🎥 Join our RUclips members and patrons to unlock exclusive content! Our community is currently enjoying deep dives into the First Punic War, Pacific War, history of Prussia, Italian Unification Wars, Russo-Japanese War, Albigensian Crusade, and Xenophon’s Anabasis. Become a part of this exclusive circle: ruclips.net/channel/UCMmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fwjoin or patron: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals and Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!
hey, consider adding more context/a brief recap of previous events, before dropping these new videos. They can be a bit confusing to start watching and it gets kind of hard to keep track of events.
It's a good video but i don't understand why it's be count as a 2nd crusade video while the 2nd crusade only started in 1146 unless this serie covered also everything between the 1st and 2nd crusade ?
The interwar period between the First and Second crusades is a very underrated and unknown part of its history. Despite featuring very important and noteworthy engagements.
Well in Western literature and History, it's underrated because it was a defeat same with 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Crusade where in the middle-eastern countries plus Turkey it is highly rated because how the Muslim won many great victory in those wars.
Something about the emphasis on "draw" makes me smile. Makes me imagine the two sides arguing and saying their own side won, only for a historian to passive-aggressively interject "it was a draw" occasionally.
@@PhilipusArabus the fact that the Crusaders held those cities so long is impressive. They were up against opponents who should have beaten them way earlier than what actually played out.
@@theawesomeman9821 they couldn’t advance any further beyond these cities. Arabs held Spain for 800 years, yet they were outnumbered by other Europeans. It took Arabs only 2,5 years to reconquer spain
It was the time when some knights for the first crusade were still alive until the death of Baudouin 2 and the seljuks were still disunited. The crusaders will have the upper hand in Syria until Azaz in 1125 but when Zengi will become atabeg of Mossoul in 1127, playtime will sadly be over.
Thanks team. I come from a mixed Muslim / Christian heritage and through axhaustive research I have that I had ancestors on both sides of.this battle. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha'-ha !
I really loved this one, one of the names has a little tie. Courtenay. The red trefoils on a field of yellow. I had heard of him in my research of my family name. I am however Irish, original Garlic name morphed into Courtney so I am not a descendant, I am from the Black Irish, Iberian genes. Doesn't matter it is the name. There is a Camp Courtney on Okinawa, MOH recipient Major Courtney USMC. My son, CPL Courtney USMC, got double takes on his name tape when he was there. You are the first to even mention the Courtenays, thank you.
This series is gonna be good! Will we get a remake of the third crusade? The old video is Great but it doesn't even come close to this level of quality
Thanks for the video! One small nitpick: At 2:54 you call Bohemond II "the de facto ruler". It's precisely the reverse: he was the "de jure" ruler, while the "de facto" rulers were first Bernard and later Baldwin II.
Great videos as always! Please make future videos of Queen Nzinga, Queen Amanirenas, Piye, Shaka Zulu, Samore Toure, and many other African warriors/heroes.....
Conceited and delusional, they are still living in civil war among bashar backed russia, shiites backed iran, kurdish backed american and turkish invasion(nato). And you dissed their intellect just because you watch a youtube video.
2nd Crusade is probably my favourite, as both sides are pretty much evenly matched in terms of numbers and experience. The Zengids put a whooping on the Christians, but they still held together to survive.
K&G sorry out of topic, but I would like to suggest you guys to make a documentary about "Battle of the Masts" (650s), the battle is described in less detail in "Early Muslim Conquest" series and i hope you guys will make a documentary with more detail about that
Can you make a video of the society in the Crusader states like their way of life their social heirarchy and relations with other states within the East?
Another great episode! Very very minor point, you pronounce the Battle of the Field of Blood in French but Ager Sanguinis [AH-gher SAN-gwih-nihz] is the Latin term. It just makes it sound like “To Shake Saint Guinis”😅
damn ilghazi and Toktemin are like richard the lionheart good commanders but terrible people fond of execuding priosners. Robert's unwillingness to sell his soul to save his life is admirable as well.
Looking forward to more of the 2nd Crusade. The main thing I know about it is Eleanor of Aquitaine (then queen of France) bringing her ladies-in-waiting as trained knights on crusade, much to the bewilderment of the more culturally conservative Romans.
