It's not sushruta it was CARAKA(Medicine Doctor)in kaniska's time. Sushruta was the Father of plastic surgery in indian history Bishamitra's son Maharishi sushruta was born in Varanasi
When you invite a 20 year old boy as a historian in your podcast reflects your intellect level as a host of a pakistani podcast. Pakistan for you👇:- 1. Converted Muslims from Hindus(Sanatani) by force. 2. Radicalised by a book. 3. Divided a piece of land from India over Islamic radical thoughts.
@yashpednekar331 Yes he needs to study from Abhijit Chavda and Sanjay Dixit, bottomline from Amu Darya to Bay of Bengal is one people, one culture, one lingua franca and one civilization! Gangadesh mata ki jai!!!!
The best part of this podcast is every time the guy states a fact, he adds “I might be mistaken”. This one sentence shows the difference between a learned and an ignorant man.
Non Muslim Indians feel more attached to historical sites like Taxila and ancient culture . One example of this is that they still name their kids in the same language as their ancestors and identify more with them.
In India we still teach at school that “Taxilla, Nalanda ka itihaas laut ke aayega” which means Indian universities shall once day reach the glory of universities like Taxilla and Nalanda where all students from Asia will come to learn.
You are gangudeshi. India doesn't exist eastern side of Indooz aka Indus Valley. There's a difference between British created India and the India of Sindh which is connected to Kashmir, Balochistan, Western Punjab and Gandhara civilization of Afghanistan. Basically current Pakistan.
@@MustafaAli-lb8dq Hinduism has no one fixed book, teacher, prophet or set of instructions. It is not unified and has a lot of diversity. It is not like the cult which calls others “Kaafir” and invades them.
As an Indian I think my ancestors have been in this land for thousands of years . They may have different religion but I am Muslim now . But that’s still don’t disconnect me from my land . Unless Pakistani who starts their story from 1947 .
Yes, according to the standards of education in history prevalent in India. You probably didn't even listen to this podcast at all but if you start listening from 8:05, the answer to your POV is already there.
"Unless Pakistani who starts their story from 1947 ." We start our story from when our ancestors began, which is thousands of years old, we aren't disconnected either and good, keep connecting to your own country.
Well! Cowards who submitted to Islam got converted. For so long, they tried to become arabs and now when they are kicked from everywhere, they try to become who they ceased to exist long ago. Coward converts have no claim to history.
1:16:29 university of taxila could not be establish during Achaemenid dynasty because panini's time is during 600 bc and panini himself wrote that before him there was also a long tradition of teachers at taxila, even many kings during mahajanapada time were students of taxila 1:20:03
Wow I’m amazed the things he’s talking about are taught in Indian schools at such young age My son is in class 6 and he’s learning about Taxila…n spread of Buddhism and Jainism in India…along with tht all about the great Indian rulers…The Mauryas…The Guptas…The Cholas… No wonder Indians sense of identity and cultural pride is so deep rooted…Huge respect fr all the Indian educationists and Indian Historians.
He clearly mentioned that this stuff is not taught to kids in Pakistan. Try taking into context of why he’s saying what he’s saying instead of boasting about the teaching of history in ur country
@@umerghaffar4686 He also clearly said that Maurya and Taxila are heritage of Pakistan and India doesn't exist on the eastern side of Indus valley i.e current India. The cholas hated Indus valley and its kings cuz these kingdoms have always invaded and plundered ganga jamuna. Mauryans alone killed millions of ganga jamuna
It is a matter of Pride… a Heritage we Indians have always been proud of something you guys have woken up after 76yrs and suddenly realized is a shared heritage…Obviously we are going to boast about it good, bad or ugly…we have owned up to our history.
Story of Ghazni was "created" by British.. How conveniently he says kings of same religion also used to loot each other's wealth.. And why was Mahmud ghaznavi called Butshikan then.. what does that word mean?
a pakistani muslim always know how to twist facts which goes against his/her faith. you can easy identify these traits with pakistani community anywhere in the world. These shameful people identify themsleves as Indians in europe. their current socio-economical state tells the truth which almost all Pakistanis try to hide.
You may not like to use the word Indian subcontinent because you think it’s political word , but the term is geographical representation of tectonic plate which is called India so you may like it or not you cannot remove India from Pakistan if you talk about history, the problem here is Pakistan never considered non-muslims born in Pakistan region as there heroes , and for India anyone born in this region was Indian
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 the Pakistani river originates from India, the word Sindhu is Sanskrit name, the Greeks would call Indica based from Sindhu, Arabs will call Hindustan again based on Sindhu. The Pakistani identity is merely on paper, Pakistan people itself are called Hindus by Arabs. I have been restaurant overseas and found large numbers of Indian restaurants owned by Pakistani / Bangladeshi that itself speaks identity
@@embeddedprojects2336 I'm gonna stop you right there because the Indus starts in china.And,the Nile starts in Ethiopia but,everyone counts it as an Egyptian river because it has the most of the Nile,so your arguments are invalid.And the Pakistani identity is that of the Indus valley,not Arab or turk.
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 Pakistan identity should be Indus valley but what percentage of Pakistani believe that ? Also Indus valley was discovered in early 19th century before that there is no such direct historical records of trade or anything, only Vedas have some mentioned of that region along with a river Saraswati whose flow over time reduced. Much of Arab, Greek, Persian and East Asian trade history is again with modern day India. Most of the present region of Pakistan was always under foreign rule starting from Darius in 500BC.
@@embeddedprojects2336 as husaifa said,only the British discovered the Indus valley in 19th century,but the locals knew of it's existence because if the existence of monuments and cities.And only a small amount of the population claims to be foreign.Most people either take pride in their local identity,or they simply point out that their ancestors were foreign,while they themselves have adopted local cultures.
00:03 Oldest proof of cotton cultivation in Indus Valley 04:27 Exploring history, mythology, and cultures through literature and social media. 11:23 Pakistan's history spans over 5,000 years of cultural evolution. 15:10 Pakistanis are deeply connected to their shared history. 21:57 Peshawar became a prominent city connecting traders and civilizations. 24:47 Gandhara region's important history and ancient trading routes 30:47 Onions connected with 18th-century South Asia trading routes. 34:30 Fables and stories from South Asia traveled to the Arab lands 43:15 Discovery of the ancient Greek temple in Pakistan and its destruction by the British 46:28 Pakistan's history includes Hinduism and Buddhism as major religions 54:08 Translations of knowledge can be problematic. 57:36 Understanding the historical narrative of Pakistan's formation 1:03:54 Coffee's origin and impact on Muslim society 1:06:48 The significance of Star of David in Pakistani history 1:12:37 Persian Empire's expansion into Pakistan 1:15:25 AR Empire's use of ancient script in Pakistan 1:23:27 The roots of the Kalash people and their historical connections 1:25:57 Discussion on the history and cultural evolution of the people in Northern chatral 1:32:28 Pakistan has a rich history in cotton cultivation and dentistry 1:36:53 Pakistan's resistance against Alexander the Great and the influence of colonial languages on the region's identity 1:44:39 Pakistanis struggle with identity crisis due to historical and ideological factors 1:48:09 Debate over Pakistani culture and influences. 1:56:35 Transformations in Karachi's history and culture 2:00:18 Pakistan's youth holds strong ideology and understanding of politics. 2:07:13 Gandhi's decolonization efforts and health struggles. 2:09:53 The complexity of the 1947 partition 2:16:04 British scholars played a significant role in documenting South Asian history and folklore. 2:18:42 British conquest of the region due to propaganda and strategic reasons. 2:24:58 Climate change led to migration and genetic mix in South Asia 2:28:16 Indian ancient structures and history 2:36:26 Ancient history of Pakistan and the translation of Quran into a local language. 2:39:59 Pakistan's rich history, folklore, and culture 2:48:25 Discussion on mythical creatures and their historical origins 2:52:02 Discussion on Pakistan's folklore, trophy hunting, and cultural practices.
Pakistan was an artificial creation of the twentieth century. It neither has, nor ever will have anything to do with the history of India(subcontinent). Pakistani “history” begins from 1947. Before that it’s Indian history, as even Pakistan was a part of India. Entire Indus valley civilisation is about Shiva, Sarees bangles which are completely Indian takhashila, nalanda is a Hindu university taught By Chanakya Literally read about Indus valley civilisation in ancient India it’s nt just Indian/ Pakistani history it’s Hindu History…the subjects thy were teaching were Vedic Studies and Hindu Astrology…Chanakya was one of the teachers there…it was ruled by our great rulers Chandragupta Maurya and his successor Ashoka the great…Pls do a deeper research about Takshashila first. How was Pakistan created ? by RELIGIOUS idealogy you wanted to be MUSLIMS thats how you got Pakistan even the name Pakistan is not yours, Its persian for you to be descendants of Indus valley civlisation you have to be Indiainised, not persian/arabic Chanakya a Hindu, whose motive was Hindu rajya taught in Takhashila which is in modern day Pakistan. Nalanda the worlds oldest university in now in modern india, which Chanakya ALSO taught and visited. Buddhas statues were destroyed in Afghanistan by Taliban in 2001. Thats how widespread the Indian dharmic culture was. You know who destroyed them both? Muslim invaders. now choose, are you PAKISTANI a MUSLIM INVADER or are you INDUS VALLEY DESCENDANT which is a HINDU VICTIM?
The fable he is talking about is Panchatantra written by Vishnu Sharma. The book by shuruta is called shusruta samhita.. detailed anatomy of human body and plastic surgery. Takshshila (Taxila now) and Nalanda were the top educational institutions of the sub continent.. it is said that when the books in Nalanda were burned, the fire kept on going for weeks... More than 10 millions books were burned. To learn more about the golden age of Islam ( which Westerners term as dark ages cuz according to them nothing happened in the entire world before renessaince) kindly refer to lectures by Dr Roy casagranda.
@@Thestrong11 abe gadhe international authors k history books hi padh le.....purushpura naam tha.....tere se pakistani education system ne sb chupaya h...thora jahaalat se baahr nikal...duniya bahot bari h
@@Thestrong11Hindu kings had better things to do then make tombs for dead people 😂😂😂😂. BTW truth will be pit soon. Babri Masjid was built on temple. Islamic kings were too arrogant to remove all the proofs of existing temples. what a bunch of fools. Thank God all the fools migrayed to Foolishtan
"Islam is in its origins an Arab religion. Everyone not an Arab who is a Muslim is a convert. Islam is not simply a matter of conscience or private belief. It makes imperial demands. A convert's worldview alters. His holy places are in Arab lands; his sacred language is Arabic. His idea of history alters. He rejects his own; he becomes, whether he likes it or not, a part of the Arab story. The convert has to turn away from everything that is his." ---- V S Naipaul
This comment has to be one of the top contenders for the biggest piece of bullshit that is part of this vast and mostly ludicrous comment section. Whoever Naipaul is, that man is smoking on some filthy stuff, I’ll tell you that.
Har convert ko lgta hai ki vo original hai. Ye case me toh jo role model se related books h usme bhi idols ko destroy krne ki baat hai. Yaha toh originals bhi converted hi hai
@@Fgghhnh2345 Right, Now what would a butthurt anti-Islamic ultracrepidarian such as the likes of YOU, know or feel about the sheer beauty and blessing of being a Muslim. These petty comments don’t faze us the lease bit, lad, never will. So whatever helps you sleep at night lmao.
indus velly civilization is indian history then pakistan created from india , if you think indus velly civilization is only pakistan history is wrong becasue there is lots indus velly civilization center is in india . so only selected history is not workable remember chankhya studied in taxsila but he make chandragupta king and its capital was patliputra in modern bihar .
But Pashtun Baloch do not belong to Indus Valley Civilization pashto Balochi language both are Persians Farsi language har Pakistani Punjabi sindhi Nahi hota dono civilasation Ka mixture ha Pakistan 🇵🇰
jizya was 1.5 percent of yearly wealth.The zakat,the tax for muslims is 2 persent.Meaning being a muslim was more expensive so your logic seems incomplete.
@@12SPASTIC12 Salman Rashid couldn't differentiate between Balochistan and Sindh.Calling Balochistan the Indian satrapy when the very name of India comes from Sindh.
The fable he is talking about is Panchatantra written by Vishnu Sharma. The book by shuruta is called shusruta samhita.. detailed anatomy of human body and plastic surgery. Takshshila (Taxila now) and Nalanda were the top educational institutions of the sub continent.. it is said that when the books in Nalanda were burned, the fire kept on going for weeks... More than 10 millions books were burned. To learn more about the golden age of Islam ( which Westerners term as dark ages cuz according to them nothing happened in the entire world before renessaince) kindly refer to lectures by Dr Roy casagranda.
@@0bajwa0Nalanda University was built by Kumaragupta of the Gupta dynasty in the 5th century BC. Prominent rulers of the time, including King Harshavardhana of Kannauj, Pala Rulers, and many scholars patronized Nalanda.
The time period this gentleman is talking / referring is when Pakistan was not existing, the area was not invaded by islamists, the world used to come to India through different routes. Indus was one of them. Mohenjodaro was part of the civilisation which was spread across today's Pakistan, East India.
You are very true, however the majority of the Indus civilization is where is today's Pakistan, mostly Punjab and Sindh, offcourse everything around were also influenced.
There was no india too. Indian subcontinent is never united. Its the mix of different cultures and religions. India didnt exist before 1947. The word india is itself derived from indus which originates from Tibet and flows into modern day pakistan.
@@hamadkhan4702 We Gandoodeshis will never accept any identity/name imposed on us by the foreigners - be it Bharat, India or Hindoostan. We are the proud aborigines living in the Gangoodesh for trillions of years and this is our only true identity.
@@hamadkhan4702 ya I know current India did not exist before 1947 because Pakistan as a part separated from it. but how can you say India did not existed before 1947 just to satisty the formation of Pakistan which was just a line write down by a British on Indian map. At the same time you are saying India is derrived from the word Indus and every Indian knows it very well but the question is who derived it ? is it Nehru ?? JInha ? in 1947. and the guest is also just denying the fact you were also called Indian before 1947. and the identity crisis is real in Pakistan that's for sure what kind things you can present the world that is not a very Indian thing. that only Pakistan have??. Urdu language is originated in India, all your food covered under Indian food except few. you looks exactly same as a normal Indian looks except may be your religion could be diffrent that's personal, if the religion makes you diffrent from India than what about Indian muslims? you are exactly same as Indian muslims. I know India was not united before 1947 it was princely states but scripture whether its from Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism called the land from Himalaya to Indian Ocean Bharat or Bharatwarsha, I am not forcing you to admit that hinduism are the oldest religion in this region I know you are not gonna do that. as you are saying the word India comes from Indus and you forget the word hindu also derive from Indus itself. the people who comes from west used to called the people hindus who lives alongsie with sindu river. they gave the name hindu to the indigenous people from this region. that is very stupid argument saying only the people lives alongside with sindu river are descendent of Indus Valley civilisation. don't you think people migrated from Indus to different part of India after the civilisation ended? . You are just justifying yourself and the creation of Pakistan by saying India also did not exist before 1947. how come a company comes from Britain in 1600 and registered itself as East India Company. why did they chose the word India why they did not select the name like Goa, Kolkata, Madras when they arrive in this region. I think they were dreaming at that time in future in 1947 a country called India will come into existence so we should choose the name India. India does not exist as a country at that time nor USA, or any other country in the world because there were no country system at that time but as a region it is always called India or Indian subcontinent. if you don't believe me on India you can check Indian ancient scripture where it is called Bharatwarsh, aryavrat, Arab called this land as Hindustan, and The Greek geographer Herodotus (5th century BC) also described India, calling it hē Hindikē chōrē, which means "the Indus land". The Greeks called India "Indus", while the Iranians called it "Hindu".
He's quite an amateur - can you bring professional historians instead. He believes Patna or even Chandigarh has nothing to do with Gandhara for example. It's amusing. His opinions are coming not out of any academic insights but purely an emotional reaction to not getting global respect as a Pakistani. He needs to introspect because this won't take him too far. He's making the same mistake as previous Pakistan Studies - looking at history through an ideological agenda.
He gave the perfect counter reaction to how Indians claim history from our part of the land as theirs. Nothing wrong with that aspect. He is talking strictly from Pakistan's point of view and our OWN history from our part of the subcontinent. If you don't want to agree on that, that is a separate issue. Watch Ranveer Allahbadia's podcast if you want to hear what you already believe.
@@haziqajmxl nothing wrong with talking about history from a Sindhi, Panjabi or Balochi point of view. But to project modern borders to history and to say for example that Chandigarh region has no link with Gandhara region, etc. because the Radcliffe line passes inbetween is laughable.
@@noirdezzir8424 That is what he is saying. What happened in Chandigarh during Gandhara period is Chandigarh's or India's history. But what happened in our part of the that civilization is that region's or Pakistan's history.
Thoroughly enjoyed the podcast as I am a big admirer of Huzaifa! Also as a Chitrali, I felt extremely satisfied when you discussed our problems. Allah tate khair korar!
I feel very ashamed that we have been mistreating our Chitrali community. In Punjab the only concept we are given of Chitral is that it's a very backwards area and you can buy their beautiful women for marriage. The fact that we as the people of Punjab get the most development just because we are the majority and politicians live here and Chitrali people don't, goes to show we are an ungrateful nation and we will never succeed in the world.
