Ten Hard Books I Want to Read (But It’s Fine If You Don’t)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 июн 2024
- In which I show some of the big, difficult books I'm excited to read in the future (while also insisting you not feel any pressure to read them yourself).
The other BookTubers who are showcasing similarly tough books they're excited about:
@ThatReadingGuy28
@BookishTexan
@materiagrix
----------------------
To Buy Me a Coffee (Thank You): ko-fi.com/toreadersitmayconcern
----------------------
----------------------
Chapters:
----------------------
00:00 Intro
01:37 Book 1 (Philosophy)
05:47 Book 2 (Historical Fiction)
09:31 Book 3 (History/Philosophy)
11:38 Book 4 (Fiction)
14:08 Book 5 (Science)
16:55 Book 6 (History)
19:29 Book 7 (History)
21:42 Book 8 (Science/History)
23:24 Book 9 (Science/Philosophy)
25:53 Book 10 (Fiction)
28:59 Bonus (Philosophy)
30:22 Outro
----------------------
Books Featured (With Global Amazon Links):
[Let me know if links break.]
----------------------
On What Matters by Derek Parfit: amzn.to/3U15jkS
The Dying Grass by William T. Vollmann: amzn.to/4aGXu9t
The Main Currents of Marxism by Leszek Kolakowski: amzn.to/4cEGyCu
Ha! A Self-Murder Mystery by Gordon Sheppard: amzn.to/4cDFD5h
The Structure of Evolutionary Theory by Stephen Jay Gould: amzn.to/4cDFVJp
The Story of Civilization by Will & Ariel Durant: amzn.to/3TKIj8n
The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin’s Russia by Orlando Figes: amzn.to/43Qr62g
The Modern Mind by Peter Watson: amzn.to/3xjCojp
The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World by Iain McGilchrist: amzn.to/43F7det
Bottom’s Dream by Arno Schmidt: amzn.to/3vNhkRE
The Open Society & Its Enemies by Karl Popper: amzn.to/3THgEp1
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
I can create these links for any books I choose, so this does not affect my choice of what books to cover for this channel.
----------------------
Bookshop to support local bookstores and this channel (U.S.): bookshop.org/shop/ToReadersIt...
Just happened on this by chance and now I own five new books. I love books that make me think. I will be 78 in 4 months and books like this keep me young. Also enjoyed your presentation with the comments on why you're interested.
I am near your age and I have always liked reading too, both fiction and the other subjects mentioned. One frustrating thing is that in referring to books and countering eccentric arguments, it often happens that people I am talking to do not get my references.
I suggest, the unbearable lightness of being by Milan Kundera
Happy birthday in advance
Wow what a long life ...hope I get to that age❤
Enjoyed your video. I never thought it would inspire videos from readers who love to read philosophy. I have been meaning to read Vollman for sometime. Thank you for the reminder.
I love hearing about potential new readers to Vollmann. He's an oddball with highest highs and lowest lows in his writing. Europe Central and Fathers & Crows are two great starting points. Though the book I presented, The Dying Grass, strikes me as him at his most lyrical and thus purely beautiful (I initially read almost 100 pages and then decided to return to the book at a more fitting time in my life; some books just give that feeling of significance and pause for me).
Fantastic video . Thank you for all your efforts on making this video
Thank you so much for watching and for being kind. 😀
When I was a kid, I read Chekhov' The Bet, and the desire stayed with me since. It is a pity that most book lovers don't have all the time to read. Thank you for the suggestions - added a few to my list.
That is a tough but sometimes necessary realization: we likely don't have the time to read every single book we want, and so we must cherish the time we have. I try to adore the time I get to read as much as I can.
I'm glad I helped you discover great books for yourself. That is ultimately the hope of this channel, to help others find wonderful books.
great video!
You mentioned a lot of unknown jobs that i didn´t knew anything about of before, i expected the usual "finnegan´s wake" "gravity´s rainbow" "ulysses", but that last book with the three columns was just full madness, looks more obscure and hard even that finnegan´s.
Thank you! And yeah, that last book, Bottom's Dream, is in an atmosphere all its own.
Wonderful! video. And I thought I was a bookaholic! I have read the Kolakowski (when it was 3 separate volumes), the Popper, and I have read pretty much all Gould- except for the one you showed. The Watson looks interesting. Right now my “fat book” is Irvin Yalom’s Existential Psychotherapy, but at somewhat less than 500 pages it may pale by comparison with some of your planned volumes. Thanks for the inspiration.
I just finished the 1,100 page The Tale of Genji. I am ready for your list. Parfit, Volman, just stunning.
That's a great accomplishment, congrats! I'll have another list of hard books down the line with more obscure writers (I hope).
If you don't mind, who was the translator of the edition you read? I want to start Genji, but I hear the cultural gap is wide, and so the translation and footnotes/endnotes is key.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern Royall Tyler, only read that. And the famous critique by Haruo Shirane "The Bridge of Dreams, A Poetics of the Tale of Genji.'
Interesting choices. I seemed to notice a book on your shelves behind and thought: "I bet this guy is from Montreal." The Sheppard book "HA!" strengthened my suspicion. It is a wonderful book about Hubert Aquin (hence the initials HA!), one of Québec's most important writer. I did my Masters thesis on the influence of Joyce in Aquin's writing. Very interesting stuff indeed.
This was a great video. I love your enthusiasm for analyzing how the authors play with words, format, etc in addition to the content. I share that with you for sure.
Thank you! I wonder if that inclination comes from reading a lot and then craving something new. After a while, certain stories become familiar, and then the desire becomes for how freshly a story can be told or how freshly ideas can be conveyed.
I see you have a great and nicely eclectic taste in books, by the way!
@@ToReadersItMayConcern yeah I think you're right. It's so exciting to see something new and fresh for us to analyze and explore. I especially love when writers break the "rules" of traditional writing. It doesn't always work but when it does it's just such a great experience. I first learned/experienced this when I was in college taking my first poetry class. Once I learned that poets often use every piece of a poem, I was fascinated. The way they use punctuation, line breaks, font, structure, the way words sound and feel in your mouth when you say them, etc. can all be a part of the overall message. Love it. And thank you!
@@readingwithkayla941 Oh, I think you'd really enjoy the works of Christine Brooke-Rose! She's a recent discovery for me. But she was a British writer who pushed and pushed the bounds of literary convention and voice in her writing, always considering how to break the page or the sound of the written word through textual play. There's a Christine Brooke-Rose Omnibus available that contains four of her short novels, and it offers a nice overview of her evolution as an experimental writer.