@@KawXar2004 1. I am an orthodox Christian not catholic 2. One thing is me saying something and the other you assuming it 3. The Christians weren’t really at fault for the crusades
Another fantastic video on the lead up to the second crusade and showing if it weren’t for the resilience of the crusaders in defeat, decisive leadership and tactical superiority sided by a few Muslim Mistakes, crusader states counsel have fallen much sooner than they actually did.
Interesting times. Didn't know much about any of the major players though the story about the failed ransom because the captive refused to convert and was killed is familiar for some reason.
you should add more background context, and a brief recap of previous episodes, before dropping these videos. It can get confusing to start watching and hard to keep track of events.
crusaders were heavily armored, more zealous, well trained, and battle hardened while Muslim forces were mostly light armored horse archers and infantry. It is like special forces against a more numerous regular army troops.
There really wasn't much the Muslims could do against heavily armored European knights in a stand up fight, Saladin is considered by some one of the greatest Muslim generals of all time and even he lost most of his battles against the crusaders even though he ALWAYS outnumbered them. They were like medieval tanks, you had to trick them into a trap to deal with them you just could not take them on in a stand up fight.
@@zjeee ohhhh thanks for the info. i swear if you had cavalry you basically had the strongest army? example mongols leashed hell upon every army it faced having almost all cavalry bow archers contingent as well as being light armored? that baffles me
@@okancanarslan3730 again tho mongols leashed hell upon heavy armored and well trained foot infantry and they were almost all horse archers and light armored?
Hey Kings and Generals team, can you make a video on how did the Powers in Europe react to the initial Muslim conquests of Byzantine territory and Iberia? We usually only focus on later Crusades and Reconquista years after Islam makes contact with the Christian world. Did they think it was a usual invasion of Barbarians and that these people would eventually convert to Christianity or leave and didn't have a goal of converting them to a new religion? How aware were they of Islam in the beginning? That would be an interesting video.
Very nice animation done by Malay Archer. The man is truly amazing and has used some nice mods for this project. Speaking of mods, MA if you are reading this, could you send a full list of mods used in your TW videos?
please do a video on these (this is a copy and paste list for a few channels) history of south Russia (just above caucuses) how Mongolia helped Russia in ww2 and cold war, life as a Christian/jew in rome life as a jew/, Muslim in Byzantine Empire life as a non Muslim in arab empires greek life under rome, Mongolia life under china, and later in ww2/cold war and mabey a little on modern the scholae palatine units and tactics/evaluation of loadouts of troops (from different jobs (and other branches) like the 82 snd 101 airborne units or infantry tank units, (or when tanks were assigned a infantry unit like i think earlier war Russia then all tanks were formed into there own units wich meant the infantry no longer knew the true strength of there own tanks but alowed tank units to fight more efficiently) the evaluation of tank doctrine of countries evaluation of tanks/armored vehicles of different countries evaluation of aircraft types of different countries, different between navil and army/air force fighters logistics units of the axes and allied powers in ww2 ww1 estern front tactics Russian Civil war tactics and strategies navil ship cross sections (all the rooms and how it all works) evaluation of types of ships or evaluation of navil warfare (or just dedectsded videos on ww1 and ww2 navil doctrine as theres stuff out there on other times of history) air craft carrier strike group formations exsamples (from different countries) ancient persan ships, ancient veneti ships (gauls that fought ceaser) ships used by genoa and the vernesain republic the vernesain republic government all sailing ships, (i know theres many on yt but some contradict each other and i think theres more left out) ancient macenean greek and trojan troops 2b9 vasilyok morter tactics used so far in the Ukraine war, better for squads to be 2 teams of 5 or 3 teams of 3, and probably the easiest, better to keep troops well feed or starved like an animal how dose age effect comsnders eg napoleon got older so took less risks, ancient urban warfare ww2 tactics in Asia, tactics in the Chinese age of warlords, (and Chinese civil war) tactics in the ruso jap war cold war navil tactics, Korean war tactics, strange tactics or unque battles from the American war of independence and America civil how were 17th centry sailing ships build comands given on sailing ships (like ease the sheets and get ready to chine, or slack n beases, basically things you hear movie capitns say) why did the nazis never return (or a video on best occupations) why did the Japanese empire fall, dont just say "America" like things like how there army and navy argued alot alot more on the Polynesians and māori, but please learn pronounceations if you do this
Elgazi did manage to take more benefits then any loser, losers does lose, they doesn't bargain anything or they doesn't win anything. So it's very hard to say, who did win. Both sides did gained something from this battle.
