Telegram Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024

Комментарии • 466

  • @ricardillapujagut8073
    @ricardillapujagut8073 3 года назад +193

    For me, telegram's biggest feature is normie appeal. I have been able to migrate like 5-6 of my normie friends from whatsapp to telegram. I have been able to migrate 0 normie friends to signal.

    • @phitc4242
      @phitc4242 2 года назад +5

      but why does signal not appeal?

    • @ricardillapujagut8073
      @ricardillapujagut8073 2 года назад +23

      ​@@phitc4242 I'd say it's mostly network effect. Most of my normie friends won't even bother installing Signal because they don't have enough contacts using it.

    • @Mohanad_YT
      @Mohanad_YT 5 месяцев назад

      @@phitc4242 signal doesn't support chat backups on IOS which blocks its appeal for normies

  • @Calajese
    @Calajese 3 года назад +347

    "Has more stickers ... so it's gonna be popular with the Zoomers" Wow, I got completely called out, my zoomer brain prefers it because of the big ass stickers packs(The limit is 120 I think) and the "You don't actually need your phone to use the desktop app", shitposting without having to constantly babysit my phone so it doesn't disconnect me because it got idle for too long is probably the main reason I mainly use Telegram

    • @Enkirex
      @Enkirex 3 года назад +54

      @@kajacx WhatsApp do that lol

    • @Calajese
      @Calajese 3 года назад +16

      @@kajacx Yeah, the zucc owned one is the one I hate the most, I usually have to leave my phone with the screen unlocked and it opened in the foreground or it will complain about "Phone not connected to the network" even though if it would receive a message it would notify me about it with no problem

    • @test-cp8uz
      @test-cp8uz 3 года назад +2

      @@Calajese wow

    • @Calajese
      @Calajese 3 года назад +3

      @Nadeko I have 3 stickers of pepes, apus and spurdos that are at the limit, if I were to export them to zucczap it would be a nightmare

    • @amnottabs
      @amnottabs 3 года назад +4

      @@Calajese if they're not animated just send the stickerpack's link to @tgstowebpbot then extract the zip it sends you and use "Personal stickers for WhatsApp" to import them to the whatsucc all at once; enjoy sending rare pepes to normies

  • @user-ez3ei8cd5o
    @user-ez3ei8cd5o 3 года назад +313

    You talked about governments being able to block its traffic, but in fact, the Russian government tried for more than a year, failed eventually, and made temporarily unavailable quite a few innocent services in the process of blocking supposed telegram IPs. That is because it has a distributed server architecture, so they won't be screwed if one or 2 hosting providers kick them off or a government blocks some IP ranges or dns domains.

    • @rasulseidagul
      @rasulseidagul 3 года назад +24

      I suspect that Russian government failed because it is heavily corrupted(as its federal security service and all other ministries 😆😅) so nothing works as expected.

    • @rasulseidagul
      @rasulseidagul 3 года назад +6

      So, unfortunately, we cant take Russion gov blocking actions into account 😅 as representable example

    • @alivesalad4064
      @alivesalad4064 3 года назад +32

      @@rasulseidagul that is not the case. The reason why Russian government failed to ban Telegram is because telegram's architecture (as Yaroslav listed above)
      In 2020, Russian gov. unbanned Telegram

    • @vkngdota
      @vkngdota 3 года назад +3

      and now they allow telegram... supicious state of the art DPI

    • @behradh
      @behradh 3 года назад +3

      Yet it's completely blocked in Iran.

  • @SPYFFzero
    @SPYFFzero 3 года назад +221

    Unlike Signal, Telegram has native GNU/Linux desktop application, not some electron bloat.

    • @kvdrr
      @kvdrr 3 года назад +47

      Yeah, that's the main selling point for me. So tired of progressive web applications...

    • @igorthelight
      @igorthelight 3 года назад +22

      True.
      It's C++ with Qt Framework for Windows and for Linux.

    • @papiezguwniak
      @papiezguwniak 3 года назад +1

      Doesn't signal have Linux app? I installed signal on my Linux mint from their repository. I'm a Linux noob though so I don't know if it's native.

    • @SPYFFzero
      @SPYFFzero 3 года назад +23

      @@papiezguwniak Its not native. Like many applications, Signal wrapped its webapp with electron (basically a "lightweight" browser). Telegram is written in C++ which we call native because of it. It is much faster because you dont run a complete web-browser. Low CPU usage, and low memory usage.

