@@djordjesurtov3995 I like the post launch story for Cold War they gave us meaning to each season rather than here’s skins and a battle pass and new maps with no story significance but they left the campaign way to open ended
This story feels kinda meh to me. I didn’t have super high expectations, but with all the marketing around presidents, Saddam Hussein, conspiracies, and a secret organization within the CIA, I was expecting some real answers-especially to those BO2 flashbacks. But we didn’t really get much. It was pretty obvious Harrow was the villain; she’s a high-ranking CIA official and a new character, so it felt like they made her the mole just to have someone to point to, without it actually being anyone significant.
I agree, the story is really mid compared to the original BO1 and BO2, they could make this a lot more interesting but I guess they have to save some stuff so they can milk it later at whatever multiplayer mode they are doing. They can even fill a lot of interesting stories using the Mason timeline when he disappeared after Panama... but yeah.. they really choose to be safe with their writing, no main character dead, we don't even know for sure that Jane is really dead in the ending because it did the fade to black and " 3 weeks later " which is one of the worst ways to tell the story. I'm disappointed but at least it's a bit better than that new MW3.
I have so many questions from this campaign: 1. Adler -> worked in Advanced Technology after 1984 did he learn about Cradle? (If so he should have some knowledge on Case/Pantheon?) 2. Pantheon Agent on the call with the Guild? Was it Jackson Caine?? Voice Analysis 3. Why was Pantheon handing the Cradle to Saddam Hussein? 4. Who is "the Voice" during Emergence? Was it Jane? 5. 4 Directors in Advanced Technology responsible for the development of Cradle? Executive Director = Livingstone knew about this and if so why did he authorize this development of a CIA funded bioweapon? 6. Case volunteered for the Cradle? Why?? Consequences for sharing about Advanced Technology and Cradle? Why? Who drilled this into head? 7. What does the Cradle really do to a human? We seen overly aggressive behaviors and ability to be manipulated 8. Why did Case trip out when ending Gusev and Jane? 9. Separation? Where did Adler get this from? Did he had ties with Advanced Technology to attain this? This didn't look like MK Ultra from Bell's case. So I don't think its the same. 10. Who killed Jane's parents? Why were they killed? Why did Black authorize this assassination? Did Harrow's parents knew about Pantheon long before during 1960s? Does this mean Emerson Black from BOCW is one of the Pantheon's higher ups? 11. Who gave Jane that floppy disk and convincing her join the Pantheon? Was it Jackson Caine?? It could very well be considering Livingstone hinted that in the end and we see Caine in the end. 12. "Case it's me, I understand now. You don't have to-" ??? -> Was she the Voice? 13. Why did Jane wanted to go to Avalon? What is in Avalon? We know there are multiple moles in Avalon.
3. I think they gave it to Saddam in exchange for the money he gave them , since he wants Power and if he managed to use it and the CIA will be in trouble and Pantheon will get even more reason to get the Head of CIA to be stepped down of his position .. and they already had another Cradle being planted in the Capitol Building in DC. 6. some other theory says that could be Bell who was forced participate in the project ( on the same year after he got shot by Adler in the end of Cold war) and it was unsuccessful and then they brainwashed him again and wipe most of his memories...
@@charlescabbage29333. Pantheon was gonna do a false-flag operation to pin the Cradle chemical attack on Hussein (basically a 9/11-like catastrophe by foreign enemies) so that Livingstone would get fired for an intelligence failure which would promote Jane as have Pantheon control the CIA. Woods mentioned that the US won't believe it but Jane said that the US would believe whatever it sees.
I want more in future seasons hopefully about the Panama Plot we got pieces but not many. I don't think it's a coincidence that Hudson knew about Pantheon and died later.
Lastly I believe there was a channel from Dan Allen Gaming a video called: Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 - All Jackson Caine Scenes & Lore (I recommend watch) .. it shows what area Caine is in the game and his BIO ... I believe he was manipulated but the seeds of doubt seemed to grow inside of him so he was another casualty very similar to Harrow of being manipulated by who is the question and the why.
I feel like the story was mid to below average. I was really excited for the Gulf War side of things, the political side, who can you trust within the group, etc but we didn’t really get much of that. Same ol brainwashing we’ve gotten one too many times IMO. I also don’t like these conversations at the safe house vs getting the majority of the answers & new questions out in the field during gameplay.
@ The craziest part about it was the trailer for the campaign has to be one of the best ever. That’s why I was excited to see what was in store with the political side of things, what happens in the Gulf War, Saddam, etc! But nope gotta add in zombies & BRAINWASHING, something that’s been in 4 out of the 6 Black Ops Games!! WTF!!!
