable seat and if you're doing lots of highway riding it'll offer better wind protection with the fairings.
Z400 all the way man! Nice performance and speed it’s a bike that’ll make money’s worth. But sit on it and see how you like it. I can guarantee you that the 400s will win, that’s why I love Kawasaki.
A.J. I Ninja 400 is Beautiful bike that’s comfortable. I’m 5’8 and damn it looks big. Don’t get discouraged by these assholes that says you’ll grow out of it. I have the Z125 Pro and it’s still fun to ride.
Haha, a bit outside my area of expertise I'm afraid. I've mainly seen it on more powerful machines (I love the Driftpocalypse vid with the turbo'd Triumph 675s), but not really sure.
On the Kawasaki Motors Australia website if you go to the bike model, then click the accessories tab there's the range available. It's harder to spot what's available in the accessories section off the main site, as it's not sorted by bike - or I'm missing how to do that.
Asia market the Ninja top speed is around 190-196kmh depending on your gear play and weight while the Z400 is around 183-187kmh stock.So far the modern powerful 2 cylinders 400cc in the market..Yamaha,Honda,KTM,Suzuki should wake up
I've seen the R3 do similar indicated numbers on the dash (192km/h-ish) when people have tested it and videoed and that was with the older model which was less aerodynamic, but it would come to speedo error to see which is actually fastest, since it could be 5-10% out at 200km/h.
@@MotoJournoKris Have you ever tried the R3 or MT03? That engine is so smooth! I own a Yamaha MT03 and I am thinking to exchange it for the new R3 which has just arrived in my country. At the exact same time Kawasaki released the new Z400, but I am more inclined to stay with the Yamaha...but still doing my research... it seems that the brakes on the Kawasaki are much better. I personally know an owner of the Kawa Z300 which uses the bike daily and I have to say the bike does not look good after 3 years of use, but this can be his own fault, I do not know ,, anyway, here Yamaha R3 has 4 years warranty and Kawasaki only 2 years
@@42much1 Yep I've got a test up on the new R3 and a comparison with the Ninja 400, and I rode the MT-03 a few years ago. They are incredibly smooth, especially compared to the Ninja 400! The Yamaha 321cc powerplant is definitely a standout in that regard, it might not have the extra torque of the Kawasaki but its buttery smooth and has an exceptional top end. I'd agree the brakes on the Ninja have a fair bit more bite, I kind of liked the R3 brakes though, they required a little more force at the lever but there was still good power. If you wanted more bite, a different set of pads should sort it for you. A four-year warranty is also exceptional on a new bike, I haven't heard about that many problems with either, but it's great for peace of mind as well as resale, if you can pass the warranty on to a new owner!
I think it may just be a conservative figure for whatever reason, as far as the Z400, 100 mph should be achievable with 110 a fairly common claim from many riders as far as gps/corrected speedo readouts. There's a lot of variance between riders though, some are saying 100, others are saying 120! (mph), with rider weight, how tucked in they can get, possibly even mods all being a consideration that may be forgotten when those figures are shared. The aero advantage of the fairings on the Ninja is huge though as you get right up top, especially in situations where you can tuck right in and just go WoT on an essentially endless straight like some of the American highways. It's also possible there's variance between machines and markets, some of the US spec bikes were dyno'd above the quoted performance figure back when the Ninja first launched, so that may be true of the Z400 too. Other places there's the 35 kW restriction, which is basically 47 hp, which is less than what may be otherwise possible.
@@MotoJournoKris thanks, I kept looking after my reply to your vid. I found a guy who had a cam on his dash and hit 114. It seemed flat, and lots of other similar claims are out there. I don’t really want to go 100+, but I was wondering if they were tuned differently. It looks like they aren’t. Thanks!
@@trailguy Sometimes there can be a really big difference in gearing with the nakedbikes which really hurts their top speed, but gives them more low and mid-range, but I think it's the same with these models. It can be hard to tell where the differences lie without full tech breakdowns though!
There's the genuine Kawasaki option that they call a 'meter cover' fitted to the one pictured here, or PowerBronze also offer what looks like a taller screen again, more like a sportsbike screen. Puig seem to do one that looks more touring orientated, it's taller and more upright.
Where can i get a cargo rack mounting bracket for the ninja 400. I wanna put a givi tailbox on mine. On the offical kawa site they only offer it on a 650.
I think the clutch is a bit too light. I even read in forums about owners burning their clutch due to the weak springs. And i noticed on stand still that the handle bars and the front wheel is not aligned (but its normal).
I've heard of people with the clutch issue online, and putting heavier springs in to fix it, however I don't think this is necessarily that common, for every person complaining online there's generally 100 people without an issue out riding, while in this case there's generally about five saying they have no issue. Plus the way an assist/slipper clutch works means much lighter springs can be used. It's possible it is just a batch of bikes with a specific issue, or being so light people are just abusing them without realising, particularly if they aren't adjusted properly - which especially applies to new riders. I'll have a look at my Ninja 400 and see how the wheel alignment looks though, no clutch issues so far with about 6000km covered.
