A fucking ipad drops from SPACE and the screen doesn't have a single crack, my iphone drops from my pocket and the screen looks like it was tossed inside a blender.
***** What makes you think it won't go faster than 9.81 m/s? You wouldn't happen to be confusing terminal velocity with the gravitational force for Earth at sea level of ~9.81 m/s^2 would you?
Acceleration and velocity are not one and the same, although they are related. The acceleration you keep talking about is measured in meters per second squared, or meters per second per second, (m/s^2) which describes how fast an object will change its velocity (speed up or slow down). Velocity (sometimes mistakenly referred to as speed but close enough for this discussion) on the other hand, is measured in meters per second (m/s). Terminal velocity is the velocity at which an object experiences the same acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2) as the acceleration due to friction (air resistance in this case) in the opposite direction. Terminal velocity for any given object could be almost 0 m/s for something like a grain of dust to thousands of m/s for say a telephone pole made of depleted uranium with fins to keep it pointed downward (not your every day object but as an example, it would fall hella' fast). I would estimate the terminal velocity for an iPad is 20-30 m/s based only on a barely intuitive guess.
***** I realize this is the internet, and we are supposed to be negative and critical of everything, but if they were going to fake this wouldn't it be easier to just film the recovery first, or use 2 iPads? Building a super iPad with thicker glass and metal seems like a much harder task. And yes, it was "inside a rubber", the whole point was to demonstrate the case is durable. Can't do that without putting it in a case.
Calling this bull. Firstly, 100,000 feet is *not* the edge of space. Hardly near it. Secondly, the pressure difference, if it *would* have reached the edge, will totally obliterate the liquid crystal solution of the screen (different pressure = different boiling points). Falling from that hight would have vaporised the pad as soon as it hit the ground, scattering its components in a few hundred meter radius. Near the end of the vid there is obviously some there that slows down the fall, most likely a parachute. If this really survived the fall in the way you claim, why don't you already have a job at NASA or ESA developing emergency capsules?
Hosterofdarest ! I would've used a bit different wording than Mike Chapman here; but yes, they don't work for NASA, otherwise this would be part of one of their tech videos, and the "equipment" would have NASA logo's plastered all over it. At least one of them would've said something about NASA.
The edge of space is 62 miles up, leaving this at 1/3 of that height, so the claim is not too deceptive. Additionally the fall from space if it were at 62 miles would result in the same end as the current video since it is almost certain that the iPad + camera contraption was traveling at terminal velocity when it hit the ground. It wouldn't have been vaporized or have hit the ground at crazy speeds. However, if it were traveling at orbital speeds and then re-entered, it would be a charred mess by the time it hit the ground.
Drop an iPad from space, doesn't even have a scratch... Drop it out of your hands from 2-3 feet in the air, pretty much shatters in pieces... Apple products everybody..! 😂
+Caden Koetje The point of this video is to show off the _CASE_ around the iPad, not the iPad itself. If an iPad without the case fell from the edges of space, it would _literally_ shatter if it didn't start melting from the atmospheric drag.
When I tried this from my secret fortress on a planet in another galaxy, a species of talking birds more annoying than Kaepora Gaebora found it and interpreted it as a declaration of war.
Man: I broke my IPad can you fix it Apple employee: How did it break? Man: i sent it into space and let it fall back to me Apple employee: Sir are you sober?
If you think about it, regardless of high it falls the terminal velocity would be achieved in a couple hundred feet, thus making to difference to the fall.
Willoughby Krenzteinburg I am saying that the way they dropped the ipad is not realistic or practical to how the ipad itself can actually stay together, I am aware and am not concerned about the advertisment.
The movie's "still playing"? From what I saw, the movie was showing the opening Disney logo when they checked it. It would be a HUGE coincidence if, on repeat, it took it the exact movie time to go up and back down. This opens up the possibility that they just switched out the one that potentially broke from re-entry, and switched it for a new one. I call fake.
Re-entry? It NEVER left the atmosphere! lol They sure would have wasted a lot of money to get a permit from the FAA to fly that balloon to not go ahead and test the case out.
space is 60 miles straight up. 100000 ft is around 19 miles. It would have reached terminal velocity by the time it fell 400-450 feet. if you dropped it off of a skyscraper it would have been the same effect -.-
But you would have to make a much thicker case because their is no way the iPad could take that kind of fall even with a case and what is the point unless you where in a plane crash and the iPad fell out of the plane and hit the ground you would be dead or walking around for days just to find the fucking to find out it can't Connect
Christian Hannappel Actually if you dropped it off of a skyscraper it might break because it seems like the bar holding the camera and balloon took most of the impact from that fall and not the iPad
That would require it to have gone into actual space. Which is quite a bit beyond 100k feet. 330k feet; 100km is the international definition of 'the edge of space.' So you're only about 1/3 of the way there at 100k feet. Not really close to the 'edge of space.' Therefore, not going to reach re-entry speed, due to air friction slowing the object; and thus no plasma trail of melting iPad. The reason things burn when coming back from space is due to sudden increase of friction while moving at high speed. The temperature spike is due to the lack of friction in the upper reaches of the atmosphere increasing the terminal velocity of an object to levels that would seem obscene in atmospheric conditions, followed by an exponential scaling in atmospheric density and thus friction. what-if.xkcd.com/58/
Matthew - that's not why things burn up. It has nothing to do with friction, nor a sudden increase in something else. You don't have to go to space, then "reenter" the atmosphere to burn up. You are correct in that a high rate of _speed_ is need, but that's it. The speed of sound is the speed at which air molecules propagate their motion into adjacent molecules, etc. Objects traveling many times the speed of sound are going so fast that the air itself cannot get out of the way, and it compresses so much that it actually generates a great amount of heat. THIS is what creates the reentry effects; not friction. All you need is speed. Not a sudden change in anything.
You didn't have to throw it from space... You just had to throw it from a point where it would reach terminal velocity. After that, the rest of the distance is pretty much nothing.
Calling this bull. Firstly, 100,000 feet is not the edge of space. Hardly near it. Secondly, the pressure difference, if it would have reached the edge, will totally obliterate the liquid crystal solution of the screen (different pressure = different boiling points). Falling from that hight would have vaporised the pad as soon as it hit the ground, scattering its components in a few hundred meter radius. Near the end of the vid there is obviously some there that slows down the fall, most likely a parachute. If this really survived the fall in the way you claim, why don't you already have a job at NASA or ESA developing emergency capsules?
No actually it would only burn if dropped from the exosphere but rather it was dropped from the sratosphere which didn't give it enough speed to begin to burn up and it's actually less than 100,000 feet the stratosphere is actually only 60,000 feet (11 miles). So I'm dirty but you have been proven completely wrong and your argument is now invalid.
