The ram timings were not talked about in this video, but they are very important. When the DDR5 was underclocked at 3600, the timings were probably still CL36 or something around that. DDR4 3600 is usually CL 14, 16 or 18. Much tighter. This explains why the FPS were worse on the DDR5 3600 . The timings should have been discussed or at least given so we could have a better idea how they affect the results.
Agreed, for workload purposes the higher frequency can be an advantage but for gaming the Cas Latency is frequently overlooked. A CL36 with a 5600MHz DDR5 kit has a responce time of about 12.86 nanoseconds and a CL16 3600MHz DDR4 kit has roughly an 8.89 nanosecond responce time. Bigger numbers doesn't always mean better. For those who want to work out their RAM responce time it's CL multiplied by 2000 divided by the frequency to give an answer in nanoseconds.
Videos like this are SUPER helpful to those trying to navigate the "new and shiny" products and wondering if you are really getting a performance uplift compared to "older/previous generation" products that are cheaper! Thank you good sir
not exactly helpful. as one commenter above already stated: The ram timings were not talked about in this video, but they are very important. When the DDR5 was underclocked at 3600, the timings were probably still CL36 or something around that. DDR4 3600 is usually CL 14, 16 or 18. Much tighter. This explains why the FPS were worse on the DDR5 3600 . The timings should have been discussed or at least given so we could have a better idea how they affect the results.
@@robertanthonybermudez5545 you are arguing for the sake of small percentages in performance, the vast majority of users simply won't be able to tell a difference.
@@colinhoover5153 if its not clear for you, I am pointing out the uncertainties in the TESTING METHOD. never I have mentioned any percentages significant or not.
@@robertanthonybermudez5545 did you tune into PC Centric and expect to see Steve or perhaps Tech Notice giving a full in depth breakdown of DDR5 vs DDR4? You may give beef for his "testing methods" but perhaps a change of expectation is needed here
@@colinhoover5153 of course! testing methods are standardized for the very reason of reliability. whoever youtuber uploads a content comparing performances, wether that be a small youtuber or big channels like LTT, i expect the same standard.
"it's all about value" after testing on a 4090 and ignoring the GPU cost in the £/frame calculations. If someone spends £1800 on a GPU, they're spending £450+ on the MB and CPU, and £100+ on the RAM. If spending an extra £100 on RAM nets even a 5% FPS increase, compared to the 4% price increase, that's Better value for money.
If you only changed the memory speed on the DDR5 when testing the lower speeds, then the sloppier timings of DDR5 can massively hold it back, it really needs the higher speed to help counter it’s slower timings. I’ve found that tightening timings usually tends to yield a better performance gain than a faster speed when OC’ing RAM
Punctual reply here, I imagine it depends on what you're doing. Ddr4 can act on data faster, DDR5 can act on more data at once. If you're not moving large chunks in and out of memory constantly, ddr4 is equal to or better than DDR5. If one kit can move up to 1GB of data and the process takes 1 seconds, and another moves up to 10GB but it takes 2 seconds for the process, then the second kit obviously moves more data. But if the largest transfer is only ever 1MB, the first kit is completing the task twice as fast. Thats the difference between latency and clock speed. Clock is like your "time budget" , how many things it can do in one second, and latency is how much of that budget it costs to perform a given command. People look at the max bandwidth alone and conclude DDR5 is just better by default, but if you're doing anything other than benchmarks, you're wasting money most of the time. Games primarily use the VRAM for everything, if you run out of it and it hits the system ram, it doesn't matter how fast your ram or it's bandwidth, it's gonna be slower than aids. Ideally in that scenario you'd want as little data xfer as possible with the best access times possible. I think, I might be making this all up, am I making it up? Nah...id never do that...come on what do you take me for? Come on, I'm not that kinda guy come on ..
@@brovid-19 I understand your point, but if you’re making direct comparisons between ram kits and only altering the speeds without a care about timings then you will lose performance and it can directly impact frame rates - this comment is from over a year ago though so I can’t remember exactly why I left it or what happened lmao
This was almost a perfectly executed test. I just wished that both kits were the same size and not 16g vs 32g. The video had the potential to be perfect but the idea that the ram kits aren't the same same size , I did appreciate that you tested the ddr5 at 3600mhz. I figure if or when ddr5 is more mainstream and 5200-6000 kits with better timings are a thing only then will there be an substantial increase over 3600 ddr4.
I actually find it refreshing how you make it clear you're not going to test at 1080P because of the GPU you're using, similar with the max settings in SOTTR. People focus too much on arbitrary numbers especially when it comes to things like DDR5 and then tend to give bad advice on the back of that. I like how your benchmarks are relative to what people are actually going to be running on a daily basis.
I agree, but I think it's more realistic that somebody would run either 1080p or 4k as a 4k monitors scales down to that. With 1440p you're kinda stuck there. So for real demanding games or games where refresh really matters you might super sample from 1080 with ultra everything and RT on (or is that just me?!) Generally today's 1440p card is tomorrows 1080p ultra card and so on.
I bought a new PC last week: an i5-13600KF with 32 GB of DDR4 3600 MHz memory and an ASUS Strix Z690-A Gaming WiFi D4 motherboard. I did consider DDR5 memory but the price plus more expensive motherboards pushed me towards DDR4 which I think was a good choice after watching numerous DDR4 vs DDR5 comparison videos on RUclips. I play games at 1440p with maxed out settings and RT, if available, on a RTX 3080 so I feel I have a well-balanced system for what it cost me. Yes, I could have future-proofed it by investing in DDR5 now but, honestly, by the time I next upgrade my PC, DDR6 or DDR7 will be around as my previous PC (i7-4770K with 16 GB DDR3 1600 memory) last me almost 10 years!
Did pretty much the same and more than happy as I reused my DDR4 3600 RAM so saved a fair bit on the motherboard CPU upgrade. Luckily I bought the Strix-D4 as well with the cashback offer from ASUS so even more savings...
Future proofing is a myth. Coming from a PC builder for 20+ years, just buy what you need now, and use that saved money on better parts. By the time you actually need to upgrade, there will be many more choices for a much better price. There is absolutely no reason to buy parts that you don't need and can't take advantage of now, just to bet that you will be ok with those said parts in the future. In a way, you are actually limiting yourself from the many options you can have in the future, and that's the only "future-proof" you'll get.
I went 13600k and DDR5 because I run servers while gaming, I can definately tell a huge difference from DDR4, but that's just me most people wouldnt notice anything at all. It does make me comfortable though spending that money on DDR5 because personally I think it's worth it, and while there's no thing such as future proofing, I am quite confident I will be able to use my ram sticks in a few years time without feeling held back because of my motherboard choice, like I did with my previous RAM sticks which had 2666MHz.. So a huge upgrade.. I also do work with my PC, so things such as Photoshop work so much more cleanly. But just for gaming obviously you should wait to buy DDR5 thats what I'd say.
@@DubboU i get what your saying but using a little more then you need on lets say a graphic card maybe mean that in 1 or 2 years will be very playable and enjoyable, instead of having to buy a new graphics card just because you went from CSGO which can be played on anything to a card that has to run elden ring or God of War. Personally i bought a 2080 in 2018 and used 100$ extra as opposed to a 2070, and im very happy with the decision even though i didnt really need the 2080 until cyberpunk came out. "future proofing" is most likely going from 1700 to 1900 or 2000 not going from a 700 build to a 3000 dollar build in my experience.
