Ave Maria! Thank you for this Tea With Mary Fr. Rosario. I very much like when the Clergy is not afraid neither confused about what are the Church teachings. Its very reassuring for us who everyday almost now are bombarded with heresies, falsehoods, political correctness, and all sorts of anti Christian values, and being almost forced to embrace them in our work places, educational institutions, public spaces, and even in family and friendship relations. Not to mention, within the Church. Love the sinner but hate the sin. We must remind ourselves that relativism is not what guide us as Catholics.
how wonderful to hear you Father! I live in Wales and the recent group of Nigerians- many who are devout christians all very concerned to find a church here that have re-oriented away from the gospel. I tell them always go to the traditional mass, pray the rosary. I also give them a tee-shirt "Black Bishops Matter" with a picture of Cardinal Sarah emblazoned on it.
I am a 75-year-old cradle Catholic and in my wild nightmares, I never imagined this would happen. The chaos this has caused has the devil doing a happy dance.
A dicastry document is open to private interpretation you can take it or leave it, it is not a papal document which is binding and so Pope Francis could end any debates by making the dicastry document a papal document and yet he didn’t which begs the question why.
What's your community's view of obedience even when you disagree (which is nearly always the case with obedience) with your superiors? Yeah I thought so🙄
What do they hope to achieve in obtaining some blessings as a couple? Priests can bless them all they want but it is really God who will bestow the blessing. That’s my non-theological opinion. Just a Grandma opinion. As to their accusation of hatred on the part of the church if they are refused the blessing, it’s classic wokeness and political correctness which they learn from universities, government institutions, etc. we shouldn’t even respond to such allegations. If I refuse feeding sugary stuff to a child with diabetes, I wouldn’t be doing it because I hate the child. I’ll be praying even more for the church and all our ministers and for them too that they’ll see the error of their ways before they meet our creator .
Sounds like you don’t fully understand the term? Mary-is not as the origin of the graces, but as a conduit. What offence is there? Mary’s title of mediatrix arises from her cooperation in the Incarnation and in the Redemption of mankind. Through her “yes” (Lk 1:38), she became the Theotokos (God-bearer), and, as the “New Eve,” she is “the Mother of all living.” Irenaeus (A.D. 120-200) wrote, “As by a virgin the human race had been bound to death, by a virgin it is saved, the balance being preserved, a virgin’s disobedience by a virgin’s obedience” (Against Heresies, 3, 22, 19). Eve made the Fall possible, but Adam effected it; Mary made our Redemption possible (by consenting to bring the Savior into the world), but Jesus effected it.
Let us use precision in language: "co redemptrix" is tooooo easy to misinterpt y people who already ,& mistakenly think we deify Mary .let us say,Mary a created being,prevenienly kept a pure vessel as the bearer of baby Jesus,gave free will assent to being an important part of salvation history we should keep in mind that Jesus,had both. A divine nature,as well as human..
""" many Protestants argue that Peter can’t be the rock of the Church in Matthew 16:18 because Jesus is said to be the foundation of the Church in 1 Corinthians 3:11. The assumption here is that what is said of one cannot be said of the other. But Jesus’ revelation that we are the light of the world proves this assumption to be false. Consider that Jesus calls himself “the light of the world” in John 9:5. For Jesus, the metaphor of “the light of the world” can be applied to both He and Christians. So, it’s simply false to think that since the foundation metaphor is applied to Jesus it can’t be applied also to Peter. The metaphor can be applied to both. Another objection where “the light of the world” reference comes into play is the objection that the saints can’t be intercessors because Jesus is “the one mediator between God and man” (1 Tim. 2:5). Like the objection above, the assumption here is that what is said of one cannot be said of the other. But, again, this assumption is false given that Jesus calls himself the light of the world and us as Christians. The assumption here is that if a word or motif is used for two people, it must mean the same thing for both of them-they must be equal with regard to that word or motif. Jesus’ reference to Christians as “the light of the world,” knowing that He calls himself “the light of the world,” proves this assumption to be false. Surely, Christians are not equal to Jesus in being “the light of the world.” "" Here is the full podcast: www.catholic.com/audio/scw/fifth-sunday-of-ordinary-time-year-a Hopefully this will help you to understand but I encourage you to do more research and above all to pray to God to show you the truth. catholic.com has a lot of things about the accusations that the titles of Mediatrix or Corredemptrix are wrong. It is a great place to start to see WHY and how Catholics use this title. May God bless you brother/sister in Christ
What a great episode. Thank you very much Father!
Ave Maria Fr🙏
Ave Maria! Thank you for this Tea With Mary Fr. Rosario. I very much like when the Clergy is not afraid neither confused about what are the Church teachings. Its very reassuring for us who everyday almost now are bombarded with heresies, falsehoods, political correctness, and all sorts of anti Christian values, and being almost forced to embrace them in our work places, educational institutions, public spaces, and even in family and friendship relations. Not to mention, within the Church. Love the sinner but hate the sin. We must remind ourselves that relativism is not what guide us as Catholics.