Do these guys realise that once something hits terminal velocity it doesn't go any faster? Dropping it from the edge of space gives it the exact same speed as dropping it from an airplane, or everest, depending on the air resistance. Regardless, its still an impressive video, mostly due to the GoPro. They should have let the ipad film as well :)
There is regulations in place that must be fallowed and i beloved you have to file something with the FDA before launch to avoid any issues with Aircraft colliding with it
Once it reaches terminal velocity it can't get faster, if it reaches that at 1,000 feet it doesnt matter how many feet further up it is it can not get faster.
danielfittonxoxo not in that altitude... Remember Felix Baumgartner broke sound barrier when he jumped from 127000 ft. Of course it slows down then but there are other factors like low temperature and pressure. I would expect the battery to be ripped apart.
VideoSins, I guess. 1. You should be proud of the camera not the iPad. **ding** 2. This has no point if you put a case over it. **ding** 3. 100,000 isn't the edge of space. **ding** 4. The grass cushioned its fall. **ding** Sin count: 4 Sentence: "100,000 feet is _NOT_ the edge of space"
It's basically when the force of drag caused by air friction equals the force of the earths gravity pulling on the object. The object at that point has zero acceleration which means it will move at a constant speed. The object of course has to be in free fall, if you shoot something down it will obviously exceed it's terminal velocity, but that means that the object is experiencing declaration since the force of the air resistance on the object is so much bigger than the only thing pulling it towards earth - gravity. My statement is a tad bit generalizing since terminal velocity changes as you descend through the atmosphere (air density increases), so at first it would move a lot faster, but it would start to slow down. But the point stands, if they would have dropped it from about a hundred meters over the same spot it landed, it would hit the ground at exactly the same speed as it did when they dropped it from 11 kilometers. I'm a psychology student otherwise so I'm not really the to go person for physics lol, just read up on in on Wikipedia if you feel like knowing the more complex mechanics.
They use fish eye lenses in order to make the earth appear round. That's the only reason these camera's exist because people use them for stuff like this.
I fail to see how this is possible, the case on that Ipad seems just too thin to have that much capacity for impact absorbtion. I beleive they may have replaced the Ipad after the fall with a new, unbroken one. I also think that if the a Ipad had landed on its screen that it would have been completely shattered, as clearly the screen is not very protected. (A film for anti-scratch at most that I can see) Plus, the heavy mount and shape of the mount seems to have rotated the Ipad as it fell so that the mount for the metal rod absorbed most of the impact. Most people do not have mounts on their Ipads when they drop them from 90,000 feet every day.
well, that is partially true my friend. that would happen if we neglected air resistance and other friction forces. but every object has it's terminal velocity, once the falling "force" and the drag force from the falling force is equal, it cannot get faster anymore... sorry if I defined something wrong, what would you expect from a high school freshman? :D
Daniel Li okay, thats one way. But No force, that slows down the iPad can stop the acceleration process. Only if the force is forcing against earths gravity. Sorry if i spelled stuff wrong and stuff, but i am from germany.. and i usually do physics in germen ^^
Nein, als das iPad die Atmosphäre eintretet, dann wird das iPad um Luftwiderstand ausgesetzt. :D Ich wurde in Ungarn geschult von der ersten bis achten Klasse :D dort habe ich Deutsch gelernt
All of you replyiers are full of crap, The commentator is right, It's called Terminal Velocity, which an actual human can reach by falling from the Empire State slightly before falling.
DETAILS OF THE FALL- (repost since people are still arguing over it) The iPad fell from about 100,000 or 30500m (meters). This definitely gives it enough time and distance to reach terminal velocity. The iPad surface area is 44,790mm squared. We will add some because of the mounting bracket and the camera and all of that. So we will make it 50,000mm squared. The acceleration of Gravity is 9.80665 m/s/s (or meters per second squared). Using [v=sqrt{2gd}], it's speed in m/s (meters per second) is 773.438. Now this doesn't take surface area into account. Because this gives us a speed of about 1730mph. That is over mach 2 and is outrageous. So we will disregard this calculation entirely. Drag coefficient is calculated by the shape of the object. The object a rectangular prism, but the bag it is in provides some angles. So does the cylindrical mounting bracket. And the camera is kind of a square, so the average drag coeffient of all three of these shapes (and we will add a bit to compensate for the popped balloon) comes out to be about 1.5. Vterminal=sqrt{(2*mass*gravity)/(density of air*projected area*drag coefficient)} Average air density~ 1.3 kg/m cubed Mass= .73 kg Drag Coefficient~ 1.5 Projected area= 50000mm squared Accel due to gravity= 9.80665m/s/s The answer comes out to be 10.2417 m/s. When converted into mph, it equates to a speed of 27.11mph. Looking at the footage, that seems about right.
Matt Hilbert Yeah, I've seen the tables. Just wondering how you settled on 1.5. I don't necessarily disagree. When I made the original comment, I didn't see where you justified using 1.5 in your original comment.
1. Title needs fixing. Stop making ridiculous claims, 100000 feet is still in the upper atmosphere. 2. There's some sort of editing trickery at 1:44, the playback speed has been altered in order to trick the viewer. Even though there is no clear boundry to where space begin, according to Fédération Aéronautique Internationale, the association that determines these things - the Karman line (visit your local library to find out more) is at 100 km or 62 miles for the metricly impaired. 100000 feet is just short of 19 miles, nowhere near the "edge of space" as claimed in the title. Furthermore, had the ipad been brought up to the actual edge of space the atmosphere would be so thin that the liquid in the LCD screen would boil off, rendering the device unusable.
thats cuz the sped up the video because who would want to watch a still video while the guy tries to find the ipad. they sped it up in the end until he found it.
Chocolatebics 1. No need to use foul language, even if it's in abbreviated form. 2. The altitude at which the item was dropped is pretty much irrelevant as long as terminal velocity is reached. In this case, and for the sake of argument, lets say a couple hundred feet at the most. You might as well conduct this "experiment" by dropping the ipad from the roof of a sky scraper, call it "edge of space", and get the exact same result. 3. Actually it does detract from the video since had it actually been the edge of space then the iPad would no longer function and the dubious claim by the maker of this video would be rendered null and void. There is such a thing as truth in advertisement, the fact that these boozos have thrown caution to the wind is no excuse.
BigBrotherMateyka I think this is an ad for the protective casing, so putting the ipad in the casing to protect it was kind of the entire point of the video
Me thinks that they attached the GoPro and the pole to the iPad to add an additional point for which to hit the ground and reduce the force on the iPad
Screw parachutes, just put some crappy material around our astronaughts and let them fall from space back to earth, 100% guaranteed safety or your life back!
An astronaut wont fall back om his/her own. He would need to slow down enough to get into the the thicker portions of the atmosphere and slow down. Remember that there is gravity everywhere and the reason astronauts is staying in orbit is because its traveling so fast horizontaly
So your telling me... A iPad with millions of layers with rubber in it survives a fall.. But a gopro attached onto a metal stick with a plastic case can survive a fall like that?