This is exactly why I haven't upgraded my RAM to DDR5 yet. No need. Marginal (at best) gains for more price. The only logical reason for buying DDR5 right now is if you are currently building a "future proof" rig that you plan on keeping for many years to come. Otherwise, if you are in my boat, where upgrading is the option, then it just isn't worth it. Not yet anyway. One day that extra speed will be worth it though.
I completely agree with your future proofing comment cause I'm in the situation where I need to future proof my incoming PC, as my older one is DDR3. I agree with you on specifically your 'one day' comment. Which is correct, at some point (like it happened with DDR2vsDDR3 and DDR3vsDDR4) the speeds and capabilities of DDR5 are going to exceed anything DDR4 can do. Probably a few gens from now. So, you're right, if you are in your position, hold back and then when you actually see it surpassing DDR4 speeds permanently, then you can go for it.
Depends on your current pc. For people like me who are still on ddr3, it makes sense to go straight to ddr5 than ddr4 seeing as this is the last generation of ddr4:)
@@xyr3s Yes, but that is kinda what I was getting at. Someone coming from DDR3 is basically building a whole new rig at this point. At least the core MOBO components, that is. So yes, I agree it depends on the specific PC. I am just saying that for me personally, it makes no sense at the moment. DDR5 isn't going to give me any substantial gains over what I have. One day it will though, so I am holding out. Those, like you, that are moving up generations and having to make a huge change with core components, you might as well go straight to DDR5 to future proof your system. So we are basically saying the same thing, just in different ways.
@@BarbarianAncestry Definitely. I am thinking that once 14th or even 15th gen Intel chips drop, I will then look at upgrading my system. At that point, DDR5 will be the standard, so it would make sense for me personally. Right now I am going to ride out my 11700k with DDR4 because it does the perfectly well. Probably will take this time to focus on upgrading to a 40 series GPU at some point (waiting to see if the 4070 will be a value buy or if I should wait until a 4080 gets more reasonably priced), even though my 3070 has served me well. Then when the time comes, I will be ready to make the jump to DDR5 with a new Mobo, CPU, SSD, etc. But everything is tentative. I am more in the mindset of upgrading when I need to, not when I want to. We will see though. I get the "itch" to buy parts at the most random times lol
For something as essential as RAM, I'm amazed so few channels have covered this subject as well as this, for ordinary chaps deciding which way to swing. Also, your vid on the relative performance of DDR4 at different MHz speeds is essential viewing if going DDR4. Ta muchly.
I get there's a difference between 60fps and 144fps but when these cards are averaging into the 200's you just got to feel like there's no point worrying about the numbers by that point.
@@Safetytrousers Yet.... AMD has said they are continuing to support the AM4 platform for a while longer so we may see more versions of x3D chips/refreshes and even zen 4 which they originally planned so we might get more improved CPUs for the platform at some point
@@exoticspeedefy7916 Chances are continued support means BIOS and chipset updates, and continuation of existing CPUs. AMD do want sales of AM5 and what better way to boost that than by only making new x3d chips for AM5.
Would you consider testing these components for different applications, like Premier Pro, Lightroom, Photoshop etc? Those are supposedly very RAM dependent
@@latlanticcityphil yes... We are talking about gaming in this video.. which is why I asked for a video concerning content creation... What's the point you're trying to make lmao
I can tell a huge difference especially multitasking in-between Adobe software, like photoshop and premiere pro. It works so much more seamlessly compared to my older DDR4 sticks and having a few extra tabs open on chrome wont hurt me then either :)
@@B.D.E. ?? Well, as someone who already built a ddr5 system and a ddr4 system. At 1440p, at best, i saw 5% FPS difference. And you don't have to take my word for it. Look at HUB benchmarks, to Linus, to Gamernexsus, to Jay2cents. Pretty much all of them show there is barely any difference between the two at 1440p, and especially at 4k. Not sure where you're getting your source from? Looks like i am still sticking to being "glad".
It's really simple. DDR5 is in the exact same stage and DDR4 was and DDR3 etc etc. In the beginning it's a new, better product BUT the timings are nearly 3-4x higher. The best of the best DDR4 (out of the box w/o manual OC's) is 4000mhz CL14 compared to say G. Skill 6400mhz CL32 - that's the lowest/quickest DDR5 I've seen. I'm likely still going to wait. I have a Z690 DDR4 board with 64gb of 4000mhz CL14 and the price to performance just isn't there. The only situations where it would make sense would be if you are actually building a brand new computer or you're doing something that actually utilizes ram way more than gaming. Current DDR5 prices have dropped a fair bit so now is the time to def buy it but I'm still not blown away why the latencies. $180-190 for 6000mhz 36 / 38 latency. Meh. Then add on another $300-500 for a decent DDR5 mobo.
Lol dude first of all the reason your having worse performance with ddr5 at lower clock speeds is because ddr5 has much higher timings. Also why would you do 4K benchmarks with upscaling? Your basically just rendering at 1440p internally anyways so it’s not a real 4K benchmark.
Thanks for making all the videos you do, lots have helped me w building my desktop when I did and nowadays I watch bc you have good video ideas elite video quality and editing. Thanks! Great work!
This is interesting... I upgraded my processor from an i7 8700K to a i9 13900KS so I practically had to upgrade everything anyways. Got the ASUS ROG Maximus Hero z790 mobo so I'm forced to get DDR5 now. Kinda went stupid with my build and got the 128GB of Corsair Vengeance 5600 MHz RAM while running a RTX 3090 which I'm sure my GPU is going to bottleneck my new system for now. I still don't regret it though, as I'm sure my system is major future proof except the GPU.
What about games that actually use ram? Not just basic selection of mainstream games. But games that do a lot of generating, like: teardown, 7 days to die or minecraft.
Where it mattered (like not limited elsewhere), I think the DDR5 performance difference was unexpectedly huge! 6 or 7% increase in FPS is more than most overclocking of CPU or GPU will deliver despite costing 100s of additional watts. But that's just me.
@@heikghey captain, land it to me straight, got a desktop 2 months ago with ddr4 3600 and now thinking of getting ddr5 6000, tell me, will i be wasting money and neurons?
One money saving advantage of DDR5 is that you get DDR4 dual-channel performance on a single channel DDR5 installation. Hence, if you start with 16GB single channel DDR5, you can just add another stick of 16GB later to get 32GB, whereas with DDR4, having 2x 8GB sticks, you'd have to chuck them both out and buy 2x 16GB sticks, or run 4x 8GB sticks. As we know, DDR4 is quite restricted when running on a single channel and does need to run dual-channel. Also, if you upgrade the MB for the next-gen CPUs in 2024+, will they may only have DDR5 versions, so your DDR4 could not be re-used? So, going DDR5 now could be a more future-proof option.
By the time you're upgrading your motherboard next time there will be lot faster DDR5 RAM around. The current DDR5 kits will all look slow in comparison. So smart call is to go with DDR4 motherboard especially if you have decent DDR4 kit laying around right now.
Because the 6000MHz DDR5 ram you'll buy now will be compatible with the 9000MHz DDR5 you'll buy in a year? Get real dude and just accept you wasted your money.
It would be nice to have benchmarks for lower graphics settings which wouldn't actually bottleneck at GPU level and probably yield a performance increase on the faster memory. Max settings is good for showing off a new GPU, but out in the real world, a lot of gamers would sacrifice graphical fidelity for raw FPS gains.