Love the series. But... why are you calling this period "Second Crusade"? The Second Crusade started with the fall of Edessa in 1144. Granted, there were always expeditions going to the Holy Land since 1100 (going on Crusade was to undertake a pilgrimage), but historiography always considers the Second Crusade as taking place in the 1140s. If you consider the late 1110s as Second Crusade, well, it wouldn't even be the Second if one considers the expeditions of the 1100s...
We have explained why we have divided the events this way. Basically, as soon as most of the leaders of the first crusade died, prelude to the second Crusade started
I think if the eastern roman empire would have engaged battle in favour of the cruseders against the arabs, their history might have had a better faith...
why you r using term of (Saracens army) !!!! this is offensive my friend ... Saracens meaning (thieves ) by Crusader's ... the term is a Muslims army or Arabic army as u r using Christians army !!!
Try practicing grattitude instead of greed. you may not have had a mother in your life so let me be the one to teach you that it is always better to ask someone that to demand it. especially if they've given you something for free. In my culture it is considered quite rude to complain about a gift.
🎥 Join our RUclips members and patrons to unlock exclusive content! Our community is currently enjoying deep dives into the First Punic War, Pacific War, history of Prussia, Italian Unification Wars, Russo-Japanese War, Albigensian Crusade, and Xenophon’s Anabasis. Become a part of this exclusive circle: ruclips.net/channel/UCMmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fwjoin or patron: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals and Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!
hey, consider adding more context/a brief recap of previous events, before dropping these new videos. They can be a bit confusing to start watching and it gets kind of hard to keep track of events.
@@ThomasBarth-gr1sz previous episodes are always linked
It's a good video but i don't understand why it's be count as a 2nd crusade video while the 2nd crusade only started in 1146 unless this serie covered also everything between the 1st and 2nd crusade ?
@@robert-surcouf check out our video on the 1st crusade. It explains the rationale
@@KingsandGenerals more vids pls
The interwar period between the First and Second crusades is a very underrated and unknown part of its history. Despite featuring very important and noteworthy engagements.
Big fan of the Crusade series! Thank you for this video. I think the Second Crusade is very underrated.
Yes very underrated one, even many of history youtuber instead somehow skip this second crusade and jump into the third one
Every crusade after the 5th be like:
Guess we'll just die
This isn’t the Second Crusade.
Thanks for making me dislike the word underrated by overusing it
Well in Western literature and History, it's underrated because it was a defeat same with 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Crusade where in the middle-eastern countries plus Turkey it is highly rated because how the Muslim won many great victory in those wars.
Something about the emphasis on "draw" makes me smile. Makes me imagine the two sides arguing and saying their own side won, only for a historian to passive-aggressively interject "it was a draw" occasionally.
One of the best channels on medieval history out there. Keep up the good work!
Please cover this period to the 1291 siege of Acre. This series has been an enthralling ride so far!!
We will!
My favorite series!
The fact that the Crusaders were drastically outnumbered yet lasted as long as they did is an amazing feature in itself.
Quality over quantity
The were only in walled cities on the coastal line with no advance deeper.
@@zjeeeread siege of Acre 1291 AD. Western Europe vs one tony Palestinian city
@@PhilipusArabus the fact that the Crusaders held those cities so long is impressive. They were up against opponents who should have beaten them way earlier than what actually played out.
@@theawesomeman9821 they couldn’t advance any further beyond these cities. Arabs held Spain for 800 years, yet they were outnumbered by other Europeans. It took Arabs only 2,5 years to reconquer spain
It was the time when some knights for the first crusade were still alive until the death of Baudouin 2 and the seljuks were still disunited.
The crusaders will have the upper hand in Syria until Azaz in 1125 but when Zengi will become atabeg of Mossoul in 1127, playtime will sadly be over.
Another great video! love the crusade series!
Amazingly done can't wait for the rest of second crusade videos
Username... checks out?
When K&G drops a new video, you already know it's a good day 😎
Please keep up these very interesting video's. The Second Crusade is not talked about enough.