It is unfortunate that there are negative perspectives about different ethnicities in our country. Similarly, we have been taught many misconceptions about Punjabi people, which may be incorrect, just like your perspective on Chitral. Chitral is one of the most beautiful places in Pakistan, with its lush greenery, welcoming people, and warm hospitality that is difficult to describe in words. People from Punjab, Sindh, and other parts of KPK take advantage of this hospitality. In Chitral, there are Muslims, Kalash, and Ismaili communities, and despite religious differences, we coexist happily. The Kalash have a wedding ritual where, after serving meals, the boy takes away the girl (bhaga k le jana). But it happens ""within"" their community. This doesn't imply that anyone else can come and say, "I want to bring you to my home," not even a Chitrali if he is not from the kalash community. The literacy rate in chitral is very high as compared to any other district of kpk. This huzaifa nizam is a prime example that our soil has the ability to produce many talents, intellectuals and heroes.
He has a preference for referring to our region as "South Asia" instead of the "Indian subcontinent," despite acknowledging that the term "India" has its roots in Sindh.
That's pakistani mentality for you. For the past few years most of these overseas Pakistanis are slowly trying to seal Indian history and claim its their. That's because in the world today pakistan is called terrorist country. That's causing embarrassment to these overseas pakistanis
This podcast is a classic example of how hatred towards a certain religion and region makes one not acknowledge ones history and culture. Despite being asked several times, the gentleman keeps lamenting that Indians should not claim Indus valley civilisation as a part of their history. The dichotomy of the sad fact that it's a shared history, but Pakistanis do not want to associate with it and Indians do.
The problem is not hatred, it is the definition of word India. What does India means to you? How do you define it?Which definition are you referring to?
@@TruthPrevailzyour mentality is the typical Indian mentality like what he said. In pakistan punjabis says we we are punjabi phuktoon says we are phuktoon and we together becomes Pakistani. And on other hand Indians says we are Indians the name which was given by Britishers. We are not Indians. We are real sons of indus valley we live in south asia and stop stealing our identity
Crazy how he seems to have read all books by Muslim and foreign authors about Indian subcontinent except the very books that are one of the oldest known works of literature from the subcontinent. He might have actually learnt something new other than merely trying to understand his own land through the eyes of people foreign to it themselves. 🤦♂️🤷♂️
Indians are always polluting comment sections of Pakistani history videos. It proves what Huzaifa said about Indians claiming rights to all the history of subcontinent because it suits them. Amazing podcast though. Keep it up.
You should go to the land of Muhammad. The whole of India is ours. Your presence/islam’s presence is temporary. It’s only a mere 1400 years, whereas we have lived in this land forever. Your great great great great grandfather was a Hindu and a coward, he converted because he was a coward. So Ramesh, don’t be too angry about it. You are one of us, just from a weak bloodline.
This guest has a funny logic around 55:20 saying "If you are waking up at the middle of the night, doing wazu in cold water to do namaz, you can't be forcefully converted to do it"😂😂😂 The thing is, you just need to convert a family forcefully once. The later generations will get accustomed to the new religion with time as it is the only way they will be exposed to. This doesn't mean their forefathers were not forcefully converted. Also, read about how jizya was collected from non-Muslims during Mughal era. The jizya collector would literally spit in the mouth of non-Muslims. Humiliation like these also forced people to accept Islam.
If the kings were onto full fledged conversion,there would be no hindu left,the thing is there is difference between todays hindu and medieval hindus. Descrimation by caste, untouchability,inequality was prominent and islam came as a light to indians where all are equals.The king and the beggar pray sidebyside,whereas many lower caste not even allowed to enter temple.
@@shoaibbeg9702 Why do you assume that the were no Hindu, Sikh and other religious Kings who were opposing Islamic invaders? It was because of them why many non-Muslims remained non-Muslims and continued practicing their religion. Read about Maratha empire for some basic introduction. And are you talking about the same Islam that came as a "light" which justifies pedophilia, slavery, sex slavery, mistreating of non-believers, killing of kaffirs and so on? If yes, then I thank gods a million times for not coming across this horrible "light"🤮🤮🤮
@@shoaibbeg9702Sunni, Shia, Whabbi, Salafi, Berelvi, Sufi and Deobandi ye sab kya? Ashraf pasmanda kya hai? Arabic aur converts kya hai? Bht sare Pakistani Arabs ke dwara kiya jane wala discriminations btate hai. Vo kya h? Tu Saudi jayega toh tu MBS ke saath namaz padega? Tum Islamist kaunsa churan khate ho raat din bhai. Ye dimaagi bankruptcy kyun h tum me?
@@shoaibbeg9702 Tujhe kya lgta hai ki koi b mleech aa jayega humare desh me, humara hi khayega aur hum usko resist nhi karenge? Arey bht logo ne balidaan diya h tab hum aaj Hindu hai. Aap ke purwajo ki taraf nhi ki talwar dekh liya toh vidharmi bn gaye.
Because I have noticed these converts have realised that they were converted now they are trying to portray they converted because of the beauty of Islam. And original Muslim have a much better society such as Saudi arabia. Converts are so confused. May be because of raped ancestors,as they were raped and that's the product . Some genes .
उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम्। वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र सन्ततिः॥ "The country (varṣam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhārata; there dwell the descendants of Bharata." The Bhagavata Purana mentions (Canto 5, Chapter 4)[31] - "He (Rishabha) begot a hundred sons that were exactly like him... He (Bharata) had the best qualities and it was because of him that this land by the people is called Bhāratavarṣa" Bharata Khanda (or Bhārata Kṣetra [32]) is a term used in some of the Hindu texts. In the Sanskrit epic, the Mahabharata (200 BCE to 300 CE), a larger region of North India is encompassed by the term Bharata, but much of the Deccan and South India are still excluded.[33] Some other Puranic passages refer to the same Bhārata people, who are described as the descendants of Dushyanta's son Bharata in the Mahabharata.[34] The realm of Bharata is known as Bhāratavarṣa in the Mahabharata (the core portion of which is itself known as Bhārata) and later texts. According to the text, the term Bharat is from the king Bharata, who was the son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala and the term varsa means a division of the earth or a continent.[citation needed] The use of Bharat often has political overtones, appealing to a certain cultural conception of India.[35] CNN reported in 2023 of president Droupadi Murmu and prime minister Narendra Modi using the Bharat name in connection with a G20 gathering, speculating on a possible name change for the country.
Bharata tribe was Vedic. The Rigvedic culture formed in Punjab. Most of Punjab is in Pakistan. Your country is named after a river in Pakistan (the Indus). It's best you stick to remembering you are an inheritor of the British Raj, and that's it.
brother you can be proud on buddhism which is originated from patna but a guy from patna cannot be proud on its own culture and history just because some muslim elite from UP want to remain in power and create their own nation just by drawing a random line on map. 🙏
Exactly ..he can be proud of the fact that buddhism sort of spread from that area(a religion that has nothing to do with present day pakistan ) to far east and west but a person from Patna should not be proud of his cultural and religious histroy that has roots in Peshawar even though he follows that religion in everyday life
@@sonamkumari-od9nv Biharis have as much similarities to Pakistanis as Pakistanis have to Arab Muslims. Stop making us your fathers. Celebrate your sex temples.
@@ahmedajd164 yes ofcourse ...because there is no relation bw patna and Japan😂...but a Buddhist can be proud of its presence in Japan ...thats how it works... Hope it helps!!
The way he explained that conversion to Islam was peaceful and gradual is a suspect. We have many monuments desecrated whether they are Hindu Buddhist,Jain or universities palaces, forts. A tale of destruction followed since the advent of Islam. He talks about sun temple in Multan but doesn't speak that it was destroyed by Muslims along with so many other rich heritage sites in your part of the india sub continent. All in all that part of history is explained much to smoothly to my liking. Suspect
Let's take a step back and remember why we're all here. We clicked on this video to learn something new, to gain insights, and maybe even broaden our horizons a bit. But instead of diving into something meaningful, we seem to be stuck in a loop of arguments that might never reach a satisfying conclusion. Let's be real, none of us came here to watch a weird TV show, right? We're all sensible folks, and we know that getting into heated debates over something as ambiguous as the ownership of the Indus Valley civilization won't get us anywhere. It's like trying to solve a puzzle with missing pieces. So, how about we put our energy into something more productive? Like sharing our perspectives, listening to each other, and maybe even finding some common ground along the way. And hey, while we're at it, let's not forget to treat each other with respect. We're all here to learn and grow, and that's a lot easier to do when we're not at each other's throats. Let's make this discussion a space where we can all come away with something valuable, whether it's a new idea, a different perspective, or just a better understanding of each other. Sound good? Let's dive back in with that in mind.
Your point is pretty fair. But it is the sheer hypocrisy of these people where they try to portray themselves as an “Islamic country” and conjure hatred for us. And then they’re off to claim a pre-Islamic Indian civilisation all for themselves. It does not make sense.
@@rizwanhussain645 Dholavira, Rangpur, Lothal, Alamgirpur. Bro, the civilisation was that of Indus, and Indus was an India valley. Just because the Pakistani government managed to get a land in the place where many Harappan cities exist doesn’t make them Pakistani. Sudan has more pyramids than Egypt, but still those pyramids are recognised as Egyptian remnants. So Stop being delusional. Get real. Btw, your grandparents were likely “Gangudeshis” as well, since it was all India before 1947
12:53 exactly In "rig veda Mandal 1 sukta 35 sloke 8" supt Sindhu word has used which means 7 rivers or 7 tributaries of Sindhu rivers. Now the point is how they came to word India on that region, in old Persian language( Zoroastrians-parsi ) the Persian used to pronounce word Sindhu as Hindu cause they didn't know how to pronounce later S that's why they called supt Sindhu as hupt Hindu they were not mentioned the river here but the all that geographic region only which were basin of Sindhu river and it's 1200BC old written in their holy book "Zend avesta" or "Zen daschta"
Dear Junaidbhai Greetings from Mumbai. Interesting conversation with young history buff. Guest expressed his opinions on varied topics / eras and also admitting at times that he is not sure of authenticity of what he was narrating. He comes comes out as honest , sincere lad , trying to learn. Few general comments : 1. Pakistanis surely has misconception of their identity , which isnt surprising. As Pakistan was born out of political case presented by Jinnah the lawyer , rather than a grass root politician. In any society the identity can be fluid...at local level one may be Pasthun or Sindhi ...at other level...may be Muslim ...at other level could be Pakistani or even South Asian . 2. Jinnah andMuslim League never fought for freedom of India or Pakistan from British rule . They always attacked Congress leaders and termed them into some Hindu leaders , which is falsely taught and understood by majority of Pakistanis. 3. Modern "Pakistani" History is very old , may be even older than Mohenjo Daro era . Pakistani students and people are main losers when they are taught incomplete or motivated history ..which leads to confusion of their national identity. Even the guest conveniently forgotten to state that great Emperors like Chandra gupta maurya, Ashoka the great etc were all from the land , which is modern day Pakistan. Such selective cherry pickings is prevalent in most of Pakistanis , hence they remain rudderless. 4. If the "Real / Honest" History of today/s Pakistani land is told to the children of Pakistan...new Pakistan will emerge . Till then, confusion shall continue. People need to read books written by credible Historians , Anthropologists etc rather than go by hearsay / anecdotes / sweeping generalisations/ conspiracy theories , unscientific ideas etc. Keep up the good work JunaidBhai to awaken the people to challenge the false narrative being churned out by propagandists.
@@A.R.V_02 No my friend. The subcontinent has a shared history. And we are the same people. The only people who alienate you from your roots are your own citizens and politicians.
@@AmeyVikram16 I am sorry to inform you my friend, we are not the same, like I said north indians are the closest to us Pakistanis and that's it, Bharat follows a reformed shape of hinduism that was made years after the original vedic scriptures which was made in our land, those scriptures were reformed in the 5th century in heartlands of ganga and jamuna, I respect your culture and the ancient, rich history of both ganga and jamuna and I claim none of it and give credits to the people that live there, That is literally all that us Pakistanis ask, please stop claiming our history and lands, your opinion about our government alienating us is although very true, but I am glad many people are waking up, a whole historical renaissance is taking place in Pakistan right as we speak, people like huztory and thousands of others are spreading the light, soon my generation will then be able to teach the generation of our children, our whole history that was unfortunately defied by the generation that came immediately after independence who were too emotional religiously since they saw the oppression and slaughter by the disbelievers onto them
Only thing which connects subcontinent is " Hinduism "..this guy is trying hard to project separate pakistani identity before partition..but al mashudi too has written sun temple in Multan..bhai koi alag culture nai h tumhara..
Their whole nation is based on the fact of proving a different identity somehow. Anyway, I have no hate in my mind. But I seriously hope that people accept their true history and roots.
Your Santana dharma has nothing to do with us, our ancestors followed vedic religion which opposed idol worship, There's a reason why there are more Buddhist stupas in Pakistan than Hindu temples
@@bojpuri423 Pakistan ki tension le bail buddhi. Humara jane de. Balochistan alg roo rha hai. POJK aazadi mang rha hai, election tum karwa paa nahi reh ho, army chal nhi paa rhi...unka kbhi fuel khtm ho jata hai kbhi himmat, industries aane ke jagah jaa rahi hai, log khane bina mar rahe h, 1-1 billion dusro se mang pad rahe h. Aur tu yaha ye bakchodi kar rha h. Dimaag h ya inbreeding k karan khtam ho gaya hai vo bhi?
People of indus valley civilization believed in idol worship, they used to worship trees, sun, earth and idols. If pakistanis are claiming indus valley civilization thay have to claims idol worshiping also, pakistanis have to claim pashupati/ lord shiva 😊 Pakistanis are so confused about their roots, sometimes they find their roots in arabs then turks.we hindus preserve that culture for thousands of years and now some bunch of converted pakistanis claiming that their😅 And this civilization could sustain for thousands of years because there was no islam that time😊
@@Pakistan-_-388 if you can't except pashupati/shiva seal, idol worship, worship of trees,sun,soil which were the core of that civilization then you have no authority to say that you are the one who should represent that ? All those above things that i have written are not about relegion but about the way of living, again I'm saying if you can't except pashupati/ idol worshiping which was an important part of that civilization then you don't have any authority to call that civilization urs. In short your ancestors discarded that civilization and except a foreign concept of living. The real questions should be why did ur ancestors forgot about their real roots and except a foreign concept of living ?? May be they were afraid of Muslims.
@@Pakistan-_-388What does pakistan 🇵🇰 has of its own?? ♦️ Names - Arabic ♦️Religion: Foreign invader's religion ☪️ , was forced by invaders & they sold their mothers to i☪️ invaders then converted ♦️Language: Urdu , its origin: UP 🇮🇳, & other languages like Sindhi Punjabi baloch etc are from sanskrit 🇮🇳 ♦️Clothes, origin india 🇮🇳 ♦️Food origin: india 🇮🇳 mainly Uttar Pradesh's cuisine ♦️History: India's 🇮🇳 ♦️Indus valley: indus ppl worshipping Hindu gods like Pashupati, ivc majority part is in 🇮🇳not 🇵🇰 ♦️Sindu river: origin 🇮🇳 😂whats pakistani🇵🇰 ???? Check origin of everything in your daily life , at least on Google. It will always say 🇮🇳
2:00:02 spot onnnnnnnnnnnn this mixing of culture was in sindh because it was all over india till 1947 !!!! It still continues in india but has stopped in paskistan !!!!!
@@HeliosKapiro you don't need to be from Europe to knoe what is happening in Europe. The point is about hindu hate that is taught in pakistani textbooks while textbooks in india teach communal harmony and brotherhood of mankind. Religion is not even taught. This feeling of brotherhood was prevalent in pakistan as well till 1947 but post independence, pakistan leadership including maulvis and leaders like zia ul haq have preached hatred for the hindus to the extent that minorities in pakistan have dropped from 17 percent in 1947 to less than 2 percent today. In india minorities have flourished and have increased both in percentage and number that theybare leaders of our country today. That's y u don't see any minorities around u because they have been converted or killed by an islamized radicalized society. Your media also cannot speak against the army because they will be abducted whereas india is a free liberal society where u can criticize anything and anyone. The recent killing of Christians and the rigged elections in pakistan are proof of what pak is and where it is heading. You may not like it but these are hard facts. All 4 wars against india have been initiated by pak and then lost by pak. Despite that, india hate and hindu hate is preached. Kashmir is a contentious issue but doesn't justify 4 wars and cross border terrorism killing millions of kashmiris on the india side. Till you don't educate children in pakistan, nothing will change.
He is way younger than you but loved the fact that he’s more mature in his thinking about why we are the way we are instead of focussing on the fact k jese hain hum wese he rahein ge.
@@priyanshukumar7697 Ok Sanjay Dickshit is well read, the one who claims Saraswati Saxenas are responsible for the birth of the Anglo-Saxons.Regards Mrs Priya
@@gangadeshmatakimaut4739 dude I'm not here representing anyone I only meant that the guy is factually incorrect and is just tryna make a intellectual image of himself . He wants to represent Pakistan's ancient accomplishment but the very Pakistan wasnt present then ,it was the history of India and it still is .Pakistan is a recent creation the only history it has is after the partition that's all.
@@priyanshukumar7697 He is referring to coterminous Pakistan not your "Rep of India" ( a day younger than Pakistan), as for Sindhu & its many cognates, Scylax was clear about it's geographical makeup, it was strictly folk residing ALONG the might Sindhu (ancient Pakistanis) not those an 1000miles East.Regards Ganga dweller
Today he is cutting down the history to his region of India to give Pakistanis an identity, a few years he will have to cut ✂️ history to punjab only because nothing else will be left of them.😊 ❤ from the holy birth land of the great emperor Bharata.
They want to mention everything even Buddhist, Jews but not Hinduism lol 😂 …This guy knows the truth but still pushing back lol.. guys who converted 300-400 yrs ago (aka talwar k zor pe salwar) are explaining us our history 😂
Also they criticizing everyone including British but not Islamic invasions and burning of taxalia university and demolishing others temples and recent Buddhists stupas by islamists!