It is not that big of a deal. The iPad (and contraption it was attached to - including the GoPro) most certainly only hit the ground at terminal velocity, and it isn't all that fast for this rig. It could have been dropped from 50-60 feet and it would not have hit any softer.
Willoughby Krenzteinburg I completely agree watching this i was thinking that from the get go when he said "We're gonna drop it from 100,000 ft." Just fucking launch it from a building. this is one of those companies that are gonna benefit from pure idiots.
cody collier It never went faster than its terminal velocity. That is nowhere near fast enough to 'be in pieces'. As far as the velocity at which it impacts the ground....no - things do not hit any faster the higher up you go. You need to read up on terminal velocity.
any object droped in air it will reach specific velocity and stops accelerating its Maximium speed depends on its Mass Gravity Friction even its Shape You dont need to send it to space or 30 km high you can calculate the hight needed for the ipad air to reach its maximium speed Regards all
My sister dropped her iPad off a kitchen counter onto a tile floor. It had a protective case around it, which helped it survive many times (especially edge drops). This time the iPad impacted on such an angle that sent enough of a shock wave to crack the screen. It is possible that this iPad survived the fall at terminal velocity if it struck at the right angles. Otherwise, the screen would have shattered. Nothing can make the glass more tolerable to shock... except if Apple spent a little more money and made the glass more shatter resistant. But they'd rather make money off of broken screens. It's a real racket.
The glass on Apple devices break more regularly than, say, the Samsung Galaxy S4, true, but it's because the glass has been hardened to prevent scratches, not because Apple want to make an extra buck on broken screens. Remember, other phones (I compare it to the Samsung Galaxy S4 again) also break easily. A three foot drop would kill most phones with a glass display, depending on the angle in which it hits.
***** I'm sorry, my mistake for not catching the fact that this ipad never left the atmosphere. However, whether it had a titanium hard case or not, it should have broken after falling from a few THOUSAND feet. If someone can be flattened by falling from a building that is just over a thousand feet tall, then this ipad should be broken.
My friends iPad fell 5 inches from the ground and cracked... But I guess it TOTALLY makes sense that if you drop it like a million feet high in the air it won't crack a bit... W.O.W
it would matter, if it actually went to the edge of space, the atmosphere would have been so low and the pressure difference would have been so high that any liquid LCD in the iPad would have melted and made the iPad unusable
Foxynerf does minecraft oh so you try to say that any thing falling from space with like 200/300 km/ph won't brake but something that falls from 5 feet does? o_o?
fake 1:44 you can see the clouds moving really fast then they slow down. maybe they did get it into space and back down but they used some kind of parachute before it hit the ground. you can tell they sped up the shot because the clouds move really fast then slow down abruptly
Ipad:doesn't break when falling from 100,000 ft Iphone 6: Breaks when you bend it just a little too much. Yeah I am calling bs on this unless that case is god and Apple got a major quality downgrade.
dude the iphone 6 only bends if you push to hard on it there was even a offical video were they tested it and the iphone stood up to 90 punds AND YES I KNOW HORRIBLE SPELLING IM TO LAZY TO FIX
Jad Ayash It makes you seem like you are a whole lot younger than you really are, and it makes you seem stupid, take the time to solve the word crime my friend.
Lol dropped my iPad 18 stories and it survived... But I do know people who dropped it a foot and it shattered, but now there's space... Lmaooo fuck logic xD
well not exactly. Felix baughmer or whatever his last name was jumped around that hight. The helium balloon pops just before reaching the tip of the atmosphere where it would burn up.
When objects fly through the vacuum of space they can be travelling at tens of thousands of miles an hour so when it hits the atmosphere it compresses the gases in front of it with in turn causes heat. The iPad's terminal velocity is not fast enough to cause that to happen.
This is obviously fake, if something dropped from the height with nothing to slow it down,(like a parachute) it would simply make a dent in the ground or of course burn up in the atmosphere. So don’t gets thoughts that this is a real video. Edit:Oh! Forgot to say that a iPad would go passed the speed of sound so it would burn like I said above, but I forgot to mention the hardware in the device would break apart and crash out through the screen of the iPad. It would go through the screen first because it easier, similar to a garage door in a hurricane. It is easy for the hurricane to get the garage first so it will get it first. And it landed in rocks and not a single DENT OR SCRATCH
It has air to slow it down. It would go no faster than its terminal velocity. It would not burn up. You need to educate yourself on why things burn up in the atmosphere. Something just simply falling will never be going fast enough to come anywhere close to the speeds necessary to cause that kind of heating.
![Felix Baumgartner Space Jump World Record 2012 Full HD 1080p [FULL]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vvbN-cWe0A0/mqdefault.jpg)
it's on Airplane Mode
+preston richards XDDD
;)
Thank you.
+Helmi Khalish Helium Balloon Mode
+Helmi Khalish Beltin'!
Must of been an iPad Air
Good one.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+Adinator mmm that was good
Delicious
lol I get it
+Adinator hahahaha
and my phone breaks when I drop it from my hand
Enrico Rocca ikr
Enrico Rocca really true
marcel cervenak evrey case is breakable so I don't no if I believe this video???
Lol everyday 5 phones get dropped in 1 minute
@@myshrekistheonly way more
A fucking ipad drops from SPACE and the screen doesn't have a single crack, my iphone drops from my pocket and the screen looks like it was tossed inside a blender.
+Saws Baws Did you purchased it from China?
LOGIC.....
Did you bought it from planet Virginia?
hahah lol
Saws Baws your comment made my day
Imagine if it pops and then falls into someone's back yard - They'll think the ipad is a gift from God.
Or fell in the Australian outback where they've never seen an iPad before. "The Gods Must Be Crazy".
Jack Flash Its only one God not the gods
laughingturtle900 stfu christian ass birch
laughingturtle900 it has one God?
Aboudi
Is something wrong with being a Christian? Because I believe it is not a problem
We tried this with my little brother, I forgot to put tracker to it and now my little brother is lost somewhere :(
lol
You sure he survived?? 😂😂
😂
Omg lol I hope he survives 😂😂😂
XD
It's an IPad AIR!
Its not funny any more
the pun is getting old bruh
+Adam Aitmouha So is "bruh".
Lmao good one
hehe that's funny
A gopro also fell from space and survived.
magic 😀
they replaced it off camera
because of the cover its survive did you now
teehee why isn't he worried there is gonna be planes coming
Liane Nicole almonte
imagine how mad someone would be, just taking a walk on a nice, beautiful day, and an ipad falls on their head.
Their* but yeah 😂
;) sorry...
They would die XD because it has lost of speed
*lots
So true
falls from space: survive falls from hand: crack
***** ahh
***** What makes you think it won't go faster than 9.81 m/s? You wouldn't happen to be confusing terminal velocity with the gravitational force for Earth at sea level of ~9.81 m/s^2 would you?
