For transparency: The reference to King Vikramaditya’s inscription in a Turkish library, specifically Sayar-ul-Okul from Makhtab-e-Sultania, is often mentioned in alternative historical discussions, particularly in the works of P. N. Oak. However, mainstream historians and academic institutions do not recognize any verified records of this manuscript or library. I always strive to present history with an open mind, and while such claims exist, they remain debated and unverified in mainstream historical research. If anyone has authentic historical sources supporting this, I’m open to exploring further. Let’s keep the discussion factual and engaging!
Vikramaditya had asta siddhi bethal which can do anything. This throne is was buried. later uncovered in 16 century. Krishna devaraya used it. Now that is part of Mysore dynasty. The current throne in Mysore no ordinary has long history and mystical power
@@rahulreddy3558 I am from that area and here are some historical sites are present related to him and we built Vikramaditya temple here.we know he was real.
The liberals historians like Romila Thapar and Marxist alliance didn’t want Vikramaditya’s name in history because he (a Hindu king ) ruled over Saudi Arabia. There are comic books on him but these liberal historians said he was a mythical king.
To me, that's criminal and they should be charged. The amount of abuse we've had to face, particularly in the diaspora. The modern era was named after him - We have a right to know ore.
Hindus have demeaned themselves so much that we are the sole reason why the world decides to only hate us. We gave without boundaries, even our glory is called mythical all cus, Indians wanted to praise others. Itna bhi accha nhi hona chahiye humey
That's a fiction story from children story book not history so historian affiliating to any ideology don't take it seriously,in those times middle and central Asia was ruled by parthian,romans china by han till 5 th century ce ,so how did he created this empire show ,where did all of these empires go
@saimtanweer4145 anything other than what u believe cannot be dismissed as fictional😀😀😀after 5000 years probably u can also be declared as fictional😀😀😀
There is another book titled Seir-ul-Okul in a library of TopKapi, Turkey. This book also mentions Raja Vikramaditya as the one who gave the Arabs a Dharmik way of life and spirituality. This book, is however, a record of what was coined on a golden plate, embedded in the temple of Dushara at Petra, Jordan.
Historians called him mythical because after him many kings took upon the name vikramaditya because he was so popular.... so it becomes confusing to identify him
When I was very young about 9 or 10 years old I had read all books of Vikram Vetal and book Sinhasan batisi. That left very good image in my mind of Great king Vikramadity, about truth and Justice, how king should help his citizens from poverty, and injustice, and how king should sacrifice for his citizens. This makes citizens happy, but army of king suppose to be strong.
Sir you are a great history expert. Thanks for giving this valuable information. It's a request to you to give the answers of the following questions Q.1 What are the indian archaeological evidences and references of samrat vikramadiya? Q.2 What are the names of the emperors and kings whom he fight with in iran, iraq, arab and egypt, china and russia? Q.3 As you mentioned that it is impossible to cross the great wall of china, how samrat vikramaditya cross this wall to conqueror the china? Q.4 Why is it saying in the world that the emperor of kushan empire 'kanshika the great' issued the saka samvat in 57 A.D.? Q.5 Why kanishka the great developed the statues in gandhar and madhura art, whose art of statues indian are used nowadays?
Absolutely! Samrat Vikramaditya and Samrat Harshavardhan were two of the greatest rulers in Indian history, and their stories deserve deep exploration. We’ll continue to uncover the forgotten legacies of India’s legendary emperors. In fact, our next video will be on Samrat Lalitaditya Muktapida, another remarkable king whose empire stretched far beyond Kashmir. Stay tuned for that, and let me know if there’s any specific aspect of these rulers’ histories you’d like to see covered!
Thank you Harry. Samrat Vikramaditya's reign was an uncovered topic even in the Net. There was hardly anything we could find. Thank you for sharing some knowledge about the Legendary King. Looking forward to know more about Samrat Vikramaditya.
blud nobody forgot ashoka, mauryan period had writings from chandragupta to last mauryan king. those inscriptions only further made us more knowledgable about him. dont believe evrything u read on the internet
@@idktbhwtf-k9i yes Ashoka wasn't that much remember before British era , it was after 1947 glorification of Ashok started , people remembered chandragupta maurya far more than they remember Ashoka
Only through the inscriptions we come to know that there was a king called askoka...the inscriptions were in brahmi script..only after James prinsep decipher the script...we were able toh know what it was about..before that no one knew askoka the great...@@idktbhwtf-k9iso you are completely wrong... during the reign of askoa there was no paper technology anywhere in the world..and i believe there was a great king named vikramaditya... because he was like an idol for later kings..even during gupta empire the great king chandragupta (second) took the title of vikramaditya..so the original vikramaditya of ujjain used to be an idol for later king till gupta empire...
All Hindu Place Ashok will high esteem as he Killed Thousands of Hindu and also honoured him a Space in Indian denominations. And this tradition Continues till date that Killing of Hindu is honoured in India.Mahatma Gandhi got Lakhs of Hindus Massacred at the Partition of India got The Space in The Indian Currency. Sir Modi ji Welcomed Covid along with Trump registered Lakhs of Deaths ,And Bhakhs are not Contended desire more death So as to Request RBI for Space for Modi ji. Who has not Heard Vital 25 ,How Could his name Survive in the Tan trick Land India Where The ancestors of Indian's Charged Jagat Janni ,Sita Ji to Earth and forced Prabhu Sri Krishna to beg Land to Sea God. Nomo Narayana!
India had definitely not forgotten him. Although he was convenientlydiscarded by mainstream historians as a myth best known for his role in Vikram and vetal. Chakravathin by all rights, Vikramaditya is rivalled only by Lord Krishna in his knowledge of science, occult and statecraft. He is the most influential figure in KALKI era and had a very important role to play innshortening the span of KALKI. Not well known is the fact the hw was the second son of Adi Sankaracharya's Guru - Govind Bhagawath Pada. He inherited the throne of his maternal grandfather, (Govind Bhagwatpada's Father in Law). His elder brother Hari abdicated the throne in Vikram's favour and took Sanyas under his father and became known as Brhathari. Govind Bhagwat Pada's hermitage was on the bank of Narmada, just before his moksha he summoned both Vikram and and Sankara (to become Adi Sankaracharya) - He gave secret instruction to both. Sankara was to secure and protect the spiritual borders of Sanatan Dharma for future generation and support Kalki. Voikrama was ordained a more arduous task of securing the Borders of Akhanda Bharat and also to carry out some essential tasks in the areas where Bharat weilded vivilisational influence as a soft power. His visits include visit to Solomon's Temple (AL AQSA MOSQUE) and Makeshwar Jyothirling (Mecca) and he carried out his Father's secret bidding. CHAKRAVARTHI VIKRAMADITYA IS DEFINITELY NOT FORGOTTEN. He set up sleeper cells which have activated at various times in the past and will do so in the future.