The recent openings of the 2nd Crusade series have been eerily similar to videos by BazBattles, I wonder if he is involved in this.
Nope
you know its gonna be a good day when a kings and generals video drops
Thanks team. I come from a mixed Muslim / Christian heritage and through axhaustive research I have that I had ancestors on both sides of.this battle. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha'-ha !
thank you so much!!
How about The Battle of Artah(1105), a Battle between Tancred and Ridwan
Covered in the first crusade
I really loved this one, one of the names has a little tie. Courtenay. The red trefoils on a field of yellow. I had heard of him in my research of my family name. I am however Irish, original Garlic name morphed into Courtney so I am not a descendant, I am from the Black Irish, Iberian genes.
Doesn't matter it is the name.
There is a Camp Courtney on Okinawa, MOH recipient Major Courtney USMC. My son, CPL Courtney USMC, got double takes on his name tape when he was there.
You are the first to even mention the Courtenays, thank you.
This series is gonna be good! Will we get a remake of the third crusade? The old video is Great but it doesn't even come close to this level of quality
Yep, at some point
@@KingsandGenerals thank you guys! Keep up the good work, pretty excited to see the wars of the diadochi!
Thank you so much for the video ⚔️
This Crusades series has been amazing! 🔥⚔👏
Nicholas Morton's 'Field of Blood' book is a great read for anyone interested in this time period
Excellent video 📹
Thanks for the video! One small nitpick: At 2:54 you call Bohemond II "the de facto ruler". It's precisely the reverse: he was the "de jure" ruler, while the "de facto" rulers were first Bernard and later Baldwin II.
Well done so when will you guys finish the mongols in Europe series in wizards
March, hopefully. I finished writing the episode in January, but it is long and convoluted. We'll see.
do the Mongols win.@@KingsandGenerals
Great videos as always! Please make future videos of Queen Nzinga, Queen Amanirenas, Piye, Shaka Zulu, Samore Toure, and many other African warriors/heroes.....
I bet the locals in there don't know this history.
Conceited and delusional, they are still living in civil war among bashar backed russia, shiites backed iran, kurdish backed american and turkish invasion(nato). And you dissed their intellect just because you watch a youtube video.
Excellent work on the breakdown of a unique times of history.
Love these crusade videos. Why couldn't I have been there 😅
Amazing videos. Keep up the good work 👍
That was great, more Crusader stories would be appreciated!
2nd Crusade is probably my favourite, as both sides are pretty much evenly matched in terms of numbers and experience. The Zengids put a whooping on the Christians, but they still held together to survive.
K&G sorry out of topic, but I would like to suggest you guys to make a documentary about "Battle of the Masts" (650s), the battle is described in less detail in "Early Muslim Conquest" series and i hope you guys will make a documentary with more detail about that
Can you make a video of the society in the Crusader states like their way of life their social heirarchy and relations with other states within the East?
Another great episode!
Very very minor point, you pronounce the Battle of the Field of Blood in French but Ager Sanguinis [AH-gher SAN-gwih-nihz] is the Latin term. It just makes it sound like “To Shake Saint Guinis”😅
Or AH-jehr san-GWEE-nis in medieval lain
I’m absolutely loving this series on the aftermath of the first crusade and build up to the second?
Can you talk about the Byzantine Perspective on this Second Crusade 🙏🙏?
Because it's interesting and underrated topic.
Awesome
damn ilghazi and Toktemin are like richard the lionheart good commanders but terrible people fond of execuding priosners. Robert's unwillingness to sell his soul to save his life is admirable as well.
it's spelled executed*
Hail to the king!
I can only imagine Robert seeing his leprosy as a blessing during his final moments, you cant threaten a dying man with death
Looking forward to more of the 2nd Crusade. The main thing I know about it is Eleanor of Aquitaine (then queen of France) bringing her ladies-in-waiting as trained knights on crusade, much to the bewilderment of the more culturally conservative Romans.
Romans: Europeans: are free, women fight, that's why Khosrow
Hallelujah
@@KawXar2004 calm down please.
@@KawXar2004 1. I am an orthodox Christian not catholic
2. One thing is me saying something and the other you assuming it
3. The Christians weren’t really at fault for the crusades
Strength and Honor! Deus lo vult...