Acceleration and velocity are not one and the same, although they are related. The acceleration you keep talking about is measured in meters per second squared, or meters per second per second, (m/s^2) which describes how fast an object will change its velocity (speed up or slow down). Velocity (sometimes mistakenly referred to as speed but close enough for this discussion) on the other hand, is measured in meters per second (m/s). Terminal velocity is the velocity at which an object experiences the same acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2) as the acceleration due to friction (air resistance in this case) in the opposite direction. Terminal velocity for any given object could be almost 0 m/s for something like a grain of dust to thousands of m/s for say a telephone pole made of depleted uranium with fins to keep it pointed downward (not your every day object but as an example, it would fall hella' fast). I would estimate the terminal velocity for an iPad is 20-30 m/s based only on a barely intuitive guess.
***** I realize this is the internet, and we are supposed to be negative and critical of everything, but if they were going to fake this wouldn't it be easier to just film the recovery first, or use 2 iPads? Building a super iPad with thicker glass and metal seems like a much harder task. And yes, it was "inside a rubber", the whole point was to demonstrate the case is durable. Can't do that without putting it in a case.
falls on concrete: couple of scratches falls on carpet: dents and cracks
You do know things reach terminal velocity right? The iPad only goes down so fast then it stops speeding up.
Exactly what I was thinking
obviously. if it didn't those guys would get dinosaured.
P A X X what does that even mean
it means what it means.
P A X X ahhh got it, blowdeded up by meaty oars
It survived!!!
*presses home button
*breaks into 100,000,000 pieces
The Gaming Player mmm
10crore
The Gaming Player I
lol ttrue
If it landed Screen first it would of been decimated
it survived because it was on airplane mode
SEE WHAT I DID THERE
I get it :)
Well played. Well played.
Yingyyang AJ LOL good one Mate good one.
GG M8 8/8 - IGN
Yingyyang AJ xD
Calling this bull.
Firstly, 100,000 feet is *not* the edge of space. Hardly near it.
Secondly, the pressure difference, if it *would* have reached the edge, will totally obliterate the liquid crystal solution of the screen (different pressure = different boiling points).
Falling from that hight would have vaporised the pad as soon as it hit the ground, scattering its components in a few hundred meter radius. Near the end of the vid there is obviously some there that slows down the fall, most likely a parachute.
If this really survived the fall in the way you claim, why don't you already have a job at NASA or ESA developing emergency capsules?
How do you know he doesn't work at NASA
Hosterofdarest ! you really are a dumbass arent you? FACTS OFFICIAL WEBSITE WE HAVE PROOF you dont have to be a nasa pilot to use common sense
Hosterofdarest ! I would've used a bit different wording than Mike Chapman here; but yes, they don't work for NASA, otherwise this would be part of one of their tech videos, and the "equipment" would have NASA logo's plastered all over it. At least one of them would've said something about NASA.
The edge of space is 62 miles up, leaving this at 1/3 of that height, so the claim is not too deceptive. Additionally the fall from space if it were at 62 miles would result in the same end as the current video since it is almost certain that the iPad + camera contraption was traveling at terminal velocity when it hit the ground. It wouldn't have been vaporized or have hit the ground at crazy speeds. However, if it were traveling at orbital speeds and then re-entered, it would be a charred mess by the time it hit the ground.
Mamoru Daichi My point.
Drop an iPad from space, doesn't even have a scratch...
Drop it out of your hands from 2-3 feet in the air, pretty much shatters in pieces...
Apple products everybody..! 😂
+Sophisicated Seagull NAWLIDGE!!!!!!!
😂😂
+Zach lovett yup... Its wrapped in a one inch thick piece of foam... Its being dropped from space, that thing shouldve shattered
+Caden Koetje
The point of this video is to show off the _CASE_ around the iPad, not the iPad itself.
If an iPad without the case fell from the edges of space, it would _literally_ shatter if it didn't start melting from the atmospheric drag.
+MGS Lurmey no it would not melt
*Drops I pad from 3ft and shatters screen & insides*
Try 30000 ft next time
iPad*
Be careful because I tried this & an Alien stole mine from the upper Ether, & AppleCare were reluctant to cover me :-(
haha
+Markopoi ayy lmao
lmao hahahah
When I tried this from my secret fortress on a planet in another galaxy, a species of talking birds more annoying than Kaepora Gaebora found it and interpreted it as a declaration of war.
ShynAwkward sorry it looked interesting (also it had RUclips )
Next time drop a Nokia from space
Pretty sure that would cause an earthquake
No, that would cause almost every living thing that exists today to go extinct.
Like the dinosaurs.
+shadowfox105870 Yeah or throw it at the sun. Will end all life as we know it
+alexthegrape1000 u made my day
+shadowfox105870 Nokia joke will never get sick of XD
next time drop a flat earther
theres their prove haha
Adromedox Seriously? the Earth is obviously a Rhombus...
*Falls into ocean*
Stupid reply section, it is obviously made out of *LEGO SHAPED RECTANGLES*
@@pepsizer6069 rhombus? Are you serious?!? The earth is a *RAPTOR* !!
Man: I broke my IPad can you fix it
Apple employee: How did it break?
Man: i sent it into space and let it fall back to me
Apple employee: Sir are you sober?
If you think about it, regardless of high it falls the terminal velocity would be achieved in a couple hundred feet, thus making to difference to the fall.
much science wow, exciting
you are copying my pic
Algren Alcalde Or maybe, Shahzad just found some photo on the internet, cropped to the square, and it happens you guys have the same...
Algren Alcalde You Cen Se Mi Saxy Bady. , a i m a smart gy an i tak physics in collage. i hav almos major in neur 0 l o gie.
Shahzad Khan nice grammer
What's the point if they protect it with a case? Sigh.
Correction: What's the point of dropping an ipad from the space ._.
mathrocker experimental correction. Whats the point of buying iphone when u dont want it
Ada Liu correction: i love potatoes
correction: i love chicken
Ada Liu Correction they dropped "AN" iPad.
How the fuck does iPad survive drop from space but when it slips from my hands it shatters into pieces
Also how did the camera not break
oh
It's got a tough case on it,you can't buy.You can put tablet in there at it will survive.
Cause you are a frog.duh.
Probobly you dropped it while you were jumping.duh
And then it downloaded an OS update and broke.
Dropping an ipad from the space = Survives.
Dropping an iPad form the table = Dead.
It has armor u dumbass
Lol
well said
***** dats gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8 no h8 carries some w8 to it yknow?
We need to start building higher tables
it can survive 100,000ft but it cant survive a table?
marketing man.
This video is pretty funny since it is in this big protective casing.
That is like saying "Man falls from orbit and survives!" (with parachute)
Matt B Yeah, and that's the entire point. The entire video is an ADVERTISEMENT for the case. That's some good paying attention there!
Willoughby Krenzteinburg I am aware of this, I was speaking of the practicality of it. That is good paying attention there champ. :)
Matt B
That doesn't even make sense. I'm not buying it.