@@ETERNITY-OM Man atleast read his sentence " rivaled only by sri krishna in science, occult and state craft." Did you understand a bit of his sentence?. He is saying indirectly that no one was able to rival him in these fields.
Very interesting to know the untold history of India. The present govt should include Vikramaditya story in history books. No one bothered to spread such a strong ruler of Bharat. Jai Hind Jai Bharat 🇮🇳
Nalanda University, one of the oldest and most prestigious educational institutions in the world, was located in ancient India, near modern-day Bihar. It flourished from the 5th century CE and attracted scholars from all over Asia, including China, Korea, Japan, Tibet, Mongolia, Sri Lanka, and Southeast Asia. Nalanda was renowned for its vast library, which housed countless texts on subjects like Buddhism, philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine. The destruction of Nalanda University is a tragic chapter in history. It was famously destroyed by the forces of Bakhtiyar Khilji, a Turkic Muslim invader, in 1193 CE. According to historical accounts, after capturing the city, Khilji's forces set fire to the university, and the immense library was burned for months, with thousands of manuscripts and irreplaceable knowledge lost forever. This act was not only a blow to intellectualism in India but also a significant loss to global learning. The destruction of Nalanda was part of a larger pattern of invasions during the medieval period, where cultural and educational institutions were targeted. The decline of such centers of learning had long-lasting effects on India's intellectual and scientific advancements. However, Nalanda's legacy lives on. In recent years, efforts have been made to revive Nalanda University, with the establishment of a new campus in the region, aiming to bring back its spirit of academic excellence.
Since my birth i have been listening to this figure due to Nath panth literature being discussed at my home...especially guru gorakshnath , and bhartahari legendary conversation and his brother raja vikramaditya story et.
You can find more detail about chakravati samrat Vikramaditya in Bṛhatkathā (Sanskrit, "the Great Narrative") is an ancient Indian epic, said to have been written by Guṇāḍhya in a poorly-understood language known as Paiśācī (language spoken by spirits and ghosts). The work no longer exists but several later adaptations - the Kathāsaritsāgara (कथासरित्सागर), Bṛhatkathāmañjarī (बृहत्कथामंजरी) and Bṛhatkathāślokasaṃgraha (बृहत्कथाश्लोकसंग्रह) in Sanskrit, as well as the Peruṅkatai and Vasudevahiṃḍi in vernaculars
People who are living a refugee life from Afghanistan in Delhi, mumbai like places can answer more efficiently to the question..like how Afghanistan was conquered..in places like iran iraq islam took over sanatan dharma in centuries of time..but the actual truth is they even left the countries without establishing muslim religion completely ..in their opinion everything is islamic but people who got converted they believe they’ve accepted humanity..now everybody knows how much human values are considered..
@@kishorek2272 no, gupta empire was established in 3rd century whereas Samrat Vikramaditya's reign was in 1st century, later many borrowed his name because of his widespread fame
Chandragupta II(Vikramaditya) of the Gupta Empire not Vikramaditya Empire defeated the Sakas and there is no evidence that he has ever conquered the Arabia
@@gandaberunda6267 He doesn't needed to do that as there are nothing in Arabic land to conquer. But he did send brahmin to establish worship of Matkasvar Maharaj(Shiv) in kaba whom Arabic people have forgotten after indulging in material activities.
Nalanda University, one of the oldest and most prestigious educational institutions in the world, was located in ancient India, near modern-day Bihar. It flourished from the 5th century CE and attracted scholars from all over Asia, including China, Korea, Japan, Tibet, Mongolia, Sri Lanka, and Southeast Asia. Nalanda was renowned for its vast library, which housed countless texts on subjects like Buddhism, philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine. The destruction of Nalanda University is a tragic chapter in history. It was famously destroyed by the forces of Bakhtiyar Khilji, a Turkic Muslim invader, in 1193 CE. According to historical accounts, after capturing the city, Khilji's forces set fire to the university, and the immense library was burned for months, with thousands of manuscripts and irreplaceable knowledge lost forever. This act was not only a blow to intellectualism in India but also a significant loss to global learning. The destruction of Nalanda was part of a larger pattern of invasions during the medieval period, where cultural and educational institutions were targeted. The decline of such centers of learning had long-lasting effects on India's intellectual and scientific advancements. However, Nalanda's legacy lives on. In recent years, efforts have been made to revive Nalanda University, with the establishment of a new campus in the region, aiming to bring back its spirit of academic excellence.
Where can I download Shukla-Ul-Azhar pdf with translation? Vikram Samvat Panchang (Grah-Planets, Var-Day Starting from Sunrise, Tithi-Lunar Phases, Nakshatra-Constellations, Yoga-Union). Combining Lunar Plane and its intersection with Sun-Earth plane at Rahu & Ketu points and its 18 year rotation cycle is a Mathematical marval and advanced Trigonometry & Calculus. Calculating when the next Solar Eclipse will be with the hour and minute precision with Planetary alignment in its exact constellation placement. STILL NOT TAUGHT IN OUR SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS.
