nearly all tools and weapons in those days had a body of iron , or iron and steel rods twisted and forge welded together, and a steel cutting edge. Making iron by hand is a pain in the butt. we in the Guild of Metalsmiths do it once in a while, but it takes a group of 'smiths twp days or more to make ten pounds of iron. Making the iron into steel takes more time , and great skill.
I'm getting sick of these AI-narrated historical videos where most of it seems like fantasy with a splash of reality. Makes the whole thing seem like nonsense
1066 (date for tapestry events) was NOT the "Viking" (properly called transition) period, it's after. This bond you talk of is silly, it's to keep the haft from splitting. Your research is a bit fanciful in focus. Was looking for some fact based info, you show a little but the fantastical claims are just too much.
"it wasn't just a weapon, it was a tool of destruction" ah yes the floor is made out of floor Why would you ruin your credibility ? Sure, the dane axe is super cool, but it's an axe, just like any other weapon. It could be well made by a master or poorly made for a quick buck, it's essentially a piece of metal stuck to a wooden shaft. It wasn't magic, it couldn't cut through time and space. You keep jumping back and forth between facts and romanticized "poetic" statements. I suggest you pick one and be honest about it. Talk about the function and practical uses of each feature of the weapon, or you can talk about how cool and fearsome it was. If you keep jumping back and forth, the facts will sound like nonsense, then saying just the most obvious, redundant, "dramatic" stuff imaginable makes the whole thing seem silly and juvenile. Like another commenter here said, it's all too fanciful.
awesome
nearly all tools and weapons in those days had a body of iron , or iron and steel rods twisted and forge welded together, and a steel cutting edge. Making iron by hand is a pain in the butt. we in the Guild of Metalsmiths do it once in a while, but it takes a group of 'smiths twp days or more to make ten pounds of iron. Making the iron into steel takes more time , and great skill.
interesting video
I'm getting sick of these AI-narrated historical videos where most of it seems like fantasy with a splash of reality. Makes the whole thing seem like nonsense
Thank you
cut through armor?
Not really... He said that it can cut through plate armor... They never encountered plate armor...
1066 (date for tapestry events) was NOT the "Viking" (properly called transition) period, it's after. This bond you talk of is silly, it's to keep the haft from splitting. Your research is a bit fanciful in focus. Was looking for some fact based info, you show a little but the fantastical claims are just too much.
Wow
Ember orang atas tutupnya pandai besi . Secara betul kapak dua bukan tutup.
The hole in the blade was nothing to do with throwing it was to tie a blade guard onto the blade. Try throwing a Dane axe and see how stupid it is.
"it wasn't just a weapon, it was a tool of destruction"
ah yes the floor is made out of floor
Why would you ruin your credibility ? Sure, the dane axe is super cool, but it's an axe, just like any other weapon. It could be well made by a master or poorly made for a quick buck, it's essentially a piece of metal stuck to a wooden shaft. It wasn't magic, it couldn't cut through time and space. You keep jumping back and forth between facts and romanticized "poetic" statements. I suggest you pick one and be honest about it. Talk about the function and practical uses of each feature of the weapon, or you can talk about how cool and fearsome it was. If you keep jumping back and forth, the facts will sound like nonsense, then saying just the most obvious, redundant, "dramatic" stuff imaginable makes the whole thing seem silly and juvenile. Like another commenter here said, it's all too fanciful.
10% factual historical info...
90% fantastical claims of the power of dane axe & glorifying fantasy version of vikings.