Willoughby Krenzteinburg I am saying that the way they dropped the ipad is not realistic or practical to how the ipad itself can actually stay together, I am aware and am not concerned about the advertisment.
It is a fucking commercial for the. Case dumbass
and this is how newton discovered gravity when an APPLE fall on his head :D
The movie's "still playing"? From what I saw, the movie was showing the opening Disney logo when they checked it. It would be a HUGE coincidence if, on repeat, it took it the exact movie time to go up and back down. This opens up the possibility that they just switched out the one that potentially broke from re-entry, and switched it for a new one.
I call fake.
ALSO, it's funny that we actually never see an actual iPad in the case while it's in the air.
Re-entry? It NEVER left the atmosphere! lol They sure would have wasted a lot of money to get a permit from the FAA to fly that balloon to not go ahead and test the case out.
Micha Seals They would get that money back by selling iPad cases advertised in this video.
I'm still wondering how the Go-pro survived the fall, anyone?
***** Hey, I'm not calling you an idiot. I's just speculating here. Just because someone likes Minecraft doesn't make me an idiot.
ive droped an ipad from less them 2 feet amd the scrren cracks
Tim T Yes this video is a fake, watch to the "case", it's yellow, when they find it the ipad hasn't got any cases
No it's not fake it's a commercial for the iPad case
Kevin stage you are really ducking stupid
well it landed on its back and they had a fucking case, its like saying MAN FALLS 30000 FT AND LIVES (with a parachute
+Daniel Ely wrong it's landed on the screen (1:45 sky left ) and when he pick it up it was on his back (1:55 sky right )
^^
Yet when my IPod falls two feet off the side table in my uncle's guest room, almost all of the screen is shattered.
lmao story of my life
ikr
if it survived that why did mine crack when i dropped it on grass
It had a case
Haha
ur every where!!
It had like a 2 inch case.
haha geez
last time somebody dropped a nokia from that high all the dinosaurs died.
Well now at least if I drop my ipad from the space station it'l be okay.
It was going at terminal velocity either way.
***** Bro I was jk
holy shit man ctfo
flagging.
I love your picture. Love daft punk!!
space is 60 miles straight up. 100000 ft is around 19 miles. It would have reached terminal velocity by the time it fell 400-450 feet. if you dropped it off of a skyscraper it would have been the same effect -.-
I'm glad at least someone mentioned it. Dropping the ipad from 100k feet makes no sense whatsoever. I guess that's just for the dramatic effect of it.
Also they had a protective case around it
But you would have to make a much thicker case because their is no way the iPad could take that kind of fall even with a case and what is the point unless you where in a plane crash and the iPad fell out of the plane and hit the ground you would be dead or walking around for days just to find the fucking to find out it can't Connect
ksizzle6789 That was the point of the video listen to what he says at 00:16
Christian Hannappel Actually if you dropped it off of a skyscraper it might break because it seems like the bar holding the camera and balloon took most of the impact from that fall and not the iPad
Ipad falling from space = no cracks
Ipad falling from ur hand = Plasma explotion
This bird bit me, so I took it and tied it to one of those balloon things, and launched it to the edge of space.
Its wearher balloon :)
Are you fucking serious.
No lol.
I really love people who makes jokes, props to u man! Ps made me laugh very badly and my side is very painful
What's your avi from??
Should be more proud of the go pro lol. Looked like it didnt have any fancy caseing lol
True
Lol he had a water proof case on it 📹📱
-_-
fail
i dropped my gopro 4 with no case into the bathtub on accident whilst recording and i dried it in rice and it works fine lmao
◄●●Snoogleberry1●●► why the f**k would you take a go pro into the bath with you???
I was expecting it to burn as it was coming down to earth. Anyone else?
it would have to go at a REALLY fast speed for it to burn...
you man re-entry?
That would require it to have gone into actual space. Which is quite a bit beyond 100k feet. 330k feet; 100km is the international definition of 'the edge of space.' So you're only about 1/3 of the way there at 100k feet. Not really close to the 'edge of space.' Therefore, not going to reach re-entry speed, due to air friction slowing the object; and thus no plasma trail of melting iPad. The reason things burn when coming back from space is due to sudden increase of friction while moving at high speed. The temperature spike is due to the lack of friction in the upper reaches of the atmosphere increasing the terminal velocity of an object to levels that would seem obscene in atmospheric conditions, followed by an exponential scaling in atmospheric density and thus friction. what-if.xkcd.com/58/
Matthew - that's not why things burn up. It has nothing to do with friction, nor a sudden increase in something else. You don't have to go to space, then "reenter" the atmosphere to burn up. You are correct in that a high rate of _speed_ is need, but that's it.
The speed of sound is the speed at which air molecules propagate their motion into adjacent molecules, etc. Objects traveling many times the speed of sound are going so fast that the air itself cannot get out of the way, and it compresses so much that it actually generates a great amount of heat. THIS is what creates the reentry effects; not friction. All you need is speed. Not a sudden change in anything.
Willoughby Krenzteinburg the heat is generated by the speed of the air molecules passing the object. Also known as friction.
Astronaughts be like: "Shit! I dropped the Ipad!"
That would burn up on re-entry
+Edward Zondi Or slow down before that could happen. Just saying, it's somewhat light with a large surface area.
+Edward Zondi Wouldn't even re-enter the atmosphere for quite some time, it would just float lol
kenkade4 be like: raywilliamfuckingjhonson
hahahahhah im laughing crying hahahah
You didn't have to throw it from space... You just had to throw it from a point where it would reach terminal velocity. After that, the rest of the distance is pretty much nothing.
Its called advertising tactics so stop criticizing
@@jungwoo97 stop crying Wong Shan xiaoaoaoaoai
Calling this bull.
Firstly, 100,000 feet is not the edge of space. Hardly near it.
Secondly, the pressure difference, if it would have reached the edge, will totally obliterate the liquid crystal solution of the screen (different pressure = different boiling points).
Falling from that hight would have vaporised the pad as soon as it hit the ground, scattering its components in a few hundred meter radius. Near the end of the vid there is obviously some there that slows down the fall, most likely a parachute.
If this really survived the fall in the way you claim, why don't you already have a job at NASA or ESA developing emergency capsules?
Trevor Wilson good job, you can use copy and paste.
Jude Floyd lol
Jude Floyd I know
No actually it would only burn if dropped from the exosphere but rather it was dropped from the sratosphere which didn't give it enough speed to begin to burn up and it's actually less than 100,000 feet the stratosphere is actually only 60,000 feet (11 miles). So I'm dirty but you have been proven completely wrong and your argument is now invalid.
*sorry
Bull shit I dropped my iPad from 30 centimetres from the ground and it disintegrated
good shit
+Peter James Lee You mean cracked? iPads don't disintegrate, and you probably didn't even have a case on, which is why it "disintegrated."
lol just the way u worded it was funny
Lol 😁
+Peter James Lee 30cm(1foot) and disintegration occurred??? RIIIIGHTTT!!!!