This account of Samrat Vikramaditya contains a mix of historical facts, folklore, and speculation. Let’s fact-check the claims systematically: 1. Did Vikramaditya Rule an Empire from Ujjain to Arabia? No concrete historical evidence suggests that Samrat Vikramaditya ruled an empire stretching from India to Arabia, Iran, or Iraq. Vikramaditya is a legendary title used by several Indian kings, particularly from the Gupta Dynasty (Chandragupta II, 375-415 CE) and later rulers. The most famous Vikramaditya is Chandragupta II Vikramaditya, who defeated the Western Kshatrapas but did not rule over Arabia. The Vikram Samvat calendar (57 BCE) is traditionally attributed to King Vikramaditya of Ujjain, but his historical existence remains debated. 2. Did Vikramaditya Defeat the Sakas? Yes, but not exactly as described. The Sakas (Scythians) were Iranian-origin invaders who established kingdoms in India around the 1st century BCE. The Saka invasions were stopped by rulers like Chandragupta II Vikramaditya (Gupta dynasty) and Rudradaman I (Western Kshatrapas). The complete eradication of the Sakas is a myth, as Saka rulers continued ruling parts of India for centuries. 3. Did the Huns (Xiongnu) Push the Sakas into India? Partially true. The Xiongnu (Huns) and Sakas (Scythians) were distinct but related nomadic groups. The Sakas were displaced by the Yuezhi (Kushans) rather than the Xiongnu. The Sakas entered India around the 1st century BCE, while the Huns invaded India in the 5th century CE. 4. Did Vikramaditya Establish a "Ram Rajya"? This is folklore, not history. The idea of a Ram Rajya (ideal kingdom of Lord Rama) is used as a symbolic concept. No historical records prove that a Vikramaditya ruler created an ideal kingdom explicitly based on Ram Rajya. 5. Did Vikramaditya Rule for Over 100 Years? Highly unlikely. No historical king has ruled for over 100 years in recorded history. The lifespan of historical kings generally ranged between 40-70 years. 6. Is Vikramaditya Mentioned in Arabic and Persian Texts? No solid evidence supports this claim. The supposed inscription in Istanbul's Maktab-e-Sultania Library has never been verified. Arabic sources from the pre-Islamic era rarely mention Indian kings. 7. Is the Vikram Samvat Calendar Linked to Vikramaditya? Yes, but the origin is debated. The Vikram Samvat calendar began in 57 BCE, but historians argue whether it was actually started by a historical Vikramaditya or later attributed to him. Some scholars suggest it may have been introduced by the Malwa kings or Saka rulers themselves. 8. Are Betal Pachisi and Singhasan Battisi Reliable Historical Records? No, these are literary works, not historical accounts. Betal Pachisi (Baital Pachisi) and Singhasan Battisi are medieval fables that glorify Vikramaditya but do not serve as reliable history. They were written centuries after the supposed events took place. Conclusion: This story blends history and legend. While a historical Vikramaditya (likely Chandragupta II) defeated the Sakas, many claims-such as ruling an empire up to Arabia, fighting the Huns, and ruling for 100 years-lack historical evidence and seem to be later mythological additions.
Sorry to say. But puranas are more than concrete prove that he existed and he is part of living memory of bharat and it's people. The problem is that we are so driven by western narrative we overlook our own sources and tradition.
The biggest problem is the different historical facts in different texts. We were taught King Vikramaditya's original name King Chandragupta -II. His father's name was King Samudragupta who was known as "Napoleon of India". You are telling us something else. 🙏🙏🙏
*Chakravarti Samrat Vikramaditya* Ruler of Asian Continent named *Jambudweepa* and architect of Sone ki Chidiya *Bharatvarsha* and later on Whoever became Samrat of Bharat adopted his name as Title eg: Samudragupta Vikramaditya, Chandragupta Vikramaditya, Skandagupta Vikramaditya, Hemchand (Hemu) Vikramaditya who fought Akbar and Behram Khan Mughal…. After britishers looted 60+ trillion usd from India 🇮🇳 our nation became poverty stricken after 1947..
The reference to King Vikramaditya’s inscription in the Turkish library, specifically Sayar-ul-Okul from Makhtab-e-Sultania, is often cited in alternative historical narratives, most notably in the works of P. N. Oak. However, it is important to note that mainstream historians and academic sources do not recognize the existence of this manuscript or library.
In reality there is no such works bro , people like him and other right wing Hindus have been claiming that they there is ancient arabic literature sayar okul or something,i have been asking for documents since 5 yrs they just spam same lines ,it's a fake made thing , arabic wasn't developed back in 1st century,it was a evolving language and books and literature wasn't produced in arabia back then
Kafi log bol rhe h historians vikramaditya ko mythical bolte the..😂😂 mujhe to vikramaditya hmesha se mahan samrat mante hu...pheli baar suna inko bhi mythical mana jata tha by vampathi distorians
There was no single king called Vikramaditya. It was a title bestowed upon various kings. Gupta rulers - Chandragupta II , Skandagupta used this title. Also, there are so many inaccuracies in this video. Mahkumbha was started by Adi Shankaracharya who lived in ninth century CE. King Amshu Varma of Nepal lived in 7th century.
I think you shd check his details in Rome's history and Vikram Sen was exactly called Vikramaditya, you may have your version but MP has scriptures, Puranas too, Arabia, Turkey, Rome. So, called Congressi Historian none of them graduated from History, ancient studies, Archeological studies.
@prithvi818 Please give me the sources names and I will look up. I don't believe in any version on the face value regardless of the political affiliation. As much as I would love to believe this, I want to look things for myself and time periods are important to confirm that multiple sources are referring to the same Vikramaditya
@@lipun1531 Vedas don't mention about Kumbh Mela as a festival. It only mentions about samudramanthan and the amrit kumbha. So these are pious places. You can take a dip anyday.
@@alphavar729 read chalukya history, 2 kings name will come, vikramadithya 1, vikramadithya 2, also read about vinya adithya and Immadi pulikeshi, King son names chooses very wisely, without any reason they don't keep wrong name, also Indian navy IAC vikramadithya simply not kept
Yes, in the Alwar district of Rajasthan, there is a famous site in the Aravalli hills where Raja Bharathari (Bhartrihari) is believed to have performed tapasya (penance). This place is known as Bhartrihari Temple (Bharathari Nath Temple) and is a significant pilgrimage site for devotees, especially those following Nath Sampradaya.
Thanks for bringing this up. Vikramaditya is most often confused with other kings with same name. I personally think a group of academics should firm a committee and trace all hindu kings from before Ramayan till Muslim invasions. Also if King Vikramaditya's history comes out it will change the history written by west.
Thank you for posting such a great king story. Such things inspire the young generation. How is it even possible to communicate with remote areas from his capital city? (My father told me he used to practice "Parakaya Pravesha" to travel such a long distance and rule with clear vigilance.