Love the crusade videos
Great video 👍🏻
Such a Great Show !!!!!!!
Thanks!
great job also are you going to continue the ottoman series until the fall of the empire after WW1 ??
speaking of WW1 It would be great
if you guys did series on it.
Ya
thank you
Good video. Keep up the good work. Hate how the best shit is on your subscription platform.
Another fantastic video on the lead up to the second crusade and showing if it weren’t for the resilience of the crusaders in defeat, decisive leadership and tactical superiority sided by a few Muslim Mistakes, crusader states counsel have fallen much sooner than they actually did.
Interesting times. Didn't know much about any of the major players though the story about the failed ransom because the captive refused to convert and was killed is familiar for some reason.
I love the way it is 2d animated
you should add more background context, and a brief recap of previous episodes, before dropping these videos. It can get confusing to start watching and hard to keep track of events.
Previous episode is linked in the description
don't bother
Mongols season 1 remake please
Do a whole video on Nur Ad Din Zengid. He was just as badass as Baybars and Salahaddin.
can you do the battle of badar
having an army almost 2-3 times the size and loosing is just crazy to see.
crusaders were heavily armored, more zealous, well trained, and battle hardened while Muslim forces were mostly light armored horse archers and infantry. It is like special forces against a more numerous regular army troops.
There really wasn't much the Muslims could do against heavily armored European knights in a stand up fight, Saladin is considered by some one of the greatest Muslim generals of all time and even he lost most of his battles against the crusaders even though he ALWAYS outnumbered them. They were like medieval tanks, you had to trick them into a trap to deal with them you just could not take them on in a stand up fight.
@@okancanarslan3730 why do you feel the Christians were more Zealous?
@@zjeee ohhhh thanks for the info. i swear if you had cavalry you basically had the strongest army? example mongols leashed hell upon every army it faced having almost all cavalry bow archers contingent as well as being light armored? that baffles me
@@okancanarslan3730 again tho mongols leashed hell upon heavy armored and well trained foot infantry and they were almost all horse archers and light armored?
Hey Kings and Generals team, can you make a video on how did the Powers in Europe react to the initial Muslim conquests of Byzantine territory and Iberia? We usually only focus on later Crusades and Reconquista years after Islam makes contact with the Christian world. Did they think it was a usual invasion of Barbarians and that these people would eventually convert to Christianity or leave and didn't have a goal of converting them to a new religion? How aware were they of Islam in the beginning? That would be an interesting video.
Very nice animation done by Malay Archer. The man is truly amazing and has used some nice mods for this project.
Speaking of mods, MA if you are reading this, could you send a full list of mods used in your TW videos?
A second crusade? At this point its just a bad Hab(it)
please do a video on these
(this is a copy and paste list for a few channels)
history of south Russia (just above caucuses)
how Mongolia helped Russia in ww2 and cold war,
life as a Christian/jew in rome
life as a jew/, Muslim in Byzantine Empire
life as a non Muslim in arab empires
greek life under rome,
Mongolia life under china, and later in ww2/cold war and mabey a little on modern
the scholae palatine
units and tactics/evaluation of loadouts of troops (from different jobs (and other branches)
like the 82 snd 101 airborne units
or infantry tank units, (or when tanks were assigned a infantry unit like i think earlier war Russia then all tanks were formed into there own units wich meant the infantry no longer knew the true strength of there own tanks but alowed tank units to fight more efficiently)
the evaluation of tank doctrine of countries
evaluation of tanks/armored vehicles of different countries
evaluation of aircraft types of different countries,
different between navil and army/air force fighters
logistics units of the axes and allied powers in ww2
ww1 estern front tactics
Russian Civil war tactics and strategies
navil ship cross sections (all the rooms and how it all works)
evaluation of types of ships
or evaluation of navil warfare (or just dedectsded videos on ww1 and ww2 navil doctrine as theres stuff out there on other times of history)
air craft carrier strike group formations exsamples (from different countries)
ancient persan ships,
ancient veneti ships (gauls that fought ceaser)
ships used by genoa and the vernesain republic
the vernesain republic government
all sailing ships, (i know theres many on yt but some contradict each other and i think theres more left out)
ancient macenean greek and trojan troops
2b9 vasilyok morter
tactics used so far in the Ukraine war,
better for squads to be 2 teams of 5 or 3 teams of 3,
and probably the easiest, better to keep troops well feed or starved like an animal
how dose age effect comsnders eg napoleon got older so took less risks,
ancient urban warfare
ww2 tactics in Asia, tactics in the Chinese age of warlords, (and Chinese civil war)
tactics in the ruso jap war
cold war navil tactics,
Korean war tactics,
strange tactics or unque battles from the American war of independence and America civil
how were 17th centry sailing ships build
comands given on sailing ships (like ease the sheets and get ready to chine, or slack n beases, basically things you hear movie capitns say)
why did the nazis never return (or a video on best occupations)
why did the Japanese empire fall, dont just say "America" like things like how there army and navy argued alot
alot more on the Polynesians and māori, but please learn pronounceations if you do this
Nice
What about this is the second crusade? Or is it more of a setup for the broader story.