Another thing is that the hole where the rear cables go under the pillion seat is too open that water/mud fucks up your entire compartment when riding on wet surfaces. I just stuffed a tissue paper and avoid riding on wet roads. Those are my only nitpick s and i couldn't be happier with the bike.
I'm on my re but got a z800 Cause I think it's unfair for bike riders that have lots of years on a bike it should be on experience And the tester should be able too see
I didn't notice if it did, but I haven't really ever had an issue on either of these machines in regards to heat. My Daytona by comparison gets very very toasty stuck in traffic in summer.
I am a new 400 owner (coming from a larger bike). I dont think you can go wrong either way but if you're looking for a long term bike I would recommend the 650. However, if you're heading for a supersport I would point you toward the Ninja 400. Assuming you would want to sell it in a year or two.
The Ninja 400 is a good choice if you want the sportsbike, the Ninja 650 isn't quite as sporty, although it does offer the bigger bike feel and ergos. If you're in a market with restrictions on the beginner motorcycles, the 400 offers similar performance too. Otherwise the 650 will have a performance edge, but it's also significantly heavier. There's plenty of potential with the Ninja 400 though and it's a great place to learn sportsbikes from.
Twin brake rotors vs a single brake rotor. What is more important than being able to stop fast? 650 is by far the better choice, regardless of power. It's also more powerful by almost 20 bhp.
@@heroictesticles6870 Most riders probably won't see a significant difference between the 650 with dual disc brakes on the front and all the extra weight, over the Ninja 400 with the single rotor, and would probably find it much easier to stop as fast as possible on the 400. There's also no extra power in any market where they use A2 type restrictions (35kW), but there's a definite benefit in having more of a full power machine where those restrictions don't come into play - if you hold onto the 650 long term, or get a few more years before an upgrade. Plus the 400s 30% cheaper looking new vs new. If you could get the latest gen 650 secondhand cheaper than a 400, that'd be a good deal, while the older 650s are even heavier again.
I bought my Z650 today and man it’s lovely,I haul ass and it’s just built for comfort and speed at a good rider ergonomics. I’m 5’8 and will keep this bike for many years.
3yrs learners permit? 😆 in 1985 i turned 15 went to dmv on my birthday took the motorcycle test on a 1974, Honda 250 elsinore. 15 minutes later i had my motorcycle license. Next week i bought a 1979 gs 1000. God bless America. 🇺🇸.
@ Small trade off for being able to rely on a functioning public health system, and getting more riders on the road as safely as possible. Sadly they don't make training mandatory for drivers who go through the same process, which just churns out people who think driving is a right, rather than a privilege and have non-existent driving skills that put everyone at risk.
@ No need to get so offended, lol. The only thing I was equating to public health care is the fact there's some responsibilities attached to that right. In this case, motorcyclists are rightly recognised as being the most at-risk group on the road, and there's some additional responsibilities attached here, which include a graduated licencing scheme, requirement to wear a helmet and mandatory training, and that's all setup because accidents cost money. It's actually based on the American finding, where the US Airforce recognised they were losing a lot of highly skilled pilots to motorcycle accidents and decided training was the solution, which is a great alternative to just banning people from doing something risky. If you're more interested in espousing your political beliefs than motorcycles, take it elsewhere.
Dirk Diggler Enjoy your God given freedoms (even though it’s actually your man made Constitution that provides them to you) and keep jerking off to Trump’s speeches if you want, we in our “socialist” countries will enjoy the same freedoms while accept some (insignificant) limitations for the common good.
Americans always preaching about their shithole of a country like if there was no civilized world out there with a lot more respect for their inhabitans without resorting to the "muh freedom" memes that only allow corporate greed to prey into the citizens. They keep getting scammed with the whole fear of communism yet they keep the biggest war machine because guns are more important than healthcare. Bragging because you can go and buy a liter bike straight away as if it made any sense is just another way to see the moronic cult they have become. Where their personal freedom is more important than the safety of everyone else in the road. Let them have it, let them believe their country is the way to go. Let them eat the far right lies and believe they are the best of the best. It's the only thing they have after all.
To be honest I probably forgot to take a bit of video of each dash to put up, and while the Z is visible earlier, the camera angle misses it entirely on the Ninja onboard.
Great question, for regular riding not too much, however you'll find a lot more wind buffeting on the freeway and top speed would suffer. Being a torquey machine I don't think you'd notice it at legal speeds.
The Ninja 400 offered significantly more wind protection, keeping in mind the Z400 tested was fitted with Kawasaki's genuine screen. I didn't find either lacking, but the Ninja 400 is the clear winner with the fairings and more substantial screen.
if it is true ..ninja 400 cc top speed otr is 190 - 198 kmph with over 100 m indonesia rp l think it is better to buy china zongshen ycr yz 400 cc super bike with lower price 3.800 usd in china ..but having top speed at 200 kmph 43 hp 180kg weight good looking too !!!!!!!!!!/!!!!!!!