@Sun-Warrior1911 yeah they sure were on fire with the marketing for the campaign. I mean, I like the missions before the brain wash stuff. Even that one open world mission was neat I thought. But then, it went south. I don't expect black ops 7 that comes next year to be thrilling since it will be in the future.
Ngl it took me by surprise to see Harrow being the mole, or at least one of the moles. I wish we would had gotten more attention and character buildup for her. That would had made the reveal much more impactful. I will say the Seperation Anxiety Level looked pretty dope, it was a nice take on the MKultra stuff we saw Bell injected with. I think I would rate the campaign a 7.5/10
@@BranWolfYT just imagine if Russel Adler brings Weaver and Park along with him to help Woods, Mason, and Hudson. It would've been a wrap for Raul Menedez
(Continution) I don't think Adler knew this would happen I feel he was apart of a project (just like any routine work in a way) .. and it was shut down from biohazard and who knows maybe the gas is linked to zombies but I wonder ... if what case did was a hallucinogen than where are the directors now than .. I know Case 1 was a test subject but after the facility was shut down a scientist(could be Black from cold war buts its only a theory) told Case not to speak about what happened as Livingstone knew about it although not everything... so a kinda hide yourself in a way from who you are in a way. (but its only a gawd dang theory).
Can you do a video about the future of the Black Ops 6 story in Warzone, I absolutely love the post-launch story of Cold War with Stitch and this new story seems to be with Jackson Caine.
I really wonder .. the facility at ACR was shut down right, I also wonder another thing in Jackson Caine Bio it says he joined pantheon in 1980 but also Alder in the same facility was there 10 years ago .. as in game is 1991 ... also the 3 directors we fight were zombies or creatures from zombies .. although the 1 director was a mannequin .. could Adler be one of the directors but it was shut down and it would make sense why Livingston has this kinda tension with him in a way.
I still a question about Harrow, was she a test subject for the cradle? And she was it at the same time as case or later? Or maybe she was involved with the project before and knew case, thus him being under her command i mean if case was just rehabilitated for operational purposes somebody must've known about and try to use him to achieve pantheons goals.
I don't think Jane was exposed to cradle, and neither brainwashed. The evil Jane was her true persona, and the good Jane was her regrets for what she is doing. But since being to far gone, she supresed her good toughts, toughts that were resurfaced by Adler's serum. About her being the mole? I don't know what to say...could be. If she knew about Hudson finding out about Pantheon, maybe she gave him up to Menendez, and Menendez used Hudson to get David in order to make Hudson manipulate Woods to kill Mason. And why blame Adler for it? Because Jane thinks Adler killed her parents, that could very much be the case, because Adler joined CIA in 1959, and Jane's parents were killed in 1960. This is just my opinion, I might even be wrong, but that's how I see the things. For now.
I personally felt this story was good in compare to campaigns of last 4 years and it almost comes near mw2019 hopefully bo7 is set in 2000's and not in future
My first theory was correct all this time about Jane Harrow. And Livingstone wasn’t Menendez mole. In Mission Impossible I and III, Jim Phelps became disillusioned after the Cold War. Believing he is no longer necessary, despite having served his country for over four decades. He sold classified information to an arms dealer and set up Kittridge as the mole and frame Ethan Hunt. As for John Musgrave he’s is jingoistic, he was also another mole inside IMF. He conspired with black market dealer Owen Davian to obtain a bioweapon known as the Rabbit’s Foot and sell it to terrorist groups in Middle East. Use it as a justification for IMF to launch a preemptive strike and promote democracy and frame Theodore Brassel as a mole inside IMF. The filmmakers have Kittridge and Brassel look antagonistic to Ethan and keep the audience guessing and not knowing who the true mole is.
What about case? Can you make a video on case and Harrow? And whats that voice in his head initially i thought its Harrow's voice. I have feeling they might explore case more in future games and he might get a voice actor
My last time making this joke After surviving getting strangled in 1991. She would go join a Contracting company that was stationed out of Jalalabad. This same company would be responsible for the deaths of Echo Team.
Im seeing complaints about the story and i disagree to a degree. Its clear post story content is gonna drop to fill in some blanks. I also think this is why the ending is so open ended. The threat is no where near gone. There is a lot of questions and I don't think its on accident or a writers error. I also see people upset we didn't learn more about the mole in the CIA that killed Mason and Hudson. But we do it was pantheon. They are everywhere its not some single threat it was an organization.
