Starmers interview where he basically says nuclear war is a price worth paying to support Ukraine is the craziest thing I've ever seen from a British leader. I am so deeply ashamed of my country. These people's required corruption in supporting mass migration has led to leaders who are totally ignorant and incapable 😢
There are many towns and cities in Britain where the proportion of Muslims is higher than the proportion of Russians in Mariupol etc. Where is the invasion and where is the liberation?
Only 65% of Britain is British - 35% are foreign born. And Starmer is happy to keep increasing the population. I'm terrified of the number of actual British and how low that would be.
Russia is not bluffing, Russia is desperate. Maybe, Russia should think about the consequences before starting a war. Go on Russia, push the button. Do I dare you.
@@cyruslupercal9493Desperate for what bud ? 😂 Isn't clownsky and NATO the ones desperate for more ammo , troops, money and to hold any ground ?? @cyruslupercal9493
Missile defense that is able to intercept an ICBM is expensive af to the point the US themselves only owns a couple dozen interceptors. They are highly unlikely to "waste" a couple of them on protecting the Ukies. Especially given that the ICBMs vastly outnumber the interceptors.
I visited Dnipro in December 2003 as part of a DoD Nunn-Lugar inspection team. There's a factory there that produces missiles. It made the missiles that were transported to Cuba in 1962. I would have thought the industrial area of Dnipro would have been hit long ago, as it's an obvious target. As for the ICBM, I would have targeted Kiev, not Dnipro. The ICBM was a demonstration shot. Let Zelensky and his Nazis see what an ICBM strike, even without a nuclear warhead, looks like. It was six MIRV warheads coming down like lightning,
Missile plant is valid target, if you want to make sure that all long range missiles in Ukraine are not made on its territory. Both politically and strategically.
@@genes.3285The Yuzhmash facility had been hit by the RF on several occasions since 2022 by the cruise and short range ballistic missiles. But not on this scale, by the ICBMs with the MIRV warheads. This site also has extensive underground facilities, a new target for a new strike. These are just my thoughts.
@@andreasschmidt2739 Naturally. They have conventional weapons with the destructive power of a nuclear bomb. If you're in Europe, pray they don't lob it at your country.
@@phenix4195 These small explosions could've been all nukes and it arrived at the target in just 5 minutes with no chance of interception, i think it's quite clear that this was a warning. Good luck when they decide to fill these missiles with nuclear warheads...
Test laungh of US minuteman and UK trident failed. This hit in intented target, impossible say how many Ru tried to laungh. Ru is good building working weapons.
if that was question to anyone then we are really lead by people with big challenges in head, ICBMs was used in tests hundreds of times, they have them from beginning of ICBMs, they are leader in that category and current ones they have are most advanced in world, of course they work, this was just warning that we are second before beginning of nuclear war
I don't think the western leaders are willing to sacrifice their comfortable lives engaging in a nuclear war with Russia, however i do think it's quite possible that we're going to see a nuclear explosion in Ukraine, i don't think Zelensky is going to back off on its missile strikes.
Not really. It was lucky NATO didn't respond in kind with actual nuclear warheads when they detected the launches. This is foolish escalation from both sides.
@@somethingsomething8511 Guess what, there is a reason why all NATO country embassies in keev were issuing warnings yesterday. The russians TOLD them that they'll strike back.
@ you mean that you believe that NATO would start ww3 in support of a country that is too corrupt to belong to its alliance? Thats very telling of what the western alliances actual intent is…. And of course they wont… but do get back to me next week if im wrong, and Nato does start ww3.
@@somethingsomething8511that has to be the dumbest response. Russia has already said, they see any of that bullshit anywhere, every single capital city in Europe will have nuclear weapon hit them in less than 10 mins. NATO isn't going to do SHIT.
Russian brigades are near 100% while Ukrainian ones are often depleted especially since Ukraine prefer to form new bridages at a cost of reinforcing the existing ones.
@@silentstorm3467 1. They say it themselvs 2.This is the reason why Ukraine kidnap people from the streets - in order to keep numbers at relatively sustainable lvl
@@silentstorm3467depleted doesn't necessarily mean they no longer have anyone fighting, it means they are losing more men than they can recruit, which explains why Ukraine was conscripting pretty much every male at this point
Weeb You’re effing brilliant you are so good. I don’t bother to watch any other channels except for military channel. That’s from an Aussie Bloody brilliant mate
Надо пояснить, что этот удар был предупреждением, и предупреждением не для Украины, а для западных стран, так как применили РС-26, у которой дальность полета от 2 до 6 тысяч километров в управляемом режиме с точностью удара до 150 метров, которая может нести до 4 отдельных боеголовок с собственным наведением и термоядерным зарядом, смысла нет. Одной такой ракеты с заряженными боеголовками хватит на крупный город, например Берлин или Лондон, сбить которую практически невозможно, скорость самой ракеты 6,7 километра в секунду, скорость отдельных боеголовок гиперзвуковые и которые маневрируют, единственный шанс их сбить только на старте, чего никто сделать не сможет, так как запускаются они с мобильных платформ. Все это в противостоянии с Украиной излишне, и поэтому смысл был в предупреждении не Украине, а именно странам НАТО и с учетом новой ядерной доктрины России, где уже прямо обозначили, что нападение на Россию по средствам марионеток типа Украины будет