Is it the same Vikramaditya who had a brother by the name of Batti? I remember reading a Kannada book from my mother's library on Vikramaditya (I think almost around Thousand pages book). The way his valor and just behaviour had been described in the book, I had truly thought at that time that it was a fictional story
According to the Text named "Jyōthirvidhābharanam"written by the great poet kāl'idāsa,he mentioned that he started to writeen his book at 1000BCE means 3000 years ago so most of the mainstream historians will not accept that time period but its a quite logical because the later powers like the Roman Empire was not formed at that time...!😊
I have read Amar Chitra Katha's comic on Chandragupta Vikramaditya,was fascinated by his valour. Wondered people mentioned only the other Vikramaditya. valour. Wondered people only mentioned the story of the other Vikramaditya (who answered to ques valour. Often wondered why people mention only the Vikramaditya who replied to the little ghost which then ba
What a History India has 👏👏🗿 Our history is the oldest, rich culture, full of mighty kings and warriors. Sorry to say the bitter Truth but other communities came after that time with different fake ideology is just not comparable to Indian history. ✌️
There is a reason for why they declare him as a myth. If you are familiar with Kota V's and recently Vedveer Aryas work, the dating of Chandragupta Mauraya controversy, you will know exactly why. Vikramaditya in century 100BCE is supposed to have started the samvat era by defeating all the foreign kings like Sakas, Yavanas, Phallavs etc. But since they date Chandragupta Mauraya to the century 300BCE and consider him to have defeated the Greeks, Vikramaditya's history does not fit and hence they reject him as mythical. Not just that, but they juggle around Indian dates. So the Puranas place 1200 years between Mauraya and the Yavanas. But they have made them contemporary. The Puranas also say the Sakas come before the Greeks, but they have placed the Sakas after the Greeks. The Indian records and inscriptions say Saka era starts in around 600BCE and ends in around 100BCE, they place the start at 100CE. Even though we know India was under Persian rule in 600BCE, who were also Iranians. We also know from looking at Mauryan art and coins they have no Greek Hellenic influence at all and clearly belong to an older era. Unfortunately we can't scientifically date yet non carbon items, or it would have been obvious by now the Mauryan punch marked coins are not from 300BCE but around 1500BCE. But recently we now have indirect evidence from carbon dating proving it. Carbon dating of the shrine Ashoka built at Lumbini Nepal, showing dates of early site cultivation 1300BCE and now carbon dating of the late Gupta bower manuscript to 200CE, meaning early 300BCE was early Gupta. Thus we can now prove Vikramaditya is Chandragupta 2 of the Gupta era, also known as Vikram Aditya. Guys they have totally messed up our dates and chronology. It is the duty of independent Indians now to correct it.
For transparency: The reference to King Vikramaditya’s inscription in a Turkish library, specifically Sayar-ul-Okul from Makhtab-e-Sultania, is often mentioned in alternative historical discussions, particularly in the works of P. N. Oak. However, mainstream historians and academic institutions do not recognize any verified records of this manuscript or library.
I always strive to present history with an open mind, and while such claims exist, they remain debated and unverified in mainstream historical research. If anyone has authentic historical sources supporting this, I’m open to exploring further. Let’s keep the discussion factual and engaging!
Yup it's true sayar ul okul❤
Vikramaditya had asta siddhi bethal which can do anything.
This throne is was buried. later uncovered in 16 century. Krishna devaraya used it. Now that is part of Mysore dynasty.
The current throne in Mysore no ordinary has long history and mystical power
@@puneethkumarv7047I agree that king Vikram did siddh Betal and that helped him in expansion of his empire.
P. N. oak is a fictional writer who also says that Mughals didn't built Taj Mahal
@@Knowledge-1111-e6 sayar ul okul is not fantasy it manuscript at museum Turkish
I've always have had this feeling that he was a real person from history and now it has been confirmed thanks my respects from Fiji islands.
@@rahulreddy3558 I am from that area and here are some historical sites are present related to him and we built Vikramaditya temple here.we know he was real.
@unbiasednews5613 nice
Namaste brother from fiji
Well we use the Desi Calendar VikramSamvat year 2081;- so he was real...
And who confirmed this stupid shit???
I am from ujjain ,we have historical sites releated to him even now
😂😂do not disturb modi. he is busy with kejri
@@DK-lg7ti grow up brother !! 💩 everywhere is not cool go and first learn some manners and respect.
@@DK-lg7tido drunk man😂😂😂 show me one evidence of when did indian politicans did politics in his name🤡
The liberals historians like Romila Thapar and Marxist alliance didn’t want Vikramaditya’s name in history because he (a Hindu king ) ruled over Saudi Arabia. There are comic books on him but these liberal historians said he was a mythical king.
To me, that's criminal and they should be charged. The amount of abuse we've had to face, particularly in the diaspora. The modern era was named after him - We have a right to know ore.
These left historians r rascals...traitors of knowledge😢😢
Hindus have demeaned themselves so much that we are the sole reason why the world decides to only hate us. We gave without boundaries, even our glory is called mythical all cus, Indians wanted to praise others. Itna bhi accha nhi hona chahiye humey
That's a fiction story from children story book not history so historian affiliating to any ideology don't take it seriously,in those times middle and central Asia was ruled by parthian,romans china by han till 5 th century ce ,so how did he created this empire show ,where did all of these empires go
@saimtanweer4145 anything other than what u believe cannot be dismissed as fictional😀😀😀after 5000 years probably u can also be declared as fictional😀😀😀
Marvellous History. Blessed To Know 🪔 Chakravatin Samrath Vikramaditya🏹. 🙏Dhanyavad Harry Sahota🌾
There is another book titled Seir-ul-Okul in a library of TopKapi, Turkey. This book also mentions Raja Vikramaditya as the one who gave the Arabs a Dharmik way of life and spirituality. This book, is however, a record of what was coined on a golden plate, embedded in the temple of Dushara at Petra, Jordan.
😂😂😂 tell this to modi ji
Historians called him mythical because after him many kings took upon the name vikramaditya because he was so popular.... so it becomes confusing to identify him
Hmm
The whole indian history is based on megasthinis indica, which actually has no original notes.
When I was very young about 9 or 10 years old I had read all books of Vikram Vetal and book Sinhasan batisi. That left very good image in my mind of Great king Vikramadity, about truth and Justice, how king should help his citizens from poverty, and injustice, and how king should sacrifice for his citizens. This makes citizens happy, but army of king suppose to be strong.
Being true Indian i love such characters from our ancient history۔ 🎉❤
Our ancestors
Totally erased in history books but still persists in folklore and memories.