Absofuckinglutely. Itne dishonest log hain. The hatred is so deep rooted they don't even realise people outside Pakistan can still sense it. Not our fault that these guys have been stripped down of all past and been indoctrinated with hindu hate.
Don't you indians feel insulted that you guys are imposing your history on a different nation and the people of that nation curse your Gods but still you beg them to recognise your history as theirs 😂😂
Buddhism became the predominant faith in Gandhara when Kanishka embraced it and became its patron. Subsequently, the Budhism spread from Gandhara all the way to Korea and Japan.
u guys have nothing to do with iindia or indus valley civilization or kanishka u guys are nothing but iinvaders go worship ur aarrabic god & aarrabic rreligio. iindians have their own religion, culture, and festival.
I find it hard to resist comparing this proud Pashtun/Chitrali with several shallow and self-loathing Punjabi “intellectuals” whose only mission is to ridicule their own people at every forum and every opportunity.
Of course you gangadeshi's have a problem with Aryan theory considering it makes y'all look like bunch of nobody pagans who got ran through by the vedic Aryans
Fantastic podcast! An exploration of ancient civilizations and mysteries, focusing on Pakistan's legacy, is a winning combination. I hope there will be more episodes to explore other interesting aspects of our past.
Pakistan has large population of Sindhi and Punjabi speaking people but most the Sindhis in Pakistan can't read or write Sindhi (Khudabadi Script) and Punjabis don't know Punjabi (Gurmukhi) script.
Shukar hai mai in dono mai sai nahi ho 💪💪💪💪or maire aik hazar generations mai sai koi indian nahi hai na baap ki generation mai say na maa ki phir bhi is waqt mai Pakistani 🇵🇰 ho
@@UmairKhan-ht4ku Bhai proud moment hai tere liye bhai. Matlab tu kisi acche desh paranth ka hoga par tere hi purwajo ke karmo ne tje shithole P0rkistan me daal diya. Warna Arab ya Iran me hota. Kya hi baat hoti thi.
@@talaltariqq_😂 pakistanis and their toxicity towards indians. 😂 indians are definitely not pakistani, our history is not shit like urs , we didnt do stuff like 1971 or giving shelter to terrorism
India is, the cradle of the human race, the birthplace of human speech, the mother of history, the grandmother of legend, and the great grand mother of tradition. - Mark Twain
@@ProudMurtadtunnis are only in India but madarsachaap andhnamazis are in 57 islamic countries. So there are more madarsachaap and andhnamazis than tunnis
The Vishnu Purana mentions: ऋषभो मरुदेव्याश्च ऋषभात् भरतो भवेत्।भरताद् भारतं वर्षं, भरतात् सुमतिस्त्वभूत्॥Rishabha was born to Marudevi, Bharata was born to Rishabha,Bhāratavarṣa arose from Bharata and Sumati arose from Bharata.-Vishnu Purana (2,1,31)ततश्च भारतं वर्षमेतल्लोकेषुगीयते।भरताय यत: पित्रा दत्तं प्रतिष्ठिता वनम्॥ (विष्णु पुराण, २,१,३२)This country is known as Bhāratavarṣa since the times the father entrusted the kingdom to the son Bharata and he himself went to the forest for ascetic practices.[30]-Vishnu Purana (2,1,32)uttaraṃ yatsamudrasya himādreścaiva dakṣiṇam varṣaṃ tadbhārataṃ nāma bhāratī yatra santatiḥउत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम्।वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र सन्ततिः॥"The country (varṣam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhārata; there dwell the descendants of Bharata.
it also says Vishnu Purana 2.12.36 “From the waters, which are the body of Vishnu, was produced the lotus shaped earth, with its seas and mountains.”💀😂
hey don't copy paste it is too long --- just write about bharat from himalaya mountain to the sea & give reference of VP with chapter and verse number.
@@urrasscal8380whats the historical evidance of that bs myth? stop living in delusional fairytale, how old is the oldest vishnu purana preserved till now with evidence?
To claim ownership of one's history, one must show reverence for it. I oppose his view on the voluntary adoption of Islam in the Indian subcontinent. The majority were either coerced into conversion or did so for personal gain. It's challenging for Muslims in the subcontinent to acknowledge that their forebears were adherents of Hinduism or Buddhism.
Acha bhai we were coerced. Ab kia chahty ho ab to tum coerce ker rhy ho hamien change kerny k liye. Bhai dekh filhaal hamien islam appeal kerta hay tm apni zindagi jiyo or apny kam sa kam rkho. Ok?
I think present day muslims who were "coerced into conversion" also have Internet access and can read yet they are still choosing to be muslims even after all these years so what's your problem?? Im soo happy my ancestors accepted islam that's all that matters. Stop this forced to convert bs. Also side note when a non muslim accepts islam we don't call them "converts" but rather "reverts".
@@kankan5927 that's the thing. U guys got converted and now act as superior and try to convert others. Minorities har jahag mushkil mein hai but the fact is ki hindus kisi ko convert nhi karte na hi Esa koi concept hai but guys do .jis din tumlog Sach mein ye Maan loge ki tum forcefully ya for profit convert hue the maybe tab ye conversion band kar doge..again my comment is not Islam vs hindu. But it is for the followers of both the religion
Bhai ye khote log h , ab ye bolenge East india company ka name bhi Nehru ne diya tha 😂.yeji yahan gyan prapt raha h or to high school level ka h wo bhi isne propaganda wala use kiya h . 😂
Forced conversion toh tera gangadesh mein bhi ho rahe hai gharwapsi k Naam pe, 2008 kandhamal christian massacre hua tab hazaaro christians ko forcefully convert Kiya tha dinduo ne, history ki toh baat karo he Mat, pata nahi Kitne Buddhists ko maara or convert kiya Hoga Tum logo ne
They adopted the name India in 1947? 😅. Where the hell did Britain east India company come to? Why were the indigenous people of north American continent called "indians" by Columbus? What is this guy trying to prove? 😅
And India Naam hame belong krta hai Jo tume chura lia sasti copy of Indus India 1947😂 real hind real Indus=Pakistan and btw India jaisa Kuch nahi ye Naam British ki wajah se aya real word to Hindustan aur Indus hi hai
@@msdolly6101981 Sindh se hind nikla hai hind se Sindh nhi aur religion matter nahi karta land to hamari thi hai aur rahegi oldest civilization Indus🇵🇰💪
@@zainsepticeye upanishad. BTW 8000 yr temple found in saudi(verify it on google) and islam came in 1400.(stop blsshit claims of adam eve come to archelogical evidences, show a single proof of islam before 1400, just sanchi stupa is older than islam 8tself 😂😂😂)
Bhai aap history sahi nahi padh paye aapki galati nahi, Kushans aar actually Generations of Raja kush ,one of the Son of Sri Ram.So Hindukush mountains ranges are also in the name of King Kush..Aapne pada hain, kam se kam history but agar aap India se padhte aapko aur sahi content milta..
who give a fuck about fake historian he doesnt even have credintials of being a historian, as a historian these wild claims doesnt have any value in the community history and historians
You both are right that that land belongs to you but that equally belongs to people who had to leave in partition . My ancestors moved from Jhang district to Jalandhar district . It happened on the both sides but the cause of this happened is religion which originally doesn’t belong to this land 😊
The rational mind and Pakistani mind are like chalk and cheese . This self proclaimed dentist expert on south Asian history has highly biased views with hue of his mazab and Jinnah .. However, we should thank British agent Jinnah for separating medievals from civilised and taking the former to his new created Lala land …
Iam an Arab in UAE who has interacted with Pakistanis and Indians for the past decade. I more or less understand the language Hindi / Urdu which are very similar... Arabs conquered the Afghans and iranians and converted them to Islam. Arabs also conquered Sindh and thus conversion to Islam began. Pakistanis and Indian Muslims whose ancestors were undeniably Hindu/ Buddhist like to call themselves Arabs/ Turks is because they don't want to accept that their Ancestors were Defeated. It brings a sense of Inferiority Complex to them... Also, Babar who started Mughal empire was an Uzbek ( Central Asian). Muslims of India ( including Pakistan) were governed by foreigner Muslims 99.9% of the time...
urdu is only the national language of pakistan as a lingua franca to unite us all, that doesnt mean we are same with indians. we pakistanis first speak our mother tongue panjabi, sindhi, pashto, balochi, kashmiri only found in pakistan not in india except the panjabis of india but theyre a minority in india. pakistani ancestors before islam was buddhist, zoroastrain and pagans , no one in pakistan calls themselves turks or arabs. we dont have an !nf3r!0rity complex we are all proud of our ethnicities different from indians lol . we pakistanis arent indian muslims we share one ethnicitiy wit india the panjabis and theyre a minority in india and genetically different from other indians. we pakistanis were converted by arabs in the 8th century and sufi preachers in the 11th century . may god guide us all
Me Siddiqui hu cast sy hmary yha bhi arabs wali kahani aam hai 😂😂🙂 hmary bhi bary phary phar kr aye thy or unka shajira bhi bana rakha hai hmari family ny but i am proud sindhi because me es land sy belong krta hu sindh me ziada tar casts unky profession expertise ya kisi skill ki buniyad par huti hai kesy Fisher mans mallah ya mirani black simiths lohar gold smith, sonaro jab Balochistan sy migration huyi thi tab unho ny ju profession chose kia tha un jy hisab sy apni casts rakhi thi ya hu gayi thi jesy lohar baroch, and other casts with like these 😊
باہر سے آنے والے آپ لوگ بلوچ نہیں پتر پہلے تاریخ کا مطالعہ کرو پھر آپ ایسی جھوٹی کہانیوں سے نکل جاؤ گے بلوچوں کی قدیم سلطنت اشکانیان آشکانی جسے پارتھین بھی کہا جاتا تھا جس کی زبان لباس روایات سب کچھ بلوچ رسم و رواج سے تھی اور زیادہ تر بادشاہوں کے نام بالاش تھے یعنی بالاچ ، خواتین بلوچی لباس پہنتی تھی اور مرد بھی بلوچی گیر والا شلوار پہنتے تھے، اس آشکانی سلطنتِ کی سرحدیں موجودہ پاکستان عراق شام افغانستان ترکی آذربائیجان آرمینیا ہندوستان تک پھیلی ہوئی تھی، جس کی بنیاد 223 BC قبل مسیح میں رکھی گئی تھی جو 570 سالوں تک قائم رہی، اس کے علاوہ بھی بہت ساری سلطنتیں تھی ، کوشش کرو قدیم تاریخی کتابوں کا مطالعہ کرو جو یونانی عرب ترک پارسی یہودی عیسائی مورخین نے لکھی ہیں پھر سمجھو گے اور جہاں تک بات سندھ کی ہے تو لفظ سند اور لفظ مہران یہ دونوں بلوچی زبان کے لفظ ہیں، چاہو تو اس بارے میں تحقیقات کرو، اور سندھ کا ویسٹ بینک بلوچستان کا حصہ ہے دریا سندھ سے اس طرف سارا بلوچستان ہے، بلوچ شروع سے اپنی سرزمین پر رہے رہیں ہیں ہزاروں سالوں سے اور ابھی بھی جاکر دیکھو سندھ اکثریت بلوچوں کی ہے، باہر سے آنے تم لوگ ہو بلوچ نہیں، قدیم تاریخی کتابوں میں کسی سندھی قوم کا ذکر نہیں ہے صرف علاقے نام سندھ وہ بھی بلوچی زبان کا لفظ ہے سند بلوچی زبان حدود و باڈر یعنی توڑنا سو کہتے ہیں سندھی کے ویسٹ بینک کو تک کے علاقے کو بلوچوں نے سند کا نام دیا پھر یہاں سے یہ لفظ مشہور ہوگیا، کسی نام نہاد سندھی سے پوچھو سندھ اور مہران کے معنی کیا دیکھنا وہ آئیں بائیں شائیں کرے گا غلط ہی بتاۓ گا، سندھ تاریخ کا ایک ہی کتاب ہے چچ نامہ جس سندھ نامہ بنا دیا 😂 وہ کس نے لکھی آج تک اس کے مؤرخ کا پتہ نہیں علی کوفی بندے نے اس کا ترجمہ کیا ہے جس راجہ چچ کو سندھی کہا جاتا ہے وہ اصل میں باہر سے آنا والا مہاجر تھا کشمیر سے آنے والا وہ سندھ کا باشندہ ہی نہیں تھا اصل میں وہ راۓ خاندان کا راجپوت تھا، بلوچوں کے خلاف سازشیں انگریز سامراجوں کے آنے بعد شروع ہوئی کیونکہ بلوچوں نے سندھ کیلئے بیشمار قربانیاں دی ہیں انگریز کے خلاف لڑے ہیں چاۓ اندونی سندھ ہو یا کلاچی کراچی بلوچوں نے ہمیشہ انگیزیوں کے خلاف سخت مزاحمت کی ہے اسی طرح ہر مقام پہ بلوچوں نے انگریز کے خلاف شدید مزاحمت کی اس جنگ بلوچستان کا سربراہ خان آف قلات میر محراب خان احمد زئی بلوچ شہید ہوۓ اور اسی طرح سندھ میانی کی جنگ میں ایک ہی دن میں صرف 7000 ہزار بلوچ شہید ہوۓ مگر بلوچوں نے مزاحمت نے چھوڑی انگیز کو اسی بات کی جلن تھی دوسری طرف بلوچ کی اکثریت انگیز کی فوج میں کراۓ کے سپاہی بننے سے انکار کرتے تھے پھر انگیزوں نے ٹھان لی کہ بلوچوں کے سبق سیکھایا جاۓ سب سے پہلے انگیزیوں نے بلوچستان کے ایک حصے کو 1893 میں افغانستان ڈال دیا پھر دوسرے حصے کو 1928 میں ایران میں ڈال دیا صرف بلوچوں کی طاقت کم کرنے کیلئے اس کے بعد بلوچستان کے بہت سارے علاقوں کو پنجاب میں ڈالا ، جس میں ، ڈیرہ غازی خان راجن پور تونسہ شریف رحم یار خان لیہ بکھر مظفر گڑھ صادق آباد ، پھر بہت سارے علاقوں کو سندھ میں شامل کردیا ، جس میں کلاچی کراچی جیکب آباد دادو قمبر شہداد کوٹ کشمور کند کوٹ شکار پور شامل تھے، ایک علاقہ NWF میں ڈالا ڈیرہ اسماعیل خان ، پھر جب انگریز سامراجوں نے پوکستان کو تخلیق کیا تو انہوں نے سازشوں کے تحت بلوچستان کے آخری چار ریاستوں کو زبردستی پوکستان نے انگریز سامراجوں کے ساتھ ملکر 27 مارچ 1948 کے دن بلوچستان پہ جبری قبضہ کر لیا ، بلوچستان میں آج تک جبری قبضے کے خلاف جنگ آزادی جاری ہے تاریخ بہت لمبی ہے آپ سے درخواست ہے قدیم مستند تاریخی کتابوں کا مطالعہ کرو جو 18 سو 15 سو 12 سو 1 ہزار سال پہلے لکھی گئی تھی ، آج کل خاص کر کچھ پنجابی سندھی پشتون سرائیکی بلوچوں کے خلاف سازشیں کر رہے ہیں غلط تاریخ کو بیان کیا جا رہا ہے، ان کے مفادات بہت سارے ، سندھ کی اکثریت بلوچ، جنوبی پنجاب کی اکثریت بلوچ، اور بلوچستان میں صرف ٥ ٪ علاقے ہیں پشتونوں کے ہو بھی افغان باڈر کے علاقے تک محدود ہیں، بہت سارے مفادات ہیں بہت سارے مثال ہیں، اور سب جانتے ہیں بلوچ کبھی اپنی سرزمین سے دستبردار نہیں ہونگے، چاۓ کراچی ہو یا اندونی سندھ کے علاقے یا جنوبی پنجاب کے علاقے ، یا افغانستان میں ڈالے گئے علاقے یا ایران میں ڈالے گئے علاقے ، آخری بات یہ بروچ والا نظریہ کچھ پنجابی نسل کے لوگوں نے بعد میں پیش کیا کہ کس طرح بلوچوں کے تقسیم کیا جاۓ آج بھی سندھ کے بلوچوں کو بولا جاتا ہے تم بلوچ نہیں ہو بلکہ بروچ ہو 😂 مگر ان سازشی لوگوں کے تمام سازشیں ناکام و نامراد ہوۓ ہیں بہت حد سے زیادہ بغض پایا جاتا ہے، آج کل کچھ مہاجر پناہ گزین بھی ان کے ساتھ ملکر بلوچوں کے خلاف سازشیں کر رہے ہیں، سندھی بولنے زیادہ تر آپ راجپوت ملے یا پنجابی ہے بہت بڑا مزاق جاری ہے جس کو دیکھو خود کو سندھی بنا رہا ہے، خود گالی دے رہا ہے تاریخ میں سندھی نام کی کوئی قومیت نہیں ہے ، محمد ﷺ کی ایک حدیث مبارک ہے کہ جس نے اپنی قوم بدلی اس نے اپنے باپ سے انکار کیا جو سخت عزاب کا شکار ہوگا ، کچھ اس طرح کی حدیث مبارک ہے الللہ پاک کمی پیشی معاف کرے
When you are talking about history there are 2 problems with that argument 1. You forget the people who u threw out on the name of islam are the original inhabitants of these cultures like hindu sindhis, kashmiri pandits because they were carrying the legacy and traditions of these cultures. Without following the culture and its customs you want a part of it now as it makes money for you. 2. The day your ancestors converted to islam you detached yourself from the lineage of this culture you are trying to claim now. you are now what is called adha tittar aadha bter. You cannot have it both ways. So you have to leave one of them and choose what you are. Indians on the other hand are still carrying those original traditions and customs that originated in these civilizations and are preserving it from millennia in face foreign terrorists for 1000 years and have sacrificed so much to safeguard it.
