A New Window for PBH Dark Matter (Due to Delayed Hawking Radiation)? | Alexandre & Thoss

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 сен 2024
  • Ana Alexandre and Valentin Thoss tell us about their recent papers examining the consequences of a potential "memory burden" effect on decaying primordial blackholes (PBHs).
    This memory burden effect would be a consequence of quantum gravity and would substantially slow down the Hawking evaporation of blackholes. The consequences for primordial blackholes would be very important because it would open a whole window of PBH masses as dark matter candidates. (Masses that are normally ignored because PBHs of these masses are presumed to have decayed by today.)
    All fundamental physicists would agree that Hawking radiation must breakdown at some point at/before a blackhole reaches the Planck mass. This proposed memory burden effect goes a step further and claims that the breakdown must happen no later than when a blackhole has decayed to half of its original mass. This is not universally agreed upon, but it's still worth examining the consequences if it is true.
    Ana: / ana-alexandre-a13548197
    Valentin: www.mpe.mpg.de...
    Ana's paper: arxiv.org/abs/...
    Valentin's paper: arxiv.org/abs/...
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 1

  • @talks_curator728
    @talks_curator728 2 часа назад +1

    *Index to Key Parts of the Talk*
    [00:00] Intro comments by Shaun
    [01:30] Brief opening comments by Valentin
    [02:18] Two takeaways to remember by Ana
    [02:50] Getting into the background
    [07:45] Black hole evaporation; “memory burden” effect
    [14:32] How well accepted is the memory burden effect by experts in its field?
    [17:34] New parameter space for PBH DM
    [21:06] Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
    [22:24] Relaxing constraints with memory burden
    [26:51] 4 Constraints (sections 2.5-2.8 in 2402.17823)
    [27:41] Constraints from galactic gamma ray emission
    [32:22] The other 3 constraints
    [37:42] The landscape of constraints
    [38:53] Combined constraints plot (Fig. 1 in 2402.17823)
    [42:18] Discussion re lower bound on the mass
    [43:40] Where to next?