I feel like the next cod next year will be like bo2 where it’s taking place in the future after 2025 and then having missions from the past after bo6 like how they did in bo2 but who knows because with the ending of bo6 there has to be a continuation of the story in that timeline
@@BranWolfYT but that’s if treyarch does what infinity ward did where they made two games in a row in the cod making cycle and also if that’s going to be the next game as David mason
They fucking butchered Vorkuta. They had a chance to do something real. But nope. Every single intense moment in the Vorkuta mission back in 2010 BO, is just some walking pathway to some tea party or gay shit
It was ok started off good then zombies appeared in the middle of the story and I was like wtf and it just didn’t hit after that, especially with verkuta you barely see it and it doesn’t really hit like how it should, I’d give it 6.5 or 7 out of 10. Cold War was a lot better in my opinion
I've never played this game (I'm going cold turkey on Call of Duty and I have no intention of playing CoD ever again due to how scummy Activision is before and after the Microsoft acquisition). After watching campaign videos and seeing how Pantheon was possibly (and most likely) the ones who aided Raul Menendez in kidnapping the young David Mason and forcing Jason Hudson to sell out Alex Mason and Frank Woods to Menendez, I feel the need to throw my hat in the ring regarding their motivations. Since Pantheon and their branch in the Advanced Technologies and Applications program was shut down by Daniel Livingstone after 1981, they sought revenge against the CIA director. However, since they were officially shut down by the CIA, Pantheon looked to the criminal underworld to finance and continue their plans, such as the crime factions in Avalon (discount Monaco) and Raul Menendez. Hudson corroborates the testimony from Kravchenko regarding moles in the CIA with the CIA memo Mason found in Menendez's compound in Nicaragua, eventually discovering Pantheon. Pantheon knew that Hudson, as well as Adler, Mason, and Woods by extension, would do everything in their power to stop the organization's plans, so they (or at the very least Hudson and Adler) needed to go. They get in contact with Raul Menendez, who wanted revenge against Woods, Mason, and Hudson for their roles in Josefina's death, and, seeing that their interests align, has David kidnapped and given to Menendez (as for what happened to Hudson's wife Jenny and their two kids, that's unknown, but we may have to fear the worst) Following the disaster at Panama, Pantheon frames Adler as the mole, essentially killing two (or four) birds with one stone. From there, Pantheon focused their efforts in unleashing the Cradle in Washington D.C., which would tarnish Livingstone's reputation and allow Jane Harrow to take control of the CIA and use it as seen fit by the shadow organization. In short, their deal with Menendez in Panama was a matter of convenience. Giving David to Menendez was just a way to get to Hudson; and leveraging Hudson was just a way to get rid of both him, Mason, Woods, and Adler; and getting rid of all four of the CIA Special Activities Division operatives would allow them to focus their efforts to get who they wanted out of the CIA director's position. With this whole scenario, Pantheon seem reminiscent to Megiddo from Splinter Cell: Conviction. Much like Megiddo, Pantheon is a shadow organization with international reach. Much like Megiddo in SC: Conviction, Pantheon felt Livingstone, by shutting them down in '81, would leave America vulnerable to threats similar to the ones Dragovich and Perseus posed to the nation. Their plan to unleash the Cradle in the Capitol Building would have not only ruined Livingstone, but it would also act as a way to gain support from the American people regarding what decisions Pantheon made through Harrow - the attack would have been a wake-up call to the American people that, even if the Cold War was over and the Soviet Union was dissolved, there would still be threats and attacks that could happen anywhere to anyone at anytime; that they need to remain vigilant and need a Pantheon-controlled CIA to keep the United States safe. While it may have been a shame to them to waste talented operatives like Mason, Hudson, Woods, and Adler, they most likely saw them as four "self-righteous homicidal maniacs" that they could find anytime they need some. To Pantheon, anyone who crosses them - such as Livingstone, Hudson, Mason, Woods, and Adler - were mere inconveniences to Pantheon. They weren't even people in their eyes.
Why do I still feel like Jane was just a filler or some kind of last minute placement? I hope she’s just a Red Herring. For her to set events in motion and to get Hudson and Mason killed I feel like there is something wrong with it. My questions are: what tipped Hudson off about Pantheon infiltrating the CIA? Was Raul Menendez behind the funding of Pantheon? What is the reason for Jane being placed in the story as the villain, was she involved with Pantheon through Menendez or did she sought them out?