British people came in search of India and landed in eastern side, vasco d gama came in search of India and landed in kerala, that shows what india was for Greece people, you better learn some history first.
LMFAOOO the greeks made the word indos when conquering pakistan from sindos , the british COINED THE WORD for the whole subcontinent the word india was known as a GEOGRAPHICAL location not a country. you better learn some history first.
@@user-fw5gp2me9b European were searching for india for spice trade cos india were biggest spice producer, they traded spices for years from kerala, I mean you can claim that you are india or turk or arab keep claiming no one cares 🤣🤣🤣
What an absolute gem of a video. This should be shown in every single history and culture classroom in Pakistan. The government should officially patronise and spread all this information. There is far too much knowledge, nuance and vocabulary thats so crucial to understanding the whole conversation and context around Pakistani history, and how it unfortunately gets lost and unclaimed, instead claimed by our neighbours. I hope this video, and every single post and article by Huzaifa never ever gets lost and remains on the internet forever. I hope it gets published in books and media programmes throughout the country. Pakistan needs some serious work done on recognising and being proud of all this. Instead we accept a very defeatist and self-loathing attitude, often stemming from current political/economical frustrations, which is unfair to do.
@@Pakistan-_-388There was india, indica, Al hind, hindustan throughout history. There was never a Pakistan as even the concept of Pakistan never existed before 1930s. Even the present Pakistani territories were seen as hindustan only.
@@mukundmathers aur wo indica hamare Indus ko dia gya tha Greeks ne 😂 aur Tum is British ke diye huye India ko usse link de rahe ho Sirf Naam adopt Karne se ban jaoge Malik?
@@mukundmathers India bhi yahi generate hua Hindustan bhi aur hum real word use karte hai hind India nahi India kabhi bhi accept nhi kia humne na hi kabhi official Naam tha Tumne to bas Naam churaya hai and Pakistan is Indus valley real Hindustan dot.
@@Pakistan-_-388 1. Indus flows through India also. 2. India or hindustan was land beyond the indus stretching till bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean. 3. So you agree Pakistan is hindustan only?
Being an Indian, I used to think that there would be some logical and knowledgeable people in Pakistan who would have been isolated, but now I am able to understand that those whom Pakistani people consider as so-called intellectuals are nothing but Wikipedians with half-baked knowledge and Conspiracy theory believers and they are imaginary intellectuals who live in an imaginary world of their own. Finding intellectuals in Pakistan is like finding a pearl in the desert which will never be found.
if you’re brave enough to call someone a conspiracy theorist or a fake intellectual than why don’t you show us your level of education by countering our facts? oh you can’t! because your brain is filled with nothing more than RSS propaganda 😂😂
Before the Islamization of the northwestern frontier of the subcontinent, the people and cultures in that region shared a common history, as evidenced by references to Gandhara in the Mahabharata. While the current demographic differences between nations may be significant, it is essential to acknowledge the deep-rooted similarities in the ancient history of the subcontinent. Regardless of the labels used, it is widely recognized that the region once boasted a rich and prestigious ancient civilization predating any Abrahamic religion. Therefore, it is fair to assert that this civilization was not inherently tied to Abrahamic ideologies. lastly Kudos to Huzaifa for bringing and taking a pride in his own culture. All the best, Brother for your pursuit. Love and respect from India.
He is not taking pride in Indian culture. He is dropping subtle hints again and again. He is a Muslim supermacist. He is saying that all the intellectual property produced by the ancient people of North Western Bharat is of today's Pakistan. Why we Indians are so naive. And can't see hatred eyes for us in their eyes.
@@Vk-sk7nm I dont agree with you. The thing is that even in India if you go to south people regardless of religion take pride in their history. But in north india ethnicity is not valued as much as religion. People of punjab and sindh should take pride in their past regardless of their religion.
Agreed with Huzaifa. Before hundreds of years if today's Pakistan doesn't existed than similarly modern day "Bharat" also wasn't there. This region was divided and ruled by multiple Kingdoms. It were the Mughals & the Britishers who united these two different regions of Indus valley (where modern day Pakistan is situated) and Gangetic - Yamuna plains (where modern day Bharat exist).
Madarsachaap Indias real name is Bharat which is 10000 years civilization. Pakistan was born on 1947 . Pakistan was a part of India. Pakistan exist because of India
Madarsachaap Indias real name is Bharat which is 10000 years civilization. Pakistan was born on 1947 . Pakistan was a part of India. Pakistan exist because of India
India me Class 9 se ancient India studies (history section of social science) me ye sab padhaya jata hai. This makes young Indians awar of his/her identity. It ensures that no amount of crisis can uproot indian identity.
@@zsa2000kisne bol nhi h . Every history book mention them abe repetitive ho gya issiliye syallabus kaam kiya . Jaise 9 th mein padha toh 11th mein bhi wahi padna h . Issiliye kaam kiya remove nhi kiya .
32:49 there is a book named BRIHATKATHAKOSHA written by gunadaya during gupta age , majority of its stories were similar to 101 arabian nights , and one of the story of sindbad was also mentioned in that book. Majority of historians believed that brihatkathakosha was the original text.
Nation state concept is very recent.. but this entire civilisation has been called as “India” even before Alexander….and even before that it was called “Bharat”
Except not an iota of evidence to back up your spurious claims of Bharat & Bharatvarsha...as for India then please refer to Scylax who mentioned it strictly as folk living along banks of mighty Sindhu(ancestors of Pakistanis) & not your Aghori Baba forefathers in the forests of the ancient Ganga Basin!Regards
@arjunr5578 LOL, Hinduism in context of religion formalised in 1833, defined as any religious belief that's NOT Abrahamic, Sikh, Buddhist or Jain, bottomline so called Hinduism was defined by NOT WHAT IT WAS BUT RATHER BY WHAT IT WAS NOT...Let this sink in!
@@rizwanhussain645 says a guy who follows a arabic cult which rejects scientific evolutionary theory 😂 Sanskrit language is as old as 3,000 years even before your Islam was invented 😂
@@rizwanhussain645the word “Bharata” or “Bharata varsh” started during Rig Vedic period after Dasarajna war and further the boundaries are specified in one of the oldest puranas.. i.e Vishnu Purana…
When you invite a 20 year old boy as a historian in your podcast reflects your intellect level as a host of a pakistani podcast. Pakistan for you👇:- 1. Converted Muslims from Hindus(Sanatani) by force. 2. Radicalised by a book. 3. Divided a piece of land from India over Islamic radical thoughts.
The history of religious conversion in the Indian subcontinent is complex and varied, and it cannot be generalized as a simple process of forced conversion to Islam. While there were instances of coercion and force used by rulers at certain times and in certain regions, it's important to recognize that religious conversion occurred through a combination of factors, including political, social, economic, and cultural influences. Islam spread to the Indian subcontinent primarily through trade, migration, and the efforts of Sufi saints and missionaries who preached and propagated the faith peacefully. Many people converted to Islam voluntarily, attracted by its teachings, beliefs, and the opportunities it offered. Additionally, the Indian subcontinent has a long history of religious pluralism, and communities of various faiths often coexisted and interacted with one another. While there were periods of religious conflict and tension, particularly during times of political upheaval and conquest, it's essential to acknowledge the diversity of experiences and perspectives within the region's history of religious conversion.
There is a ashoka's house or rest place in kotli pakistan side jammukashmir basically it is made by cutting the whole mountain if u look it looks marvelous and sorry for bad english.❤
1:57:32 Moses Somake (6 June 1875 - 6 April 1947) was a British architect known for designing several prominent buildings in British India. His works, built before the Partition of British India and located in modern-day Pakistan, include the Edward House, BVS Parsi High School, Karachi Goan Association building, Khaliq Dina Hall, Mules Mansion and Quaid-e-Azam House.
All I see is ad hominem attacks from foreigners from the East, yet no rebuttal 😂shows how much of an MELTDOWN this prodigious young chap has caused to these Ganga dwellers 😂😂😂😂
he is narrating a another type of pak studies , if hindu politician were cunning then they would have expelled all muslim from india but muslim population in india exploded from 3 crore to 21 crore isnpite of voting of Pakistan and Bangladesh
@shreeyanksinghvi7748 And should have moved to natural proximity of E. Pakistan which incidentaly was imposed on Jinnah bottomline Gangetic Bengal was never part of Iqbals vision.Regards Gangadeshi
It's not sushruta it was CARAKA(Medicine Doctor)in kaniska's time. Sushruta was the Father of plastic surgery in indian history
Bishamitra's son Maharishi sushruta was born in Varanasi
Bhai ye immature half-baked historian sab ulta pulta bak raha hai yahan...
According to whom Abhijit Chavda or Sanjay Dickshit ?😂😂😂😂😂
When you invite a 20 year old boy as a historian in your podcast reflects your intellect level as a host of a pakistani podcast.
Pakistan for you👇:-
1. Converted Muslims from Hindus(Sanatani) by force.
2. Radicalised by a book.
3. Divided a piece of land from India over Islamic radical thoughts.
He is not right in everything. He is mixing many things. Needs to study more from right sources. Too young to be knowledgeable rightly.
@yashpednekar331 Yes he needs to study from Abhijit Chavda and Sanjay Dixit, bottomline from Amu Darya to Bay of Bengal is one people, one culture, one lingua franca and one civilization! Gangadesh mata ki jai!!!!
The best part of this podcast is every time the guy states a fact, he adds “I might be mistaken”. This one sentence shows the difference between a learned and an ignorant man.
He thinks he is smartest guy in room in the room
@@wolf_crusher He probably is as well
he is mostly wrong
Ap koi bhi 5 fact uthao aur correct ker k video bana k daldo. Ap k pas kuch hai tau batain yar, batein mut .... plz
Apna mulk dekh le, 76 saal se video me tu bhi hai @@munvaray
Non Muslim Indians feel more attached to historical sites like Taxila and ancient culture . One example of this is that they still name their kids in the same language as their ancestors and identify more with them.
Obviously bro wo to attached honge Wo Na to convert hue hai or na hi Identity crisis hai to Zahir si baat hai bhai 😊
But both are Buddhist universities.
Just like Indian Muslims hindus have nothing to do with these universities😂😂
☝️🤓🤓🤓
@@mayankindian3750 the Vikings converted to christianity.the khazars converted to judaism.hindus converted other people to Hinduism.whats your point??
@@mayankindian3750 identity crisis??Tum log Indus ki history chori karne ki Koshish karte ho wo identity crisis Mai nhi ata💀💀
In India we still teach at school that “Taxilla, Nalanda ka itihaas laut ke aayega” which means Indian universities shall once day reach the glory of universities like Taxilla and Nalanda where all students from Asia will come to learn.
that is not taxila its taksh shila
They are same,
@@SELMONBOI251 taksh shila se hee taxila nikla hai. its the same
❤ Thankyou for remembering this small area.
I am from Taxila Pakistan
You are gangudeshi. India doesn't exist eastern side of Indooz aka Indus Valley. There's a difference between British created India and the India of Sindh which is connected to Kashmir, Balochistan, Western Punjab and Gandhara civilization of Afghanistan. Basically current Pakistan.
Therefore, Hinduism is not a religion but a culture of the Indian subcontinent...which is made up of different cultures...😊
Hinduism in a relgious sense is indeed a religion. Or else it is a culture.
Hinduism is religion but it is not like the abrahamic onces..
It's made up by all the cultures of Indian subcontinent
@@MustafaAli-lb8dq Hinduism Is a Culture not religion Like Islam, Christianity...
@@MustafaAli-lb8dq Hinduism has no one fixed book, teacher, prophet or set of instructions. It is not unified and has a lot of diversity. It is not like the cult which calls others “Kaafir” and invades them.
@@MustafaAli-lb8dq Are you even getting what you are saying ?!?
Huzaifa is a 💎, I’ve been waiting for this podcast to be uploaded since weeks 😍
He is an true GEM of Pakistan.👌
As an Indian I think my ancestors have been in this land for thousands of years . They may have different religion but I am Muslim now . But that’s still don’t disconnect me from my land . Unless Pakistani who starts their story from 1947 .
Yes, according to the standards of education in history prevalent in India. You probably didn't even listen to this podcast at all but if you start listening from 8:05, the answer to your POV is already there.
@@balajjamal2671he is always indian not like you 1947 born baby Pakistan 😂😂😂
@@balajjamal2671not legitimate answer
"Unless Pakistani who starts their story from 1947 ." We start our story from when our ancestors began, which is thousands of years old, we aren't disconnected either and good, keep connecting to your own country.
@@Avicerox problem is that why this historian single handedly saying that only Pakistanis are descendants.
Nice to see huzaifa on the podcast, been following him since 2020 on Twitter, great guy.
Well! Cowards who submitted to Islam got converted. For so long, they tried to become arabs and now when they are kicked from everywhere, they try to become who they ceased to exist long ago.
Coward converts have no claim to history.
1:16:29 university of taxila could not be establish during Achaemenid dynasty because panini's time is during 600 bc and panini himself wrote that before him there was also a long tradition of teachers at taxila, even many kings during mahajanapada time were students of taxila 1:20:03
Huzaifa is just like a encyclopedia of history . He is a gem.
Guy thinks aryan invasion actually happened. What encyclopedia lol
@harveyspecter111 Forgive him if he takes your Mandirchaap history with an huge mountain of salt!comprende Mandirchaap.
@@rizwanhussain645mandirchap is way better than being madrsachp chtye
@@rizwanhussain645why is saying that we should claim as descendants of ivc?
@@harveyspecter111 No saar Aryan theeeeoori fake saar, saar out of endia theeeeoori rael saar saar we dindus waz kangs saar
Wow I’m amazed the things he’s talking about are taught in Indian schools at such young age My son is in class 6 and he’s learning about Taxila…n spread of Buddhism and Jainism in India…along with tht all about the great Indian rulers…The Mauryas…The Guptas…The Cholas…
No wonder Indians sense of identity and cultural pride is so deep rooted…Huge respect fr all the Indian educationists and Indian Historians.
He clearly mentioned that this stuff is not taught to kids in Pakistan. Try taking into context of why he’s saying what he’s saying instead of boasting about the teaching of history in ur country
Muthiyana band kar bhai 😂
@@umerghaffar4686 He also clearly said that Maurya and Taxila are heritage of Pakistan and India doesn't exist on the eastern side of Indus valley i.e current India. The cholas hated Indus valley and its kings cuz these kingdoms have always invaded and plundered ganga jamuna. Mauryans alone killed millions of ganga jamuna
It is a matter of Pride… a Heritage we Indians have always been proud of something you guys have woken up after 76yrs and suddenly realized is a shared heritage…Obviously we are going to boast about it good, bad or ugly…we have owned up to our history.
@@shashwatdevbhaag bsdk pajeet
Story of Ghazni was "created" by British.. How conveniently he says kings of same religion also used to loot each other's wealth.. And why was Mahmud ghaznavi called Butshikan then.. what does that word mean?
True...this guy is doing subtle propaganda.
Ghazni lost against indian king.
a pakistani muslim always know how to twist facts which goes against his/her faith. you can easy identify these traits with pakistani community anywhere in the world. These shameful people identify themsleves as Indians in europe. their current socio-economical state tells the truth which almost all Pakistanis try to hide.
@@TabraizBajkaniand fled many indian kings
You may not like to use the word Indian subcontinent because you think it’s political word , but the term is geographical representation of tectonic plate which is called India so you may like it or not you cannot remove India from Pakistan if you talk about history, the problem here is Pakistan never considered non-muslims born in Pakistan region as there heroes , and for India anyone born in this region was Indian
But by your logic,it is actually India that is a part of Pakistan and India is named after a Pakistani river.
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 the Pakistani river originates from India, the word Sindhu is Sanskrit name, the Greeks would call Indica based from Sindhu, Arabs will call Hindustan again based on Sindhu.
The Pakistani identity is merely on paper, Pakistan people itself are called Hindus by Arabs. I have been restaurant overseas and found large numbers of Indian restaurants owned by Pakistani / Bangladeshi that itself speaks identity
@@embeddedprojects2336 I'm gonna stop you right there because the Indus starts in china.And,the Nile starts in Ethiopia but,everyone counts it as an Egyptian river because it has the most of the Nile,so your arguments are invalid.And the Pakistani identity is that of the Indus valley,not Arab or turk.
@@m.aryaanamiri2755 Pakistan identity should be Indus valley but what percentage of Pakistani believe that ? Also Indus valley was discovered in early 19th century before that there is no such direct historical records of trade or anything, only Vedas have some mentioned of that region along with a river Saraswati whose flow over time reduced. Much of Arab, Greek, Persian and East Asian trade history is again with modern day India.
Most of the present region of Pakistan was always under foreign rule starting from Darius in 500BC.
@@embeddedprojects2336 as husaifa said,only the British discovered the Indus valley in 19th century,but the locals knew of it's existence because if the existence of monuments and cities.And only a small amount of the population claims to be foreign.Most people either take pride in their local identity,or they simply point out that their ancestors were foreign,while they themselves have adopted local cultures.
00:03 Oldest proof of cotton cultivation in Indus Valley
04:27 Exploring history, mythology, and cultures through literature and social media.
11:23 Pakistan's history spans over 5,000 years of cultural evolution.