расцениваться как совместное нападение и ответ будет соответствующим. Вообще, я бы на месте западных граждан был сильно благодарен Путину за его сдержанность и благоразумие, потому что западные «лидеры» путают добрую волю и сдержанность со слабостью, и поэтому полагают, что Россия блефует в угрозах ответного удара. И, честно говоря, мне искренне жаль видеть, насколько отупели западные политики, эти идиоты в попытке доказать свое превосходство над миром реально могут довести конфликт до третьей мировой, потому что при всем огромном терпении Путина оно рано или поздно кончится. Проблема в том, что в противостоянии России с НАТО или США не будет войны танками, самолетами, не будет иметь смысл, у кого больше солдат и как они обучены, все очень быстро перерастет в обмен ядерными ударами. Просто поразительно, что Запад, постоянно повышая эскалацию в конфликте с Россией, не осознает последствий своих действий. Я не собираюсь никого пугать и надеюсь, что все это только гипотетически, но Россия в ядерном противостоянии превосходит НАТО и США вместе взятых, размер России - это стратегическое превосходство, она огромна и нанести столько ударов, чтобы уничтожить все, просто не получится, Россия обладает не только самым большим и самым современным ядерным арсеналом, но и всеми видами доставки, более того, она обладает лучшей системой ПВО, обновленными ракетами, ядерными торпедами «Посейдон», которые уничтожают портовые города и аналогов которых ни у кого нет, системой «Периметр» или, как на западе называют, «Мертвая рука», которая автоматически наносит ответный удар, и еще огромное количество разного вооружения, вплоть до уничтожения спутников, мобильных ядерных систем, которые невозможно отследить. Это я к тому, что при таком противостоянии, чисто гипотетически, от Европы останется ядерная пустыня, США получат как минимум 50% ущерба территории, жертв будут миллиарды! И все это ради чего? Украины в НАТО? Или потому что не могут признать, что конфликт, который они спровоцировали, явно проигран? Потому что этим идиотам-политикам надо сохранить лицо? Честно говоря, настолько некомпетентной и тупой власти, как на данный момент на западе, я даже представить себе не мог. Меня также удивляет, насколько зависимыми и не суверенными оказались страны Европы. Это просто поразительно, что они буквально как марионетки пляшут под дудку США. Ведь все адекватные люди понимают, что от этого противостояния в первую очередь страдают страны Европы, а разрешение на удары по России дальнобойными ракетами устроил Байден не ради Украины, а ради испортить обещание Трампа остановить конфликт, но Европа, как зависимый наркоман, делает то, что им сказал дилер, и тоже дает разрешение на удары по России. И ведь для США это просто внутреннее политическое противостояние, хотя я бы задумался о адекватности демократов, что они намеренно ухудшают возможности собственного президента, которому придется с этим что-то делать, но зачем европейские страны в этом участвуют, объяснить, кроме как внешним контролем, невозможно.
Great comment, I'm super glad my Russian lessons are paying off and that I was able to read most sentences without needing to use a translator. A breath of fresh air to read comments like this, thank you.
Wrong, those hits wrecked whatever they hit, they weren't "duds" per se, due to shorter range they can use a heavier warhead or multiple warheads, filled with concrete or steel as the kinetic energy is more destructive by far than TNT. 15,000Km/hr impacts are savage So this was likely to be 4 warheads on one missile with each carrying 6 solid submunitions
@@Fanatic1704 Correct :) But as I said it was just one missile ;) Damage is gonna be brutal, ugh! :( At least 4 MIRVs were seen each with 6 submunitions, I haven't seen a vid so far that shows 6 but maybe it was *shrug* ❓
@@silverbladeTE bad quality video, it is 6 mirvs 6 warhead each, there is another source different angle, 6 by 6 out of clouds. Need to wait a few days, some good quality surveillance should be sold to media soon
@@Fanatic1704 Okydoky! :) yeah we're relying on iffy vids Wonder if they might actually use SS-18 missiles they are decommissioning? Now those could have a hell of a kinetic strike package, eeek!!!
@@andreasschmidt2739 Don't embarrass yourself... Google : "Hypersonic Missiles - Who owns them?". btw. Why didn't you mention Germany, Andreas Schmidt? Is something happening in Germany, once by far the biggest European power, that you don't like? Be honest, please... p.s. The main thing is that I am not pro-Russian at all, for me they are one (currently quarreling with each other) people! I'm just 100% Pro-Truth...I don't like tampering, even when it's in my favor.
Этоу тебя пустая строка чего-то у тебя неинформативного, ты кого то вытеснил ниже по ленте, я открыл тут только триста комментариев - и я их все слушаю в программе, и пишу тебе этот комментарийоб этом о том что ты занял чьё то место... Эти кто-то - они не будут прочитаны из-за таких как ты тут пишешь что-то бесполезное - бесполезная масса Никогда не мешай читать!
According to Scott Ritter and some ukie officials, it was a RS-26 "Rubezh" missile with a special MIRV warhead instead of the nuclear one - containing 6 packs of cluster munitions - that's the 6 "shotgun shots" that can be seen in the video - 1 missile, 6 reentry vehicle, each containing kinetic penetrators.
"By using the newest long range systems on a mass scale, the leadership of Russia clearly shows that there will be no compromise and no freezing. Complete demilitarization, denazification (shut down of Nazi parties and internment of their leaders), Russian control of Eastern and Southern Ukraine from Kharkov to Odessa at a minimum, the rest of Ukraine is tightly saturated with Russian military bases and security organizations, a friendly government comes into power in Ukraine and pursues a policy of good neighborliness (no NATO, no large Ukrainian army). Only on such a condition we are ready to preserve a significant part of Ukraine as an independent state." - Director of Institute of National Crises Studies, Nikolai Sorokin.