Mine died just from dropping down the table, tho.
JOhn Doe
JOhn Doe your dumb.it had like a 2 inch thick case.
Islom Nosirov
*you're
Do these guys realise that once something hits terminal velocity it doesn't go any faster? Dropping it from the edge of space gives it the exact same speed as dropping it from an airplane, or everest, depending on the air resistance. Regardless, its still an impressive video, mostly due to the GoPro. They should have let the ipad film as well :)
Bomberman Then it will slow down when it hits lower hights, right? but this method is sure to keep the maximum speed nevertheless
Last time i checked it's pretty illegal to send those tings up in the air.
Christopher Rautenbach Keep your smile :)
Christopher Rautenbach what is the use of telling someone that you don't know to kill themself? Get a life.
Yeetdominations // Jake Shayke Exactly
Jacøb Flisberg serac eno on
There is regulations in place that must be fallowed and i beloved you have to file something with the FDA before launch to avoid any issues with Aircraft colliding with it
Once it reaches terminal velocity it can't get faster, if it reaches that at 1,000 feet it doesnt matter how many feet further up it is it can not get faster.
danielfittonxoxo I learned something new today.
danielfittonxoxo not in that altitude... Remember Felix Baumgartner broke sound barrier when he jumped from 127000 ft. Of course it slows down then but there are other factors like low temperature and pressure. I would expect the battery to be ripped apart.
danielfittonxoxo Yes it can could have went faster. strap some rockets to it and use Thrust
use Force
Do you know how dinosaurs were wiped out?
Someone tried this with a Nokia 3310.
VideoSins, I guess.
1. You should be proud of the camera not the iPad. **ding**
2. This has no point if you put a case over it. **ding**
3. 100,000 isn't the edge of space. **ding**
4. The grass cushioned its fall. **ding**
Sin count: 4
Sentence: "100,000 feet is _NOT_ the edge of space"
***** True...
Nerd-Bird You forgot all the "dings".
***** Just edited it. XD
5.It needed more boosters. *ding*
6. If the iPad was dropped from REAL space it would have burned up upon collision with the atmosphere.
*ding*
It's basically pointless from what height you drop it, as long as it's enough to reach its terminal velocity lol.
hahaha your right
Whats terminal velocity :) Im taking physics right now and its really interesting
It's basically when the force of drag caused by air friction equals the force of the earths gravity pulling on the object. The object at that point has zero acceleration which means it will move at a constant speed. The object of course has to be in free fall, if you shoot something down it will obviously exceed it's terminal velocity, but that means that the object is experiencing declaration since the force of the air resistance on the object is so much bigger than the only thing pulling it towards earth - gravity.
My statement is a tad bit generalizing since terminal velocity changes as you descend through the atmosphere (air density increases), so at first it would move a lot faster, but it would start to slow down. But the point stands, if they would have dropped it from about a hundred meters over the same spot it landed, it would hit the ground at exactly the same speed as it did when they dropped it from 11 kilometers.
I'm a psychology student otherwise so I'm not really the to go person for physics lol, just read up on in on Wikipedia if you feel like knowing the more complex mechanics.
Woah thanks man, now i can sound smart in class ;) LOL
Eh this is pretty basic stuff lol
This sounds like something TechRax would do
With an iPhone
look prove that the earth is not flat 1:08 take that flat earth society
lol - look at 1:34 .. the earth is CONCAVE !!! (ooops.. might be caused by the fish-eye lens)
They use fish eye lenses in order to make the earth appear round. That's the only reason these camera's exist because people use them for stuff like this.
lol k
Helena and Joe.. How do you live in such a delusional little world.
explain why there isn't any footage that doesn't use fish eye lenses then
I fail to see how this is possible, the case on that Ipad seems just too thin to have that much capacity for impact absorbtion. I beleive they may have replaced the Ipad after the fall with a new, unbroken one.
I also think that if the a Ipad had landed on its screen that it would have been completely shattered, as clearly the screen is not very protected. (A film for anti-scratch at most that I can see)
Plus, the heavy mount and shape of the mount seems to have rotated the Ipad as it fell so that the mount for the metal rod absorbed most of the impact. Most people do not have mounts on their Ipads when they drop them from 90,000 feet every day.
Clearly fake because there was a film playing yet it had only started when he shows you the ipad
But there no wifi in space
John, he probably downloaded it.
Paul, sometimes the title comes after the movie start
No, Paul. They edited the clips of the intro and the camera, Plus this is probably the most honest channels.
The iPad can have its own Internet
So it fell back only 78 feet away from when originally launched, even with all of the earth turning and spinning, it makes total sense doesn't it.
yeah it didn't go that high
At least i know next time my iPad decides to fly up to space it will survive.
it more or less the fact it survived the cold temperatures and near vacuum conditions.
After a certain height it doesn't matter anymore how tall it falls from, because it already reached it's final velocity...
Thats not true! It always speeds up.
well, that is partially true my friend. that would happen if we neglected air resistance and other friction forces. but every object has it's terminal velocity, once the falling "force" and the drag force from the falling force is equal, it cannot get faster anymore...
sorry if I defined something wrong, what would you expect from a high school freshman? :D
Daniel Li okay, thats one way. But No force, that slows down the iPad can stop the acceleration process. Only if the force is forcing against earths gravity.
Sorry if i spelled stuff wrong and stuff, but i am from germany.. and i usually do physics in germen ^^
Nein, als das iPad die Atmosphäre eintretet, dann wird das iPad um Luftwiderstand ausgesetzt. :D
Ich wurde in Ungarn geschult von der ersten bis achten Klasse :D dort habe ich Deutsch gelernt
All of you replyiers are full of crap, The commentator is right, It's called Terminal Velocity, which an actual human can reach by falling from the Empire State slightly before falling.
DETAILS OF THE FALL- (repost since people are still arguing over it)
The iPad fell from about 100,000 or 30500m (meters). This definitely gives it enough time and distance to reach terminal velocity.
The iPad surface area is 44,790mm squared. We will add some because of the mounting bracket and the camera and all of that. So we will make it 50,000mm squared.
The acceleration of Gravity is 9.80665 m/s/s (or meters per second squared). Using [v=sqrt{2gd}], it's speed in m/s (meters per second) is 773.438. Now this doesn't take surface area into account. Because this gives us a speed of about 1730mph. That is over mach 2 and is outrageous. So we will disregard this calculation entirely.
Drag coefficient is calculated by the shape of the object. The object a rectangular prism, but the bag it is in provides some angles. So does the cylindrical mounting bracket. And the camera is kind of a square, so the average drag coeffient of all three of these shapes (and we will add a bit to compensate for the popped balloon) comes out to be about 1.5.
Vterminal=sqrt{(2*mass*gravity)/(density of air*projected area*drag coefficient)}
Average air density~ 1.3 kg/m cubed
Mass= .73 kg
Drag Coefficient~ 1.5
Projected area= 50000mm squared
Accel due to gravity= 9.80665m/s/s
The answer comes out to be 10.2417 m/s. When converted into mph, it equates to a speed of 27.11mph. Looking at the footage, that seems about right.
your smart
How did you figure the drag coefficient?