15:10 Pakistanis are deeply connected to their shared history.
21:57 Peshawar became a prominent city connecting traders and civilizations.
24:47 Gandhara region's important history and ancient trading routes
30:47 Onions connected with 18th-century South Asia trading routes.
34:30 Fables and stories from South Asia traveled to the Arab lands
43:15 Discovery of the ancient Greek temple in Pakistan and its destruction by the British
46:28 Pakistan's history includes Hinduism and Buddhism as major religions
54:08 Translations of knowledge can be problematic.
57:36 Understanding the historical narrative of Pakistan's formation
1:03:54 Coffee's origin and impact on Muslim society
1:06:48 The significance of Star of David in Pakistani history
1:12:37 Persian Empire's expansion into Pakistan
1:15:25 AR Empire's use of ancient script in Pakistan
1:23:27 The roots of the Kalash people and their historical connections
1:25:57 Discussion on the history and cultural evolution of the people in Northern chatral
1:32:28 Pakistan has a rich history in cotton cultivation and dentistry
1:36:53 Pakistan's resistance against Alexander the Great and the influence of colonial languages on the region's identity
1:44:39 Pakistanis struggle with identity crisis due to historical and ideological factors
1:48:09 Debate over Pakistani culture and influences.
1:56:35 Transformations in Karachi's history and culture
2:00:18 Pakistan's youth holds strong ideology and understanding of politics.
2:07:13 Gandhi's decolonization efforts and health struggles.
2:09:53 The complexity of the 1947 partition
2:16:04 British scholars played a significant role in documenting South Asian history and folklore.
2:18:42 British conquest of the region due to propaganda and strategic reasons.
2:24:58 Climate change led to migration and genetic mix in South Asia
2:28:16 Indian ancient structures and history
2:36:26 Ancient history of Pakistan and the translation of Quran into a local language.
2:39:59 Pakistan's rich history, folklore, and culture
2:48:25 Discussion on mythical creatures and their historical origins
2:52:02 Discussion on Pakistan's folklore, trophy hunting, and cultural practices.
What Pakistan? Your whole country is owned by India. You guys are obsessed with Bharat! 😁 Come on! Don’t lie!!!!
Pakistan was an artificial creation of the twentieth century. It neither has, nor ever will have anything to do with the history of India(subcontinent). Pakistani “history” begins from 1947. Before that it’s Indian history, as even Pakistan was a part of India.
Entire Indus valley civilisation is about Shiva, Sarees bangles which are completely Indian
takhashila, nalanda is a Hindu university taught By Chanakya
Literally read about Indus valley civilisation in ancient India
it’s nt just Indian/ Pakistani history it’s Hindu History…the subjects thy were teaching were Vedic Studies and Hindu Astrology…Chanakya was one of the teachers there…it was ruled by our great rulers Chandragupta Maurya and his successor Ashoka the great…Pls do a deeper research about Takshashila first.
How was Pakistan created ? by RELIGIOUS idealogy you wanted to be MUSLIMS thats how you got Pakistan
even the name Pakistan is not yours, Its persian
for you to be descendants of Indus valley civlisation you have to be Indiainised, not persian/arabic
Chanakya a Hindu, whose motive was Hindu rajya taught in Takhashila which is in modern day Pakistan. Nalanda the worlds oldest university in now in modern india, which Chanakya ALSO taught and visited.
Buddhas statues were destroyed in Afghanistan by Taliban in 2001. Thats how widespread the Indian dharmic culture was.
You know who destroyed them both? Muslim invaders.
now choose, are you PAKISTANI a MUSLIM INVADER or are you INDUS VALLEY DESCENDANT which is a HINDU VICTIM?
The fable he is talking about is Panchatantra written by Vishnu Sharma.
The book by shuruta is called shusruta samhita.. detailed anatomy of human body and plastic surgery.
Takshshila (Taxila now) and Nalanda were the top educational institutions of the sub continent.. it is said that when the books in Nalanda were burned, the fire kept on going for weeks... More than 10 millions books were burned.
To learn more about the golden age of Islam ( which Westerners term as dark ages cuz according to them nothing happened in the entire world before renessaince) kindly refer to lectures by Dr Roy casagranda.
Ancient Pakistan doesn’t exist 😂😂😂
Peshawar was called purushpura and was capital of ganghara. Ruled by Hindu shahi king jaypal before Ghori invasions.
Yes and Taj mahal was tejomahalya and a great hindu king built it and definitely not Shah jahan.
😂@@Thestrong11
@@Thestrong11 bhai sahab Islam came much later.
@@Thestrong11 abe gadhe international authors k history books hi padh le.....purushpura naam tha.....tere se pakistani education system ne sb chupaya h...thora jahaalat se baahr nikal...duniya bahot bari h
@@Thestrong11Hindu kings had better things to do then make tombs for dead people 😂😂😂😂. BTW truth will be pit soon. Babri Masjid was built on temple. Islamic kings were too arrogant to remove all the proofs of existing temples. what a bunch of fools. Thank God all the fools migrayed to Foolishtan
"Islam is in its origins an Arab religion. Everyone not an Arab who is a Muslim is a convert. Islam is not simply a matter of conscience or private belief. It makes imperial demands. A convert's worldview alters. His holy places are in Arab lands; his sacred language is Arabic. His idea of history alters. He rejects his own; he becomes, whether he likes it or not, a part of the Arab story. The convert has to turn away from everything that is his." ---- V S Naipaul
This comment has to be one of the top contenders for the biggest piece of bullshit that is part of this vast and mostly ludicrous comment section. Whoever Naipaul is, that man is smoking on some filthy stuff, I’ll tell you that.
I've seen like 10 of your comments... someone's hurt 😂😂
Har convert ko lgta hai ki vo original hai. Ye case me toh jo role model se related books h usme bhi idols ko destroy krne ki baat hai. Yaha toh originals bhi converted hi hai
@@unit4593it's exactly the same circumstances with every Muslim 😂
@@Fgghhnh2345 Right, Now what would a butthurt anti-Islamic ultracrepidarian such as the likes of YOU, know or feel about the sheer beauty and blessing of being a Muslim. These petty comments don’t faze us the lease bit, lad, never will. So whatever helps you sleep at night lmao.
indus velly civilization is indian history then pakistan created from india , if you think indus velly civilization is only pakistan history is wrong becasue there is lots indus velly civilization center is in india . so only selected history is not workable remember chankhya studied in taxsila but he make chandragupta king and its capital was patliputra in modern bihar .
But Pashtun Baloch do not belong to Indus Valley Civilization pashto Balochi language both are Persians Farsi language har Pakistani Punjabi sindhi Nahi hota dono civilasation Ka mixture ha Pakistan 🇵🇰
@@UmairKhan-ht4ku sindhi aur punjabi toh haina😂
@@UmairKhan-ht4kuindus people used to speak proto Dravidian language
@@Fgghhnh2345 to Mai kya Karo ?? Mai apna batasakta Hu Sindhi Punjabio Ka thodi
@@UmairKhan-ht4ku koi baat nahi
He is saying that everybody peacefully converted to Islam....if you have to pay jajiya tax then of course you will convert right
Good point, I think Salman Rashid explains this much better in his discussion on the Pakistan Experience
jizya was 1.5 percent of yearly wealth.The zakat,the tax for muslims is 2 persent.Meaning being a muslim was more expensive so your logic seems incomplete.
Bilkul agar kisi gareeb ko jizya Dena pade toh wo convert toh ho hi jayega baki talwar ki zor pe toh huye hi the..
@@Rakshita442 only rich people payed jizya idiot.And even then,it was around 2% of yearly income.
@@12SPASTIC12 Salman Rashid couldn't differentiate between Balochistan and Sindh.Calling Balochistan the Indian satrapy when the very name of India comes from Sindh.
Chanakya 2000 years ago described what is Bharat and its borders
Lol.. ghazwa e hind is to make u slave..😂 ab bol salay..
ha ha ha chanakya farzi hai....koi archeological evidence nahi hai uska
The fable he is talking about is Panchatantra written by Vishnu Sharma.
The book by shuruta is called shusruta samhita.. detailed anatomy of human body and plastic surgery.
Takshshila (Taxila now) and Nalanda were the top educational institutions of the sub continent.. it is said that when the books in Nalanda were burned, the fire kept on going for weeks... More than 10 millions books were burned.
To learn more about the golden age of Islam ( which Westerners term as dark ages cuz according to them nothing happened in the entire world before renessaince) kindly refer to lectures by Dr Roy casagranda.
taxila and nalanda both were Buddhist universities.
@@0bajwa0Nalanda University was built by Kumaragupta of the Gupta dynasty in the 5th century BC. Prominent rulers of the time, including King Harshavardhana of Kannauj, Pala Rulers, and many scholars patronized Nalanda.
The time period this gentleman is talking / referring is when Pakistan was not existing, the area was not invaded by islamists, the world used to come to India through different routes. Indus was one of them.
Mohenjodaro was part of the civilisation which was spread across today's Pakistan, East India.
You are very true, however the majority of the Indus civilization is where is today's Pakistan, mostly Punjab and Sindh, offcourse everything around were also influenced.
There was no india too. Indian subcontinent is never united. Its the mix of different cultures and religions. India didnt exist before 1947. The word india is itself derived from indus which originates from Tibet and flows into modern day pakistan.
@@hamadkhan4702 We Gandoodeshis will never accept any identity/name imposed on us by the foreigners - be it Bharat, India or Hindoostan. We are the proud aborigines living in the Gangoodesh for trillions of years and this is our only true identity.
@@hamadkhan4702 ya I know current India did not exist before 1947 because Pakistan as a part separated from it. but how can you say India did not existed before 1947 just to satisty the formation of Pakistan which was just a line write down by a British on Indian map. At the same time you are saying India is derrived from the word Indus and every Indian knows it very well but the question is who derived it ? is it Nehru ?? JInha ? in 1947. and the guest is also just denying the fact you were also called Indian before 1947. and the identity crisis is real in Pakistan that's for sure what kind things you can present the world that is not a very Indian thing. that only Pakistan have??. Urdu language is originated in India, all your food covered under Indian food except few. you looks exactly same as a normal Indian looks except may be your religion could be diffrent that's personal, if the religion makes you diffrent from India than what about Indian muslims? you are exactly same as Indian muslims. I know India was not united before 1947 it was princely states but scripture whether its from Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism called the land from Himalaya to Indian Ocean Bharat or Bharatwarsha, I am not forcing you to admit that hinduism are the oldest religion in this region I know you are not gonna do that. as you are saying the word India comes from Indus and you forget the word hindu also derive from Indus itself. the people who comes from west used to called the people hindus who lives alongsie with sindu river. they gave the name hindu to the indigenous people from this region. that is very stupid argument saying only the people lives alongside with sindu river are descendent of Indus Valley civilisation. don't you think people migrated from Indus to different part of India after the civilisation ended? . You are just justifying yourself and the creation of Pakistan by saying India also did not exist before 1947. how come a company comes from Britain in 1600 and registered itself as East India Company. why did they chose the word India why they did not select the name like Goa, Kolkata, Madras when they arrive in this region. I think they were dreaming at that time in future in 1947 a country called India will come into existence so we should choose the name India. India does not exist as a country at that time nor USA, or any other country in the world because there were no country system at that time but as a region it is always called India or Indian subcontinent. if you don't believe me on India you can check Indian ancient scripture where it is called Bharatwarsh, aryavrat, Arab called this land as Hindustan, and The Greek geographer Herodotus (5th century BC) also described India, calling it hē Hindikē chōrē, which means "the Indus land". The Greeks called India "Indus", while the Iranians called it "Hindu".
@@hamadkhan4702 u call it india , people here living in this land use to call it Bharat varsh like how japan is called Nippon among its people
He's quite an amateur - can you bring professional historians instead. He believes Patna or even Chandigarh has nothing to do with Gandhara for example. It's amusing. His opinions are coming not out of any academic insights but purely an emotional reaction to not getting global respect as a Pakistani. He needs to introspect because this won't take him too far. He's making the same mistake as previous Pakistan Studies - looking at history through an ideological agenda.
He seems an ideologue more than a pro historian.
And you’re doing the same typical Indian thing on claiming everything in South Asia ! Grow up
He gave the perfect counter reaction to how Indians claim history from our part of the land as theirs. Nothing wrong with that aspect. He is talking strictly from Pakistan's point of view and our OWN history from our part of the subcontinent. If you don't want to agree on that, that is a separate issue. Watch Ranveer Allahbadia's podcast if you want to hear what you already believe.
@@haziqajmxl nothing wrong with talking about history from a Sindhi, Panjabi or Balochi point of view. But to project modern borders to history and to say for example that Chandigarh region has no link with Gandhara region, etc. because the Radcliffe line passes inbetween is laughable.
@@noirdezzir8424 That is what he is saying. What happened in Chandigarh during Gandhara period is Chandigarh's or India's history. But what happened in our part of the that civilization is that region's or Pakistan's history.
Thoroughly enjoyed the podcast as I am a big admirer of Huzaifa! Also as a Chitrali, I felt extremely satisfied when you discussed our problems. Allah tate khair korar!
I feel very ashamed that we have been mistreating our Chitrali community. In Punjab the only concept we are given of Chitral is that it's a very backwards area and you can buy their beautiful women for marriage. The fact that we as the people of Punjab get the most development just because we are the majority and politicians live here and Chitrali people don't, goes to show we are an ungrateful nation and we will never succeed in the world.
It is unfortunate that there are negative perspectives about different ethnicities in our country. Similarly, we have been taught many misconceptions about Punjabi people, which may be incorrect, just like your perspective on Chitral. Chitral is one of the most beautiful places in Pakistan, with its lush greenery, welcoming people, and warm hospitality that is difficult to describe in words. People from Punjab, Sindh, and other parts of KPK take advantage of this hospitality. In Chitral, there are Muslims, Kalash, and Ismaili communities, and despite religious differences, we coexist happily. The Kalash have a wedding ritual where, after serving meals, the boy takes away the girl (bhaga k le jana). But it happens ""within"" their community. This doesn't imply that anyone else can come and say, "I want to bring you to my home," not even a Chitrali if he is not from the kalash community. The literacy rate in chitral is very high as compared to any other district of kpk. This huzaifa nizam is a prime example that our soil has the ability to produce many talents, intellectuals and heroes.
He has a preference for referring to our region as "South Asia" instead of the "Indian subcontinent," despite acknowledging that the term "India" has its roots in Sindh.
They want to claim the history, but don't want to associate themselves with "India".
You guys should be copyrighted for naming your country India ☺️
Yes, India The great
Bhai to tum west India naam rakh lo
@@AliHussain-wq4zr
That's pakistani mentality for you. For the past few years most of these overseas Pakistanis are slowly trying to seal Indian history and claim its their. That's because in the world today pakistan is called terrorist country. That's causing embarrassment to these overseas pakistanis
1:39:07 He is basically batting for no we are not Indian argument 😂 bro is super patriotic pakistani...
This podcast is a classic example of how hatred towards a certain religion and region makes one not acknowledge ones history and culture. Despite being asked several times, the gentleman keeps lamenting that Indians should not claim Indus valley civilisation as a part of their history. The dichotomy of the sad fact that it's a shared history, but Pakistanis do not want to associate with it and Indians do.
Yes because pak can never accept any history non islamic
The problem is not hatred, it is the definition of word India. What does India means to you? How do you define it?Which definition are you referring to?
@@TruthPrevailzyour mentality is the typical Indian mentality like what he said. In pakistan punjabis says we we are punjabi phuktoon says we are phuktoon and we together becomes Pakistani. And on other hand Indians says we are Indians the name which was given by Britishers. We are not Indians. We are real sons of indus valley we live in south asia and stop stealing our identity
@@Zain_Hy the guy himself quoted example of pizza base and cheese is same in India and Pakistan 🤣🤣 but your hatred is not ready to accept
Why should a person from Kerala have claims on Indus civilization?
Crazy how he seems to have read all books by Muslim and foreign authors about Indian subcontinent except the very books that are one of the oldest known works of literature from the subcontinent. He might have actually learnt something new other than merely trying to understand his own land through the eyes of people foreign to it themselves. 🤦♂️🤷♂️
That means pakistani Muslim proud on Veda written
Am Nepali I support Khalistan and Nagaland 🐷🇮🇳🐷
@@bojpuri423aacha par apna chehra kyun lagaya hai iss comment mein
sushruta samhita pe bhi claim kar liya inhone
@@sonamkumari-od9nvwahi toh jabiki shuruta current india se the
This was one of the best most informative shows on the forgotten history of this region. kudos
True 👍
if this chomu is your source of information i feel sorry for you..
@@dhairyasatra8277 Better source than Sanjay Dickshit and Abhijit Chavda any day of the week.Regards Mandirchaap!
@@dhairyasatra8277sad lindu stop obsessing over us and stop raping lizards
Indians are always polluting comment sections of Pakistani history videos. It proves what Huzaifa said about Indians claiming rights to all the history of subcontinent because it suits them. Amazing podcast though. Keep it up.
You should go to the land of Muhammad. The whole of India is ours. Your presence/islam’s presence is temporary. It’s only a mere 1400 years, whereas we have lived in this land forever. Your great great great great grandfather was a Hindu and a coward, he converted because he was a coward. So Ramesh, don’t be too angry about it. You are one of us, just from a weak bloodline.
This guest has a funny logic around 55:20 saying "If you are waking up at the middle of the night, doing wazu in cold water to do namaz, you can't be forcefully converted to do it"😂😂😂
The thing is, you just need to convert a family forcefully once. The later generations will get accustomed to the new religion with time as it is the only way they will be exposed to. This doesn't mean their forefathers were not forcefully converted.