Sir you are a great history expert. Thanks for giving this valuable information. It's a request to you to give the answers of the following questions
Q.1 What are the indian archaeological evidences and references of samrat vikramadiya?
Q.2 What are the names of the emperors and kings whom he fight with in iran, iraq, arab and egypt, china and russia?
Q.3 As you mentioned that it is impossible to cross the great wall of china, how samrat vikramaditya cross this wall to conqueror the china?
Q.4 Why is it saying in the world that the emperor of kushan empire 'kanshika the great' issued the saka samvat in 57 A.D.?
Q.5 Why kanishka the great developed the statues in gandhar and madhura art, whose art of statues indian are used nowadays?
When did he said he captured
Northern Aisa
Would like to know more about Samrat Vikramadity as well as Samrat Harshavardhan. Can you make detailed videos on these great Samrats?
Absolutely! Samrat Vikramaditya and Samrat Harshavardhan were two of the greatest rulers in Indian history, and their stories deserve deep exploration. We’ll continue to uncover the forgotten legacies of India’s legendary emperors. In fact, our next video will be on Samrat Lalitaditya Muktapida, another remarkable king whose empire stretched far beyond Kashmir. Stay tuned for that, and let me know if there’s any specific aspect of these rulers’ histories you’d like to see covered!
Harshavardhan was a real king. Vikramaditya was not.
@@spacemann1425 ok space mannnn....🤣
यतो धर्म ततो हनुमानः, यतो हनुमानः ततो जयः'
'जहां धर्म है, वहां हनुमान हैं और जहां हनुमान हैं, वहां जीत है'.
जय बजरंगबली जय श्री राम😍🙏🚩🚩
In Nepal the national calendar is the Bikram Sambat (Vikram Samvat) and the year is 2081 B.S.
Thank you Harry. Samrat Vikramaditya's reign was an uncovered topic even in the Net. There was hardly anything we could find. Thank you for sharing some knowledge about the Legendary King.
Looking forward to know more about Samrat Vikramaditya.
Brother, I literally began researching this topic yesterday. Bhagavan is so good 🙏
Glad I could spark your interest! 🙏
We forgot Indias greatest emperor Ashoka as well for long time, But somehow his stone inscriptions survived to uncover him eventually.
blud nobody forgot ashoka, mauryan period had writings from chandragupta to last mauryan king. those inscriptions only further made us more knowledgable about him. dont believe evrything u read on the internet
@@idktbhwtf-k9i yes Ashoka wasn't that much remember before British era , it was after 1947 glorification of Ashok started , people remembered chandragupta maurya far more than they remember Ashoka
Asoka was not great 😊
Only through the inscriptions we come to know that there was a king called askoka...the inscriptions were in brahmi script..only after James prinsep decipher the script...we were able toh know what it was about..before that no one knew askoka the great...@@idktbhwtf-k9iso you are completely wrong... during the reign of askoa there was no paper technology anywhere in the world..and i believe there was a great king named vikramaditya... because he was like an idol for later kings..even during gupta empire the great king chandragupta (second) took the title of vikramaditya..so the original vikramaditya of ujjain used to be an idol for later king till gupta empire...
All Hindu Place Ashok will high esteem as he Killed Thousands of Hindu and also honoured him a Space in Indian denominations. And this tradition Continues till date that Killing of Hindu is honoured in India.Mahatma Gandhi got Lakhs of Hindus Massacred at the Partition of India got The Space in The Indian Currency. Sir Modi ji Welcomed Covid along with Trump registered Lakhs of Deaths ,And Bhakhs are not Contended desire more death So as to Request RBI for Space for Modi ji. Who has not Heard Vital 25 ,How Could his name Survive in the Tan trick Land India Where The ancestors of Indian's Charged Jagat Janni ,Sita Ji to Earth and forced Prabhu Sri Krishna to beg Land to Sea God. Nomo Narayana!
India had definitely not forgotten him. Although he was convenientlydiscarded by mainstream historians as a myth best known for his role in Vikram and vetal.
Chakravathin by all rights, Vikramaditya is rivalled only by Lord Krishna in his knowledge of science, occult and statecraft. He is the most influential figure in KALKI era and had a very important role to play innshortening the span of KALKI.
Not well known is the fact the hw was the second son of Adi Sankaracharya's Guru - Govind Bhagawath Pada. He inherited the throne of his maternal grandfather, (Govind Bhagwatpada's Father in Law). His elder brother Hari abdicated the throne in Vikram's favour and took Sanyas under his father and became known as Brhathari.
Govind Bhagwat Pada's hermitage was on the bank of Narmada, just before his moksha he summoned both Vikram and and Sankara (to become Adi Sankaracharya) - He gave secret instruction to both.
Sankara was to secure and protect the spiritual borders of Sanatan Dharma for future generation and support Kalki. Voikrama was ordained a more arduous task of securing the Borders of Akhanda Bharat and also to carry out some essential tasks in the areas where Bharat weilded vivilisational influence as a soft power. His visits include visit to Solomon's Temple (AL AQSA MOSQUE) and Makeshwar Jyothirling (Mecca) and he carried out his Father's secret bidding.
CHAKRAVARTHI VIKRAMADITYA IS DEFINITELY NOT FORGOTTEN. He set up sleeper cells which have activated at various times in the past and will do so in the future.
@@dhamalsri thanks for the details
Krishna is god Vikramaditya was a ruler, get a brain br🤣🙏
@@ETERNITY-OM Man atleast read his sentence " rivaled only by sri krishna in science, occult and state craft." Did you understand a bit of his sentence?. He is saying indirectly that no one was able to rival him in these fields.
Very interesting to know the untold history of India.
The present govt should include Vikramaditya story in history books.
No one bothered to spread such a strong ruler of Bharat.
Jai Hind Jai Bharat 🇮🇳
Jai Vikramaditya Maharaj❤❤❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳more educational videos like this will wipe out the propaganda by anti-Bharat forces..
Wonderful information on Bharat's true rich Hindu heritage.
Kudos ! for bringing out ancient Indias' monumental history and cultural influence across vast global regions.
Nalanda University, one of the oldest and most prestigious educational institutions in the world, was located in ancient India, near modern-day Bihar. It flourished from the 5th century CE and attracted scholars from all over Asia, including China, Korea, Japan, Tibet, Mongolia, Sri Lanka, and Southeast Asia. Nalanda was renowned for its vast library, which housed countless texts on subjects like Buddhism, philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine.