RS 26 is a MIRV medium range ICBM capable of carrying 4 1megaton nuclear warheads in each rocket. It travels at over Mach 10. It can also carry conventional explosives and has a range of about 4,000 miles. Carrying duds, it was just a shot over Ukraine's bow and will likely contain conventional explosives next time and perhaps nukes if Ukraine can't take the hint. This is how nuclear conflicts can start because each next step taken by both sides can be escalatory. As Keir Starmer says, we must defend Ukraine even if it risks nuclear war. Some people might perceive that as an insane way to think.
they weren't duds .... they were demonstrating the kinetic impact of hypersonic weapons. You don't need explosives with things travelling that fast ....
For reference Ukraine has nothing that can intercept an ICBM warhead at re-entery speed. The patriot missile is nowhere near fast enough to even attempt it. This is 5x more true if its a smaller MIRV falling on its target. Even the THAAD struggles with it. It they had been real warheads.... Ukraine would have lost 100,000s of people in minutes and millions in the comming weeks.
@@cdgncgn massive strikes on strong points along the fronline or anti air and air facilities with later on massive airstrikes might also do massive damage and escalate the war by alot.
Read somehwere that this ICBM/ballistic missile can be used as a carrier for multiple FAB's, anyone know if this is the case and which size and amount it can carry? If so there is no need at all for Russia to go nuclear, they can simply use heavy FAB's with this carrier system to get a similar effect and wipe Kiev of the map. Would not be surprised if this is the second thing that Putin is hinting on, if they keep escalating then they can escalate by doing this. He even mentioned that they will advise civilians in advance to leave the area. Imagine six FAB 5000's raining down on Kiev within 5 minutes after launch, together with a couple of more aimed at other major cities.
The author clearly did not see Putin's official statement about the strike on the Dnieper. There were no faulty or unexploded warheads. There was a defeat of deeply buried targets, which naturally did not give a picture of an external explosion. There, the combat units (in which there is practically no fuel) arrived at a speed of 10M.
Кто сказал что Российские межконтинентальные баллистические ракеты не летают ? Пока что прилетели без ядерного заряда, и пока только по Okrain. не одну из них не смогли сбить, думаю кое кому стоит задуматься,
Looks like 6 or so objects per missile, hard to distinguish due to the plasma thingy, look up how it lit up the sky. Plus look up at camera top, it is slowed down to 0.5! All impacts in 7 seconds ! Phew.
And now there's room in the warehouse for more Brand New Missiles This is a pretty smart "Russian Shovel" Approach How many Old missles does Russia have The thought of a "Tactical ICBM attack" never ever entered my thoughts The letters were always associated with Immediate DEATH...as a child
yeah, now imagine a world where NATO is free to stage IRBMs inside Ukraine - Russia would never allow nuclear weapons to be hidden in a country the size of Texas because a 300-second flight time is undetectable and unstoppable.
Experts advise they were not DUDS, went deeper and this video does not show explosions but there are other views that show explosions - turns out six main war heads that expanded to 36 according to Scott Ritter, former weapons inspector/military intel etc. - The War head was a bus for several war heads. It was a new missile, based on an older ICBM - this was an intermediate range. 1000 to 300 km distance.
Long range strikes is kinda expensive, scary yada-yada, but...could someone explain why one of the rockets hit an mayonnaise factory in Voronezh and yogurt factory in Belgorod? Is that intentionally or accidently? I dont understand what the point?
Electronic warfare, the Russians use it to "spoof" targets, make them appear as they are in 1 location but are really at another, or simply to spoof the targetting system of the missiles by making them think they're somewhere but really they're somewhere else, its very complicated but Russia is really advanced in terms of electronic warfare.
@@WeebUnionWU you ignored his truthful reporting where Russians hit themselves, supposedly, just like since 2014 in the Donbass. :) They did it all to themselves and US isnt involved, because it identifies itself as Uninvolved :)
@@cdgncgn Thats an ridiculous claim, its doesnt make any sense. Expects could pinpoint the launch location to 25m+- accuracy. Even REGULAR people from donbass region could guess trajectory and type of explosive just by visual and sound.
With the kinetic energy alone i fail to understand why they didnt used on the dams above Kyiv...the war has been going on too long enough for the we are brothers narrative to continue
Probably this attack had no destruction purpose, it was merely a warning after the use of atacms in russian territory. It's kinda scary to think that these small series of explosions could've been all nukes...
Quân đội Ukraine nghĩ rằng Nga sẽ làm thế nên họ triển khai một lực lượng lớn ở phía Bắc để chặn Nga. Vì thế, Nga tấn công thẳng vào thành phố và có bước đột phá lớn (đến giờ theo các nguồn tin mới nhất, quân Nga đã chiếm 50% thành phố)
To take high rise buildings (= take advantage in many areas) + because ukranian defence alow russians to push inside Kurahove without facing strong resistance (i mean - eastern flank of multi lair defences was just smashed in one week)
They seem to attack in “bulges”, perhaps to keep length of engagement line long? Direct encirclements would shorten contact area & allow more defenders & lessen the stretching of defenses. Just my opinion. Weeb’s explanations of causing controlled retreats with heavy losses makes a lot of sense. No chance for good defensive positions or resupply on their part.
russia wants to force ukraine to retreat on narrow reatreat routes where it takes long to get out and where russia has fire control to inflict heavy casulties on them without taking casulties on their own
Этоу тебя пустая строка чего-то у тебя неинформативного, ты кого то вытеснил ниже по ленте, я открыл тут только триста комментариев - и я их все слушаю в программе, и пишу тебе этот комментарийоб этом о том что ты занял чьё то место... Эти кто-то - они не будут прочитаны из-за таких как ты тут пишешь что-то бесполезное - бесполезная масса Никогда не мешай читать!
11:54 "...at the same time it can carry four warheads each with up to 250 kilograms of explosives..." You probably meant to say "...at the same time it can carry four (nuclear) warheads each with up to 250 kilotons yield..." The yield is measured in terms of TNT equivalence.