From a reliability and build quality perspective I haven't seen the Zongshen versions, but I'd want them to be significantly cheaper than a Ninja 400 to consider them. Something like the Ninja 400 here will have a great resale, which means when it comes time to upgrade you get a lot more of your buy-in back towards your next machine. With a lot of the really cheap machines after a few years they are worth almost nothing, and even if you're keeping it long term, you end up with a bike that ages very quickly. With that said I'd have to see and test the Zongshen in person to see if that would be the case.
I'd go the Ninja 400 personally, even though it's a 'sportsbike' it's still quite relaxed and is a great all-rounder, without most of the sportsbike compromises. I'd want to add the bellypan and screen to the Z400 which adds to the cost in comparison.
VERY GLAD that I bought for my 74th birthday (8 days to go), a 2018 Kawasaki Ninja 400 ABS KRT Edition.
An incredibly SUPERB (and extremely handsome) machine. I've been loving every mile riding it.
Thanks for the vid. Liked and subbed.
That's awesome! The KRT edition looks wicked and is so much fun to ride, stay safe out there!
@@MotoJournoKris
Thanks, bro'!
That is so cool.
@@MotoJournoKris Thanks, Kris.
Joined a notorious motorcycle club called the "Blue Knights" - great bunch of guys!
@@usernamemykel Great stuff, it's ideal having a group of like minded riders, especially with a safety orientated perspective of having fun on two wheels!
I love my Ninja 400. Over a year on it - and still finding it excellent for commuting, and extended weekend rides around Brisbane.
They are great machines really, it's easy to think being a smaller capacity means missing out, but the 400 will still get you into trouble and is so easy to ride (or ride fast)!
How is the wind protection
@@gigi9467 I find it pretty decent on the Ninja, but obviously you're not getting a touring motorcycle level of protection. I don't get wind to the chest on the freeway but do notice it around my helmet, and I sit fairly upright cruising at highway speeds.
@@gigi9467 I am fairly tall at 184 cm, but I find it find for the quick commute day in and day out. On weekends when I get out on the freeway a lot more, I find it much better than my previous naked bike. The wind flows over me - no problem, probably because my position is slightly forward. I have thought about replacing the screen with a larger one down the track - when this screen is scuffed up and dinged a bit.
Yay ! Me favorite Town. Where do you ride mostly. I would think Mt. Nebo would be a natural choice.
"Z400 feels like a naked bike"
That is because it is a naked bike?
I think he was just reassuring that the Z400 really does feel like a true naked bike
I got the Z400 mostly due to more upright stance. Put on an LV10 exhaust for a little sound. The stock exhaust is remarkably quiet. No complaints at all. A pleasure to ride.
Awesome! How's the LV10 exhaust? I'm still looking for a good option for the Ninja 400, but it can't be too loud as the wife rides the bike a fair bit. It's way too quiet stock though.
@@MotoJournoKris It's fairly loud. Louder than I expected. .Maybe the Akrapovic would be more suitable. Sounds fairly quiet in this video:
ruclips.net/video/7qZZpUGVNyM/видео.html
I have 3 videos on my channel with sound for the LV10
Cool, I'll have a look now. Thanks!
hey buddy excellent review of these bikes. i love how you did the comparison. this is the best review i've seen. thank you
Thanks, hopefully it was helpful, if you're looking at these machines!
43 years of riding, and 7 machines later I can say my 2018 Baby Ninja is just a beauty of a bike!
I also own a 2015 VFR800 DX in red and the Ninja is a prettier bike.
Nice! It really stands out that all kind of riders have a great time on the Ninja 400, not just new riders.
I 2nd that "pretty"!
Hey Kris, Nice review. BTW, what's the thing that you installed on back of ninja 400? Is it a sissy bar? Do you have a link? Is it compatible to Z400 too?
That's a Ventura EVO bag, I think the 22 litre from memory. It'll fit both the Z400 and Ninja 400. I was running the older style rack which has the grab handle there, the newer EVO racks are flat (link below). You used to be able to buy just a grab handle too, for when you didn't want a rack installed.
www.kenma.com.au/K119EV22/EVO_dash_22-22L-Jet-Stream-Kit-KAWASAKI-NINJA-400-_and_-Z400-18_dash_23/pd.php
If the link doesn't work Google Kenma Ventura Rack Ninja 400
Just bought my Kawasaki Ninja 400cc ..absolutely love it..thanks for your help making my mind up...
That's awesome, glad I could be of some help! Which colour did you get?
I went for the total black...but I put Kawasaki green guards covering the pipes and radiator..and I also put on a Akrapovic exhaust on..love it Thanks again..
@@customcruise Very nice!
Im starting to really like the look of the z400
They're even better in the flesh! Not sure I did the bike justice in the footage.