I do not think alliance between Pantheon and Cordis Die/Menendez would be necessarily be of "Raul was the mastermind behind both groups" nature, but more out of convenience. The origins of Pantheon was a CIA program whose goal was to make obedient super soldiers, which resulted in creating mentally messed up individuals like Jane Harrow (who was already traumatised by her parents' death to begin with) and "Case" Calderon (who also seems to devolve into violent hallucinatory behaviour at times). The difference between Menendez/Cordis Die and Pantheon is that Raul wants to dismantle the US dominance, while Pantheon is not really opposed to the US dominance, but seeks to dominate and eventually replace the CIA itself. The alliance seems to be more akin to alliance between Shepherd and Makarov in original MW2 - rivals that found common ground. Harrow serving up Woods, Mason and Hudson to Menendez on the silver platter would cripple the CIA and gave her the opportunity to frame Adler, for whom she has a personal hatred. Ultimately though, both groups seem to follow their own agenda. The ultimate goal of Pantheon was a false flag attack in order to frame Livingstone and replace him with Harrow.
Well like it or not Adler did help save the world multiple times and did whatever was necessary to achieve it. Even if that means getting rid of an ex KGB who could’ve posed a threat later down the line, Adler is an anti hero bro, which is why he’s peak 🔥
@fantasyyygarbage Some of of threat Bell was they only gave one turn coat ending. Bro was compliant most of the campaign I would agree if during the campaign Bell was conflited and breaking out of the conditioning. Also, most of the time, who is saving the world is the player, and Adler just takes the credit. I can tolerate Hudson, but Adler is big ass no way
i say thats the worst parts about bo6 campaign story the design and gameplay is 10/10 but the ending was too meh. not aswering to who was the mole or if bell comes back or what will pantheon do is a big dissapointment for the sake of storys potential thats what made it a 5.5/10 for me as a story
@gamingtheater8377 I meant that I think that bo6 deserves a 7, it went through too many cycles of warzone, which could've screwed up the timeline (we could've had a totally different story) and it could've made us happier, so I would say 7.5
What happened to realistic and grounded shooters? I just recently replayed Medal of Honor (2010) and that story was very short but absolutely incredible. It was like watching a movie.
@@fantasyyygarbage Compare Black Ops 6's campaign to the Campaigns of the original Modern Warfare Trilogy. I wish they would make Campaigns like that while keeping the multiplayer fast paced and arcade. Black Ops 1 and Black Ops 2 were so much better in every way. Those two games had realistic and grounded campaigns while the multiplayer was fast paced and arcade.
This game answered one question and asked 20 more
Yeah that's true 😂😂
Literally... and the shit thing they will answer those questions in seasonal story in warzone or some shi.. and I hate that
Exactly lol more confused then when we started
@@djordjesurtov3995 I like the post launch story for Cold War they gave us meaning to each season rather than here’s skins and a battle pass and new maps with no story significance but they left the campaign way to open ended
@@trilogy3x like wtf is Cerberus in the game was it all just promo????
This story feels kinda meh to me. I didn’t have super high expectations, but with all the marketing around presidents, Saddam Hussein, conspiracies, and a secret organization within the CIA, I was expecting some real answers-especially to those BO2 flashbacks. But we didn’t really get much. It was pretty obvious Harrow was the villain; she’s a high-ranking CIA official and a new character, so it felt like they made her the mole just to have someone to point to, without it actually being anyone significant.
Exactly
I agree, the story is really mid compared to the original BO1 and BO2, they could make this a lot more interesting but I guess they have to save some stuff so they can milk it later at whatever multiplayer mode they are doing.
They can even fill a lot of interesting stories using the Mason timeline when he disappeared after Panama... but yeah.. they really choose to be safe with their writing, no main character dead, we don't even know for sure that Jane is really dead in the ending because it did the fade to black and " 3 weeks later " which is one of the worst ways to tell the story.
I'm disappointed but at least it's a bit better than that new MW3.
They are probably going to do the Season by Season thing like they did with Cold War
I have so many questions from this campaign:
1. Adler -> worked in Advanced Technology after 1984 did he learn about Cradle? (If so he should have some knowledge on Case/Pantheon?)
2. Pantheon Agent on the call with the Guild? Was it Jackson Caine?? Voice Analysis
3. Why was Pantheon handing the Cradle to Saddam Hussein?
4. Who is "the Voice" during Emergence? Was it Jane?
5. 4 Directors in Advanced Technology responsible for the development of Cradle? Executive Director = Livingstone knew about this and if so why did he authorize this development of a CIA funded bioweapon?