    • @papiezguwniak
      @papiezguwniak 3 года назад +5

      @@SPYFFzero I see. Is it really that much of a problem with modern fast hardware? I mean when I check system resources, signal uses 0.1% of my CPU.

  • @Remls
    @Remls 3 года назад +132

    "Supergroups can have 5000 members" yet the group open towards the end of the video has 6k+?
    Edit: Apparently the member cap is actually 200k.

    • @Vysair
      @Vysair 3 года назад +4

      Custom rom groups and channel has a lot of user. Normally we have 10k - 20k on average.

    • @ivan_says_hi
      @ivan_says_hi 3 года назад +21

      I want groups of 2 billion members and above. If I can't Rick Roll half the planet then why even bother?

    • @nestorgomez7305
      @nestorgomez7305 3 года назад +3

      Yes, the cap is 200k it was changed almost a year ago. Before that, yes, it was 5k members.

  • @flexagonpark5467
    @flexagonpark5467 3 года назад +28

    Channels are the killer feature of Telegram. Only Telegram and Viber have that feature, and Viber is shit

    • @purplep3466
      @purplep3466 3 года назад +6

      Viber is made for post-soviet grannies :(

  • @Zekr0_
    @Zekr0_ 3 года назад +48

    You forgot to mention unlimited storage.
    You can send file of almost any size and any kind.
    Tho distribution of illegal content will get the channel banned

    • @floriegl
      @floriegl 3 года назад +11

      Just create an encrypted archive and distribute the key using another methode

    • @TheAechBomb
      @TheAechBomb 3 года назад +5

      any individual file up to 2GB, umlimited total filesize

    • @MrFram
      @MrFram 3 года назад +10

      @Kartoffelbrei second. Piracy is well-tolerated. People just straight up post entire movies and series in massive public channels/chats

  • @samuelmatheson9655
    @samuelmatheson9655 3 года назад +35

    How did people tolerate whatsapp and it only being able to be used on 1 device

    • @Elias-vs2dx
      @Elias-vs2dx 3 года назад

      I don't think it's that common for people to use multiple phones where as whatsapp Web and multiple computers works out just fine

    • @Elias-vs2dx
      @Elias-vs2dx 3 года назад +1

      @@AnonymousGentooman you can bring your messages from the cloud but losing your phone or breaking it that's a very special scenario that I don't think affects a ton of people. But if that's super important to you then sure. I first comment was about about that very day use and that most people don't have multiple phones they regularly use or least the people I know don't

    • @SirDella
      @SirDella 3 года назад

      @@Elias-vs2dx not very special here, south america

  • @fawzanfawzi9993
    @fawzanfawzi9993 3 года назад +86

    When I first heard this program's name, I immediately thought of the vintage Telegram from the early 20th century.

    • @Calajese
      @Calajese 3 года назад +32

      Would be cooler if the icon was a telegraph rather than a shitty paper plane

    • @sharoyveduchi
      @sharoyveduchi 3 года назад +18

      @@Calajese the hell with you. Paper plane is more playful and fun than an actual telegraph. Telegraph reminds me of when England was ruining the world.

    • @Calajese
      @Calajese 3 года назад +4

      @@sharoyveduchi Maybe a paper plane could be better, if they didn't decide to use the laziest paper plane that exists, you can't even make a more basic paper plane than that one

    • @adud6764
      @adud6764 3 года назад +4

      That's the point, isn't it?

    • @Omlet221
      @Omlet221 3 года назад +6

      Imagine if this video was literally him reviewing old fashion telegrams for talking to people? “One thing I don’t like about the telegram is you have to learn Morse code fist so there is a larger barrier to entry than usual”

  • @sugaryhull9688
    @sugaryhull9688 3 года назад +57

    Not a fan of the "roll your own" encryption and the proprietary, source-available nature of the app

    • @yoman9446
      @yoman9446 3 года назад

      MTProto 2.0 has now been audited.

  • @ootachi
    @ootachi 3 года назад +96

    I expected you'd smash it for the self-made encryption and not defaulting to E2EE, and yet...

    • @ykd0011
      @ykd0011 5 месяцев назад +1

      With e2ee people lose all their data when they switch phones and users hate that.

  • @heinerml2
    @heinerml2 3 года назад +72

    "What do you have to hide from facebook? why are you so afraid?"
    -Everyone I have to talk to and won't leave whatsapp.