At 83 I'm riding a Kawasaki GPZ 500s which is fine but have been thinking about getting the Ninja 400. Plenty fast enough & the lighter bike appeals to me at my age. Thanks for the video, all helps to make one's mind up :)
I hope I'm still riding at 83, sounds like you're doing awesome. Definitely worth taking one for a test ride, I'd be interested to hear how you think they compare.
Bit the bullet and got the Z400 as my first bike. Had it delivered with 1 mile on the odometer. After a few weeks of ownership, several practice session and lots of video watching (lol) I now have just over 75 miles on it. (USA permits limit the times you can ride, and I still have a full time job) No regrets. I find excuses to go to the store - to practice my riding skills. I look forward to taking a training course in the spring to get my permanent endorsement. I baby this bike, and am faithfully watching the break in period limits per the owners manual. I find that with any vehicle if you treat it right, don't abuse it and follow the manufactures recommendations they last a LONG time. I hope my new Kawasaki follows suit.
Congratulations, the Z400 is a great place to start! Taking care of the bike will definitely reward you in the long term and Kawasaki are great for reliability. That's one of the great things about riding too, finding all those excuses to head out or do multiple trips. Stay safe out there and have fun!
I was looking at the Honda CBR300 R. I think the reason I started looking at the Kawasaki Z 400 and Ninja 400 was that they are parallel twins. It seems like a twin would be smoother than the Honda single. And there is only an added 50 lbs. I wanted to see them compared to each other. Thanks. I want something light and not too much power. A bike that makes training in a class not a weight worry. Great at learning tight maneuvers.
The CBR300R was always realistically one of the best entry-points into motorcycling if you wanted something light, easy to handle, manageable power and just an all-round great option, without pushing for more performance. The newer CB300R is even lighter, which is only going to help there. There's definitely some advantages with the 400 twins, they rev harder and longer and there's a fair bit more power, but it just depends on what you're after as a rider!
Twin also sounds way better than a single
I prefer the look of the ninja 400 but I don't like the low clip ons,can taller clip ons be fitted to make a more upright riding position.
There might be an aftermarket option available, but I haven't looked into it too much at this point!
Hi Chris between the z400 and cb500F , which one has less vibrations transferred to hands and feet? Thanks, regards.
I didn't really notice them to be an issue on either of the bikes. The 500 is a little meatier with the torque where you'd probably be revving the Z400 out a bit more in a similar situation.
Just got a z400 and love it. Always had cruisers with saddle bags.now i have to ride with a back pack.whats the best storage option.
I swear by the Ventura Luggage, which is what's on the Ninja 400 in that cover picture. It mounts via two L-Brackets from the pillion peg mounting points and there's a cross bar under the licence plate holder in the tail (with no cutting or drilling).
You can choose from the EVO-22 which I've got there, which is like a sporty mid-size day bag, or something larger Mistral bag which is a bit more touring orientated. There's also a really small EVO-10 bag if you want to go really sporty and once you've got that mounting system installed, you can buy the different bags (and sometimes racks) to suit. The bags and racks are universal too, so if you change bags you can just get a new set of L-brackets for your new bike and it'll all fit.
I really hate riding with a backpack, where with the Ventura system I rarely notice there's any luggage fitted at all.
Believe it or not, camera bags make amazing motorcycle bags for much cheaper. They’re typically well made to hold expensive gear, have segments and sections to organize camera gear which is good for keeping stuff from moving around while you ride and good strap setups.
Personally on my bike I run a cargo net on my pillion and just leave it there all the time, and I wear a backpack for my daily essentials. For food, I add a soft cooler I strap around my neck and shoulder and rest in my lap in front of me, keeps my takeout hot or ice cream cold. Drinks and small items in my backpack and clunky items in the net. You’d be surprised how much you can carry comfortably with that setup.
I typically ride with a shoulder strap tactical day bag with a low buckle, so I can in buckle it to throw over my shoulder and helmet and buckle back up, it’s fast, small and doesn’t catch wind too bad. Downside is in certain conditions it will migrate sideways, and need adjustment.. but that’s are enough that it doesn’t bother me, I like being able to stop, swing the bag around to the front and grab water, or a wipe for my helmet or check my phone and swing it back and tighten it.
Hope this helps, I’ve been riding this setup for a few years and it works for me.
Hi!!! Im planning to get a bike soon. I was thinking about the duke 390 and z400 . Maybe you can help me decide which is better between the two. Really appreciate if you will help on this. Thanks a lot and always ride safe.
Absolutely, they are great models to compare as they both fill the same niche. Apart from styling which is subjective, bigger differences are between the highly strung single-cylinder in the KTM and the parallel-twin in the Kawasaki which is still nice and punchy down low but has a larger rev range. Performance is similar on paper but how it's delivered is quite different.
The KTM is hard to beat in the brake department, but the Z400 and Ninja 400 are really good as well. The Duke also has a pretty snazzy display. I'd normally think about the KTM as being the sportier option, and more aggressive in the handling department.
Both are quite compact too.