Oh, maybe I will do this too!! I agree that it is fun to just hear what other bookish people want to read, and I like the idea of choosing books that one thinks will be challenging! (There are so many in my case!) Yes, I want to read Vollman, not sure where to start. Ha! sounds amazing!! The Whisperers sounds fascinating too! I have a box set of Arno Schmidt’s stories and another novel, maybe one day I’ll try Zettel’s Traum. (Bottom’s Dream).
Bottom's Dream is such a startling, strange experience. I think it took me almost an hour to grasp the first page to any significant degree (viewing a PDF copy), but it felt doable-in a way Finnegan's Wake doesn't feel quite as doable-and I found the following pages to flow with what I learned from reading the first. It felt like a puzzle that becomes "obvious" once you get the pattern.
A great starting point for Vollmann is Europe Central, if you want something that invites you in, but The Dying Grass is so fiercely beautiful that that might be enough to carry you through.
All I read is fiction and while I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing, I feel like I should branch out into non-fiction a bit. I love history, so I may give The Story of Civilization a shot. Also, on a completely unrelated note I've noticed that you're a really good speaker. I can tell when you are thinking of a phase instead of filling the empty space with "um's" and "like's" you'll take a half second or so to form your thought. That's a good habit (I should probably do it more myself).
The Story of Civilization is the perfect entry point into history for someone who generally reads fiction. It's written with the flow and often the beauty of literary fiction, and the author-having been trained in philosophy-packs each book with his own insights and deeper considerations along the way. I hope you find a decently-priced used copy and enjoy it!
And thank you so much for the compliments on my speech! It doesn't always come naturally: I have to remind myself to trust in the listener, that they care and that they'll be forgiving; once I get into that mindset speaking becomes easier. It allows me to forgive myself for all my meanderings, and that fosters comfort. So often "um"s and "like"s are attempts to not have the person we're speaking to interrupt us, so we attempt to fill the empty spaces with noise, but doing so just disrupts our own thinking and doesn't allow for careful, articulate thought.
Since you love history, I think you would enjoy “A World Lit Only By Fire” by William Manchester either in print form or audio form. I started with the audio version and then read my long neglected print version.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern I concur.
Durant’s series isn’t hard. It’s just long. There is a lifetime of absolutely wonderful reading right there.
I’ve been listening to the old cassette recorded audiobook version done by Grover Gardner. I would like to actually get the entire series from my bookshelf, but at age 67, I don’t think I’m going to get through them all before I’m done with life.
The review is correct… It’s some of the most beautiful and masterful prose you can engage. I can’t see coming away from reading these without being a better writer as a result.
This is true of his standalone books too. He has several.
Durant engages you, that's for sure. On each page there's enough stuff to make you want to go and read up on the people/events he raises.
Thank you for including Dr. McGilchrist 's Matter with Things. It is long and expensive. But Dr. McGilchrist has a series of RUclips conversations which go over the book chapter by chapter which may be a good way to begin with them. Thank you for the nice characterization of Stephen Jay Gould. Agree with you entirely.
Thanks for sticking with the whole video despite your frustrations.
Very interesting list, thanks! I’m 63, and have not read as much as I would like. I’m mostly through with collecting my “retirement library”, which includes Darwin’s Beagle, Origins, and Descent books, as well as Dawkins’ Selfish Gene. If and when I make it through that series, your suggestion of The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (Gould) seems like a great next step. Thanks!
As an aside, my parents had the Durant books, as well as the Great Books series, and the Encyclopedia Brittanica. I wish I would have started reading those long ago, but the font size and line spacing really put me off. It wasn’t the density of the ideas, but the literal density of the text, that drove me away.
Anyway, I’ve subscribed and appreciate your suggestions.
I LOVE the idea of a “retirement library”! 😆that’s a fantastic way to put it. I’m only 33 (and still collecting), but the other day I was looking at my collection & thinking, ‘wow this is a lot of time consuming, heavy reads’…now I will think of it as something to look forward to in retirement! 😄🤍
Respectfully requesting a tour of that bookshelf behind you. I just now found your channel. New sub. Wishing you the best of success.
Some fun books. I used to read a lot more non-narrative philosophy, but for the past decade or so I've been more interested in real life problems that require concepts of chaos and complexity, and systems thinking rather than the stripped down philosophical approaches that ignore the messiness of reality. I thought about doing a response video on this thread, more in response to Steve Donoghue's response probably, but I am already doing a 24 tomes in 2024 project this year, using a random number generator to pick from my list of 24 hard/big books that I plan to finish this year. Maybe I'll do a list more along the lines of these response videos next year when it won't be competing with an existing reading project.
I hope you feel inspired to share your selection and thoughts. The more response videos the better as far as I'm concerned! I would bet there are all sorts of books you bring up I would have never thought of.
I have "The Matter with Things" and "The Master and Its Emissary" on my TBR and I need to just START them. It's so daunting! I put a couple of the books you mentioned on my wishlist. The difficult books I'm planning to tackle in the near-ish future are Gödel, Escher and Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, Prisoner's Dilemma: John Von Neumann, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb and The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon (it's 5000 pages long). Good luck with your difficult books!!!! Btw, I was able to get The Matter with Things Vol 1 and 2 for $40 on Kindle (both volumes included).
You have some great books lined up! I expect you'll love The Master and His Emissary and Gödel, Escher, and Bach (both of those layer worthwhile insights back-to-back-to-back; in my vid on annotation you can see how extensive my notes were in that book in one of the clips). You may want to also check out Le Ton beau de Marot: In Praise of the Music of Language, also by Douglas R. Hofstadter. That book is an extensive meditation on translation and what it reveals about information and symbolism and creativity generally. In some ways, it is a more personal and thus beautiful book than Gödel, though they both attempt to contend with information and how it transfers across layers of description (I read through Gödel I think two years ago; one of those books I'll likely return to someday).
We all have Decline and Fall on our shelves, don't we?-much like Proust, it's a great work sweetly anticipated to the point of remaining on one's shelf forever. Like you, I'll have to finally dust it off and get started, because neither of us knows how much time we have left. I hope it's worth the wait!
Nice shout out to On what matters. If I remember correctly, volume three was the one he “died working on”, but it was largely complete before he died.
Even though I disagree with him largely, I think it’s one of the best written works of philosophy I’ve read, and a great source of strong arguments for me to argue against.
That's what I most like about the Derek Parfit I've read so far (Reasons & Persons): even if I disagree with him, he communicates so clearly and takes his work so seriously that I appreciate the effort it takes to work through his ideas.
Lovely to hear someone speak so intelligently about some books with serious depth. I’m curious about Government House, and you’re the second person to mention it. You might be interested in ‘Buddhist Phenomenology’ by Daniel Lusthaus.