Ddr5 is actually pretty clutch, I got a 16gb stick of it for like $70ish and it’s much better than my original 16gb ddr4 kit on my old mobo that was $120
The fact you did not mention the MHz or the CL tell me you bought the shittiest DDR5 on the market that is probably giving you worse FPS than a normal DDR4 ram stick.
DDR5 typically has much slower latency timings, despite DDR5 as being advertised as "faster" it usually has twice the operation lag. Where DDR5 truly shines is when you're creating content, rendering, editing playback, etc, the extra speed (and most times, capacity) can massively help overcome system lag or desynchronizing Great video Marcus 👌
I went out of my way to get a DDR4 computer rather than DDR5. I seem to recall a similar issue with DDR3 or maybe when DDR4 first came out. It was ages ago.
I play warzone almost exclusively with a 7950x and a 4090. According to my pc I’m using 33 of 64 gigs of my ddr5 ram at 6000 mhz. I get consistent 250-300 fps on very high 2k settings. My Alienware monitors only do 240hz of 2k though.
thanks for posting this im feeling a bit better now about going with my 32gb of 6000mhz ddr5, because after this video and reading alot of the comments i was a bit unsure
Loved your energy and the testing. I'm not sure if it would make a difference, but I would like to see tests with intensive scenarios in the games such as dense firefights and extreme settings. Maybe there are significant differences there compared to tranquil walks around the map? Great video though. I was looking forward to upgrading to a DDR5 build... WAS.
Why only 16GB DDR4 and 32GB DDR5 across the board? If you think 16GB is still enough for high-end gaming, you're wrong. Hell, I have a game that can use over 48GB. That _is_ an edge case though (DCS), but many modern titles have me using 18-22GB or so in total, with only the game, Steam and MSI Afterburner running. And even after upgrading to 64GB RAM, Windows always finds something to use it for. It's all cache to Mr. Gates. You might say he likes swimming in cache.
I agree i really thought ddr5 would have a more of a difference to be honest, however i'm actually really releived about it. I'm running a basic set up witha asus strix 1080ti 11gb 3600mhz ddr4 ram on a old asus strix 6th gen board with a i7 6700k cpu and was really considering a expensive leap to ddr5 ram motherboard cpu & gpu upgrade until I watched this. ddr4 seems to be the way to go which is a lot easier on the wallet to say the least lol. Awesome content by the way man appreciate the solid intel on what gamers should or shouldn't buy this content saved my wallet big time!
This was a very useful video. It clearly shows at 4k ram speeds do not make a difference. But at lower resolutions ram speeds make more of a difference. It would be good to see the results for a lower end system in 1080p and 1440p. Ie 13600k with a 3080 and 6600xt
@@rinse3x what did you go with and how do you feel about it? I impulse bought a 3060ti and a titanium rated psu and the gpu doesn't fit in my itx case lmao
This video is amazing. Just wish it had came out earlier ;) I bought a 6000MHz, C36 Latency, Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR% kit, for exactly $194. With tax it ended up being 200. I got it on offer, it was about 230 without the deal. Now the prices are down to 197 without tax, and I think that it's pretty good value. It's got good MHz, and a decent latency, plus the price is rather attractive. So would love to hear your thoughts on the descision. Thanks in advanced
I got a Dom Platinum 32GB 5600MHz C36 for 170 for black friday and for the money I had available to spend on my PC, I'm more than happy atm. You could never spend your money "wrong". Just know that since you have a DDR5 board and FAST DDR5 RAM, you'll probably be chillin for the next 5-6 years.
@@rparmar10_ no matter what hardware you have, you will start looking to upgrade by year 3. There is no "chilling" in tech, you're either equipped with the latest and greatest, or you're behind, which seriously doesn't even matter. The term "future proofing" is just a lie you tell yourself to justify your unnecessary over spending on expensive parts you don't actually need. That is spending your money very wrong. DDR5 has no real purpose for gamers, it mostly benefits productivity users (assuming you are a gamer since you're watching this video). That money saved could have gone to something that matters more now, like a better GPU, or just save the money. A bit of advice from a PC builder for 20 years, just buy what you need now, and look for a good deal. By the time you actually have a need to upgrade, all of the stuff you wanna buy now will still be there, their technology will be more matured, and for a much better price. Why are you spending extra money NOW for something you don't need and cannot take advantage of, just so you MIGHT be able to get by in the future? So many new tech are always around the corner, and you wanna LIMIT yourself NOW, away from all the options you can have later??? Rethink you're entire approach, seriously.
That's mighty expensive, even without considering the DDR5 motherboards are on average $100 more than the DDR4 ones. DDR5 currently is only for people with money that don't know what to do with them.
Smooth brains complain about cl not being mentioned like it matters... I'm over here like ram clock speed is measured in megatransfers not megahertz...
@@stuartmorgan3654 Microcenter gives free DDR5 with all AMD new cpus. I think prices of DDR5 going down makes the choice get whatever you want because it's gonna be the same price. I understand videos like this in areas without Microcenter but if you have one around just get the free DDR5..
People probably going to call me crazy for this, but for my build I'm thinking: RTX 4090 I5-13600k El Cheapo MSI PRO B660M-A CEC WIFI Motherboard 16 GB DDR4 3600 Mhz RAM in 2x8 To aim for 4K 120 FPS without bothering with overclocking
Here's my situation, I need a new AM4 or AM5 machine in the next 4 months, a pc that's to hopefully last me a good 4+ years. should I go AM5 and DDR5 anyway in case of future developments? or save myself £200 now and get a non-upgrade-able system.
am5 obviously. Dont invest in something that is gonna be outdated in a few years, i currently have an am4 and im not planning on upgrading until i see a double fps increase in my cpu and gpu and ram so
If you plan on upgrading it in 5+ years the next ram improvements would probably be around 2028 so I would recommend sticking with ddr4 and skipping ddr5 completely until the next biggest changes to the pc market. If you plan on upgrading at some point in the next 4-5 years than AM5 would be better.
I didn't chose DDR5 for better performance, but for upgradability. If there happens to be a game that benefits from it I don't have to worry and its only going to get better. I bet we will actually see a differences when we get lower than 28-34-34-89.
WOAH WOAH...as a 2080 ti series owner...I can attest that for WARZONE type games, if you are still at 2666 16 gb. Then going to 3200 32gb does add around 18-25 extra fps with the right setup in that situation. And also given you can sell the 2666 for 50 and get the 3200 for 75...then...for 25 bucks it is price to performance in the 20 series as well.
If your on a intel platform the 16gb patriot viper kits at 4400mhz are still a bargain. Can tweak them to run at 4000mhz cl16 even as a beginner after watching a couple videos. $160 Australian is pretty hard to argue with not to mention the savings from a cheaper motherboard.
I was worried when the video was sponsored by Acer, I bought an Acer brand new and within 3 months it obtained a crack on the screen. I contacted the company and was informed that they don't make my screen anymore, even though it was a 2021 Acer bought in 2021. But as far as the video, it was very informative, Thank you for the info. Everyone keeps telling me it's cheaper to have someone build your gaming PC computer than it is to buy one already store built. Because you don't know what the companies really installed as the hardware and who's drivers but I can't find anyone that would want to build a real gaming computer.