    • @garonpawebo5189
      @garonpawebo5189 3 года назад +4

      Privacylets

    • @EldergodUK
      @EldergodUK 3 года назад +36

      Sounds familiar, but most people are built for NPC duty....it's their purpose to be in the majority.

    • @samalexander3295
      @samalexander3295 3 года назад +25

      Ask them why do they lock the doors when they take a shit. everybody shits.

    • @bruhintoshmoment3865
      @bruhintoshmoment3865 3 года назад +7

      @@samalexander3295 also ask them to install nest cameras in their bathrooms and toilets. If they respond with no then remind them that they said they have nothing to hide, after all.

    • @ADeeSHUPA
      @ADeeSHUPA 3 года назад +1

      @@bruhintoshmoment3865 uP

  • @anotherbasedpepe
    @anotherbasedpepe 3 года назад +70

    woah just got this reccomended

  • @xasmaniusvolk8416
    @xasmaniusvolk8416 3 года назад +8

    2:20 the ones that are remotely privacy-respecting don't want your phone number.

  • @jomei01
    @jomei01 3 года назад +17

    Russian government already try to block telegram, but they couldn't

    • @ke1daze
      @ke1daze 3 года назад

      @@veirant5004 (sry bad eng) never heard about this, i saw only about Roscomnadzor's director said something like "It was a mistake to try block it" and they gave up.

    • @misham6547
      @misham6547 3 года назад +4

      @@veirant5004 or they just gave up on trying to block it and then had to save face by making up an excuse of why they stopped trying

    • @jomei01
      @jomei01 3 года назад

      @@veirant5004 i agree

  • @AcidiFy574
    @AcidiFy574 3 года назад +18

    So essentially we need a open source version of this
    MATRIX can help
    BTW, will you make a video about how to use GPG????

    • @michallabus96
      @michallabus96 3 года назад +1

      +1 on GPG!
      As it has quite a learning curve and IMO a high entry threshold, a tutorial (ideally a two-level one: a. for total normies and b. for people kinda into cybersec, but not knowledgeable about PGP/GPG) would be extremely useful and would be a great way to introduce non-techie friends to both this channel and GPG.

  • @Sir.suspicious
    @Sir.suspicious 3 года назад +14

    The problem with temp numbers for signing up is that they never seem to work, they either have been used before or are simply denied

    • @Josh-jw3go
      @Josh-jw3go 3 года назад +1

      Are prepaid sim cards at convenience stores still a thing near you?

  • @sappukei3618
    @sappukei3618 3 года назад +53

    tfw normies discover telegram

  • @Redbird093
    @Redbird093 3 года назад +18

    I get it man. Degrees of privacy and/or security.
    I use telegram first of all because it has better privacy respecting policies (given the latest censorship wave hitting most of main social media) and secondly I appreciate the features.
    I am fully aware of some OpSec. I assume that all data that has been put through the internet via encrypted channels is potentially usable against you. Everything is a trade-off.
    In short. I trust Telegram at this time. If it changes too much over time, I will simply move to a new tool.
    And in the process I will not put things I am not comfortable with online.
    I appreciate Telegram more for its neutrality when it comes to politics. A rare thing to find almost nowadays.

  • @nikolas8741
    @nikolas8741 3 года назад +6

    I've considered this app the "gateway drug" into private E2E communications. Most of my non tech friends got this at some point, and then theyll ask me "hey whats this secret chat end to end encryption thingy". Then I explain it, and then they say something like "Oh so like how Facebook and that sell your data" comes up soon after. Soon after that, many of them either end up using Secret Chats exclusively (when they can) or they'll make a bigger jump and go to something like signal. Telegram itself may not be the best option out there, but it's a way of alluring people who are not techies with big colorful stickers and fun features. I mean, Russia's Internet oversight authority RosKomNadzor has tried to block Telegram, but in the end it basically wiped out half of all AWS servers while Telegram barely even went down. I realise that's more a feature of their infrastructure, but it's got a good track record so far in terms of resilience to blocking attempts."Has more stickers ... so it's gonna be popular with the Zoomers" Wow, I got completely called out, my zoomer brain prefers it because of the big ass stickers packs(The limit is 120 I think) and the "You don't actually need your phone to use the desktop app", shitposting without having to constantly babysit my phone so it doesn't disconnect me because it got idle for too long is probably the main reason I mainly use Telegram

    • @nibli
      @nibli 3 года назад +8

      what is this amalgamation of copied comments

    • @snowfree6602
      @snowfree6602 3 года назад

      Nice meme

  • @falxie_
    @falxie_ 3 года назад +7

    I don't like the non-default e2e encryption and non-FOSS. I think Element could be good if getting it working wasn't such a pain

    • @falxie_
      @falxie_ 3 года назад +1

      @Omar Valentini It's not very intuitive to add friends when you first sign up

    • @randomdude4110
      @randomdude4110 3 года назад +2

      @@falxie_ But MUCH better then their last iteration, Riot, it was almost unusable.