The House of Government by Yuri Slezkine is an extraordinary book, and I highly recommend it, BUT it does expect a lot of familiarity with history of the Soviet Union. It would help a lot to read a couple general histories first on that subject then dive in to that one.
And thank you, thank you for recommending Buddhist Phenomenology by Daniel Lusthaus. Not a book I've heard of before, so I'm excited to add it to my list of potential reads. It seems from my first impression online like a nicely dense and serious work. Excellent!
my Iphone really is spying on me bcuz i started with on what matters this very morning and now i am getting this video recommended
Even worse, maybe an algorithm subliminally got me to pick that book for this list in the first place!
Scary, All we can say is probably God wills it!@@ToReadersItMayConcern
This is news to you?
what a great and unique list, thanks for sharing. I have to read the Orlando Figes pronto.
I highly, highly recommend his book on the Russian Revolution itself-maybe best read prior to The Whisperers-, A People's Tragedy.
@@ToReadersItMayConcernI'm reading the Whisperers right now. I wish I read it before I read the Great Terror. It would have helped put things in a little better context.
Fantastic video!!
Fascinating. One suggestion: maybe include the titles and authors in your show notes, especially helpful in cases where your hand obscures the title/author in the video (eg.: marxist book).
Yes, will do!
Here's a copy:
The books discussed in this video are On What Matters by Derek Parfit, The Dying Grass by William T. Vollmann, The Main Currents of Marxism by Leszek Kolakowski, Ha! A Self-Murder Mystery by Gordon Sheppard, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory by Stephen Jay Gould, The Story of Civilization by Will & Ariel Durant, The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin’s Russia by Orlando Figes, The Modern Mind by Peter Watson, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World by Iain McGilchrist, Bottom’s Dream by Arno Schmidt, and an honorable Mention of The Open Society & Its Enemies by Karl Popper.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern, thanks very much!
@@ToReadersItMayConcern yes thank you very much. I will be looking at at least some of these.
This was a good video but unfortunately you are yet another “bookish” person propagandized by Marxism. There is nothing to be gleaned there, it would be like if you want to be a Michelin star chef and you went to Walmart to taste test only the most processed food. Total waste of time. And I suppose you and others might say that you want to read it just to understand Marxism, but that would be like wanting to understand astrology - it’s not real. Curiously these types of channels never read actual economics, like Human Action or Man, Economy, and State, or the like.
Wow, all of those sound amazing. I've seen the Will Durant series, but never knew much about them. As for my recommendations, a few come to mind: Gravity's Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon was a bit of a challenge, I've only completed half of it...one day I will read it all. The Pound Era by Hugh Kenner. Haven't gotten to it yet but it looks amazing. Godel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter. Let's see what you can make of it. Last but not least, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (3 volumes) by Edward Gibbon. I'd heard of it here and there, I think from an interview with Isaac Asimov that when he was young he was bedridden from an accident and relatives gave him the book, and he read it, and it inspired him to write the Foundation Trilogy. Happy reading!
Thank you for offering recommendations (only a few took me up on that offer so far)! These are all excellent books that deserve to be on this list. I'm grateful!
You will enjoy the Will Durant work it is a monumental gift to us. I am still making my way through it since beginning it during my undergrad days in the early 80s!
The number of volumes means it can be a series I steadily embrace through a large portion of my lifetime, which feels wonderful.
This is a great video idea. Might make one similar! Thanks for the idea :)
Yes, absolutely, go for it! The more the merrier!
I'm glad YT algorithms recommended this video to me. Would be nice to cover physics based hard books. Most of the books you reviewed are about philosophy, history and biology.
The Story of Civilization has been on my TBR for ages but it is incredibly hard to find in Europe, and it is so expensive when you find it!
That is such a shame! Do you ever end up in the U.S.? I got my copy of all eleven volumes from the Iliad Bookshop in North Hollywood, California for about thirty bucks, and they often seem to get new versions (though they sell out quickly). I can always try to be on the lookout for you.
The books are a pleasure to read. Durant's style is incredibly smooth, and he has the taste for a vivid story.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern That would be wonderful if you could! I haven’t yet been in the US but I have planned to do the Appalachian Trail on 2025 and spend visit all the states afterwards :)
@@materiagrix I recommend getting the eBook instead. There is an eBook of all twelve volumes together. I could send you a copy of it if you want. (it is an epub format). Unless, of course, you prefer having the complete physical set.
What a bummer: multiple volumes are generally available at most decent used bookstores, especially around colleges & universities. A lot these days, actually. Many boomers are dying off or retiring and dumping their entire philosophy and history collections. 30 years the entire set would go for well over $250
@@ThatReadingGuy28 Oh I’d love the ebook, I still want the physical format for something of that magnitude but the Ebook would be great to start dipping in and out! Do you have my email?
Between NOMA and punctuated equilibrium, I'm always a little wearly about Gould. Have you read Wonderful Life? It's really great, IMO.
I have not, actually. From Gould I've only read The Mismeasure of Man and his collected essays. What strikes me as intriguing about Gould is that he held strong to a position that did not persist beyond his passing, and yet it feels almost as if that has most to due with his untimely death: when alive, he seemed such a strident defender of his perspective, and he did so with often more rigor than his opponents (seemingly, and I base that on how often I've heard personal attacks on him rather than detailed refutations; though the logic of NOMA seems faulty at the outset). Doesn't make him right, of course. But it is interesting to me how much luck is involved in what positions continue receiving research or not, and research is key to data collection and thus the grounding for scientific theories. All that to say, it makes me want to take his work seriously, if only to conclude he failed-I at least want to reach such a conclusion after having given him a fair shot. If you happen to know of any knock-out refutations of his interpretations of the data, I'd love to read them! I want to be a sponge of this sort of stuff. Ultimately, I know so little, and that's why I love reading!
I read some of the Durant's books. Very well written. Very knowledgeable.
kösz
1. The Dying Grass is one of my favorite novels. The best thing about it is the poetic quality of its prose, unique in his oeuvre. The worst thing is the impossibility of keeping track of all the characters. Beware any novel with a glossary of names in the back.
2. The hard book that I want to re-read is Ducks, Newberryport.
I'm in the middle of reading Ducks, Newburyport on e-book. It's one of those periodic night-time reads, something I can drift in and out of, snapshots of a story, without losing much momentum. A strange book. Hypnotic.