" Everyone keeps telling me it's cheaper to have someone build your gaming PC computer than it is to buy one " ~ Nobody said ever. It might end up more expensive than prebuild ones btw, this is because prebuild PCs always cut corners on components like RAM, motherboard, SSD, fans, case etc. They only mention the CPU and GPU used and everything else is corner cutting to the max. You have a computer and internet. Sit your ass down and start learning what each component does, what parameters matter and then look at comparisons etc. You'll be able to build your own PC in less than a month. I can help out, but only if you come with meaningful questions that show you already did actual research beforehand.
@@heikg I now have a custom-built gaming desktop computer. The fellas at N&G built it from the ground up. It's amazing how fast this is. Even during my time in the miitary we didn't have computers this fast. Definitely not going with a store bought Laptop for gaming. at just under $5k I'm going to have another one built for my video editing for my other channels. Cheers!
I think it's important to show the 1% and .01% fps figures when benchmarking. I'm sure that faster memory makes more of a difference in cases of frame dips at the 1% and 0.1% lows. I wouldn't expect it to make a huge difference in the average fps, but those low percent points are where faster memory would help out, reducing stutter.
Sometimes the lows and highs are down to the game aswell. You can have a 3k pc and still get frame drops and stutters. what are you going to do about it ? i gave up worrying about 1% bullshit
@@PcCentric crap. My mistake. I'm watching on a tiny screen, with low quality, so I must have missed these numbers from not squinting properly. Hope I didn't injure your feelings. I hate to be "that guy", because usually I try and use my brain while commenting. I also catsit while watching, and may have been looking away, while trying to prevent a "cat-astrophe" It's still my mistake, so I feel like a jerk. Sorry, brother, please accept my humble apologies. Now I'm gonna watch your video again while wearing thumbscrews for penitence. Happy holidays!
You are using 6000 cl36 as the best case scenario but we have ddr5 all the way up to 8000cl36 now. 7200 cl34 is a decent sweet spot. Plus the stick you were using were $200. You could have gotten 6800 cl34 for literally $20 more. Which is a significant improvement essentially for $20
Not only you'll have no issues, but if you had DDR4, then in some years' time that you'd want to upgrade to bring your PC again up to speed, you'd have to throw your motherboard out of the window and buy a new one that can support DDR5, while now, you'll just have to buy two new, faster sticks and you'll be good to go.
@Damion Manuel all AMD motherboards* Intel has motherboards that can run both DDR4 and DDR5, although at the time of this comment most companies are starting to move away from intel DDR4 support for their latest motherboards
Personally, I think if you buy ddr4 then you're wasting money. Just because ddr4 is phasing out now and ddr5 is just starting. I built a new pc in August and then built another one in October and gave the other one to my sister. The reason why I built 2 is the first one was my first pc build and the second is a new am5 platform. I honestly don't understand why someone would build a new pc on am4 platform now. People always make the argument that it's cheaper but technically you're throwing your money away just like I did. If you want to build cheaper go intel but even that is on it's last year. Hopefully with am5 I will be good for a few years
Why do we still compare 3600 mhz ddr4 to 6000+ mhz ddr5? Why not bump up the ddr4 to 4000+? It’s still cheaper and I think would be slightly more fair.
Fan fact: if you mixed ddr5 with ddr4 you get ddr9
Why not ddr20?
If you add a stick ddr3 to you get ddr12
Facts tho
🤯
DDR 4.5?
The ram timings were not talked about in this video, but they are very important. When the DDR5 was underclocked at 3600, the timings were probably still CL36 or something around that. DDR4 3600 is usually CL 14, 16 or 18. Much tighter. This explains why the FPS were worse on the DDR5 3600 . The timings should have been discussed or at least given so we could have a better idea how they affect the results.
also on ddr4 single or dual rank was not mentioned
Exactly same toughts here. I would like to see how tight timings you can get ddr5 with 3600mhz.
Agreed, for workload purposes the higher frequency can be an advantage but for gaming the Cas Latency is frequently overlooked. A CL36 with a 5600MHz DDR5 kit has a responce time of about 12.86 nanoseconds and a CL16 3600MHz DDR4 kit has roughly an 8.89 nanosecond responce time. Bigger numbers doesn't always mean better. For those who want to work out their RAM responce time it's CL multiplied by 2000 divided by the frequency to give an answer in nanoseconds.
Hi mate think u can help me with a pc build ?
apparantly this youtuber is not pro enough
Videos like this are SUPER helpful to those trying to navigate the "new and shiny" products and wondering if you are really getting a performance uplift compared to "older/previous generation" products that are cheaper! Thank you good sir
not exactly helpful.
as one commenter above already stated: The ram timings were not talked about in this video, but they are very important. When the DDR5 was underclocked at 3600, the timings were probably still CL36 or something around that. DDR4 3600 is usually CL 14, 16 or 18. Much tighter. This explains why the FPS were worse on the DDR5 3600 . The timings should have been discussed or at least given so we could have a better idea how they affect the results.
@@robertanthonybermudez5545 you are arguing for the sake of small percentages in performance, the vast majority of users simply won't be able to tell a difference.
@@colinhoover5153 if its not clear for you, I am pointing out the uncertainties in the TESTING METHOD. never I have mentioned any percentages significant or not.
@@robertanthonybermudez5545 did you tune into PC Centric and expect to see Steve or perhaps Tech Notice giving a full in depth breakdown of DDR5 vs DDR4? You may give beef for his "testing methods" but perhaps a change of expectation is needed here
@@colinhoover5153 of course! testing methods are standardized for the very reason of reliability. whoever youtuber uploads a content comparing performances, wether that be a small youtuber or big channels like LTT, i expect the same standard.
"it's all about value" after testing on a 4090 and ignoring the GPU cost in the £/frame calculations.
If someone spends £1800 on a GPU, they're spending £450+ on the MB and CPU, and £100+ on the RAM. If spending an extra £100 on RAM nets even a 5% FPS increase, compared to the 4% price increase, that's Better value for money.
ddr4 vs ddr5 there is still no difference.
Kinda shocking that DDR5 3600 is way slower than DDR4 3600
Not really, they didn't change the timings in this video, so that's why. Kinda amateurish tbh.
Those two front fans not spinning is driving me crazy.
If you only changed the memory speed on the DDR5 when testing the lower speeds, then the sloppier timings of DDR5 can massively hold it back, it really needs the higher speed to help counter it’s slower timings. I’ve found that tightening timings usually tends to yield a better performance gain than a faster speed when OC’ing RAM
Exactly!
Punctual reply here, I imagine it depends on what you're doing. Ddr4 can act on data faster, DDR5 can act on more data at once. If you're not moving large chunks in and out of memory constantly, ddr4 is equal to or better than DDR5.
If one kit can move up to 1GB of data and the process takes 1 seconds, and another moves up to 10GB but it takes 2 seconds for the process, then the second kit obviously moves more data. But if the largest transfer is only ever 1MB, the first kit is completing the task twice as fast.
Thats the difference between latency and clock speed. Clock is like your "time budget" , how many things it can do in one second, and latency is how much of that budget it costs to perform a given command.
People look at the max bandwidth alone and conclude DDR5 is just better by default, but if you're doing anything other than benchmarks, you're wasting money most of the time.
Games primarily use the VRAM for everything, if you run out of it and it hits the system ram, it doesn't matter how fast your ram or it's bandwidth, it's gonna be slower than aids. Ideally in that scenario you'd want as little data xfer as possible with the best access times possible.