This channel must be a best source for History teachers to copy from.
Hello, hey brother, I love your content, but I would like you to put more subtitles in Spanish.🤙
Is this only video for 2nd crusade?
No, check the playlist and description
by the way the Zengids were not defeated in any battle by the Crusaders according to Muslim chronicals
Elgazi did manage to take more benefits then any loser, losers does lose, they doesn't bargain anything or they doesn't win anything. So it's very hard to say, who did win.
Both sides did gained something from this battle.
This was disputed victory also artuqids claims victory ✌
Something from Serbia vs K.u.K? No?
Love the series. But... why are you calling this period "Second Crusade"? The Second Crusade started with the fall of Edessa in 1144. Granted, there were always expeditions going to the Holy Land since 1100 (going on Crusade was to undertake a pilgrimage), but historiography always considers the Second Crusade as taking place in the 1140s. If you consider the late 1110s as Second Crusade, well, it wouldn't even be the Second if one considers the expeditions of the 1100s...
Any war fallow after the second crusader still counts as the second until the 3th crusader started
@@moonshadowsong but this video does not talk about a war after the Second Crusade.
⚔️⚔️
supple stuff
Sacrifice to the algorithm
The Second Crusade was from 1147-1150. Wouldn’t this be post First Crusade Jerusalem?
We have explained why we have divided the events this way. Basically, as soon as most of the leaders of the first crusade died, prelude to the second Crusade started
Do more and make more about the seljuks
It should be called battle of Habibi
To me it definitely seemed like a Phyrric victory to the Latins, but a victory none the less and against overwhelming odds.
I think if the eastern roman empire would have engaged battle in favour of the cruseders against the arabs, their history might have had a better faith...
Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam
Why did you pronounce “Ager Sanguinis” as if it was a French name, it’s Latin.
Russo-Japanese war??? How did I missed that?
Never do battle against a Baldwin ... especially if he has a prop gun.
And yet I lost (burn)
Crusader wars 2: baldwin strikes back
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Serbian title??
✝️✝️✝️
why you r using term of (Saracens army) !!!! this is offensive my friend ... Saracens meaning (thieves ) by Crusader's ... the term is a Muslims army or Arabic army as u r using Christians army !!!
to be fair this was a largely turkic not arab army so calling it arabic would be wrong as well,
Arabic or Turkic no difference my friend they are all called Islamic army @@user-zh6fx4mh4p
Ilgazi's butt was kicked 2 years later by Georgians, at the battle of Didgori on August 12, 1121.
Not Georgians but by their Kipchak mercenaries.
Turks are not saracens ılghazi and togtekin was turkish warlords .their army was mostly turkish not arab
Why is there no translation in Arabic? You are a big channel and creating translation is not difficult
If it is not difficult, create it and send our way. We don't have a budget for that.
Just use auto translate man, I used the feature to change the English subtitles to Indonesian subtitle
Try practicing grattitude instead of greed. you may not have had a mother in your life so let me be the one to teach you that it is always better to ask someone that to demand it. especially if they've given you something for free. In my culture it is considered quite rude to complain about a gift.
:)
🎪🎪🎪
🎪🎪🎪🎪
When Gaza and Ukraine new videos?
L
i blame the latins failure for Palestine today
Muslim horse archers were totally worthless at all time