The destruction of Nalanda University is a tragic chapter in history. It was famously destroyed by the forces of Bakhtiyar Khilji, a Turkic Muslim invader, in 1193 CE. According to historical accounts, after capturing the city, Khilji's forces set fire to the university, and the immense library was burned for months, with thousands of manuscripts and irreplaceable knowledge lost forever. This act was not only a blow to intellectualism in India but also a significant loss to global learning.
The destruction of Nalanda was part of a larger pattern of invasions during the medieval period, where cultural and educational institutions were targeted. The decline of such centers of learning had long-lasting effects on India's intellectual and scientific advancements.
However, Nalanda's legacy lives on. In recent years, efforts have been made to revive Nalanda University, with the establishment of a new campus in the region, aiming to bring back its spirit of academic excellence.
Thank you for this. Been watching your videos lately and I must say I am learning and appreaciating it a lot. Proud Sanatan from Malaysia!
ఓం నమఃశివాయ 🙏
We are from ujjain and our ancestors alive his legendry by story telling they define how he is mighty and awsm king of Indian history
Many thanks for sharing this information Harry ji 🙏
Since my birth i have been listening to this figure due to Nath panth literature being discussed at my home...especially guru gorakshnath , and bhartahari legendary conversation and his brother raja vikramaditya story et.
You can find more detail about chakravati samrat Vikramaditya in Bṛhatkathā (Sanskrit, "the Great Narrative") is an ancient Indian epic, said to have been written by Guṇāḍhya in a poorly-understood language known as Paiśācī (language spoken by spirits and ghosts). The work no longer exists but several later adaptations - the Kathāsaritsāgara (कथासरित्सागर), Bṛhatkathāmañjarī (बृहत्कथामंजरी) and Bṛhatkathāślokasaṃgraha (बृहत्कथाश्लोकसंग्रह) in Sanskrit, as well as the Peruṅkatai and Vasudevahiṃḍi in vernaculars
Yeah vikramaditya will never be forgotten
Vikramaditya family descendants exist till today in the region somewhere around South of Maharashtra and North of Karnataka.....
🎉😮😊
They no other than the Paramara Rajputs
Wow . Excellent history thank you prabhu. Coming from the West indies...
Unique video full of hard truth for further exploration&research to construct the factual history without any bias.
We are still ruled by British colonial laws , judiciary , education , colonial secularism.
Bharath government should incorporate Vikramaditya story in school books
People who are living a refugee life from Afghanistan in Delhi, mumbai like places can answer more efficiently to the question..like how Afghanistan was conquered..in places like iran iraq islam took over sanatan dharma in centuries of time..but the actual truth is they even left the countries without establishing muslim religion completely ..in their opinion everything is islamic but people who got converted they believe they’ve accepted humanity..now everybody knows how much human values are considered..
Samrat Chandra Gupta ii(Gupta Empire)is the real vikramaditya🇮🇳❤️🔥!
@@kishorek2272 No he is not !
Because before him Chanakya already mentioned Vikramaditya in his book.
@@kishorek2272 Is Samrat Chandra Gupta( Gupta Empire)is Chandra Gupta Maurya of Maurya dynasty? Plz reply me
@@amalnath6477no both are different with same name
But that argument doesn't explain Vikram samvat era
Vikram samvat is 2000 years ago
And chandragupta II was 1600 years ago
@@kishorek2272 no, gupta empire was established in 3rd century whereas Samrat Vikramaditya's reign was in 1st century, later many borrowed his name because of his widespread fame
JAI SHRI RAM
You are doing great work😊
Chandragupta II(Vikramaditya) of the Gupta Empire not Vikramaditya Empire defeated the Sakas and there is no evidence that he has ever conquered the Arabia
@@Knowledge-1111-e6 yeah you are right but he want views
@@proudhuman166 but puranas mention Vikramaditya and Gupta dynasty of rulers as to different person. In same way we have four Chandragupta.
@@breakingdrawn7008 that Vikramaditya is a Satavahana feudatory son of Gardabhilla from Ujjain and he didn't conquer till Arabia
@@gandaberunda6267Vikramaditya parmar defeated satavahanas and sakas both
@@gandaberunda6267 He doesn't needed to do that as there are nothing in Arabic land to conquer. But he did send brahmin to establish worship of Matkasvar Maharaj(Shiv) in kaba whom Arabic people have forgotten after indulging in material activities.
I've realized the cunningness of invaders. Why did they destroy our ancient universities like Nalanda?
Nalanda University, one of the oldest and most prestigious educational institutions in the world, was located in ancient India, near modern-day Bihar. It flourished from the 5th century CE and attracted scholars from all over Asia, including China, Korea, Japan, Tibet, Mongolia, Sri Lanka, and Southeast Asia. Nalanda was renowned for its vast library, which housed countless texts on subjects like Buddhism, philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine.
The destruction of Nalanda University is a tragic chapter in history. It was famously destroyed by the forces of Bakhtiyar Khilji, a Turkic Muslim invader, in 1193 CE. According to historical accounts, after capturing the city, Khilji's forces set fire to the university, and the immense library was burned for months, with thousands of manuscripts and irreplaceable knowledge lost forever. This act was not only a blow to intellectualism in India but also a significant loss to global learning.
The destruction of Nalanda was part of a larger pattern of invasions during the medieval period, where cultural and educational institutions were targeted. The decline of such centers of learning had long-lasting effects on India's intellectual and scientific advancements.
However, Nalanda's legacy lives on. In recent years, efforts have been made to revive Nalanda University, with the establishment of a new campus in the region, aiming to bring back its spirit of academic excellence.
Very good work! Thanks Harry💐
Where can I download Shukla-Ul-Azhar pdf with translation?
Vikram Samvat Panchang (Grah-Planets, Var-Day Starting from Sunrise, Tithi-Lunar Phases, Nakshatra-Constellations, Yoga-Union). Combining Lunar Plane and its intersection with Sun-Earth plane at Rahu & Ketu points and its 18 year rotation cycle is a Mathematical marval and advanced Trigonometry & Calculus. Calculating when the next Solar Eclipse will be with the hour and minute precision with Planetary alignment in its exact constellation placement. STILL NOT TAUGHT IN OUR SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS.
Thanks!