The solution for our times is the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and we can all do our small part to usher it in.
Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, (;-D yeah well, i hope Mary comes thru for you.
Amen and Amen!
how wonderful to hear you Father! I live in Wales and the recent group of Nigerians- many who are devout christians all very concerned to find a church here that have re-oriented away from the gospel. I tell them always go to the traditional mass, pray the rosary. I also give them a tee-shirt "Black Bishops Matter" with a picture of Cardinal Sarah emblazoned on it.
Deo Gratias 🙏🏾
I am a 75-year-old cradle Catholic and in my wild nightmares, I never imagined this would happen. The chaos this has caused has the devil doing a happy dance.
Jesus Jesus Jesus 🙏❤️
Reach out in TRUTH according to church teachings
A dicastry document is open to private interpretation you can take it or leave it, it is not a papal document which is binding and so Pope Francis could end any debates by making the dicastry document a papal document and yet he didn’t which begs the question why.
What's your community's view of obedience even when you disagree (which is nearly always the case with obedience) with your superiors? Yeah I thought so🙄
What do they hope to achieve in obtaining some blessings as a couple? Priests can bless them all they want but it is really God who will bestow the blessing. That’s my non-theological opinion. Just a Grandma opinion.
As to their accusation of hatred on the part of the church if they are refused the blessing, it’s classic wokeness and political correctness which they learn from universities, government institutions, etc. we shouldn’t even respond to such allegations. If I refuse feeding sugary stuff to a child with diabetes, I wouldn’t be doing it because I hate the child. I’ll be praying even more for the church and all our ministers and for them too that they’ll see the error of their ways before they meet our creator .
Not all priest, but seems priests nowadays become priests for the title, benefits and practicing homosexuality. This is not the priesthood!
This guy is a Catholic priest?!?!
I hope the vatican comes out with a document a day. (;-D
Only God is the mediatrix of all graces you offend both God and our blessed mother with this title it is a plot of satan❤
Sounds like you don’t fully understand the term? Mary-is not as the origin of the graces, but as a conduit. What offence is there? Mary’s title of mediatrix arises from her cooperation in the Incarnation and in the Redemption of mankind. Through her “yes” (Lk 1:38), she became the Theotokos (God-bearer), and, as the “New Eve,” she is “the Mother of all living.”
Irenaeus (A.D. 120-200) wrote, “As by a virgin the human race had been bound to death, by a virgin it is saved, the balance being preserved, a virgin’s disobedience by a virgin’s obedience” (Against Heresies, 3, 22, 19). Eve made the Fall possible, but Adam effected it; Mary made our Redemption possible (by consenting to bring the Savior into the world), but Jesus effected it.
Let us use precision in language: "co redemptrix" is tooooo easy to misinterpt y people who already ,& mistakenly think we deify Mary .let us say,Mary a created being,prevenienly kept a pure vessel as the bearer of baby Jesus,gave free will assent to being an important part of salvation history we should keep in mind that Jesus,had both. A divine nature,as well as human..
Why is your name Mary?!
Who cares what Protestants think, they don't really even know who Jesus is. They're ignorant beyond understanding!
""" many Protestants argue that Peter can’t be the rock of the Church in Matthew 16:18 because Jesus is said to be the foundation of the Church in 1 Corinthians 3:11. The assumption here is that what is said of one cannot be said of the other.
But Jesus’ revelation that we are the light of the world proves this assumption to be false. Consider that Jesus calls himself “the light of the world” in John 9:5. For Jesus, the metaphor of “the light of the world” can be applied to both He and Christians.
So, it’s simply false to think that since the foundation metaphor is applied to Jesus it can’t be applied also to Peter. The metaphor can be applied to both.
Another objection where “the light of the world” reference comes into play is the objection that the saints can’t be intercessors because Jesus is “the one mediator between God and man” (1 Tim. 2:5). Like the objection above, the assumption here is that what is said of one cannot be said of the other. But, again, this assumption is false given that Jesus calls himself the light of the world and us as Christians.
The assumption here is that if a word or motif is used for two people, it must mean the same thing for both of them-they must be equal with regard to that word or motif. Jesus’ reference to Christians as “the light of the world,” knowing that He calls himself “the light of the world,” proves this assumption to be false. Surely, Christians are not equal to Jesus in being “the light of the world.” ""
Here is the full podcast:
www.catholic.com/audio/scw/fifth-sunday-of-ordinary-time-year-a
Hopefully this will help you to understand but I encourage you to do more research and above all to pray to God to show you the truth.
catholic.com has a lot of things about the accusations that the titles of Mediatrix or Corredemptrix are wrong.
It is a great place to start to see WHY and how Catholics use this title.
May God bless you brother/sister in Christ