Also, read about how jizya was collected from non-Muslims during Mughal era. The jizya collector would literally spit in the mouth of non-Muslims. Humiliation like these also forced people to accept Islam.
If the kings were onto full fledged conversion,there would be no hindu left,the thing is there is difference between todays hindu and medieval hindus. Descrimation by caste, untouchability,inequality was prominent and islam came as a light to indians where all are equals.The king and the beggar pray sidebyside,whereas many lower caste not even allowed to enter temple.
@@shoaibbeg9702 Why do you assume that the were no Hindu, Sikh and other religious Kings who were opposing Islamic invaders? It was because of them why many non-Muslims remained non-Muslims and continued practicing their religion. Read about Maratha empire for some basic introduction.
And are you talking about the same Islam that came as a "light" which justifies pedophilia, slavery, sex slavery, mistreating of non-believers, killing of kaffirs and so on? If yes, then I thank gods a million times for not coming across this horrible "light"🤮🤮🤮
@@shoaibbeg9702Sunni, Shia, Whabbi, Salafi, Berelvi, Sufi and Deobandi ye sab kya? Ashraf pasmanda kya hai? Arabic aur converts kya hai? Bht sare Pakistani Arabs ke dwara kiya jane wala discriminations btate hai. Vo kya h? Tu Saudi jayega toh tu MBS ke saath namaz padega? Tum Islamist kaunsa churan khate ho raat din bhai. Ye dimaagi bankruptcy kyun h tum me?
@@shoaibbeg9702 Tujhe kya lgta hai ki koi b mleech aa jayega humare desh me, humara hi khayega aur hum usko resist nhi karenge? Arey bht logo ne balidaan diya h tab hum aaj Hindu hai. Aap ke purwajo ki taraf nhi ki talwar dekh liya toh vidharmi bn gaye.
Because I have noticed these converts have realised that they were converted now they are trying to portray they converted because of the beauty of Islam. And original Muslim have a much better society such as Saudi arabia. Converts are so confused. May be because of raped ancestors,as they were raped and that's the product . Some genes .
उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम्।
वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र सन्ततिः॥
"The country (varṣam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhārata; there dwell the descendants of Bharata."
The Bhagavata Purana mentions (Canto 5, Chapter 4)[31] - "He (Rishabha) begot a hundred sons that were exactly like him... He (Bharata) had the best qualities and it was because of him that this land by the people is called Bhāratavarṣa"
Bharata Khanda (or Bhārata Kṣetra [32]) is a term used in some of the Hindu texts.
In the Sanskrit epic, the Mahabharata (200 BCE to 300 CE), a larger region of North India is encompassed by the term Bharata, but much of the Deccan and South India are still excluded.[33] Some other Puranic passages refer to the same Bhārata people, who are described as the descendants of Dushyanta's son Bharata in the Mahabharata.[34]
The realm of Bharata is known as Bhāratavarṣa in the Mahabharata (the core portion of which is itself known as Bhārata) and later texts. According to the text, the term Bharat is from the king Bharata, who was the son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala and the term varsa means a division of the earth or a continent.[citation needed]
The use of Bharat often has political overtones, appealing to a certain cultural conception of India.[35] CNN reported in 2023 of president Droupadi Murmu and prime minister Narendra Modi using the Bharat name in connection with a G20 gathering, speculating on a possible name change for the country.
Love you bro. from pakistan ❤️
Vo gatar mein hai unhe gyan dena ka koi matlab nhi
The Bharata tribe existed in modern Pakistan anyway.
Bharata tribe was Vedic. The Rigvedic culture formed in Punjab. Most of Punjab is in Pakistan. Your country is named after a river in Pakistan (the Indus). It's best you stick to remembering you are an inheritor of the British Raj, and that's it.
River indus ka originate kaha se karti hai...😂??
brother you can be proud on buddhism which is originated from patna but a guy from patna cannot be proud on its own culture and history just because some muslim elite from UP want to remain in power and create their own nation just by drawing a random line on map. 🙏
Exactly ..he can be proud of the fact that buddhism sort of spread from that area(a religion that has nothing to do with present day pakistan ) to far east and west but a person from Patna should not be proud of his cultural and religious histroy that has roots in Peshawar even though he follows that religion in everyday life
hypocrisy of pakistanis
@@sonamkumari-od9nv Biharis have as much similarities to Pakistanis as Pakistanis have to Arab Muslims. Stop making us your fathers. Celebrate your sex temples.
a guy from patna cant be proud of the culture of japan ( that isnt associated with buddhism
@@ahmedajd164 yes ofcourse ...because there is no relation bw patna and Japan😂...but a Buddhist can be proud of its presence in Japan ...thats how it works...
Hope it helps!!
Thanks jinnah for making pakistan 😊.
It's really nice if you're rich and sunni muslim Panjabi. Sucks for the rest of us! 😂
@@ProudMurtad he is Indian 🙄
No problem Indus=Pakistan
@@Pakistan-_-388 nope...
@@Pakistan-_-388 😂are u Hindu then? Coz indus PPL worshipped Hindu gods like Laxmi pashupati Shakti ?
The way he explained that conversion to Islam was peaceful and gradual is a suspect.
We have many monuments desecrated whether they are Hindu Buddhist,Jain or universities palaces, forts.
A tale of destruction followed since the advent of Islam.
He talks about sun temple in Multan but doesn't speak that it was destroyed by Muslims along with so many other rich heritage sites in your part of the india sub continent.
All in all that part of history is explained much to smoothly to my liking.
Suspect
Hindus too destroyed Hindu places. Religion didnt inspire destruction,but the lust for power did.
Let's take a step back and remember why we're all here. We clicked on this video to learn something new, to gain insights, and maybe even broaden our horizons a bit.
But instead of diving into something meaningful, we seem to be stuck in a loop of arguments that might never reach a satisfying conclusion. Let's be real, none of us came here to watch a weird TV show, right?
We're all sensible folks, and we know that getting into heated debates over something as ambiguous as the ownership of the Indus Valley civilization won't get us anywhere. It's like trying to solve a puzzle with missing pieces.
So, how about we put our energy into something more productive? Like sharing our perspectives, listening to each other, and maybe even finding some common ground along the way.
And hey, while we're at it, let's not forget to treat each other with respect. We're all here to learn and grow, and that's a lot easier to do when we're not at each other's throats.
Let's make this discussion a space where we can all come away with something valuable, whether it's a new idea, a different perspective, or just a better understanding of each other.
Sound good? Let's dive back in with that in mind.
Your point is pretty fair. But it is the sheer hypocrisy of these people where they try to portray themselves as an “Islamic country” and conjure hatred for us. And then they’re off to claim a pre-Islamic Indian civilisation all for themselves. It does not make sense.
With respect 🙏 Mr Ahmed, if Gangadeshis USURP our immense 9000 yr old urbanised history then I for one will call them out.Regard!
@@rizwanhussain645 “Our 9000 years” of history…. Bro, you should try stand up comedy.
@@AmeyVikram16 Mehrgarh!
@@rizwanhussain645 Dholavira, Rangpur, Lothal, Alamgirpur.
Bro, the civilisation was that of Indus, and Indus was an India valley. Just because the Pakistani government managed to get a land in the place where many Harappan cities exist doesn’t make them Pakistani.
Sudan has more pyramids than Egypt, but still those pyramids are recognised as Egyptian remnants. So Stop being delusional. Get real.
Btw, your grandparents were likely “Gangudeshis” as well, since it was all India before 1947
12:53 exactly
In "rig veda Mandal 1 sukta 35 sloke 8" supt Sindhu word has used which means 7 rivers or 7 tributaries of Sindhu rivers. Now the point is how they came to word India on that region, in old Persian language( Zoroastrians-parsi ) the Persian used to pronounce word Sindhu as Hindu cause they didn't know how to pronounce later S that's why they called supt Sindhu as hupt Hindu they were not mentioned the river here but the all that geographic region only which were basin of Sindhu river and it's 1200BC old written in their holy book "Zend avesta" or "Zen daschta"
Dear Junaidbhai Greetings from Mumbai. Interesting conversation with young history buff. Guest expressed his opinions on varied topics / eras and also admitting at times that he is not sure of authenticity of what he was narrating. He comes comes out as honest , sincere lad , trying to learn. Few general comments :
1. Pakistanis surely has misconception of their identity , which isnt surprising. As Pakistan was born out of political case presented by Jinnah the lawyer , rather than a grass root politician. In any society the identity can be fluid...at local level one may be Pasthun or Sindhi ...at other level...may be Muslim ...at other level could be Pakistani or even South Asian .
2. Jinnah andMuslim League never fought for freedom of India or Pakistan from British rule . They always attacked Congress leaders and termed them into some Hindu leaders , which is falsely taught and understood by majority of Pakistanis.
3. Modern "Pakistani" History is very old , may be even older than Mohenjo Daro era . Pakistani students and people are main losers when they are taught incomplete or motivated history ..which leads to confusion of their national identity. Even the guest conveniently forgotten to state that great Emperors like Chandra gupta maurya, Ashoka the great etc were all from the land , which is modern day Pakistan. Such selective cherry pickings is prevalent in most of Pakistanis , hence they remain rudderless.
4. If the "Real / Honest" History of today/s Pakistani land is told to the children of Pakistan...new Pakistan will emerge . Till then, confusion shall continue. People need to read books written by credible Historians , Anthropologists etc rather than go by hearsay / anecdotes / sweeping generalisations/ conspiracy theories , unscientific ideas etc.
Keep up the good work JunaidBhai to awaken the people to challenge the false narrative being churned out by propagandists.
I completely agree with your sentiments sanjay, It's nice to see an indian for once not alienating us and saying our history doesn't belong to us
@@A.R.V_02 one should go after truth rather than worry about what others say.
Origins of chandragupta are not well attested very interesting to note he always spoke about low caste of padma nand
@@A.R.V_02 No my friend. The subcontinent has a shared history. And we are the same people. The only people who alienate you from your roots are your own citizens and politicians.
@@AmeyVikram16 I am sorry to inform you my friend, we are not the same, like I said north indians are the closest to us Pakistanis and that's it, Bharat follows a reformed shape of hinduism that was made years after the original vedic scriptures which was made in our land, those scriptures were reformed in the 5th century in heartlands of ganga and jamuna, I respect your culture and the ancient, rich history of both ganga and jamuna and I claim none of it and give credits to the people that live there, That is literally all that us Pakistanis ask, please stop claiming our history and lands, your opinion about our government alienating us is although very true, but I am glad many people are waking up, a whole historical renaissance is taking place in Pakistan right as we speak, people like huztory and thousands of others are spreading the light, soon my generation will then be able to teach the generation of our children, our whole history that was unfortunately defied by the generation that came immediately after independence who were too emotional religiously since they saw the oppression and slaughter by the disbelievers onto them
52% muslims in Punjab & 51% of Bengal. But this Lallu Historian wanted whole Punjab & Bengal. 2:13:30
Only thing which connects subcontinent is " Hinduism "..this guy is trying hard to project separate pakistani identity before partition..but al mashudi too has written sun temple in Multan..bhai koi alag culture nai h tumhara..
Their whole nation is based on the fact of proving a different identity somehow. Anyway, I have no hate in my mind. But I seriously hope that people accept their true history and roots.
Your Santana dharma has nothing to do with us, our ancestors followed vedic religion which opposed idol worship, There's a reason why there are more Buddhist stupas in Pakistan than Hindu temples
1947 Pakistan
2047 Khalistan Nagaland Kashmir Tamil 🐷🇮🇳🐷
@@bojpuri423 Pakistan ki tension le bail buddhi. Humara jane de. Balochistan alg roo rha hai. POJK aazadi mang rha hai, election tum karwa paa nahi reh ho, army chal nhi paa rhi...unka kbhi fuel khtm ho jata hai kbhi himmat, industries aane ke jagah jaa rahi hai, log khane bina mar rahe h, 1-1 billion dusro se mang pad rahe h. Aur tu yaha ye bakchodi kar rha h. Dimaag h ya inbreeding k karan khtam ho gaya hai vo bhi?
@@bojpuri4231947: Pakistan zindabad
2024: Pakistan se Zinda bhaag
2030:ek tha Pakistan
2040:kaun tha Pakistan 😢
People of indus valley civilization believed in idol worship, they used to worship trees, sun, earth and idols. If pakistanis are claiming indus valley civilization thay have to claims idol worshiping also, pakistanis have to claim pashupati/ lord shiva 😊
Pakistanis are so confused about their roots, sometimes they find their roots in arabs then turks.we hindus preserve that culture for thousands of years and now some bunch of converted pakistanis claiming that their😅
And this civilization could sustain for thousands of years because there was no islam that time😊
Pakistanis bhi wahi log Hain automatically history hamari hai religion matter nahi karta hamare pas apna independent mind hai Jo Chahy wo karenge
And ya real Indus=Pakistan not this sasti copy of Indus India 1947
@@Pakistan-_-388 if you can't except pashupati/shiva seal, idol worship, worship of trees,sun,soil which were the core of that civilization then you have no authority to say that you are the one who should represent that ?
All those above things that i have written are not about relegion but about the way of living, again I'm saying if you can't except pashupati/ idol worshiping which was an important part of that civilization then you don't have any authority to call that civilization urs.
In short your ancestors discarded that civilization and except a foreign concept of living. The real questions should be why did ur ancestors forgot about their real roots and except a foreign concept of living ?? May be they were afraid of Muslims.
@@Pakistan-_-388What does pakistan 🇵🇰 has of its own??
♦️ Names - Arabic
♦️Religion: Foreign invader's religion ☪️ , was forced by invaders & they sold their mothers to i☪️ invaders then converted
♦️Language: Urdu , its origin: UP 🇮🇳, & other languages like Sindhi Punjabi baloch etc are from sanskrit 🇮🇳
♦️Clothes, origin india 🇮🇳
♦️Food origin: india 🇮🇳 mainly Uttar Pradesh's cuisine
♦️History: India's 🇮🇳
♦️Indus valley: indus ppl worshipping Hindu gods like Pashupati, ivc majority part is in 🇮🇳not 🇵🇰
♦️Sindu river: origin 🇮🇳
😂whats pakistani🇵🇰 ????
Check origin of everything in your daily life , at least on Google. It will always say 🇮🇳
@@NativeBharatiye Indus river china se aati hai endia se nahi jahil
2:00:02 spot onnnnnnnnnnnn this mixing of culture was in sindh because it was all over india till 1947 !!!! It still continues in india but has stopped in paskistan !!!!!
you are from sindh?how can you judge thora tafseel dein aj ya to ap ki soch change ho ya meri
Real owner of this Indus Pakistan sindh Punjab Kashmir
@@HeliosKapiro you don't need to be from Europe to knoe what is happening in Europe. The point is about hindu hate that is taught in pakistani textbooks while textbooks in india teach communal harmony and brotherhood of mankind. Religion is not even taught. This feeling of brotherhood was prevalent in pakistan as well till 1947 but post independence, pakistan leadership including maulvis and leaders like zia ul haq have preached hatred for the hindus to the extent that minorities in pakistan have dropped from 17 percent in 1947 to less than 2 percent today. In india minorities have flourished and have increased both in percentage and number that theybare leaders of our country today. That's y u don't see any minorities around u because they have been converted or killed by an islamized radicalized society. Your media also cannot speak against the army because they will be abducted whereas india is a free liberal society where u can criticize anything and anyone. The recent killing of Christians and the rigged elections in pakistan are proof of what pak is and where it is heading. You may not like it but these are hard facts. All 4 wars against india have been initiated by pak and then lost by pak. Despite that, india hate and hindu hate is preached. Kashmir is a contentious issue but doesn't justify 4 wars and cross border terrorism killing millions of kashmiris on the india side. Till you don't educate children in pakistan, nothing will change.
india didnt exist before 1947 as a country
He is way younger than you but loved the fact that he’s more mature in his thinking about why we are the way we are instead of focussing on the fact k jese hain hum wese he rahein ge.
Huzaifa is an extremely well read gem of a person. I am so happy you invited him to your podcast.
He is far, far ahead of his years, a true positive asset of Pakistan.
what a joke
@@priyanshukumar7697 Ok Sanjay Dickshit is well read, the one who claims Saraswati Saxenas are responsible for the birth of the Anglo-Saxons.Regards Mrs Priya
@@gangadeshmatakimaut4739 dude I'm not here representing anyone I only meant that the guy is factually incorrect and is just tryna make a intellectual image of himself . He wants to represent Pakistan's ancient accomplishment but the very Pakistan wasnt present then ,it was the history of India and it still is .Pakistan is a recent creation the only history it has is after the partition that's all.
@@priyanshukumar7697 He is referring to coterminous Pakistan not your "Rep of India" ( a day younger than Pakistan), as for Sindhu & its many cognates, Scylax was clear about it's geographical makeup, it was strictly folk residing ALONG the might Sindhu (ancient Pakistanis) not those an 1000miles East.Regards Ganga dweller
We have leant all this in Indian history textbooks, from Harappa to taxila to Sushruta and panini.
It's not Taxilla it's takshshila
@@itzbeleiversame place, difference languages so pronunciation changes .
Why are you learning our history for?
Today he is cutting down the history to his region of India to give Pakistanis an identity, a few years he will have to cut ✂️ history to punjab only because nothing else will be left of them.😊
❤ from the holy birth land of the great emperor Bharata.
They want to mention everything even Buddhist, Jews but not Hinduism lol 😂 …This guy knows the truth but still pushing back lol.. guys who converted 300-400 yrs ago (aka talwar k zor pe salwar) are explaining us our history 😂
Also they criticizing everyone including British but not Islamic invasions and burning of taxalia university and demolishing others temples and recent Buddhists stupas by islamists!