What kind of riding are you planning on doing, lots of commuting and heavy traffic, or more weekend riding or a mix. Also worth sitting on the bikes to see how they fit, as that varies hugely between riders and some people just find one bikes feel much better than another due to that. That and think about local dealer support.
I hope that helps, but if you've got any specific questions about certain things ask away.
Having been a motorcyclist since 1977, a 400 will destroy 95% of all cars within the speed limit, so why bother with huge bikes.,cheap tyres, insurance, low weight, mind-blowing fuel economy .
My day a Kawasaki S3 looked mind blowingly cool, sounded amazing, used shit loads of fuel thrashed ,
God I loved the 70s, stick today up your ass.
Yep you can absolutely thrash the 400s and have so much fun. They are ideal really.
Great review. In the process of getting the 2020 KRT version.
Awesome, I love the KRT colours, it's just so Kawasaki and they really stand out.
I like the idea of Z400 but to me the ninja 400 is just a much much more good looking bike for just a small increase in price so I will go with the ninja.
The Ninja 400 is really distinct and eye catching, especially for that tiny premium!
Let the good times roll!
Hi. I was wondering whether the body kit of the z400 is able to fit on the ninja 400?
I own a ninja 400 for a couple of years now and I'd like to project it. Thanks in advance.
I'm not sure to be honest! I'd assume if you had all the brackets it should be possible though, as they are basically the same machine with some exceptions, like the top triple/bar mounts, which may also effect the headlight mount. I'd be interested to hear how you go if you give it a try!
I have a 2006 Suzuki SV650 naked I bought new then, the only mods are a bar-riser and a rather large fairing....it is getting old and worn out...like me, I am getting older and in my mid 50s (but I cannot replace myself, only maintenance)...This means to me that I do not need to progress to faster speeds (naked 1000's) so something like the Z400 would suit me just fine. Just add Kawasaki's own 'Meter Cover' fairing ($75) for better protection, the "ERGO-FIT EXTENDED REACH SEAT" ($200) which should fix the discomfort of the stock seat maybe some after-market frame slider and bar risers.....Which leads me to my next point.....If there was a Versys X-400 (currently the X-300 weighs in 22 lbs more than the Z400) which already brings the more comfortable seat, more upright ergos and a windscreen as standard it would be game over.
Sounds like you well and truly got your money's worth out of the SV650! The Z400 is great fun, but may be a little more compact than the SV depending on your size, while a Versys X400 would really be an amazing addition to the Kawasaki range. I think the 400 powerplant has enough power and torque for everything, as long as you're not trying to race mates on 1000cc sportsbikes in a straight line!
Thanks for your thoughts on this bike. I am a new rider. Lots of reviews say this Ninja 400 is one of the best starter bikes. However I am also thinking to get the Honda CBR650R directly so to save me from spending much more money on changing larger bike for the long run in the near future. Is that true new riders will miss lots of riding techniques if they started on 650cc instead of lower power bikes? Any experienced rider can share your thoughts if I should go for this 400cc bike or just jump to 650cc instead? Thanks and safe riding!
Honda's CBR650R is also a great machine, the big benefit on starting on something smaller is it makes those very early stages a little bit easier, but particularly if you want a machine that'll last a number of years without the need to upgrade the 650s are a really good option and many - like the CBR650R are aimed at being a good entry level option. The Ninja 400 offers pretty amazing performance for the capacity, but most of the 650s still offer a fair bit more torque. The smaller capacity machines also force you to be a bit more technical in some ways, since you don't have the speed, but it's more jumping straight on a 120hp+ bike that can work as a crutch for working on a lot of skills. But even that varies rider to rider here too.
The 'best' bike really comes down to the rider at the end of the day, for some people it'll be the Ninja 400, others might find the CBR300R does everything they need, some swear by the MT-07 (/FZ-07) or one of the other 650s. There'll be people running around the inner city where a Grom would be best for them too.
@Moto Journo Kris Thank you for your valuable and prompt reply! I do learn something from your channel. Please keep up your great job! Peace out
What's the weather/wind protection like with the fairings on the ninja compared to the z400?
Thanks
Much better, but you really need to tuck in to get the most out of it, which for regular riding may not be so common.
Great comparison vid, thank you!
I love the looks of the Ninja but I am sold on the Z400. I'm usually a Ninja guy but I'm wanting a bike that's more forgiving and upright because my wrists are getting arthritis LOL. thank you for your honest review
The flat and taller 'bars on the Z400 do really help on that side of things!
Look into a crampbuster to help on the throttle there only about 10 bucks
Hi nice review.. im planning to buy a new bike. Im torn between z400 and the R3.. what would you recommend and im curious. Why did you choose the kawasaki over the yamaha? Thank you
Well to be honest I got the Kawasaki before the new R3 came out and I wanted to teach my wife to ride a motorcycle. She liked the look of the Ninja which made for an easy choice.
Between the two bikes now I'd say the big advantage of the Z400 is all that mid-range torque and obviously being a nakedbike and new it stands out. The resale on these should be pretty good as well, since it's a big step up from the Z300.