Finnegans Wake should be on this list, it may well be the most difficult book ever written, including scientific and mathematical books. It's not an invented language, but it is a dream language with many different permutations, including combining words of different and the same language. It's a brain workout. It doesn't just add information to your existing brain structure, but changes that structure.. Reading it is a lifetime task, but as you do you, will never think about language the same ... or for that matter, anything else.
Yes, Finnegans Wake would be an excellent choice for the list! One of the aspects of my thinking in creating this vid was to avoid the bigger or more well-known choices, so Finnegans Wake was dropped, but in a more all-encompassing list it would definitely make the cut.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern Got it.
@@monumentofwonders Joyce fan here. I've read his other works but was interested if there was an annotated or reading guide for FW. On my second reading of Ulysses I used the Gifford annotated edition and got a lot more out of the novel. Can you recommend something like that for FW? Thanks!
@@deirdre108 There are guides. Some helpful, some less so. There's Roland McHugh's Annotations to Finnegans Wake, and what I'm finding useful now is "How Joyce Wrote Finnegans Wake: A Chapter by chapter Genetic Guide." There's also a website that annotates each line. But there is nothing like just reading it, and doing your best to read it out loud, because punning is a huge part of the book, with double and triple meanings for words and phrases. I've been reading the book for almost 20 years, and now when I finish reading it, which takes a year or so reading a page or a few paragraphs at a time, I just start again. It's a circular book: the first sentence completes the last sentence. I read for the same reason that concert pianists practice every day, because it a great exercise in how language, any language works. To close, you can find people reading the work on youtube, including Joyce himself reading a chapter. I highly encourage to dive in and persist, the more you put in, the more you get out. It will change the way you look at language and at any creative problem.
@@monumentofwonders Thank you so much for your recommendations! "There's a website that annotates each line." That is amazing to find out someone put that much work into doing something like that. Your comparison of reading FW to practising music every day hits home for me as I'm a professional harpist. So I'll keep that analogy in mind as I read (practise!) Finnegan's Wake.
Again, thank you!
Awesome picks! I noticed you have a set of Vollmann’s unabridged Rising Up and Rising Down. Does its exclusion here mean you’ve already read it?
Good eye! I only have the final two volumes (Studies in Consequences) left! I've read almost all of Vollmann's works, so I'll probably do a deep-dive primer on him someday.
that Vollman book looks really interesting in the way it structured. do you know any other books that does something similar? perhaps something shorter..
good luck reading Matter with things.
Great question!
That particular type of formatting is really, really odd. The only thing that comes to mind is maybe some of the work of Mark Z. Danielewski, such as his book series The Familiar (in parts) or little parts of House of Leaves-But those are long!
It seems like the most experimental books are lengthy. Two short-ish ones, though, are VAS: An Opera in Flatland by Steve Tomasula, which has sections that play with formatting inward into the page, and Nobodaddy's Children by Arno Schmidt, which does the opposite and extends the wording into the margins. There's also the short story collection Brief Interviews with Hideous Men by David Foster Wallace, which plays with the text in fresh ways but also happens to be well-written and emotionally complex.
One final tip, though, is to check out the collections Conceptualisms by editor Steve Tomasula and the Penguin Book of Oulipo. Both those collections focus on experimental literature and are a great way to discover authors who fit your tastes based on samples of their writing.
Hope that helps!
thank you for the suggestions. did not know any of them. I am in the middle of reading Oblivion by DF Wallace right now :)@@ToReadersItMayConcern
I cannot praise this channel enough.
You're so kind. Thank you!
Subscribed!!
I'm planning on getting to The Matter of Things. I really liked The Master and His Emissary.
Yes, The Master and His Emissary is good enough that the follow-up is surely worthwhile. Just gotta wait for the price to dip a bit. :)
You're a brave fella. Those multiple volumes of philosophy would require great focus, and I don't know how anyone would read them back to back, but maybe you intend to take little breaks or read them with something lighter, to keep the mind fresh. Still. The Arno Schmidt, too, seems quite intimidating, although I see there are plenty of things written online about it, so I'd be interested to read some of those, to find out more about the intriguing coded style of writing. Clearly, you don't get intimidated easily, and really epitomise what I imagine is meant by the term "advanced reader". Hope you have a wonderful time with these, and learn all sorts of amazing new things.
Thank you so much! This is very kind. I have tough times as a reader, too, days when I can't focus or moments when my enthusiasm wanes. I try to be honest with myself. Take breaks. Do something passive or simple. But I also find that, genuinely, the more complex works tend to hold my attention easier than 'simpler' ones; those works often require getting into a kind of zone of concentration, and the great works reward that concentration with worthwhile, meaningful thoughts. That feels like a deeply gratifying payoff. It also makes reading generally easier. I can jump to a 'softer' read and find myself coasting along its pages in ways I hadn't before. But at the end of the day I'm glad for anyone to read whatever they love. If I didn't love this sort of stuff it would not be worth the effort.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern I think it's possible to improve focus over time, and with applied, active intention, but you have to love knowledge deeply to get to the focus level you've achieved. I'm glad you are having such a rewarding experience, because you've put in so much to be able to learn so much from some challenging material. Thanks for your thoughtful reply, too.
please do more videos on philosophy books. suggest some must-read philosophy books. Do a longer video discussing your thoughts on philosophers, branches of philosophy, ethics, meta-ethics and your personal favourites ❤❤🎉
Absolutely! These are great ideas! I just recorded a couple vids, but after those come out I'll probably switch to covering an essential book on ethics and what it entails (Reasons and Persons) and then an overview of Philosophy of Science (more interesting than it initially seems).
@@ToReadersItMayConcern awesome 😍😍
For historical fiction, I would choose Solzhenitsyn’s Red Wheel. It is a series of 9 books with the 7th one coming out this Oct. This series takes us from 1914 thru the Russian Revolution in 1917
Sounds fascinating! Thank you!
I'd start with Solzhenitsyn's "August 1914", the version of "Red Wheel" that came out as a stand-alone work in the early 1970s. I like the original "August 1914" much, much better than the later version.
here is another very difficult book to read;
Principia Mathematica by Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell
Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers by Georg Cantor
The books of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, which I read in my 20s, have influenced my view of life. He was a French (Belgian?) priest who was also a palaeontologist. He helped discover some of the earliest dinosaur bones ever found, in Mongolia. He was threatened with excommunication because of his writings. Given you choice of reading topics, I strongly urge you to read at least one of his books.
Thank you so much! Hadn't heard of him before, so I'm excited to check this out!
Teilhard was French.
Great selection
Thank you so much! I may do a follow-up in the coming weeks that covers some lesser-known works (or, at least, I've begun notes in that direction).
I recommend a romanian physics book "Fizica Povestită" by Cristian Presură.