    • @climatechangedoesntbargain9140
      @climatechangedoesntbargain9140 3 года назад +1

      @@falxie_ well, that don't force collecting phone numbers

  • @FlavioZanoni
    @FlavioZanoni 3 года назад +13

    I really like telegram, it's more secure, has it's downsides but was easier to get people into

    • @re57k
      @re57k 3 года назад +1

      @FreeBirb maybe compared to WhatsApp?

    • @re57k
      @re57k 3 года назад

      @FreeBirb hhhhhhhhj

  • @hindigente
    @hindigente 3 года назад +1

    The problem about these sorts of programs is that barely no one ever uses them. At least there are people who kind of use Telegram, but not so much other more security/privacy focused similar programs.

  • @bluethefoxyt
    @bluethefoxyt 3 года назад +13

    Him: Going to be popular with the zoomers.
    Me a furry: oh it goes way further than you think.

    • @mkilo9770
      @mkilo9770 3 года назад +2

      Stickerrrrrs

    • @bluethefoxyt
      @bluethefoxyt 3 года назад +1

      @@mkilo9770 indeed

    • @bluethefoxyt
      @bluethefoxyt 3 года назад

      My telegram group chat @blueschat2

    • @amyrosechaqueta
      @amyrosechaqueta 3 года назад +2

      The telegram's furry sticker market is massive, like HOLY SHIT

    • @bluethefoxyt
      @bluethefoxyt 3 года назад +1

      @@amyrosechaqueta indeed it is

  • @TheJackiMonster
    @TheJackiMonster 3 года назад +3

    Telegram is definitely less secure by design than Signal. The first problem is that chats aren't really more encrypted than using TLS to the central server. Even the "secret chats" are problematic because any end-to-end-encryption can be broken easily if it relies on a centralized structure. The central server can therefore perform a man-in-the-middle-attack on any user really. That also applies to Signal and Threema.
    Threema responded to this problem in a relatively good way by showing the state of physical verification in the contact list visually. So every user can easily see if the communication channel is trusted. Signal uses a "security number" to check just like WhatsApp which is obscuring the whole verification process of the encryption (which is not quite great) and it's pretty much hidden in the UI in comparison to Threema.
    Also when the security number in Signal changes (so your communication partner changes, their device changes or somebody else interfered the channel) you get a small notification in the chat (which gets basically ignored by most users). This does not happen on Threema because you need to explicitly clone your local key from device to device to keep your chats (so the key won't change) or you would need to use a new key and loose all chats at the same time. This may be inconvenient for general users but that's the price for actually good usage of encrypted chats.

  • @BoingoInstaller
    @BoingoInstaller 3 года назад +2

    Actually you will see ads in channels (maybe russian thing?), but ads are placed in 3rd-party platforms and channel owners just make posts with ads. Upcoming solution is to provide telegram's own ad platform and to make possible to distinguish ad posts from normal posts
    Reason for Telegram popularity is simple: enough features and at least some privacy. Open api made possible creating 3rd-party clients and bots, channels and groups gave basic social functions, community stickers with anime girls… And it is convenient for end user

  • @wafflelapkin
    @wafflelapkin 3 года назад +2

    Some minor corrections/additions to the video:
    - Channels are not like in discord. They are more like groups in social media I guess? Some limited amount of users (admins) can write, all others (subscribers) can only read.
    - Comments are made in a weird way: when you write a comment you actually writing a messenge to the linked group which is a replay to the past you comment (and you also do so without joining).
    - The bot API is BAD. It's good that it even exists, but overall it's just bad weird and not well thought. E.g. all strings are UTF-8 but code point indices they send to you are for UTF-16 strings (I was working with the API for a long time and there are a lot of similar weird things, trust me). Also the docs are only available in a human readable html, you can't use it to auto gen client libs.
    - The mtproto is even worse (though I didn't work with it).
    - Telegram is pretty resistent to government block, e.g. it was blocked in Russia and worked most of the time (and if it didn't you could setup a proxy). The government blocked half of the AWS trying to do something, but didn't succeed anyway. Also I assume it's 'blocked' in Iraq, but I don't know how well it works there (I've also heard that it works).
    Overall I would say that it's a good apps, but the "point" is totally not security (is better that WhatsApp, but I wouldn't call it secure anyway). The point is that it's easy to use, convenient and popular.
    Better than most social networks, but again: not private messaging app.