The R3 on the other hand has an exceptionally smooth engine and gearbox and while it doesn't have the same low down torque it really does deliver like a mini-R6. It also has a more comfortable seat and if you're doing lots of highway riding it'll offer better wind protection with the fairings.
Z400 all the way man! Nice performance and speed it’s a bike that’ll make money’s worth. But sit on it and see how you like it. I can guarantee you that the 400s will win, that’s why I love Kawasaki.
Thank you👍👍👍
The ninja 400
A.J. I
Ninja 400 is Beautiful bike that’s comfortable. I’m 5’8 and damn it looks big. Don’t get discouraged by these assholes that says you’ll grow out of it. I have the Z125 Pro and it’s still fun to ride.
I saw this z400 and I mean instant love at first sight! 😊😊😊 Thought the z300 is still d most badass Z ever!
They do look wicked!
Hey thanks for the video.
Can one drift on this z400?
Haha, a bit outside my area of expertise I'm afraid. I've mainly seen it on more powerful machines (I love the Driftpocalypse vid with the turbo'd Triumph 675s), but not really sure.
They’re effectively the same bike, just styled differently for rider preference
Where do you find the accessories for the Z400? I cant find them on the OEM website🤔
On the Kawasaki Motors Australia website if you go to the bike model, then click the accessories tab there's the range available. It's harder to spot what's available in the accessories section off the main site, as it's not sorted by bike - or I'm missing how to do that.
Asia market the Ninja top speed is around 190-196kmh depending on your gear play and weight while the Z400 is around 183-187kmh stock.So far the modern powerful 2 cylinders 400cc in the market..Yamaha,Honda,KTM,Suzuki should wake up
I've seen the R3 do similar indicated numbers on the dash (192km/h-ish) when people have tested it and videoed and that was with the older model which was less aerodynamic, but it would come to speedo error to see which is actually fastest, since it could be 5-10% out at 200km/h.
@@MotoJournoKris Have you ever tried the R3 or MT03? That engine is so smooth! I own a Yamaha MT03 and I am thinking to exchange it for the new R3 which has just arrived in my country. At the exact same time Kawasaki released the new Z400, but I am more inclined to stay with the Yamaha...but still doing my research... it seems that the brakes on the Kawasaki are much better.
I personally know an owner of the Kawa Z300 which uses the bike daily and I have to say the bike does not look good after 3 years of use, but this can be his own fault, I do not know ,, anyway, here Yamaha R3 has 4 years warranty and Kawasaki only 2 years
@@42much1 Yep I've got a test up on the new R3 and a comparison with the Ninja 400, and I rode the MT-03 a few years ago. They are incredibly smooth, especially compared to the Ninja 400! The Yamaha 321cc powerplant is definitely a standout in that regard, it might not have the extra torque of the Kawasaki but its buttery smooth and has an exceptional top end.
I'd agree the brakes on the Ninja have a fair bit more bite, I kind of liked the R3 brakes though, they required a little more force at the lever but there was still good power. If you wanted more bite, a different set of pads should sort it for you.
A four-year warranty is also exceptional on a new bike, I haven't heard about that many problems with either, but it's great for peace of mind as well as resale, if you can pass the warranty on to a new owner!
Why does the ninja have a 25 mph higher top speed? (I usually see 114 vs 91) are they tuned differently?
I think it may just be a conservative figure for whatever reason, as far as the Z400, 100 mph should be achievable with 110 a fairly common claim from many riders as far as gps/corrected speedo readouts. There's a lot of variance between riders though, some are saying 100, others are saying 120! (mph), with rider weight, how tucked in they can get, possibly even mods all being a consideration that may be forgotten when those figures are shared.
The aero advantage of the fairings on the Ninja is huge though as you get right up top, especially in situations where you can tuck right in and just go WoT on an essentially endless straight like some of the American highways.
It's also possible there's variance between machines and markets, some of the US spec bikes were dyno'd above the quoted performance figure back when the Ninja first launched, so that may be true of the Z400 too. Other places there's the 35 kW restriction, which is basically 47 hp, which is less than what may be otherwise possible.
@@MotoJournoKris thanks, I kept looking after my reply to your vid. I found a guy who had a cam on his dash and hit 114. It seemed flat, and lots of other similar claims are out there. I don’t really want to go 100+, but I was wondering if they were tuned differently. It looks like they aren’t. Thanks!
@@trailguy Sometimes there can be a really big difference in gearing with the nakedbikes which really hurts their top speed, but gives them more low and mid-range, but I think it's the same with these models. It can be hard to tell where the differences lie without full tech breakdowns though!
I have a question about accessory wind screens. The Z400's screen is so small and short. Is there a taller and wider screen from anyone ?
There's the genuine Kawasaki option that they call a 'meter cover' fitted to the one pictured here, or PowerBronze also offer what looks like a taller screen again, more like a sportsbike screen. Puig seem to do one that looks more touring orientated, it's taller and more upright.