He is a physicist so a lot of explanation for us who don't know physics, besides it also has stuff about space like the first image of a black hole.
Other IMHO must read, and short, complex masterpieces:
Jorie Graham's "To 2040"
Gerald Murnane's "The Plains"
Jon Fosse's "A Shining"
I alternate long and short.
This is excellent! Thank you!
My favorite historical reads are about the Papcy, changing of the courtier systems from medieval to renaissance times, how ancient practices or inventions (aqueducts, roads, boats, etc..) have changed over the years, and gothic architecture.
If you have any particular recommendations-there are huge gaps in my sense of medieval history-I'd love to check them out!
hope to see more book content from you as i liek your presentation.
just a question but what si the book behind you that has white. yellow, blue and red circles? it looks like it says gene but hard to tell
Yes, I have more videos in mind coming soon. I'm glad you're enjoying my stuff so far!
As for the book, I believe you're referring to The Gene: An Intimate History by Siddhartha Mukherjee, a historical overview of how we came to understand genes/genetics and what's left to understand. He also wrote an excellent book on our growing understanding of and attempts to cure cancer called The Emperor of All Maladies, which you may appreciate.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern thank you, it stuck out on the shelf and has a cool pattern but now knowing what its about. i can say it sounds pretty interesting and i will admit i dont really read non fiction at all but that is one i may give a try. so thank you for that
I'm currently reading Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals, and Beyond Good and Evil. I'm currently having difficulty in fully grasping writing style and argument construction of Nietzsche, its not the hardest books to read but it sure is hard for me. Its not the first philosophy book, as I've been indulging myself in studying philosophy for 3 months now, started with Russel and Durant's philosophical survey, and then reading Plato, Descartes and Rousseau. Any advice for novice readers for philosophy, especially Nietzsche?
Nietzsche happens to be unique among philosophers in his writing style: rather than logical in his construction of arguments (in some ways, he does not construct arguments in the traditional sense at all), he focuses more on the psychological side of what he writes about. Think of Nietzsche's writing as musings or acerbic meditations on how culture has developed and how culture is changing and the dangers that can arise; you can also, kind of, think of it like poetry, as in, truths presented metaphorically and with an emphasis on emotion more than reason.
Genealogy of Morals-if I remember correctly-is Nietzsche's speculations on how we developed Christian morality and what that suggests about our psychology (again, the key is it's him speculating on how it's affected our way of thinking); Beyond Good and Evil becomes about the responsibility we have for our lives now that we can't fall back on God or anything else for objectivity. Both books use those topics as jumping off points to talk about almost everything we take for granted, all the things we presume 'have to be this way' and don't actually have to be that way.
But the key is all of the above is not presented as a reasoned argument. It's more that Nietzsche seems to have noticed a potential problem-e.g. the problem of abandoning belief in God and the morals therein-and what that means for our psychology, because we may think its something we can abandon without consequence, and Nietzsche seems to feel there is actually a great deal of consequence. That said, he's also not saying we need God or Christianity or anything like that. He's more saying that the same psychology that led to God and Christianity is still within us and thus we have to contend with how we're gonna end up projecting those desires onto our future (such as persisting in judging things as "good" and "evil").
Nietzsche is within the category of philosophy almost in name only. He's rebellious and opinionated and often saying what he feels more than what he's carefully thought through. Still, he's important as a figure who questions what we take for granted. If philosophy is a practice of questioning dogma, he's in that practice of questioning our essential dogmas. And that is useful for helping you think through your own thoughts. It's also very likely you won't agree with Nietzsche's entire conclusions-that's to be expected. He's more engaging if you just allow yourself to consider why he felt the way he felt and how that matches or doesn't match what you notice in life.
I do have a couple recommendations for you, though. For all philosophers that you read going forward, I highly recommend that you read the A Very Short Introduction books for each philosopher first. Those serve as great introductions because they're just long enough to cover a wide range of a philosopher's ideas-longer than what you'd find in an overview like Russell's or Durant's-but also intended for someone new to the material. Of all the summaries I've read of philosophers, I've found the A Very Short Introduction series to be the best. Aside from that, there is also the free Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy available online. However, those entries are far denser and thus more advanced. Still, when it comes to philosophy, get as much of a summation of the philosopher's views as you can prior to reading. It'll help give you a mapping of what to pay attention to.
Last recommendation: I just listened (literally yesterday) to The Popperian Podcast #13 with guest Ken Gemes, and I felt he gave an excellent summary of Nietzsche's views. That may help you.
Good luck!
@@ToReadersItMayConcern Man this so great, I really appreciate that! Definitely going to revitalize and restructure my reading with this kind of perspective. Starting from podcast to the short introduction then. Thanku bro very much!!
Oh my, if you can ever get through 'The Stone and the Flute' by Hans Bemman (a 1983 (?) translation of his original German book (Stein und Flöte, und das ist noch nicht alles). I read it first while in the army in 1987 or so, and got through it once more a few years later. If I'd ever had the main character within my grasp I'd happily have strangled him for sheer idiocy! I think it's now at the bottom of a stack of boxes which also include all the Thomas Covenant novels. To think I read those last 2 or 3 times without slitting my throat is mind-boggling to this day! 🙄
Howard Sachar’s “A History of Israel” is 1,200 pages of non-stop Middle Eastern entertainment 😎
Infinite Jest needs to be on this list
That book would fit in perfectly except that I read it in the past.
I'm so glad this popped up randomly. I was fortunate last year to spy Derek Parfitt' s new Biography. What a fascinating and perfectly fine person who died So young. A fabulous mind and well-rounded cheerful kind person. Pleased you began with Parfitt!
Little did I know, beginning with Parfit would turn out to be the strongest connection for like-minded viewers. I'm so glad I started with Parfit!
Thank you for introducing these books.
Absolutely! I'm glad they're of interest to you!
Here’s my list:
Randall Collins - Sociology of Philosophies
Juergen Habermas - Between Facts and Norms
Nico Poulantzas - Fascism and Dictatorship
Talcott Parsons - American Society
Jeffrey Friedman - Power without Knowledge
Slavov Zizek - Living in End Times
Carol Vance - Pleasure and Danger
Rasmussen - The Handbook of Critical Theory
Pierre Bourdieu - Logic of Practice
Jacques Derrida - Disseminations
Phenomenal list! Have you considered creating a BookTube channel of your own? You have fantastic taste.