6. Case volunteered for the Cradle? Why?? Consequences for sharing about Advanced Technology and Cradle? Why? Who drilled this into head?
7. What does the Cradle really do to a human? We seen overly aggressive behaviors and ability to be manipulated
8. Why did Case trip out when ending Gusev and Jane?
9. Separation? Where did Adler get this from? Did he had ties with Advanced Technology to attain this? This didn't look like MK Ultra from Bell's case. So I don't think its the same.
10. Who killed Jane's parents? Why were they killed? Why did Black authorize this assassination? Did Harrow's parents knew about Pantheon long before during 1960s? Does this mean Emerson Black from BOCW is one of the Pantheon's higher ups?
11. Who gave Jane that floppy disk and convincing her join the Pantheon? Was it Jackson Caine?? It could very well be considering Livingstone hinted that in the end and we see Caine in the end.
12. "Case it's me, I understand now. You don't have to-" ??? -> Was she the Voice?
13. Why did Jane wanted to go to Avalon? What is in Avalon? We know there are multiple moles in Avalon.
I think she wanted to go to Avalon due to the fact it was a place someone could easily theoretically disappear.
They answer some of these questions in the game you just need to pay more attention.
3. I think they gave it to Saddam in exchange for the money he gave them , since he wants Power and if he managed to use it and the CIA will be in trouble and Pantheon will get even more reason to get the Head of CIA to be stepped down of his position .. and they already had another Cradle being planted in the Capitol Building in DC.
6. some other theory says that could be Bell who was forced participate in the project ( on the same year after he got shot by Adler in the end of Cold war) and it was unsuccessful and then they brainwashed him again and wipe most of his memories...
@@charlescabbage29333. Pantheon was gonna do a false-flag operation to pin the Cradle chemical attack on Hussein (basically a 9/11-like catastrophe by foreign enemies) so that Livingstone would get fired for an intelligence failure which would promote Jane as have Pantheon control the CIA. Woods mentioned that the US won't believe it but Jane said that the US would believe whatever it sees.
3. It is Jackson Caine. He knows Case already
I want more in future seasons hopefully about the Panama Plot we got pieces but not many. I don't think it's a coincidence that Hudson knew about Pantheon and died later.
Hudson was fucked either way , harrow has his sex tape with him and she was gonna send it to his wife if he didn't went to Panama to die
@@dimox115x9 agreed with that for sure
Lastly I believe there was a channel from Dan Allen Gaming a video called: Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 - All Jackson Caine Scenes & Lore (I recommend watch) .. it shows what area Caine is in the game and his BIO ... I believe he was manipulated but the seeds of doubt seemed to grow inside of him so he was another casualty very similar to Harrow of being manipulated by who is the question and the why.
i think Caine was manipulating Jane
@@willbaggiins9441 I can actually see that
Jane as a mole, she played them, it was about revenge for her parents
They didn't answer much in the campaign because they're saving it for the future seasons of BO6
I feel like the story was mid to below average. I was really excited for the Gulf War side of things, the political side, who can you trust within the group, etc but we didn’t really get much of that. Same ol brainwashing we’ve gotten one too many times IMO. I also don’t like these conversations at the safe house vs getting the majority of the answers & new questions out in the field during gameplay.
That's what I thought about cold wars story. But now cold war feels better compared to black ops 6...
@ Case felt like Bell but then whoops the story does a 180 & makes harrow the main bad guy, someone you barely see in the story!
@@Sun-Warrior1911 yeah it's really bad
@ The craziest part about it was the trailer for the campaign has to be one of the best ever. That’s why I was excited to see what was in store with the political side of things, what happens in the Gulf War, Saddam, etc! But nope gotta add in zombies & BRAINWASHING, something that’s been in 4 out of the 6 Black Ops Games!! WTF!!!
@Sun-Warrior1911 yeah they sure were on fire with the marketing for the campaign. I mean, I like the missions before the brain wash stuff. Even that one open world mission was neat I thought. But then, it went south. I don't expect black ops 7 that comes next year to be thrilling since it will be in the future.
Ngl it took me by surprise to see Harrow being the mole, or at least one of the moles. I wish we would had gotten more attention and character buildup for her. That would had made the reveal much more impactful. I will say the Seperation Anxiety Level looked pretty dope, it was a nice take on the MKultra stuff we saw Bell injected with. I think I would rate the campaign a 7.5/10
@@KynixYT for sure I was a bit surprised as well 🥲
@@BranWolfYTRIP Mason and Hudson 😢
the campaign was awesome, coming from that bullshit MW3 we had last year.
