Did he say at 20:20 that transactions always make right, despite readers see inconsistent data. I wonder how is it possible? Your transactions start by reading some data, your transactions involve readings and if they read data in transition, non-atomic, when some data arrived but other part did not, and therefore inconsistent, then you cannot ensure consistent data written by the transaction.
I haven't gotten to that part yet, but doesn't the name "transaction" just refer to an atomic operation over a few objects, but doesn't say anything about the isolation of those transactions?
Wow this is absolutely the best speaker and speech I have found on this topic. Perfect breadth and depth at the same time! Thank you!
Baseball analogies start at 10:40
a tip : you can watch series at Flixzone. Me and my gf have been using them for watching all kinds of movies during the lockdown.
@Charles Maison definitely, I have been using Flixzone} for months myself =)
Did he say at 20:20 that transactions always make right, despite readers see inconsistent data. I wonder how is it possible? Your transactions start by reading some data, your transactions involve readings and if they read data in transition, non-atomic, when some data arrived but other part did not, and therefore inconsistent, then you cannot ensure consistent data written by the transaction.
I haven't gotten to that part yet, but doesn't the name "transaction" just refer to an atomic operation over a few objects, but doesn't say anything about the isolation of those transactions?
Ooops 4 year old comment, whatup
Ah...I've been looking for something that explains baseball in a way that someone with some CS training might understand
man this was the least funny set of Lui CK . Thanks for the lecture