(For in case you don't read my whole comment: Science Fiction with Damien Walter hosted a podcast interview with Ian McIan McGilchrist on this book; it's brilliant!) I love your collection, and I love the reasons you have for reading each of them. Sometimes the relevance of a book is not the specific content, but the way it makes us think about what we take as truth, where we come from, and what we've been taught. I read the same way and with the same reasoning. I have a couple of hard books of my own to get through, so not quite ready to take on your list, but Ha! and The Whisperers seem right up my ally! I am also interested in Reasons and Persons (mentioned, although not part of your ten), and I love the idea of The Dying Grass, but I am a bit tired of reading all of these things about the Northern Hemisphere. I do have it on my list to check if there is something more relevant to Africa (I am from South Africa), and it's not that it won't be without value, just that there are other books higher on my to read list. Ian McGilchrist's book is also on my list and I am also waiting for the price to drop a bit.
I'm glad some of what I selected resonated with you. Thank you for your insights!
As soon as you mentioned South Africa, a particular "hard" book came to mind: Frontiers: the Epic of South Africa's Creation and the Tragedy of the Xhosa People by Noel Mostert. It's a hefty, intimidating book with much horrors to speak of while also containing a poetic, meditative quality to its prose. I had never heard of that book until I stumbled on it in a used bookstore. I hope it's new to you, too, and you can add it to your list!
@@ToReadersItMayConcern Thanks for the recommendation! I have not read that yet and I am not afraid of hard books, although they do take me longer to get through. I feel that if the information is worth delving in to, it deserves to be absorbed well. So I make notes and take my time to process things. Definitely going to look into getting this! 🙏
Out of curiosity - have you been able to make your way through the Big Books by the Big Thinkers of modern philosophy, especially Kant, Hegel, Marx, Husserl, Heidegger, and Sartre?
I'd like to do it myself, but life is short, and I suppose I'd be satisfied if I could make my way through Copleston's History.
I had to read a wide mix of those philosophers throughout college; however, I have also gone back to some, such as Kant (highly recommend Pluhar translation) and Marx, after reading other works about them, and I find that reading the original sources after reading critical evaluations or summaries to be a far more gratifying experience. You may want to just let yourself read overviews like Copleston's for a while, just to see whose ideas resonate with you most, and then once you've pinpointed single philosophers, maybe read the Oxford Very Short Introduction book on that philosopher (that series of books has been the best at summing up philosophy for me). I feeling I get is that I most appreciated the original sources only after grasping the conversations surrounding them. So let yourself bask in those conversations a while.
That said, the best original sources to actually read among the list you gave is definitely Kant and Marx, and somewhat Sartre. The reason I say that is because so much of what they wrote gets grossly simplified. It is nice to actually take their own words in and interpret for yourself. The others seem to work fine for me in overviews or summaries.
Being much into metaphysics and the like I would like to eventually read Irreducible Mind along with Immortal Remains.
And I've seen many people swear by the Malazan Book of the Fallen, which is seemingly both very long and complex.
I LOVE esoteric recommendations like this! Thank you so much!
I just found William and Ariel Durant yesterday 2 books for like 12 bucks and I believe it’s the same civilization series. I have never enjoyed reading but this year I’ve been hard pressed on reading a books a chapter a day. I’m a history guy and I have 1 RECOMMENDATION: read
The Thirty Years War by C. V. Wedgewood a beautiful history about the Protestant religion; Lutherism and Calvinism vs Catholicism. But it’s more than just religious disputes of the charge and more of the dynasty (Hapsburg) taking over Europe and countries come together to try to fight and gain religious independence and the invasion of Sweden to help the German people to gain some of that freedom by fighting against Austria (Hapsburg Dynasty) and Spain. Sorry for the long formatted text but I’m obviously love the book beyond the information the reading style is so lovely. Give it a try. And I saw your Daniel J. Boorstin, Discoveries in the background and I have it but haven’t read it. Glad to see not talked about authors/historians because sometimes their information is old, circa early half of the 19th century.
I love this recommendation! Thank you!
Please feel free to recommend any others that come to mind. You have great taste!
Good luck man
Thank you (as I already feel quite lucky)!
If you are truely interested in philosophy you are much better served with reading the classics as opposed to the ones you mentions. So start with the roots and pick up atleast some of the basic Writings of Plato, Aristotle, and Thomas Aquinas. Then maybe branch out to fields that interest you most. For examples you could read Epictetus Marcus Aurelius Spinoza Bacon Hume Descartes Kant and so on.
These are good recommendations. I'm not new to philosophy, though. It's been a part of my reading for about 15 years (I'm older than I look). But your comment should be helpful to anyone trying to grasp the subject, so thank you for that.
A few of these books are on my list to read! Main Currents of Marxism is right up my alley but that paperback you held up is so expensive.
It's the sort of chunker that might actually be worth a hefty price. Based on the contents page and my perusing of chapters here and there, it seems like such a wondrously nerdy deep-dive into Marxist ideological history, and the author maintains a distinct voice on the page through-and-through without being preachy or vague or snobby (at least from what I've read).
I read that Gould book-it’s great.
Fantastic! I can't wait to read it!
Interesting selections. Is your strategy to buy just a few books? Many of these are so long.
I'm generally fond of lengthier works. I guess I prefer 'escaping' for a long time in books. There are some incredible short ones, though! I may do a video on the best short books I've read. That could be fun!
Moby Dick is the hardest book I’ve read. That one was really tough. I have The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoyevsky in qeue coming up. That one looks tough but it’s a giant of a novel. I’ll pace myself with tough long reads by reading shorter easier novels before and after. I’m on One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest now, after reading Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings series in order from The Hobbit through.
Get the kindle version of The Matter With Things. Better than waiting for the hardcover price to fall from $140.
It's 3000 pages you'll never regret.
It really helps if you have read The Master and His Emissary first.
Can you make a bookshelf tour? Otherwise great choices
Yes, absolutely. I plan to, though it'll be split in many parts (over 1,000 books to show) and I need to figure out a decent camera setup for it.
With the caveat that I’ve never read complex philosophy, or those overly obtuse modern novels, the only book I’ve had a hard time with was The Tale of Genji. It’s so old and and so dense with period cultural references that have no familiarity at all, constantly shifting relationships, and political dynamics among a lot of characters with difficult names that it was just difficult to follow.
Last year I plowed through Human Action by Mises, which is one of the dryest/densest books I’ve read. That said, when an idea from one of those beasts clicks it’s very rewarding.
I literally just received my ordered copy of Mises' book on Socialism (an economic and social criticism) and then browsed at the four volumes of Human Action, thinking, hmm, should I?-So, do you think it was worth your time? Should I order them or maybe wait 'til after getting through his other book?
@@ToReadersItMayConcern It’s a subject I’ve been involved with for a while, so I felt like I “should.” It was worth my time, but no need to divert your plans necessarily.