I think, I might be making this all up, am I making it up? Nah...id never do that...come on what do you take me for? Come on, I'm not that kinda guy come on ..
@@brovid-19 I understand your point, but if you’re making direct comparisons between ram kits and only altering the speeds without a care about timings then you will lose performance and it can directly impact frame rates - this comment is from over a year ago though so I can’t remember exactly why I left it or what happened lmao
This was almost a perfectly executed test. I just wished that both kits were the same size and not 16g vs 32g. The video had the potential to be perfect but the idea that the ram kits aren't the same same size , I did appreciate that you tested the ddr5 at 3600mhz. I figure if or when ddr5 is more mainstream and 5200-6000 kits with better timings are a thing only then will there be an substantial increase over 3600 ddr4.
I actually find it refreshing how you make it clear you're not going to test at 1080P because of the GPU you're using, similar with the max settings in SOTTR. People focus too much on arbitrary numbers especially when it comes to things like DDR5 and then tend to give bad advice on the back of that. I like how your benchmarks are relative to what people are actually going to be running on a daily basis.
I agree, but I think it's more realistic that somebody would run either 1080p or 4k as a 4k monitors scales down to that. With 1440p you're kinda stuck there. So for real demanding games or games where refresh really matters you might super sample from 1080 with ultra everything and RT on (or is that just me?!)
Generally today's 1440p card is tomorrows 1080p ultra card and so on.
yeah,1080p is already past thing,1440p is new min resolution on 2023
80% of gamers still play on 1080p, what are you talking about?
I will wait until ddr5 becomes cheaper as it’s really not worth the money for performance currently. Great video as always.
I bought a new PC last week: an i5-13600KF with 32 GB of DDR4 3600 MHz memory and an ASUS Strix Z690-A Gaming WiFi D4 motherboard. I did consider DDR5 memory but the price plus more expensive motherboards pushed me towards DDR4 which I think was a good choice after watching numerous DDR4 vs DDR5 comparison videos on RUclips. I play games at 1440p with maxed out settings and RT, if available, on a RTX 3080 so I feel I have a well-balanced system for what it cost me. Yes, I could have future-proofed it by investing in DDR5 now but, honestly, by the time I next upgrade my PC, DDR6 or DDR7 will be around as my previous PC (i7-4770K with 16 GB DDR3 1600 memory) last me almost 10 years!
Did pretty much the same and more than happy as I reused my DDR4 3600 RAM so saved a fair bit on the motherboard CPU upgrade. Luckily I bought the Strix-D4 as well with the cashback offer from ASUS so even more savings...
Future proofing is a myth. Coming from a PC builder for 20+ years, just buy what you need now, and use that saved money on better parts. By the time you actually need to upgrade, there will be many more choices for a much better price. There is absolutely no reason to buy parts that you don't need and can't take advantage of now, just to bet that you will be ok with those said parts in the future. In a way, you are actually limiting yourself from the many options you can have in the future, and that's the only "future-proof" you'll get.
Same.
I went 13600k and DDR5 because I run servers while gaming, I can definately tell a huge difference from DDR4, but that's just me most people wouldnt notice anything at all. It does make me comfortable though spending that money on DDR5 because personally I think it's worth it, and while there's no thing such as future proofing, I am quite confident I will be able to use my ram sticks in a few years time without feeling held back because of my motherboard choice, like I did with my previous RAM sticks which had 2666MHz.. So a huge upgrade..
I also do work with my PC, so things such as Photoshop work so much more cleanly. But just for gaming obviously you should wait to buy DDR5 thats what I'd say.
@@DubboU i get what your saying but using a little more then you need on lets say a graphic card maybe mean that in 1 or 2 years will be very playable and enjoyable, instead of having to buy a new graphics card just because you went from CSGO which can be played on anything to a card that has to run elden ring or God of War. Personally i bought a 2080 in 2018 and used 100$ extra as opposed to a 2070, and im very happy with the decision even though i didnt really need the 2080 until cyberpunk came out. "future proofing" is most likely going from 1700 to 1900 or 2000 not going from a 700 build to a 3000 dollar build in my experience.
Long live DDR4 still the king in Gaming, performance, and price in building a killer Gaming PC, and I have 5 my self
you would be insane to put ddr4 in a new system now
It's a waste of money. That's why the system I just built has ddr4 3600 despite all the geniuses shit talking on PC pages
This is exactly why I haven't upgraded my RAM to DDR5 yet. No need. Marginal (at best) gains for more price. The only logical reason for buying DDR5 right now is if you are currently building a "future proof" rig that you plan on keeping for many years to come. Otherwise, if you are in my boat, where upgrading is the option, then it just isn't worth it. Not yet anyway. One day that extra speed will be worth it though.
I completely agree with your future proofing comment cause I'm in the situation where I need to future proof my incoming PC, as my older one is DDR3. I agree with you on specifically your 'one day' comment. Which is correct, at some point (like it happened with DDR2vsDDR3 and DDR3vsDDR4) the speeds and capabilities of DDR5 are going to exceed anything DDR4 can do. Probably a few gens from now. So, you're right, if you are in your position, hold back and then when you actually see it surpassing DDR4 speeds permanently, then you can go for it.
Depends on your current pc. For people like me who are still on ddr3, it makes sense to go straight to ddr5 than ddr4 seeing as this is the last generation of ddr4:)
@@xyr3s Yes, but that is kinda what I was getting at. Someone coming from DDR3 is basically building a whole new rig at this point. At least the core MOBO components, that is. So yes, I agree it depends on the specific PC. I am just saying that for me personally, it makes no sense at the moment. DDR5 isn't going to give me any substantial gains over what I have. One day it will though, so I am holding out. Those, like you, that are moving up generations and having to make a huge change with core components, you might as well go straight to DDR5 to future proof your system. So we are basically saying the same thing, just in different ways.
@@BarbarianAncestry Definitely. I am thinking that once 14th or even 15th gen Intel chips drop, I will then look at upgrading my system. At that point, DDR5 will be the standard, so it would make sense for me personally. Right now I am going to ride out my 11700k with DDR4 because it does the perfectly well. Probably will take this time to focus on upgrading to a 40 series GPU at some point (waiting to see if the 4070 will be a value buy or if I should wait until a 4080 gets more reasonably priced), even though my 3070 has served me well. Then when the time comes, I will be ready to make the jump to DDR5 with a new Mobo, CPU, SSD, etc. But everything is tentative. I am more in the mindset of upgrading when I need to, not when I want to. We will see though. I get the "itch" to buy parts at the most random times lol
@@lttlejordan23 :)
For something as essential as RAM, I'm amazed so few channels have covered this subject as well as this, for ordinary chaps deciding which way to swing. Also, your vid on the relative performance of DDR4 at different MHz speeds is essential viewing if going DDR4. Ta muchly.
I get there's a difference between 60fps and 144fps but when these cards are averaging into the 200's you just got to feel like there's no point worrying about the numbers by that point.
I just dropped a 5800X3D into my DDR4 rig as an upgrade instead of changing to AM5... the smart play right now.
What was the FPS uplift?
The 7000 x3d CPUs may knock it into a cocked hat (but likely at a price), and you have nowhere else to go on AM4.