  • @Xtrems
    @Xtrems 3 года назад +6

    I try to pull my friends to telegram once in a while, and for some time it works but there always comes a time when they just randomly revert back to fb messenger for some bizzare reason like the share button from facebook allowing them to share stuff directly thru messenger.
    Boggles my mind, especially during the pandemic as facebook blackouts are so often and you just can't message anyone for half an hour, and messenger group chats were probably designed on shrooms as on pc a more lively convo just leads to the site crashing. Also the inability to send a picture without lossy compression makes me just furious

  • @Toleich
    @Toleich 3 года назад +2

    I don't buy the "don't roll your own" attitude that is common in the tech space. Sure you should give it a go and that will show you how much you don't know and you'll learn to value existing solutions.
    But to not roll your own as a rule? What if Satoshi followed the principle?

  • @JAzzWoods-ik4vv
    @JAzzWoods-ik4vv 3 года назад +7

    Honestly, good enough middle ground. Don't really care for signal, but I'll change if telegram goes down too.

  • @yuummyy6015
    @yuummyy6015 3 года назад +1

    As a man that is using telegram for 3 years, yeah your review is very correct and you mentioned almost everything that normal user would do.

  • @siwiecministro1994
    @siwiecministro1994 3 года назад +1

    @8:10 I'm sure that customizing of this program does not involve getting rid of overlay-scrollbars and having traditional (useful) ones so that one is not forced to kill one's hand when scrolling tens of pages back...

  • @athul_c1375
    @athul_c1375 3 года назад +9

    Groups can have 200000 members
    And you can send upto 2gb of files

  • @ricardosendes776
    @ricardosendes776 3 года назад +2

    signal should be the next popular messaging app.. telegram is a good step forward, but signal takes it a leap further

  • @lilythebluespheresfan2897
    @lilythebluespheresfan2897 3 года назад +7

    I was nervous predicting you to say closed-source every time before 5:24, huh...

  • @atarixle
    @atarixle 3 года назад +2

    Telegram is my mobile messenger of choice, just because I trust it more than Whatsapp. I'd rather use the encrypted jabber protocol, but barely anybody is willing or got the echnical background to use this anymore.

  • @alebubble4586
    @alebubble4586 3 года назад +2

    Telegram also provides a REST-ish API that allows you to build your own frontend app for it, there are a lot of apps for telegram like Unigram. I suggest anyone who doesn't like the original TG app try them instead.

  • @krellin
    @krellin 2 года назад +1

    Telegram Bot API is so underrated, you can build almost any application with it and still have a decent UI... i use it for my personal services and its awesome.

  • @HaroldCrews
    @HaroldCrews 3 года назад +2

    I use Telegram but mostly as a social network for people banned from Twitter and other mainstream social network sites. That is mostly passive. I rarely if ever comment. My preference for secure communications is Threema on the phone although that will likely change when I de-Google. I also use Signal, Wire, Element, and I would use Tox but no one I know is on it or seems interesting in using it.

  • @EagerEggplant
    @EagerEggplant 3 года назад +1

    Great video as always. I like Telegram's interface, and sometimes the bots come in clutch. Trying to use Signal more and more.

  • @Nurgul626
    @Nurgul626 3 года назад +2

    The "easy to block" part looks like an assumption. Russia tried to block it, but no luck. Also in August, there were riots in Belarus with complete Internet blackout: no external resources, and no mobile broadband at all. The whole state was blocked with Sandvine hardware, and even with such restrictions telegram was usable (sometimes with external mtproto proxies), unlike tens of other VPN services. And it was the only reliable way to communicate with other people.
    So I don't think it's fair just to drop "easy to block" bomb with no evidence or research, just based on assumption of main telegram server being a thing.
    Also some telegram forks allow you to have some security with fake account, which can be useful when you are forced to show your messages from your own phone.
    So as a mean to avoid Internet shutdown it's really good and battle-tested messenger, with extra layer of e2e if you need it

  • @EudesRJ
    @EudesRJ 3 года назад +4

    I use telegram for years, it's really good on groups, easier to manage and restrict in general or persons individually (no gifs, no stickers, no audio).
    Voice and video calls works great on telegram, sending files is handy.
    Not all chats needs do be end-to-end encrypted, but there's the option for who wants it.
    signal I use only with one contact and I it's ok, but behind telegram on usability.