I've had Story of Civilization for like 5 years now and it's intimidating.
It's one of those collections I plan to read over the span of a lifetime, not back-to-back, but spread out amidst various other books. Having started it, I'd say the reading is not so heavy as it seems: Will Durant writes exceptionally smoothly and is always thoughtful about the facts he presents, not merely listing out the details but considering them and their context and musing on the implications of each and questioning the meaning between the facts. I think you'll enjoy it. But spread it out!
genuine question, have you read all the books behind you? If so, how long did that take? Thanks!
That's a great question! Perusing the shelf, I've read roughly about 70% of the books there. The ones laying horizontally are especially recent purchases, and some of the books, such as the anthologies of philosophy, are ones I dip in when I want to learn something specific but not ones I read straight through. To reach that 70% I'd say it's taken me about fifteen years of serious reading (about 1 - 3 hours of reading a day, and I'm a bit older than I might look). And, FYI, I work as a teacher, so reading and continually educating myself has been essential for a long time.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern wow, thank you for letting me know! Your video was very well done :)
Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce (pierced noses)..Great book..
I would HIGHLY recommend Tragedy & Hope by Carroll Quigley. Well over 1,000 pages on history. Very dense.
He also wrote one called Weapons Systems and Political Stability that’s dense and long. I have it but not read it yet.
Quigley was a professor of history that had a huge influence on Bill Clinton.
This is an especially obscure recommendation, which is very much appreciated! Keep 'em coming!
Split hemispheres? I wonder what that's like. (I was never constructed normally.)
Hello, for God's sake, how do you find the time to read all these books?
Genuinely, I'm a slow reader, but I read consistently-2-3 hours daily, at minimum-and this has been the case for at least ten years. Over time the number of books I've read has accumulated. I do not aim to read a lot of books: finishing a book means nothing in itself; it is the ideas in the books that matter. So I read slowly and carefully, which, I've discovered, makes the act of reading more engaging on the whole and thus something easier to do for long stretches of time (on days off with no distraction I can read fully from morning to night).
I've also discovered, at least for myself, that making reading such a constant habit also makes it quicker to get into the "zone" for comprehension, that feeling of being wholly engrossed and not distracted. That used to be a tough state for me to get into, but it's become far easier over the years, which then makes it easier to read in smaller chunks of scattered time on busier days.
One other thing: I also work as a teacher. This creates incentive to be well-informed and also creates an outlet for me to test my comprehension by communicating what I've learned (and then re-reading anything I can't explain well).
Kolakowski's "Is God Happy?" was a book I enjoyed a great deal. Ditto Gould's "The Mismeasure of Man". And "Open Society" sits on the shelf immediately above the desk where I am typing this, perhaps for keeps. (I'll probably make videos about all those in due time!)
You strike me as someone with great taste in books! And you speak on them so well, too.
I would suggest that if one sees no practical difference from their study of metaethics, then they are doing something wrong. For instance, becoming convinced that, say, cognitivism is false and non-cognitivism is true, should change one’s assent and attitude with respect to any number of moral claims, situations, and attitudes.
I fail to see how this could not be the case, ceteris paribus.
It certainly can have that effect! It can also not convince, or it can convince on the back of intuition, which for someone highly reflective can lead to circling round and round considerations and thought experiments about one's intuitions instead of acting in the world. I find myself, seemingly instinctively, becoming the latter, and logic alone does not rattle my desires.
Orlando Figes is a wonderful writer, historian and brilliant researcher!
I wholeheartedly agree!
Is that Anatomy of Melancholy I see there in the background… I recognize the teal of the NYRB edition
Good eye! Yep, it is.
I read Critique of Pure Reason for lighthearted fun.
I would direct your attention to the book by the cultural historian, Jacques Barzun's, From Dawn to Decadence, a history of 500 years of western culture from the Renaissance to today, wonderfully well written and entertaining. Barzun was an authority on how to write and translate. He was my mentor in my translation of Hector Berlioz's A Travers Chants |The Art of Music|, a collection of his music criticism.
I own a copy of From Dawn to Decadence but haven't read it yet. I'll be sure to keep it in mind for the future! That's fantastic that you got to have Barzun as your mentor. That must be quite the memory for you!
@@ToReadersItMayConcern It is quite the memory. I have a huge pile of letters from him. He was a wonderful man in addition to being a genius.My husband and I visited him in his 90's when he was writing the history of the world, From Dawn to Decadence.It was a best seller. He lived to the ripe old age of 105.
I've got the entire collection of twery pratchett, I've 34 discworld novels, whenever I feel tired from it I read stephen king. I've got most of those books par 3 and have read most of them too except sleeping Beauties cause apparently it's awful and the newest one Holly. Still reading stephen king dark tower atm.
Did something similar. Got almost every Pratchett book in a sale and worked my way through them in order. I would switch out for King or Herbert or some sci-fi.
I only made it about 13 books in though and now I’ve forgotten where I got to.
Love ethics and logic
Same here! I can't help but keep reading both.
Picking a Vollmann novel made me instantly interested in your channel. Nice video buddy.
I know exactly the feeling: the moment I find BookTubers who are even aware of Vollmann I nod in agreement and sub. Thanks for being here!
Gulag Archipelago is such a slog. An old timer who lived through it told me it was an important book to read though. He also pointed out, multiple times, that Solzhenitsyn is a terrible writer. Read another comment on here referring to another book that’s much better so I look forward to picking up a set & getting a better perspective!
Nice job.Over my head but very interesting....
Glad you still enjoyed it!
Interesting
It looks like you have
a lot to tackle.
Don't make any plans
for the next thirty years.
Peace on earth.
Critique Of Pure Reason and Finegan's Wake...
The two volumes of Popper's _Open Society_ is the only philosophical book I have read in one fell swoop. I did so at the age of fifteen in the translation by Feyerabend, which Popper hated. Popper's scholarship is lousy (which to find out took me two decades), but his acerbic style and opinionated passion make the two volumes an easy and highly entertaining read. It's not a "hard book" at all.
Could the difference in translation have had an effect?-My experience the first time through required much attention to syntax and phrasing to make sure I got each point, and the wealth of endnotes contributed greatly to some of the "hard"ness of reading it.
@@ToReadersItMayConcern Interesting question to which I have no answer. As it was Popper's first major publication in English, it may very well be a bit clumsily phrased, but not being a native speaker, it would be hard for me to tell.
the red wheel, solzhenitsyn
suma theologica aquinas
human comedy - balzac
eric voegelin works
o lost - thomas wolfe
the demons - Heimito Von Doderer
Out of Revolution: Autobiography of Western Man - Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy
Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith - James H. Billington
This is an excellent list!