@@Safetytrousers Yet.... AMD has said they are continuing to support the AM4 platform for a while longer so we may see more versions of x3D chips/refreshes and even zen 4 which they originally planned so we might get more improved CPUs for the platform at some point
@@exoticspeedefy7916 Chances are continued support means BIOS and chipset updates, and continuation of existing CPUs. AMD do want sales of AM5 and what better way to boost that than by only making new x3d chips for AM5.
same here 5800X3D happy with it
Would you consider testing these components for different applications, like Premier Pro, Lightroom, Photoshop etc? Those are supposedly very RAM dependent
Good question!
We are talking about gaming not for creators which is another animal in the room! GAMING
@@latlanticcityphil yes... We are talking about gaming in this video.. which is why I asked for a video concerning content creation... What's the point you're trying to make lmao
I can tell a huge difference especially multitasking in-between Adobe software, like photoshop and premiere pro. It works so much more seamlessly compared to my older DDR4 sticks and having a few extra tabs open on chrome wont hurt me then either :)
@@iggsterify this is a channel for PC gaming though. Nothing wrong with your question, just asking it in the wrong place.
This is as super helpful. Just grabbed the i7-13700 with a 4070 and was literally frozen trying to decide if the ddr4 mobo was the right decision.
Was literally thinking of building that setup to. What's your fps 1440p on warzone?
Relatable
I am glad i stuck with a 32gb dual channel ddr4 3600mhz kit. The money you save when compared to DDR5 is pretty much night and day.
Now watch a video from people who actually know what they are talking about. You probably won't be so glad. Especially if gaming.
@@B.D.E. ?? Well, as someone who already built a ddr5 system and a ddr4 system. At 1440p, at best, i saw 5% FPS difference. And you don't have to take my word for it. Look at HUB benchmarks, to Linus, to Gamernexsus, to Jay2cents. Pretty much all of them show there is barely any difference between the two at 1440p, and especially at 4k. Not sure where you're getting your source from? Looks like i am still sticking to being "glad".
"ill be here all day" comes to my mind after seeing your hair at 7:05 lol
It's really simple. DDR5 is in the exact same stage and DDR4 was and DDR3 etc etc. In the beginning it's a new, better product BUT the timings are nearly 3-4x higher. The best of the best DDR4 (out of the box w/o manual OC's) is 4000mhz CL14 compared to say G. Skill 6400mhz CL32 - that's the lowest/quickest DDR5 I've seen. I'm likely still going to wait. I have a Z690 DDR4 board with 64gb of 4000mhz CL14 and the price to performance just isn't there. The only situations where it would make sense would be if you are actually building a brand new computer or you're doing something that actually utilizes ram way more than gaming. Current DDR5 prices have dropped a fair bit so now is the time to def buy it but I'm still not blown away why the latencies. $180-190 for 6000mhz 36 / 38 latency. Meh. Then add on another $300-500 for a decent DDR5 mobo.
Lol dude first of all the reason your having worse performance with ddr5 at lower clock speeds is because ddr5 has much higher timings. Also why would you do 4K benchmarks with upscaling? Your basically just rendering at 1440p internally anyways so it’s not a real 4K benchmark.
Thanks for making all the videos you do, lots have helped me w building my desktop when I did and nowadays I watch bc you have good video ideas elite video quality and editing. Thanks! Great work!
This is interesting... I upgraded my processor from an i7 8700K to a i9 13900KS so I practically had to upgrade everything anyways. Got the ASUS ROG Maximus Hero z790 mobo so I'm forced to get DDR5 now. Kinda went stupid with my build and got the 128GB of Corsair Vengeance 5600 MHz RAM while running a RTX 3090 which I'm sure my GPU is going to bottleneck my new system for now. I still don't regret it though, as I'm sure my system is major future proof except the GPU.
The 4090 is so insanely powerful that only the very top end cpus can actually handle it without bottle necking it
What about games that actually use ram? Not just basic selection of mainstream games. But games that do a lot of generating, like: teardown, 7 days to die or minecraft.
Where it mattered (like not limited elsewhere), I think the DDR5 performance difference was unexpectedly huge! 6 or 7% increase in FPS is more than most overclocking of CPU or GPU will deliver despite costing 100s of additional watts. But that's just me.
if my budget of gpu is 4080, i would rather save everything a bit more for a 4090.
@@ke-channel9876and you will sacrifice 5 to 7% performance boost cause by ddr5?
Typical things people say to lie to themselves they did not get tricked into paying extra for nothing
@@netfreak6993 You really think DDR4 3600 will hold back the 4090 more than DDR5 will boos 4080? Your brain must be extra smooth.
@@heikghey captain, land it to me straight, got a desktop 2 months ago with ddr4 3600 and now thinking of getting ddr5 6000, tell me, will i be wasting money and neurons?
So basically you need to spend almost double the amount on a DDR5 setup to match ddr4 4000.
One money saving advantage of DDR5 is that you get DDR4 dual-channel performance on a single channel DDR5 installation. Hence, if you start with 16GB single channel DDR5, you can just add another stick of 16GB later to get 32GB, whereas with DDR4, having 2x 8GB sticks, you'd have to chuck them both out and buy 2x 16GB sticks, or run 4x 8GB sticks. As we know, DDR4 is quite restricted when running on a single channel and does need to run dual-channel. Also, if you upgrade the MB for the next-gen CPUs in 2024+, will they may only have DDR5 versions, so your DDR4 could not be re-used? So, going DDR5 now could be a more future-proof option.
By the time you're upgrading your motherboard next time there will be lot faster DDR5 RAM around. The current DDR5 kits will all look slow in comparison. So smart call is to go with DDR4 motherboard especially if you have decent DDR4 kit laying around right now.
Because the 6000MHz DDR5 ram you'll buy now will be compatible with the 9000MHz DDR5 you'll buy in a year? Get real dude and just accept you wasted your money.
It would be nice to have benchmarks for lower graphics settings which wouldn't actually bottleneck at GPU level and probably yield a performance increase on the faster memory. Max settings is good for showing off a new GPU, but out in the real world, a lot of gamers would sacrifice graphical fidelity for raw FPS gains.
Ddr5 is actually pretty clutch, I got a 16gb stick of it for like $70ish and it’s much better than my original 16gb ddr4 kit on my old mobo that was $120
Then again I have a 3090
The fact you did not mention the MHz or the CL tell me you bought the shittiest DDR5 on the market that is probably giving you worse FPS than a normal DDR4 ram stick.
Intel obviously knew this and thus offered the DDR4 option ,, Amd just kept cruising down the "Our shills can sell anything" system
DDR5 typically has much slower latency timings, despite DDR5 as being advertised as "faster" it usually has twice the operation lag.
Where DDR5 truly shines is when you're creating content, rendering, editing playback, etc, the extra speed (and most times, capacity) can massively help overcome system lag or desynchronizing
Great video Marcus 👌
I went out of my way to get a DDR4 computer rather than DDR5. I seem to recall a similar issue with DDR3 or maybe when DDR4 first came out. It was ages ago.
I play warzone almost exclusively with a 7950x and a 4090. According to my pc I’m using 33 of 64 gigs of my ddr5 ram at 6000 mhz. I get consistent 250-300 fps on very high 2k settings. My Alienware monitors only do 240hz of 2k though.
thanks for posting this im feeling a bit better now about going with my 32gb of 6000mhz ddr5, because after this video and reading alot of the comments i was a bit unsure
14:01 "I wouldn't spend hours and HOURS....." Exactly, that's why I spent days and DAYS! 🤣🤣🤣
CL timings at XMP would be relevant and usefull.