  • @user-hj2kq2vl6y
    @user-hj2kq2vl6y 3 года назад +1

    Maybe you're right.
    But Pavel Durov the owner has declared a $10mil reward ro cracking their cryptography, and Russian government failed to block Telegram even though they're benn trying to do this for over 3 years now.
    I mean, sire it's not the best, but it's pretty damn good.
    The real concern though, would be the back doors that are probably there.

  • @aprilnya
    @aprilnya 3 года назад +3

    could you add spanish subtitles? i want to share this with some of my irl friends (since that's the only thing i used whatsapp for) but i live in spain and spanish people don't speak good english

  • @joeshmoe000
    @joeshmoe000 3 года назад +9

    I love how non-pretentious the name telegram is. All other social media names are childish.

    • @tomekdarda
      @tomekdarda 3 года назад +1

      This! Such a small yet big statement. And the icon is brilliantly thought out too. Intentional, interesting and nicely coloured.

  • @rybeenali4371
    @rybeenali4371 3 года назад +2

    Let's be real any chat app that have large users base is connected to FBI and CIA , and we forgot the fact that we're connected to the internet that is provided by them, i mean by countries governments.

  • @trentr9762
    @trentr9762 2 года назад +1

    Telegram is basically furry social media at this point

  • @hrsmp
    @hrsmp 3 года назад +2

    3:26 >stand back, we have math PhDs
    They do lol. Brother or Pavel Durov, Nikolai (i think the main guy behind telegram and other projects) has PhD in Algebraic geometry,
    arxiv.org/abs/0704.2030
    Not that it has to do with anything, but i think it's cool.

  • @Darignobullseye
    @Darignobullseye 3 года назад +1

    I appreciate all of this information.

  • @rabbitdrink
    @rabbitdrink 3 года назад +1

    i can trust telegram a lot better than google, the features are enough to make my family switch, and i cant trust any smartphone to keep e2e any more secure than telegram cloud chats. thats why i use it. if i need something more secure then ill use a different app.

  • @Wooperplus
    @Wooperplus 3 года назад +1

    I prefer their cloud chat encryption knowing that chats and encryption keys are not stored on the same servers.
    And they have been around since 2013 and make it clear that their policies mostly apply yo public channels and groups and not private.
    Also, the fact that you can self destruct your whole Telegram account remotely and your chats are not stored locally means no one can get into your chats or read your texts as they are not stored on your device. Unlike on Signal where your chats are all stored locally and all that would need to be done is bypass your lockscreen and open that app.

  • @christbaumer
    @christbaumer 3 года назад +2

    7:00 It seems like AdGram is just an optional revenue source for willing channel maintainers charging a ten per cent commission.

  • @TheKennyWorld
    @TheKennyWorld 2 года назад +1

    Telegram features are simply astonishing.

  • @user-ph1yj9rr2p
    @user-ph1yj9rr2p 3 года назад +1

    LMAO that Взломай Парня(hack your bf) channel at the end had me dieing

  • @vladimirtatarsky9928
    @vladimirtatarsky9928 3 года назад +1

    Please kindly tell us your telegram nickname so we can do the netstalking, thanks.
    Also is would be good of you to create a channel so we can do the bulling too.

  • @Xumatro
    @Xumatro 3 года назад +2

    I wish Briar had some more features and a better UI.

  • @arjunprs
    @arjunprs 2 года назад +2

    All the terrorists seem to love telegram... So, i guess if the government can't catch them, they can't catch me as well...

  • @bo4enko
    @bo4enko 2 года назад

    Mental, my dude, love your content
    Howewer the blocking thing about Telegram is wrong. Apparently it is very difficult to block out.
    About a year ago РКН in russia attempted to do just this for about 6 month, as a result it killed a whole bunch of payment and other services when telegram kept working

  • @happygimp0
    @happygimp0 3 года назад +2

    We should use Matrix.