@@willbaggiins9441sadly next is mw4. I hope we see something that isn’t the same bs iw has been doing for a decade after mw4.
I knew it was Jane harrow.
@@superchargeredimpala. u smarter than me
@BranWolfYT She suspended wood mason and case in the beginning . She told livingstone to suspended them
i think the whole time Jane was being control by Caine the guy they showed at the very end of the campaign, this campaign was awesome
Harrow kind of feels like villainous mirror character to kate laswell
I feel like Black Ops 2 wouldve been different if Russel Adler was there
yes
@@BranWolfYT just imagine if Russel Adler brings Weaver and Park along with him to help Woods, Mason, and Hudson. It would've been a wrap for Raul Menedez
@@BranWolfYTyes it’s Jane but there’s also the very end in the computer that was also a mole
the story would've been trash then lmao bo2 campaign was a masterpiece whereas bo6 story was straight dogshit garbage.
(Continution) I don't think Adler knew this would happen I feel he was apart of a project (just like any routine work in a way) .. and it was shut down from biohazard and who knows maybe the gas is linked to zombies but I wonder ... if what case did was a hallucinogen than where are the directors now than .. I know Case 1 was a test subject but after the facility was shut down a scientist(could be Black from cold war buts its only a theory) told Case not to speak about what happened as Livingstone knew about it although not everything... so a kinda hide yourself in a way from who you are in a way. (but its only a gawd dang theory).
Can you do a video about the future of the Black Ops 6 story in Warzone, I absolutely love the post-launch story of Cold War with Stitch and this new story seems to be with Jackson Caine.
For sure!
I really wonder .. the facility at ACR was shut down right, I also wonder another thing in Jackson Caine Bio it says he joined pantheon in 1980 but also Alder in the same facility was there 10 years ago .. as in game is 1991 ... also the 3 directors we fight were zombies or creatures from zombies .. although the 1 director was a mannequin .. could Adler be one of the directors but it was shut down and it would make sense why Livingston has this kinda tension with him in a way.
Harrow was suspicious by the third mission
I still a question about Harrow, was she a test subject for the cradle? And she was it at the same time as case or later? Or maybe she was involved with the project before and knew case, thus him being under her command i mean if case was just rehabilitated for operational purposes somebody must've known about and try to use him to achieve pantheons goals.
I don't think Jane was exposed to cradle, and neither brainwashed. The evil Jane was her true persona, and the good Jane was her regrets for what she is doing. But since being to far gone, she supresed her good toughts, toughts that were resurfaced by Adler's serum. About her being the mole? I don't know what to say...could be. If she knew about Hudson finding out about Pantheon, maybe she gave him up to Menendez, and Menendez used Hudson to get David in order to make Hudson manipulate Woods to kill Mason. And why blame Adler for it? Because Jane thinks Adler killed her parents, that could very much be the case, because Adler joined CIA in 1959, and Jane's parents were killed in 1960. This is just my opinion, I might even be wrong, but that's how I see the things. For now.
@@lukajanky8469 good takes
It was Mason. He rigged Woods' rifle with rubber bullets.
Sounds legit, what I even belive is that Sara's parents were killed by Menendez's Cartel and not the CIA
I personally felt this story was good in compare to campaigns of last 4 years and it almost comes near mw2019 hopefully bo7 is set in 2000's and not in future
My first theory was correct all this time about Jane Harrow. And Livingstone wasn’t Menendez mole. In Mission Impossible I and III, Jim Phelps became disillusioned after the Cold War. Believing he is no longer necessary, despite having served his country for over four decades. He sold classified information to an arms dealer and set up Kittridge as the mole and frame Ethan Hunt. As for John Musgrave he’s is jingoistic, he was also another mole inside IMF. He conspired with black market dealer Owen Davian to obtain a bioweapon known as the Rabbit’s Foot and sell it to terrorist groups in Middle East. Use it as a justification for IMF to launch a preemptive strike and promote democracy and frame Theodore Brassel as a mole inside IMF. The filmmakers have Kittridge and Brassel look antagonistic to Ethan and keep the audience guessing and not knowing who the true mole is.
What about case? Can you make a video on case and Harrow? And whats that voice in his head initially i thought its Harrow's voice. I have feeling they might explore case more in future games and he might get a voice actor
My last time making this joke
After surviving getting strangled in 1991. She would go join a Contracting company that was stationed out of Jalalabad. This same company would be responsible for the deaths of Echo Team.