Thank you. You used to make good, informative and meaningful videos, now thy are just guesses that are unrealistic and boring. Hope you review your content and go back to your much interesting and informative videos. Thank you
Starmers interview where he basically says nuclear war is a price worth paying to support Ukraine is the craziest thing I've ever seen from a British leader. I am so deeply ashamed of my country. These people's required corruption in supporting mass migration has led to leaders who are totally ignorant and incapable 😢
There are many towns and cities in Britain where the proportion of Muslims is higher than the proportion of Russians in Mariupol etc. Where is the invasion and where is the liberation?
Only 65% of Britain is British - 35% are foreign born. And Starmer is happy to keep increasing the population. I'm terrified of the number of actual British and how low that would be.
@@arostwocentsIslamic Kingdom of UK😂😂😂
Reap what you sow, your government has been spineless for longer than you think.
He is not british.
He is a member of The Family, even if only by rights of marriage.
And yet there are still some silly people out there who think Russia is bluffing, and can be defeated with conventional weapons.
Putin is bluffing. The whole time Iskanders were and are nuclear capable. They don't need ICBM MIRVs to stike Ukraine.
Russia is not bluffing, Russia is desperate. Maybe, Russia should think about the consequences before starting a war. Go on Russia, push the button. Do I dare you.
@@meetmehalfway7982 Look at this brave man. To challenge Russia you don't have to croak from afar. Come to Ukraine.
@@Vavilon77777 lol indeed. Probably yet another person who doesn't like his life and wants to take us with him.
@@yianpap6093 I bet you have taken nothing from anyone, I bet you live off the state and work the back allies for food.
The message had been delivered this time by Russia
but not to the right place or person..
That they are desperate?
Desperate for what bud ? 😂 Isn't clownsky and west the ones desperate for more ammo , troops, money and to hold any ground ?? @@cyruslupercal9493
for what bud ? 😂 Isn't clownsky and west the ones 'desperate' for more ammo , troops, money and to hold any ground ?? @cyruslupercal9493
@@cyruslupercal9493Desperate for what bud ? 😂 Isn't clownsky and NATO the ones desperate for more ammo , troops, money and to hold any ground ?? @cyruslupercal9493
A missile hitting you in less than 5 minutes 🤔 let that sink in .
8 kilometers per second
Before it sinks in we are already hit
That's only if you can detect it in time. A hypersonic stealth nuclear missile may even be harder to detect in time.
@thetreekeeper143 even if you could detect it, it doesn't matter, as it is highly unlikely that an AD system could even react to it.
Dayum...thats even faster than a Taco Bell burrito supreme. 😮
imagine the tension in NATO bunkers, when ICBM launches were detected and confirmed ...
I bet the sweating were perfuse.
Why not intercepted?🤔
Sphincters were clenched
@@beba5865 No time, as the trajectory was very short.
Besides ... I don't think NATO is actually capable of intercepting ICBMs, at all.
@@beba5865impossible to intercept
@@ZappyOhI believe the THAAD is the only system designed to intercept ICBMs and there are only a handful of it
Lets condemn NATO
It's actually ZATO🇫🇲🇮🇱.
As lgbtq+!
@@Fridaey13txhOktober Two more ++, if you will sir.
Condemn it for what? Russia is larping as a Nazi.
Oh those flying shovels
Missile defense that is able to intercept an ICBM is expensive af to the point the US themselves only owns a couple dozen interceptors. They are highly unlikely to "waste" a couple of them on protecting the Ukies. Especially given that the ICBMs vastly outnumber the interceptors.
@@mnk9073 it's not just expensive,its nonexisting..
Americans haven't a hypersonic missile interceptors🤭
and if they had any, they woudl save them for themselves.
Russia is probably using old ICBMs that are scrapped anyway.
@@NissaraKandy
They have yet to successfully test a hypersonic missile.
I visited Dnipro in December 2003 as part of a DoD Nunn-Lugar inspection team. There's a factory there that produces missiles. It made the missiles that were transported to Cuba in 1962. I would have thought the industrial area of Dnipro would have been hit long ago, as it's an obvious target.
As for the ICBM, I would have targeted Kiev, not Dnipro. The ICBM was a demonstration shot. Let Zelensky and his Nazis see what an ICBM strike, even without a nuclear warhead, looks like. It was six MIRV warheads coming down like lightning,
Missile plant is valid target, if you want to make sure that all long range missiles in Ukraine are not made on its territory. Both politically and strategically.
@Fredzerra2 I didn't say it wasn't. I'm surprised it would still exist after a thousand days of smo.
@@genes.3285The Yuzhmash facility had been hit by the RF on several occasions since 2022 by the cruise and short range ballistic missiles. But not on this scale, by the ICBMs with the MIRV warheads. This site also has extensive underground facilities, a new target for a new strike. These are just my thoughts.
@@AK-kz6wcInteresting. I still have a couple of small mementos from my visit in 2003.
They wanted ATACMS. Now they will get seriously ATTACKED…
@@elysianfields1671 😂😂😂😂🤣...Mdrrrrr
Another excellent report Weeb. Thanks mate
Seems like Russia is launching another ICBM right now, Ukrainian telegram channels are in panic mode
@MissingThe90s Again with no nuclear warhead!
@@andreasschmidt2739No need, bro..feelin' lucky?!
Russian roulette
@@andreasschmidt2739 Why should Russia nuke its own territory?
@@andreasschmidt2739 Naturally. They have conventional weapons with the destructive power of a nuclear bomb. If you're in Europe, pray they don't lob it at your country.
big mistake to attack Russia with ATACMS
action created conteraction
Why because now they are attack by missile with no explosive?
@@rainer7210 Newton law Nr. 3.