  • @jorge28624
    @jorge28624 3 года назад +6

    I have both apps. All this scandal for the home-brew encryption. When will anyone make these theoretical attacks to the MTProto real? "Much talk, no action".

    • @dslylsd
      @dslylsd 3 года назад +2

      MtProto 2.0 fixed the problems with 1.0 its very secure

  • @ldohlj1
    @ldohlj1 3 года назад +1

    Just as a reminder, domain fronting is also blocked in Iran.

  • @people287
    @people287 2 года назад +1

    Telegram: it's where the furries are 🐺🐕

  • @anirudhreddy7671
    @anirudhreddy7671 3 года назад +1

    I think silence + twinme will be perfect alternative to WhatsApp or even Signal as twinme & silence are completely Open source & P2P thus 100% transparency and no downtime at all, but peer discovery isn't possible in it. That's where silence comes in, it uses existing network providers SMS infrastructure to send encrypted invites.

  • @alpacamale2909
    @alpacamale2909 3 года назад +6

    I wish signal aime to reach telegram's level of cuteness

    • @Ryan-xq3kl
      @Ryan-xq3kl 3 года назад +2

      I wish for people like you to find more worthy things to obsess over

    • @tacticalguy6473
      @tacticalguy6473 3 года назад

      @@Ryan-xq3kl i do obsessover telegrams 2.5gb per file limit, especially when i still can see my chats history from 2015 and still be able to download the files i sent back then.

    • @alpacamale2909
      @alpacamale2909 3 года назад +1

      @@Ryan-xq3kl Why can't people obsess over design and aesthetics?

  • @wobble_cat
    @wobble_cat 3 года назад +1

    Channels on telegram run ads for quite a long time. I guess, what telegram is going to do is to get their cut from those ad revenues by providing a convenient and secure way of running ads both for channels and advertisers.

  • @myentertainment55
    @myentertainment55 3 года назад

    I've been using it since 2017 with all my IT friends. It's pretty nice app :)

  • @AmirhoseinHerandy
    @AmirhoseinHerandy 3 года назад +6

    Telegram is perfect, have been using it for the past 4 years. Nothing even comes close.

    • @AmirhoseinHerandy
      @AmirhoseinHerandy 3 года назад

      @@kajacx You can give your ID instead if you set it up. Yeah no servers.

    • @AmirhoseinHerandy
      @AmirhoseinHerandy 3 года назад

      @@mamaluigi0631 Only to set it up

  • @donb6732
    @donb6732 2 года назад +1

    Is Telegram really for profit? As far I know thats not true. The founder Pavel Durov explicitly said once that Telegram is not a for-profit service and that a messenger shouldn't have the goal to make money.

  • @elclippo4182
    @elclippo4182 3 года назад +3

    „Heavily encrypted“ lmao

  • @mrnoob-333
    @mrnoob-333 2 года назад

    I used telegram for more than years and it's great with so much good Update support and with actually great Security and privacy .....I love it

  • @ashishpatel350
    @ashishpatel350 3 года назад +8

    Meh. I'd rather use signal over telegram. Just remember telegram is looking to monitize their app. And will end up worse than whatsapp.

    • @floriegl
      @floriegl 3 года назад +2

      Do you know how Signal will stay alive? They are in massive debt and currently just rely on donations.

  • @XZenon
    @XZenon 3 года назад +1

    Can you do a video explaining why peer-to-peer messaging clients never really managed to catch on?

  • @user-ec8mo1jn4m
    @user-ec8mo1jn4m 3 года назад +1

    Take my advice;
    Don't join group related to the US, because the private messages from Bitcoin scammers will rain on you.

  • @GooogleGoglee
    @GooogleGoglee 3 года назад

    I use it since it was developed. Amazing App! It is growth a lot!

  • @nitorobw
    @nitorobw 3 года назад

    Def interested in that Threema video, no actual PFS, only via TLS, so I do wonder why they might be more secure than signal

  • @extraspecialk3244
    @extraspecialk3244 3 года назад +1

    do a review of Signal vs it's fork Silence.
    also, Session - what do you think?

  • @goodgameplays9571
    @goodgameplays9571 3 года назад

    Hello mate! im honestly a big fan of your channel and i love it a lot! great content! Also can you please do a video about deep packet inspection? i can't see mto find any information about it , or just a lil small info

  • @KeligAvignon
    @KeligAvignon 3 года назад +4

    Telegram is well known in certain communities. Thanks to it's stickers packs, and some artists like NowAndLater.