Im seeing complaints about the story and i disagree to a degree. Its clear post story content is gonna drop to fill in some blanks. I also think this is why the ending is so open ended.
The threat is no where near gone. There is a lot of questions and I don't think its on accident or a writers error.
I also see people upset we didn't learn more about the mole in the CIA that killed Mason and Hudson. But we do it was pantheon. They are everywhere its not some single threat it was an organization.
I feel like the next cod next year will be like bo2 where it’s taking place in the future after 2025 and then having missions from the past after bo6 like how they did in bo2 but who knows because with the ending of bo6 there has to be a continuation of the story in that timeline
Yeah im curious to see how that plays out
@@BranWolfYT but that’s if treyarch does what infinity ward did where they made two games in a row in the cod making cycle and also if that’s going to be the next game as David mason
They fucking butchered Vorkuta. They had a chance to do something real. But nope. Every single intense moment in the Vorkuta mission back in 2010 BO, is just some walking pathway to some tea party or gay shit
It was ok started off good then zombies appeared in the middle of the story and I was like wtf and it just didn’t hit after that, especially with verkuta you barely see it and it doesn’t really hit like how it should, I’d give it 6.5 or 7 out of 10. Cold War was a lot better in my opinion
I've never played this game (I'm going cold turkey on Call of Duty and I have no intention of playing CoD ever again due to how scummy Activision is before and after the Microsoft acquisition). After watching campaign videos and seeing how Pantheon was possibly (and most likely) the ones who aided Raul Menendez in kidnapping the young David Mason and forcing Jason Hudson to sell out Alex Mason and Frank Woods to Menendez, I feel the need to throw my hat in the ring regarding their motivations.
Since Pantheon and their branch in the Advanced Technologies and Applications program was shut down by Daniel Livingstone after 1981, they sought revenge against the CIA director. However, since they were officially shut down by the CIA, Pantheon looked to the criminal underworld to finance and continue their plans, such as the crime factions in Avalon (discount Monaco) and Raul Menendez.
Hudson corroborates the testimony from Kravchenko regarding moles in the CIA with the CIA memo Mason found in Menendez's compound in Nicaragua, eventually discovering Pantheon. Pantheon knew that Hudson, as well as Adler, Mason, and Woods by extension, would do everything in their power to stop the organization's plans, so they (or at the very least Hudson and Adler) needed to go.
They get in contact with Raul Menendez, who wanted revenge against Woods, Mason, and Hudson for their roles in Josefina's death, and, seeing that their interests align, has David kidnapped and given to Menendez (as for what happened to Hudson's wife Jenny and their two kids, that's unknown, but we may have to fear the worst)
Following the disaster at Panama, Pantheon frames Adler as the mole, essentially killing two (or four) birds with one stone.
From there, Pantheon focused their efforts in unleashing the Cradle in Washington D.C., which would tarnish Livingstone's reputation and allow Jane Harrow to take control of the CIA and use it as seen fit by the shadow organization.
In short, their deal with Menendez in Panama was a matter of convenience. Giving David to Menendez was just a way to get to Hudson; and leveraging Hudson was just a way to get rid of both him, Mason, Woods, and Adler; and getting rid of all four of the CIA Special Activities Division operatives would allow them to focus their efforts to get who they wanted out of the CIA director's position.
With this whole scenario, Pantheon seem reminiscent to Megiddo from Splinter Cell: Conviction. Much like Megiddo, Pantheon is a shadow organization with international reach. Much like Megiddo in SC: Conviction, Pantheon felt Livingstone, by shutting them down in '81, would leave America vulnerable to threats similar to the ones Dragovich and Perseus posed to the nation. Their plan to unleash the Cradle in the Capitol Building would have not only ruined Livingstone, but it would also act as a way to gain support from the American people regarding what decisions Pantheon made through Harrow - the attack would have been a wake-up call to the American people that, even if the Cold War was over and the Soviet Union was dissolved, there would still be threats and attacks that could happen anywhere to anyone at anytime; that they need to remain vigilant and need a Pantheon-controlled CIA to keep the United States safe. While it may have been a shame to them to waste talented operatives like Mason, Hudson, Woods, and Adler, they most likely saw them as four "self-righteous homicidal maniacs" that they could find anytime they need some. To Pantheon, anyone who crosses them - such as Livingstone, Hudson, Mason, Woods, and Adler - were mere inconveniences to Pantheon. They weren't even people in their eyes.