@@phenix4195you don't get it? oh god.... 🤦
@@phenix4195 These small explosions could've been all nukes and it arrived at the target in just 5 minutes with no chance of interception, i think it's quite clear that this was a warning.
Good luck when they decide to fill these missiles with nuclear warheads...
I have been waiting for this update on alleged use of ICBM on DNIPRO
Dnepropetrovsk
@MissingThe90s thank you for correcting me ‼️ you mean Dnipropetrovsk is not part of DNIPRO ‼️🔥
Ekaterinoslav @@MissingThe90s
@@MissingThe90s Ekaterinoslav.
@@vatnikxxi7717 Call it Dnepropetrovsk or Yekaterinoslav, it's rightful Russian land
If true, it appears russias icbms work, and europe should be worried
These were not any ICBM-s but old most probably SS12 tactical missiles from late 60-ys And yes , of course that they still work...
did you doubt they would work? This is exactly the idiocy that got us here
Test laungh of US minuteman and UK trident failed. This hit in intented target, impossible say how many Ru tried to laungh. Ru is good building working weapons.
if that was question to anyone then we are really lead by people with big challenges in head, ICBMs was used in tests hundreds of times, they have them from beginning of ICBMs, they are leader in that category and current ones they have are most advanced in world, of course they work, this was just warning that we are second before beginning of nuclear war
As if western air defense systems can stop hyper-sonic missiles how delusional they're undermine Ru's missiles effectiveness just because their failed
These escalations are going to end up in WW3. Insane!!!
I don't think the western leaders are willing to sacrifice their comfortable lives engaging in a nuclear war with Russia, however i do think it's quite possible that we're going to see a nuclear explosion in Ukraine, i don't think Zelensky is going to back off on its missile strikes.
Look at it from positive perspective...Finally housing prices are gonna be solved
And to think it all started with handing out cookies in Maidan Square.
@@stephenvanwoert2447 Satan sent his best to Ukraine in 2014, that’s for sure. 👍
Biden has a care taker government, he should not be permitted to go escalate foreign tensions and conflicts before he steps away
Play stupid games win stupid prize
Thanks for update
Intercontinental ballistic shovel (nuclear warhead not included)
We got Russians launching ICBMs before GTA 6
GTA 6? I am waiting for Half Life 3 for 20 years now.
@Xeno7771 lmfao I just realized the still waiting on half life 3 community is fuckin dead omggg noooooo I'm old plz I wanna see it In my life
It was a test on a actual target and to send a message to Ukraine and NATO
And the test subject is ukraine.
Hardened bunkers under Dnipro Yuzmash, the same as those in Azovstal, and used for NATO command - that was the kinetic strike target
Would love to see / know the BDA behind the strike
An excellent response from Putin. A simple demonstration… a demonstration of restraint.
Not really. It was lucky NATO didn't respond in kind with actual nuclear warheads when they detected the launches. This is foolish escalation from both sides.
@@somethingsomething8511 Guess what, there is a reason why all NATO country embassies in keev were issuing warnings yesterday. The russians TOLD them that they'll strike back.
@@somethingsomething8511 agree they're stupid escalation, but I would rather say NATO was lucky Russia's ICBM wasn't carrying nukes.
@ you mean that you believe that NATO would start ww3 in support of a country that is too corrupt to belong to its alliance? Thats very telling of what the western alliances actual intent is…. And of course they wont… but do get back to me next week if im wrong, and Nato does start ww3.
@@somethingsomething8511that has to be the dumbest response.
Russia has already said, they see any of that bullshit anywhere, every single capital city in Europe will have nuclear weapon hit them in less than 10 mins.
NATO isn't going to do SHIT.
Russian brigades are near 100% while Ukrainian ones are often depleted especially since Ukraine prefer to form new bridages at a cost of reinforcing the existing ones.
Yep, yet they keep dreaming of making new battalions left right and center :D :D
Well we are hearing that for about 3 years. UkRAiNe iS dePlted
@@silentstorm3467 1. They say it themselvs
2.This is the reason why Ukraine kidnap people from the streets - in order to keep numbers at relatively sustainable lvl
@@silentstorm3467depleted doesn't necessarily mean they no longer have anyone fighting, it means they are losing more men than they can recruit, which explains why Ukraine was conscripting pretty much every male at this point
@@silentstorm3467 And they are
Thats Oreshnik hypersonic MRBM mach 10/ 3.4kilometers per sec.
Weeb
You’re effing brilliant you are so good. I don’t bother to watch any other channels except for military channel.
That’s from an Aussie
Bloody brilliant mate
In order of viewing: Weeb and Miitary for daily tactical updates, History Legends for operational, The Duran for strategic.
History legends is a joke, man.
@@ElderLyons-zk1rw The Duran is a bit hit and miss.
Надо пояснить, что этот удар был предупреждением, и предупреждением не для Украины, а для западных стран, так как применили РС-26, у которой дальность полета от 2 до 6 тысяч километров в управляемом режиме с точностью удара до 150 метров, которая может нести до 4 отдельных боеголовок с собственным наведением и термоядерным зарядом, смысла нет. Одной такой ракеты с заряженными боеголовками хватит на крупный город, например Берлин или Лондон, сбить которую практически невозможно, скорость самой ракеты 6,7 километра в секунду, скорость отдельных боеголовок гиперзвуковые и которые маневрируют, единственный шанс их сбить только на старте, чего никто сделать не сможет, так как запускаются они с мобильных платформ. Все это в противостоянии с Украиной излишне, и поэтому смысл был в предупреждении не Украине, а именно странам НАТО и с учетом новой ядерной доктрины России, где уже прямо обозначили, что нападение на Россию по средствам марионеток типа Украины будет расцениваться как совместное нападение и ответ будет соответствующим.