There have been tests that have classified certain shapes as having a certain drag coefficient
Matt Hilbert Yeah, I've seen the tables. Just wondering how you settled on 1.5. I don't necessarily disagree. When I made the original comment, I didn't see where you justified using 1.5 in your original comment.
Oh, ok. I see. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
my friend: “ don’t fall for them “ me: 1:23
Who cares about the iPad, the GoPro just did that fall and survived without any 50 kg case...
1. Title needs fixing. Stop making ridiculous claims, 100000 feet is still in the upper atmosphere.
2. There's some sort of editing trickery at 1:44, the playback speed has been altered in order to trick the viewer.
Even though there is no clear boundry to where space begin, according to Fédération Aéronautique Internationale, the association that determines these things - the Karman line (visit your local library to find out more) is at 100 km or 62 miles for the metricly impaired.
100000 feet is just short of 19 miles, nowhere near the "edge of space" as claimed in the title.
Furthermore, had the ipad been brought up to the actual edge of space the atmosphere would be so thin that the liquid in the LCD screen would boil off, rendering the device unusable.
Why would i visit my local library to learn more??? Im already on my computer lol...
thats cuz the sped up the video because who would want to watch a still video while the guy tries to find the ipad. they sped it up in the end until he found it.
Tahlia S
1. "cuz" is not a word.
2. You're basing your statement on what, exactly?
stfu it was still dropped from pretty high and it being not dropped from 'the edge of space' doesn't really detract from the video
Chocolatebics
1. No need to use foul language, even if it's in abbreviated form.
2. The altitude at which the item was dropped is pretty much irrelevant as long as terminal velocity is reached. In this case, and for the sake of argument, lets say a couple hundred feet at the most.
You might as well conduct this "experiment" by dropping the ipad from the roof of a sky scraper, call it "edge of space", and get the exact same result.
3. Actually it does detract from the video since had it actually been the edge of space then the iPad would no longer function and the dubious claim by the maker of this video would be rendered null and void.
There is such a thing as truth in advertisement, the fact that these boozos have thrown caution to the wind is no excuse.
Pointless really as it would only fall at terminal velocity so didn't have to go that high tbh
I was going to say exactly the same thing. why go that high when you could reach terminal velocity at a lower height? makes no practical sense
+schweddy balls i think they're just trying to impress people who don't know a whole bunch about physics
+schweddy balls well its resistant to the air!
+PAROBI true
It's for views
bullshit, it was way too protected to count. if a bare iPad was dropped from that height, that'd be more telling.
the description says it was in a special case.
you'd be surprised what shock absorbing cases can do
and secondly it drop on grass and dirt not rock.
This is to show off the case, not the iPad! The iPad alone would have been obliterated
It wouldn't matter if it was dropped from that high, it would reach maximum velocity after about 800 feet of falling.
Penguins! Yay!
and still it's terminal velocity would be higher without the case.
Yeah, try it without a protective casing and a parachute.
*THEN* try bothering to impress me.
BigBrotherMateyka I think this is an ad for the protective casing, so putting the ipad in the casing to protect it was kind of the entire point of the video
1. No parachute
2. This was a commercial for the iPad case you fucking dumbass
+SpartaNXGaming man you like to commenting every thing is it because you are adopt
But nobody gives a shit about impressing you! your a nobody
and you are?
the go pro made it without a case....
Me thinks that they attached the GoPro and the pole to the iPad to add an additional point for which to hit the ground and reduce the force on the iPad
I'm more inclined to believe they replaced both devices after they hit the ground then edited the footage so you won't as readily question it.
The last time an iPad dropped from space I killed all the dinosaurs
Ipad dropped from space : nothing happens. Nokia dropped from space : Earth cracks
I've accidentally dropped my iPad from 100,000 feet so I clicked this video to seek help.
Screw parachutes, just put some crappy material around our astronaughts and let them fall from space back to earth, 100% guaranteed safety or your life back!
I love this kinda guy. Meaning I love me.
They would burst to flames because of the pull of the gravity and stuff..
just tape ipads onto him
+Luis Alfonso Beredo why be a buzzkill
An astronaut wont fall back om his/her own. He would need to slow down enough to get into the the thicker portions of the atmosphere and slow down. Remember that there is gravity everywhere and the reason astronauts is staying in orbit is because its traveling so fast horizontaly
Their iPad: Dropped from space still working
My phone: Dies in a 1 meter fall
Why did it matter how high? It reaches terminal velocity so it didn't matter if it fall from space or flying distance
True. I would guess for effect, as Ipad dropped from 20 feet- and survives, would be far less exciting. ;p
So your telling me... A iPad with millions of layers with rubber in it survives a fall.. But a gopro attached onto a metal stick with a plastic case can survive a fall like that?
It is not that big of a deal. The iPad (and contraption it was attached to - including the GoPro) most certainly only hit the ground at terminal velocity, and it isn't all that fast for this rig. It could have been dropped from 50-60 feet and it would not have hit any softer.
Willoughby Krenzteinburg I completely agree watching this i was thinking that from the get go when he said "We're gonna drop it from 100,000 ft." Just fucking launch it from a building. this is one of those companies that are gonna benefit from pure idiots.
Your forgetting though, you hit terminal velocity at about 1500 ft.
Willoughby Krenzteinburg things fall harder and faster the higher you go duh this video must be fake that ipad would be in pieces
cody collier It never went faster than its terminal velocity. That is nowhere near fast enough to 'be in pieces'. As far as the velocity at which it impacts the ground....no - things do not hit any faster the higher up you go. You need to read up on terminal velocity.
the last time someone dropped a Nokia phone from space all the dinosaurs died.
any object droped in air it will reach specific velocity and stops accelerating its Maximium speed depends on its Mass Gravity Friction even its Shape
You dont need to send it to space or 30 km high you can calculate the hight needed for the ipad air to reach its maximium speed
Regards all
Could you please post the entire length video? Thanks.
My sister dropped her iPad off a kitchen counter onto a tile floor. It had a protective case around it, which helped it survive many times (especially edge drops). This time the iPad impacted on such an angle that sent enough of a shock wave to crack the screen.
It is possible that this iPad survived the fall at terminal velocity if it struck at the right angles. Otherwise, the screen would have shattered. Nothing can make the glass more tolerable to shock... except if Apple spent a little more money and made the glass more shatter resistant. But they'd rather make money off of broken screens. It's a real racket.
That happened to me>
The glass on Apple devices break more regularly than, say, the Samsung Galaxy S4, true, but it's because the glass has been hardened to prevent scratches, not because Apple want to make an extra buck on broken screens. Remember, other phones (I compare it to the Samsung Galaxy S4 again) also break easily. A three foot drop would kill most phones with a glass display, depending on the angle in which it hits.