Glad you liked it! 🙏
Vikaram samvt ke baad Lodhi Samvat ka record dekhne milta history me
Total 8 Samvat kripaa karke us par detailed video baanye 🇮🇳🔱🙏🚩🚩🚩🚩
I am among few who knows about it, but what is shocking is that we don't have his any giant statue in country's capital.
Nepal also knows about him
❤❤❤❤❤ Thanks for sharing true information 👍 ❤❤❤❤
This account of Samrat Vikramaditya contains a mix of historical facts, folklore, and speculation. Let’s fact-check the claims systematically:
1. Did Vikramaditya Rule an Empire from Ujjain to Arabia?
No concrete historical evidence suggests that Samrat Vikramaditya ruled an empire stretching from India to Arabia, Iran, or Iraq.
Vikramaditya is a legendary title used by several Indian kings, particularly from the Gupta Dynasty (Chandragupta II, 375-415 CE) and later rulers.
The most famous Vikramaditya is Chandragupta II Vikramaditya, who defeated the Western Kshatrapas but did not rule over Arabia.
The Vikram Samvat calendar (57 BCE) is traditionally attributed to King Vikramaditya of Ujjain, but his historical existence remains debated.
2. Did Vikramaditya Defeat the Sakas?
Yes, but not exactly as described.
The Sakas (Scythians) were Iranian-origin invaders who established kingdoms in India around the 1st century BCE.
The Saka invasions were stopped by rulers like Chandragupta II Vikramaditya (Gupta dynasty) and Rudradaman I (Western Kshatrapas).
The complete eradication of the Sakas is a myth, as Saka rulers continued ruling parts of India for centuries.
3. Did the Huns (Xiongnu) Push the Sakas into India?
Partially true.
The Xiongnu (Huns) and Sakas (Scythians) were distinct but related nomadic groups.
The Sakas were displaced by the Yuezhi (Kushans) rather than the Xiongnu.
The Sakas entered India around the 1st century BCE, while the Huns invaded India in the 5th century CE.
4. Did Vikramaditya Establish a "Ram Rajya"?
This is folklore, not history.
The idea of a Ram Rajya (ideal kingdom of Lord Rama) is used as a symbolic concept.
No historical records prove that a Vikramaditya ruler created an ideal kingdom explicitly based on Ram Rajya.
5. Did Vikramaditya Rule for Over 100 Years?
Highly unlikely.
No historical king has ruled for over 100 years in recorded history.
The lifespan of historical kings generally ranged between 40-70 years.
6. Is Vikramaditya Mentioned in Arabic and Persian Texts?
No solid evidence supports this claim.
The supposed inscription in Istanbul's Maktab-e-Sultania Library has never been verified.
Arabic sources from the pre-Islamic era rarely mention Indian kings.
7. Is the Vikram Samvat Calendar Linked to Vikramaditya?
Yes, but the origin is debated.
The Vikram Samvat calendar began in 57 BCE, but historians argue whether it was actually started by a historical Vikramaditya or later attributed to him.
Some scholars suggest it may have been introduced by the Malwa kings or Saka rulers themselves.
8. Are Betal Pachisi and Singhasan Battisi Reliable Historical Records?
No, these are literary works, not historical accounts.
Betal Pachisi (Baital Pachisi) and Singhasan Battisi are medieval fables that glorify Vikramaditya but do not serve as reliable history.
They were written centuries after the supposed events took place.
Conclusion:
This story blends history and legend. While a historical Vikramaditya (likely Chandragupta II) defeated the Sakas, many claims-such as ruling an empire up to Arabia, fighting the Huns, and ruling for 100 years-lack historical evidence and seem to be later mythological additions.
Sorry to say. But puranas are more than concrete prove that he existed and he is part of living memory of bharat and it's people. The problem is that we are so driven by western narrative we overlook our own sources and tradition.
Rarely said by Arabs??
Lol that rare is an outstanding achievement in the path of truth
Can u decipher me this?
Very informative and authentic video. Keep it up 👍
Yes😊😊we have the Vikram Samvat calendar .
The biggest problem is the different historical facts in different texts. We were taught King Vikramaditya's original name King Chandragupta -II. His father's name was King Samudragupta who was known as "Napoleon of India". You are telling us something else. 🙏🙏🙏
Agree
You arr wrong and leant wrong history...
What about Vikram samvat era which was 350-400 years before the chandragupta II?
We are the descendants of Maharaja Vikramaditya... Nothing could get bigger than this
*Chakravarti Samrat Vikramaditya* Ruler of Asian Continent named *Jambudweepa* and architect of Sone ki Chidiya *Bharatvarsha* and later on Whoever became Samrat of Bharat adopted his name as Title eg: Samudragupta Vikramaditya, Chandragupta Vikramaditya, Skandagupta Vikramaditya, Hemchand (Hemu) Vikramaditya who fought Akbar and Behram Khan Mughal….
After britishers looted 60+ trillion usd from India 🇮🇳 our nation became poverty stricken after 1947..
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏👍 Jai Bharat 🙏🙏
A movie needed of the great vikramaditya ❤
Satyameva jayathe
Excellent information love you
Can't crosscheck your references about the Turkish library and the Arabic text which you mentioned. Can you give exact link for the same ?
The reference to King Vikramaditya’s inscription in the Turkish library, specifically Sayar-ul-Okul from Makhtab-e-Sultania, is often cited in alternative historical narratives, most notably in the works of P. N. Oak. However, it is important to note that mainstream historians and academic sources do not recognize the existence of this manuscript or library.
@harrysahota_hh I am not able to find Makhtab-e-Sultania Library at the first place. Do they have any website ?
In reality there is no such works bro , people like him and other right wing Hindus have been claiming that they there is ancient arabic literature sayar okul or something,i have been asking for documents since 5 yrs they just spam same lines ,it's a fake made thing , arabic wasn't developed back in 1st century,it was a evolving language and books and literature wasn't produced in arabia back then
@@sahais2012just google it
@@sahais2012nahi milega ese
Muje bhi nahi mila search karne par
Aapko kuch mil jaye to batana
Very interesting history! We really do need to rewrite our history books openly!!
Kafi log bol rhe h historians vikramaditya ko mythical bolte the..😂😂 mujhe to vikramaditya hmesha se mahan samrat mante hu...pheli baar suna inko bhi mythical mana jata tha by vampathi distorians
Vikramaditya konsi jaati me aate hai btao 🤔
Jai ho.🙏. Maharaja Samarth
Vikramaditya....