Trueee
Absofuckinglutely. Itne dishonest log hain. The hatred is so deep rooted they don't even realise people outside Pakistan can still sense it. Not our fault that these guys have been stripped down of all past and been indoctrinated with hindu hate.
Don't you indians feel insulted that you guys are imposing your history on a different nation and the people of that nation curse your Gods but still you beg them to recognise your history as theirs 😂😂
Buddhism became the predominant faith in Gandhara when Kanishka embraced it and became its patron. Subsequently, the Budhism spread from Gandhara all the way to Korea and Japan.
Hinduism destroyed Buddist and Jain temple
Tamilians spread it in South East. Stop fabricating facts.
u guys have nothing to do with iindia or indus valley civilization or kanishka u guys are nothing but iinvaders go worship ur aarrabic god & aarrabic rreligio. iindians have their own religion, culture, and festival.
I find it hard to resist comparing this proud Pashtun/Chitrali with several shallow and self-loathing Punjabi “intellectuals” whose only mission is to ridicule their own people at every forum and every opportunity.
Many Polytheist nations of South Asia who are now trying to unite themselves under the term of Hindus have massacred Buddhists.
Bhai sahab Buddhism is derived from Hinduism vedic knowledge dear
budhism is another school of dharmic thought.
@@urrasscal8380 Go and study
And lindusim khud hamare Sindh se aya hai 😂 oldest civilization Indus 🇵🇰
@@Pakistan-_-388 Abe ghanta sheikh, Tera landislam, to aatankwadio se aaya hai...Haram ka
@@Pakistan-_-388 Abe ghanta sheikh, Tera landislam, to aatankwadio se aaya hai...Haram ka
If you are crazy enough to make 3 hour podcast then I am also crazy enough to watch this 3 hour podcast wonderful work man
Ancient name of Peshawar was Purushpur 🎉
Peshawar sounds better glad they changed it
But here the people of Peshawar don't call it Peshawar@@slowknife2873
@@slowknife2873 Change it to Pishitown!
@@slowknife2873 peshwar word came from Maratha 🕉️ peshwas !
Purushpur also represents purusharth which beautiful lived & taught by peshwas
@@slowknife2873 language spoken during then wouldve been slightly different too.
This online HISTORIAN still believes in the REJECTED ARYAN INVASION THEORY. Now we know which authors is he reading. 😅
When he said about Aryan invasion theory......time lapse pls
Of course you gangadeshi's have a problem with Aryan theory considering it makes y'all look like bunch of nobody pagans who got ran through by the vedic Aryans
Aryan migration theory, and there isn't compelling evidence of out of India theory 😂
We should believe in "out of India" theory instead because gangus Waz kangs and shiiiitee
He is not an online historian he is a half baked historian who want to introduce and push forward his stupid narrative in the market.
Fantastic podcast! An exploration of ancient civilizations and mysteries, focusing on Pakistan's legacy, is a winning combination. I hope there will be more episodes to explore other interesting aspects of our past.
No pakistan was termed after 1930s and indian subcontinent existed around 2500 bc
@@ganeshnaik9463 🐄🐮🐇👌🏻❤️😊🤲🙏
Pakistan should realize and bring up people like Huzaifa himself. These people are the ones who represent Pakistan, not us. Kudos to him.
Thank you Junaid for bringing knowledgeable guests like Huzaifa . Pata hi nhi chala 3 ghanto ka , appreciation from India .
Pakistan has large population of Sindhi and Punjabi speaking people but most the Sindhis in Pakistan can't read or write Sindhi (Khudabadi Script) and Punjabis don't know Punjabi (Gurmukhi) script.
Shukar hai mai in dono mai sai nahi ho 💪💪💪💪or maire aik hazar generations mai sai koi indian nahi hai na baap ki generation mai say na maa ki phir bhi is waqt mai Pakistani 🇵🇰 ho
@@UmairKhan-ht4ku Bhai proud moment hai tere liye bhai. Matlab tu kisi acche desh paranth ka hoga par tere hi purwajo ke karmo ne tje shithole P0rkistan me daal diya. Warna Arab ya Iran me hota. Kya hi baat hoti thi.
The Shahmukhi script is older than Gurumukhi and we use that, try again.
@@UmairKhan-ht4kuHazarywal ✌️
Jo bhi ho lekin history land to phr bhi hamari hai real owners of this subcontinent Indus=Pakistan
There is no evidence that shunga dynasty against Buddhism. But hunduism was their state religion.
very well done Huzaifa. I am sure many people leant alot. We are neither Arabs, nor Indians, we are ourselves.
مجھے پہلے سے معلوم تھا کہ ہم پاکستانی بھارتی نہیں ہیں بلکہ ہم تہذیبِ وادی سندھ کے باشندے ہیں جس کا بھارتیوں سے کوئی تعلق نہیں۔
@@talaltariqq_😂😂😂I can see your frustration
@@talaltariqq_😂 pakistanis and their toxicity towards indians. 😂 indians are definitely not pakistani, our history is not shit like urs , we didnt do stuff like 1971 or giving shelter to terrorism
@@talaltariqq_ Comforting yourself. IVC people migrated to Indian subcontinent down below. Fake claims.
Not even turks?
India is, the cradle of the human race, the birthplace of human speech, the mother of history, the grandmother of legend, and the great grand mother of tradition.
- Mark Twain
inko yeh pata nahi hoga ki mark twain kaun hai
@@72087hj they don't know about Mark Twain. They know about osama bin Laden, Dawood Ibrahim, ghaznavi, ghori, babur, taimur, aurangjeb etc
@@72087hj Hurr Durrr Tunni always triggered. Get lost 😂
@@72087hj humko pata hy tumahari mata mark twain ky pas niyog krny ati thi
@@ProudMurtadtunnis are only in India but madarsachaap andhnamazis are in 57 islamic countries. So there are more madarsachaap and andhnamazis than tunnis
Historian claims Islam didn't spread by sword
Also him giving example how islam spread by sword😂
Khalistan and Nagaland will get freedom
@@bojpuri423first free your gaza
@@bojpuri423 lahore banega khalistan
@@bojpuri423 Theek hai bhai woh ham handle kar lenge tum decide toh karlo tumhara PM kon hai
@@bojpuri423nagaland ko Christians se azadi milegi zarur, tension mat lo
The Vishnu Purana mentions:
ऋषभो मरुदेव्याश्च ऋषभात् भरतो भवेत्।भरताद् भारतं वर्षं, भरतात् सुमतिस्त्वभूत्॥Rishabha was born to Marudevi, Bharata was born to Rishabha,Bhāratavarṣa arose from Bharata and Sumati arose from Bharata.-Vishnu Purana (2,1,31)ततश्च भारतं वर्षमेतल्लोकेषुगीयते।भरताय यत: पित्रा दत्तं प्रतिष्ठिता वनम्॥ (विष्णु पुराण, २,१,३२)This country is known as Bhāratavarṣa since the times the father entrusted the kingdom to the son Bharata and he himself went to the forest for ascetic practices.[30]-Vishnu Purana (2,1,32)uttaraṃ yatsamudrasya himādreścaiva dakṣiṇam
varṣaṃ tadbhārataṃ nāma bhāratī yatra santatiḥउत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम्।वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र सन्ततिः॥"The country (varṣam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhārata; there dwell the descendants of Bharata.
it also says Vishnu Purana 2.12.36 “From the waters, which are the body of Vishnu, was produced the lotus shaped earth, with its seas and mountains.”💀😂
hey don't copy paste it is too long --- just write about bharat from himalaya mountain to the sea & give reference of VP with chapter and verse number.
@@user-yh1qd7lj5f
And according to Islam
Earth is flat 😅
In Islam -
No nation concept
Your Islam is only 1400 years old barbaric religion
@@urrasscal8380whats the historical evidance of that bs myth? stop living in delusional fairytale, how old is the oldest vishnu purana preserved till now with evidence?
@@user-yh1qd7lj5ffor that Quran gives perfect shape of earth that earth is flate and we created mountain so that people don't fall😅😅😂😂
Amazing discussion, the guy is not one of those pseudo intellectuals who are allergic to islamic connection. It was captivating MashaAllah
Bhai who is this guy? Where were you earlier? He should be featured more! MashaAllah!
He is the best
To claim ownership of one's history, one must show reverence for it. I oppose his view on the voluntary adoption of Islam in the Indian subcontinent. The majority were either coerced into conversion or did so for personal gain. It's challenging for Muslims in the subcontinent to acknowledge that their forebears were adherents of Hinduism or Buddhism.
Acha bhai we were coerced. Ab kia chahty ho ab to tum coerce ker rhy ho hamien change kerny k liye. Bhai dekh filhaal hamien islam appeal kerta hay tm apni zindagi jiyo or apny kam sa kam rkho. Ok?
I think present day muslims who were "coerced into conversion" also have Internet access and can read yet they are still choosing to be muslims even after all these years so what's your problem??
Im soo happy my ancestors accepted islam that's all that matters. Stop this forced to convert bs. Also side note when a non muslim accepts islam we don't call them "converts" but rather "reverts".
@@kankan5927 that's the thing. U guys got converted and now act as superior and try to convert others. Minorities har jahag mushkil mein hai but the fact is ki hindus kisi ko convert nhi karte na hi Esa koi concept hai but guys do .jis din tumlog Sach mein ye Maan loge ki tum forcefully ya for profit convert hue the maybe tab ye conversion band kar doge..again my comment is not Islam vs hindu. But it is for the followers of both the religion
@@kankan5927 so stop oppressing the already endangered hindu population in Pakistan and Bangladesh
@@pasttimequotes69 Apni marzi so convert kar saktay hain logo ko?
India name was given by Nehru????? Before Hindustan it was called Bharat. And it still is Bharat.
Bhai ye khote log h , ab ye bolenge East india company ka name bhi Nehru ne diya tha 😂.yeji yahan gyan prapt raha h or to high school level ka h wo bhi isne propaganda wala use kiya h . 😂
Gobarbhakt anpadh
@@AmitSangwan123 Abe jahil Hindustan khud Sindh se nikla hai apne😂 India ho ya Hindustan hame hi belong krta hai Indus=Pakistan
I watched this in parts, thank you for uploading the whole podcast. The best 3 hours I have spent
A twenty year old saying so many old names in itself is amazing 😂😂. We in twenties had issues remembering Newton and Einstein 😢😢
Bhai abhi Pakistan me forced conversion hote hai jb modern world hai per mediaeval time me forced conversion nhi hua hoga, waah bhai😂.
Unhe pata hai, darte hai sach bolne se
Forced conversion toh tera gangadesh mein bhi ho rahe hai gharwapsi k Naam pe, 2008 kandhamal christian massacre hua tab hazaaro christians ko forcefully convert Kiya tha dinduo ne, history ki toh baat karo he Mat, pata nahi Kitne Buddhists ko maara or convert kiya Hoga Tum logo ne
@@rahulramola934 Tu bhi Sach bol na, Kitne Buddhists stupas tod k mandir banaye unpe?
@@slowknife2873 proof dega ya yu hi baketi karta rhega..
@@slowknife2873 matlab oopar likhi baat sach hai 🤔🤔
They adopted the name India in 1947? 😅. Where the hell did Britain east India company come to? Why were the indigenous people of north American continent called "indians" by Columbus? What is this guy trying to prove? 😅
And India Naam hame belong krta hai Jo tume chura lia sasti copy of Indus India 1947😂 real hind real Indus=Pakistan and btw India jaisa Kuch nahi ye Naam British ki wajah se aya real word to Hindustan aur Indus hi hai
@@Pakistan-_-388 : indus is Sindhu. People living on the banks of sindhu are hindhu. So are you hindhu? 😁
@@msdolly6101981 Sindh se hind nikla hai hind se Sindh nhi aur religion matter nahi karta land to hamari thi hai aur rahegi oldest civilization Indus🇵🇰💪
@@Pakistan-_-388 : I asked what are the people called. Didn't say about the land 😃
@@msdolly6101981 people? Insaan aur kia janwar?
Great to see huzaifa here on thie podcast
Following him on twitter since 2020
Amazing historian
Same.
Love the depth of this podcast from Chitral.
The name Bharat is very old it's written in our religious text which is 6000 old
Khalistan Jindabad
Sorry sir what 6000 years old ???? Which book??
@@zainsepticeye upanishad. BTW 8000 yr temple found in saudi(verify it on google) and islam came in 1400.(stop blsshit claims of adam eve come to archelogical evidences, show a single proof of islam before 1400, just sanchi stupa is older than islam 8tself 😂😂😂)
@@gagaq-xd7cj Sindudesh zindabad, BLA zindabad, pakhtoonistan zindabad.
@@zainsepticeye In our ved bharat name was mentioned.
Bhai aap history sahi nahi padh paye aapki galati nahi, Kushans aar actually Generations of Raja kush ,one of the Son of Sri Ram.So Hindukush mountains ranges are also in the name of King Kush..Aapne pada hain, kam se kam history but agar aap India se padhte aapko aur sahi content milta..
Bro singlehandedly triggered the ENTIRE community of our obsessed neighbors, hats off 🥳🙌
who give a fuck about fake historian he doesnt even have credintials of being a historian, as a historian these wild claims doesnt have any value in the community history and historians
It’s other way around! Pakistanis think they are Arabs because Islam and suddenly they claim Hindu heritage
You both are right that that land belongs to you but that equally belongs to people who had to leave in partition . My ancestors moved from Jhang district to Jalandhar district . It happened on the both sides but the cause of this happened is religion which originally doesn’t belong to this land 😊
The rational mind and Pakistani mind are like chalk and cheese . This self proclaimed dentist expert on south Asian history has highly biased views with hue of his mazab and Jinnah ..
However, we should thank British agent Jinnah for separating medievals from civilised and taking the former to his new created Lala land …
Yeah yeah sure now stop obsessing
"Civilised" hahahahaha
Indus=Pakistan real owners 🇵🇰💪
The only sad part is our dumb leaders ( nehru and gandhi ) didn't allow a full population exchange. That would have ended all our problems today.
South asian nhi indian subcontinent
lots of love for Huzaifa, saw his work on Pakistani indigenous groups, history, art, music and many more other things.
So happy to his podcast.
I couldnt skip single second of this PODCAST
This is what we need to have from the podcast, Worth Watching. Thanks, both of you.
Iam an Arab in UAE
who has interacted with Pakistanis and Indians for the past decade. I more or less understand the language Hindi / Urdu which are very similar...
Arabs conquered the Afghans and iranians and converted them to Islam. Arabs also conquered Sindh and thus conversion to Islam began.
Pakistanis and Indian Muslims whose ancestors were undeniably Hindu/ Buddhist like to call themselves Arabs/ Turks is because they don't want to accept that their Ancestors were Defeated. It brings a sense of Inferiority Complex to them...
Also, Babar who started Mughal empire was an Uzbek ( Central Asian). Muslims of India ( including Pakistan) were governed by foreigner Muslims 99.9% of the time...
urdu is only the national language of pakistan as a lingua franca to unite us all, that doesnt mean we are same with indians. we pakistanis first speak our mother tongue panjabi, sindhi, pashto, balochi, kashmiri only found in pakistan not in india except the panjabis of india but theyre a minority in india.
pakistani ancestors before islam was buddhist, zoroastrain and pagans , no one in pakistan calls themselves turks or arabs. we dont have an !nf3r!0rity complex we are all proud of our ethnicities different from indians lol .
we pakistanis arent indian muslims we share one ethnicitiy wit india the panjabis and theyre a minority in india and genetically different from other indians. we pakistanis were converted by arabs in the 8th century and sufi preachers in the 11th century . may god guide us all
@@user-fw5gp2me9b 🤭🤭🤭🤭
Burak is not an Arab name 😂😂
@@user-fw5gp2me9b ghazni, ghori and aurangzeb were sufi preachers 😂😂😂
@@saumyashah4831 lol ghori and aurangzeb dididn't convert us it was the Arab, Persian Sufi and turks way before ghori aurangzerb. Ghazni was a turk
Huzaifa is a gem 💯 Great work!