JoeyRamonerulz Amen on that. My Galaxy S4 got updated to the cracked ice version after a two foot fall out of my pocket.
Haha yeah, my friend had that happen to him as well. Personally I've gone for the cracked back iPhone 4S.
Solid. Solid. As long as I don't have the shattered ice version, then I'm fine.
Obviously this is edited. An iPhone was smashed with a hammer and could not survive. So why would an Ipad? It should have caught fire.
Please leave...
It never left the atmoshpere so. NO it shouldn't have caught on fire. But I am still pretty sure there is some trickery here
funster5031 I never said it should have caught on fire, but I am saying this because you out some emphasis on the word "no".
***** I'm sorry, my mistake for not catching the fact that this ipad never left the atmosphere. However, whether it had a titanium hard case or not, it should have broken after falling from a few THOUSAND feet. If someone can be flattened by falling from a building that is just over a thousand feet tall, then this ipad should be broken.
DrSmileyFace18 No, I think I am going to stay
Yet I drop my hand on the case part which isn’t near the iPad and the iPad shatters in pieces...
"Drops and murders a small child."
My friends iPad fell 5 inches from the ground and cracked... But I guess it TOTALLY makes sense that if you drop it like a million feet high in the air it won't crack a bit... W.O.W
It landed on dirt
A million feet high huh?... haha
Potato omg I ate you like 5 minutes ago...
It didn't land on the iPad the tracker took the fall xD
xxMOOxMOOxx thats hot
Fake. I can't even drop my phone 5ft without it breaking in half. I call hax.
They must have had the iPad on airplane mode.
Its Miller Time Loooool.
Yeah, and it's a commercial for the case.
***** I have a case on mine ;-; Apple just hates me :T
Your phone is a piece of shit then.
So you’re telling me when I drop my iPad on the wood floor, it breaks, but somehow it doesn’t break when it falls from space? 🤔
so...if you put a human in a case like that..will they survive
Asking the important questions, here.
3k metres or 30k are the same, as long as it glides horizontally and lands with the sceen up.
exactly terminal velocity is terminal velocity. for an Ipad it's pry 40 mph or less
After about 100 ft the height doesn't matter it has already reached terminal velocity.
it would matter, if it actually went to the edge of space, the atmosphere would have been so low and the pressure difference would have been so high that any liquid LCD in the iPad would have melted and made the iPad unusable
Magik Kidz but this isn't the edge of space... its around 100,000ft
Skydiving iPad
IDiving lol
Idive
More like space diving
oh whats that?
its a bird!
no its a fly!
no wait what?
its an ipad
WOW! The ipad survived that fall, but Columbia didn't!
Adam Shendaj Why the hate, and how do you assume that I am Indian?
I agree! What a useless bastard.
Nikhil Godbole seriously. and besides, who the hell doesn't love curry?
Adam Shendaj wow. are you serious?
No, the real space shuttle that was disintegrated re-entering Earth's orbit.
How come you can hear foot steps in the dirt just after it "lands"? I think fake.
Someone give this man a cookie for being a expert
Its called time editing :3 Because I'm sure you would like to sit and wait for them in real time to find it.
Yes No lol ya
SageOfThunder Yeah I would, I have no life and 2 the ipad uses glass for its screen its not gorilla glass.And Andy has a very good point.
Sand FUCK
pls
Thank you for not dropping the Nokia 3310 to earth.
earth would break into 10000 pieces🙂😉
saw video before : ipad dropped 5 feet total screen broken falls from edge of space and survives
That was a different type of I pad that was an i pad air that was from 5 feet
but this one is just a normal i pad
Foxynerf does minecraft oh so you try to say that any thing falling from space with like 200/300 km/ph won't brake but something that falls from 5 feet does? o_o?
no im actually saying that the i pad air is light and easy to carry around with you its not designed for being a tank so what you said was irrelevant
air cushion
That would be the iPad Air, the normal iPad is a bit less... pathetic.
fake 1:44 you can see the clouds moving really fast then they slow down. maybe they did get it into space and back down but they used some kind of parachute before it hit the ground. you can tell they sped up the shot because the clouds move really fast then slow down abruptly
ya ik
soundspeed757 your stupid
Amanda Garrett You're* ... How ironic.
jackawaka *You're
Sekhubara You're meant to correct him, don't me with the exact same spelling.
Did anyone else notice in the cut between 1:39 and 1:41 the balloon remains disappear then reappear at 1:42
its to speed up the video
cameron baxter Correct, it would take far longer if they played the whole clip.
Yeah but the balloon remains still disappeared during one of the time intervals I wasn't talking about the time skipping ahead
oh ok
The ballon is just above the camera so you can't see it..
you guys are so lucky that land screen down but it was awesome footage from the edge of space
Ipad:doesn't break when falling from 100,000 ft
Iphone 6: Breaks when you bend it just a little too much.
Yeah I am calling bs on this unless that case is god and Apple got a major quality downgrade.
dude the iphone 6 only bends if you push to hard on it there was even a offical video were they tested it and the iphone stood up to 90 punds
AND YES I KNOW HORRIBLE SPELLING IM TO LAZY TO FIX
you jerk
Jad Ayash It makes you seem like you are a whole lot younger than you really are, and it makes you seem stupid, take the time to solve the word crime my friend.
LMFAO...I'm with you on that call.
***** its to
Lol dropped my iPad 18 stories and it survived... But I do know people who dropped it a foot and it shattered, but now there's space... Lmaooo fuck logic xD
Wouldn't it burn up when it re-enters the atmosphere?
well not exactly. Felix baughmer or whatever his last name was jumped around that hight. The helium balloon pops just before reaching the tip of the atmosphere where it would burn up.
it never left the atmosphere
gaimafolife29 It doesn't matter if it left the atmosphere or not. Once it falls and hits its terminal velocity its speed no longer increases.
When objects fly through the vacuum of space they can be travelling at tens of thousands of miles an hour so when it hits the atmosphere it compresses the gases in front of it with in turn causes heat. The iPad's terminal velocity is not fast enough to cause that to happen.
EweChewBrrr
Ohhhhhh.....
This is obviously fake, if something dropped from the height with nothing to slow it down,(like a parachute) it would simply make a dent in the ground or of course burn up in the atmosphere. So don’t gets thoughts that this is a real video.
Edit:Oh! Forgot to say that a iPad would go passed the speed of sound so it would burn like I said above, but I forgot to mention the hardware in the device would break apart and crash out through the screen of the iPad. It would go through the screen first because it easier, similar to a garage door in a hurricane. It is easy for the hurricane to get the garage first so it will get it first. And it landed in rocks and not a single DENT OR SCRATCH
It has air to slow it down. It would go no faster than its terminal velocity. It would not burn up. You need to educate yourself on why things burn up in the atmosphere. Something just simply falling will never be going fast enough to come anywhere close to the speeds necessary to cause that kind of heating.