    • @leastexpected3115
      @leastexpected3115 3 года назад

      Bruh, you exposed your furryass

    • @KeligAvignon
      @KeligAvignon 3 года назад +1

      @@leastexpected3115 Everybody saying they are using telegram since a while does at this point lmao

  • @legitt6093
    @legitt6093 3 года назад +1

    Please, do Matrix next :))

  • @lanylow
    @lanylow 3 года назад +1

    What about the chatting app called "Wire"? It seems like a really good option.

    • @floriegl
      @floriegl 3 года назад +1

      From what I have noticed it doesn't really have any real userbase. But checking with www.securemessagingapps.com/ it isn't really much butter than Signal except the juristriction.

  • @user-bv5bz2kz4t
    @user-bv5bz2kz4t 7 месяцев назад

    I read about MTProto, and it seems that it uses AES and RSA now

  • @avery464
    @avery464 3 года назад

    Hey if you have the time could you look at the purism librem collection in one of your videos? specifically the mini? Love your videos, keep it up:D

  • @punishedpinecone4772
    @punishedpinecone4772 3 года назад +1

    can you review Element/Matrix?

  • @solarwolf678
    @solarwolf678 3 года назад +9

    "Telegram review"
    Furries:my time has come

    • @legocreator768
      @legocreator768 3 года назад +1

      yup. agree.

    • @TheAechBomb
      @TheAechBomb 3 года назад +1

      furries seem to be the most security-conscious group besides actual security-centric groups

  • @YuraJayRJay
    @YuraJayRJay 3 года назад

    * Supergroups are up to 200 000 people and support voice chats with up to 5 000 members on top of that.

  • @juandhaltrich
    @juandhaltrich 3 года назад

    'CHADS' was a brilliant comment

  • @murrayvonmises
    @murrayvonmises 3 года назад +1

    Do a video on RCLONE: open source Cloud Storage with E2E encryption

  • @obesecow5706
    @obesecow5706 3 месяца назад

    yo why does having more features = having less privacy?

  • @OK.156
    @OK.156 3 года назад +2

    my first intercation with telegram was a ctf that had furries and I had to interact with the furries with stickers to get the flag
    it wasnt fun

  • @user-uk5ls1my1i
    @user-uk5ls1my1i 3 года назад +2

    All instant messaging software is rubbish in front of Telegram

  • @Amike
    @Amike 3 года назад

    I find telegram to be a good alternative for the masses. You have the best of both worlds (maybe not the best)

  • @stephenkamenar
    @stephenkamenar 3 года назад +1

    none of your telegram chats are encrypted at all. unless you use the private chat, which isn't even an option on the desktop app

    • @floriegl
      @floriegl 3 года назад

      Did you actually watch the video? Except of the desktop version he mentioned how the encryption is handled.

    • @stephenkamenar
      @stephenkamenar 3 года назад

      @@floriegl just putting it also as a comment because it's super important

  • @RandomCoffee101
    @RandomCoffee101 3 года назад +1

    Group chats go up not to 5000, but to 200000 users

  • @y857n
    @y857n 3 года назад +10

    Telegram is just skype and discord combined into one

  • @allmighty_cs
    @allmighty_cs 3 года назад +1

    You should do an overview for burner sms like you did with burner emails.

    • @floriegl
      @floriegl 3 года назад

      No, good sites and services don't need any extra attention or they wont work as well.

  • @krassebewegtbilder
    @krassebewegtbilder 3 года назад +1

    Could you review element.io? I think it's even more secure than Signal and if I get my friends to switch, I suggest them to switch to element.

  • @bubblineyuri
    @bubblineyuri 3 года назад +1

    What about Element?

  • @the_aurora
    @the_aurora 3 года назад +2

    4:30 I would like to point out, that multiple countries, on multiple occasions tried to block telegram but failed. The most noteworthy one is probably Russia, telegram was officially banned for a long time but every time telegram found a way around it.

  • @ZaberfangX
    @ZaberfangX 3 года назад +2

    I was told abit back I sign up singel with just a email. On Google play is like need a phone number. But I got it anyhow never know when I need to use it. I did look in to theema still up in the air about it. I would pay for it if I got friends come and pay with me.

  • @arkoprovo1996
    @arkoprovo1996 3 года назад +1

    please do a review of element/matrix