The courage not to leave your dance/rap scenes in the cutting room floor is admirable.
Your money is better spent on a crotchless gaming chair
Loved your energy and the testing. I'm not sure if it would make a difference, but I would like to see tests with intensive scenarios in the games such as dense firefights and extreme settings. Maybe there are significant differences there compared to tranquil walks around the map? Great video though. I was looking forward to upgrading to a DDR5 build... WAS.
for future , get ddr5 + b650 + ryzen 7600 and in 2027 you can use ryzen 10800x3d with your 2023 build
this what also i have in mind im building mine this January.
You should definitely do a mid maxer build where you only build PC parts that give the best bang for buck.
Yeah i would like to see a Budget Rtx 4080 gaming Pc that only go for No bottleneck of the GPU no flashy bells and whistle.
Today you need to run low settings even with 4090 1440p to constantly hit above 190fps in warzone 2. So high ram speed matters even more today.
Why only 16GB DDR4 and 32GB DDR5 across the board? If you think 16GB is still enough for high-end gaming, you're wrong. Hell, I have a game that can use over 48GB. That _is_ an edge case though (DCS), but many modern titles have me using 18-22GB or so in total, with only the game, Steam and MSI Afterburner running. And even after upgrading to 64GB RAM, Windows always finds something to use it for. It's all cache to Mr. Gates. You might say he likes swimming in cache.
Dud, you need to lay off the caffeine. I could only handle half of this video.....
For now I'm maintaining that a 3600MT/s CL16 kit of DDR4 will equal a £200 6000MT/s CL36 kit of DDR5 in MOST situations.
Best part -> I literally was searching about DDR4 vs DDR5 and just saw this guy's vid pop up
Thank you PC Centric
2x the price for 10% increase?
Waste of money
Definitely a scam. It should not have been released until higher speeds are available. There is no point buying at this time at today's prices.
its Not even %10 increase LOL its more like 3-4fps lmao
but im buying 7000 series?
AM4 is dead 💀. Eventually this guy will come around and accept it
Does anyone remeber the kid show gumby from the 80s or 90s? This is the guy right here.
Got the 7700x at Micro Center with a free kit of DDR5 32gb Ram @ 6000Mhrz :] only paid for the CPU, was a deal they were having there. hehehe
In this cost of living crisis who the heck is spending £1600 on a graphics card?
This is the one simple trick that ddr5 manufacturers don’t want you to know
Great video!
I agree i really thought ddr5 would have a more of a difference to be honest, however i'm actually really releived about it. I'm running a basic set up witha asus strix 1080ti 11gb 3600mhz ddr4 ram on a old asus strix 6th gen board with a i7 6700k cpu and was really considering a expensive leap to ddr5 ram motherboard cpu & gpu upgrade until I watched this. ddr4 seems to be the way to go which is a lot easier on the wallet to say the least lol. Awesome content by the way man appreciate the solid intel on what gamers should or shouldn't buy this content saved my wallet big time!
This was a very useful video. It clearly shows at 4k ram speeds do not make a difference. But at lower resolutions ram speeds make more of a difference. It would be good to see the results for a lower end system in 1080p and 1440p. Ie 13600k with a 3080 and 6600xt
i wouldve loved to see that. ive been going down this rabbit hole on whether to get ddr4 or ddr5 ram. i just bought a 13600k and a 3080 yesterday.
@@rinse3x what did you go with and how do you feel about it? I impulse bought a 3060ti and a titanium rated psu and the gpu doesn't fit in my itx case lmao
@@baloneyslice247 3080 and ddr5. Works great. Love it
What about 1% lows? would be interesting to see if there is a big difference. This affects games more than raw average FPS IMO.
Those are in the benchmarks, ddr5 is pointless for that too.
Great presentation, got me subbed!!
Thanks for doing this! No one is doing these tests in 2023 now that the platform has matured a bit. Great to have updated info. Saved me some money!
Laughing at the exclamation of 10% improvement;
Came a long way from the super market bro 💯💪🏼 keep up the great work !!
2:30
that motherboard model line is one of my favorite motherboard lines.
Short version ; if you are going to build new pc or upgrade DDR5 is obvious choice and future proof, if not DDR4 is fine for gaming.
The New Definition of "BASIC" JUST HITTED GUYS.
This video is amazing. Just wish it had came out earlier ;) I bought a 6000MHz, C36 Latency, Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR% kit, for exactly $194. With tax it ended up being 200. I got it on offer, it was about 230 without the deal. Now the prices are down to 197 without tax, and I think that it's pretty good value. It's got good MHz, and a decent latency, plus the price is rather attractive. So would love to hear your thoughts on the descision. Thanks in advanced
I got a Dom Platinum 32GB 5600MHz C36 for 170 for black friday and for the money I had available to spend on my PC, I'm more than happy atm. You could never spend your money "wrong". Just know that since you have a DDR5 board and FAST DDR5 RAM, you'll probably be chillin for the next 5-6 years.
@@rparmar10_ no matter what hardware you have, you will start looking to upgrade by year 3. There is no "chilling" in tech, you're either equipped with the latest and greatest, or you're behind, which seriously doesn't even matter. The term "future proofing" is just a lie you tell yourself to justify your unnecessary over spending on expensive parts you don't actually need. That is spending your money very wrong. DDR5 has no real purpose for gamers, it mostly benefits productivity users (assuming you are a gamer since you're watching this video). That money saved could have gone to something that matters more now, like a better GPU, or just save the money. A bit of advice from a PC builder for 20 years, just buy what you need now, and look for a good deal. By the time you actually have a need to upgrade, all of the stuff you wanna buy now will still be there, their technology will be more matured, and for a much better price. Why are you spending extra money NOW for something you don't need and cannot take advantage of, just so you MIGHT be able to get by in the future? So many new tech are always around the corner, and you wanna LIMIT yourself NOW, away from all the options you can have later??? Rethink you're entire approach, seriously.
@@rparmar10_exactly.
That's mighty expensive, even without considering the DDR5 motherboards are on average $100 more than the DDR4 ones.
DDR5 currently is only for people with money that don't know what to do with them.
@@rparmar10_ that was the idea behind the decision to get DDR5
Smooth brains complain about cl not being mentioned like it matters... I'm over here like ram clock speed is measured in megatransfers not megahertz...
10:24 I heard this and remembered seeing people actually setting their DDR5 to 3600 so they can have 128gb of ram function in AM5
DDR5/4 = DDR1.25
in My opinion you pay more money for ddr5 for nothing
Love how you act like that PAD took you a year when it is a complete ripoff of some not-so-popular Vector graphic video games....a shame
I got DDR5 6000 for free with my cpu at Microcenter. I did the math and DDR5/MB/CPU was cheaper than intel/ddr4/MB
cool. I think it goes without saying there are outlier cases where a deal makes DDR5 the better option. Glad you were able to do that.
@@stuartmorgan3654 Microcenter gives free DDR5 with all AMD new cpus. I think prices of DDR5 going down makes the choice get whatever you want because it's gonna be the same price. I understand videos like this in areas without Microcenter but if you have one around just get the free DDR5..
Ahhhhhh it's good to get a xmas gift from somebody and it is a 32gb ddr5, but not worth buying it from your own pocket
Am i the only one who thought that "underclocking" ddr5 rams with bigger clatency than ddr4 would make no sense?
