the form of the talk matches the subject. But i dont understund why the should do Q&A in the midle of the talk when they have not yet understood the complete subject. Thats why most tech q&a leave questions at the end. But i admire the coordination they try to achive in common knowledge .each person is there is a little replica but the coordinator is the presenter . they dont seem to leave him make progress
great talk!
the form of the talk matches the subject. But i dont understund why the should do Q&A in the midle of the talk when they have not yet understood the complete subject. Thats why most tech q&a leave questions at the end. But i admire the coordination they try to achive in common knowledge .each person is there is a little replica but the coordinator is the presenter . they dont seem to leave him make progress
the talk is eventually consitent
great stuff, but a what a frigging annoying audience