Indeed. Pakistan needs more of these
Me Siddiqui hu cast sy hmary yha bhi arabs wali kahani aam hai 😂😂🙂 hmary bhi bary phary phar kr aye thy or unka shajira bhi bana rakha hai hmari family ny but i am proud sindhi because me es land sy belong krta hu sindh me ziada tar casts unky profession expertise ya kisi skill ki buniyad par huti hai kesy Fisher mans mallah ya mirani black simiths lohar gold smith, sonaro jab Balochistan sy migration huyi thi tab unho ny ju profession chose kia tha un jy hisab sy apni casts rakhi thi ya hu gayi thi jesy lohar baroch, and other casts with like these 😊
باہر سے آنے والے آپ لوگ بلوچ نہیں پتر پہلے تاریخ کا مطالعہ کرو پھر آپ ایسی جھوٹی کہانیوں سے نکل جاؤ گے
بلوچوں کی قدیم سلطنت اشکانیان آشکانی جسے پارتھین بھی کہا جاتا تھا جس کی زبان لباس روایات سب کچھ بلوچ رسم و رواج سے تھی اور زیادہ تر بادشاہوں کے نام بالاش تھے یعنی بالاچ ، خواتین بلوچی لباس پہنتی تھی اور مرد بھی بلوچی گیر والا شلوار پہنتے تھے،
اس آشکانی سلطنتِ کی سرحدیں موجودہ پاکستان عراق شام افغانستان ترکی آذربائیجان آرمینیا ہندوستان تک پھیلی ہوئی تھی، جس کی بنیاد 223 BC قبل مسیح میں رکھی گئی تھی جو 570 سالوں تک قائم رہی،
اس کے علاوہ بھی بہت ساری سلطنتیں تھی ، کوشش کرو قدیم تاریخی کتابوں کا مطالعہ کرو جو یونانی عرب ترک پارسی یہودی عیسائی مورخین نے لکھی ہیں پھر سمجھو گے
اور جہاں تک بات سندھ کی ہے تو لفظ سند اور لفظ مہران یہ دونوں بلوچی زبان کے لفظ ہیں، چاہو تو اس بارے میں تحقیقات کرو، اور سندھ کا ویسٹ بینک بلوچستان کا حصہ ہے دریا سندھ سے اس طرف سارا بلوچستان ہے، بلوچ شروع سے اپنی سرزمین پر رہے رہیں ہیں ہزاروں سالوں سے اور ابھی بھی جاکر دیکھو سندھ اکثریت بلوچوں کی ہے،
باہر سے آنے تم لوگ ہو بلوچ نہیں،
قدیم تاریخی کتابوں میں کسی سندھی قوم کا ذکر نہیں ہے صرف علاقے نام سندھ وہ بھی بلوچی زبان کا لفظ ہے سند بلوچی زبان حدود و باڈر یعنی توڑنا سو کہتے ہیں سندھی کے ویسٹ بینک کو تک کے علاقے کو بلوچوں نے سند کا نام دیا پھر یہاں سے یہ لفظ مشہور ہوگیا،
کسی نام نہاد سندھی سے پوچھو سندھ اور مہران کے معنی کیا دیکھنا وہ آئیں بائیں شائیں کرے گا غلط ہی بتاۓ گا،
سندھ تاریخ کا ایک ہی کتاب ہے چچ نامہ جس سندھ نامہ بنا دیا 😂 وہ کس نے لکھی آج تک اس کے مؤرخ کا پتہ نہیں علی کوفی بندے نے اس کا ترجمہ کیا ہے
جس راجہ چچ کو سندھی کہا جاتا ہے وہ اصل میں باہر سے آنا والا مہاجر تھا کشمیر سے آنے والا وہ سندھ کا باشندہ ہی نہیں تھا اصل میں وہ راۓ خاندان کا راجپوت تھا،
بلوچوں کے خلاف سازشیں انگریز سامراجوں کے آنے بعد شروع ہوئی کیونکہ بلوچوں نے سندھ کیلئے بیشمار قربانیاں دی ہیں انگریز کے خلاف لڑے ہیں چاۓ اندونی سندھ ہو یا کلاچی کراچی بلوچوں نے ہمیشہ انگیزیوں کے خلاف سخت مزاحمت کی ہے اسی طرح ہر مقام پہ بلوچوں نے انگریز کے خلاف شدید مزاحمت کی اس جنگ بلوچستان کا سربراہ خان آف قلات میر محراب خان احمد زئی بلوچ شہید ہوۓ اور اسی طرح سندھ میانی کی جنگ میں ایک ہی دن میں صرف 7000 ہزار بلوچ شہید ہوۓ مگر بلوچوں نے مزاحمت نے چھوڑی انگیز کو اسی بات کی جلن تھی دوسری طرف بلوچ کی اکثریت انگیز کی فوج میں کراۓ کے سپاہی بننے سے انکار کرتے تھے
پھر انگیزوں نے ٹھان لی کہ بلوچوں کے سبق سیکھایا جاۓ سب سے پہلے انگیزیوں نے بلوچستان کے ایک حصے کو 1893 میں افغانستان ڈال دیا پھر دوسرے حصے کو 1928 میں ایران میں ڈال دیا صرف بلوچوں کی طاقت کم کرنے کیلئے اس کے بعد بلوچستان کے بہت سارے علاقوں کو پنجاب میں ڈالا ، جس میں ، ڈیرہ غازی خان راجن پور تونسہ شریف رحم یار خان لیہ بکھر مظفر گڑھ صادق آباد ، پھر بہت سارے علاقوں کو سندھ میں شامل کردیا ، جس میں کلاچی کراچی جیکب آباد دادو قمبر شہداد کوٹ کشمور کند کوٹ شکار پور شامل تھے، ایک علاقہ NWF میں ڈالا ڈیرہ اسماعیل خان ،
پھر جب انگریز سامراجوں نے پوکستان کو تخلیق کیا تو انہوں نے سازشوں کے تحت بلوچستان کے آخری چار ریاستوں کو زبردستی پوکستان نے انگریز سامراجوں کے ساتھ ملکر 27 مارچ 1948 کے دن بلوچستان پہ جبری قبضہ کر لیا ، بلوچستان میں آج تک جبری قبضے کے خلاف جنگ آزادی جاری ہے
تاریخ بہت لمبی ہے آپ سے درخواست ہے قدیم مستند تاریخی کتابوں کا مطالعہ کرو جو 18 سو 15 سو 12 سو 1 ہزار سال پہلے لکھی گئی تھی ،
آج کل خاص کر کچھ پنجابی سندھی پشتون سرائیکی بلوچوں کے خلاف سازشیں کر رہے ہیں غلط تاریخ کو بیان کیا جا رہا ہے،
ان کے مفادات بہت سارے ، سندھ کی اکثریت بلوچ، جنوبی پنجاب کی اکثریت بلوچ،
اور بلوچستان میں صرف ٥ ٪ علاقے ہیں پشتونوں کے ہو بھی افغان باڈر کے علاقے تک محدود ہیں،
بہت سارے مفادات ہیں بہت سارے مثال ہیں،
اور سب جانتے ہیں بلوچ کبھی اپنی سرزمین سے دستبردار نہیں ہونگے، چاۓ کراچی ہو یا اندونی سندھ کے علاقے یا جنوبی پنجاب کے علاقے ، یا افغانستان میں ڈالے گئے علاقے یا ایران میں ڈالے گئے علاقے ،
آخری بات یہ بروچ والا نظریہ کچھ پنجابی نسل کے لوگوں نے بعد میں پیش کیا کہ کس طرح بلوچوں کے تقسیم کیا جاۓ آج بھی سندھ کے بلوچوں کو بولا جاتا ہے تم بلوچ نہیں ہو بلکہ بروچ ہو 😂 مگر ان سازشی لوگوں کے تمام سازشیں ناکام و نامراد ہوۓ ہیں
بہت حد سے زیادہ بغض پایا جاتا ہے،
آج کل کچھ مہاجر پناہ گزین بھی ان کے ساتھ ملکر بلوچوں کے خلاف سازشیں کر رہے ہیں،
سندھی بولنے زیادہ تر آپ راجپوت ملے یا پنجابی ہے بہت بڑا مزاق جاری ہے جس کو دیکھو خود کو سندھی بنا رہا ہے، خود گالی دے رہا ہے تاریخ میں سندھی نام کی کوئی قومیت نہیں ہے ،
محمد ﷺ کی ایک حدیث مبارک ہے کہ جس نے اپنی قوم بدلی اس نے اپنے باپ سے انکار کیا جو سخت عزاب کا شکار ہوگا ، کچھ اس طرح کی حدیث مبارک ہے الللہ پاک کمی پیشی معاف کرے
When you are talking about history there are 2 problems with that argument
1. You forget the people who u threw out on the name of islam are the original inhabitants of these cultures like hindu sindhis, kashmiri pandits because they were carrying the legacy and traditions of these cultures. Without following the culture and its customs you want a part of it now as it makes money for you.
2. The day your ancestors converted to islam you detached yourself from the lineage of this culture you are trying to claim now. you are now what is called adha tittar aadha bter. You cannot have it both ways. So you have to leave one of them and choose what you are.
Indians on the other hand are still carrying those original traditions and customs that originated in these civilizations and are preserving it from millennia in face foreign terrorists for 1000 years and have sacrificed so much to safeguard it.
British people came in search of India and landed in eastern side, vasco d gama came in search of India and landed in kerala, that shows what india was for Greece people, you better learn some history first.
LMFAOOO the greeks made the word indos when conquering pakistan from sindos , the british COINED THE WORD for the whole subcontinent the word india was known as a GEOGRAPHICAL location not a country. you better learn some history first.
@@user-fw5gp2me9b European were searching for india for spice trade cos india were biggest spice producer, they traded spices for years from kerala, I mean you can claim that you are india or turk or arab keep claiming no one cares 🤣🤣🤣
What an absolute gem of a video. This should be shown in every single history and culture classroom in Pakistan. The government should officially patronise and spread all this information. There is far too much knowledge, nuance and vocabulary thats so crucial to understanding the whole conversation and context around Pakistani history, and how it unfortunately gets lost and unclaimed, instead claimed by our neighbours. I hope this video, and every single post and article by Huzaifa never ever gets lost and remains on the internet forever. I hope it gets published in books and media programmes throughout the country. Pakistan needs some serious work done on recognising and being proud of all this. Instead we accept a very defeatist and self-loathing attitude, often stemming from current political/economical frustrations, which is unfair to do.
Yup the real owner of this history and subcontinent Pakistan Indus=Pakistan
@@Pakistan-_-388There was india, indica, Al hind, hindustan throughout history. There was never a Pakistan as even the concept of Pakistan never existed before 1930s.
Even the present Pakistani territories were seen as hindustan only.
@@mukundmathers aur wo indica hamare Indus ko dia gya tha Greeks ne 😂 aur Tum is British ke diye huye India ko usse link de rahe ho Sirf Naam adopt Karne se ban jaoge Malik?
@@mukundmathers India bhi yahi generate hua Hindustan bhi aur hum real word use karte hai hind India nahi India kabhi bhi accept nhi kia humne na hi kabhi official Naam tha Tumne to bas Naam churaya hai and Pakistan is Indus valley real Hindustan dot.
@@Pakistan-_-388 1. Indus flows through India also.
2. India or hindustan was land beyond the indus stretching till bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean.
3. So you agree Pakistan is hindustan only?
Thank you Junaid, this was one of the best your channel has produced. Kuddos to this genius.
Mashallah! He is so well read and articulate !
Being an Indian, I used to think that there would be some logical and knowledgeable people in Pakistan who would have been isolated, but now I am able to understand that those whom Pakistani people consider as so-called intellectuals are nothing but Wikipedians with half-baked knowledge and Conspiracy theory believers and they are imaginary intellectuals who live in an imaginary world of their own. Finding intellectuals in Pakistan is like finding a pearl in the desert which will never be found.
if you’re brave enough to call someone a conspiracy theorist or a fake intellectual than why don’t you show us your level of education by countering our facts? oh you can’t! because your brain is filled with nothing more than RSS propaganda 😂😂
Before the Islamization of the northwestern frontier of the subcontinent, the people and cultures in that region shared a common history, as evidenced by references to Gandhara in the Mahabharata. While the current demographic differences between nations may be significant, it is essential to acknowledge the deep-rooted similarities in the ancient history of the subcontinent. Regardless of the labels used, it is widely recognized that the region once boasted a rich and prestigious ancient civilization predating any Abrahamic religion. Therefore, it is fair to assert that this civilization was not inherently tied to Abrahamic ideologies.
lastly Kudos to Huzaifa for bringing and taking a pride in his own culture. All the best, Brother for your pursuit. Love and respect from India.
He is not taking pride in Indian culture. He is dropping subtle hints again and again. He is a Muslim supermacist. He is saying that all the intellectual property produced by the ancient people of North Western Bharat is of today's Pakistan. Why we Indians are so naive. And can't see hatred eyes for us in their eyes.
He's a religiously motivated person... he's presenting ancient history from the lenses of islam...
Indus=PAKISTAN India also belongs to us👌
@@Pakistan-_-388lol delusional
@@Vk-sk7nm
I dont agree with you. The thing is that even in India if you go to south people regardless of religion take pride in their history.
But in north india ethnicity is not valued as much as religion.
People of punjab and sindh should take pride in their past regardless of their religion.
Agreed with Huzaifa. Before hundreds of years if today's Pakistan doesn't existed than similarly modern day "Bharat" also wasn't there. This region was divided and ruled by multiple Kingdoms. It were the Mughals & the Britishers who united these two different regions of Indus valley (where modern day Pakistan is situated) and Gangetic - Yamuna plains (where modern day Bharat exist).
Madarsachaap Indias real name is Bharat which is 10000 years civilization. Pakistan was born on 1947 . Pakistan was a part of India. Pakistan exist because of India
Madarsachaap Indias real name is Bharat which is 10000 years civilization. Pakistan was born on 1947 . Pakistan was a part of India. Pakistan exist because of India
Bharat is a 10,000 years cívilisationa before your Islam was invented 1400 years ago 😊
Read about the Mauryan Empire.
You don't know about bharatvarsha 😂
India me Class 9 se ancient India studies (history section of social science) me ye sab padhaya jata hai. This makes young Indians awar of his/her identity. It ensures that no amount of crisis can uproot indian identity.
Is that why Mughal History is now removed from your History curriculum?
@@zsa2000kisne bol nhi h . Every history book mention them abe repetitive ho gya issiliye syallabus kaam kiya . Jaise 9 th mein padha toh 11th mein bhi wahi padna h . Issiliye kaam kiya remove nhi kiya .
@@zsa2000: we will never them. That's a reminder of what shouldn't happen again 😅
Its already done. You can't control what happens. @@msdolly6101981
@@zsa2000mugal Abe Chu unlog ka origin Uzbekistan se hai Pakistan ko bhi nai oadhama chiye 😂😂😂
32:49 there is a book named BRIHATKATHAKOSHA written by gunadaya during gupta age , majority of its stories were similar to 101 arabian nights , and one of the story of sindbad was also mentioned in that book. Majority of historians believed that brihatkathakosha was the original text.
Nation state concept is very recent.. but this entire civilisation has been called as “India” even before Alexander….and even before that it was called “Bharat”
Except not an iota of evidence to back up your spurious claims of Bharat & Bharatvarsha...as for India then please refer to Scylax who mentioned it strictly as folk living along banks of mighty Sindhu(ancestors of Pakistanis) & not your Aghori Baba forefathers in the forests of the ancient Ganga Basin!Regards
@@rizwanhussain645Hindus existed for 10,000 years even before Islam was invented 1400 years ago
@arjunr5578 LOL, Hinduism in context of religion formalised in 1833, defined as any religious belief that's NOT Abrahamic, Sikh, Buddhist or Jain, bottomline so called Hinduism was defined by NOT WHAT IT WAS BUT RATHER BY WHAT IT WAS NOT...Let this sink in!
@@rizwanhussain645 says a guy who follows a arabic cult which rejects scientific evolutionary theory 😂
Sanskrit language is as old as 3,000 years even before your Islam was invented 😂
@@rizwanhussain645the word “Bharata” or “Bharata varsh” started during Rig Vedic period after Dasarajna war and further the boundaries are specified in one of the oldest puranas.. i.e Vishnu Purana…
Kalila wa dimna is based on Panchtantra by Vishnu Sharma.
When you invite a 20 year old boy as a historian in your podcast reflects your intellect level as a host of a pakistani podcast.
Pakistan for you👇:-
1. Converted Muslims from Hindus(Sanatani) by force.
2. Radicalised by a book.
3. Divided a piece of land from India over Islamic radical thoughts.
The history of religious conversion in the Indian subcontinent is complex and varied, and it cannot be generalized as a simple process of forced conversion to Islam. While there were instances of coercion and force used by rulers at certain times and in certain regions, it's important to recognize that religious conversion occurred through a combination of factors, including political, social, economic, and cultural influences.
Islam spread to the Indian subcontinent primarily through trade, migration, and the efforts of Sufi saints and missionaries who preached and propagated the faith peacefully. Many people converted to Islam voluntarily, attracted by its teachings, beliefs, and the opportunities it offered.
Additionally, the Indian subcontinent has a long history of religious pluralism, and communities of various faiths often coexisted and interacted with one another. While there were periods of religious conflict and tension, particularly during times of political upheaval and conquest, it's essential to acknowledge the diversity of experiences and perspectives within the region's history of religious conversion.
Learned more history here than all of Pak studies in school
There is a ashoka's house or rest place in kotli pakistan side jammukashmir basically it is made by cutting the whole mountain if u look it looks marvelous and sorry for bad english.❤
It's not south Asia it's Indian subcontinent 😅😅😅😅😅 because Afghanistan also included in South Asia but British not capture Afghanistan 😅😅😅😂😂
By calling it Indian much confusion arises because you jokers decided to name your fake nation after OUR historical river!
British were in Afghanistan not all but they were there.
India itself was a subcontinent their was no unified India never was ruled by same person it was divided way before it was cool
1:57:32 Moses Somake (6 June 1875 - 6 April 1947) was a British architect known for designing several prominent buildings in British India. His works, built before the Partition of British India and located in modern-day Pakistan, include the Edward House, BVS Parsi High School, Karachi Goan Association building, Khaliq Dina Hall, Mules Mansion and Quaid-e-Azam House.
All I see is ad hominem attacks from foreigners from the East, yet no rebuttal 😂shows how much of an MELTDOWN this prodigious young chap has caused to these Ganga dwellers 😂😂😂😂
he is narrating a another type of pak studies , if hindu politician were cunning then they would have expelled all muslim from india but muslim population in india exploded from 3 crore to 21 crore isnpite of voting of Pakistan and Bangladesh
@@shreeyanksinghvi7748 Murakh Muslims from the Ganga & Deccan are your responsibility!
@@rizwanhussain645 they voted for pakistan
@shreeyanksinghvi7748 And should have moved to natural proximity of E. Pakistan which incidentaly was imposed on Jinnah bottomline Gangetic Bengal was never part of Iqbals vision.Regards Gangadeshi