Вообще, я бы на месте западных граждан был сильно благодарен Путину за его сдержанность и благоразумие, потому что западные «лидеры» путают добрую волю и сдержанность со слабостью, и поэтому полагают, что Россия блефует в угрозах ответного удара. И, честно говоря, мне искренне жаль видеть, насколько отупели западные политики, эти идиоты в попытке доказать свое превосходство над миром реально могут довести конфликт до третьей мировой, потому что при всем огромном терпении Путина оно рано или поздно кончится. Проблема в том, что в противостоянии России с НАТО или США не будет войны танками, самолетами, не будет иметь смысл, у кого больше солдат и как они обучены, все очень быстро перерастет в обмен ядерными ударами. Просто поразительно, что Запад, постоянно повышая эскалацию в конфликте с Россией, не осознает последствий своих действий. Я не собираюсь никого пугать и надеюсь, что все это только гипотетически, но Россия в ядерном противостоянии превосходит НАТО и США вместе взятых, размер России - это стратегическое превосходство, она огромна и нанести столько ударов, чтобы уничтожить все, просто не получится, Россия обладает не только самым большим и самым современным ядерным арсеналом, но и всеми видами доставки, более того, она обладает лучшей системой ПВО, обновленными ракетами, ядерными торпедами «Посейдон», которые уничтожают портовые города и аналогов которых ни у кого нет, системой «Периметр» или, как на западе называют, «Мертвая рука», которая автоматически наносит ответный удар, и еще огромное количество разного вооружения, вплоть до уничтожения спутников, мобильных ядерных систем, которые невозможно отследить. Это я к тому, что при таком противостоянии, чисто гипотетически, от Европы останется ядерная пустыня, США получат как минимум 50% ущерба территории, жертв будут миллиарды! И все это ради чего? Украины в НАТО? Или потому что не могут признать, что конфликт, который они спровоцировали, явно проигран? Потому что этим идиотам-политикам надо сохранить лицо? Честно говоря, настолько некомпетентной и тупой власти, как на данный момент на западе, я даже представить себе не мог.
Меня также удивляет, насколько зависимыми и не суверенными оказались страны Европы. Это просто поразительно, что они буквально как марионетки пляшут под дудку США. Ведь все адекватные люди понимают, что от этого противостояния в первую очередь страдают страны Европы, а разрешение на удары по России дальнобойными ракетами устроил Байден не ради Украины, а ради испортить обещание Трампа остановить конфликт, но Европа, как зависимый наркоман, делает то, что им сказал дилер, и тоже дает разрешение на удары по России. И ведь для США это просто внутреннее политическое противостояние, хотя я бы задумался о адекватности демократов, что они намеренно ухудшают возможности собственного президента, которому придется с этим что-то делать, но зачем европейские страны в этом участвуют, объяснить, кроме как внешним контролем, невозможно.
@@Vit_Kon прям по полочкам :)
Great comment
2,5 км в секунду скорость чуток ошиблись, 10 махов послушайте выступление В.В.Путина.
Great comment, I'm super glad my Russian lessons are paying off and that I was able to read most sentences without needing to use a translator. A breath of fresh air to read comments like this, thank you.
Agree, Russia is not my enemy. It's time to talk and get back to common sense.
Wrong, those hits wrecked whatever they hit, they weren't "duds" per se, due to shorter range they can use a heavier warhead or multiple warheads, filled with concrete or steel as the kinetic energy is more destructive by far than TNT. 15,000Km/hr impacts are savage
So this was likely to be 4 warheads on one missile with each carrying 6 solid submunitions
each of 6x6x35kg at 20M has kinetic energy of FAB250 with 100kg of TNT, and it was ONE icbm with multiple warheads, not six
@@Fanatic1704 Correct :) But as I said it was just one missile ;)
Damage is gonna be brutal, ugh! :(
At least 4 MIRVs were seen each with 6 submunitions, I haven't seen a vid so far that shows 6 but maybe it was *shrug* ❓
@@silverbladeTE1 video shows 6 volleys landing in the space of about 10 seconds
@@silverbladeTE bad quality video, it is 6 mirvs 6 warhead each, there is another source different angle, 6 by 6 out of clouds. Need to wait a few days, some good quality surveillance should be sold to media soon
@@Fanatic1704 Okydoky! :)
yeah we're relying on iffy vids
Wonder if they might actually use SS-18 missiles they are decommissioning?
Now those could have a hell of a kinetic strike package, eeek!!!
That missile can strike anywhere in Ukraine AND anywhere in the NATO EU states as well. Yeah,I'm talking to you Starmer and Macron.
@AXS512 and US, British and French missiles can strike anywhere in Russia...
@@andreasschmidt2739Go ahead. Russia has huge territory.
@@andreasschmidt2739 do you understand how dense EU to compare to Russia?
@@andreasschmidt2739 Don't embarrass yourself... Google : "Hypersonic Missiles - Who owns them?".
btw. Why didn't you mention Germany, Andreas Schmidt? Is something happening in Germany, once by far the biggest European power, that you don't like? Be honest, please... p.s. The main thing is that I am not pro-Russian at all, for me they are one (currently quarreling with each other) people! I'm just 100% Pro-Truth...I don't like tampering, even when it's in my favor.
@@andreasschmidt2739 They clearly don't teach you geography wherever you went to school.
Thanks Weeb!
Этоу тебя пустая строка чего-то у тебя неинформативного, ты кого то вытеснил ниже по ленте, я открыл тут только триста комментариев - и я их все слушаю в программе, и пишу тебе этот комментарийоб этом о том что ты занял чьё то место...