Great!
Explanation very nice 👍 sir, Highly appreciated ❤
Gupta empire
----------------------
Chandragupta I
Samudragupta
Chandragupta II = Vikramaditya
I know that argument
But that doesn't explain Vikram samvat era
So does it mean that chandragupta maurya came much before Vikramaditya?
There was no single king called Vikramaditya. It was a title bestowed upon various kings. Gupta rulers - Chandragupta II , Skandagupta used this title. Also, there are so many inaccuracies in this video. Mahkumbha was started by Adi Shankaracharya who lived in ninth century CE. King Amshu Varma of Nepal lived in 7th century.
I think you shd check his details in Rome's history and Vikram Sen was exactly called Vikramaditya, you may have your version but MP has scriptures, Puranas too, Arabia, Turkey, Rome.
So, called Congressi Historian none of them graduated from History, ancient studies, Archeological studies.
@prithvi818 Please give me the sources names and I will look up. I don't believe in any version on the face value regardless of the political affiliation. As much as I would love to believe this, I want to look things for myself and time periods are important to confirm that multiple sources are referring to the same Vikramaditya
Who say you kumbh start by adi Sankara?? It's a oldest festival even mention in veda
@@lipun1531 Vedas don't mention about Kumbh Mela as a festival. It only mentions about samudramanthan and the amrit kumbha. So these are pious places. You can take a dip anyday.
@@alphavar729 read chalukya history, 2 kings name will come, vikramadithya 1, vikramadithya 2, also read about vinya adithya and Immadi pulikeshi,
King son names chooses very wisely, without any reason they don't keep wrong name, also Indian navy IAC vikramadithya simply not kept
Yes, in the Alwar district of Rajasthan, there is a famous site in the Aravalli hills where Raja Bharathari (Bhartrihari) is believed to have performed tapasya (penance). This place is known as Bhartrihari Temple (Bharathari Nath Temple) and is a significant pilgrimage site for devotees, especially those following Nath Sampradaya.
Please also make video on how yudhisther became chakarvarti samrat how 4 pandavas conquered all kingdoms
Great video ❤❤
Sir where can I get the source for this
@@ThunderLord-v1j in the description
Really appreciate to put this kind of true video on true history bases 🙏🏻
Thanks a lot for this information.
living in which forests ? Who were these Huns ? and where did they live geographically ?
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥✅
Thanks for bringing this up. Vikramaditya is most often confused with other kings with same name. I personally think a group of academics should firm a committee and trace all hindu kings from before Ramayan till Muslim invasions. Also if King Vikramaditya's history comes out it will change the history written by west.
Our history books should first teach our history till the time we can recount thereafter should teach world history
Excellent explanation
Salute to our hero.
Thank you for posting such a great king story. Such things inspire the young generation. How is it even possible to communicate with remote areas from his capital city? (My father told me he used to practice "Parakaya Pravesha" to travel such a long distance and rule with clear vigilance.
MPPSC introduced Gardbhill dynasty (Vikramaditya's dynasty) as part of Ancient MP history just last year.
Is Gardbhill a typo?
Is it the same Vikramaditya who had a brother by the name of Batti?
I remember reading a Kannada book from my mother's library on Vikramaditya (I think almost around Thousand pages book). The way his valor and just behaviour had been described in the book, I had truly thought at that time that it was a fictional story
Very nice
Jai shree Krishna
We MUST update our history books
According to the Text named "Jyōthirvidhābharanam"written by the great poet kāl'idāsa,he mentioned that he started to writeen his book at 1000BCE means 3000 years ago so most of the mainstream historians will not accept that time period but its a quite logical because the later powers like the Roman Empire was not formed at that time...!😊
Why you don’t give reference books volume /Chapter/page? 😅
I have read Amar Chitra Katha's comic on Chandragupta Vikramaditya,was fascinated by his
valour. Wondered people mentioned
only the other Vikramaditya.
valour. Wondered people only mentioned the story of the other Vikramaditya (who answered to ques
valour. Often wondered why people mention only the Vikramaditya who replied to the little ghost which then ba
Jai jagannath
Amazing
Maka a video on sudhanva Chauhan also , he was 300 years ago before Vikramadity
You mentioned bactria again I assume it is the same as bahlika kingdom?
Great explanation..
Thank you
What a History India has 👏👏🗿
Our history is the oldest, rich culture, full of mighty kings and warriors.
Sorry to say the bitter Truth but other communities came after that time with different fake ideology is just not comparable to Indian history. ✌️
There is a reason for why they declare him as a myth. If you are familiar with Kota V's and recently Vedveer Aryas work, the dating of Chandragupta Mauraya controversy, you will know exactly why. Vikramaditya in century 100BCE is supposed to have started the samvat era by defeating all the foreign kings like Sakas, Yavanas, Phallavs etc. But since they date Chandragupta Mauraya to the century 300BCE and consider him to have defeated the Greeks, Vikramaditya's history does not fit and hence they reject him as mythical. Not just that, but they juggle around Indian dates. So the Puranas place 1200 years between Mauraya and the Yavanas. But they have made them contemporary. The Puranas also say the Sakas come before the Greeks, but they have placed the Sakas after the Greeks. The Indian records and inscriptions say Saka era starts in around 600BCE and ends in around 100BCE, they place the start at 100CE. Even though we know India was under Persian rule in 600BCE, who were also Iranians. We also know from looking at Mauryan art and coins they have no Greek Hellenic influence at all and clearly belong to an older era. Unfortunately we can't scientifically date yet non carbon items, or it would have been obvious by now the Mauryan punch marked coins are not from 300BCE but around 1500BCE. But recently we now have indirect evidence from carbon dating proving it. Carbon dating of the shrine Ashoka built at Lumbini Nepal, showing dates of early site cultivation 1300BCE and now carbon dating of the late Gupta bower manuscript to 200CE, meaning early 300BCE was early Gupta. Thus we can now prove Vikramaditya is Chandragupta 2 of the Gupta era, also known as Vikram Aditya.
Guys they have totally messed up our dates and chronology. It is the duty of independent Indians now to correct it.
Very good info thanks
Great gob sir ❤
Jai shree Ram
Jai King Vikramaditya
A king with largest areas in the world
Jai sree ram 💪💪💪💪
Tks,v v interesting n proud