I cant really pick one of them because i Love the both bikes so got my self a Z400 And a 2020Ninja 400
Can't go wrong with both!
@@MotoJournoKris yep
Is there one you enjoy riding more than the other?
@@ChallengeMeBROO the ninja
@@hezekiahpambalan2328 interesting
Great review !
I love Ninja 400 it is sporty look and higher top speed
...ill go with Z400
Beautiful bikes,I like both of them!
Hi mate, this bike 400cc which factory came from india or indonesia?
I believe these Kawasaki 400s are manufactured in Thailand.
Where can i get a cargo rack mounting bracket for the ninja 400. I wanna put a givi tailbox on mine. On the offical kawa site they only offer it on a 650.
I'm not sure about a cargo rack, I use a Ventura system, and I've run a Coocase topbox, which comes with a mounting plate that would do a similar job.
@@MotoJournoKris thanks i only seen Ventura for external mounts. And the sportsrack for the passenger cargo replacement mount
I think the clutch is a bit too light. I even read in forums about owners burning their clutch due to the weak springs. And i noticed on stand still that the handle bars and the front wheel is not aligned (but its normal).
I've heard of people with the clutch issue online, and putting heavier springs in to fix it, however I don't think this is necessarily that common, for every person complaining online there's generally 100 people without an issue out riding, while in this case there's generally about five saying they have no issue. Plus the way an assist/slipper clutch works means much lighter springs can be used.
It's possible it is just a batch of bikes with a specific issue, or being so light people are just abusing them without realising, particularly if they aren't adjusted properly - which especially applies to new riders. I'll have a look at my Ninja 400 and see how the wheel alignment looks though, no clutch issues so far with about 6000km covered.
Another thing is that the hole where the rear cables go under the pillion seat is too open that water/mud fucks up your entire compartment when riding on wet surfaces. I just stuffed a tissue paper and avoid riding on wet roads. Those are my only nitpick s and i couldn't be happier with the bike.
Good tip, I better check under there, it's probably filthy! I haven't opened it up since I put in an air filter.
I'm on my re but got a z800
Cause I think it's unfair for bike riders that have lots of years on a bike it should be on experience
And the tester should be able too see
Is it true that the ninja 400 emanates more heat felt by the rider caused by an enclosed engine than the open engine z400
I didn't notice if it did, but I haven't really ever had an issue on either of these machines in regards to heat. My Daytona by comparison gets very very toasty stuck in traffic in summer.
@@MotoJournoKris 👍😊
Other than about 12 lbs of plastic fairing and some different bars the two bikes are identical.
Buying either a new 400 or 650 Friday. Cant wait.
I am a new 400 owner (coming from a larger bike). I dont think you can go wrong either way but if you're looking for a long term bike I would recommend the 650. However, if you're heading for a supersport I would point you toward the Ninja 400. Assuming you would want to sell it in a year or two.
The Ninja 400 is a good choice if you want the sportsbike, the Ninja 650 isn't quite as sporty, although it does offer the bigger bike feel and ergos. If you're in a market with restrictions on the beginner motorcycles, the 400 offers similar performance too. Otherwise the 650 will have a performance edge, but it's also significantly heavier. There's plenty of potential with the Ninja 400 though and it's a great place to learn sportsbikes from.
Twin brake rotors vs a single brake rotor. What is more important than being able to stop fast? 650 is by far the better choice, regardless of power. It's also more powerful by almost 20 bhp.
@@heroictesticles6870 Most riders probably won't see a significant difference between the 650 with dual disc brakes on the front and all the extra weight, over the Ninja 400 with the single rotor, and would probably find it much easier to stop as fast as possible on the 400. There's also no extra power in any market where they use A2 type restrictions (35kW), but there's a definite benefit in having more of a full power machine where those restrictions don't come into play - if you hold onto the 650 long term, or get a few more years before an upgrade. Plus the 400s 30% cheaper looking new vs new.
If you could get the latest gen 650 secondhand cheaper than a 400, that'd be a good deal, while the older 650s are even heavier again.
I bought my Z650 today and man it’s lovely,I haul ass and it’s just built for comfort and speed at a good rider ergonomics. I’m 5’8 and will keep this bike for many years.
They need to put this engine in the versys x
Tell me about it, that would rock!
Fully agree , i think it is just a matter of time.
Happy birthday , congratulations what a nice mature choice. I wish you many happy hours of riding.
Many thanks! Really appreciated.
Nice video 👌👏 subscribed ❤️☺️
Is that same engine of both 400,,
Yep they share the same powerplant/engine.
Z400 is the better choice.
3yrs learners permit? 😆 in 1985 i turned 15 went to dmv on my birthday took the motorcycle test on a 1974, Honda 250 elsinore. 15 minutes later i had my motorcycle license. Next week i bought a 1979 gs 1000. God bless America. 🇺🇸.
Kinda, 6-9 months on your Learners, then two stages of P-plates (Provisional) for three years total, then you can get any bike.