Эти кто-то - они не будут прочитаны из-за таких как ты тут пишешь что-то бесполезное - бесполезная масса
Никогда не мешай читать!
According to Scott Ritter and some ukie officials, it was a RS-26 "Rubezh" missile with a special MIRV warhead instead of the nuclear one - containing 6 packs of cluster munitions - that's the 6 "shotgun shots" that can be seen in the video - 1 missile, 6 reentry vehicle, each containing kinetic penetrators.
the russian name is oreshnik. rubezh must be another missile.
"By using the newest long range systems on a mass scale, the leadership of Russia clearly shows that there will be no compromise and no freezing. Complete demilitarization, denazification (shut down of Nazi parties and internment of their leaders), Russian control of Eastern and Southern Ukraine from Kharkov to Odessa at a minimum, the rest of Ukraine is tightly saturated with Russian military bases and security organizations, a friendly government comes into power in Ukraine and pursues a policy of good neighborliness (no NATO, no large Ukrainian army). Only on such a condition we are ready to preserve a significant part of Ukraine as an independent state." - Director of Institute of National Crises Studies, Nikolai Sorokin.
been waiting for this
Duds, really do your research MIRVs with multiple conventional warheads one missile fired the warning being this is just conventional warheads
RS 26 is a MIRV medium range ICBM capable of carrying 4 1megaton nuclear warheads in each rocket. It travels at over Mach 10. It can also carry conventional explosives and has a range of about 4,000 miles. Carrying duds, it was just a shot over Ukraine's bow and will likely contain conventional explosives next time and perhaps nukes if Ukraine can't take the hint. This is how nuclear conflicts can start because each next step taken by both sides can be escalatory. As Keir Starmer says, we must defend Ukraine even if it risks nuclear war. Some people might perceive that as an insane way to think.
they weren't duds .... they were demonstrating the kinetic impact of hypersonic weapons. You don't need explosives with things travelling that fast ....
Zelensky embarrassed that he couldnt stop icbm.
Looks like 6 MIRVs with 6 submunitions each.
For reference Ukraine has nothing that can intercept an ICBM warhead at re-entery speed. The patriot missile is nowhere near fast enough to even attempt it. This is 5x more true if its a smaller MIRV falling on its target. Even the THAAD struggles with it. It they had been real warheads.... Ukraine would have lost 100,000s of people in minutes and millions in the comming weeks.
THAAD cant do snything, it might be usable vs short ranged non maneuvering targets.
All of NATO, including the US, has nothing capable of intercepting Russian ICBMs.
@@cdgncgn massive strikes on strong points along the fronline or anti air and air facilities with later on massive airstrikes might also do massive damage and escalate the war by alot.
Tak for opdatering
Read somehwere that this ICBM/ballistic missile can be used as a carrier for multiple FAB's, anyone know if this is the case and which size and amount it can carry? If so there is no need at all for Russia to go nuclear, they can simply use heavy FAB's with this carrier system to get a similar effect and wipe Kiev of the map. Would not be surprised if this is the second thing that Putin is hinting on, if they keep escalating then they can escalate by doing this. He even mentioned that they will advise civilians in advance to leave the area. Imagine six FAB 5000's raining down on Kiev within 5 minutes after launch, together with a couple of more aimed at other major cities.
It wasn't ICBM. Russians used "Oreshnik", new hypersonic IRBM
They dont know it.
Excellent video today and very instructive
Regime change in kiev coming soon
Overdue
Thank you 👍🏻
The author clearly did not see Putin's official statement about the strike on the Dnieper. There were no faulty or unexploded warheads. There was a defeat of deeply buried targets, which naturally did not give a picture of an external explosion. There, the combat units (in which there is practically no fuel) arrived at a speed of 10M.
looks like kinetic warhead MIRV
Кто сказал что Российские межконтинентальные баллистические ракеты не летают ? Пока что прилетели без ядерного заряда, и пока только по Okrain. не одну из них не смогли сбить, думаю кое кому стоит задуматься,
Putin skazal, što eto novaja raketa, Orešnik, srednej daľnosti.
Trump: I'll stop the war
Biden: Watch this
I believe the RS-26 can also carry the Avangard Hypersonic Glide Vehicle.
Thanks for explaining that the Russian icbm did not carry explosive warheads, first I heard of this.
Eu ficaria feliz se o próximo destino de um desses fosse o Reino Unido
Ukraine is playing with fire may someone tell me what ends up happening when you play with fire
Things are spiraling out of control.
The God Emp is coming back to bring peace
😂
According to some Russian sources Russians already entered Velikaya Novosyolka
Looks like 6 or so objects per missile, hard to distinguish due to the plasma thingy, look up how it lit up the sky. Plus look up at camera top, it is slowed down to 0.5! All impacts in 7 seconds ! Phew.
Got the link?
@@redherring6154 where ?
Vladimir Putin the Great, defender of the free world!
I dont think they were duds, they might be clusters
They were not "duds", they sent a strong warning to the entire west. Did you see any get shot down??
you mean MIRVs. Conventional.
Great analysis
great analysis👏🙏
That was one ICBM with 6 Mirv busses with 6 warheads!!!!!!
Как высадка космодесанта выглядит)
Как будто пришельцы из "Войны миров", где они молниеносно десантируются в треножники.
The message should be sended elsewhere..
Millionaire Draft Dodger was high off yesterday ATACMS....let's see how they will weather this storm
Dud's? No conventional low yield.
You look at the whole long front from the south and up, and then you see how small Kursk is. And that's where Bidensky sent all the elite units.