Will keep you busy.
Interesting list of books. I am surprised there seems to be an English edition ( or "translation" even?) of Arnold Schmidt's _Zettel's Traum_ (ZETTL'S TRAUM in Schmidt's preferred rendition). Do you happen to know who is responsible for typesetting the English version? As far as I can judge from your footage, it has an uncanny resemblance to the German edition typeset by Friedrich Forssman, which, if memory serves, is set in some version of Bembo, while your edition seems to be set in one of Slimbach's Garamond fonts. Even the kerning details show Forssman's preferences. Forssman had worked on the German edition for years, which helped to establish his reputation as a serious typographer. Some time ago, he provided a lengthy (non)explanation for the nonexistence of a digital edition of Schmidt's work. Yet, you say there is a pdf of the English edition. I have been unable to find it. Does it have an ISBN assigned to it?
Also, as I am not well acquainted with Schmidt's work, I don't have the slightest idea why the English title is _Bottom's Dream_ and how it is related to the original German title. Do you?
By the way, the correct pronunciation of the author's surname is ʃmˈɪt. If you don't read IPA, it sounds like s h i t with an _m_ inserted after the _sh._
I LOVE the attention to detail in your comment. It just feels so satisfying.
I believe the typeset of the English edition was custom-made by the translator, John E. Woods-But I don't remember where I heard that from, so I could be wrong!
I can definitely share the full PDF with you if you like. I'm not sure how to do so without my comment being flagged by RUclips, though. Sometimes RUclips can be very finnicky about such things.
But I can guide you to it: if you use Reddit, go to the Arno_Schmidt subreddit, and the top pinned post is called Out of Print: The Current State of Acquiring Schmidt's Books. There is a numbered list in that post. Scroll down to number 6 for Bottom's Dream and you'll find a link to a folder that contains the PDF.
As for the title, I remember seeing a post on the Goodreads website specifically about why it was titled that way in English. But I can't find it now, unfortunately. There is, though, a GREAT video all about the English versions of Arno Schmidt's works here on RUclips. It is called Arno Schmidt: A Primer. I hope that helps you!
EDIT:
I do remember something about "Bottom's Dream" being a quote from Shakespeare's play A Midsummer Night's Dream. At one point a character in the play says, "The eye of man hath not heard, the ear of man hath not seen, man’s hand is not able to taste, his tongue to conceive, nor his heart to report what my dream was. I will get Peter Quince to write a ballad of this dream. It shall be called “Bottom’s Dream” because it hath no bottom." But I don't remember why that is the exact choice of translation.
Thanks for the correction!
@@ToReadersItMayConcern Thanks a lot indeed for the pointers. Much appreciated!
The English translation was published in 2016 by Dalkey Archive Press, and sold out after a few years. "Bottom's Dream" is a reference to a scene in Shakespeare's "Midsummer Night's Dream."
hi! quick question! do you have a degree or do you read as a hobbie?
Hey, yeah, I have an English degree and work as a teacher and sometimes as a book editor.
I have read articles by Parfit - I agree but find the implications of animal rights difficult to implement; the 3 volumes by Kolakowski are average Marxist fare, it is important to dig deeper into Lenin, Trotsky and Luxembourg to understand Marx and the revolutions; Gould’s Structure is excellent as he lays bare the main points of contention in evolutionary theory, parts of Durant but consider Toynbee, and Popper’s Open Society who waxes eloquent while concealing a few lacunas in his philosophy of science. But, I wonder why you picked Arno Schmidt and not Gunter Grass. It seems to me that Grass is far more significant as a novelist and as a speechwriter.
Hmm, I haven't read any of Gunter Grass yet. Do you have recommendations on where to start with his work?
@@ToReadersItMayConcern Tin Drum was widely accepted and approved , but Dog Years is the one I am looking for. My Century and Diary of a Snail are also good. He’s a Nobel laureate and became very politically active since the 60’s.
Forgive me for being hasty. The books and authors are given in the description. THANK YOU.
👍🙏
Could you please give the names of the books and authors clearly and perhaps, hold the book up long enough for the audience to read the title?
Yeah, sorry about that. I put all the titles in the description in the order they appear. Here's a copy:
On What Matters by Derek Parfit, The Dying Grass by William T. Vollmann, The Main Currents of Marxism by Leszek Kolakowski, Ha! A Self-Murder Mystery by Gordon Sheppard, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory by Stephen Jay Gould, The Story of Civilization by Will & Ariel Durant, The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin’s Russia by Orlando Figes, The Modern Mind by Peter Watson, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World by Iain McGilchrist, Bottom’s Dream by Arno Schmidt, and an honorable mention of The Open Society & Its Enemies by Karl Popper.
The Nine Freedoms published by The Aetherius Press.
Finnegan's Wake, Ulysses, Beowulf, Sound and Fury, Chaucer's Works
Trying to mention less obvious ones, avoiding books I already read or attempted to read, and can't repeat books mentioned by the other videos that did this same topic before me. Most importantly, these are the ones I plan to read soon-ish. I'm likely to do a follow-up video that'll cover tougher and hopefully even more obscure material. But all your suggestions are solid ones!
@@ToReadersItMayConcern I figured that out half way thru ... Bottoms' Dream has me intrigued... BTW, reading Beowulf and Chaucer in the original early and middle English is what I am talking about, not recent translations.. that is a challenge.. I speak some German so it's a lot easier for me.
Depending on your fluency, you may be able to appreciate some of the works by Marianne Fritz. She spent her lifetime on an unfinished multi-volume work-nicknamed "The Fortress"-that is supposed to be similarly experimental like Bottom's Dream, but it's only in German, I think. And Bottom's Dream and all of Arno Schmidt's work is originally written in German and should be way easier to get ahold of than the English version (though still probably a somewhat rare find).
A hard book to read, the Urantia Book.
Cut to the chase and read ‘the matter with things’. Get it on kindle if it’s too expensive If it doesn’t change your worldview then by all means go back to ‘what matters’.
I'm guessing you also read his prior book, The Master and His Emissary. How do the two compare in their balance of neuroscience and philosophy (The Master felt even to me in that regard)?
@@ToReadersItMayConcern As you might expect he goes more deeply and broadly into both areas. The scholarship and thoroughness are impressive but also how he weaves together the ideas. Not only do I look at life differently now but I benefited from being introduced to a whole raft of philosophers and scientists, and also historical and cultural perspectives.
Wow, okay, thank you very much for explaining further. I look forward to reading the book!