I saw that same ram 32gb ddr5 for 100 bucks and that was the easiest future proof for my new build, why not tbh.
People probably going to call me crazy for this, but for my build I'm thinking:
RTX 4090
I5-13600k
El Cheapo MSI PRO B660M-A CEC WIFI Motherboard
16 GB DDR4 3600 Mhz RAM in 2x8
To aim for 4K 120 FPS without bothering with overclocking
Here's my situation, I need a new AM4 or AM5 machine in the next 4 months, a pc that's to hopefully last me a good 4+ years. should I go AM5 and DDR5 anyway in case of future developments? or save myself £200 now and get a non-upgrade-able system.
am5 obviously. Dont invest in something that is gonna be outdated in a few years, i currently have an am4 and im not planning on upgrading until i see a double fps increase in my cpu and gpu and ram so
If you plan on upgrading it in 5+ years the next ram improvements would probably be around 2028 so I would recommend sticking with ddr4 and skipping ddr5 completely until the next biggest changes to the pc market. If you plan on upgrading at some point in the next 4-5 years than AM5 would be better.
I didn't chose DDR5 for better performance, but for upgradability. If there happens to be a game that benefits from it I don't have to worry and its only going to get better. I bet we will actually see a differences when we get lower than 28-34-34-89.
Thank you. This helped me make my purchase. Ddr4 3600. Z690 motherboard
I mean unless you use that AM5 motherboard with AMD 7000 cpu's. Then you pretty much have to use DDR5.
WOAH WOAH...as a 2080 ti series owner...I can attest that for WARZONE type games, if you are still at 2666 16 gb. Then going to 3200 32gb does add around 18-25 extra fps with the right setup in that situation. And also given you can sell the 2666 for 50 and get the 3200 for 75...then...for 25 bucks it is price to performance in the 20 series as well.
If your on a intel platform the 16gb patriot viper kits at 4400mhz are still a bargain. Can tweak them to run at 4000mhz cl16 even as a beginner after watching a couple videos. $160 Australian is pretty hard to argue with not to mention the savings from a cheaper motherboard.
So u tweak them to run slower ?
@@shockwav3xx running them in gear 1 at 4400mhz is difficult, drop clocks slightly but tighten timings and keep it in gear 1.
@Dav3_dino reducing the clock speed by 400mhz to gain better timings and remaining in gear 1 is literally a non issue just pure performance increase.
I was worried when the video was sponsored by Acer, I bought an Acer brand new and within 3 months it obtained a crack on the screen. I contacted the company and was informed that they don't make my screen anymore, even though it was a 2021 Acer bought in 2021. But as far as the video, it was very informative, Thank you for the info. Everyone keeps telling me it's cheaper to have someone build your gaming PC computer than it is to buy one already store built. Because you don't know what the companies really installed as the hardware and who's drivers but I can't find anyone that would want to build a real gaming computer.
" Everyone keeps telling me it's cheaper to have someone build your gaming PC computer than it is to buy one " ~ Nobody said ever.
It might end up more expensive than prebuild ones btw, this is because prebuild PCs always cut corners on components like RAM, motherboard, SSD, fans, case etc. They only mention the CPU and GPU used and everything else is corner cutting to the max.
You have a computer and internet. Sit your ass down and start learning what each component does, what parameters matter and then look at comparisons etc. You'll be able to build your own PC in less than a month. I can help out, but only if you come with meaningful questions that show you already did actual research beforehand.
@@heikg I now have a custom-built gaming desktop computer. The fellas at N&G built it from the ground up. It's amazing how fast this is. Even during my time in the miitary we didn't have computers this fast. Definitely not going with a store bought Laptop for gaming. at just under $5k I'm going to have another one built for my video editing for my other channels. Cheers!
I think it's important to show the 1% and .01% fps figures when benchmarking. I'm sure that faster memory makes more of a difference in cases of frame dips at the 1% and 0.1% lows. I wouldn't expect it to make a huge difference in the average fps, but those low percent points are where faster memory would help out, reducing stutter.
We showed them in the benchmark graphs :)
Sometimes the lows and highs are down to the game aswell. You can have a 3k pc and still get frame drops and stutters. what are you going to do about it ? i gave up worrying about 1% bullshit
@@Ladioz you enable the V-sync ....
@@nykraftlemagnifique Im not talking about screen tearing, im talking about physical stutter, a jitter, a hiccup. you feel it as you play
@@PcCentric crap. My mistake. I'm watching on a tiny screen, with low quality, so I must have missed these numbers from not squinting properly.
Hope I didn't injure your feelings. I hate to be "that guy", because usually I try and use my brain while commenting.
I also catsit while watching, and may have been looking away, while trying to prevent a "cat-astrophe"
It's still my mistake, so I feel like a jerk.
Sorry, brother, please accept my humble apologies. Now I'm gonna watch your video again while wearing thumbscrews for penitence. Happy holidays!
DDR4 CL14 FTW
Basic 4090?
We have different meanings to " basic "
You are using 6000 cl36 as the best case scenario but we have ddr5 all the way up to 8000cl36 now. 7200 cl34 is a decent sweet spot. Plus the stick you were using were $200. You could have gotten 6800 cl34 for literally $20 more. Which is a significant improvement essentially for $20
Those cpu and boards that can run 8000 are few as far between.
@@killerrf yes but you still get way better timings even if you can’t reach xmp.
I been using 2x32gb (64gb) DDR5 5600MHz kit & it’s been great for me. No issues what so ever
Not only you'll have no issues, but if you had DDR4, then in some years' time that you'd want to upgrade to bring your PC again up to speed, you'd have to throw your motherboard out of the window and buy a new one that can support DDR5, while now, you'll just have to buy two new, faster sticks and you'll be good to go.
@@BarbarianAncestry probably why the zen 4 ryzen ddr5 6000mhz deal at micro center seem really good right now.
@ncashofficia-dailycryptone8982 messaged you!
Great video as usual keep it up my guy!
Question: Did you use a seperate 6600MHz kit for the 6600MHz test or did you enable XMP on the 6000MHz to get that up to 6600MHz?
this actually helps because the motherboard im thinking about upgrading to only takes ddr5 for some reason so i’m trying to weigh my options
@Damion Manuel all AMD motherboards* Intel has motherboards that can run both DDR4 and DDR5, although at the time of this comment most companies are starting to move away from intel DDR4 support for their latest motherboards
The slowed down DDR5 performed badly because the CAS latency is so much higher than on DDR4, right?
Personally, I think if you buy ddr4 then you're wasting money. Just because ddr4 is phasing out now and ddr5 is just starting. I built a new pc in August and then built another one in October and gave the other one to my sister. The reason why I built 2 is the first one was my first pc build and the second is a new am5 platform. I honestly don't understand why someone would build a new pc on am4 platform now. People always make the argument that it's cheaper but technically you're throwing your money away just like I did. If you want to build cheaper go intel but even that is on it's last year. Hopefully with am5 I will be good for a few years
The way he handles the components 😂😭
What CPU’s won’t make you bottlenecked. Are gpu’s so far ahead of cpus?
Why do we still compare 3600 mhz ddr4 to 6000+ mhz ddr5? Why not bump up the ddr4 to 4000+? It’s still cheaper and I think would be slightly more fair.
Bottom line is if u are on ddr4, no need to go ddr5 yet. If u are on ddr 3 like me, then get ddr5 :p