And now there's room in the warehouse for more Brand New Missiles
This is a pretty smart
"Russian Shovel"
Approach
How many Old missles does Russia have
The thought of a
"Tactical ICBM attack" never ever entered my thoughts
The letters were always associated with Immediate DEATH...as a child
Can you give a brighter color to the regions border
Those are dotted white lines. Difficult to spot indeed, especially when they coincide with subdivisions of warzones created by Weeb.
That at the end looks like a final warning.
Putin getting low on red paint
yeah, now imagine a world where NATO is free to stage IRBMs inside Ukraine - Russia would never allow nuclear weapons to be hidden in a country the size of Texas because a 300-second flight time is undetectable and unstoppable.
Experts advise they were not DUDS, went deeper and this video does not show explosions but there are other views that show explosions - turns out six main war heads that expanded to 36 according to Scott Ritter, former weapons inspector/military intel etc. - The War head was a bus for several war heads. It was a new missile, based on an older ICBM - this was an intermediate range. 1000 to 300 km distance.
Long range strikes is kinda expensive, scary yada-yada, but...could someone explain why one of the rockets hit an mayonnaise factory in Voronezh and yogurt factory in Belgorod?
Is that intentionally or accidently?
I dont understand what the point?
Electronic warfare, the Russians use it to "spoof" targets, make them appear as they are in 1 location but are really at another, or simply to spoof the targetting system of the missiles by making them think they're somewhere but really they're somewhere else, its very complicated but Russia is really advanced in terms of electronic warfare.
@@WeebUnionWU That's impressive. The downside is these missiles could then end up hitting civilians. But that's on the Ukrainians, not the Russians.
@@WeebUnionWU you ignored his truthful reporting where Russians hit themselves, supposedly, just like since 2014 in the Donbass. :) They did it all to themselves and US isnt involved, because it identifies itself as Uninvolved :)
@@cdgncgn Thats an ridiculous claim, its doesnt make any sense. Expects could pinpoint the launch location to 25m+- accuracy.
Even REGULAR people from donbass region could guess trajectory and type of explosive just by visual and sound.
Thanks :)
With the kinetic energy alone i fail to understand why they didnt used on the dams above Kyiv...the war has been going on too long enough for the we are brothers narrative to continue
I would say this is a true test of them, you have them sitting around for awhile, let's see if still works. But the next one?
Why duds
Probably this attack had no destruction purpose, it was merely a warning after the use of atacms in russian territory.
It's kinda scary to think that these small series of explosions could've been all nukes...
Not duds. Rods of God. Kinetic energy projectiles.
@@francoarca2122 Yuzhmash factory will tell a different story
A warning
@@Wild_Cat Possibly just to see if they could effectively evade air defences and as a stern warning.
we call it orbital bombardment
It appears that firing ICBMs on a sovereign country is bad on a currency. $1 USD = 102 Rubles.
Why are they pushing in Kurahove if they can encricle it by connecting with the northern flank near Andriivka?
Quân đội Ukraine nghĩ rằng Nga sẽ làm thế nên họ triển khai một lực lượng lớn ở phía Bắc để chặn Nga. Vì thế, Nga tấn công thẳng vào thành phố và có bước đột phá lớn (đến giờ theo các nguồn tin mới nhất, quân Nga đã chiếm 50% thành phố)
I was wondering that myself MJ. It looks like a large encirclement could be done.
To take high rise buildings (= take advantage in many areas) + because ukranian defence alow russians to push inside Kurahove without facing strong resistance (i mean - eastern flank of multi lair defences was just smashed in one week)
They seem to attack in “bulges”, perhaps to keep length of engagement line long? Direct encirclements would shorten contact area & allow more defenders & lessen the stretching of defenses. Just my opinion. Weeb’s explanations of causing controlled retreats with heavy losses makes a lot of sense. No chance for good defensive positions or resupply on their part.
russia wants to force ukraine to retreat on narrow reatreat routes where it takes long to get out and where russia has fire control to inflict heavy casulties on them without taking casulties on their own
My question is why is Russia being so lenient? NATO is not holding back why is Russia.
потому что Россия с Богом, а запад под сатаной
Be honest with yourself, They are both holding back and rightfully so... No one wants nuclear war.
Zoom in closer, please, on the map when talking about each advance so we can get better idea what's at each location
I guess the duds were meant to reinforce the nuclear war threats.
Perché i sottotitoli non si possono mettere in questo video?
looks like Russia has some cool weapons the west didn't know about !!
ZOV!!!!
I miss subtitles.
11:55+ !!
Этоу тебя пустая строка чего-то у тебя неинформативного, ты кого то вытеснил ниже по ленте, я открыл тут только триста комментариев - и я их все слушаю в программе, и пишу тебе этот комментарийоб этом о том что ты занял чьё то место...
Эти кто-то - они не будут прочитаны из-за таких как ты тут пишешь что-то бесполезное - бесполезная масса
Никогда не мешай читать!
people say redline but where is the red line ?
I can't see it
under the table ?
I cannot see how the salient south-west of Pokrovsk can be left in ukrainian hands in a long-term solution...
👍👍👍👍
Keep strong Russia
11:54 "...at the same time it can carry four warheads each with up to 250 kilograms of explosives..."
You probably meant to say "...at the same time it can carry four (nuclear) warheads each with up to 250 kilotons yield..."
The yield is measured in terms of TNT equivalence.
Thank you. You used to make good, informative and meaningful videos, now thy are just guesses that are unrealistic and boring. Hope you review your content and go back to your much interesting and informative videos. Thank you
Hoje está sem legendas !
As legendas chegarão mais tarde. Google necessita tempo para creá-las.
Уже работают, и я открыл под тремя точками и читаю оттуда - мне программа читает текст
Footage looks reversed.
Only in Kursk region ukrayinian Nazi lost more an 34.390 troops and 215 tanks.
Go Putin
🇺🇸🇨🇱