@ Small trade off for being able to rely on a functioning public health system, and getting more riders on the road as safely as possible. Sadly they don't make training mandatory for drivers who go through the same process, which just churns out people who think driving is a right, rather than a privilege and have non-existent driving skills that put everyone at risk.
@ No need to get so offended, lol. The only thing I was equating to public health care is the fact there's some responsibilities attached to that right. In this case, motorcyclists are rightly recognised as being the most at-risk group on the road, and there's some additional responsibilities attached here, which include a graduated licencing scheme, requirement to wear a helmet and mandatory training, and that's all setup because accidents cost money. It's actually based on the American finding, where the US Airforce recognised they were losing a lot of highly skilled pilots to motorcycle accidents and decided training was the solution, which is a great alternative to just banning people from doing something risky.
If you're more interested in espousing your political beliefs than motorcycles, take it elsewhere.
Dirk Diggler Enjoy your God given freedoms (even though it’s actually your man made Constitution that provides them to you) and keep jerking off to Trump’s speeches if you want, we in our “socialist” countries will enjoy the same freedoms while accept some (insignificant) limitations for the common good.
Americans always preaching about their shithole of a country like if there was no civilized world out there with a lot more respect for their inhabitans without resorting to the "muh freedom" memes that only allow corporate greed to prey into the citizens. They keep getting scammed with the whole fear of communism yet they keep the biggest war machine because guns are more important than healthcare. Bragging because you can go and buy a liter bike straight away as if it made any sense is just another way to see the moronic cult they have become. Where their personal freedom is more important than the safety of everyone else in the road. Let them have it, let them believe their country is the way to go. Let them eat the far right lies and believe they are the best of the best. It's the only thing they have after all.
4:10 why not show the dashes whe you comment on them? Its not like the bikes arent right next to you.
To be honest I probably forgot to take a bit of video of each dash to put up, and while the Z is visible earlier, the camera angle misses it entirely on the Ninja onboard.
The lack of fairings makes the z 400 have much more difficulty accelerating than ninja 400?
Great question, for regular riding not too much, however you'll find a lot more wind buffeting on the freeway and top speed would suffer. Being a torquey machine I don't think you'd notice it at legal speeds.
How is the wind protection betweein the two?
The Ninja 400 offered significantly more wind protection, keeping in mind the Z400 tested was fitted with Kawasaki's genuine screen. I didn't find either lacking, but the Ninja 400 is the clear winner with the fairings and more substantial screen.
I pick Ninja 400.
Wait for a Ninja on sale. Mine was $3150.
That's a great price, there's plenty of amazing deals out there if you can find them!
Next facelift usd forks and more led strobe light and extra hp
Apparently the US non-restricted versions actually have a fair bit more HP than those in restricted markets, so there's potential there!
İ somehow cant take the ninja serious because of The "Ninja" sticker. İts like a toy imo, the Z400 is more classy
Fair enough, the race replica style isn't for everyone! I definitely appreciate the nakedbike styling, it's super clean.
Its like comparing an autotuner to another autotuner. The same thing sold differently...
Z400 It is not just like a naked bike, Because it is a naked bike.
👍👍👍
how much the price of z400
Here in Australia they are $6,299 + on-road costs. US pricing is listed as from $4,799 MSRP.
if it is true ..ninja 400 cc top speed otr is 190 - 198 kmph with over 100 m indonesia rp l think it is better to buy china zongshen ycr yz 400 cc super bike with lower price 3.800 usd in china ..but having top speed at 200 kmph 43 hp 180kg weight good looking too !!!!!!!!!!/!!!!!!!
From a reliability and build quality perspective I haven't seen the Zongshen versions, but I'd want them to be significantly cheaper than a Ninja 400 to consider them. Something like the Ninja 400 here will have a great resale, which means when it comes time to upgrade you get a lot more of your buy-in back towards your next machine. With a lot of the really cheap machines after a few years they are worth almost nothing, and even if you're keeping it long term, you end up with a bike that ages very quickly.
With that said I'd have to see and test the Zongshen in person to see if that would be the case.
Linda moto.....
Beutiful design.....
nice review. dont know what to pick haha
typical D was thinking of the z400 but price made me choose the ninja.
I wanted an electric Ebike but they cost 2x too much :(
Yep they seem to either be quite basic, or very expensive.
Z400
I like simple one I don't like shade
wish the z400 had a taller windshield...
The one pictured is accessory fit, but from memory there are some taller options out there, they might just be aftermarket accessories though.
@@MotoJournoKris Cool Thanks, ill have to look around
@@MotoJournoKrishow much of a difference did the accessory fit windscreen make compared to stock?
Friend z400 ou ninja 400?
I'd go the Ninja 400 personally, even though it's a 'sportsbike' it's still quite relaxed and is a great all-rounder, without most of the sportsbike compromises. I'd want to add the bellypan and screen to the Z400 which adds to the cost in comparison.
Show the goddamned features!
I’m s gyre tge junks 4oo