Can someone relate this Google v Lloyd Judgement with Dworkin's interpretive theory and what might Judge Hercules would do in such position. ? Is this case decided on Policy rather Principle? Judges hardly went betond the RULES ?
@@Thegrumpycoach already done bro. . .i want to have more analysis of more people like them. . . Definitly people on this thread must have indepth knowledge of the case. . .judge Hercules would have decided the cases differently. . .in the complete Judgement Lord Legatt did emphasized on Rules and Prinicples but he totally ignored the principle in 3rd Interpretive stage. . .!!! The decisison is opposite to what dworkin has presented Judges literally did the Linguistic intrepretation and the Judgement was not "Fit" as many of the citations which Lord Legatt gave in prior cases and relevent legislations he didnot considered any of them. . And ideal judge would have considered DPA 2018 art 164 as it only clarifies the meaning of Material and Non Material damage. 😘😘😘 above all what was the Prinivple motive behind legislating DPA itself. . .!!!
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
Can someone relate this Google v Lloyd Judgement with Dworkin's interpretive theory and what might Judge Hercules would do in such position. ?
Is this case decided on Policy rather Principle?
Judges hardly went betond the RULES ?
Why would someone do your homework for you? Good luck with your Jurisprudence Part A.
@@Thegrumpycoach already done bro. . .i want to have more analysis of more people like them. . . Definitly people on this thread must have indepth knowledge of the case. . .judge Hercules would have decided the cases differently. . .in the complete Judgement Lord Legatt did emphasized on Rules and Prinicples but he totally ignored the principle in 3rd Interpretive stage. . .!!! The decisison is opposite to what dworkin has presented Judges literally did the Linguistic intrepretation and the Judgement was not "Fit" as many of the citations which Lord Legatt gave in prior cases and relevent legislations he didnot considered any of them. . And ideal judge would have considered DPA 2018 art 164 as it only clarifies the meaning of Material and Non Material damage. 😘😘😘 above all what was the Prinivple motive behind legislating DPA itself. . .!!!