Woods the real mole who would've thought
@@Devondavis-fm2dz 🤣
Why do I still feel like Jane was just a filler or some kind of last minute placement? I hope she’s just a Red Herring. For her to set events in motion and to get Hudson and Mason killed I feel like there is something wrong with it.
My questions are: what tipped Hudson off about Pantheon infiltrating the CIA?
Was Raul Menendez behind the funding of Pantheon?
What is the reason for Jane being placed in the story as the villain, was she involved with Pantheon through Menendez or did she sought them out?
I do not think alliance between Pantheon and Cordis Die/Menendez would be necessarily be of "Raul was the mastermind behind both groups" nature, but more out of convenience.
The origins of Pantheon was a CIA program whose goal was to make obedient super soldiers, which resulted in creating mentally messed up individuals like Jane Harrow (who was already traumatised by her parents' death to begin with) and "Case" Calderon (who also seems to devolve into violent hallucinatory behaviour at times).
The difference between Menendez/Cordis Die and Pantheon is that Raul wants to dismantle the US dominance, while Pantheon is not really opposed to the US dominance, but seeks to dominate and eventually replace the CIA itself.
The alliance seems to be more akin to alliance between Shepherd and Makarov in original MW2 - rivals that found common ground.
Harrow serving up Woods, Mason and Hudson to Menendez on the silver platter would cripple the CIA and gave her the opportunity to frame Adler, for whom she has a personal hatred.
Ultimately though, both groups seem to follow their own agenda.
The ultimate goal of Pantheon
was a false flag attack in order to frame Livingstone and replace him with Harrow.
What heck is this Adler redemption bs?
Next, they gonna say he didn't delete that boi bell and was just a covert-covert undercover operation
Bell was an asset thar outlived his or her usefulness and Adler was probably ordered to take care of him or her
Well like it or not Adler did help save the world multiple times and did whatever was necessary to achieve it. Even if that means getting rid of an ex KGB who could’ve posed a threat later down the line, Adler is an anti hero bro, which is why he’s peak 🔥
Bell fans are delusional u guys treat him like he was innocent 😂
@@smiley5904 Neither is Adler. Rather, kill both. But Adler always seems to get a pass somehow
@fantasyyygarbage Some of of threat Bell was they only gave one turn coat ending.
Bro was compliant most of the campaign
I would agree if during the campaign Bell was conflited and breaking out of the conditioning.
Also, most of the time, who is saving the world is the player, and Adler just takes the credit.
I can tolerate Hudson, but Adler is big ass no way
My Father Has Given Me Some Chocolate Bars! (i have not commented here for quite a long period of time, Sorry About that)
@@Mr_Envixon I appreciate u either way bro
i say thats the worst parts about bo6 campaign story the design and gameplay is 10/10 but the ending was too meh. not aswering to who was the mole or if bell comes back or what will pantheon do is a big dissapointment for the sake of storys potential thats what made it a 5.5/10 for me as a story
@@gamingtheater8377 definitely
I think 5.5 is pushing it
@@ThisWasTheBananaManWhoCan yeah bro too generous for me to say it
@gamingtheater8377 I meant that I think that bo6 deserves a 7, it went through too many cycles of warzone, which could've screwed up the timeline (we could've had a totally different story) and it could've made us happier, so I would say 7.5
@@ThisWasTheBananaManWhoCan the game is a solid 9/10 story is just shitty
Yall hated on my boy hudson so bad man😢, my man was just doing his MF job, my mans got punched so many times
😭😂 fr
BranWolf question hi I’m trini what name episode name actor in this show
There was a lot of cut content and alot of over baring from other parties on the story
At first I gave Harrow the benefit of the doubt but I was slightly surprised to discover her betrayal
Jason Hudson lied to frank woods
Is that neymar 🤭
What happened to realistic and grounded shooters? I just recently replayed Medal of Honor (2010) and that story was very short but absolutely incredible. It was like watching a movie.
loved that game!
@@BranWolfYT Me too, that and Warfighter too. Wish they would revive the series.
Then play that? COD isn’t meant to be a realistic shooter, it’s a fast paced arcade shooter.
@@fantasyyygarbage Compare Black Ops 6's campaign to the Campaigns of the original Modern Warfare Trilogy. I wish they would make Campaigns like that while keeping the multiplayer fast paced and arcade. Black Ops 1 and Black Ops 2 were so much better in every way. Those two games had realistic and grounded campaigns while the multiplayer was fast paced and arcade.
I really think Mason coming back next black ops